DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Social Summary Achwa II

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Social Summary Achwa II DLanguage: English Original: English PROJECT: DERNAN SALT & TRADING LIMITED (DSTL) COUNTRY: GHANA SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT (ESIA) F. Rodrigues (OPSD2)– Senior Task Manager OPSD.2 1791 Investment Officer R. Fusi (OPSD2), Senior Investment Officer OPSD.2 Co-Task Manager O. Owojobi (OPSD2) , Investment Project Team Officer Felix Oku Senior Environmental ONEC3 4395 Specialist Division Manager Cisse Mahib Ag. Division Manager OPSD.2 1906 Sector Director Kokeidja Diallo, Director OPSD 2147 Abdellatif Bernoussi , Acting Director , Regional Director ORWA 2705 Director TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 3 2. POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK .............................................................................. 4 2.1 RELEVANT GHANA POLICIES AND LEGISLATION .................................................................................................... 4 2.1.1 Environmental Protection Agency Act, 1994 (Act 490) ................................................................... 4 2.1.2 Environmental Assessment Regulations, 1999 (LI 1652) ................................................................ 4 2.1.3 Water Resources Commission Act, 1996 (Act 522) ......................................................................... 4 2.1.4 Minerals and Mining (Compensation and Resettlement) Regulations, 2012 (L.I. 2175) ................ 4 2.1.5 Minerals and Mining Act, 2006 (Act 703) ....................................................................................... 4 2.1.6 The Minerals and Mining (Health & Safety and Technical) Regulations, 2012 (L.I. 2182) .............. 4 2.1.7 EPA GUIDELINES ................................................................................................................................. 5 2.3 DONORS AND FINANCING INSTITUTIONS ............................................................................................................ 5 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION ........................................................................................... 6 3.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 PROJECT LOCATION ....................................................................................................................................... 7 3.3 JUSTIFICATION FOR THE PROJECT ........................................................................................................... 9 4. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ENVIRONMENT ...................................................................................... 9 4.1 PHYSICAL BASELINE ENVIRONMENT .................................................................................................................. 9 4.1.1 Ambient Air Quality and Noise levels .............................................................................................. 9 4.1.3 Soil Studies .................................................................................................................................... 10 4.1.4 Hydrology and Water quality: ....................................................................................................... 10 4.2 BIOLOGICAL BASELINE ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................................................. 10 4.2.4 Terrestrial vegetation/habitats ..................................................................................................... 10 4.2.5 Terrestrial fauna ........................................................................................................................... 10 4.3 HUMAN AND SOCIOECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................................. 10 4.3.1 Local Economy .............................................................................................................................. 11 4.3.2 Health ........................................................................................................................................... 11 4.3.3 Education ...................................................................................................................................... 11 4.4 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................................................ 11 4.4.1 Location Alternatives .................................................................................................................... 11 4.4.2 Brine Alternatives .......................................................................................................................... 11 4.4.3 Zero Project Option ....................................................................................................................... 12 5. POTENTIAL IMPACTS ............................................................................................................................ 12 6. LAND ACQUISITION AND INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT ..................................................................... 12 7. MITIGATION/ENHANCEMENT MEASURES AND COMPLEMENTARY INITIATIVES ................................... 12 7.1 ENVIRONNEMENTAL SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (ESMP) ................................................................................. 13 7.2 CLOSURE PLAN ........................................................................................................................................... 13 8. PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS AND PUBLIC DISCLOSURE .............................................................................. 10 9. CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................ 10 REFERENCES AND CONTACTS ......................................................................................................................... 10 APPENDIX A ................................................................................................................................................... 12 P a g e 1 | 29 Project Title: DSTL Project Project Number: P-GH-BAA-002 Country: Ghana Department: OPSD.2 Division: OPSD.2 Project Category: 2 1. INTRODUCTION Dernan Salt and Trading Limited (the “Company” or “DSTL”) is proposing to develop a vacuum salt Project (the “Project”). The project will utilize a state-of-the-art Multiple-Effect crystallisation system with the capacity to produce 45 mt of salt per hour on an approximately 40 acre and additional 1,000 acres of land zoned for salt production at Mankoadze and Bewadze respectively in the Gomoa West District of the Central Region of Ghana. The proposed Project is targeting an annual production of about 324,000 mt of high quality edible and industrial salt for the local market, sub-regional market and the international market especially Europe and the Americas. The production facilities and infrastructure required for the Project will comprise: Crystallisation plant; Reservoirs; Warehouse; Iodization plant; Steam boiler; Pure water plant; Office complex; Laboratory; Workers’ accommodation camps and other auxiliary infrastructure facilities for the construction and operation periods; Supporting infrastructure in the form of local roads, bridges (for stream and river crossings), aerial electrical transmission lines, workshops, fuel storage and refuelling area, water treatment facilities, waste management facilities and other workers’ facilities In accordance with the Bank’s Integrated Safeguard System (ISS) and Ghana national requirements, this project has been categorized as 2. Accordingly, this Environment &Social Management Plan (ESMP) summary has been prepared based on AfDB environmental and social (E&S) assessment guidelines and procedures for Category 2 projects. The ESMP summary starts with a presentation of a brief summary of the rationale and description of the project, followed by the applicable legal and institutional framework within the host country, Ghana. A brief description of the main environmental and social baseline conditions of the project area is given for the project components, focusing on the physical, biological and human and wider environmental receptors. Project alternative analysis have also been in terms of technical, economic, environmental and social feasibility which is followed by the most significant positive and negative impacts on the biophysical and human (socio-economic) environments. Mitigation measures proposed to boost project benefits and/or prevent, reduce, mitigate or offset any negative impact, as well as the P a g e 3 | 29 monitoring programme has also been proposed. The public consultations held, as well as additional initiatives implemented under the project, are also presented. 2. POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK The applicable national, international lender group and international conventions applicable to the project are summarized in the following sections. 2.1 Relevant Ghana Policies and legislation 2.1.1 Environmental Protection Agency Act, 1994 (Act 490) The Environmental Protection Agency Act, 1994 (Act 490) stipulates that every undertaking or project that may have an impact on the environment must be registered with EPA. The EPA has the mandate to request an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in respect of any
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents Page LIST OF ACRONYMS a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Scope of Study 1 1.2 Background – Volta River Authority 2 1.3 Proposed Aboadze-Volta Transmission Line Project (AVTP) 3 1.4 Legal, Regulatory and Policy Considerations 5 1.5 Future developments by VRA 8 2.0 Description of proposed development 10 2.1 Pre-Construction Activities 11 2.2 Construction Phase Activities 12 2.3 Operational Phase Activities 17 2.3.1 Other Operational Considerations 20 3.0 Description of Existing Environments 21 3.1 Bio-Physical Environment 21 3.1.1 Climate 21 3.1.2 Flora 25 3.1.3 Fauna 35 3.1.4 Water Resources 43 3.1.5 Geology and Soils 44 3.1.6 General Land Use 51 3.2 Socio-Economic/Cultural Environment 51 3.2.1 Methodology 53 3.2.2 Profiles of the Districts in the Project Area 54 3.2.2(a) Shama - Ahanta East Metropolitan Area 54 3.2.2(b) Komenda - Edina - Eguafo - Abirem (KEEA) District 58 i 3.2.2(c) Mfantseman District 61 3.2.2(d) Awutu-Effutu-Senya District 63 3.2.2(e) Tema Municipal Area 65 3.2.2(f) Abura-Asebu-Kwamankese 68 3.2.2(g) Ga District 71 3.2.2(h) Gomoa District 74 3.3 Results of Socio-Economic Surveys 77 (Communities, Persons and Property) 3.3.1 Information on Affected Persons and Properties 78 3.3.1.1 Age Distribution of Affected Persons 78 3.3.1.2 Gender Distribution of Affected Persons 79 3.3.1.3 Marital Status of Affected Persons 80 3.3.1.4 Ethnic Composition of Afected Persons 81 3.3.1.5 Household Size/Dependents of Affected Persons 81 3.3.1.6 Religious backgrounds of Affected Persons 82 3.3.2 Economic Indicators
    [Show full text]
  • An Epidemiological Profile of Malaria and Its Control in Ghana
    An Epidemiological Profile of Malaria and its Control in Ghana Report prepared by National Malaria Control Programme, Accra, Ghana & University of Health & Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana & AngloGold Ashanti Malaria Control Program, Obuasi, Ghana & World Health Organization, Country Programme, Accra, Ghana & The INFORM Project Department of Public Health Research Kenya Medical Research Institute - Wellcome Trust Progamme Nairobi, Kenya Version 1.0 November 2013 Acknowledgments The authors are indebted to the following individuals from the MPHD, KEMRI-Oxford programme: Ngiang-Bakwin Kandala, Caroline Kabaria, Viola Otieno, Damaris Kinyoki, Jonesmus Mutua and Stella Kasura; we are also grateful to the help provided by Philomena Efua Nyarko, Abena Asamoabea, Osei-Akoto and Anthony Amuzu of the Ghana Statistical Service for help providing parasitological data on the MICS4 survey; Catherine Linard for assistance on modelling human population settlement; and Muriel Bastien, Marie Sarah Villemin Partow, Reynald Erard and Christian Pethas-Magilad of the WHO archives in Geneva. We acknowledge in particular all those who have generously provided unpublished data, helped locate information or the geo-coordinates of data necessary to complete the analysis of malaria risk across Ghana: Collins Ahorlu, Benjamin Abuaku, Felicia Amo-Sakyi, Frank Amoyaw, Irene Ayi, Fred Binka, David van Bodegom, Michael Cappello, Daniel Chandramohan, Amanua Chinbua, Benjamin Crookston, Ina Danquah, Stephan Ehrhardt, Johnny Gyapong, Maragret Gyapong, Franca Hartgers, Debbie Humphries, Juergen May, Seth Owusu-Agyei, Kwadwo Koram, Margaret Kweku, Frank Mockenhaupt, Philip Ricks, Sylvester Segbaya, Harry Tagbor and Mitchell Weiss. The authors also acknowledge the support and encouragement provided by the RBM Partnership, Shamwill Issah and Alistair Robb of the UK government's Department for International Development (DFID), Claude Emile Rwagacondo of the West African RBM sub- regional network and Thomas Teuscher of RBM, Geneva.
    [Show full text]
  • Ghana Marine Canoe Frame Survey 2016
    INFORMATION REPORT NO 36 Republic of Ghana Ministry of Fisheries and Aquaculture Development FISHERIES COMMISSION Fisheries Scientific Survey Division REPORT ON THE 2016 GHANA MARINE CANOE FRAME SURVEY BY Dovlo E, Amador K, Nkrumah B et al August 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................... 2 LIST of Table and Figures .................................................................................................................... 3 Tables............................................................................................................................................... 3 Figures ............................................................................................................................................. 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 BACKGROUND 1.2 AIM OF SURVEY ............................................................................................................................. 5 2.0 PROFILES OF MMDAs IN THE REGIONS ......................................................................................... 5 2.1 VOLTA REGION .......................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 GREATER ACCRA REGION .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Awutu-Effutu-Senya District
    University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh The S o c io -E c o n o m ic Effects o f C o m m er cia l Pin ea pple Fa rm in g o n Farm Em plo yees a n d C om m unities in THE AWUTU-EFFUTU-SENYA DISTRICT C ollins O sae ID#: 10174261 This D issertation is S ubm itted t o the Un iv e r sity o f G h a n a , L e g o n in P a r t ia l F u lfilm en t o f the R e q u ir em en t f o r the A w a r d o f M A D e v e lo p m e n t S tu dies D e g r e e May 2005 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh (J374483 $2>V£-Osl bite, C-\ University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh D e c l a r a t io n I hereby declare that except for acknowledged references, this work is the result of my own research. It has never been presented anywhere, either in part or in its entirety, for the award of any degree. Collins Osae Prof. John Kwasi Anarfi Main Supervisor University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh D e d ic a t io n I dedicate this work to all young people desiring to maximise their academic potentials through higher education. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh A cknowledgments I remain forever grateful to God for granting me this rare opportunity to unearth a hidden potential.
    [Show full text]
  • SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT PROJECT (SFMP) Monitoring on Communication Campaigns Report
    SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT PROJECT (SFMP) Monitoring on Communication Campaigns Report FEBRUARY, 2017 This publication is available electronically in the following locations: The Coastal Resources Center http://www.crc.uri.edu/projects_page/ghanasfmp/ Ghanalinks.org https://ghanalinks.org/elibrary search term: SFMP USAID Development Clearing House https://dec.usaid.gov/dec/content/search.aspx search term: Ghana SFMP For more information on the Ghana Sustainable Fisheries Management Project, contact: USAID/Ghana Sustainable Fisheries Management Project Coastal Resources Center Graduate School of Oceanography University of Rhode Island 220 South Ferry Rd. Narragansett, RI 02882 USA Tel: 401-874-6224 Fax: 401-874-6920 Email: [email protected] Citation: Development Action Association. (2017). Monitoring on Communication Campaigns Report. The USAID/Ghana Sustainable Fisheries Management Project (SFMP). Narragansett, RI: Coastal Resources Center, Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island and Development Action Association. GH2014_COM053_DAA. 31 pp. Authority/Disclaimer: Prepared for USAID/Ghana under Cooperative Agreement (AID-641-A-15-00001), awarded on October 22, 2014 to the University of Rhode Island, and entitled the USAID/Ghana Sustainable Fisheries Management Project (SFMP). This document is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The views expressed and opinions contained in this report are those of the SFMP team and are not intended as statements of policy of either USAID or the cooperating organizations. As such, the contents of this report are the sole responsibility of the SFMP team and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. Cover photo: Some staff of DAA engaging in a radio discussion on Post-harvest and Child Labor and Trafficking (CLaT).
    [Show full text]
  • 4880 Volume 11 No. 3 May 2011 INSECTS OBSERVED ON
    Volume 11 No. 3 May 2011 INSECTS OBSERVED ON COWPEA FLOWERS IN THREE DISTRICTS IN THE CENTRAL REGION OF GHANA Hordzi WHK*1 Wisdom Hordzi *Corresponding author email: [email protected] Or [email protected] 1Institute for Educational Development and Extension; University of Education, Winneba P.O. Box 25, Winneba, Ghana. 4880 Volume 11 No. 3 May 2011 ABSTRACT Globally, it has been estimated that more than 100,000 species of wild plants depend on insects for pollination and reproduction. In Africa, and for that matter Ghana, not much is known about crop pollinators, especially legumes such as cowpea. In Ghana, little is known about even insects that visit the cowpea flowers. However, if the insects that visit the cowpea flowers are known it would serve as a platform to investigate insects that can possibly cause pollination in cowpea. Hence, this study was undertaken to verify the types of insects that visit cowpea flowers in three districts in the Central Region of Ghana. As a result, insects that visited cowpea flowers on surveyed, and the researcher’s own established farms were observed on the petals, tip of the stigma and inside the flowers. Samples of insects collected were identified. Also, percentage frequency of occurrence of the insects on the various parts of the flowers was determined. Differences between total frequencies were determined using chi square (χ²) analysis. The main insects observed on the cowpea flowers were bees such as Apis mellifera, Ceratina sp, Megachile sp, Xylocopa calens, Xylocopa imitator, Braussepis sp., .Lipotriches sp., Melecta sp and Amegilla sp. and other insects, such as thrips, flies, butterflies / moths, beetles, and Dysdercus sp.
    [Show full text]
  • SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT PROJECT (SFMP) Post Harvest Loss Reduction Study
    SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT PROJECT (SFMP) Post Harvest Loss Reduction Study October 2015 This publication is available electronically on the Coastal Resources Center’s website at http://www.crc.uri.edu/projects_page/ghanasfmp/ For more information on the Ghana Sustainable Fisheries Management Project, contact: USAID/Ghana Sustainable Fisheries Management Project Coastal Resources Center Graduate School of Oceanography University of Rhode Island 220 South Ferry Rd. Narragansett, RI 02882 USA Tel: 401-874-6224 Fax: 401-874-6920 Email: [email protected] Citation: Dapaah, G., Samey, B. (2015). Post Harvesting Loss Reduction Study Report. The USAID/Ghana Sustainable Fisheries Management Project (SFMP). Narragansett, RI: Coastal Resources Center, Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island and SNV Netherlands Development Organization. GH2014_ACT016_SNV. 90 pp. Authority/Disclaimer: Prepared for USAID/Ghana under Cooperative Agreement (AID-641-A-15-00001) awarded on October 22, 2014 to the University of Rhode Island and entitled; the USAID/Ghana Sustainable Fisheries Management Project (SFMP). This document is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The views expressed and opinions contained in this report are those of the SFMP team and are not intended as statements of policy of either USAID or the cooperating organizations. As such, the contents of this report are the sole responsibility of the SFMP Project team and do not necessarily reflect
    [Show full text]
  • University of Ghana Hydrogeochemical Studies
    University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh UNIVERSITY OF GHANA HYDROGEOCHEMICAL STUDIES OF GROUNDWATER IN THE SOUTHWESTERN COASTAL DISTRICTS OF THE CENTRAL REGION, GHANA. BY JERRY AYIMAH YAO (10393866) A DISSERTATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF GHANA, LEGON IN THE PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE AWARD OF MSC GROUNDWATER RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT DEGREE. MARCH 2014 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh DECLARATION I do declare that, except for the references to other people‘s work which have been cited, this work submitted as a dissertation work to the Department of Earth Science, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana for a degree of Master of Science in Groundwater Resource Development is the result of my own research and has not been presented for any degree. ……………………………… Jerry Ayimah Yao ……………………………….. Dr. T. E. K. Armah (Principal Supervisor) Dept. of Earth Science University of Ghana-Legon ……………………………… Dr. L. P. Chegbeleh (Co-Supervisor) Dept. of Earth Science University of Ghana-Legon University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh ABSTRACT The hydrogeochemical data of groundwater of southwestern coastal Districts of the Central Region of Ghana were examined to determine the main factors controlling the groundwater chemistry and study the resultant water type formed in order to determine the suitability of the water for different uses. Different geochemical interpretation methods were used to identify the geochemical characteristics. The pH values of groundwater samples showed that 36 samples had pH values below lower limit of 6.5 WHO (2011). Based on TH, groundwater quality ranges from soft to very hard. The hardness in the study was adduced to be from sedimentary rocks seepage and runoff which may be aggravated by detergents and soaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Campaigns on Child Labor and Trafficking
    SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT PROJECT (SFMP) Radio Campaigns on Child Labor and Trafficking SEPTEMBER, 2017 This publication is available electronically in the following locations: The Coastal Resources Center http://www.crc.uri.edu/projects_page/ghanasfmp/ Ghanalinks.org https://ghanalinks.org/elibrary search term: SFMP USAID Development Clearing House https://dec.usaid.gov/dec/content/search.aspx search term: Ghana SFMP For more information on the Ghana Sustainable Fisheries Management Project, contact: USAID/Ghana Sustainable Fisheries Management Project Coastal Resources Center Graduate School of Oceanography University of Rhode Island 220 South Ferry Rd. Narragansett, RI 02882 USA Tel: 401-874-6224 Fax: 401-874-6920 Email: [email protected] Citation: Friends of the Nation. (2017). Radio Campaign on Child Labor and Trafficking. The USAID/Ghana Sustainable Fisheries Management Project (SFMP). Narragansett, RI: Coastal Resources Center, Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island and Friends of the Nation. GH2014_COM049_FoN. 36 pp. Authority/Disclaimer: Prepared for USAID/Ghana under Cooperative Agreement (AID-641-A-15-00001), awarded on October 22, 2014 to the University of Rhode Island, and entitled the USAID/Ghana Sustainable Fisheries Management Project (SFMP). This document is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The views expressed and opinions contained in this report are those of the SFMP team and are not intended as statements of policy of either USAID or the cooperating organizations. As such, the contents of this report are the sole responsibility of the SFMP team and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.
    [Show full text]
  • The Operationalization of the Dlrev Software for Improved Revenue Mobilization at Local Government Level: a Cost-Benefit Analysis
    THE OPERATIONALIZATION OF THE DLREV SOFTWARE FOR IMPROVED REVENUE MOBILIZATION AT LOCAL GOVERNMENT LEVEL: A COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS GOVERNANCE FOR INCLUSIVE DEVELOPMENT / SUPPORT FOR DECENTRALISATION REFORMS (SFDR) DEUTSCHE GESELLSCHAFT FÜR INTERNATIONALE ZUSAMMENARBEIT (GIZ) GMBH NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING COMMISSION COPENHAGEN CONSENSUS CENTER © 2020 Copenhagen Consensus Center [email protected] www.copenhagenconsensus.com This work has been produced as a part of the Ghana Priorities project. Some rights reserved This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). Under the Creative Commons Attribution license, you are free to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt this work, including for commercial purposes, under the following conditions: Attribution Please cite the work as follows: #AUTHOR NAME#, #PAPER TITLE#, Ghana Priorities, Copenhagen Consensus Center, 2020. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0. Third-party-content Copenhagen Consensus Center does not necessarily own each component of the content contained within the work. If you wish to re-use a component of the work, it is your responsibility to determine whether permission is needed for that re-use and to obtain permission from the copyright owner. Examples of components can include, but are not limited to, tables, figures, or images. PRELIMINARY DRAFT AS OF MAY 18, 2020 The operationalization of the dLRev software for improved revenue mobilization at local government level: a cost-benefit analysis Ghana Priorities Governance For Inclusive Development / Support for Decentralisation Reforms (SfDR), Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Copenhagen Consensus Center Academic Abstract Revenue mobilization and management are critical to local government service delivery. Whereas traditional practices emphasized personal interactions and manual record- keeping, geospatial data, internet and information networks have the power to streamline these municipal processes.
    [Show full text]
  • SUSU COLLECTION in GHANA by Kweku A. Opoku-Agyemang
    THE POLITICAL AND BEHAVIORAL FOUNDATIONS OF INCLUSIVE ECONOMIC INSTITUTIONS: SUSU COLLECTION IN GHANA by Kweku A. Opoku-Agyemang A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Development) at the UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON 2012 Date of final oral examination: 5/15/12 This dissertation is approved by the following members of the Final Oral Committee: Jeremy Foltz, Associate Professor, Agricultural and Applied Economics Aili Tripp, Professor, Political Science Scott Straus, Professor, Political Science Gay Seidman, Professor, Sociology Jennifer Alix-Garcia, Assistant Professor, Agricultural and Applied Economics © Copyright by Kweku A. Opoku-Agyemang 2012 All Rights Reserved i For my parents, and for Kwabena and Maame Adwoa. Ewuradze yε da w’ase. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am grateful for so much from so many. Thank God for wonderful experiences and friends, old and new, all treasures. I am very grateful to my dissertation supervisor, Jeremy Foltz for his help in refining my ideas, his warmth and patience, and most of all, his generosity. I also thank my dissertation committee members, Aili Tripp, Scott Straus, Gay Seidman and Jennifer Alix-Garcia for their helpful suggestions, advice and support. I thank my undergraduate advisor, D.A. Laryea, and my secondary school teachers Robert Akpalu and Mr. Asare for much inspiration. My dissertation field work in Ghana went much smoother than I dared hope thanks to too many people to list here. Yet I must thank John V. Mensah for hosting me at the Institute for Development Studies of the University of Cape Coast and his helpful advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Overview Gomoa West District Assembly
    TABLE OF CONTENTS PART A: STRATEGIC OVERVIEW GOMOA WEST DISTRICT ASSEMBLY ............... 3 1.0 BRIEF INTRODUCTION OF THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE DISTRICT ........ 3 2.0 POLICY OBJECTIVES ....................................................................................... 3 3.0 VISION ............................................................................................................... 3 4.0 GOAL ................................................................................................................. 3 5.0 MISSION ............................................................................................................ 4 6.0 CORE FUNCTIONS ........................................................................................... 4 7.0 DISTRICT ECONOMY ....................................................................................... 4 8.0 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE PERFORMANCE .......................................... 7 9.0 KEY ACHIEVEMENTS (2020) ......................................................................... 10 10.0 POLICY OUTCOME INDICATORS AND TARGETS ....................................... 18 PART B: BUDGET PROGRAMME SUMMARY ........................................................... 19 PROGRAMME 1: MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION ........................................ 19 PROGRAMME 2: INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY AND MANAGEMENT ................... 29 PROGRAMME 3: SOCIAL SERVICES DELIVERY....................................................... 36 PROGRAMME4: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ..........................................................
    [Show full text]