DOCSLIB.ORG

A Tevatron Collider Retrospective

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Tevatron Collider Retrospective 6J[VILY ) ) 4.9 ± 3.6 ± ) 10.3 3.1 ) ± ( 12.3 ± CERN Courier ± 2.5 ) ( .4 ± 2.2 5.3 ) (* preliminary) 11 ± ± ( 1.8 3.6 ± 12.8 ± ± .1) ( 5.1 1 ) ) Collider physics ± 3.8 ± ± ( 3.9 1.2 5.7 k ± 3.1 ± ± ± ( 0.6 ) 167.4 ar ± 7.4 ± ( 0.8 1.5 ) 168.4 10.0 qu ± 5.3 ± ± ( ) ± 2.9 p 170.6 ( ± 1.2 ± ) to 1.4 1.8 ) 174.0 ) ± 1.5 ± ± e ( 9.0 0.8 176.1 syst ± 11.5 ± ± 5% th ( 1.8 ± 180.1 8. 11 ± 2.1 ± of ( 0.6 173.0 stat ± 9.5 ± (6 ss ( ± 20 200 174.9 ± ly 2.6 11 ma 186.0 ± Ju 0.9 3/ DOORI 172.5 ± 8. E 166.9 = U 172.3 of 173.2 /d 2 190 χ 6HSWHPEHU n 180 ) HWDO 2 HWDO c CDF-I dilepto SK\VLFV (GeV/ DØ-I dilepton top PL[LQJDQGKLJKVHQVLWLY CDF-II dilepton 170 V m DØ-II dilepton * &(51&RXULHU ² * –1 n CDF-I lepton+jets E ²' * $EXOHQFLD io DØ-I lepton+jets Y ² $EDFKL at 7KLVEHDXWLIXOPHDVXUH CDF-II lepton+jets in RVFLOODWLRQV)ROORZLQJDWZR ² V -1 DØ-II lepton+jets mb 160 ²% HWDO L = 1.0 fb CDF-I alljets co V CDF-II alljets on CDF-II track tr CDF-II MET+Jets va Te L = 1.0 fb 150 1 PHVRQVFRQVWUDLQWVRQWKHPDVVDQGTXDQWXPQXPEHUVRI ERVRQ²ERWKRIZKLFKDUHWKHPVHOYHV combined 0.35 )LJ7HYDWURQPHDVXUHPHQWVRIWKHWRSTXDUNPDVV V hadronic ] RIWKH%EDU\RQV:LWK&')·VUHFHQWREVHUYDWLRQRIWKH semileptonic -1 WKHVSLQEDU\RQVFRQWDLQLQJRQHETXDUNKDYHEHHQREVHUYHG DWWKH7HYDWURQH[FHSWIRUWKH S :HDOVRRZHWRWKH7HYDWURQRXUNQRZOHGJHRIRUELWDOO\H[FLWHG 0.30 %DQG% ; LPSRUWDQWHYLGHQFHRQ'7KH7HYDWURQH[SHULPHQWVPHWRQHRIWKHNH\WDUJHWVIRU5XQE\ [ps LW\VHDUFKHVIRUUDUHGHFD\VLQWRGLPXRQV s GHWHUPLQLQJWKHIUHTXHQF\RI% *H90RUHRYHUDJURZLQJERG\RIREVHUYD y VLGHGOLPLWSXEOLVKHGE\'WKH&')FROODERUDWLRQGHWHUPLQHGWKH (PS) m 0.25 s SE RVFLOODWLRQIUHTXHQF\DVSV m 6 7KHRVFLOODWLRQVLJQDOLVVKRZQLQÀJXUH Δ PHQWLQOLQHZLWK6WDQGDUG0RGHOH[SHFWDWLRQVFRQVWUDLQVWKH7KHGLVFRYHU\RIWKHWRSTXDUNE\WKH7HYDWURQFROODERUDWLRQVLQ 5V]LTILY / PDQQHULQZKLFKQHZSK\VLFVPLJKWVKRZLWVHOILQ% π 2 *H9EHWWHUWKDQ ZDVDODQGPDUNDFKLHYHPHQW $EH 0.20 &DULWKHUVDQG*UDQQLV %\VHDUFKHVE\&')KDG UDLVHGWKHORZHUERXQGRQWKHWRSTXDUNPDVVWR*H9H[FOXGLQJ 0H9 GHFD\VRI:LQWRWE$KHDY\WRSGHFD\VVRVZLIWO\WKDWLWFDQQRW CDF Run II Preliminary EHREVHUYHGGLUHFWO\EXWPXVWEHLQIHUUHGIURPLWVGLVLQWHJUDWLRQ LQWRDERWWRPTXDUNDQGD: CDF Run II preliminar XQVWDEOHSDUWLFOHV7KHKXQWWRRNRIIZLWKWKHJURZLQJGDWDVHWV 0.15 DYDLODEOHWRERWK&')DQG'LQ²DQGVRRQWKHSRV CERN Courier 30 VLELOLW\RIREVHUYLQJWRSZDVLQWKHDLU'VXEVHTXHQWO\UDLVHGWKH ORZHUERXQGWR 2 :::=DQG== a WLRQVWKDWSUREHGTXDQWXPFRUUHFWLRQVWRWKHHOHFWURZHDNWKHRU\ SRLQWHGWRDWRSTXDUNPDVVLQWKHUDQJH²*H9)LQGLQJ log(L) 20 decay time module 6 data = 1 cosine with A = 1.28 0.10 a 10 0 RVFLOODWLRQVLJQDOPHDVXUHGLQÀYHELQVRI 0 ² V PD\DSSURDFK 0.05 fitted amplitude fitted ²% V –1 -10 VXPPDUL]HVWKH7HYDWURQPHDVXUHPHQWV 15 16 17 18 19 20 0 –2 )LJXUH . . .. ...... ... ............ ... .. ............... .. PHVRQZLWKSUHFLVHPHDV .............. ... )LJ&')·V% .............. ... F ...... ..... ....... ERVRQDQGWRSTXDUNDUHNH\HOHPHQWVLQWKH6WDQGDUG0RGHO 100 years of superconductivity ........... ....... SURSHUGHFD\WLPHPRGXORWKHPHDVXUHGRVFLOODWLRQSHULRG ...... ..... ..... ............ : ......... QHWZRUNWKDWFRQVWUDLQVWKHSURSHUWLHVRIWKH+LJJVERVRQ$VWHOODU ....... .. .......... DFFRPSOLVKPHQWRIWKH7HYDWURQH[SHULPHQWVKDVEHHQWKHGHWHU ...... ............. SDUWVLQ .............. ...... PLQDWLRQRIWKH:ERVRQPDVVDV ................ Chris Quigg .............. DQGWKHLULPSDFWRQWKHFXUUHQWZRUOGDYHUDJH7KHFRPELQHG7KHJURZLQJGDWDVDPSOHVDYDLODEOHDWWKH7HYDWURQDORQJZLWK ..... XQFHUWDLQW\DWWKHHQGRI5XQ ................ ......... ........ ............. WKHHYROXWLRQRIH[SHULPHQWDOWHFKQLTXHVKDYHPDGHLWSRVVLEOHWR ........... REVHUYHFURVVVHFWLRQVWLPHVEUDQFKLQJUDWLRVZHOOEHORZ ..... $OORIWKHHOHFWURZHDNGLERVRQSDLUV : ....... ..... .. KDYHEHHQGHWHFWHGDWWKHUDWHVSUHGLFWHGE\WKH6WDQGDUG0RGHO .. ... .... 0DVWHU\RIWKHVHFKDQQHOVLVDSUHUHTXLVLWHWRWKH+LJJVERVRQ . ... ....... ... ..... ........ VHDUFKDWPRGHUDWHDQGKLJKPDVVHVEXWWKH\FDUU\WKHLURZQSK\V . ...... .. LFVLQWHUHVWDVZHOOWKHSRVVLELOLW\RIYDOLGDWLQJWKH6WDQGDUG0RGHO .. .. ...... .. ....... VWUXFWXUHRIWKHWULSOHJDXJHFRXSOLQJVDQGVHDUFKLQJIRUDQRPD . .. ...... &(51&RX . .. ...... ORXVFRXSOLQJVLQFRPSDWLEOHZLWKWKH6WDQGDUG0RGHO6RIDUWKH . .. WKUHHJDXJHERVRQLQWHUDFWLRQVDUHFRQVLVWHQWZLWKHOHFWURZHDN WKHRU\LQHYHU\SDUWLFXODU From bottom to top &')DQG'KDYHH[HUWHGDEURDGLPSDFWRQRXUNQRZOHGJHRI VWDWHVFRQWDLQLQJKHDY\TXDUNV6WXGLHVRIWKHSURGXFWLRQDQG GHFD\G\QDPLFVRITXDUNRQLXPVWDWHVKDYHUHSHDWHGO\FKDOOHQJHG SKHQRPHQRORJLFDOPRGHOVZKLOHPHDVXUHPHQWVRIEDQGWTXDUN SURGXFWLRQKDYHPDGHSRVVLEOHVKDUSWHVWVRI4&'FDOFXODWLRQV DWQH[WWROHDGLQJRUGHU7KH7HYDWURQH[SHULPHQWVDFFRXQWIRU QHDUO\DOORIRXUNQRZOHGJHRIWKH% XUHPHQWVRIWKHPDVVDQGOLIHWLPH7KH7HYDWURQFRQWULEXWHVZRUOG OHDGLQJPHDVXUHPHQWVRIPDVVHVDQGOLIHWLPHVRI%PHVRQVDQG ª EDU\RQVDQGKDVEHHQWKHXQLTXHVRXUFHRILQIRUPDWLRQRQPDQ\ Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory 0.002 ,,WKH)HUPLODEDFFHOHUDWRUFRPSOH[FRQVLVWHGRI ,, . GRXEOHXUG·pQHUJLH uncooled beam DQV$XMRXUG·KXLOH7HYDWURQD ,, 7KH1DWLRQDO0HGDORI7HFKQRORJ\ LQVHW DZDUGHGE\86 \HDUV,WKDVEHHQDQLQFUHGLEOHH[SHULHQFHIRU 0.001 3UHVLGHQW*HRUJH%XVKWR+HOHQ(GZDUGV'LFN/XQG\5LFK2UU ATevatron Collider Retrospective DQG$OYLQ7ROOHVWUXSLQIRUWKHLUOHDGLQJUROHVZLWKWKH 7HYDWURQ ,PDJHFUHGLW)HUPLODE9LVXDO0HGLD6HUYLFHV 'XULQJ5XQ VHYHQDFFHOHUDWRUVWKDWWRJHWKHUGHOLYHUHGEHDPIRUWKHFROOLGHU *H9+RZHYHU SURJUDPPHWZRQHXWULQREHDPVDQGRQHWHVWEHDP,WKDVSHU IRUPHGPDJQLÀFHQWO\RYHUWKH\HDUV$OOEXWWKH7HYDWURQZLOOQRZ6HSWHPEHUS 1HYHUWKHOHVVWKH7HYDWURQGHÀQHGWKH 0 electron-cooled beam FRQWLQXHRSHUDWLQJWRFDUU\)HUPLODELQWRWKHIXWXUH ULHU ODERUDWRU\IRU WKRVHRIXVIRUWXQDWHHQRXJKWRZRUNRQLW Résumé fract. momentum spread HEPAP·Washington· 27 October,,EHJDQWKLVHQDEOHG 2011 $GLHXDX7HYDWURQ /·LQVWDOODWLRQGXSUHPLHUV\QFKURWURQVXSUDFRQGXFWHXUGXPRQGH DFRPPHQFpj)HUPLODELO\D –0.001 IDLWFLUFXOHUVRQGHUQLHUIDLVFHDX$XFRXUVGHVRQH[SORLWDWLRQLO DIRXUQLGHVIDLVFHDX[SRXUFLEOHÀ[HDLQVLTXHGHVIDLVFHDX[HQ ,, FROOLVLRQFHTXLDDPHQpGHQRPEUHXVHVGpFRXYHUWHV/·LGpHG·XQ ,,ZHUHLQWKHUHJLRQ dist. function (arbitrary units) (arbitrary function dist. V\QFKURWURQVXSUDFRQGXFWHXUDFRPPHQFpDYHF5REHUW:LOVRQHQ , Fermilab. DYDQWODPLVHHQSODFHGHFHTXLHVWPDLQWHQDQW)HUPLODE/HV WUDYDX[PHQDQWDXGpYHORSSHPHQWGHODPDFKLQHRQWFRPPHQFp VpULHXVHPHQWHQHWGL[DQVSOXVWDUGOH© FRPPHRQO·DSSHODLWDFFpOpUDLWVRQSUHPLHUIDLVFHDX5REHUW'L[RQ –0.002 QRXVUDFRQWHO·KLVWRLUHGHO·DFFpOpUDWHXUTXLDpWpSHQGDQWGH QRPEUHXVHVDQQpHVOHFKDPSLRQGXPRQGHGHVKDXWHVpQHUJLHV Roger L Dixon 7KHHIIHFWRIWKHHOHFWURQEHDPRQWKHHQHUJ\VSUHDGRIWKHDQWLSURWRQ EHDPHOHFWURQFRROLQJZDVDPDMRULPSURYHPHQWRQ5XQ *H9ERRVWHU&ROGFRPSUHVVRUVZHUHDOVRDGGHGWRWKHVDWHOOLWH UHIULJHUDWRUVLQWRORZHUWKHRSHUDWLQJWHPSHUDWXUHE\ PDNLQJLWSRVVLEOHWRUDLVHWKHEHDPHQHUJ\WR WKHQHZFRPSUHVVRUVZHUHQRWXVHGXQWLOWKHEHJLQQLQJRI5XQ 7KH0DLQ,QMHFWRUKDGDODUJHUDSHUWXUHDQGFRXOGGHOLYHUPRUH LQ $OXPLQRVLW\LPSURYHPHQW´FDPSDLJQµZDV ² SURWRQVZLWKKLJKHUHIÀFLHQF\:KHQ5XQ V WKHGHOLYHU\RIPRUHSURWRQVWRWKHDQWLSURWRQWDUJHWDQGEHWWHU ² WUDQVIHUHIÀFLHQFLHVIRUSURWRQVDQGDQWLSURWRQV7KHUHZHUHDOVR LPSURYHPHQWVWRWKH$QWLSURWRQ6RXUFHDQGWKHLQFRUSRUDWLRQRI FP DQWLSURWRQVSHUKRXU7KH7HYDWURQODWWLFHZDV DQHZSHUPDQHQWPDJQHWULQJWKH5HF\FOHULQWKH0DLQ,QMHFWRU WXQQHO,QLWLDOO\PHDQWWRUHF\FOHDQWLSURWRQVLWZDVQHYHUXVHG IRUWKLVSXUSRVHLQVWHDGLWZDVXVHGWRVWDVKDQGFRRODQWLSURWRQV ð ð GHOLYHUHGIURPWKHDQWLSURWRQVRXUFH,QLWLDOOXPLQRVLWLHVDWWKHEHJLQQLQJRI5XQ RI ,,SHULRG6LJQLÀFDQWLPSURYHPHQWVZHUHPDGHWRWKHDQWL LQLWLDWHGDQGLPSOHPHQWHGFRQFXUUHQWO\ZLWKWKHSK\VLFVSURWR JUDPPH,PSURYHPHQWVFRQWLQXHGWREHPDGHRYHUPRVWRIWKH 5XQ SURWRQVRXUFHUHVXOWLQJLQDQLQFUHDVHLQWKHVWDFNLQJUDWHIURPð LPSURYHGDQGPDJQHWVZHUHUHVKLPPHGWRFRUUHFWSUREOHPVZLWK WKH´VPDUWEROWVµ6OLSVWDFNLQJZDVGHYHORSHGLQWKH0DLQ,QMHFWRU ZKLFKUHVXOWHGLQPRUHSURWRQVRQWKHDQWLSURWRQWDUJHW+RZHYHUWKHODUJHVWVLQJOHLPSURYHPHQWPDGHGXULQJ5XQ ZDVWKHGHYHORSPHQWDQGLPSOHPHQWDWLRQRIHOHFWURQFRROLQJ LQWKH5HF\FOHU7KLVHIIRUWOHGE\6HUJHL1DJDLWVHYZDVFRP PLVVLRQHGLQDQGUHVXOWHGLQVPDOOHUORQJLWXGLQDOHPPL WDQFHV8VLQJWKH5HF\FOHUWRVWDVKDQGFRRODOVRLQFUHDVHGWKH VWDFNLQJUDWHLQWKHDQWLSURWRQVRXUFHEHFDXVHSURWRQVFRXOGEHLQWKHWZRLQWHUDFWLRQUHJLRQVDQGWKHUHZDVDYLJRURXV RIIORDGHGWRWKHUHF\FOHURIWHQPDNLQJWKHFRROLQJPRUHHIÀ FLHQW7KHQHWLQFUHDVHIURPHOHFWURQFRROLQJZDVPRUHWKDQ` DIDFWRURIWZR2WKHULPSURYHPHQWVLQFOXGHGDUHGXFWLRQRI WKH SURJUDPPHWRLPSURYHWKHUHOLDELOLW\RIWKHHQWLUHFRPSOH[$OWR JHWKHUWKHLPSURYHPHQWVUHVXOWHGLQLQLWLDOOXPLQRVLWLHVDIDFWRURI EHWWHUWKDQWKHRULJLQDOGHVLJQ Fermilab Tevatron· 1983–2011 First high-energy superconducting synchrotron Model for HERA (e±p) proton ring Key milestone toward Large Hadron Collider >5 Wilson Prizes 4 National Medals of Technology 2 July 1983: 512-GeV protons 800-GeV Fixed-target experiments, 1984–2000 2 3 4 Symposium in Celebration ofthe Fixed Target Program with the , Tevatron Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory June 2, 2000 5 Tevatron proton-antiproton collider CDF D0 6 Antiproton source 7 First 1.6-TeV collisions· 13 October 1985, 02:32 8 CDF 9 During final months of operation at 1.96 TeV 12 fb–1 delivered, 10+ fb–1 recorded 10 1.6 TeV 1.8 TeV 1.96 TeV 11 12 CERN Courier 5V]LTILY 100 years of superconductivity Electron cooling in the Recycler electron-cooled beam uncooled beam dist. function (arbitrary units) –0.002 –0.001 0 0.001 0.002 fract. momentum spread 13 7KHHIIHFWRIWKHHOHFWURQEHDPRQWKHHQHUJ\VSUHDGRIWKHDQWLSURWRQ EHDPHOHFWURQFRROLQJZDVDPDMRULPSURYHPHQWRQ5XQ,, *H9ERRVWHU&ROGFRPSUHVVRUVZHUHDOVRDGGHGWRWKHVDWHOOLWH UHIULJHUDWRUVLQWRORZHUWKHRSHUDWLQJWHPSHUDWXUHE\. PDNLQJLWSRVVLEOHWRUDLVHWKHEHDPHQHUJ\WR*H9+RZHYHU WKHQHZFRPSUHVVRUVZHUHQRWXVHGXQWLOWKHEHJLQQLQJRI5XQ,, LQ 7KH0DLQ,QMHFWRUKDGDODUJHUDSHUWXUHDQGFRXOGGHOLYHUPRUH SURWRQVZLWKKLJKHUHIÀFLHQF\:KHQ5XQ,,EHJDQWKLVHQDEOHG 7KH1DWLRQDO0HGDORI7HFKQRORJ\ LQVHW DZDUGHGE\86 WKHGHOLYHU\RIPRUHSURWRQVWRWKHDQWLSURWRQWDUJHWDQGEHWWHU 3UHVLGHQW*HRUJH%XVKWR+HOHQ(GZDUGV'LFN/XQG\5LFK2UU
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supersymmetry Searches at the Tevatron
    SUPERSYMMETRY SEARCHES AT THE TEVATRON For CDF and DØ collaborations R. Demina Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, USA, 14627 CDF and DØ collaborations analyzed up to 200 pb-1 of the delivered data in search for different supersymmetry signatures, so far with negative results. We present results on searches for chargino and neutralino associated production, squarks and gluinos, sbottom quarks, gauge mediated SUSY breaking and long lived heavy particles. Supersymmetry1 is a popular extension of the Standard Model originally suggested over 25 years ago. It postulates the symmetry between fermionic and bosonic degrees of freedom. As a result a variety of hypothetical particles is introduced. With presently available experimental data physicists were able to prove that if supersymmetric particles exist they must be heavier than their Standard Model partners2. In other words the Supersymmetry is broken. One possible exception is supersymmetric top quark (stop), which still has a chance to be lighter or of the same mass as top quark. With 2-4 fb-1 of data Tevatron experiments will be able to extend the limit on stop mass above that of top quark or discover it and thus establish the Supersymmetry3. Theory suggests several possible scenarios of Supersymmetry breaking mediated by gravitational or gauge interactions. In gravity mediated scenarios the number of free parameters in the model is reduced to five because of the unification of masses and couplings imposed at the grand unification scale. These parameters are M0 (M½) – masses of all bosons (fermions) at GUT scale, A0- trilinear coupling and µ0 – something Higgs and tan(β) – ratio of vacuum expectations of the Higgs doublet.
    [Show full text]
  • The Large Hadron Collider Lyndon Evans CERN – European Organization for Nuclear Research, Geneva, Switzerland
    34th SLAC Summer Institute On Particle Physics (SSI 2006), July 17-28, 2006 The Large Hadron Collider Lyndon Evans CERN – European Organization for Nuclear Research, Geneva, Switzerland 1. INTRODUCTION The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN is now in its final installation and commissioning phase. It is a two-ring superconducting proton-proton collider housed in the 27 km tunnel previously constructed for the Large Electron Positron collider (LEP). It is designed to provide proton-proton collisions with unprecedented luminosity (1034cm-2.s-1) and a centre-of-mass energy of 14 TeV for the study of rare events such as the production of the Higgs particle if it exists. In order to reach the required energy in the existing tunnel, the dipoles must operate at 1.9 K in superfluid helium. In addition to p-p operation, the LHC will be able to collide heavy nuclei (Pb-Pb) with a centre-of-mass energy of 1150 TeV (2.76 TeV/u and 7 TeV per charge). By modifying the existing obsolete antiproton ring (LEAR) into an ion accumulator (LEIR) in which electron cooling is applied, the luminosity can reach 1027cm-2.s-1. The LHC presents many innovative features and a number of challenges which push the art of safely manipulating intense proton beams to extreme limits. The beams are injected into the LHC from the existing Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) at an energy of 450 GeV. After the two rings are filled, the machine is ramped to its nominal energy of 7 TeV over about 28 minutes. In order to reach this energy, the dipole field must reach the unprecedented level for accelerator magnets of 8.3 T.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Extra Mirror Or Sequential Families: a Case for Heavy Higgs and Inert Doublet
    Three Extra Mirror or Sequential Families: a Case for Heavy Higgs and Inert Doublet Homero Mart´ınez,1 Alejandra Melfo,2, 3 Fabrizio Nesti,4 and Goran Senjanovi´c2 1CEA, Saclay, DSM-IRFU-SPP, France 2ICTP, Trieste, Italy 3U. de Los Andes, M´erida, Venezuela 4U. di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy (Dated: October 24, 2018) We study the possibility of the existence of extra fermion families and an extra Higgs doublet. We find that requiring the extra Higgs doublet to be inert leaves space for three extra families, allowing for mirror fermion families and a dark matter candidate at the same time. The emerging scenario is very predictive: it consists of a Standard Model Higgs boson, with mass above 400 GeV, heavy new quarks between 340 and 500 GeV, light extra neutral leptons, and an inert scalar with a mass below MZ . PACS numbers: 14.65.Jk, 12.60.Fr, 14.60.Hi, 14.60.St Introduction. It may not be well known that the idea with regard to high precision analysis they behave exactly of parity restoration in weak interactions is as old as as ordinary fermions, and thus a reader who is uncom- the suggestion of its breakdown. In their classic paper, fortable with the above setbacks can view our study as Lee and Yang [1] proposed the existence of what we will referring to the more general question of whether the SM call mirror fermions, so as to make the world left-right can host three (or more) extra families. symmetric at high energies. By this they meant another If one defines the SM by its structure, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Anomalous Muon Magnetic Moment, Supersymmetry, Naturalness, LHC Search Limits and the Landscape
    OU-HEP-210415 Anomalous muon magnetic moment, supersymmetry, naturalness, LHC search limits and the landscape Howard Baer1∗, Vernon Barger2†, Hasan Serce1‡ 1Homer L. Dodge Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA 2Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 USA Abstract The recent measurement of the muon anomalous magnetic moment aµ ≡ (g − 2)µ=2 by the Fermilab Muon g − 2 experiment sharpens an earlier discrepancy between theory and the BNL E821 experiment. We examine the predicted ∆aµ ≡ aµ(exp) − aµ(th) in the context of supersymmetry with low electroweak naturalness (restricting to models which give a plausible explanation for the magnitude of the weak scale). A global analy- sis including LHC Higgs mass and sparticle search limits points to interpretation within the normal scalar mass hierarchy (NSMH) SUSY model wherein first/second generation matter scalars are much lighter than third generation scalars. We present a benchmark model for a viable NSMH point which is natural, obeys LHC Higgs and sparticle mass constraints and explains the muon magnetic anomaly. Aside from NSMH models, then we find the (g − 2)µ anomaly cannot be explained within the context of natural SUSY, where a variety of data point to decoupled first/second generation scalars. The situation is worse within the string landscape where first/second generation matter scalars are pulled arXiv:2104.07597v2 [hep-ph] 16 May 2021 to values in the 10 − 50 TeV range. An alternative interpretation for SUSY models with decoupled scalar masses is that perhaps the recent lattice evaluation of the hadronic vac- uum polarization could be confirmed which leads to a Standard Model theory-experiment agreement in which case there is no anomaly.
    [Show full text]
  • Bright Prospects for Tevatron Run II
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HIGH-ENERGY PHYSICS CERN COURIER VOLUME 43 NUMBER 1 JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2003 Bright prospects for Tevatron Run II JLAB Virginia laboratory delivers terahertz light p6 ^^^J Modular and expandable power supplies WÊ H Communications via TCP/IP içert. n_.___910S.CAEN '^^^*aBOKS^^^^ • ÊÊÊ WÊÊÊSêSê É TÏSjj à OPC Server to ease integration in DCS J Directly interfaced to JCOP Framework p " j^pj ^ ^^^^ Wa9neticFie,dand^ ^^HTJHj^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^E' ' tfHl far IM Éfefi-*il * CAEN: your largest choice of HV & LV )^ H MULTICHANNEL POWER SUPPLIES CONTENTS Covering current developments in high- energy physics and related fields worldwide CERN Courier (ISSN 0304-288X) is distributed to member state governments, institutes and laboratories affiliated with CERN, and to their personnel. It is published monthly, except for January and August, in English and French editions. The views expressed are CERN not necessarily those of the CERN management. Editors James Gillies and Christine Sutton CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Email [email protected] Fax+41 (22) 782 1906 Web cerncourier.com COURIER Advisory Board R Landua (Chairman), F Close, E Lillest0l, VOLUME 43 NUMBER 1 JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2003 H Hoffmann, C Johnson, K Potter, P Sphicas Laboratory correspondents: Argonne National Laboratory (US): D Ayres Brookhaven, National Laboratory (US): PYamin Cornell University (US): D G Cassel DESY Laboratory (Germany): Ilka Flegel, P Waloschek Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (US): Judy Jackson GSI Darmstadt (Germany): G Siegert INFN
    [Show full text]
  • Tevatron Accelerator Physics and Operation Highlights A
    FERMILAB-CONF-11-129-APC TEVATRON ACCELERATOR PHYSICS AND OPERATION HIGHLIGHTS A. Valishev for the Tevatron group, FNAL, Batavia, IL 60510, U.S.A. Abstract Table 1: Integrated luminosity performance by fiscal year. The performance of the Tevatron collider demonstrated FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 continuous growth over the course of Run II, with the peak luminosity reaching 4×1032 cm-2 s-1, and the weekly Total integral (fb-1) 1.3 1.8 1.9 2.47 -1 integration rate exceeding 70 pb . This report presents a review of the most important advances that contributed to Until the middle of calendar year 2009, the luminosity this performance improvement, including beam dynamics growth was dominated by improvements of the antiproton modeling, precision optics measurements and stability production rate [2], which remains stable since. control, implementation of collimation during low-beta Performance improvements over the last two years squeeze. Algorithms employed for optimization of the became possible because of implementation of a few luminosity integration are presented and the lessons operational changes, described in the following section. learned from high-luminosity operation are discussed. Studies of novel accelerator physics concepts at the Tevatron are described, such as the collimation techniques using crystal collimator and hollow electron beam, and compensation of beam-beam effects. COLLIDER RUN II PERFORMANCE Tevatron collider Run II with proton-antiproton collisions at the center of mass energy of 1.96 TeV started in March 2001. Since then, 10.5 fb-1 of integrated luminosity has been delivered to CDF and D0 experiments (Fig. 1). All major technical upgrades of the accelerator complex were completed by 2007 [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Top Quark Physics in the Large Hadron Collider Era
    Top Quark Physics in the Large Hadron Collider era Michael Russell Particle Physics Theory Group, School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Glasgow September 2017 arXiv:1709.10508v2 [hep-ph] 31 Jan 2018 A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Abstract We explore various aspects of top quark phenomenology at the Large Hadron Collider and proposed future machines. After summarising the role of the top quark in the Standard Model (and some of its well-known extensions), we discuss the formulation of the Standard Model as a low energy effective theory. We isolate the sector of this effective theory that pertains to the top quark and that can be probed with top observables at hadron colliders, and present a global fit of this sector to currently available data from the LHC and Tevatron. Various directions for future improvement are sketched, including analysing the potential of boosted observables and future colliders, and we highlight the importance of using complementary information from different colliders. Interpretational issues related to the validity of the effective field theory formulation are elucidated throughout. Finally, we present an application of artificial neural network algorithms to identifying highly- boosted top quark events at the LHC, and comment on further refinements of our analysis that can be made. 2 Acknowledgements First and foremost I must thank my supervisors, Chris White and Christoph Englert, for their endless support, inspiration and encouragement throughout my PhD. They always gave me enough freedom to mature as a researcher, whilst providing the occasional neces- sary nudge to keep me on the right track.
    [Show full text]
  • MIT at the Large Hadron Collider—Illuminating the High-Energy Frontier
    Mit at the large hadron collider—Illuminating the high-energy frontier 40 ) roland | klute mit physics annual 2010 gunther roland and Markus Klute ver the last few decades, teams of physicists and engineers O all over the globe have worked on the components for one of the most complex machines ever built: the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at the CERN laboratory in Geneva, Switzerland. Collaborations of thousands of scientists have assembled the giant particle detectors used to examine collisions of protons and nuclei at energies never before achieved in a labo- ratory. After initial tests proved successful in late 2009, the LHC physics program was launched in March 2010. Now the race is on to fulfill the LHC’s paradoxical mission: to complete the Stan- dard Model of particle physics by detecting its last missing piece, the Higgs boson, and to discover the building blocks of a more complete theory of nature to finally replace the Standard Model. The MIT team working on the Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) experiment at the LHC stands at the forefront of this new era of particle and nuclear physics. The High Energy Frontier Our current understanding of the fundamental interactions of nature is encap- sulated in the Standard Model of particle physics. In this theory, the multitude of subatomic particles is explained in terms of just two kinds of basic building blocks: quarks, which form protons and neutrons, and leptons, including the electron and its heavier cousins. From the three basic interactions described by the Standard Model—the strong, electroweak and gravitational forces—arise much of our understanding of the world around us, from the formation of matter in the early universe, to the energy production in the Sun, and the stability of atoms and mit physics annual 2010 roland | klute ( 41 figure 1 A photograph of the interior, central molecules.
    [Show full text]
  • 01Ii Beam Line
    STA N FO RD LIN EA R A C C ELERA TO R C EN TER Fall 2001, Vol. 31, No. 3 CONTENTS A PERIODICAL OF PARTICLE PHYSICS FALL 2001 VOL. 31, NUMBER 3 Guest Editor MICHAEL RIORDAN Editors RENE DONALDSON, BILL KIRK Contributing Editors GORDON FRASER JUDY JACKSON, AKIHIRO MAKI MICHAEL RIORDAN, PEDRO WALOSCHEK Editorial Advisory Board PATRICIA BURCHAT, DAVID BURKE LANCE DIXON, EDWARD HARTOUNI ABRAHAM SEIDEN, GEORGE SMOOT HERMAN WINICK Illustrations TERRY ANDERSON Distribution CRYSTAL TILGHMAN The Beam Line is published quarterly by the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Box 4349, Stanford, CA 94309. Telephone: (650) 926-2585. EMAIL: [email protected] FAX: (650) 926-4500 Issues of the Beam Line are accessible electroni- cally on the World Wide Web at http://www.slac. stanford.edu/pubs/beamline. SLAC is operated by Stanford University under contract with the U.S. Department of Energy. The opinions of the authors do not necessarily reflect the policies of the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center. Cover: The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory detects neutrinos from the sun. This interior view from beneath the detector shows the acrylic vessel containing 1000 tons of heavy water, surrounded by photomultiplier tubes. (Courtesy SNO Collaboration) Printed on recycled paper 2 FOREWORD 32 THE ENIGMATIC WORLD David O. Caldwell OF NEUTRINOS Trying to discern the patterns of neutrino masses and mixing. FEATURES Boris Kayser 42 THE K2K NEUTRINO 4 PAULI’S GHOST EXPERIMENT A seventy-year saga of the conception The world’s first long-baseline and discovery of neutrinos. neutrino experiment is beginning Michael Riordan to produce results. Koichiro Nishikawa & Jeffrey Wilkes 15 MINING SUNSHINE The first results from the Sudbury 50 WHATEVER HAPPENED Neutrino Observatory reveal TO HOT DARK MATTER? the “missing” solar neutrinos.
    [Show full text]
  • Chris Quigg · Physicist
    CHRIS QUIGG · PHYSICIST Theoretical Physics Department 1218 Howard Circle Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Wheaton, Illinois 60187 P.O. Box 500, Batavia, Illinois 60510 +1 630.840.3578 +1 630.660.1370 [email protected] [email protected] lutece.fnal.gov chrisquigg.com Born 15 December 1944 in Bainbridge, Maryland, USA · United States citizen PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS Theoretical Physics Department, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, 1974–present; Distinguished Scientist Emeritus, 2017–present; Department Head, 1977–1987. Superconducting Super Collider Central Design Group Deputy Director for Operations, 1987–1989. Institute for Theoretical Physics, State University of New York, Stony Brook Associate Professor, 1974; Assistant Professor, 1971–4; Research Associate, 1970–1. SECONDARY AFFILIATION University of Chicago Department of Physics and Enrico Fermi Institute, Professor (part-time), 1982–1991; Professorial Lecturer, 1978–1982; Visiting Scholar, Enrico Fermi Institute, 1974–1978. EDUCATION Yale University · B.S., Physics, 1966. Magna cum laude, with honors with exceptional distinction in physics. University of California, Berkeley · Ph.D., Physics, 1970; Thesis advisor, J. D. Jackson. Two-Reggeon-Exchange Contributions to Scattering Amplitudes at High Energies. HONORS AND AWARDS Phi Beta Kappa, 1966. Sigma Xi, 1966. De Forest Pioneers Prize (Yale University), 1966. Woodrow Wilson Fellowship, 1966–1967. HONORS AND AWARDS continued University of California Science Fellowship, 1967–1970. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Research Fellowship, 1974–1978. Fellow of the American Physical Society, 1983, for his numerous significant contributions in the theory of elementary particle physics and high energy collisions. His activities span work on multiparticle production, production and decay of intermediate bosons, and signatures of charmed mesons. One of the many notable contributions is the work on Quarkonium states, noted for lucid and seminal nonrelativistic quantum me- chanics application.
    [Show full text]
  • The Compact Linear E E− Collider (CLIC): Physics Potential
    + The Compact Linear e e− Collider (CLIC): Physics Potential Input to the European Particle Physics Strategy Update on behalf of the CLIC and CLICdp Collaborations 18 December 2018 1) Contact person: P. Roloff ∗ †‡ §¶ Editors: R. Franceschini , P. Roloff∗, U. Schnoor∗, A. Wulzer∗ † ‡ ∗ CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, Università degli Studi Roma Tre, Rome, Italy, INFN, Sezione di Roma Tre, Rome, Italy, § Università di Padova, Padova, Italy, ¶ LPTP, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland Abstract + The Compact Linear Collider, CLIC, is a proposed e e− collider at the TeV scale whose physics poten- tial ranges from high-precision measurements to extensive direct sensitivity to physics beyond the Standard Model. This document summarises the physics potential of CLIC, obtained in detailed studies, many based on full simulation of the CLIC detector. CLIC covers one order of magnitude of centre-of-mass energies from 350 GeV to 3 TeV, giving access to large event samples for a variety of SM processes, many of them for the + first time in e e− collisions or for the first time at all. The high collision energy combined with the large + luminosity and clean environment of the e e− collisions enables the measurement of the properties of Stand- ard Model particles, such as the Higgs boson and the top quark, with unparalleled precision. CLIC might also discover indirect effects of very heavy new physics by probing the parameters of the Standard Model Effective Field Theory with an unprecedented level of precision. The direct and indirect reach of CLIC to physics beyond the Standard Model significantly exceeds that of the HL-LHC. This includes new particles detected in challenging non-standard signatures.
    [Show full text]
  • The ATLAS Detector: a General Purpose Experiment at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN
    FR9806097 The ATLAS detector: a general purpose experiment at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN J. Schwindling CEA, DSM/DAPNIA, CE Saclay, 91191 Gif sur Yvette, France 1 Introduction The ATLAS collaboration has designed a general purpose detector to be operated at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN [1]. The design of the detector took into account the requirements from the physics and the constraints from the collider, but also the cost and technological aspects. It is supported by a large amount of detailed simulations and test activities. The performances which are required to meet the physics goals are the following: - The search for Higgs bosons through their decays into two photons or four elec- trons requires a good electromagnetic calorimetry. - The search for Higgs bosons decaying into four muons requires a robust muon system. - Supersymmetric particles often decay into an invisible neutralino plus other parti- cles, leading to a missing energy signature which can be measured with an hermetic detector. - The measurement of the top quark mass requires a good measurement of jets. - b quark and r lepton identification requires the precise measurement of secondary vertices. The ATLAS detector is shown in figure 1. It covers a large fraction of the 4n angle, offers robust and redundant physics measurements and allows for triggering at low PT (about 10 GeV) thresholds. In order to achieve the design LHC luminosity of 1034 cm"2 s"1, the bunch spacing will be only 25 ns, leading to about 20 minimum bias events ("pile-up") and about 1000 charged tracks produced at each bunch crossing.
    [Show full text]