Popper Re-Appraised

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Popper Re-Appraised Popper Re-appraised : New Perspectives on Karl Popper’s Method and its Applications Author Naraniecki, Alexander John Published 2010 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School School of Humanities DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/1880 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/365412 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Popper Re-appraised: New Perspectives on Karl Popper’s Method and its Applications Alexander John Naraniecki BA (Hons.) School of Humanities Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Griffith University A dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. September 2009 1 2 Statement of Authorship This work has not been previously submitted for a degree or diploma in any university. To the best of my knowledge and belief, the thesis contains no material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made in the thesis itself. Alexander J. Naraniecki 3 4 Acknowledgements I would like to thank Bruce Buchan for his supervision of this thesis and for his many readings of the drafts and the high scholarly standards that he expected of my work. I would also like to thank Wayne Hudson for his supervision of my thesis as well as his overseeing of my intellectual and scholarly development since my undergraduate years. I am very grateful to Regina Ganter who has also supported and guided my research at Griffith University since my honours year and for the valuable insights that she has provided me with over the years. I would like to thank Kay Ferres the Dean of Arts, Langauges and Criminology for her support. Many thanks to Janice Mitchell and the other administrative staff at the School of Humanities who have provided constant support over the years. I am thankful to Paul Turnbull who, as Head of School, assisted me with supporting my months of archival research in Klagenfurt, Austria without which this thesis would not have been possible. I would also like to thank Manfred Lube the Bibliotheksdirektor at the Universitätsbibliothek Klagenfurt for allowing me to research the materials at the Karl-Popper- Sammlung. His helpfulness, interest and knowledge of the collection made the months spent at the archive a scholarly experience that I will never forget. I would also like to thank Jeremy Shearmur at the ANU for advising me on the whereabouts of certain letters and lectures as well as clarifying certain arguments of Popper’s political philosophy. I would also like to thank Zuzana Parusniková for organising the “Rethinking Popper” conference at the Czech Academy of Sciences in Prague in 2007. Allowing 5 me to present my findings and to discuss Popper’s thoughts with his former students and other experts was a major turning point in my research. I am greatly indebted to Arne F. Petersen’s insights into Popper’s early writings that I have gained through discussions with him at the “Rethinking Popper” conference and through our subsequent correspondence. I am also grateful for my discussions in Prague with Joseph Agassi, Robert Cohen, Alan Musgrave, Ionut Isac, Michel Ter Hark, John Wettersten, Ian Jarvie, Federico Fernandez, Nimrod Bar-Am, Noretta Koertge, Anthony O’Hear, Stefano Gattei and Alain Boyer. I have also received invaluable criticism and insights from David Miller and Diego Rosende. I would also like to thank, Dominic Hyde, Ghil‘ad Zuckermann, John Mandalios and Haig Patapan and the late Jerzy Smolicz for the knowledge that they have imparted to me over the years. I would like to thank my family for supporting me during my years of research. This dissertation is dedicated to my late grandfather Józef Naraniecki (1920-2008). An attempt to comprehend my grandfather’s experiences of displacement and enslavement at the hands of the two great totalitarian regimes of the last century attracted me to Karl Popper’s thought more than anything else. I am grateful to my friends, who, under Wayne’s guidance at Griffith University formed an exceptional antipodean intellectual environment, and also those others with whom I have discussed my ideas with over the last few years often over a game of chess or during café discussions. 6 Table of Contents Abstract………………………………………………………………………...9 Author’s Note……………………………………………………………………..10 Chapter 1: Introduction………………………………………………….13 1. Outline………………………………………………………………...13 2. Interpreting Popper……………………………………………………24 3. Overview of Chapters…………………………………………………28 Chapter 2: The Viennese Context…………………………………....34 1. Introduction …………………………………………………………...34 2. The Vienna Circle……………………………………………………..35 3. Julius Kraft: an Extraordinary Friendship……………………………..48 4. The Renewal of Kant’s Enlightenment………………………………..51 5. Conclusion…………………………………………………………….54 Chapter 3: Popper’s Revision of Kant……………………………...56 1. Introduction……………………………………………………………56 2. Kant’s Problem and Popper’s Solution………………………………..58 3. Konrad Lorenz and the Biological Answer to Kant…………………...66 4. Popper and the Würzburg School of Cognitive Psychology………….70 5. Popper’s Friesian Epistemology………………………………………82 6. Kritisierbarkeit and Gegenstand………………………………………99 7. The Theory of Knowledge and the Psychology of Knowledge……...111 8. Conclusion…………………………………………………………...119 Chapter 4: Truth and The Open Society…………………………..121 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………..121 2. Background to the Popper-Tarski Connection……………………….124 3. Popper’s Problematic Understanding of Truth………………………127 4. Combining Bühler’s Linguistic Schema and Tarski’s Truth Theory..143 5. Broader Philosophical Implications…………………………………149 6. Conclusion…………………………………………………………...154 7 Chapter 5: Definitions and Essences………………………………157 1. Introduction ………………………………………………………….157 2. Essentialism in Popper’s Thought…………………………………...158 3. Diarrhesis and Definition……………………………………………167 4. Negativism…………………………………………………………...177 5. The Problem of Meaning…………………………………………….181 6. Ethical Principles and the Theory of Human Knowledge…………...186 7. Conclusion…………………………………………………………...190 Chapter 6: Realism and Objectivism……………………………..191 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………..191 2. Popper’s Metaphysical Turn…………………………………………193 3. Popper’s Cosmology…………………………………………………198 4. The World 3 Ontology……………………………………………….202 5. Popper and the Reality of Objects…………………………………...212 6. Objects, Individual Kinds and Causal Powers……………………….216 7. A Hidden Essentialism……………………………………………….222 8. Conclusion…………………………………………………………...227 Chapter 7: Popper, Berlin and Political Philosophy………….229 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………..229 2. Intellectual interaction between Popper and Berlin….........................231 3. Epistemological Differences………………………………………....235 4. The Challenge of the “Third Discipline”…………………………….238 5. The Problem of Liberty………………………………………………244 6. Conclusion…………………………………………………………...253 Chapter 8: The Late Lectures………………………………………….255 1. Introduction………………………………………………………….255 2. The Origin of the European Book…………………………………...260 3. Ethical and Methodological Individualism………………………….267 4. Public and Private Values…………………………………………...287 5. Conclusion…………………………………………………………...299 Chapter 9: Conclusion………………………………………………….301 Bibliography.................................................................................................314 Tables Table 1: Popper-Bühler Linguistic Schema……………………………………..81 Table 2: Popper’s Worlds and Corresponding Language Functions……….......206 8 Abstract This thesis takes a twofold approach to Popper’s work. First, it observes the thematic changes in his work over the course of his life. Second, it analyses the methods used by Popper in articulating his arguments and observes how those arguments relate to his methodological prohibitions. It will be argued in the thesis that Popper’s methodological thought was shaped by his ambition to deal with theories that did not fit into his previously prescribed limits for science. The practical need to create reasonable arguments that were both critical and rational in The Poverty of Historicism (1957) and The Open Society (1945) would force a change of stance in his attitude towards “transcendental criticism” and its procedural role in the process of expanding the horizon of what a critical rationalist can argue. Popper expanded the scope of what can be rationally argued by experimenting with different ways of rationally treating hypotheses that were clearly irrefutable. At the same time he was adamant that his theory of falsification should never be abandoned. This theory was used throughout his career to navigate his many theories through his use of non-falsifiable concepts, exemplified by his late ontological writings. It is this tension in the relationship between his theorisation of the method of falsification and his non-falsifiable arguments in ontology and political philosophy that gave Popper’s thought such a distinctive quality. In tracing that relationship, this thesis will contribute to the ongoing task of interpreting Popper’s philosophical, political and moral thought. It will do so by drawing on his published texts and unpublished letters and writings to emphasise the continuity of his thought. 9 Author’s Note The central contribution that this thesis makes to scholarship on Popper’s philosophy, results from the use of Popper’s personal letters of correspondence as well as other lesser known lectures, drafts and interviews. All the unpublished material in this thesis was accessed over
Recommended publications
  • The Newsletter of March 2019 Is Here!
    28.5.2019 DRC Newsletter March 2019 Subscribe Past Issues Translate DRC Newsletter View this email in your browser March 2019 Dear subscribers to the DRC Newsletter! The newsletter of March 2019 is here! We are once again bringing information about many possibilities for cross-border cooperation and open dialogue between scientists from across Europe. We would like to highlight that the Call for Nominations for the Danubius Young Scientist Award 2019 is still open. So if you know - or you are - a promising young scientist who deals with a cross-border issue with relevance to the Danube Region, apply and/or spread the information to others. You or your colleagues can also apply for the 16th DRC Summer School on Regional Cooperation taking place in Zagreb, Croatia. Furthermore, the newsletter introduces you with other opportunities how to connect with like-minded people from different countries. Just read it! Remember, feedback and comments are always welcome! 1. Call for Nominations: Danubius Young Scientist Award 2. SAVE THE DATE: 16th DRC Summer School 3. SAVE THE DATE: DRC Annual Meeting 4. European Forum Alpbach 5. 4th International and Interdisciplinary Summer University in Budapest 6. Green. Building. Solutions. Summer University Vienna 7. Alternative Economic and Monetary Systems. Summer University Vienna 8. proESOF Call for Proposals 9. ELTE Summer University of Hungarian Language and Culture https://mailchi.mp/965c001d301b/drc-newsletter-october-1687009?e=[UNIQID] 1/17 28.5.2019 DRC Newsletter March 2019 10. USAMV Bucharest Agricultural Economics and Policy Summer Subscribe Past Issues Translate School 11. The Danube Cooperation Forum 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Would ''Direct Realism'' Resolve the Classical Problem of Induction?
    NOU^S 38:2 (2004) 197–232 Would ‘‘Direct Realism’’ Resolve the Classical Problem of Induction? MARC LANGE University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill I Recently, there has been a modest resurgence of interest in the ‘‘Humean’’ problem of induction. For several decades following the recognized failure of Strawsonian ‘‘ordinary-language’’ dissolutions and of Wesley Salmon’s elaboration of Reichenbach’s pragmatic vindication of induction, work on the problem of induction languished. Attention turned instead toward con- firmation theory, as philosophers sensibly tried to understand precisely what it is that a justification of induction should aim to justify. Now, however, in light of Bayesian confirmation theory and other developments in epistemology, several philosophers have begun to reconsider the classical problem of induction. In section 2, I shall review a few of these developments. Though some of them will turn out to be unilluminating, others will profitably suggest that we not meet inductive scepticism by trying to justify some alleged general principle of ampliative reasoning. Accordingly, in section 3, I shall examine how the problem of induction arises in the context of one particular ‘‘inductive leap’’: the confirmation, most famously by Henrietta Leavitt and Harlow Shapley about a century ago, that a period-luminosity relation governs all Cepheid variable stars. This is a good example for the inductive sceptic’s purposes, since it is difficult to see how the sparse background knowledge available at the time could have entitled stellar astronomers to regard their observations as justifying this grand inductive generalization. I shall argue that the observation reports that confirmed the Cepheid period- luminosity law were themselves ‘‘thick’’ with expectations regarding as yet unknown laws of nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Harvard University
    HARVARD UNIVERSITY ROBERT AND RENÉE BELFER CENTER FOR SCIENCE AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS 2000-2001 ANNUAL REPORT 2 Robert and Renée Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs 2000-2001 Annual Report Director’s Foreword 5 Overview From the Executive Director 7 Environment and Natural Resources Program TABLE 8 OF Harvard Information Infrastructure Project 52 CONTENTS International Security Program 71 Science, Technology and Public Policy Program 109 Strengthening Democratic Institutions Project 155 WPF Program on Intrastate Conflict, Conflict Prevention, and Conflict Resolution 177 Events 188 Publications 219 Biographies 241 Robert and Renée Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs 3 2000-2001 Annual Report 4 Robert and Renée Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs 2000-2001 Annual Report Director’s Foreword —————————————♦ For the hub of the John F. Kennedy School’s research, teaching, and training in international security affairs, environmental and resource issues, conflict prevention and resolution, and science and technology policy, the first academic year of the new century has been bracing. According to our mission statement, The Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs strives to provide leadership in advancing policy-relevant knowledge about the most important challenges of international security and other critical issues where science, technology, and international affairs intersect. BCSIA’s leadership begins with the recognition of science and technology as driving forces transforming threats and opportunities in international affairs. The Center integrates insights of social scientists, technologists, and practitioners with experience in government, diplomacy, the military, and business to address critical issues. BCSIA involvement in both the Republican and Democratic campaigns. BCSIA was privileged to have senior advisors in both camps in one of the most unforgettable American elections in recent memory.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthur Pap Archive I. Manuscripts and Typscripts I.1
    Arthur Pap Archive Inventory of the „Nachlass“ of Arthur Pap at the Institute Vienna Circle, by Christoph Limbeck-Lilienau I. Manuscripts and Typscripts I.1 Pap „Absolute Motion and the Clock Paradox“ [1953], 34 p., A4, Typscript Box 1/Folder 1 “Are Physical Magnitudes Operally Definable?” 1959, Typscript with a few handwritten corrections, 19 p., A4, 9 carbon copies. Published in: Box 1/2 Abstract for: “Are Physical Magnitudes Operally Definable?” 1956, Typscript, 3 p., A4 Box 1/3 “Are Physical Magnitudes Operationally Definable?” 1959, Typscript, 19 p., A4, Typscript, Box 1/3 “Are Physical Magnitudes Operationally Definable?” 1959, Typscript, 19 p., A4, Typscript, 8 Copies Box 1/3 “Basic Propositions, Certainty, and Intersubjective Language” [1958], Typscript, 21 p., A4 Box 1/4 “Basic Propositions, Certainty, and Intersubjective Language” [1960], Typscript, marginal handwritten corrections, 21 p., A4 Box 1/4 “Belief and Natural-Language-Intentions” No Date, Typscript, 5 p., A4 (from “Manila Folder”) Box 1/4 Abstract for: “Belief and Proposition” No Date, Typscript, 1 p., A4 Box 1/ 4 “Comments on M. Scriven´s `Certain Weaknesses in the Deductive Model of Explanation´” [1955], 5 p., A4, Typscript, Copy, (Original in the letter of M. Scriven from May 9, 1955) Scriven´s Reply is “Reply to Pap General Points-Specific Points”. Box 1/ 4 Critical Comments on Paul Weiss´ “Real Possibility” No Date, 3 p., A4, Typescript Box 1/ 4 “Mr. O´Connor on Incompatibility” [1955 or later], 4 p., A4, Typescript Box 1/ 4 Criticism of Sellars´ “On the Logic of Complex particulars” (from a letter of July 28) No Date, Typscript, 3 p., A4 (from “Manila Folder”) Box 1/4 1 “The Dispensibility of Material Implication for Applied Logic” 1959, Typescript with handwritten additions, 13 p., A4 (Contains a letter of rejection by John Rawls, see Correspondence “Rawls” (No.
    [Show full text]
  • Metaphysics Today and Tomorrow*
    1 Metaphysics Today and Tomorrow* Raphaël Millière École normale supérieure, Paris – October 2011 Translated by Mark Ohm with the assistance of Leah Orth, Jon Cogburn, and Emily Beck Cogburn “By metaphysics, I do not mean those abstract considerations of certain imaginary properties, the principal use of which is to furnish the wherewithal for endless dispute to those who want to dispute. By this science I mean the general truths which can serve as principles for the particular sciences.” Malebranche Dialogues on Metaphysics and Religion 1. The interminable agony of metaphysics Throughout the twentieth century, numerous philosophers sounded the death knell of metaphysics. Ludwig Wittgenstein, Rudolf Carnap, Martin Heidegger, Gilbert Ryle, J. L. Austin, Jacques Derrida, Jürgen Habermas, Richard Rorty, and, henceforth, Hilary Putnam: a great many tutelary figures have extolled the rejection, the exceeding, the elimination, or the deconstruction of first philosophy. All these necrological chronicles do not have the same radiance, the same seriousness, nor the same motivations, but they all agree to dismiss the discipline, which in the past was considered “the queen of the sciences”, with a violence at times comparable to the prestige it commanded at the time of its impunity. Even today, certain philosophers hastily spread the tragic news with contempt for philosophical inquiry, as if its grave solemnity bestowed upon it some obviousness. Thus, Franco Volpi writes: ‘Grand metaphysics is dead!’ is the slogan which applies to the majority of contemporary philosophers, whether continentals or of analytic profession. They all treat metaphysics as a dead dog.1 In this way, the “path of modern thought” would declare itself vociferously “anti- metaphysical and finally post-metaphysical”.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017/18 Preamble Preamble
    Annual report 2017/18 Preamble Preamble Lisa Sonnberger Franz Fischler Chairwoman of the Forum Alpbach Network President of the European Forum Alpbach Uncertainty and the revival of ‘universalisms’ seem people to actively participate at the European I‘m impressed again and again to see the hunger From working in the committees to looking to be the recurring themes of our time influenced Forum Alpbach but further aims to encourage for knowledge and the commitment brought after the hundreds of scholarship holders – the by binary thinking using conflicting terms such as young people to become active agents in their by hundreds of scholarship holders from all over representatives of the Forum Alpbach Network ‘us’ and the ‘others’. Often ‘us’ implies a benchmark societies during the year. How can we use our the world to Alpbach every year. Their fresh breathe life into the “Spirit of Alpbach” and carry it that all ‘others’ shall align themselves to and cumulative power in order to master future ideas, visions and ways of thinking shape each out into the world. This enables the many projects, elusive terms such as ‘values’ are easily dropped challenges together? Perhaps you are familiar European Forum Alpbach and make a significant initiatives and friendships born in Alpbach to take in that regard. But what are these so ubiquitously with the Marvel movies ‘Avengers’? What I want contribution to the unique atmosphere of the effect and to grow further. One such example proclaimed ‘values’? Definitions are commonly to highlight here is that behind every chapter of Forum. It’s not only us organisers who appreciate is the „My Europe - My Story“ initiative, which left in vagueness.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gnosiology As Experience of the Resurrected Christ in the Liturgical Texts of the Pentecostarion
    The Gnosiology as experience of the Resurrected Christ in the liturgical texts of the Pentecostarion CONTENT INTRODUCTION 4 The motif for choosing the theme 4 The stage of the theme`s research 5 The used method 5 The purpose of the research 5 Terminological clarifications 6 CHAPTER I. THE PENTECOSTARION – THE HYMNOGRAPHICAL IMAGE OF 11 THE STATE OF RESURRECTION IN JESUS CHRIST 1.1. The Pentecostarion – the Church`s Book of Cult 11 1.2. The Pentecostarion – the Relation Dogma – Cult – Knowledge 24 1.2.1. The Cult, Favorable Environment for Spreading the Faith and for Knowing the Dogma 27 1.2.2. The Church`s Cult, Guardian of the Dogma Against Heresy 30 1.2.3. The Dogma, the Cult and the Spiritual Knowledge 33 1.3. The Pentecostarion – the Doxological Dimension of the Knowledge 36 CHAPTER II. THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL FUNDAMENTALS OF THE ORTHODOX 51 GNOSIOLOGY MIRRORED IN PENTECOSTARION 2.1. Revelation and Knowledge 51 2.2. Image and Likeness of the Power of the Man of Knowing God 63 2.2.1. The Falling into Sin and the Image Corrupted through Passions 67 2.2.2. The Renewal of the Engulfed by Passion Image 68 2.3. Person - Communion - Knowledge 75 CHAPTER III THE CHRISTOLOGICAL FUNDAMENTALS OF THE ORTHODOX 84 GNOSIOLOGY MIRRORED IN PENTECOSTARION 1 3.1. The Man`s Healing into Christ – Premise of the Knowledge 84 3.1.1. The Embodiment of the Son of God 84 3.1.1.1. Jesus Christ True God and True Man 90 3.1.1.2. The Deification of the Human Nature into Christ 91 3.1.1.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Theoretical Analysis of Depreciation in Municipalities (Gnosiology, Ontology and Epistemology)
    Trakia Journal of Sciences, Vol. 17, Suppl. 1, pp 524-529, 2019 Copyright © 2019 Trakia University Available online at: http://www.uni-sz.bg ISSN 1313-7069 (print) ISSN 1313-3551 (online) doi:10.15547/tjs.2019.s.01.083 THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF DEPRECIATION IN MUNICIPALITIES (GNOSIOLOGY, ONTOLOGY AND EPISTEMOLOGY) D. Velikov* Department of Finance and Management, Plovdiv University "Paisii Hilendarski", Plovdiv, Bulgaria ABSTRACT The amortization charge leads to an improvement in the quality of accountability and public finance statistics. Accounting analysis is part of the information function of accounting. The aim of the publication is to analyze depreciation in municipalities and to propose a synthesis of properties and a summary of common features, trends and laws. The ontological nature of depreciation in accounting science presents the main problems solved by accounting for depreciation. Epistemological coverage of depreciation covers its origin, scope and peculiarities. The research methods are analysis and synthesis, comparison, analogy, modeling, systematization and summary, comparative and group accounting analysis. The results obtained are presented in tabular form. The conclusion is that by switching from a smaller range of the signage coverage of the unit to the depreciation in municipalities, we are targeting a wider range of sign coverage, pointing out the qualities of the different categories of depreciation in the municipalities as an internal definition and an external manifestation. Key words: depreciation, theoretical analysis, accounting, public sector, category, quality. INTRODUCTION expression of the systematic distribution of the The accrual of depreciation in the public sector depreciable value of the asset over its last life. leads to an improvement in the quality of The subject of the survey is the normative accountability and public finance statistics.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul Feyerabend
    Against Method Fourth Edition Paul Feyerabend VERSO London • New York Analytical Index Being a Sketch of the Main Argument Introdnction 1 Science is an essentially anarchic enterprise: theoretical anarchism is more humanitarian and more likely to encourage progress than its law-and-order alternatives. 1 7 This is shown both by an examination of historical episodes and by an abstract analysis of the relation between idea and action. The only principle that does not inhibit progress is: anything goes. 2 13 For example, we may use hypotheses that contradict well-confirmed theories and/or well-established experimental results. We may advance science by proceeding counterinductively. 3 17 The consistency condition which demands that new hypotheses agree with accepted theories is unreasonable because it preserves the older theory, and not the better theory. Hypotheses contradicting well-confirmed theories give us evidence that cannot be obtained in any other way. Proliferation of theories is beneficial for science, while uniformity impairs its critical power. Uniformity also endangers the free development of the individual. 4 ~ There is no idea, however ancient and absurd, that is not capable of improving our knowledge. The whole history of thought is absorbed into science and is used for improving every single theory. Nor is political interference rejected. It may be needed to overcome the chauvinism of science that resists alternatives to the status quo. xxx ANAL YTICAL INDEX 5 33 No theory ever agrees with all the facts in its domain, yet it is not always the theory that is to blame. Facts are constituted by older ideologies, and a clash between facts and theories may be proof ofprogress.
    [Show full text]
  • Security and Liberty in Europe: Policymaking in an Era of Value Conflicts
    Security and Liberty in Europe: Policymaking in an Era of Value Conflicts Exclusive MP Meeting at the European Forum Alpbach 2019 25 August 2019, Alpbach Copyright 2019: The German Marshall Fund of the United States Voßstr. 20, 10117 Berlin, Germany Editors: Chiara Rosselli, Ronith Schalast, Isotta Ricci Bitti, Caspar Kolster, Helena Wittrich | GMF contents about 1 executive summary 2 recommendations and observations 4 parliamentary perspectives 7 additional resources 9 about the mercator european dialogue THE NETWORK The Mercator European Dialogue is a network of 150+ This European network is a project by the German members of parliaments (MPs) from 25+ member Marshall Fund of the United States in cooperation states. The network convenes in different European with the Barcelona Centre for International Affairs, the cities and its members participate in regular, multilateral, Istituto Affari Internazionali in Rome, and the Hellenic and thematic activities. Across parties, across political Foundation for European and Foreign Policy in Athens ideologies, across borders. Our network of national and is funded by Stiftung Mercator and since 2017 also parliamentarians aims to be as diverse as Europe itself. by the King Baudouin Foundation. 1 about executive summary On the sidelines of the Political and Legal Symposia of the European Forum Alpbach 2019, 14 members of the Mercator European Dialogue gathered to discuss value conflicts in policymaking with a focus on systematic data collection and use by governments through new technologies. In its second co-operation with the European Forum Alpbach, the Mercator European Dialogue offered members of the network a scholarship to participate in the Political and Legal Symposia of the Forum.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE January, 2018 DANIEL GARBER
    CURRICULUM VITAE January, 2018 DANIEL GARBER Position: A. Watson Armour III University Professor of Philosophy Address: Department of Philosophy 1879 Hall Princeton University Princeton, NJ 08544-1006 Address (September 2017-July 2018) Institut d’études avancées 17, quai d’Anjou 75004 Paris France Telephone: 609-258-4307 (voice) 609-258-1502 (FAX) 609-258-4289 (Departmental office) Email: [email protected] Erdös number: 16 EDUCATIONAL RECORD Harvard University, 1967-1975 A.B. in Philosophy, 197l A.M. in Philosophy, 1974 Ph.D. in Philosophy, 1975 TEACHING EXPERIENCE Princeton University 2002- Professor of Philosophy and Associated Faculty, Program in the History of Science 2005-12 Chair, Department of Philosophy 2008-09 Old Dominion Professor 2009- Associated Faculty, Department of Politics 2009-16 Stuart Professor of Philosophy Garber -2- 2016- A. Watson Armour III University Professor of Philosophy University of Chicago 1995-2002 Lawrence Kimpton Distinguished Service Professor in Philosophy, the Committee on Conceptual and Historical Studies of Science, the Morris Fishbein Center for Study of History of Science and Medicine and the College 1986-2002 Professor 1982-86 Associate Professor (with tenure) 1975-82 Assistant Professor 1998-2002 Chairman, Committee on Conceptual and Historical Studies of Science (formerly Conceptual Foundations of Science) 2001 Acting Chairman, Department of Philosophy 1995-98 Associate Provost for Education and Research 1994-95 Chairman, Conceptual Foundations of Science 1987-94 Chairman, Department of Philosophy Harvard College 1972-75 Teaching Assistant and Tutor University of Minnesota, Spring 1979, Visiting Assistant Professor of Philosophy Johns Hopkins University, 1980-1981, Visiting Assistant Professor of Philosophy Princeton University 1982-1983 Visiting Associate Professor of Philosophy Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, 1985-1986, Member École Normale Supérieure (Lettres) (Lyon, France), November 2000, Professeur invitée.
    [Show full text]
  • One with God: Salvation As Deification and Justification PDF Book
    ONE WITH GOD: SALVATION AS DEIFICATION AND JUSTIFICATION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Veli-Matti Karkkainen | 152 pages | 01 Jan 2005 | Liturgical Press | 9780814629710 | English | Collegeville, MN, United States One with God: Salvation as Deification and Justification PDF Book Scottish Journal of Theology 63 3 : Retrieved 10 January Advanced Search Links. Bestselling Series. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans. Further information: Christian contemplation. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd. The goal of the Christian life was union with God in perfect love and holiness. Through theoria illumination with or direct experience of the Triune God , human beings come to know and experience what it means to be fully human, i. Retrieved 11 June — via Myriobiblos. Cambridge, UK: James Clarke, pp. Torrance TF. A person must fashion his life to be a mirror, a true likeness of God. Outline of Christian theology Christianity portal. In One With God Karkkainen points out that amidst all the differences between the East and West with regard to theological orientations and the language and concepts for soteriology, there is a common motif to be found: union with God. Eastern Orthodox Church. Popular Patristics Series. Joanna Leidenhag 1. Holy Things: A Liturgical Theology. In recent decades the doctrine of salvation has become a key issue in international ecumenical conversations between Lutherans and Roman Catholics and also between Lutherans and Eastern Orthodox. Part of a series on. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster. God and the Gift Risto Saarinen. For a better shopping experience, please upgrade now. A common analogy for theosis , given by the Greek fathers, is that of a metal which is put into the fire.
    [Show full text]