Recommended Guidelines for the Selection of Test Levels 2 Through 5 Bridge Railings NCHRP 22-12(03) February 10, 2014

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Recommended Guidelines for the Selection of Test Levels 2 Through 5 Bridge Railings NCHRP 22-12(03) February 10, 2014 Final Report: Recommended Guidelines for the Selection of Test Levels 2 through 5 Bridge Railings NCHRP 22-12(03) February 10, 2014 Limited Use Document This Final Report is furnished only for review by members of the NCHRP project panel and is regarded as fully privileged. Dissemination of information included herein must be approved by NCHRP. Malcolm H. Ray, P.E., Ph.D. Christine E. Carrigan, P.E., Ph.D. P.O. Box 312 12 Main Street Canton, Maine 04221 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... v List of Figures ................................................................................................................... vii Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Literature Review................................................................................................................ 3 Exemplar Crashes ........................................................................................................... 4 Crashes in the Media ................................................................................................... 4 Crashes Investigated by the National Transportation Safety Board ......................... 23 Crash Testing ................................................................................................................ 31 NCHRP Report 230 .................................................................................................. 33 1989 AASHTO Guide Specification for Bridge Railings ........................................ 33 NCHRP Report 350 .................................................................................................. 35 Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) .................................................... 36 High Containment Barriers ....................................................................................... 37 Guidelines and Specifications ....................................................................................... 41 FHWA and AASHTO ............................................................................................... 41 The States .................................................................................................................. 49 International Specifications ...................................................................................... 58 Summary ................................................................................................................... 67 Crash Data Studies ........................................................................................................ 70 FHWA Narrow Bridge Study ................................................................................... 70 NCHRP 22-08 ........................................................................................................... 72 Kansas Bridge Rail Study ......................................................................................... 73 Analysis Methods for Bridge Railing Selection ........................................................... 74 BCAP ........................................................................................................................ 75 RSAP......................................................................................................................... 78 RRRAP ..................................................................................................................... 80 Risk Analysis ............................................................................................................ 81 Conclusions ................................................................................................................... 82 Results Of Survey Of Practice .......................................................................................... 85 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 85 Survey Questions .......................................................................................................... 85 Summary ....................................................................................................................... 95 Development of Bridge Rail Selection Guidelines ........................................................... 97 Crash Data ..................................................................................................................... 97 New Jersey Median Barrier ...................................................................................... 98 i Massachusetts Median Barrier .................................................................................. 99 Washington State Median Barrier ........................................................................... 101 Pennsylvania Bridge Railing................................................................................... 102 Ohio Bridge Railing ................................................................................................ 104 Nebraska Bridge Rails ............................................................................................ 107 After Penetration Hazards ....................................................................................... 109 Summary of Crash Data .......................................................................................... 110 Encroachment ............................................................................................................. 110 Encroachment models for roads over capacity ....................................................... 111 Low-Volume Encroachments ................................................................................. 112 Annual Traffic Growth ........................................................................................... 112 Traffic Mix Considerations ..................................................................................... 112 Truck Trajectories ................................................................................................... 116 Encroachment Adjustments for Site-Specific Characteristics ................................ 128 Crash ........................................................................................................................... 130 Predicted Penetration, Rollovers and Vaults .......................................................... 130 Severity ....................................................................................................................... 135 Bridge Railing Crash Severity ................................................................................ 136 Bridge Railing Penetration Severity ....................................................................... 137 Costs ............................................................................................................................ 139 Project Life.............................................................................................................. 140 Regional Cost Variations ........................................................................................ 140 Temporal Cost Variations ....................................................................................... 146 Bridge Railing Agency Costs.................................................................................. 149 Bridge Railing Crash Costs ..................................................................................... 150 Sight Distance Considerations .................................................................................... 154 Analysis Methods........................................................................................................ 157 Benefit-Cost versus Risk Approach ........................................................................ 158 Developing the Selection Guidelines ...................................................................... 159 Selection Guidelines ....................................................................................................... 167 Bridge Rail Risk Assessment Process ........................................................................ 167 Discussion ................................................................................................................... 176 Implementation ....................................................................................................... 176 Critical Values for Design ...................................................................................... 177 Test Levels Considerations ..................................................................................... 178 ii The Risk Line .......................................................................................................... 179 Recommended Selection Guidelines Verification ...................................................... 181 Comparisons to the 1989 AASHTO Guide Specification and NCHRP 22-08 ....... 181 Example Bridge Railing In Service ........................................................................ 182 CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................................. 191 APPENDIX A: Alternative Graphs for Figure 52 ......................................................... 193 APPENDIX B: Bridge Rail Selection Guidelines ........................................................
Recommended publications
  • A Round up of Recent Activities in Our Sections
    Section Activities A round up of recent activities in our Sections AS PUBLISHED IN The Journal January 2017 Volume 135 Part 1 Sections BIRMINGHAM CROYDON & BRIGHTON DARLINGTON & NORTH EAST EDINBURGH Our online events calendar holds all GLASGOW of our Section meetings. IRISH LANCASTER, BARROW & CARLISLE You’ll also find full contact details on LONDON our website. MANCHESTER & LIVERPOOL MILTON KEYNES NORTH WALES NOTTINGHAM & DERBY SOUTH & WEST WALES THAMES VALLEY WESSEX WEST OF ENGLAND WEST YORKSHIRE YORK INSTITUTION MATTERS IRISH SECTION NOTTINGHAM & DERBY SECTION Chairman Nick West Chairman Andy Packham Secretary Joe Walsh Secretary Stacey Johnson 00 353 872075688 07587 086220 CONTACTS [email protected] [email protected] MEETING VENUE MEETING VENUES The Ashling Hotel, Parkgate Street, Dublin 8, Aston Court Hotel, opposite Derby station, Ireland; The Prince of Wales Hotel, Church Derby at 18:30 Sections BIRMINGHAM Street, Athlone, Co.Westmeath - located in the Jurys Inn Hotel, Station Street, Nottingham Co-Chairman Paul King/David Webb centre of Athlone Station; The Brookfield Suite, at 18:30 Secretary Richard Quigley Hilton Hotel, 4 Lanyon Place, Belfast - located 07715 132267 across the road from the main entrance to SOUTH & WEST WALES [email protected] Central Station Chairman Andy Franklin MEETING VENUES Secretary Andrew Wilson The Wellington Pub, 37 Bennetts Hill, LANCASTER, BARROW & 07974 809639 Birmingham, B2 5SN at 17:00 CARLISLE [email protected] 2nd Floor, Network Rail, Baskerville House,
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Correspondence & Travel Society Library Catalogue Section
    Railway Accident Reports Railway Correspondence & Travel Society Library Catalogue Section G08 Accidents including Reports Originally compiled by Paul Marks – November 1988 Updated by Andy Davies – June 2020 during the COVID-19 Lockdown Library Catalogue Section G08 ....................................................................................................................... 1 Websites ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Books on Accidents held in the Archive and Library ................................................................................... 1 Section A : Railway Accident Reports Issued by Ministry Of Transport / Department of the Environment etc: .............................................................................................................................................................. 2 Section B : Annual and Collective Reports Issued By Ministry Of Transport etc. ..................................... 40 Section C : Overseas Railways Accident Reports .................................................................................... 45 Section D : RAIB Reports .......................................................................................................................... 53 Websites Accident Reports are also available to download from the Railway Archive website: www.railwaysarchive.co.uk/ There is a separate list of reports issued by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch
    [Show full text]
  • Burgoynes Consulting Scientists and Engineers
    Burgoynes consulting scientists and engineers THE EXPERTS IN FORENSIC INVESTIGATION www.burgoynes.com Burgoynes Established nearly 50 years ago, Burgoynes is a globally renowned Partnership of forensic scientists and engineers specialising in the investigation of fires, explosions, engineering failures, marine disasters, other associated incidents and personal injuries. Being the largest organisation of its type in the UK, we provide comprehensive coverage throughout the UK, with a worldwide presence enhanced by our group offices in Dubai, Hong Kong and Singapore. We have extensive experience of investigating incidents on land, at sea and those involving the aviation industry. Our land-based investigations include incidents involving residential and commercial properties, road and rail vehicles, plant and machinery, and large process/ production sites. In more recent years we have built on our reputation to expand into, and become established in, other specialist areas of investigation, including materials, mechanical, electrical, chemical and structural engineering, escapes of fluids, including water and oil, and contamination assessment. We have been involved in the investigation of many of the most significant incidents that have occurred around the world, including many of landmark cases in the insurance industry. Our clients include major insurers and loss adjusting companies, re-insurers, marine P&I clubs, hull insurers, salvors, ship owners, major petrochemical companies, semi-conductor companies, aircraft operators and manufacturers, shipyards, government agencies and private individuals. All information provided by clients is treated in the strictest of confidence. We believe that a thorough investigation of an incident should include consideration of all the relevant background circumstances as well as the physical evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Train Drivers
    ASLEFJOURNAL FEBRUARY 2021 The magazine of the Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers & Firemen Free to members The future of our railways Cathedrals of steam – how stations transformed the capital; The train drivers ’ Kevin George sheds light on handlamps; and the fiancée of union since 1880 John Weddle remembers the driver killed in the Selby crash railway enginemen’ s tax fr ee saver plans tax fr ee savings plans for anyone who works on the railways... we don’ t mean just train drivers..! tax fr ee policies fr om 70p per day , £5 per week and £20 per month for further information call us on freephone 0800 328 9140 visit our website at www.enginemens.co.uk or write to us at Railway Enginemen's Assurance Society Limited, 727 Washwood Heath Road, Birmingham, B8 2LE @RailwayEnginemens Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authorit y. Regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authorit y. Incorporated under the Friendly Societies Act 1992 ASLEF GS Mick Whelan JOURNAL Coronavirus crisis – The magazine of the Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers & Firemen there is light at the ‘Ridership of trains will take years to end of the tunnel return to normal’ ORGIVE me! I try not to use too many railway analogies but, with the rollout of the vaccine, there is light at the end of F the tunnel. We are months away from everyone being vaccinated and, even then, life will not immediately return to normal. There will still be a need for caution, social distancing, and a gradual societal shift to engaging and being with each other.
    [Show full text]
  • RECENT RAILWAY INDUSTRY ACCIDENTS : LEARNING POINTS for the PROCESS INDUSTRIES Christopher J
    SYMPOSIUM SERIES No. 148 © 2001 IChemE RECENT RAILWAY INDUSTRY ACCIDENTS : LEARNING POINTS FOR THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES Christopher J. Beale, Ciba Specialty Chemicals, PO Box 38, Bradford, West Yorkshire. BD12 0JZ. UK. MIChemE Following a number of high profile accidents in the railway industry in recent years, there has been a large amount of public debate about rail safety. The lessons learnt from these accidents have raised issues which are applicable to the process industries, particularly regarding safety management, human factors, management of contractors and organisational structures. These issues contribute significantly to many process industry accidents. This paper reviews the press reports and published accident reports for some recent high profile accidents including the Channel Tunnel fire, the Kaprun fire, Southall, Paddington, Hatfield and Selby and identifies learning points which are relevant for preventing accidents in the process industry. learning from accidents, engineering design, emergency response, COMAH 1. INTRODUCTION. It is an unfortunate fact that many process industry accidents are similar to accidents that have happened historically in the industry or even within the same company. Recent process industry legislation, such as the Control Of Major Accident Hazards Regulations (COMAH, 1999), includes requirements for operators to learn from accidents on their sites and to review historic records of major accidents when identifying potential major accident hazard scenarios within their Safety Report. Many early accident investigations focused on the specific technical or direct human causes of the accidents. As more knowledge has been obtained in the field, so more attention has been paid to the wider issues of safety management system failures which often lie at the root cause of accidents.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Together
    Annual Return 2007 Delivering for you Network Rail helps bring the country together. We own, operate, maintain and invest in Britain’s rail network. Increasingly we are delivering improved standards of safety, reliability and efficiency. This benefits our customers and society at large. Every day. Everywhere. Contents Executive summary 1 Earthwork remediation (M28) 118 Introduction 9 Tunnel remediation (M29) 119 Targets 13 Key performance indicators (KPIs) 16 Section 5 Safety & Environment 122 Accident Frequency Rate 122 Section 1 – Operational performance and Infrastructure wrong side failures 123 stakeholder relationships 18 Level crossing misuse 124 Public performance measure (PPM) 19 Signals passed at danger (SPADs) 125 Summarised network-wide data (delays to major operators) 20 Operating irregularities 127 National data by delay category grouping 25 Criminal damage 128 Results for operating routes by delay category 29 Safety and environment enhancements 129 Asset failure 38 Customer satisfaction – passenger and freight operators 45 Section 6 – Expenditure and Efficiency 131 Supplier Satisfaction 46 Network total expenditure 131 Doing Business with Network Rail 47 Route 1 Kent 134 Joint Performance Process 47 Route 2 Brighton Main Line and Sussex 135 Route Utilisation Strategies (RUSs) 50 Route 3 South West Main Line 136 Route 4 Wessex Routes 137 Section 2 – Network capability 52 Route 5 West Anglia 138 Linespeed capability (C1) 53 Route 6 North London Line and Thameside 139 Gauge capability (C2) 58 Route 7 Great Eastern 140 Route
    [Show full text]