DOCSLIB.ORG

Annex 12 City of York Local Plan Preferred Sites Consultation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annex 12 City of York Local Plan Preferred Sites Consultation CITY OF YORK LOCAL PLAN Preferred Sites Consultation Statement September 2017 Local Plan Preferred Sites consultation statement (2017) C o n t e n t s 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Consultation Documents ............................................................................................................ 2 3.0 Who was invited to make representations ................................................................................ 3 4.0 How people were invited to make representations .................................................................. 4 5.0 Main issues raised ...................................................................................................................... 8 Potential Strategic Housing/Employment Allocations ............................................................... 9 Potential General Housing/Employment Allocations .............................................................. 59 Deleted Strategic Housing/Employment Allocations ............................................................... 80 Deleted General Housing/Employment Allocations ................................................................ 84 Former Safeguarded Land ........................................................................................................ 94 Alternative site submissions .................................................................................................... 99 6.0 Comments on the Plan’s wider themes ................................................................................. 182 7.0 Conclusion and next steps ..................................................................................................... 208 A n n e x e s Annex A Copy of ‘Preferred Sites’ consultation comments form Annex B: Copy of letters/email to consultees Local Plan Preferred Sites consultation statement (2017) 1 Local Plan Preferred Sites consultation statement (2017) 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Following approval at Executive on 30th June 2016, the Preferred Sites Consultation 2016 took place for a period of eight weeks from Monday 18th July 2016 to Monday 12th September 2016; the statutory 6 week period was extended to take account of the consultation taking place during the summer school holiday period. At this stage of plan preparation there is no regulatory framework with which to adhere, however the proposed consultation strategy is in accordance with the Council’s adopted Statement of Community Involvement (2007). 1.2 The purpose of this report is to summarise this Preferred Sites consultation; it outlines the consultation documents that were produced, sets out who was consulted, outlines the methods and techniques used during the consultation and summarises the main issues raised in the responses received. At the Plan’s examination stage we will need to demonstrate that we have considered ‘reasonable alternatives’; this process of iterative consultation will be critical in evidencing the Plan’s development. 1.3 Copies of all responses received can be found on our website. A formal regulation 22(1)(c) statement will be prepared at such time as the local plan is submitted to the Secretary of State for examination. This statement relates only to responses received through the formal consultation period. 1 Local Plan Preferred Sites consultation statement (2017) 2.0 Consultation Documents 2.1 A number of documents were produced as part of the consultation to inform people of the process, how they could respond, and ways in which they could contact the Planning and Environmental Management team. 2.2 The following main consultation documents were produced: Local Plan – Preferred Sites (2016) including zone based maps and individual site plans; Strategic Housing Market Assessment & Addendum (2016) Employment Land Review (2016) Windfall Analysis Technical Paper (2016) Sustainability Appraisal Local Development Scheme (2016) 2.3 A comments form was available (see Annex A) and a series of large scale maps illustrating the further sites on an area by area basis were also prepared to help people interpret how the further sites relate to their communities. All relevant supporting documents and evidence base documents associated with the local plan were already published and available on the council’s website, with a direct link provided from the main further sites consultation webpage. 2 Local Plan Preferred Sites consultation statement (2017) 3.0 Who was invited to make representations 3.1 To support the production of York’s Local Development Framework (now Local Plan), the Council have compiled a database to include statutory/specific consultation bodies and stakeholders, alongside individuals and groups who have registered an interest in the York development plan process, or have expressed an interest in being kept informed of the Plan’s progression towards adoption. 3.2 All Members received a briefing note setting out the proposed consultation strategy, and a copy of the main documents was placed in the Member’s group rooms at West Offices. Consultation with neighbouring authorities, as part of the duty to cooperate, consisted of a series of 1-1 meetings and utilised existing structures through Local Government North Yorkshire and York and the Leeds City Region. Internal consultation was also undertaken with relevant officers. 3.2 Specific Consultees include Natural England, Historic England, the Environment Agency and Highways England, neighbouring authorities and parish councils. This group of consultees were sent an email/letter informing them of the opportunity to comment and details of the web page and where to find more information. Meetings with these groups were also arranged during the consultation period. 3.3 All other consultees on our database (around 10,000), which includes anyone who commented on any previous stages of the local plan or has otherwise registered an interest in planning in York, were sent an email/letter informing them of the opportunity to comment and details of the web page and where to find more information. A copy of the letter sent to consultees can be found at Annex B. In addition, the Council sought to further publicise the Preferred Sites consultation and give details on how and when comments could be made. This is discussed in Section 4 below. 3 Local Plan Preferred Sites consultation statement (2017) 4.0 How people were invited to make representations 4.1 The Local Plan Preferred Sites consultation was undertaken in accordance with the Council’s adopted Statement of Community Involvement (2007).The consultation strategy was produced alongside colleagues in the Council’s Communications Team and Neighbourhood Management Team. The consultation included: a press release to advertise consultation and how to respond was issued 15th July, along with key media interviews including Radio York, Minster FM and York Press; all documents and response forms were made available online at www.york.gov.uk/localplan and on the main City of York website consultation finder; hard copies of all the consultation documents, exhibition boards and response forms were placed in West Offices Reception; it was also possible for those who required hard copies to ring or email the forward planning team and request a copy of the documents; hard copies of all the consultation documents and response forms were placed in Council libraries for the duration of the consultation; city wide distribution via Our Local Link of an ‘Our City Special’ with area based maps and free post response form delivered to every household; email or letter to all contacts registered on Local Plan database, including members of the public, statutory consultees, specific bodies including parish councils and planning agents, developers and landowners; staffed drop-in sessions/public exhibitions at venues across the City (see below); exhibition boards and consultation documents including response forms available at ward committee meetings; meetings with statutory consultees1 and neighbouring authorities; presentation and question and answer session with York branch of the Yorkshire Local Council Association (attended by Parish Councils), York Property Forum/Chamber of Commerce and the Environment Forum; and targeted social media campaign via Facebook and Twitter running for the duration of the consultation. 4.2 There were several ways in which people and organisations could comment on the Preferred Sites consultation. These were by: filling in the comments form (available on the Council’s website, on the back page of the city wide leaflet and at the libraries/west offices/exhibitions); writing to the Local Plan team, via a freepost address; emailing the Local Plan team; or using the Council’s online ‘Current Consultations’ tool (Survey Monkey) and completing an online response form with questions, via the Council’s website. 1 Statutory consultees are Historic England (HE), Environment Agency (EA), Natural England (NE) and Highways England (HEng). 4 Local Plan Preferred Sites consultation statement (2017) 4.3 A series of targeted meetings and exhibitions were arranged to publicise the consultation and engage with interested parties. Six exhibitions were planned at locations across the city, to coincide with the Zones set out in the PSC document. The exhibitions were staffed by officers and provided the opportunity for members of the public to find out about the consultation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • U DDPA Papers of the Palmes Family of Naburn 13Th Cent
    Hull History Centre: Papers of the Palmes Family of Naburn U DDPA Papers of the Palmes Family of Naburn 13th cent. - 1906 Biographical Background: The Palmes family traced its pedigree back to Manfred Palmes who was living in 1140 and had lands in Taunton, Somerset. It is a family unique in being able to trace an unbroken inheritance from son to son from the twelfth century to 1974, with only one exception in the eighteenth century. In 1226 lands at Naburn in East Yorkshire were assigned to William Palmes by Richard de Watervill, the brother of Maud de Watervill, William Palmes's wife. The demesne lordship of Naburn then descended in the Palmes family to the twentieth century (Baines, Old Naburn, p. 45; Allison, History of York East Riding, iii, p. 77; Foster, Pedigrees, iii). Naburn is about three miles south of York and the Palmes family built a manor house on the east bank of the River Ouse. The house was first mentioned in 1345 and had eight hearths in 1672. A drawing of circa 1720 indicates a two storey house, three bays in length with attic windows in high gables. In other words, the family was comfortably-wealthy, although it was not until the early sixteenth century that any of the male members of the family held public office. William Palmes, who was living in the middle of the fifteenth century, married Ellen Rocliffe, whose father was one of the barons of the exchequer. She provided him with three male heirs and a daughter before taking the veil during his lifetime, in 1479.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Release ------For Immediate Release ------North Yorkshire Mps Support the Call for the Introduction of a Pharmacy Minor Ailments Scheme
    Media Release -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Immediate Release -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ North Yorkshire MPs Support the Call For the Introduction Of A Pharmacy Minor Ailments Scheme. During December 2014 and January 2015 Julian Sturdy (MP for Outer York), Hugh Bayley (MP for York Central), Robert Goodwill (MP for Scarborough and Whitby), Andrew Jones (MP for Harrogate and Knaresborough), Julian Smith (MP for Skipton and Ripon) and Nigel Adams (MP for Selby and Ainsty) all visited Pharmacies within their respective constituencies. The purpose of each visit was to encourage people to use their local pharmacies to their fullest extent. This is because they are a convenient alternative to GPs and A&E when it comes to minor ailments such as, coughing, respiratory problems, colds and sore throats. After discussion regarding how a minor aliments scheme would work in practice, all participating MPs agreed that the introduction of such a scheme in North Yorkshire would only benefit those willing to take advantage of it. The MPs also support Community Pharmacy North Yorkshire’s decision to open discussion with the Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) in the North Yorkshire area to implement the scheme ASAP. Minor ailments are defined as, ‘common or self-limiting or uncomplicated conditions which can be diagnosed and managed without medical intervention’.1 Pharmacy based services to treat such ailments were introduced locally across the UK more than ten years ago2 to reduce the burden of minor ailments on higher cost settings such as general practice and the A&E departments of hospitals. Consultations for minor ailments are less expensive when provided 1 Self care: an ethical imperative.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Non-Emergency Transport Services
    Medical Non-Emergency Transport Services Public and stakeholder engagement to inform the service specification of medical non-emergency patient transport services for NHS Vale of York CCG and NHS Scarborough and Ryedale CCG April 2017 Engagement Feedback Report Version 1 Medical Non-emergency Transport Engagement Feedback Report Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 4 Recommendations for service specification and development ............................................................. 6 Waiting times ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Keeping people informed ................................................................................................................... 6 Consistency ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Eligibility Criteria - Clear and concise, easy to understand ................................................................. 6 Staff training ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Cancellations and changes .................................................................................................................. 6 Working with healthcare service providers .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • FDN-274688 Disclosure
    FDN-274688 Disclosure MP Total Adam Afriyie 5 Adam Holloway 4 Adrian Bailey 7 Alan Campbell 3 Alan Duncan 2 Alan Haselhurst 5 Alan Johnson 5 Alan Meale 2 Alan Whitehead 1 Alasdair McDonnell 1 Albert Owen 5 Alberto Costa 7 Alec Shelbrooke 3 Alex Chalk 6 Alex Cunningham 1 Alex Salmond 2 Alison McGovern 2 Alison Thewliss 1 Alistair Burt 6 Alistair Carmichael 1 Alok Sharma 4 Alun Cairns 3 Amanda Solloway 1 Amber Rudd 10 Andrea Jenkyns 9 Andrea Leadsom 3 Andrew Bingham 6 Andrew Bridgen 1 Andrew Griffiths 4 Andrew Gwynne 2 Andrew Jones 1 Andrew Mitchell 9 Andrew Murrison 4 Andrew Percy 4 Andrew Rosindell 4 Andrew Selous 10 Andrew Smith 5 Andrew Stephenson 4 Andrew Turner 3 Andrew Tyrie 8 Andy Burnham 1 Andy McDonald 2 Andy Slaughter 8 FDN-274688 Disclosure Angela Crawley 3 Angela Eagle 3 Angela Rayner 7 Angela Smith 3 Angela Watkinson 1 Angus MacNeil 1 Ann Clwyd 3 Ann Coffey 5 Anna Soubry 1 Anna Turley 6 Anne Main 4 Anne McLaughlin 3 Anne Milton 4 Anne-Marie Morris 1 Anne-Marie Trevelyan 3 Antoinette Sandbach 1 Barry Gardiner 9 Barry Sheerman 3 Ben Bradshaw 6 Ben Gummer 3 Ben Howlett 2 Ben Wallace 8 Bernard Jenkin 45 Bill Wiggin 4 Bob Blackman 3 Bob Stewart 4 Boris Johnson 5 Brandon Lewis 1 Brendan O'Hara 5 Bridget Phillipson 2 Byron Davies 1 Callum McCaig 6 Calum Kerr 3 Carol Monaghan 6 Caroline Ansell 4 Caroline Dinenage 4 Caroline Flint 2 Caroline Johnson 4 Caroline Lucas 7 Caroline Nokes 2 Caroline Spelman 3 Carolyn Harris 3 Cat Smith 4 Catherine McKinnell 1 FDN-274688 Disclosure Catherine West 7 Charles Walker 8 Charlie Elphicke 7 Charlotte
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Rapidly Changing Minority Ethnic Populations: a Case Study of York
    Mapping rapidly changing minority ethnic populations: a case study of York Gary Craig with Sue Adamson, Nazreen February 2010 Ali and Fasil Demsash Official statistics can be of limited help to those providing services to increasingly diverse populations. Using an innovative approach, this project drew on both formal and informal sources to estimate the size and diversity of York’s minority ethnic population and the implications for key agencies. The project was commissioned by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation’s York Grants Committee, which makes modest grants to organisations to help improve the general quality of life in York. The Committee wanted a more up-to-date picture of the city’s population than census data offers, to help inform its work. This report looks at: • the approach piloted by the project • what this approach found • the project team’s recommendations for policy and service organisations in York. The project suggests that York’s population is much more ethnically diverse than is often supposed, identifying 78 different first languages within the city. www.jrf.org.uk When they talk about communities, all they see are white, Asian, black and possibly Chinese. They don’t see the Italian community, they don’t see the Polish community and they don’t see the Iranian community. (Iranian community activist, Manchester, cited in Rutter et al., 2009) Contents List of tables and figures 4 Executive summary 5 1 Background 9 2 A brief history of minority ethnic 16 settlement in York 3 Methodology: how we approached this 21 research
    [Show full text]
  • Housing with JRHT a Guide for Residents HOUSING with JRHT LEAFLET 01
    LEAFLET 01 Housing with JRHT A guide for residents HOUSING WITH JRHT LEAFLET 01 This leaflet contains information and 1. The types and sizes of guidance on: homes we offer and where 1. The types and sizes of homes we offer and where they are located they are located 2. Our allocations policy What type of homes do we have? 3. What you will be expected to pay per property type We have flats, houses, and bungalows 4. Other organisations who provide suitable for: accommodation • Single people • Couples • Families with children • Older people – if you have retired we also have sheltered housing and ‘extra care’ housing What size of homes do we have? We have: • Studio apartments • One and two bedroom flats • Two, three, and some four and five bedroom houses • One, two and three bedroom bungalows • Two and three bedroom maisonettes PAGE 2 LEAFLET 01 HOUSING WITH JRHT Where are these homes? Rented Property Areas Streets Covered New Earswick Across the village Foxwood Woodlands Heron Avenue; Sherringham Drive; Teal Drive; Wenham Road; Sandmartin Court *Derwenthorpe Across the estate Holgate James Backhouse Place Huntington Albert Close; Carnock Close; Dickens Close; Disraeli Close; Geldof Road; Homestead Close; Nightingale Close; Stephenson Close; Theresa Close; Victoria Way Bootham Pembroke Street; Frederic Street Holgate Park Bonnington Court; Hillary Garth Clementhorpe Vine Street; Board Street Leeman Road area Bismarck Street South Bank area Trafalgar Street; Finsbury Street Other Inside City of York Council Acomb Road; Bridle Way; Birch Park;
    [Show full text]
  • Formal Minutes of the Committee Session 2019–21
    House of Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee Formal Minutes of the Committee Session 2019–21 Formal Minutes of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee, Session 2019–21 Formal Minutes WEDNESDAY 4 MARCH 2020 Members present: Neil Parish, in the Chair1 Geraint Davies Robbie Moore Dave Doogan Mrs Sheryll Murray Rosie Duffield Mr Toby Perkins Mary Glindon Julian Sturdy Dr Neil Hudson Derek Thomas 1. Declaration of interests Members declared their interests, in accordance with the Resolution of the House of 13 July 1992 (see Appendix). 2. Confidentiality and Privilege The Committee considered this matter. 3. Committee working practices Resolved, That the Committee examine witnesses in public, except where it otherwise orders. Resolved, That witnesses who submit written evidence to the Committee are authorised to publish it on their own account in accordance with Standing Order No. 135, subject always to the discretion of the Chair or where the Committee otherwise orders. Resolved, That the Committee shall not consider individual cases. Resolved, That the Committee delegated the following matters to the Chair: 1 Elected by the House (Standing Order No 122B) 29 January 2020 (Votes and Proceedings 29 January 2020). a) Agreeing the circulated agenda for Committee meetings; b) Engaging in correspondence on Committee matters which is not sufficiently significant to require approval by the Committee or is of a routine nature; c) Arranging informal meetings in Westminster on matters relating to the Committee’s remit; d) Authorising the issue of press notices about forthcoming evidence sessions, new inquiries and reports; e) Proposing reports to the Liaison Committee for debate in Westminster Hall; f) Taking decisions which are consequential on matters already decided by the Committee or which are urgent.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the House of Commons December 2019 Diane ABBOTT MP
    Members of the House of Commons December 2019 A Labour Conservative Diane ABBOTT MP Adam AFRIYIE MP Hackney North and Stoke Windsor Newington Labour Conservative Debbie ABRAHAMS MP Imran AHMAD-KHAN Oldham East and MP Saddleworth Wakefield Conservative Conservative Nigel ADAMS MP Nickie AIKEN MP Selby and Ainsty Cities of London and Westminster Conservative Conservative Bim AFOLAMI MP Peter ALDOUS MP Hitchin and Harpenden Waveney A Labour Labour Rushanara ALI MP Mike AMESBURY MP Bethnal Green and Bow Weaver Vale Labour Conservative Tahir ALI MP Sir David AMESS MP Birmingham, Hall Green Southend West Conservative Labour Lucy ALLAN MP Fleur ANDERSON MP Telford Putney Labour Conservative Dr Rosena ALLIN-KHAN Lee ANDERSON MP MP Ashfield Tooting Members of the House of Commons December 2019 A Conservative Conservative Stuart ANDERSON MP Edward ARGAR MP Wolverhampton South Charnwood West Conservative Labour Stuart ANDREW MP Jonathan ASHWORTH Pudsey MP Leicester South Conservative Conservative Caroline ANSELL MP Sarah ATHERTON MP Eastbourne Wrexham Labour Conservative Tonia ANTONIAZZI MP Victoria ATKINS MP Gower Louth and Horncastle B Conservative Conservative Gareth BACON MP Siobhan BAILLIE MP Orpington Stroud Conservative Conservative Richard BACON MP Duncan BAKER MP South Norfolk North Norfolk Conservative Conservative Kemi BADENOCH MP Steve BAKER MP Saffron Walden Wycombe Conservative Conservative Shaun BAILEY MP Harriett BALDWIN MP West Bromwich West West Worcestershire Members of the House of Commons December 2019 B Conservative Conservative
    [Show full text]
  • 10Th March 2015 APPG Launch Programme
    The All-party Parliamentary Group for 22q11 Syndrome Launch Parliamentary Reception 4-6pm on Tuesday 10th March 2015, House of Commons London SW1A 0AA Itinerary 4pm Arrival and tea 4.30-5pm: Presentations Jack Lopresti MP. Chair of the APPG. Conservative member for Filton and Bradley Stoke. Jane Ellison MP. Conservative member for Battersea and Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health). Dr Alex Habel. 5 mins. Retired Paediatrician, Great Ormond Street Hospital. Dorne & Lee Mitchell mother and father of Ivy. Julie Wootton. Chair of trustees Max Appeal 5-6pm Guests mingle 22q11 syndrome APPG March 2015 Purpose of the event To raise awareness of the diverse needs of children, teens and young adults with 22q11 DS – a complex condition that is often undiagnosed and leads to lifelong struggles for those affected. The syndrome is estimated to effect up to 35,000 people in the UK. These conditions affect health and quality of life from birth through infancy and childhood into adult life with over 180 physical, functional and psychological associations reported. The complexity of 22q11 frequently leads to clinical confusion and a delay in diagnosis often by years. The event is being hosted by Jack Lopresti, MP who recently set up an APPG to raise awareness of this medical condition after meeting one of his constituents who has a daughter with the condition. The other officers of the group are Nigel Adams MP, Paul Uppal MP and long-time supporter of Max Appeal, Margot James MP. Materials for the event Four posters highlighting some families who are members of the charity Max Appeal and showing the growth charts specific to 22q11DS.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the Consultation on the City of York Council’S Draft Local Plan
    Submission to the Consultation on the City of York Council’s Draft Local Plan Julian Sturdy MP 31st July 2013 Julian Sturdy MP Draft Local Plan Consultation Submission Part I – Greenbelt Policies Fundamental to the Council’s approach to the draft Local Plan has been the repeated argument that if York does not have an adopted Local Plan with a defined greenbelt in place by 2015, the greenbelt could be subjected to unrestrained development and that the Council are defining the greenbelt for the very first time. It will be argued in Part I of this submission that this is not the case. York does have an established greenbelt, which the Council are not seeking to define, but ‘re-define’. The government have also been clear that the York greenbelt policies of the now-revoked Regional Spatial Strategy will be retained until the greenbelt is defined within a Local Plan. While York’s greenbelt very clearly needs to be adopted in the form of a Local Plan, the need for urgency on this should not be used as an excuse or a mandate to radically alter what has for so many years been York’s greenbelt. The following points will reiterate this in greater detail: 1.1.1 Para 79 of the NPPF explicitly states “The Government attaches great importance to Green Belts. The fundamental aim of Green Belt policy is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open; the essential characteristics of Green Belts are their openness and their permanence.” Great weight is attached to the importance of greenbelts in protecting both our cities and our rural communities from urban and suburban sprawl.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 2.4. Yorkshire Parliamentary Enclosure Awards
    Changes in the status and distribution of mammals of the order Carnivora in Yorkshire from 1600. County history of the fox, badger, otter, pine marten, stoat, weasel, polecat, American mink, wildcat and domestic cat. Item Type Thesis Authors Howes, Colin Anthony Rights <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by- nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>. Download date 25/09/2021 18:49:21 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10454/4306 APPENDIX 2.4. YORKSHIRE PARLIAMENTARY ENCLOSURE AWARDS. APPENDIX 2.4. YORKSHIRE PARLIAMENTARY ENCLOSURE AWARDS (From English (1985) and Local Records Offices) (In alphabetical order of parish). Key: NR = North Riding, ER = East Riding, WR = West Riding, N = Nottinghamshire NY = North Yorkshire, SY = South Yorkshire, WY = West Yorkshire, H = Humberside, Cl = Cleveland, Cu = Cumbria , D = Durham, La = Lancashire, Li = Lincolnshire, Gm = Greater Manchester, Post Parish/Township Riding 1974 Act Award Acres County Abbotside, High NR NY 1814 1851 128 Abbotside, High & Low NR NY 1824 1837 938 Abbotside, High & Low NR NY 1880 1881 9701 Acklam ER NY 1769 1776 796 Acklam ER NY 1825 1854 310 Ackton WR WY 1812 1816 60 Ackworth WR WY 1772 1774 652 Acomb & Holgate WR NY 1774 1776 1581 Adingham WR WY 1865 1873 735 Adlingfleet WR H 1843 1847 1051
    [Show full text]