DOCSLIB.ORG

North Oxfordshire Conservative Association Cherwell Boundary Review Consultation Response

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North Oxfordshire Conservative Association Cherwell Boundary Review Consultation Response North Oxfordshire Conservative Association Cherwell Boundary Review Consultation Response We wholly endorse the draft boundaries produced by the Cherwell District Council Boundary Review Group. We recognise that change is necessary in order to comply with statutory rules regarding the size and composition of wards. It is our firm belief that this draft proposal provides the best opportunity for achieving strong local government and urge the commission to endorse it in full. GENERAL COMMENTS During the council size phase of the review, Cherwell District Council requested that the number of Councillors be reduced to 48 and that election by thirds be retained. The LGBCE have therefore stated that a uniform pattern of three member wards ought to be used. We believe that a uniform pattern of wards is the best solution for the District. If any exceptions were to be made it could lead to confusion amongst electors, and electors in any exception ward would be denied the opportunity to participate in democracy as frequently as electors from other areas. Parish and Town Council areas have not been divided between wards, except in cases where the Council area is too large to fit within a single ward; and therefore only Banbury, Bicester and Kidlington have been split. Some parishes have needed to be added to Bicester and Kidlington in order to achieve acceptable electoral equality. The District has then been split into five distinct warding areas; Banbury Town, Greater Bicester, Greater Kidlington, Northern Rural and Southern Rural. We agree that parishes should not be split between wards, except in cases where the parish is too large to be contained within a single ward. We support the use of each of the warding areas: • We support keeping Banbury Town as a self-contained warding area. There is no need to include neighbouring parishes in order to achieve electoral equality and therefore we believe that the Town Council boundary is a logical divider for this warding area. • The Bicester Town Council area is too big to support three wards and is not large enough for four wards, therefore some neighbouring parishes would be required in order to achieve electoral equality. The proposed Greater Bicester Warding Area consists of Bicester Town and the parishes of Ambrosden, Bucknell, Caversfield and Chesterton which are located on the extremities of the Town Council boundary. Given the Eco-Town development to the north of Bicester, and the Kingsmere and Graven Hill developments in the south we envisage that these parishes will be working closely with Bicester Town Council in the very near future and therefore their inclusion in this warding area will help foster effective and convenient local government. • The Greater Kidlington Warding Area is composed of four parishes that closely identify with one another and have little in common with other rural areas in the south of the District. • The Cherwell Valley in the centre of the District is a logical and clearly identifiable boundary that could be utilised as a boundary for dividing the rural areas in the north and south of the District. Parish groupings do not extend across this boundary and therefore it is logical to create ward patterns on each side independently. The 16 wards have been allocated between the areas as follows: Banbury Town Warding Area – 5 wards Greater Bicester Warding Area – 4 wards Greater Kidlington Warding Area – 2 wards Northern Rural Warding Area – 3 wards Southern Rural Warding Area – 2 wards We believe that the division of seats has been conducted in a fair and equitable manner and provides sufficient flexibility for the constituent wards to comply with the statutory criteria for ward boundaries. Due to the geography of the District and the locations of the major towns of Banbury and Bicester there are limited ways to construct boundaries that comply with the statutory criteria relating to electoral equality. Under these boundaries only two wards would be outside of the accepted 10% tolerance level under the 2014 electorate figures (Kidlington East, and Heyfords, Kirtlington and Shellswell), and only a single ward would be outside the tolerance in 2019 (Adderbury, Astons and Deddington). COMMENTS REGARDING INDIVIDUAL WARD PROPOSALS BANBURY TOWN WARDING AREA Banbury Cross and Castle The centre of Banbury is a diverse area and it is virtually impossible to split the centre into identifiable communities. It is therefore sensible to place the town centre within a single ward, rather than draw arbitrary lines as has been done in the past. The existing ward boundaries which divide the town centre have led to confusion amongst electors and the boundaries are difficult to decipher. We believe it is essential that the centre of town is placed within a single ward and would not be supportive of proposals that sought to capriciously split it between wards. Suburbs immediately adjacent to the town centre comprise the remainder of the ward and clear obvious boundaries have been used, with the exception of the area to the west of Peoples Park. Bath Road, Queens Road, Kings Road and a section of Park Road identify more closely with the centre of town than the Bretch Hill estate and therefore they have been included within this ward. We agree that the inner relief road (A4260), as a major highway, provides a clear boundary line in the east of the town. This major road is a clear dividing line between communities and should not be breached. Banbury Easington This ward comprises four separate areas which have strong ties with one another; Cherwell Heights, Easington, Poets Corner and the Timms Estate. The District Centre on Chatsworth Drive in Cherwell Heights, for example, is utilised by residents on the Timms Estate due to its close proximity and ease of access, and students from across the proposed ward are within the catchment area for Banbury Aspirational Academy. St Johns RC Primary School on Avocet Way is a feeder school for the Blessed George Napier RC Secondary School on Addison Road, which is the only Roman Catholic secondary school in Cherwell. Whilst education is a matter reserved for the County Council, it is desirable that these schools be located in the same ward. The northern entry to Bankside and the Oxford Road (B4100/A4260) have been used as a clearly identifiable boundaries between the Cherwell Heights section of the ward and Hightown. Banbury Grimsbury and Hightown This ward consists of the two communities of Grimsbury and Hightown, neither of which clearly identify with other areas of the town. Whilst recently the two areas have not been located within the same local government ward, the two communities have been placed together in previous boundary reviews. Hightown is historically linked with the Railway Station in Grimsbury and many properties are former railway housing stock. Both areas are suburban in nature and divided from the town centre by the inner relief road (A4260), which serves as a clear and distinct boundary. Banbury Hardwick This ward is largely unchanged from its current boundaries, aside from some minor changes to the southern boundary along the Warwick Road and the incorporation of land to the north of Noral Way. New houses will be built on the land north of Noral Way in the near future and they will utilise the shops and other local services at Hanwell Fields. We believe that the communities contained within this ward are broadly similar in nature and that the boundaries are clear and identifiable. Banbury Ruscote Primarily composing of current and former social housing of the Bretch Hill Estate that was built in the mid 20th century, this ward has a strong affiliation for community identity. Based on the existing Ruscote ward, this new ward would incorporate the houses that were previously part of Neithrop ward, that have a clear affiliation with the Bretch Hill estate. Residents in the area look to facilities located at the junction of Woodgreen Avenue and The Fairway, which include a library, leisure centre, swimming pool, local shops and a pub. GREATER BICESTER WARDING AREA Bicester East The centre and north east of the town are combined to form this ward. This ward utilises the Buckingham Road, Launton Road and railway as clear identifiable boundaries. Bicester North This ward is identical to the existing Bicester North County Council Division, with the exception of the properties to the south of the railway line. The Eco-Town development will require increased co-operation between Bicester Town Council and Bucknell, and Caversfield Parish Councils so including them in this District will be conducive to effective and convenient local government. We believe that using the Buckingham Road provides a clear and identifiable ward boundary. Bicester South This ward comprising of Langford Village in Bicester, Ambrosden and Chesterton parishes would incorporate the Kingsmere and Graven Hill developments. Langford Village identifies itself as being a community separate from that of central Bicester and therefore is suited to being included in a ward with rural parishes. Bicester West This ward uses the railway, Middleton Stoney Road and the B4100/Queens Avenue/Kings End as a clear and identifiable boundary. GREATER KIDLINGTON WARDING AREA Kidlington East The eastern section of Kidlington has been paired with the neighbouring parish of Gosford and Water Eaton. Despite being a separate parish, there is no identifiable boundary between Gosford and Water Eaton and Kidlington and there are strong community ties between them. There are a multitude of services in Kidlington that are used by residents of Gosford and Water Eaton, meanwhile the parish has little in common with nearby rural parishes. We agree wholly with the working party’s rationale for this ward. Kidlington West The parishes to the south west of Kidlington have been paired with the western section of the town, to which these parishes have strong transport links and community ties.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Epwell Grounds Farm 13/01600/F Shutford Road Epwell OX15 6HF
    Epwell Grounds Farm 13/01600/F Shutford Road Epwell OX15 6HF Ward: Sibford District Councillor: Cllr. Reynolds Case Officer: Rebekah Morgan Recommendation: Approve Applicant: Mr Bart Dalla Mura Application Description: Solar Park Committee Referral : Major application Committee Date: 9 January 2014 1. Site Description and Proposal 1.1 The site is an area of farmland adjacent to Epwell Grounds Farm complex, which lies to the north of Epwell Road, approximately 950m to the south of the village of Shenington, 1.2km to the north-west of the village of Shutford and 850m to the west of The Plain Road. 1.2 The topography of the wider landscape is varied, scattered with a number of small hills. To the north-west of Shenington village is Shenington gliding club and airfield (1.2km from the site). 1.3 The site is made up of a single field currently under arable production with existing hedgerows along the boundaries. A public right of way is immediately adjacent to the site following the northern and eastern boundaries. 1.4 The proposal seeks consent for the construction of a solar park, to include the installation of solar panels to generate up to 7MW of electricity, with control room, fencing and other associated works. The application boundary measures 15.07 hectares; the number of individual panels has not been specified. 2. Application Publicity 2.1 The application has been advertised by way of a press notice, site notice and neighbour letters. The final date for comment on this application was 24th December 2013. One letter was received raising the following concerns: • Visual impact, being such a large site 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Definitive Map of Public Rights of Way for Oxfordshire Relevant Date: 21 February 2006
    Definitive Map of Public Rights of Way for Oxfordshire Relevant Date: 21st February 2006 Colour SHEET SP 34 SE 35 36 37 38 39 40 255/2 1400 5600 0006 8000 0003 2500 4900 6900 0006 0006 5600 7300 0004 0004 2100 3300 4500 7500 1900 4600 6600 6800 A 422 0003 5000 0006 1400 2700 5600 7300 0004 0004 2100 3300 4500 5600 7500 0006 1900 4600 6600 6800 8000 0003 8000 2700 PAGES LANE Church CHURCH LANE Apple The The Yews Cottage 45 Berries 45 Westlynne West View Spring Lime Tree Cott School Cottage Rose Cottage255/2 255/11 Malahide The Pudlicote Cottage Field View Dun Cow 3993 WEST END 3993 Manor 255/6a Canada (PH) Cromwell Cottage House The 8891 8891 Cottage THE GREEN HORNTON 0991 Reservoir 25 (disused) 5/2a 3291 255/3 Pond Stable Cott 1087 1087 Foxbury Barn Foxbury Barn 1787 0087 0087 Sugarswell Farm Issues 2784 Sugarswell Farm 5885 2784 5885 The Nook 8684 8684 Holloway Drain House Hall 9083 9083 255/5 Rose BELL STREET Cottage Old Lodge FarmOld Lodge Farm Pricilla House Turncott 3882 Home Farm 3882 3081 3081 Old Post Cottage 2080 2080 Bellvue Water Orchard Cottage ndrush Walnut Bank Wi Pavilion Brae House 0479 0479 2979 Issues 1477 1477 Sheraton Upper fton Reaches Rise Gra Roseglen 0175 0175 ilee House Langway Jub Pond Tourney House 255/4 Drain Issues 255/2a Spring 3670 3670 Drain 5070 Temple Pool 2467 Hall 2467 82668266 Spring Spring 2765 43644364 5763 7463 3263 5763 7463 3263 255/3 0062 0062 0062 0062 Reservoir 7962 Issues (Disused) Issues Pond Spring 4359 4359 1958 1958 8457 0857 8457 0857 6656 6656 4756 7554 3753 2353 5453 3753 2353 5453
    [Show full text]
  • Final Infrastructure Delivery Plan 2019
    Contents Context of IDP Update 2019 (01/04/2018 – 31/03/2019) ....................................................... 2 Section 1 – Infrastructure Delivery Plan Update, December 2019 Summary Tables ............. 3 1.1 IDP Update Bicester Projects .................................................................................. 4 1.2 IDP Update Banbury Projects ................................................................................. 8 1.3 IDP Update Kidlington and Rural Areas Projects .................................................. 10 Section 2 – Infrastructure Delivery Plan Update, December 2019 ....................................... 14 2.1 IDP Update Bicester Projects .................................................................................... 15 2.2 IDP Update Banbury Projects .................................................................................... 37 2.3 IDP Update Kidlington and Rural Areas Projects ....................................................... 55 1 Context of IDP Update 2019 (01/04/2018 – 31/03/2019) Infrastructure is an essential part of sustainable development supporting increased housing provision and economic growth, mitigating against climate change and facilitating improved quality of life within communities. The Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) contains the infrastructure required to support Cherwell Local Plan Part 1 adopted in July 2015 and it is set out in Appendix 8 of the Plan. The IDP is a live document adjusted overtime to reflect changes in circumstance and strategies alongside
    [Show full text]
  • Heyford Masterplan Design and Access Statement
    HEYFORD MASTERPLAN DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT PREPARED BY PEGASUS DESIGN P16-0631_81D | APRIL 2018 “THE GOVERNMENT ATTACHES GREAT IMPORTANCE TO THE DESIGN OF THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT. GOOD DESIGN IS A KEY ASPECT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, IS INDIVISIBLE FROM GOOD PLANNING, AND SHOULD CONTRIBUTE POSITIVELY TO MAKING PLACES BETTER FOR PEOPLE.” (PARA. 56, NPPF 2012). CONTENTS SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION PAGE 05 SECTION 2 ASSESSMENT PAGE 11 SECTION 3 DESIGN PRINCIPLES & EVOLUTION PAGE 37 SECTION 4 DESIGN PROPOSALS PAGE 55 SECTION 5 SUMMARY PAGE 101 APPENDIX 1 - COMPOSITE PARAMETER PLAN PAGE 105 Pegasus Design Pegasus Design Pegasus House Querns Business Centre Whitworth Road Cirencester GL7 1RT www.pegasusgroup.co.uk I T 01285 641717 Prepared by Pegasus Design Pegasus Design is part of Pegasus Group Ltd Prepared on behalf of Dorchester Group April 2018 Project code P16-0631 Checked by: INITIAL COPYRIGHT The contents of this document must not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part without the written consent of Pegasus Planning Group Ltd. Crown copyright. All rights reserved, Licence number 100042093. SECTION 1 SECTION 1 | INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 6 HEYFORD MASTERPLAN | DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT SECTION 1 | INTRODUCTION PURPOSE OF THE STATEMENT 1.1 This Statement has been prepared by Pegasus Urban Design on behalf of Dorchester Group to accompany the Hybrid Planning Application for a Mixed Use development at Heyford Park. 1.2 A hybrid planning application consisting of: • demolition of buildings and structures as listed in Schedule 1; • outline
    [Show full text]
  • The 2019 Programme
    Shenington with Alkerton’s Music & Literature Festival The 2019 Programme Shenington with Alkerton’s Music & Literature Festival Welcome to Shenfest 2019 We are again pleased to welcome our community together, with their family and friends, to have fun, to enjoy quality music and literature events and to help raise money for great local causes. Help and encouragement has come from many sources but we would particularly like to thank our sponsors and advertisers. Their kindness and generosity has allowed our costs to be covered and thus we are able again to make entry to all events FREE. We would like to encourage everyone attending to make donations at each event to help maintain our two beautiful Norman churches and to support the inspiring work of the Banbury Young Homelessness Project (BYHP). The programme summary for Shenfest 2019, complete with timing and location details, is on the back page of this brochure. The festival begins with an evening of jazz and swing from the Great Central Big Band, followed by more contemporary music in The Bell. Little Shenfest has a Narnia theme at lunchtime on Saturday and is followed by a talk in Alkerton church by Jacqui Furneaux about her extended trip through Asia and South America on a Royal Enfield Bullet motorbike. We are then very fortunate to have a quintet from the London Mozart Players as our main musical event on Saturday evening. In contrast, The Bell will then host The Popes until late into the evening. On Sunday afternoon the Sloggers again take on The Authors at the cricket ground in Wroxton.
    [Show full text]
  • Kidlington YARNTON, GOSFORD and WATER EATON WARD
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND WARDINGTON CP TH E E M ET V O Council RE A O ST RS Offices N K AI PERIODIC ELECTORAL REVIEW OF CHERWELL M R A M P A PERIODIC ELECTORAL REVIEW OF CHERWELL R L T B S CROPREDY WARD O Final Recommendations for Ward Boundaries in Kidlington R H O C U R G U August 2001 Final Recommendations for Ward Boundaries in Banbury H H B A A C N V KIDLINGTON NORTH WARD B E August 2001 U Hanwell R Y BOURTON CP R Hanwell O A Castle D ST MARY'S PARISH WARD St Peter's D Church A O R Recreation M A Ground H T U W O S IS Ch E A V HANWELL CP E N U G E U D L Cemetery A L I O C R O AD E T O R G E D W A A E L M R A I N L BE A N S C E I D V O N W H A M A IL R Y L ROUNDHAM PARISH WARD D ST WROXTON W R E I KIDLINGTON CP C ET K WARD H I L L School D L A Y RO Y N y UR M l a B E T A l N E A 4 w B E e il R R 4 0 a ST 2 w r R O H 3 IG e d A H h e tl D C n B a r m e e s g E KIRTLINGTON v i b i X D r R o E k T G e W E R WARD A L R R a E W n R E e O N IC K A R B R D O A O A S A D D S E T HAMPTON GAY W Recreation A W Y A AND POYLE CP Ground TE R M E A D C A R 4 l O 2 ana W 6 d C 0 or N Oxf R O L AVE A L Ch ERWE D CH Nature Reserve TH ORCHARD PARISH WARD E PHEL C PS ROFT AVENUE R D o Council A w O e R Offices l O H B M X ER r F E A FO o O RD H o R T k D W U R O A O A Y S D Playing KIDLINGTON SOUTH E SP N RI A NG Field L F S IE L E WARD D N D R V A RD I HIG BE M V R HLANDS AUMO I NT R BEGBROKE CP E E D OAD H N H E G EXETER PARISH WARD L YARNTON, GOSFORD R B ourse W U HARDWICK WARD ILD B M D ERE R
    [Show full text]
  • Cherwell, Oxford City, South Oxfordshire and Vale of White Horse Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople Accommodation Assessment
    Cherwell, Oxford City, South Oxfordshire and Vale of White Horse Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople Accommodation Assessment Final Report June 2017 Cherwell, Oxford, South Oxfordshire and Vale of White Horse GTAA – June 2017 Opinion Research Services The Strand, Swansea SA1 1AF Steve Jarman, Claire Thomas, Ciara Small and Kara Stedman Enquiries: 01792 535300 · [email protected] · www.ors.org.uk © Copyright June 2017 Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0 Contains OS data © Crown Copyright (2017) Page 2 Cherwell, Oxford, South Oxfordshire and Vale of White Horse GTAA – June 2017 Contents 1. Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction and Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 6 Key Findings .................................................................................................................................................... 7 Additional Pitch Needs – Gypsies and Travellers ........................................................................................... 7 Additional Plot Needs - Travelling Showpeople ............................................................................................. 9 Transit Requirements ................................................................................................................................... 11 2. Introduction ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Title Page Tag Line 1 Priory Manor 2 Ambrosden a Select Development of 2, 3, 4 & 5 Bedroom Homes in Ambrosden, Oxfordshire a Warm Welcome
    TITLE PAGE TAG LINE 1 PRIORY MANOR 2 AMBROSDEN A SELECT DEVELOPMENT OF 2, 3, 4 & 5 BEDROOM HOMES IN AMBROSDEN, OXFORDSHIRE A WARM WELCOME We pride ourselves in providing you with the expert help and advice you may need at all stages of buying a new home, to enable you to bring that dream within your reach. We actively seek regular feedback from our customers once they have moved into a Croudace home and use this information, alongside our own research into lifestyle changes to constantly improve our designs. Environmental aspects are considered both during the construction process and when new homes are in use and are of ever increasing importance. Our homes are designed both to reduce energy demands and minimise their impact on their surroundings. Croudace recognises that the quality of the new homes we build is of vital importance to our customers. Our uncompromising commitment to quality extends to the first class service we offer customers when they have moved in and we have an experienced team dedicated to this task. We are proud of our excellent ratings in independent customer satisfaction surveys, which place us amongst the top echelon in the house building industry. Buying a new home is a big decision. I hope you decide to buy a Croudace home and that you have many happy years living in it. Russell Denness, Group Chief Executive PRIORY MANOR 2 AMBROSDEN A WARM WELCOME FROM CROUDACE HOMES 3 YOUR NEW COMMUNITY Located in the picturesque village of Ambrosden, Priory Manor is a select development of 2, 3, 4 & 5 bedroom homes bordering verdant open countryside with rolling hills leading to the River Cherwell.
    [Show full text]
  • 10/01929/CM Ward: Yarnton, Gosford and Water Eaton Date Valid
    Application No: Ward: Yarnton, Date Valid: 23 10/01929/CM Gosford and Water December 2010 Eaton Applicant: Hanson Aggregates Site Worton Rectory Farm, Cassington Road, Yarnton Address: Proposal: The continuation of the winning and working of sand and gravel with restoration using suitable imported materials without complying with the requirements of condition 2 in order to extend the time period for extraction until December 2015 and the time period for restoration until December 2017 to allow sufficient time for the working of material from beneath the plant site (OCC ref. MW.0175/10) 1. Site Description and Proposal 1.1 The site forms part of Cassington Quarry at Worton Rectory Farm at Yarnton, to the south of the Cassington Road. The site is situated to the south of an access track, which leads to access to the A40. The area has been used for the extraction of sand and gravel and land to the south of this site has been restored to lakes. The site is situated within the Oxford Green Belt and has ecological potential. The site is also within the flood plain. 1.2 This application seeks planning permission to continue the existing operation of winning and working of sand and gravel and to eventually restore the land without complying with condition 2 of the original planning permission to allow the time period for extraction until December 2015 and for restoration until December 2017. Condition 2 currently reads: 1.3 Planning History 02/00602/CM Non compliance with condition 22 of Permission W1132/83C and CHS 458/83 to read No imported waste shall be deposited on the land apart from the area outlined in red on plan W92m/50a 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxfordshire Archdeacon's Marriage Bonds
    Oxfordshire Archdeacon’s Marriage Bond Index - 1634 - 1849 Sorted by Bride’s Parish Year Groom Parish Bride Parish 1635 Gerrard, Ralph --- Eustace, Bridget --- 1635 Saunders, William Caversham Payne, Judith --- 1635 Lydeat, Christopher Alkerton Micolls, Elizabeth --- 1636 Hilton, Robert Bloxham Cook, Mabell --- 1665 Styles, William Whatley Small, Simmelline --- 1674 Fletcher, Theodore Goddington Merry, Alice --- 1680 Jemmett, John Rotherfield Pepper Todmartin, Anne --- 1682 Foster, Daniel --- Anstey, Frances --- 1682 (Blank), Abraham --- Devinton, Mary --- 1683 Hatherill, Anthony --- Matthews, Jane --- 1684 Davis, Henry --- Gomme, Grace --- 1684 Turtle, John --- Gorroway, Joice --- 1688 Yates, Thos Stokenchurch White, Bridgett --- 1688 Tripp, Thos Chinnor Deane, Alice --- 1688 Putress, Ricd Stokenchurch Smith, Dennis --- 1692 Tanner, Wm Kettilton Hand, Alice --- 1692 Whadcocke, Deverey [?] Burrough, War Carter, Elizth --- 1692 Brotherton, Wm Oxford Hicks, Elizth --- 1694 Harwell, Isaac Islip Dagley, Mary --- 1694 Dutton, John Ibston, Bucks White, Elizth --- 1695 Wilkins, Wm Dadington Whetton, Ann --- 1695 Hanwell, Wm Clifton Hawten, Sarah --- 1696 Stilgoe, James Dadington Lane, Frances --- 1696 Crosse, Ralph Dadington Makepeace, Hannah --- 1696 Coleman, Thos Little Barford Clifford, Denis --- 1696 Colly, Robt Fritwell Kilby, Elizth --- 1696 Jordan, Thos Hayford Merry, Mary --- 1696 Barret, Chas Dadington Hestler, Cathe --- 1696 French, Nathl Dadington Byshop, Mary --- Oxfordshire Archdeacon’s Marriage Bond Index - 1634 - 1849 Sorted by
    [Show full text]
  • Public Health Funerals
    Details of deceased The information on this page is all of the information that we hold in relation to Public Health Funerals. Next of kin Referred to Government Legal Name Address* Date of Death Traced Department (if applicable) L Pompan Banbury 09/10/2019 Yes No P Falkner Adderbury 27/09/2019 Yes No E Everson Bicester 30/08/2019 Yes No W Schwarz Banbury 31/05/2019 No No M Somodi Adderbury 25/05/2019 No No J Flick Banbury 13/05/2019 No No A Hamilton-Cleeve Banbury 26/04/2019 No No J Johnson Bloxham 24/04/2019 Yes No R MacTavish Launton 06/01/2019 No No J Cashman Banbury 23/09/2018 Yes No J Dunlop Bicester 08/12/2017 No No F Stedman Banbury 14/11/2017 Yes No R Young Banbury 13/09/2017 No No D Reeves Bicester 12/05/2017 Yes No W Little Banbury 02/04/2017 Yes No P Lemon Banbury 08/09/2016 No No J A Bishop Adderbury 08/04/2016 Yes No S R Sirdefield Banbury 16/03/2016 Yes No R P Tucker Bicester 29/09/2015 No No D Walgate Banbury 17/09/2015 Yes No V M Chatzidimitriou Banbury 21/12/2014 Yes No H Carlton Banbury 23/08/2014 No No S Young Banbury 20/05/2014 No No A Gale Banbury 15/01/2014 Yes No N Briggs Charlbury 19/11/2013 Yes No M J Frapple Banbury 31/10/2013 Yes No D W Litchfield Bicester 19/10/2013 Yes No P Mackay No fixed abode 12/08/2013 Yes No J M Hale Banbury 07/03/2013 Yes No C C Hirons Banbury 04/12/2012 Yes No Please note that we are not the only public body that refers estates to the Government Legal Department for the district of Cherwell.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Held at Exeter Hall, Kidlington on Tuesday 2Nd April 2019 at 7.00Pm
    Meeting held at Exeter Hall, Kidlington on Tuesday 2nd April 2019 at 7.00pm MINUTES OF THE MEETING Meeting commenced 19.00 Councillors Present – Cllr M Billington (Chairman), Cllr C Stayt (Vice Chairman), Cllr M Smith, Cllr E Walton, Cllr N Prestidge Also in Attendance – Clerk to the Council (K East), Barwood Homes developer representatives (x3) To receive apologies for absence – Cllr S Wilson-Higgins and Cllr C Matheson 19/411 Declarations of interest: - Cllr M Smith declared his interest in the land that we may discuss within planning. 19/412 Barwood Homes Developers – Keith Fenwick with two colleagues from Barwood Homes attended the meeting to discuss the proposed housing developments and how the hearing went. Issues that came out of the hearing, main principle focuses: whether the right housing need figure had been identified by the council and the second was whether the greenbelt release was the best way to find the land needed, are there special circumstances. The second week of the hearing discussed the site specifics primarily. Two of the sites had significant objection. The land towards Oxford by the park and ride and PR8 towards Yarnton / Begbroke both reached the strongest objection. The site towards Woodstock also had significant objections. At the hearing Barwood promoted an inspection to the site for an additional 100 units but the inspector made it clear this was not for him to discuss. The local authority would make this decision if additional housing were required. The inspector was testing for soundness the plan proposed. There is a joint strategic plan coming for examination in 2022, this plan will identify needs beyond that date but this was debated.
    [Show full text]