DOCSLIB.ORG

Citizenship Law in Africa a Comparative Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Citizenship Law in Africa a Comparative Study Citizenship Law in Africa A Comparative Study By Bronwen Manby Published by African Minds on behalf of Open Society Foundations 224 West 57th Street New York, NY 10019 www.opensocietyfoundations.org African Minds 4 Eccleston Place, Somerset West, 7130, Cape Town, South Africa [email protected] www.africanminds.org.za 2016 All contents of this document, unless specified otherwise, are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International Licence ISBNs 978-1-928331-08-7 Print 978-1-928331-12-4 e-Book 978-1-928331-13-1 e-Pub Copies of this book are available for free download at www.africanminds.org.za ORDERS To order printed copies from Africa, please contact: African Minds Email: [email protected] To order printed copies from outside Africa, please contact: African Books Collective PO Box 721, Oxford OX1 9EN, UK Email: [email protected] Contents Preface to the third edition v Disclaimer vii Abbreviations viii Definitions ix Summary and recommendations 1 The right to a nationality in African laws 4 Racial, ethnic and religious discrimination 5 Gender discrimination 6 Naturalisation 7 Dual nationality 9 Loss, deprivation and arbitrary non-recognition 9 International norms 11 Recommendations 13 International norms on nationality 21 The right to a nationality and prohibition of statelessness 21 Nationality in the context of state succession 29 Deprivation or non-recognition of nationality and expulsion from a territory 30 The jurisprudence of the African human rights bodies 33 African states’ accession to international treaties 36 Nationality under colonial rule and the transition to independence 38 The basis of nationality law today 43 The right to a nationality in national law 45 Nationality based on birth in the territory 47 Children of stateless parents or who would otherwise be stateless 49 Foundlings or children of unknown parents 49 Nationality based on descent 53 Adopted children 57 Racial and ethnic discrimination 60 iii CITIZENSHIP LAW IN AFRICA Gender discrimination 63 Nationality of children 63 Nationality based on marriage 65 Partial reforms on gender equality in North Africa 70 Dual nationality 73 Naturalisation 80 Nationality requirements for public office 97 Dual nationality 97 Naturalised persons 98 Rights for the African diaspora 101 Ethiopia 101 Ghana 101 Loss and deprivation of nationality 103 Renunciation and reacquisition 112 Evidence and documentation 116 Birth registration and evidence of entitlement to nationality 116 Proof of nationality 118 The right to a passport 121 State successions since independence 125 Separation of part of a territory 125 Transfers of territory 126 Naturalisation as a “durable solution” for refugees 128 Appendix: Legal sources 134 List of tables Table 1: Right to nationality based on birth in the territory 50 Table 2: Right to nationality based on descent 54 Table 3: Right to nationality for adopted children 58 Table 4: Right to transmit nationality to a spouse 66 Table 5: Countries permitting and prohibiting dual nationality for adults 77 Table 6: Right to acquire nationality by naturalisation 86 Table 7: Criteria for loss of nationality 109 Table 8: Renunciation and reacquisition 113 iv Preface to the third edition This is the third edition of this book, originally published in 2009 and written while I was an employee of Open Society Foundations (OSF). The second edition of 2010 included updates on several countries and some minor corrections. This third edition is a comprehensive revision of the original text, updated to reflect developments at national and continental levels, to clarify some interpretations based on my increased understanding of the issues, and to present completely revised and improved tables based on comparative analysis of the nationality laws of 54 countries in Africa, as well as additional tables dealing with new aspects of the law. The appendix contains the updated list of laws in force as of 2015 used to compile this study. Among the countries that have adopted revisions to their nationality laws of greater or lesser significance since 2009/10 are Côte d’Ivoire, Kenya, Libya, Mali, Mauritania, Namibia, Niger, Senegal, Seychelles, South Africa, Sudan, Tunisia and Zimbabwe. Perhaps the most significant other developments with impacts on nationality law and the right to a nationality are the secession of South Sudan from Sudan, and the impact of South Sudan’s new nationality on both countries, and the transfer of sovereignty of the Bakassi peninsula from Nigeria to Cameroon. There have also been major developments in standard-setting at the African and international levels. The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights adopted two resolutions and a study on the right to nationality in Africa, leading up to the adoption in July 2015 of a draft Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Specific Aspects of the Right to a Nationality and the Eradication of Statelessness in Africa. The African Committee of Experts on the Rights and Welfare of the Child handed down an important decision on the nationality of children of Nubian origin in Kenya in 2011, which informed a General Comment on Article 6 of the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child (name, birth registration and a nationality) adopted by the Committee in 2014. The UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) has also adopted a number of guidelines and other documents on statelessness and in 2014 launched a major campaign to end statelessness within 10 years. In Africa, UNHCR’s regional office in Dakar has collaborated with the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), leading to the adoption in 2015 of a regional declaration on the urgency of addressing statelessness. v CITIZENSHIP LAW IN AFRICA The first edition of this book was published at the same time as my Struggles for Citizenship in Africa (Zed Books, 2009), which gathered case studies of the practice of statelessness and citizenship discrimination in Botswana, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Kenya, Mauritania, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Swaziland, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe and elsewhere. This text draws on the information in Struggles for Citizenship in Africa, as well as on several subsequent publications, including Statelessness in Southern Africa, a briefing paper for a UNHCR Regional Conference on Statelessness in Southern Africa in November 2011, and Nationality, Migration and Statelessness in West Africa, UNHCR and IOM, 2015. The tables and information in the first edition of the report were also updated for use by the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights in its study on The Right to Nationality in Africa adopted in May 2014. The genesis of this report lay in information collected as part of a 14-country “Africa citizenship audit” initiated by Chidi Odinkalu and Julia Harrington of the Open Society Justice Initiative working with the Africa foundations in the Open Society Foundations network. Information on this survey and its participants is available at the website of the Open Society Justice Initiative.1 A group of nationality experts and advocates met in London on 20 February 2009 to discuss the recommendations for this report. Those who attended the meeting were: Adrian Berry, Chaloka Beyani, Brad Blitz, Deirdre Clancy, Jim Goldston, René de Groot, Julia Harrington, Adam Hussein, Khoti Kamanga, Ibrahima Kane, Mark Manly, Dismas Nkunda, Chidi Odinkalu, Louise Olivier, Gaye Sowe, Souleymane Sagna, Ozias Tungwarara and Patrick Weil. Abdelsalam Hassan Abdelsalam, Jorunn Brandvoll, Laurie Fransman, Susin Park, Santhosh Persaud and Laura van Waas also provided input on the recommendations. While most of the rest of the book has been revised since 2009, the recommendations remain unchanged. Thanks to all my colleagues at the Open Society Foundations for their support and guidance over many years of working on these issues. Bronwen Manby January 2016 1 https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/publications/africa-discrimination-and-citizenship-audit-report vi Disclaimer While every effort has been made to ensure that the tables and descriptions of the laws in African countries are accurate and up to date, very complex provisions have been simplified. Readers should not treat them as definitive nor accord them the status of legal advice. Many provisions are subject to interpretation, and difficult to represent in tabular form. In this edition, the laws and tables are updated to the end of December 2015. In the tables, the final column referencing the legal source gives the original date of the law currently in force, with the date of the latest amendment in brackets. vii Abbreviations ACHPR African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights ACRWC African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child AHRLR African Human Rights Law Reports AU African Union CAR Central African Republic Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination CEDAW Against Women International Convention on the Elimination of Racial CERD Discrimination CRC Convention on the Rights of the Child DRC Democratic Republic of Congo EAC East African Community ECOWAS Economic Community of West African States ICCPR International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights ICJ International Court of Justice ILC International Law Commission IOM International Organisation for Migration OAU Organisation of African Unity SADC Southern African Development Community SADR Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic STP São Tomé and Príncipe UK United
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Palestinian Refugees and the Right of Return: an International Law Analysis Gail J
    BADIL - Information & Discussion Brief Issue No. 8, January 2001 Palestinian Refugees and the Right of Return: An International Law Analysis Gail J. Boling BADIL-Briefs aim to support the Palestinian-Arab and international debate about strategies for promotion of Palestinian refugees' right of return, restitution, and compensation in the framework of a just and durable solution of the Palestinian/Arab - Israeli conflict. Background Brief No. 8 is the first of three Briefs (covering the right of return, restitution, and compensation), that examine the basis in international law for a framework for durable solutions for Palestinian refugees. This Brief examines the individual right of return of Palestinian refugees displaced in 1948 as set forth in UN General Assembly Resolution 194(III) of 11 December 1948 as grounded in international law. It is important to note that the individual right of return is completely separate from any collective right of return. However, individual and collective rights are not mutually exclusive under international law but rather supplementary and complementary; the exercise of one right can never cancel out the exercise of another and should never be viewed as doing so. In this Brief, the author argues that the right of refugees to return to their homes and properties had already achieved customary status (binding international law) by 1948. UN Resolution 194, therefore, simply reaffirms international legal principles that were already binding and which required states to allow refugees to return to their places of origin, and prohibited mass expulsion of persons - particularly on discriminatory grounds. UN Resolution 194's consistency with international law and practice over the past five decades further strengthens its value as a normative framework for a durable solution for Palestinian refugees today.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Coptic Personal Status Law Ryan Rowberry Georgia State University College of Law, [email protected]
    Georgia State University College of Law Reading Room Faculty Publications By Year Faculty Publications 1-1-2010 A Brief History of Coptic Personal Status Law Ryan Rowberry Georgia State University College of Law, [email protected] John Khalil Follow this and additional works at: https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/faculty_pub Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the Human Rights Law Commons Recommended Citation Ryan Rowberry & John Khalil, A Brief History of Coptic Personal Status Law, 3 Berk. J. Middle E. & Islamic L. 81 (2010). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Reading Room. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications By Year by an authorized administrator of Reading Room. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Brief History of Coptic Personal Status Law Ryan Rowberry John Khalil* INTRODUCTION With the U.S.-led "War on Terror" and the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan, American legal scholars have understandably focused increased attention on the various schools and applications of Islamic law in Middle Eastern countries. 1 This focus on Shari'a law, however, has tended to elide the complexity of traditional legal pluralism in many Islamic nations. Numerous Christian communities across the Middle East (e.g., Syrian, Armenian, Coptic, Nestorian, Maronite), for example, adhere to personal status laws that are not based on Islamic legal principles. Christian minority groups form the largest non-Muslim . Ryan Rowberry and Jolin Khalil graduated from Harvard Law School in 2008. Ryan is currently a natural resources associate at Hogan Lovells US LLP in Washington D.C., and John Khalil is a litigation associate at Lowey, Dannenberg, Cowey & Hart P.C.
    [Show full text]
  • REFORMING URBAN LAWS in AFRICA a PRACTICAL GUIDE Authors: Stephen Berrisford and Patrick Mcauslan
    REFORMING URBAN LAWS IN AFRICA A PRACTICAL GUIDE Authors: Stephen Berrisford and Patrick McAuslan Published by the African Centre for Cities (ACC), Cities Alliance, United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) and Urban LandMark. African Centre for Cities, University of Cape Town, Environmental & Geographical Science Building, Upper Campus, Rondebosch, 7701, South Africa Cities Alliance, Rue Royale 94, 3rd Floor, 1000 Brussels, Belgium UN-Habitat, United Nations Avenue, Nairobi, Kenya Urban LandMark, c/o Council for Scientific and Industrial Research – Built Environment, Meiring Naudé Road, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa ISBN 978-0-620-74707-3 © Stephen Berrisford 2017 Production, including editing, design and layout by Clarity Editorial cc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmItted, in any form or by any means without prior permission from the publishers. CONTENTS Foreword and acknowledgements 2 Introduction 3 Purpose of this guide 6 Characteristics of urban Sub-Saharan Africa 8 Urban law in Sub-Saharan Africa 9 A new approach to urban legal reform 10 Triggers for urban legal reform 11 Considerations when initiating reforms 14 The importance of meaningful stakeholder consultation 22 Key stakeholder groups 23 Considerations when consulting stakeholders 26 Practical preparations for drafting new urban laws 32 Establish the terms of reference 33 Identify the problem 36 Outline three legal options 40 Generate a policy paper 45 Characteristics of effective urban legislation 46 Passing the responsibility on to politicians 50 Key steps in the legislative process 50 Implementing new urban laws 52 Monitoring the effects of the new law and making adjustments 53 Indicators to measure impact 53 Monitoring and evaluation roles 54 Templates for reporting 54 Conclusion 55 Notes and references 56 Foreword and acknowledgements he idea for this guide emerged at developed, drafted and processed.
    [Show full text]
  • Forced Displacement – Global Trends in 2015
    GLObaL LEADER ON StatISTICS ON REfugEES Trends at a Glance 2015 IN REVIEW Global forced displacement has increased in 2015, with record-high numbers. By the end of the year, 65.3 million individuals were forcibly displaced worldwide as a result of persecution, conflict, generalized violence, or human rights violations. This is 5.8 million more than the previous year (59.5 million). MILLION FORCIBLY DISPLACED If these 65.3 million persons 65.3 WORLDWIDE were a nation, they would make up the 21st largest in the world. 21.3 million persons were refugees 16.1 million under UNHCR’s mandate 5.2 million Palestinian refugees registered by UNRWA 40.8 million internally displaced persons1 3.2 million asylum-seekers 12.4 24 86 MILLION PER CENT An estimated 12.4 million people were newly displaced Developing regions hosted 86 per due to conflict or persecution in cent of the world’s refugees under 2015. This included 8.6 million UNHCR’s mandate. At 13.9 million individuals displaced2 within people, this was the highest the borders of their own country figure in more than two decades. and 1.8 million newly displaced The Least Developed Countries refugees.3 The others were new provided asylum to 4.2 million applicants for asylum. refugees or about 26 per cent of the global total. 3.7 PERSONS MILLION EVERY MINUTE 183/1000 UNHCR estimates that REFUGEES / at least 10 million people On average 24 people INHABITANTS globally were stateless at the worldwide were displaced from end of 2015. However, data their homes every minute of Lebanon hosted the largest recorded by governments and every day during 2015 – some number of refugees in relation communicated to UNHCR were 34,000 people per day.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights in Western Sahara and in the Tindouf Refugee Camps
    Morocco/Western Sahara/Algeria HUMAN Human Rights in Western Sahara RIGHTS and in the Tindouf Refugee Camps WATCH Human Rights in Western Sahara and in the Tindouf Refugee Camps Morocco/Western Sahara/Algeria Copyright © 2008 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-420-6 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org December 2008 1-56432-420-6 Human Rights in Western Sahara and in the Tindouf Refugee Camps Map Of North Africa ....................................................................................................... 1 Summary...................................................................................................................... 2 Western Sahara ....................................................................................................... 3 Refugee Camps near Tindouf, Algeria ...................................................................... 8 Recommendations ...................................................................................................... 12 To the UN Security Council ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • International Criminal Justice in Africa, 2016
    International Criminal Justice in Africa, 2016 HJ van der Merwe Gerhard Kemp (eds) Strathmore University Press is the publisher of Strathmore University, Nairobi. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE IN AFRICA, 2016 Copyright © Konrad Adenauer Stiftung ISBN 978-9966-021-17-5 Year of publication 2017 Cover design and Layout by John Agutu Email: [email protected] Printed by Colourprint Ltd., P.O. Box 44466 – 00100 GPO Nairobi CONTENTS List of editors and authors ............................................................................... v Abbreviations .................................................................................................. vii List of Cases .................................................................................................... xi List of Legal Instruments ................................................................................ xxi Preface ............................................................................................................. xxxiii Introduction ..................................................................................................... xxxv Annual Report 2016 .............................................................................. xli HJ van der Merwe Introduction ..................................................................................................... xlix Rapport Annuel 2016 ............................................................................ lvi HJ van der Merwe 1. The Present and Future of Universal Jurisdiction in Africa: Lessons
    [Show full text]
  • Salem Case (Egypt, USA)
    REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES Salem Case (Egypt, USA) 8 June 1932 VOLUME II pp. 1161-1237 NATIONS UNIES - UNITED NATIONS Copyright (c) 2006 XXXII. SALEM CASE '. PARTIES: Egypt, U.S.A. SPECIAL AGREEMENT: January 20, 1931. ARBITRATORS: Walter Simons (Germany), Fred K. Nielsen (U.S.A.), Abdel Hamid Badawi Pasha (Egypt). AWARD: Berlin, June 8, 1932. Mixed Courts in Egypt.—Denial of justice.—Capitulations of 1830.— Grammatical interpretation.—"Preparatory work".—Domestic jurisdic- tion.—Nationality and diplomatic protection.—Double nationality.— Effective nationality.—Fraudulently obtained nationality.—Affidavits as evidence. 1 For bibliography, index and tables, see Volume III. 1163 Agreement between the United States of America and Egypt regarding arbitration of the claim of George J. Salem. Signed at Cairo, January 20, 1931. French and English official texts1 transmitted to the Secretariat of the League of Nations by the Department of State of the Government of the United States of America, April 6. 1932. As the United States of America is not a Member of the League of Nations, it did not register this Agreement with the Secretariat '•'•. Whereas THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA has presented to THE ROYAL GOVERNMENT OF EGYPT a claim in behalf of George J. Salem for damages resulting from acts of the Egyptian authorities: Whereas the Royal Government of Egypt has denied its liability in the premises ; and Whereas the two Governments are equally committed to the policy of submitting to adjudication by a competent tribunal all justiciable contro- versies that arise between them which do not lend themselves to settlement by diplomatic negotiations ; Therefore the undersigned William M.
    [Show full text]
  • English Version
    COUNTRY REPORT 2020/04 REPORT ON MARCH 2020 CITIZENSHIP LAW: GUATEMALA AUTHORED BY JUAN CARLOS SARAZUA © Juan Carlos Sarazua, 2020 This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, requires the consent of the authors. If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the year and the publisher. Requests should be addressed to [email protected]. Views expressed in this publication reflect the opinion of individual authors and not those of the European University Institute. Global Citizenship Observatory (GLOBALCIT) Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies in collaboration with Edinburgh University Law School Report on Citizenship Law: Guatemala RSCAS/GLOBALCIT-CR 2020/4 March 2020 Translation of Informe sobre la ciudadanía: Guatemala RSCAS/EUDO-CIT-CR 2016/02 (Trans. Lucrecia Rubio Grundell) Juan Carlos Sarazua, 2020 Printed in Italy European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) www.eui.eu/RSCAS/Publications/ cadmus.eui.eu Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies The Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, created in 1992 and currently directed by Professor Brigid Laffan, aims to develop inter-disciplinary and comparative research on the major issues facing the process of European integration, European societies and Europe’s place in 21st century global politics. The Centre is home to a large post-doctoral programme and hosts major research programmes, projects and data sets, in addition to a range of working groups and ad hoc initiatives. The research agenda is organised around a set of core themes and is continuously evolving, reflecting the changing agenda of European integration, the expanding membership of the European Union, developments in Europe’s neighbourhood and the wider world.
    [Show full text]
  • Sino-British Agreement and Nationality: Hong Kong's Future in the Hands of the People's Republic of China
    UCLA UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal Title The Sino-British Agreement and Nationality: Hong Kong's Future in the Hands of the People's Republic of China Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9j3546s0 Journal UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, 8(1) Author Chua, Christine Publication Date 1990 DOI 10.5070/P881021965 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California THE SINO-BRITISH AGREEMENT AND NATIONALITY: HONG KONG'S FUTURE IN THE HANDS OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA Christine Chua* I. INTRODUCTION On July 1, 1997, the United Kingdom will officially relinquish its sovereignty over Hong Kong' to the People's Republic of China (PRC). The terms for the transfer of governmental control are set forth in the Joint Declaration of the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Govern- ment of the People's Republic of China on the Question of Hong Kong (hereinafter, "Joint Declaration"), which was signed by rep- resentatives for both governments on December 19, 1984. The terms likewise appear in the Memoranda exchanged by the United 2 Kingdom and PRC governments on the signing date. Set forth in the Joint Declaration is the PRC's intent to estab- lish the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR). 3 Rules for implementing the separate government of the Hong Kong SAR are also enumerated. 4 The creation of the Hong Kong SAR is au- thorized by a provision in the PRC Constitution' originally in- * J.D., 1989, UCLA School of Law; B.A., 1985, Cornell University.
    [Show full text]
  • African Origins of International Law: Myth Or Reality? Jeremy I
    Florida A&M University College of Law Scholarly Commons @ FAMU Law Journal Publications Faculty Works 2015 African Origins of International Law: Myth or Reality? Jeremy I. Levitt Florida A&M University College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.law.famu.edu/faculty-research Part of the African History Commons, International Law Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Jeremy I. Levitt, African Origins of International Law: Myth or Reality? 19 UCLA J. Int'l L. Foreign Aff. 113 (2015) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Works at Scholarly Commons @ FAMU Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons @ FAMU Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE AFRICAN ORIGINS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW: MYTH OR REALITY? Jeremy 1. Levitt.* ABSTRACT This Article reconsiders the prevalent ahistorical assumption that international law began with the Treaty of Westphalia. It gathers together considerable historical evidence to conclude that the ancient world, particularly the New Kingdom period in Egypt or Kemet from 1570-1070 BeE, deployed all three of what today we would call sources of international law. African states predating the modern European nation state by nearly 6000 years engaged in treaty relations (the Treaty of Kadesh), and applied rules ofcustom (the MA 'AT) andgeneral principles of law (as enumerated in the Egyptian Bill ofRights). While Egyptologists and a few international lawyers have acknowledged these facts, scholarly * Jeremy 1. Levitt, J.D., Ph.D., is Vice-Chancellor's Chair and former Dean, University of New Brunswick Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Law Enforcement in Postcolonial Africa: Interfacing Indigenous and English Policing in Nigeria Nọnso Okafo IPES Working Paper No 7, May 2007
    INTERNATIONAL POLICE EXECUTIVE SYMPOSIUM WORKING PAPER NO 7 LAW ENFORCEMENT IN POSTCOLONIAL AFRICA: INTERFACING INDIGENOUS AND ENGLISH POLICING IN NIGERIA Nọnso Okafo M A Y 2 0 0 7 www.IPES.info The IPES Working Paper Series is an open forum for the global community of police experts, researchers, and practitioners provided by the International Police Executive Symposium (IPES). It intends to contribute to worldwide dialogue and information exchange in policing issues by providing an access to publication and the global public sphere to the members of the interested community. In essence, the Working Paper Series is pluralist in outlook. It publishes contributions in all fields of policing and manuscripts are considered irrespective of their theoretical or methodological approach. The Series welcomes in particular contributions from countries of the South and those countries of the universe which have limited access to Western public sphere. Members of the editorial board are Dominique Wisler (editor-in-chief, Khartoum, Sudan), Rick Sarre (professor of Law and Criminal Justice at the University of South Australia, Adelaide), Kam C. Wong (associate professor and chair of the Department of Criminal Justice of Xavier University, Ohio), and Onwudiwe Ihekwoaba (associate professor of Administration of Justice at Texas Southern University). Manuscripts can be sent electronically to the editorial board ([email protected]) or National Focal Points (see www.IPES.info ). © 2007 by Nonso Okafo . All rights reserved. Short sections of this text, not to exceed two paragraphs, might be quoted without explicit permission provided full credit is given to the source. The views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the International Police Executive Symposium.
    [Show full text]
  • Parolin V9 1..190
    Citizenship in the Arab World IMISCOE International Migration, Integration and Social Cohesion in Europe The IMISCOE Network of Excellence unites over 500 researchers from European institutes specialising in studies of international migration, integration and social cohesion. The Network is funded by the Sixth Framework Programme of the European Commission on Research, Citizens and Governance in a Knowledge-Based Society. Since its foundation in 2004, IMISCOE has developed an integrated, multidisciplinary and globally comparative research project led by scholars from all branches of the economic and social sciences, the humanities and law. The Network both furthers existing studies and pioneers new research in migration as a discipline. Priority is also given to promoting innovative lines of inquiry key to European policymaking and governance. The IMISCOE-Amsterdam University Press Series was created to make the Network’s findings and results available to researchers, policymakers and practitioners, the media and other interested stakeholders. High-quality manuscripts authored by IMISCOE members and cooperating partners are published in one of four distinct series. IMISCOE Research advances sound empirical and theoretical scholarship addressing themes within IMISCOE’s mandated fields of study. IMISCOE Reports disseminates Network papers and presentations of a time-sensitive nature in book form. IMISCOE Dissertations presents select PhD monographs written by IMISCOE doctoral candidates. IMISCOE Textbooks produces manuals, handbooks and other didactic tools for instructors and students of migration studies. IMISCOE Policy Briefs and more information on the Network can be found at www.imiscoe.org. Citizenship in the Arab World Kin, Religion and Nation-State Gianluca P. Parolin IMISCOE Research This work builds on five years of onsite research into citizenship in the Arab world.
    [Show full text]