DOCSLIB.ORG

Laboratory Technical Framework Volume 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Laboratory Technical Framework Volume 2 GMSIH, HPRIM and JAHIS Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise Laboratory Technical Framework 10 Volume 2 (LTF-2) Transactions 20 Revision 1.2 –Final Text February 27, 2005 Copyright © 2003: GMSIH, HPRIM, IHE-J, JAHIS IHE Laboratory Technical Framework, vol. 2: Transactions Contents 1 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 RATIONALE FOR THE CHOICE OF THE STANDARD TO BE USED............................................................... 4 2 CONVENTIONS......................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 THE GENERIC IHE TRANSACTION MODEL............................................................................................ 5 2.2 HL7 PROFILING CONVENTIONS............................................................................................................ 5 30 2.2.1 Static definition - message level...................................................................................................... 5 2.2.2 Static definition - segment level ...................................................................................................... 6 2.3 HL7 IMPLEMENTATION NOTES ............................................................................................................ 8 2.3.1 Network Guidelines......................................................................................................................... 8 2.3.2 Message Granularity ...................................................................................................................... 8 2.3.3 Acknowledgement Modes................................................................................................................ 8 2.3.4 ACK: General Acknowledgement Message .................................................................................... 8 2.3.5 IHE Laboratory Technical Framework acknowledgement policies................................................ 9 2.3.6 Identifier Data Types .................................................................................................................... 10 2.3.6.1 EI Data Type.......................................................................................................................................10 40 2.3.6.2 CX Data Type .....................................................................................................................................11 3 COMMON MESSAGE SEGMENTS FOR LABORATORY TECHNICAL FRAMEWORK ......... 12 3.1 MSH - MESSAGE HEADER SEGMENT ................................................................................................. 12 3.2 MSA - MESSAGE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT SEGMENT............................................................................. 15 3.3 ERR - ERROR SEGMENT ..................................................................................................................... 15 3.4 NTE - NOTES AND COMMENT SEGMENT ............................................................................................ 16 3.5 PID - PATIENT IDENTIFICATION SEGMENT ......................................................................................... 17 3.6 PV1 - PATIENT VISIT SEGMENT.......................................................................................................... 18 3.7 ORC COMMON ORDER SEGMENT ...................................................................................................... 19 3.8 TQ1 - TIMING QUANTITY SEGMENT .................................................................................................. 22 50 3.9 SPM - SPECIMEN SEGMENT ............................................................................................................... 23 3.10 SAC CONTAINER DETAIL SEGMENT .................................................................................................. 29 3.11 OBX - OBSERVATION/RESULT SEGMENT .......................................................................................... 30 3.12 CORRELATIONS OF STATUS BETWEEN ORC, OBR, OBX ................................................................... 34 3.12.1 Semantics of the main status code associations ....................................................................... 34 3.12.2 Status transition diagrams ....................................................................................................... 35 3.12.2.1 ORC-5: Order status ...........................................................................................................................35 3.12.2.2 OBR-25: Order Result status ..............................................................................................................35 3.12.2.3 OBX-11: Obsevation Result Status.....................................................................................................36 3.12.3 Relationship between the 3 status fields................................................................................... 36 60 4 TRANSACTION LAB-1 : PLACER ORDER MANAGEMENT......................................................... 37 4.1 SCOPE................................................................................................................................................. 37 4.2 USE CASE ROLES................................................................................................................................ 37 4.3 REFERENCED STANDARDS .................................................................................................................. 38 4.4 INTERACTION DIAGRAMS.................................................................................................................... 38 4.4.1 Normal process of a placer order................................................................................................. 39 4.4.2 Cancellation of an order by the Order Placer.............................................................................. 40 4.4.3 Cancellation of an order initiated by the Order Filler ................................................................. 40 4.5 MESSAGES STATIC DEFINITIONS ......................................................................................................... 41 4.5.1 Available HL7 2.5 structures for OML message........................................................................... 41 70 4.5.2 Restrictions on OML message for transaction LAB-1 .................................................................. 41 4.5.3 OML^O21 static definition............................................................................................................ 42 4.5.4 ORL^O22 static definition ............................................................................................................ 43 4.5.5 OML^O33 static definition............................................................................................................ 44 4.5.6 ORL^O34 static definition ............................................................................................................ 45 4.5.7 OML^O35 static definition............................................................................................................ 46 4.5.8 ORL^O36 static definition ............................................................................................................ 47 4.5.9 Specific segments description for transaction LAB-1 ................................................................... 48 4.5.9.1 OBR - Observation Request Segment.................................................................................................48 5 TRANSACTION LAB-2: FILLER ORDER MANAGEMENT ........................................................... 52 Rev. 1.1–Final Text 08/07/2004 1 Copyright © 2003: GMSIH, HPRIM, IHE-J, JAHIS IHE Laboratory Technical Framework, vol. 2: Transactions 80 5.1 SCOPE................................................................................................................................................. 52 5.2 USE CASE ROLES................................................................................................................................ 52 5.3 REFERENCED STANDARDS .................................................................................................................. 52 5.4 INTERACTION DIAGRAMS.................................................................................................................... 53 5.4.1 Process of a filler order ................................................................................................................ 53 5.5 MESSAGES STATIC DEFINITIONS ......................................................................................................... 54 5.5.1 Available HL7 2.5 structures for OML message........................................................................... 54 5.5.2 Restrictions on OML message for transaction LAB-2 .................................................................. 54 5.5.3 OML and ORL messages static definition..................................................................................... 54 5.5.4 Specific segments description for transaction LAB-2 ................................................................... 54 90 5.5.4.1 OBR - Observation Request Segment.................................................................................................54 6 TRANSACTION LAB-3: ORDER RESULTS MANAGEMENT.......................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Australian Pathology Messaging - Localisation of HL7 Version 2.4
    Australian Pathology Messaging - Localisation of HL7 Version 2.4 Sponsored by: The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA)/HL7 Australia HL7 Australia Orders and Observations Co-chairs: Michael Legg, RCPA and Michael Legg & Associates Andrew McIntyre, Medical Objects Editors Eric Browne, Montage Systems David McKillop, Australian Digital Health Agency Jared Davison, Medical Objects Donna Moore, RCPA Joint Copyright © 2016 Health Level Seven International ® and Health Level Seven Australia Inc ABN 35 556 933 588 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. The reproduction of this material in any form is strictly forbidden without the written permission of the publishers. HL7 International and Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International. Questions or comments regarding this document should be directed to Michael Legg ( [email protected]) or Andrew McIntyre ( a [email protected]) Table of Contents 1 Introduction 2 Patient Administration for Pathology 3 Datatypes 4 Observation Reporting 5 Observation Ordering 6 Identifiers Appendix 1 Parsing HL7v2 Appendix 2 Rendering of reports and display format Appendix 3 Common Errors Appendix 4 HL7 Code Tables Appendix 5 Conformance statements Appendix 6 Example messages Index of Tables Table 1-1. Message Element Attributes Table 1-2. Usage Conformance Testing Recommendations Table 6-1. Identifiers examples Table of Figures Figure 2-1. HL7 message segments Figure 3-1. HL7 data types by category Figure 3-2. Subcomponents of order sequences Figure 5-1. RU and RO usage (example) Figure 5-2. RQ and RO usage (example) Figure 5-3. Example of two child orders 1 Introduction Australian Pathology Messaging - Localisation of HL7 Version 2.4, Release 1 is the Australian localisation of the HL7 V2 Laboratory ordering and result reporting specification.
    [Show full text]
  • ISO Basic Latin Alphabet
    ISO basic Latin alphabet The ISO basic Latin alphabet is a Latin-script alphabet and consists of two sets of 26 letters, codified in[1] various national and international standards and used widely in international communication. The two sets contain the following 26 letters each:[1][2] ISO basic Latin alphabet Uppercase Latin A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z alphabet Lowercase Latin a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z alphabet Contents History Terminology Name for Unicode block that contains all letters Names for the two subsets Names for the letters Timeline for encoding standards Timeline for widely used computer codes supporting the alphabet Representation Usage Alphabets containing the same set of letters Column numbering See also References History By the 1960s it became apparent to thecomputer and telecommunications industries in the First World that a non-proprietary method of encoding characters was needed. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) encapsulated the Latin script in their (ISO/IEC 646) 7-bit character-encoding standard. To achieve widespread acceptance, this encapsulation was based on popular usage. The standard was based on the already published American Standard Code for Information Interchange, better known as ASCII, which included in the character set the 26 × 2 letters of the English alphabet. Later standards issued by the ISO, for example ISO/IEC 8859 (8-bit character encoding) and ISO/IEC 10646 (Unicode Latin), have continued to define the 26 × 2 letters of the English alphabet as the basic Latin script with extensions to handle other letters in other languages.[1] Terminology Name for Unicode block that contains all letters The Unicode block that contains the alphabet is called "C0 Controls and Basic Latin".
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution to the Federation of the Asynchronous Smartsantander Service Layer Within the European Fed4fire Context
    UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA Master Degree in Telecommunication Engineering Contribution to the Federation of the asynchronous SmartSantander service layer within the European Fed4FIRE context. Advisor Student Michele Zorzi ala Leo Turi Co-Advisors Luis Muñoz Pablo Sotres Department of Information Engineering Academic Year 2014/2015 13th October, 2015 To my parents. For all they do, all they go through while I am away, and for all the love they give me. Every time, everywhere I am. I love you. To Pippo, Matt, Fede, Gi and Eleo. And to Gabb and Marco, newly found. You’re the brothers and sisters I never had. I’m glad I met you all. To the "malvagi", our beautiful and varied TLC group. I hope we won’t lose contact in the next years, for I would miss you all deeply. You were the best classmates ever. To all the guys of the TLMAT lab: JuanRa, Rafa, Carmen, Luisco, David, Jabo, Javi, Laura, Nacho, Pablo Martinez y Pablo Garrido (el Aleman!), Vero, Jose, Jesus. To Ramon Aguero, Luis Sánchez and Jorge. You were the warmest hosts I could ever find. And, last but not least, To Pablo Sotres, who was my tutor at Unican, helped me write my thesis, and always found time to assist me (Sundays and Holidays as well). I’m happy your eternal cough ceased way before I left. ∼ You have my deepest thanks. Finally, I’d like to acknowledge the guide of Prof. Zorzi and Prof. Muñoz. Their words and trust have been fundamental during this important experience. “It’s the questions we can’t answer that teach us the most.
    [Show full text]
  • The File Cmfonts.Fdd for Use with Latex2ε
    The file cmfonts.fdd for use with LATEX 2".∗ Frank Mittelbach Rainer Sch¨opf 2019/12/16 This file is maintained byA theLTEX Project team. Bug reports can be opened (category latex) at https://latex-project.org/bugs.html. 1 Introduction This file contains the external font information needed to load the Computer Modern fonts designed by Don Knuth and distributed with TEX. From this file all .fd files (font definition files) for the Computer Modern fonts, both with old encoding (OT1) and Cork encoding (T1) are generated. The Cork encoded fonts are known under the name ec fonts. 2 Customization If you plan to install the AMS font package or if you have it already installed, please note that within this package there are additional sizes of the Computer Modern symbol and math italic fonts. With the release of LATEX 2", these AMS `extracm' fonts have been included in the LATEX font set. Therefore, the math .fd files produced here assume the presence of these AMS extensions. For text fonts in T1 encoding, the directive new selects the new (version 1.2) DC fonts. For the text fonts in OT1 and U encoding, the optional docstrip directive ori selects a conservatively generated set of font definition files, which means that only the basic font sizes coming with an old LATEX 2.09 installation are included into the \DeclareFontShape commands. However, on many installations, people have added missing sizes by scaling up or down available Metafont sources. For example, the Computer Modern Roman italic font cmti is only available in the sizes 7, 8, 9, and 10pt.
    [Show full text]
  • And Hepatitis Delta Virus
    Ai)ë' AND HEPATITIS DELTA VIRUS. Tom Bernard MACNAUGHTON B. Sc (Hons) Division of Medical Virology lnstitute of Medical and Veterinary Science ADEI.AIDE. South Australia A thesis submitted to the University of Adelaide in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 1990. CONTENTS. SU M MARY DECLARATION ACKNOWLEDG MENTS PUBLICATIONS RESULTING AB BREVIATIONS CHAPTER f : INTRODUCTION PREFACE. 1.1 oVERVIEW. A Hepatitis B Virus: Historical Perspectives. B Pathogenesis of HBV lnfection. C Animal Models of HBV. D ln Vitro Models of Hepadnavirus lnfection. 1.2 PARTICLES ASSOCIATED WITH HBV INFECTION. A Filaments and Spheres. B Hepatitis B Virion. 1.3 HEPADNAVIRUS GENOME ORGANISATION. A Genome Structure B Open Reading Frames and Their Protein Products. C Control Elements and RNA Transcription. 1.4 REPLICATION STRATEGY OF HEPADNAVIRUSES. A Adsorption. B Uncoating to Synthesis of cccDNA. C RNA Synthesis. D DNA Synthesis. E Envelopment and Secretion. F lntracellular Amplification of cccDNA. 1.5 HEPATITIS DELTA VIRUS. A Overview. B HDV RNA. C Hepatitis Delta Antigen. D HDV RNA Replication. 1.6 AIMS OF THESIS. CHAPTER 2: MATERIALS AND METHODS. 2.1 EUKARYOTIC CELL CULTURES. A Media. B Culture Methods. C Nucleotide lncorporation Assays. 2.2 PROKARYOTIC CELL CULTURE. A Media and Cells. B Preparation of Competent Cells. ¡i 2.3 CLONING. A Vec'tors and Plasmids. B Phenol Extraction and Ethanol Precipitation of Nucleic acids. C DNA Modifying Enzymes. D Agarose Gel Electrophoresis. E Transformation and Plasmid Amplification. 2.4 TRANSFECTION. A Adherent Cell Technique. B Suspension Cell Technique. C RNA Transfection. D Subcloning. E G418 Titration.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2015/103438 A2 9 July 2015 (09.07.2015) W P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2015/103438 A2 9 July 2015 (09.07.2015) W P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, C07K 16/18 (2006.01) DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, (21) International Application Number: KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, PCT/US20 14/073088 MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, (22) International Filing Date: PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, 3 1 December 2014 (3 1.12.2014) SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (25) Filing Language: English (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (26) Publication Language: English kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (30) Priority Data: GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, 61/964,383 2 January 2014 (02.01 .2014) US TZ, UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, TJ, TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, (71) Applicant: GENELUX CORPORATION [US/US]; 3030 DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, Bunker Hill Street, Suite 310, San Diego, CA 92109 (US).
    [Show full text]
  • Somatostatin-Positive Interneurons in the Dentate Gyrus of Mice Provide
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Somatostatin-positive interneurons in the dentate gyrus of mice provide local- and long-range septal synaptic inhibition Mei Yuan1,2†, Thomas Meyer1†, Christoph Benkowitz1, Shakuntala Savanthrapadian1, Laura Ansel-Bollepalli3, Angelica Foggetti3, Peer Wulff3, Pepe Alcami1, Claudio Elgueta1, Marlene Bartos1* 1Systemic and Cellular Neurophysiology, Institute for Physiology I, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; 2Faculty for Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; 3Institute for Physiology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany Abstract Somatostatin-expressing-interneurons (SOMIs) in the dentate gyrus (DG) control formation of granule cell (GC) assemblies during memory acquisition. Hilar-perforant-path- associated interneurons (HIPP cells) have been considered to be synonymous for DG-SOMIs. Deviating from this assumption, we show two functionally contrasting DG-SOMI-types. The classical feedback-inhibitory HIPPs distribute axon fibers in the molecular layer. They are engaged by converging GC-inputs and provide dendritic inhibition to the DG circuitry. In contrast, SOMIs with axon in the hilus, termed hilar interneurons (HILs), provide perisomatic inhibition onto GABAergic cells in the DG and project to the medial septum. Repetitive activation of glutamatergic inputs onto HIPP cells induces long-lasting-depression (LTD) of synaptic transmission but long-term- potentiation (LTP) of synaptic signals in HIL cells. Thus, LTD in HIPPs may assist flow of spatial information from the entorhinal cortex to the DG, whereas LTP in HILs may facilitate the temporal coordination of GCs with activity patterns governed by the medial septum. *For correspondence: marlene. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.21105.001 [email protected]. de †These authors contributed equally to this work Introduction Competing interest: See The DG is situated between the entorhinal cortex and the CA3 area of the hippocampus, forming page 20 the first stage of the classical trisynaptic circuit (Andersen et al., 1971; Eichenbaum, 1993; Lis- man, 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Coupling of Adult-Born Granule Cells to Parvalbumin and Somatostatin Interneurons
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/598615; this version posted May 15, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Differential coupling of adult-born granule cells to parvalbumin and somatostatin interneurons Ayelén I. Groisman*, Sung M. Yang* and Alejandro F. Schinder (*) Equally contriButing authors Laboratorio de Plasticidad Neuronal Fundación Instituto Leloir Av. Patricias Argentinas 435 C1405BWE – Buenos Aires Argentina Correspondence should be addressed to: [email protected] bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/598615; this version posted May 15, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. ABSTRACT The dentate gyrus of the hippocampus is dominated by a strong GABAergic tone that maintains sparse levels of activity. Adult neurogenesis disrupts this balance through the continuous addition of neW granule cells (GCs) that display high excitability While develop and connect Within the preexisting host circuit. The dynamics of the connectivity map for developing GCs in the local inhiBitory networks remains unknown. We used optogenetics to study afferent and efferent synaptogenesis between neW GCs and GABAergic interneurons eXpressing parvalbumin (PV-INs) and somatostatin (SST-INs). Inputs from PV-INs targeted the soma and remained immature until they greW abruptly in >4-week-old GCs.
    [Show full text]
  • Benchmark and Survey of Automated Machine Learning Frameworks
    Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 70 (2021) 409-474 Submitted 12/2019; published 01/2021 Benchmark and Survey of Automated Machine Learning Frameworks Marc-Andr´eZ¨oller [email protected] USU Software AG R¨uppurrer Str. 1, Karlsruhe, Germany Marco F. Huber [email protected] Institute of Industrial Manufacturing and Management IFF, University of Stuttgart, Allmandring 25, Stuttgart, Germany & Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA Nobelstr. 12, Stuttgart, Germany Abstract Machine learning (ML) has become a vital part in many aspects of our daily life. How- ever, building well performing machine learning applications requires highly specialized data scientists and domain experts. Automated machine learning (AutoML) aims to re- duce the demand for data scientists by enabling domain experts to build machine learning applications automatically without extensive knowledge of statistics and machine learning. This paper is a combination of a survey on current AutoML methods and a benchmark of popular AutoML frameworks on real data sets. Driven by the selected frameworks for eval- uation, we summarize and review important AutoML techniques and methods concerning every step in building an ML pipeline. The selected AutoML frameworks are evaluated on 137 data sets from established AutoML benchmark suits. 1. Introduction In recent years ML is becoming ever more important: automatic speech recognition, self- driving cars or predictive maintenance in Industry 4.0 are build upon ML. ML is nowadays able to beat human beings in tasks often described as too complex for computers, e.g., AlphaGO (Silver et al., 2017) was able to beat the human champion in GO.
    [Show full text]
  • Cover Page, Table of Contents and Others
    J. Software Engineering & Applications, 2010, 3 Published Online January 2010 in SciRes(www.SciRP.org/journal/jsea) CONTENTS Volume 3 Number 1 January 2010 Models for Improving Software System Size Estimates during Development W. W. AGRESTI, W. M. EVANCO & W. M. THOMAS………………………………………………1 A Massively Parallel Re-Configurable Mesh Computer Emulator: Design, Modeling and Realization M. YOUSSFI, O. BOUATTANE & M. O. BENSALAH………………………………………………11 Properties of Nash Equilibrium Retail Prices in Contract Model with a Supplier, Multiple Retailers and Price-Dependent Demand K. NAKADE, S. TSUBOUCHI & I. SEDIRI……………………………………………………………27 A Polar Coordinate System Based Grid Algorithm for Star Identification H. ZHANG, H. S. SANG & X. B. SHEN………………………………………………………………34 Evaluation of Feature Subset Selection, Feature Weighting, and Prototype Selection for Biomedical Applications S. LITTLE, S. COLANTONIO, O. SALVETTI & P. PERNER…………………………………………39 Cryptanalysis of TEA Using Quantum-Inspired Genetic Algorithms W. HU……………………………………………………………………………………………………50 Application of Design Patterns in Process of Large-Scale Software Evolving W. WANG, H. ZHAO, H. LI, P. Li, D. YAO, Z. LIU, B. LI, S. YU, H. LIU & K. Z. YANG…………58 Element Retrieval Using Namespace Based on Keyword Search over XML Documents Y. WANG, Z. K. CHEN & X. D. HUANG………………………………………………………………65 Integrated Web Architecture Based on Web3D, Flex and SSH W. J. ZHANG……………………………………………………………………………………………73 Analysis and Comparison of Five Kinds of Typical Device-Level Embedded Operating Systems J. L. WANG, H. ZHAO, P. LI, H. LI & B. LI……………………………………………………………81 Makespan Algorithms and Heuristic for Internet-Based Collaborative Manufacturing Process Using Bottleneck Approach S. A. BAREDUAN & S. HASAN………………………………………………………………………91 Copyright © 2010 SciRes JSEA Journal of Software Engineering and Applications (JSEA) Journal Information SUBSCRIPTIONS The Journal of Software Engineering and Applications (Online at Scientific Research Publishing, www.SciRP.org) is published monthly by Scientific Research Publishing, Inc., USA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Latex2ε Sources
    The LATEX 2" Sources Johannes Braams David Carlisle Alan Jeffrey Leslie Lamport Frank Mittelbach Chris Rowley Rainer Sch¨opf 1998/06/01 Contents a ltdirchk.dtx 1 1 LATEX System Dependent Initialisations 1 2 Initialisation 2 2.1 INITEX ................................. 2 2.2 Some bits of 2e ............................. 3 3 texsys.cfg 4 3.1 texsys.cfg ................................ 4 3.2 UNIX (web2c) ............................. 5 3.3 UNIX (other) .............................. 5 3.4 MSDOS (emtex) ............................ 6 3.5 MSDOS (other) ............................. 6 3.6 VMS (DECUS TEX, PD VMS 3.6) .................. 6 3.7 VMS (???) ................................ 6 3.8 MACINTOSH (OzTeX 1.6) ...................... 6 3.9 MACINTOSH (other) ......................... 7 3.10 FAKE EXAMPLE ........................... 7 4 Setting \@currdir 7 5 Setting \input@path 9 6 Filename Parsing 10 7 TEX Versions 11 8 ltxcheck.tex 12 i b ltplain.dtx 13 9 Plain TEX 13 c ltvers.dtx 24 10 Version Identifictation 24 d ltdefns.dtx 25 11 Definitions 25 11.1 Initex initialisations .......................... 25 11.2 Saved versions of TEX primitives ................... 25 11.3 Command definitions .......................... 26 11.4 Robust commands and protect .................... 33 11.5 Internal defining commands ...................... 36 11.6 Commands for Autoloading ...................... 37 e ltalloc.dtx 39 12 Counters 39 f ltcntrl.dtx 41 13 Program control structure 41 g lterror.dtx 45 14 Error handling 45 14.1 General commands ........................... 45 14.2 Specific errors .............................. 50 h ltpar.dtx 54 15 Paragraphs 54 15.1 Implementation ............................. 54 i ltspace.dtx 56 16 Spacing 56 16.1 User Commands ............................ 56 16.2 Chris' comments ............................ 56 16.3 Some immediate actions ........................ 58 16.4 The code ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Temp\Source2e.Dvi 03-23-0
    The LATEX2ε Sources Johannes Braams David Carlisle Alan Jeffrey Leslie Lamport Frank Mittelbach Chris Rowley Rainer Sch¨opf 1997/12/01 Patch level 1 Contents altdirchk.dtx 1 1LATEX System Dependent Initialisations 1 2 Initialisation 2 2.1INITEX................................. 3 2.2Somebitsof2e............................. 3 3 texsys.cfg 4 3.1texsys.cfg................................ 4 3.2UNIX(web2c)............................. 6 3.3UNIX(other).............................. 6 3.4MSDOS(emtex)............................ 6 3.5MSDOS(other)............................. 6 3.6 VMS (DECUS TEX,PDVMS3.6).................. 7 3.7 VMS (???) . .......................... 7 3.8MACINTOSH(OzTeX1.6)...................... 7 3.9MACINTOSH(other)......................... 7 3.10FAKEEXAMPLE........................... 7 4 Setting \@currdir 8 5 Setting \input@path 10 6 Filename Parsing 10 i 7TEXVersions 12 8 ltxcheck.tex 13 b ltplain.dtx 14 9 Plain TEX14 cltvers.dtx 26 10 Version Identifictation 26 d ltdefns.dtx 28 11 Definitions 28 11.1Initexinitialisations.......................... 28 11.2 Saved versions of TEXprimitives................... 28 11.3Commanddefinitions.......................... 29 11.4Robustcommandsandprotect.................... 37 11.5Internaldefiningcommands...................... 40 11.6CommandsforAutoloading...................... 41 e ltalloc.dtx 43 12 Counters 43 f ltcntrl.dtx 45 13 Program control structure 45 g lterror.dtx 49 14 Error handling 49 14.1Generalcommands........................... 49 14.2Specificerrors.............................
    [Show full text]