DOCSLIB.ORG

Unemployment Relief Census. October, 1933

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unemployment Relief Census. October, 1933 FEDERAL EMERGENCY RELIEF ADMINISTRATION HARRY L. HOPKINS Federal Emergency R«lief Administrator UNEMPLOYMENT RELIEF CENSUS OCTOBER 1933 REPORT NUMBER TWO Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis FEDERAL EMERGENCY RELIEF ADMINISTRATION HARRY L. HOPKINS Federal Emergency Relief Administrator UNEMPLOYMENT RELIEF CENSUS OCTOBER 1933 URBAN AND RURAL AREAS SHOWING FOR THE UNITED STATES BY GEOGRAPHIC DIVISIONS AND BY STATES THE URBAN-RURAL DISTRIBUTION OF DETAILED DATA CONCERNING COLOR AND SIZE OF RELIEF FAMILIES, AND THE AGE. COLOR, AND SEX OF PERSONS IN RELIEF FAMILIES; AND PRESENTING MORE LIMITED RELIEF DATA BY COUNTIES AND CITIES UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON 11934 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL FEDERAL EMERGENCY RELIEF ADMINISTRATION, Washington, D.C., November 15, 198^ SIR: I transmit herewith the second report covering the Unemploy­ ment Relief Census of October 1933. This report deals specifically with the urban-rural distribution, the data covering families and persons on relief during the month of October 1933. It contains, in addition, a table presenting summary relief statistics by counties and a similar table for each of the cities having a population of 25,000 or more in 1930. The survey was conducted under the general supervision of Howard B. Myers, Assistant Director in charge of research. Charles F. Beach directed the field work and the tabulating of the basic material. Emerson Ross served in an advisory capacity. This report was drafted by Janet F. Nelson, Frederick F. Stephan, and Dorothy S. Thomas. The services of others not specifically mentioned are ac­ knowledged with appreciation as well. Respectfully, CoRRINGTON GlLL, Assistant Administrator Division of Research, Statistics and Finance. Hon, HARRY L. HOPKINS, Federal Emergency Relief Administrator. m Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBJECT Introduction _ 1 Summary 2 Location of urban and rural relief families 2 Color or race of persons in urban and rural relief families 6 Size of urban and rural relief families —. 6 Age of persons in urban and rural relief families 8 Sex of persons in urban and rural relief families ^ 9 Limitations of the data and of the comparisons 9 Method of collecting data__ _. 10 States included in the various geographic divisions 11 Schedule of unemployment relief census 23 LIST OF MAPS Map 1. Percentage of population on public unemployment relief, October 1933.. VIII LIST OF CHARTS Chart la. Number of families in urban areas receiving public unemployment relief, October 1933, by States and the District of Columbia 4 lb. Number of families in rural areas receiving public unemployment relief, October 1933, by States _ __ _ 5 2. Percentage of whites, Negroes, and other races on relief, October 1933, in urban and rural areas. (Percentages are estimated on the basis of the total population and population of each racial group in urban and rural areas in the 1930 Population Census.) 7 LIST OF TABLES Table A. Percentage of total population on relief, October 1933, by States and urban and rural areas (percentages are estimated on the basis of the 1930 population census) _ 12 B. Percentage of total population on relief, October 1933, by urban areas and cities grouped according to size (percentages are estimated on the basis of the 1930 population census) 14 C. Percentage of total Negro and total white population on relief, October 1933, by States and urban and rural areas for States having 100,000 or more Negroes in 1930 (percentages are estimated on the basis of the 1930 population census, and States are ranked in order of size of Negro population in 1930) 14 D. Percentage of total population of "other races" and of total white population on relief, October 1933, by States and urban areas for States having 50,000 or more persons of "other races" in 1930 (per­ centages are estimated on the basis of the 1930 population census and States are ranked in order of size of population of "other races" in 1930) 15 E. Percentage of one-person families on relief to total families on relief, October 1933, by color or race and urban and rural areas for the United States - 16 F. Comparison of percentage of 2-, 3-, or 4-person families and of 5-or- more-person families to all families of 2 or more persons in the Unem­ ployment Relief Census, October 1933, and the Population Census, 1930, by color or race and urban and rural areas for the United States 16 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis VI CONTEXTS Pace G. Comparison of percentage of persons in specified age groups in relief families, October 1933, and in the total population, 1930, by color or race and urban and rural areas by States (percentage of all age groups combined equals 100 for each urban and rural area for both relief population and total population) 17 H. Percentage of population of specified age groups on relief, October 1933, by color or race and urban and rural areas for the United States (percentages are estimated on the basis of the 1930 Popula­ tion Census) 20 I. Percentage of Negroes over 65 years of age and of whites over 65 years of age on relief by States and urban and rural areas for States having 100,000 or more Negroes in 1930 (percentages are estimated on the basis of the,number of Negroes and whites, respectively, over 65 years of age in the 1930 Population Census and States are ranked in order of size of total Negro population in 1930) 21 J. Comparison of sex ratio (males per 100 females) of persons in relief families, October 1933, and of persons in the total population, 1930, by color or race and urban and rural areas for the United States 22 UNITED STATES SUMMARY AND MAIN GEOGRAPHIC DIVISIONS Table 1. Number of relief families, October 1933, by color or race and urban and rural areas 25 2. Number of relief families, October 1933, by size and color or race and urban and rural areas 26 3. Number of persons in relief families, October 1933, by age, color or race, and sex, by urban and rural areas 28 4. Comparison of persons in relief families, October 1933, by age, color or race, and sex, and urban and rural areas, with all persons enumer­ ated in the Census of Population, 1930, as shown in percentages.. 36 STATES 5. Number of relief families, October 1933, by color or race and urban and rural areas 44 6. Number of relief families, October 1933, by size and color or race and urban and rural areas 48 7. Number of persons in relief families, October 1933, by age, color or race, and sex and urban and rural areas _. 62 8. Comparison of persons in relief families, October 1933, by age, color or race, and sex, and urban and rural areas with all persons enumerated in the Census of Population, 1930, as shown in percentages 94 COUNTIES 9. Number of relief families and number of persons in relief families, October 1933, by color or race and urban and rural areas 106 CITIES WITH POPULATION OF 25,000 OR MORE IN 1930 10. Number of relief families and number of persons in relief families, October 1933, by color or race and urban and rural areas 212 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis UNEMPLOYMENT RELIEF CENSUS, OCTOBER 1933 INTRODUCTION The number of persons receiving public unemployment relief in any month is affected by many conditions. The extent of unemployment, the possibility of seasonal and stop-gap employment, the availability of savings and other family resources, the amount of private relief, the policies and resources of public relief agencies, including those not specifically charged with unemployment relief, and many other factors influence the number of persons accepted as eligible for relief at any one time. These conditions vary among cities, among coun­ ties, and among States. Consequently different localities show vary­ ing proportions of their population on relief. In order to secure a cross-section picture of the relief situation and to provide an accurate description of the relief population by age, sex, race, family size and composition for cities, counties, and States, an unemployment relief census was taken in October 1933 by the Federal Emergency Relief Administration and the several State and local relief administrations. The collection of this simple but comprehensive information was undertaken as the first of a series of surveys designed to provide a basis of essential data for relief administration, program planning, and legislation. The principal results of the Unemployment Relief Cen­ sus were released two months after the census began and were published as Report No. One in May 1934. The first report presented the number of families by size and race, and the. number of persons by age, sex, and race, for geographic divisions, for States, and for cities having a population of 100,000 or more persons in 1930. This, the second report, presents similar data for the rural and urban areas within geographic divisions and States. It also includes somewhat less detailed information for cities of 25,000 or more inhabitants and for all counties. The data for rural and urban areas and for the smaller cities are shown in a form as far as possible comparable with the analysis in Report No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 New Orleans, Louisiana Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New Orleans, LA, 1910-1945
    Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 New Orleans, Louisiana Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New Orleans, LA, 1910-1945. T939. 311 rolls. (~A complete list of rolls has been added.) Roll Volumes Dates 1 1-3 January-June, 1910 2 4-5 July-October, 1910 3 6-7 November, 1910-February, 1911 4 8-9 March-June, 1911 5 10-11 July-October, 1911 6 12-13 November, 1911-February, 1912 7 14-15 March-June, 1912 8 16-17 July-October, 1912 9 18-19 November, 1912-February, 1913 10 20-21 March-June, 1913 11 22-23 July-October, 1913 12 24-25 November, 1913-February, 1914 13 26 March-April, 1914 14 27 May-June, 1914 15 28-29 July-October, 1914 16 30-31 November, 1914-February, 1915 17 32 March-April, 1915 18 33 May-June, 1915 19 34-35 July-October, 1915 20 36-37 November, 1915-February, 1916 21 38-39 March-June, 1916 22 40-41 July-October, 1916 23 42-43 November, 1916-February, 1917 24 44 March-April, 1917 25 45 May-June, 1917 26 46 July-August, 1917 27 47 September-October, 1917 28 48 November-December, 1917 29 49-50 Jan. 1-Mar. 15, 1918 30 51-53 Mar. 16-Apr. 30, 1918 31 56-59 June 1-Aug. 15, 1918 32 60-64 Aug. 16-0ct. 31, 1918 33 65-69 Nov. 1', 1918-Jan. 15, 1919 34 70-73 Jan. 16-Mar. 31, 1919 35 74-77 April-May, 1919 36 78-79 June-July, 1919 37 80-81 August-September, 1919 38 82-83 October-November, 1919 39 84-85 December, 1919-January, 1920 40 86-87 February-March, 1920 41 88-89 April-May, 1920 42 90 June, 1920 43 91 July, 1920 44 92 August, 1920 45 93 September, 1920 46 94 October, 1920 47 95-96 November, 1920 48 97-98 December, 1920 49 99-100 Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Libraries, October 1933 Special Libraries Association
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Special Libraries, 1933 Special Libraries, 1930s 10-1-1933 Special Libraries, October 1933 Special Libraries Association Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/sla_sl_1933 Part of the Cataloging and Metadata Commons, Collection Development and Management Commons, Information Literacy Commons, and the Scholarly Communication Commons Recommended Citation Special Libraries Association, "Special Libraries, October 1933" (1933). Special Libraries, 1933. Book 9. http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/sla_sl_1933/9 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Libraries, 1930s at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Special Libraries, 1933 by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "PUTTING KNOWLEDGE TO WORK" I. OCTOBER, 1933 A Publisher Looks at Special Libraries By ORDWAYTEAD .........................175 . Convention Program. .........................179 President's Page. ............................183 Snips and Snipes ............................184 "Newspaper Reference Methodsn-Review ........ 185 1 5. L. A. 25th ANNUAL CONFERENCE I I Congress Hotel - Chicago, Illinois I October 15-18, 1933 I SPECIAL LIBRARIES published monthly March to October, with bi-monthly issues January February and November-December, by The Special Libraries Association at 10 Ferry Street, Concord, N. H. Editorial, Advert~sing and Subscription Offices at 345 Hudson Street, New York, N. Y. Subscription
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery of 1933
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES RECOVERY OF 1933 Margaret M. Jacobson Eric M. Leeper Bruce Preston Working Paper 25629 http://www.nber.org/papers/w25629 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 March 2019 We would like to thank Bob Gregory, Nobu Kiyotaki, Adrian Pagan, Tom Sargent, Ellis Tallman, Andrew Scott, and particularly Mike Bordo, Tom Coleman, and Chris Sims. We especially thank Tao Zha for both code and VAR counsel. We also thank George Hall and Tom Sargent for providing their government debt data. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Jacobson acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. 2015174787. Preston acknowledges research support from the Australian Research Council, under the grant FT130101599. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2019 by Margaret M. Jacobson, Eric M. Leeper, and Bruce Preston. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Recovery of 1933 Margaret M. Jacobson, Eric M. Leeper, and Bruce Preston NBER Working Paper No. 25629 March 2019 JEL No.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Article Sir Ludwig Guttmann's Publications Under the Nazis
    Spinal Cord (2001) 39, 602 ± 608 ã 2001 International Medical Society of Paraplegia All rights reserved 1362 ± 4393/01 $15.00 www.nature.com/sc Historical Article Sir Ludwig Guttmann's publications under the Nazis JR Silver*,1 1Wendover, Bucks, UK Spinal Cord (2001) 39, 602 ± 608 Keywords: Guttmann; publications; Nazi Germany Introduction I wrote a historical review (Spinal Cord (2000) 38, haus in Breslau, he received a notice informing him 581 ± 596) on the history of Guttmann's and Whitter- that under Nazi laws his hospital appointment would idge's discovery of autonomic dysre¯exia which was cease on 30 June 1933. based on an application by Ludwig Guttman in 1943 This was deeply shocking to Guttmann who regarded to the Medical Research Council for a research grant. himself as `a German who happened to be a Jew'.1 As part of the application, there was a list of his Foerster appealed to the authorities to try and get publications while he was working in Germany. After them to withdraw the dismissal. As a result it was the rise of the Nazis to power, Jews were persecuted agreed that the notice of dismissal would be and not allowed to practise medicine or to publish temporarily suspended until a replacement for Gutt- scienti®c papers in Germany and the fact that these mann could be found. were published at all is remarkable. Guttmann was furious and absolutely refused to In view of the fact that Guttmann is such a accept this humiliation but he agreed to stay until the dominant in¯uence on the formation of ideas on the ocial leaving date of 30 June 1933.1 treatment of spinal injuries and was the founder of this On 10 July 1933 he started work at the Jewish journal, how these papers came to be published is of Hospital in Breslau.
    [Show full text]
  • Scrapbook Inventory
    E COLLECTION, H. L. MENCKEN COLLECTION, ENOCH PRATT FREE LIBRARY Scrapbooks of Clipping Service Start and End Dates for Each Volume Volume 1 [sealed, must be consulted on microfilm] Volume 2 [sealed, must be consulted on microfilm] Volume 3 August 1919-November 1920 Volume 4 December 1920-November 1921 Volume 5 December 1921-June-1922 Volume 6 May 1922-January 1923 Volume 7 January 1923-August 1923 Volume 8 August 1923-February 1924 Volume 9 March 1924-November 1924 Volume 10 November 1924-April 1925 Volume 11 April 1925-September 1925 Volume 12 September 1925-December 1925 Volume 13 December 1925-February 1926 Volume 14 February 1926-September 1926 Volume 15 1926 various dates Volume 16 July 1926-October 1926 Volume 17 October 1926-December 1926 Volume 18 December 1926-February 1927 Volume 19 February 1927-March 1927 Volume 20 April 1927-June 1927 Volume 21 June 1927-August 1927 Volume 22 September 1927-October 1927 Volume 23 October 1927-November 1927 Volume 24 November 1927-February 1928 Volume 25 February 1928-April 1928 Volume 26 May 1928-July 1928 Volume 27 July 1928-December 1928 Volume 28 January 1929-April 1929 Volume 29 May 1929-November 1929 Volume 30 November 1929-February 1930 Volume 31 March 1930-April 1930 Volume 32 May 1930-August 1930 Volume 33 August 1930-August 1930. Volume 34 August 1930-August 1930 Volume 35 August 1930-August 1930 Volume 36 August 1930-August 1930 Volume 37 August 1930-September 1930 Volume 38 August 1930-September 1930 Volume 39 August 1930-September 1930 Volume 40 September 1930-October 1930 Volume
    [Show full text]
  • TWO BELLS Meet the Blue Eagles, the Yankees and the Pirates
    IMM1111111mm 4141101;,.-;,0, INIRA MEMBER U.S. WE DO OUR PART etAffilit PT ,1t) 41 ■ N,AZ%"..k pro .., \ • k / . 7 ' ror 'ant 0 0 ia .11 Lii 110 - . - iii..W --,........, \ ................. -....., - N....,......1 '- - - .... . _.. , ... No. 10 Vol. XIV OCTOBER 1933 `"AfW-SMI L(M. --37Rter&O--EWMA I Am Still Rich! By ROY L. SMITH C HEN the depression came I was compelled to take an inventory and soon discovered that I was still rich. All my capacity for the enjoy- W ment of life was intact. la My two-hundred-thousand-dollar eyes are just as good as they ever were. Every landscape and sunset is mine if I want it. Twenty-thousand-dollar scenes and views are added to my collection almost every week. A hundred-thousand- dollar sense of hearing is still unimpaired and by it I become an heir to a world of beauty and inspiration. Then there's my million-dollar stomach and a half-million-dollar appe- tite. No doctor has sentenced me to spinach for the rest of my life. Better to have plain food and an appetite than to sit down to a banquet with no appetite. No man can be rich who is compelled to take orders daily from his lF stomach. ro The depression has not lowered the value of a single friendship. Neigh- 71 bors still greet us in the same old cordial way, business associates believe in us, (01 and our sons hold us in high respect. The wife's welcome at the close of the day has not depreciated in the least and our children continue to lavish their affection upon us with the same old extravagance.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Topic Three Nazi Control and Dictatorship 1933 Weimar and Nazi
    GCSE History Weimar and Nazi Germany Key Topic Three Nazi control and dictatorship 1933-1939 Weimar and Nazi Germany Key Topic Three Nazi control and dictatorship 1933-39 Reichstag Fire 27th February 1933 Causes Events Consequences A massive fire destroyed Reichstag (German The Nazis used the fire as an excuse to blame the Hitler persuaded Hindenburg to declare a state of parliament) on 27th February 1933. communists. Emergency and call an election for 5th March. The Nazis blamed a young Dutch man called Van der Lubbe was executed. The Emergency decree gave Hitler special powers to Marinus van der Lubbe. Hitler claimed the communists were trying to take over suspend civil rights, imprison opponents, and control the The Nazis believed he was a communist. and destroy Germany. police force. The Nazis used this to violently intimidate their political opponents and as a result won 288 seats in the Reichstag elections. With the support of other Nationalists, this gave Hitler a majority in the Reichstag, which he could use to make new laws. The Enabling Act: March 1933 With a majority in the Reichstag Hitler was able to make new laws. The Nazis passed the ‘Law for the removal of the distress of the people and the Reich’ (Enabling Act) in March 1933. This suspended the constitution and gave Hitler the power to make laws without the Reichstag for 4 years. The Nazis used the Enabling Act to: • Ban all other political parties • Ban all Trade Unions • Make all Civil Servants loyal Nazis • Remove regional and local parliaments SIGNIFICANCE: Marks the end of the Weimar Republic and democratic rule in Germany Weimar and Nazi Germany Key Topic Three Nazi control and dictatorship 1933-39 The Night of the Long Knives 30th June 1934 Causes Events Consequences Hitler wanted to remove opposition and consolidate his In June 1934, Hitler ordered the SA to go on leave for Hitler gains more power and consolidates his rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Keynes and the Dollar in 1933
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES KEYNES AND THE DOLLAR IN 1933 Sebastian Edwards Working Paper 23141 http://www.nber.org/papers/w23141 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 February 2017 I thank Michael Poyker for his assistance. I have benefitted from conversations with Michael Bordo and Ed Leamer. The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2017 by Sebastian Edwards. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Keynes and the Dollar in 1933 Sebastian Edwards NBER Working Paper No. 23141 February 2017 JEL No. B22,B26,B3,E31,E5,F31,N22 ABSTRACT On December 1933, John Maynard Keyes published an open letter to President Roosevelt, where he wrote: “The recent gyrations of the dollar have looked to me more like a gold standard on the booze than the ideal managed currency of my dreams.” In this paper I use high frequency data to investigate whether the gyrations of the dollar were unusually high throughout this period. My results show that although volatility was pronounced, it was not higher than during October 1931- July 1933. I analyze Keynes writings on the international monetary system in an effort to understand what he meant in his letter.
    [Show full text]
  • Of 28 October 1933 and 10 February 1938, the Protocol of 14 September
    376 377 of 28 October 1933 and 10 February 1938, the country of his nationality, or, if he has no Protocol of 14 September 1938 or the Constitu- nationality, to return to the country of his tion of the International Refugee Organisation; former habitual residence." (ii) Any person who as a result of events 91. It will be seen that apart from paragraph 6B, which occurring before 1 January 1951 and owing to also covers persons who are refugees otherwise than as a res~lt well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of events occurring before 1 January 1951, there are certain of race, religion, nationality or political opinion, slight differences between the definition adopted by the General is outside the country of his nationality and is Assembly in the Statute, and in the draft definition for the unable or, owing to such fear or for reasons Convention recommended by the General Assembly to the other than personal convenience, is unwilling to Conference of Plenipotentiaries. The definition in the Conven- avail himself of the protection of that country; tion was subjected to certain further amendments when or, who, not having a nationality and being out- considered by the Conference of Plenipotentiaries. side the country of his former habitual residence, is unable or, owing to such fear or for reasons (iii) Widening of the framework of the High Commissioner's other than personal convenience, is unwilling to activities return to it. (a) Extension of the material scope of the High Com- missioner's functions in the social field Decisions as to eligibility taken by the Inter- national Refugee Organisation during the period 92.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dutch NSB and Nazi Germany, 1933–1940
    Articles 29/3 7/6/99 12:58 pm Page 349 Dietrich Orlow A Difficult Relationship of Unequal Relatives: The Dutch NSB and Nazi Germany, 1933–1940 Until its recent reappearance in the guise of neo-fascism, European fascism had appeared to many as a transitory political phenomenon that was limited to a brief, albeit fateful, appear- ance on the modern historical scene. This conclusion contrasted strikingly with the attitude of fascism’s contemporaries in the 1920s and 1930s. For them — whether militants, sympathizers, or opponents — fascism was a serious challenge to liberal demo- cracy and Marxist socialism. The fascists themselves, of course, fully endorsed the idea that they represented an international, revolutionary vanguard, which would save European civilization from the forces of decadent bourgeois liberalism and the hordes of Marxist Bolshevism.1 As self-styled components of an international and revolution- ary phenomenon, individual fascist movements deliberately attempted to use the experiences of their ‘sister’ parties to advance their own cause. This was particularly true if the neighbouring movement had already succeeded in establishing a national fascist regime. The following analysis of the relations between the Dutch Nationaal Socialistische Beweging (NSB) and the German Nazis in the 1930s is a case study that demonstrates vividly the illusionary promises and inherent contradictions of fascist internationalism. From its beginnings the NSB looked upon itself as an integral part of the coming fascist revolution in Europe. Although like all fascist movements, the NSB was fiercely nationalistic, the party presented no original ideology of its own; all of its programme was adapted, or better copied, from the Italian fascists and the German Nazis.
    [Show full text]
  • Campus Comment, October 1933 Bridgewater State Teachers College
    Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University The ommeC nt Campus Journals and Publications 1933 Campus Comment, October 1933 Bridgewater State Teachers College Volume 7 Number 2 Recommended Citation Bridgewater State Teachers College. (1933). Campus Comment, October 1933. 7(2). Retrieved from: http://vc.bridgew.edu/comment/47 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. r Book . Week Dramatic Club·· Play N"... ember 16 - 23 November 17th l I lUAMPUS·UOMMENTj STATE TEACHERS COLLEGE, BRIDGEWATER, MASS. Vol. VII OCTOBER. 1933 No.2 Eliza Moura Tells r~-----------------------------~ HUlldred at First Presidellt Scott Prefers Hiking Chapel Calendar Men"s Club Ballquet alld Baseb&11 as Sports Hobbies Of Portugal Trip November 2--Dl'amatic Club. November 7--Class Meetings. By Stephen Lovett ( By Thelma Wolison November 9--Science Club. Likes Reading, Enjoys Well~ Not many of us have been fortun- November 14--Miss Carter. The first annual banquet of the Written Biography . ate enough to travel abroad, and we November 16-Kindergarten Men's Club was held in the Albert Transition all envy those who have had that Primary Club. Gardner Boyden Gymnasium, Septem- good fortune. Just such a coveted _____________________----') ber 26, at 6.30; President Alfred Wood Today the clouds cling close'. Men like Christie Mathewson, Hal Chase', Tris Speaker, Mickey Cochran, person resides in Woodward Hall. l presided. President Zenas Scott. prin­ The wind Babe Ruth, Pie Traynor, and Ty Cobb Her name1-Eliza Moura. cipal speaker of the evening, and sev­ Floats fleecy feathers of fuz- Higll School Play-Day play unusual baseball; "they have The ocean voyage was uneventful eral well-known educators of this dis­ ziness focused the attention of the American (no--she wasn't seasick), but the en­ Directed ·by JUlliors trict were present.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Spring Revisions EEH Final
    Recovery Spring, Faltering Fall: March to November 1933 Item Type Article Authors Taylor, Jason E.; Neumann, Todd C. Citation Recovery Spring, Faltering Fall: March to November 1933 2016, 61:54 Explorations in Economic History DOI 10.1016/j.eeh.2016.03.003 Publisher ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE Journal Explorations in Economic History Rights © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Download date 30/09/2021 23:39:42 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final accepted manuscript Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/621213 Recovery Spring, Faltering Fall: March to November 1933 Jason E. Taylor Central Michigan University 321 Sloan Hall Mount Pleasant, MI 48859 989.774.2578 [email protected] (corresponding author) Todd C. Neumann University of Arizona 1130 E. Helen Street McClelland Hall 401 Tucson, AZ 85721 520.621.3790 [email protected] Keywords: Recovery, Depression, Inflation, Devaluation, Expectations Abstract Recovery from the Great Depression began in March 1933, simultaneous to Franklin Roosevelt’s inauguration. However, the pace of that recovery between that date and the Second World War was extremely uneven with some dramatic starts and stops. Between March and July 1933, manufacturing production rose 78 percent, production of durable goods was up 199 percent, total industrial production rose 57 percent, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 71 percent. Then the economy contracted sharply again beginning in August 1933—the July 1933 level of industrial production was not reached again until August 1935. This paper addresses two questions. What factors were responsible for bringing about the sharp recovery in the spring of 1933 and what factors brought this short-lived economic surge to an end? Recovery Spring, Faltering Fall: March to November 1933 Recovery from the Great Depression began in March 1933, simultaneous to Franklin Roosevelt’s inauguration.
    [Show full text]