Minutes of the Kankakee River Basin and Yellow River Basin Development Commission Held Thursday, November 21, 2019 9:30 Am Cst/1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Minutes of the Kankakee River Basin and Yellow River Basin Development Commission Held Thursday, November 21, 2019 9:30 Am Cst/1 MINUTES OF THE KANKAKEE RIVER BASIN AND YELLOW RIVER BASIN DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION HELD THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2019 9:30 AM CST/10:30 AM EST Marshall County Building, Meeting Room 203 112 West Jefferson Street Plymouth, IN 46563 John McNamara, Chair, called the meeting to order at 10:30 a.m. EST, and the Pledge of Allegiance was recited. Mike Novotney, Secretary, called the roll. Members Present Bill Crase Craig Cultice John McNamara Mike Novotney James Walstra John Shure (IL) Andrew Wheeler (IL) Approved Proxies Present Tom Larson for Bill Emerson Guests Present Jim Carter Kathe Brunnick Cotton Ekhoff Joe Skelton Ben Eaton Jim Sweeney Bob Barr Siavash Beik Stephen Heim Clyde Avery Mark Kingma Debbie Palmer Kim Peterson Julie Morris Dan Gumz Ross St. Clair Christine Keil Tony Hendricks Steven Bohan Karen Horn Julie Fox Judy Stone Gus Ellicott Sarah Haefner State Rep. Pat Boy Staff Present Scott Pelath 1 Adoption of October 24 Meeting Minutes Mr. Cultice moved for the adoption of the minutes. Mr. Walstra seconded the motion. MOTION ADOPTED BY VOICE VOTE. Finance Report Mr. Pelath gave a financial report, which reflected the written report contained within his Executive Director’s Report [ATTACHMENTS 1 AND 2]. Mr. Pelath noted that the State Budget Agency has started releasing the Commission’s administrative appropriations, although the agency now does so quarterly instead of annually. He also reported that NIPSCO intends to reimburse the Commission for the Kouts and Dunn’s Bridge gages through 2022. The Commission had not yet received its $2.3 million appropriation, but funds would be expected for deposit soon. James Walstra requested that the Commission reimburse Jasper County $8,700 for the cost of a hydrology report pertaining to its FEMA project [ATTACHMENT 3]. Mr. Crase moved that the Commission pay Jasper County for the hydrology report from Jasper County’s remaining 2018 funds. Mr. Cultice seconded the motion. MOTION APPROVED BY VOICE VOTE. Mr. Novotney moved that the Commission accept the Finance Report. The chair heard a second. MOTION ADOPTED BY VOICE VOTE. The chair expressed his appreciation for Mr. Pelath’s work. Executive Director’s Report Mr. Pelath presented his Executive Director’s Report, which was distributed to members prior to the meeting [ATTACHMENT 1]. OLD BUSINESS Consideration of county problem tree and debris removal plans Mr. Pelath referred the Commission to problem tree and debris removal plans and costs submitted by various counties [ATTACHMENT 4]. 2 Mr. Pelath noted that in addition to the attached submissions, the Commission specifically committed at its previous meeting to funding a problem tree removal pilot project under the leadership of Porter County. Mr. Pelath recommended that the Commission approve at least some funding for the submissions. Given that there would be no December meeting, he suggested that counties could initiate and have a chance to complete some work before seasonal regulatory considerations take effect. The chair recognized Tony Hendricks to present LaPorte and Starke Counties’ submission. Mr. Hendricks said that they solicited bids for six sections on the Kankakee River, and three sections on the Yellow River. Mr. Hendricks turned the bids received for the work on those sections over to the Commission. The chair asked why the prices on the Yellow River were substantially higher. Mr. Hendricks answered that access is a greater challenge along the Yellow River. Mr. Crase asked that Section C of the Yellow River be placed on hold. He reported that he and Craig Cultice were developing a separate plan for that section. Mr. Crase advocated that at least some money be allocated to begin work without additional delays. Mr. Pelath asked Mr. Hendricks which sections would provide the most value for the price. Mr. Hendricks suggested that 10-Mile Road would be a first priority if DNR does not intend to allocate its own funds to problem tree mitigation. There was no confirmation of whether the Department would do so. Mr. Novotney asked whether the work can be completed for the bid amount. The chair stated that the low bidder on all sections, Allsop Excavating, is experienced in work on the river. James Walstra asked about the availability to either Silver Jacket or federal dollars. The chair emphasized the need to begin delivering results with newly available funds and complete work that was never before possible. Andrew Wheeler stated that he believed that there may be federal funding opportunities in the future. Mr. Pelath expressed his recommendation that the Commission authorize some funds for LaPorte and Starke Counties so they can initiate work. The Commission discussed figures of $350,000 and $500,000. Based on an engineer’s estimate of probable construction cost, Mr. Novotney also suggested a figure of $125,000 for the problem tree removal pilot project in Porter County. Mr. Pelath emphasize an expectation from the public and lawmakers of purposeful movement forward. 3 The chair stated his desire to fund the pilot project at the requested amount, do the entire Kankakee River, and get started on the Yellow River. He also stated that St. Joseph County would take care of its portion with local funds. The chair said the Commission needed to get something done finally. Mr. Crase wanted to ensure that because Allsop was the lowest bidder on all sections, that their bids stand for the remainder of the proposed removal project. Mr. Novotney moved for an allocation of $352,000 for LaPorte and Starke County tree removal with the section priorities left to the counties’ discretion. No second was heard. The chair moved for an allocation of $500,000 for LaPorte and Starke County tree removal with the section priorities left to the counties’ discretion. No second was heard. Mr. Pelath reminded the Commission that $117,000 in state dollars was also earmarked for the Kankakee Fish and Wildlife Area. Mr. Walstra moved for an allocation of $500,000 for LaPorte and Starke County tree removal with the section priorities left to the counties’ discretion. Mr. Crase seconded the motion. Mr. Crase emphasized that price and cost controls are in place for the contractor’s work. MOTION PASSED BY VOICE VOTE. Mr. Novotney moved that $125,000 be allocated to the pilot tree removal project between Porter and Jasper County to be administered by Porter County. Mr. Crase seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED BY VOICE VOTE. Craig Cultice presented plans for problem tree removal in Marshall County, and local drainage board funds are available to begin work on certain regulated sections. He also expressed his intention that Lee Wiltjer was going to demonstrate possible removal techniques. Mr. Crase reported that he and Mr. Cultice would ask to make an additional presentation in January 2020. For those reasons, Mr. Cultice requested no additional funds at this time. Mr. Walstra moved that Marshall County be permitted to move ahead with current plans on the Yellow River. Mr. Crase seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED BY VOICE VOTE. Thayer Farm update Mr. Pelath reported that DNR is close to closing on the adjacent Gus Ellicott property. He also conveyed his wish to have a Technical Advisory Committee meeting at the Thayer Farm in January. 4 Jasper County FEMA project update/hydrological report Mr. Walstra said the project still is waiting on Corps of Engineers approval. Verification of areas subject to assessments beginning in 2021 Mr. Pelath said IDNR is ahead of schedule in certifying the basin boundaries. He believed the work would be done well in advance of March. NEW BUSINESS Approval of RFQ and timeline for first phase of Yellow River design Mr. Pelath presented a draft Request for Qualifications and a timeline for submission of Statements of Qualification and project proposals [ATTACHMENT 5]. Mr. Crase asked about the process for scoring Statements of Qualification. Mr. Pelath answered with his intention that the process be adopted in January. Mr. Pelath asked for permission to issue the RFQ. Mr. Crase moved that the Executive Director issue the RFQ. Mr. Cultice seconded the motion. MOTION ADOPTED BY VOICE VOTE. Maintenance of Yellow River sediment trap at Range Road in Starke County Mr. Crase presented two bids to maintain Sediment Trap #24 at Range Road in Starke County on the Yellow River. He requested five quotes and received two. William Beaver Excavating was the low bid for $38,700. Mr. Crase moved to allocate $38,700 to clean Sediment Trap #24. Tom Larson seconded the motion. MOTION ADOPTED BY VOICE VOTE. Approval of river gage contract Mr. Pelath presented a new three-year agreement with the U.S. Geological Survey to renew the Commission’s current river gages [ATTACHMENT 6]. He asked for approval of the document. The new agreement places all of the gages on the same payment schedule, extends the contract length from two years to three years, and adds bedload sampling capability. 5 Mr. Crase moved that the Commission approve the USGS agreement. Mr. Walstra seconded the motion. MOTION ADOPTED BY VOICE VOTE. OTHER BUSINESS None. PUBLIC COMMENT Kathe Brunnick thanked Mr. Pelath for attending the recent Kankakee County Board meeting. Bob Barr expressed concerns about the effects of removing sediment from Sediment Trap #24. He cited the hydrological dynamics along the Yellow River and its possible implications for the completed pilot project. NEXT MEETING The next meeting was scheduled for January 16, 2020, at 9:30 a.m. CDT/10:30 a.m. EDT at a location to be determined in LaPorte County. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 11:59 a.m. EST. 6 ATTACHMENT 1 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S REPORT To: KRB-YRBDC Members From: Scott D. Pelath, Executive Director Date: November 18, 2019 On October 25, the State Budget Committee authorized the release of our $2.3 million state appropriation.
Recommended publications
  • Kankakee Watershed
    Van Kankakee 8 Digit Watershed (07120001) Buren Total Acres: 1,937,043 Kankakee Watershed - 12 Digit HUCs Illinois Acres: 561,041 Indiana Acres: 1,371,490 Michigan Acres: 4,512 LAKE MICHIGAN Indiana Counties Acres s n i a Elkhart County: 7,287 o g Kane i n Fulton County: 1 i l h Berrien l c Cass Jasper County: 103,436 I i Kosciusko County: 32,683 M Lake County: D15u1P,6a3g8e LaPorte County: 298,166 Marshall County: 207,453 Newton County: 79,365 Porter County: 141,795 Pulaski County: 8,658 St. Joseph County: 175,401 Indiana 0201 Starke County: 165,607 Cook LaPorte 0202 Grey shaded 12-digit watersheds fall completely or 0207 0 2 0203 partially within Indiana. Shaded 12-digit watershed 0 St. 0403 4 0205 names and acres are on page 2. Joseph Elkhart 0208 0 0206 4-digit labels represent the last 4 numbers of the 4 0209 0406 02 12-digit watershed code. 0 0104 0 4 3 *Please note, all acres are approximate.* 1003 01 0 0302 0 0105 5 Winter 2013 1 0 10 0 0 4 6 0301 02 1 4 0 0 0 0 4 0304 0 8 7 0102 Porter 0 1 0405 1 0 Will 1004 0 1 0303 8 0 1807 0 3 0101 Lake 4 8 0702 1308 0 0309 4 1007 8 0803 8 0 0 1 0 18 0703 11 1702 0 0 3 0307 1 0 0312 3 1 1 3 0 0 0701 2 1 0 1809 0 5 1306 1302 9 0308 1 0 2 5 0 5 4 1309 6 0704 0306 1 1 8 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0310 y 0502 8 0 1703 7 3 0 0 5 0705 0504 1010 0 d 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 8 n 3 1 0506 1 1 0 u 1 3 0 0603 0505 r 0 1 4 1305 8 1806 1502 8 1 30 0 G 1 6 0503 Marshall 1 0 1311 4 1 Kosciusko 1 0904 0501 1504 1 3 0604 0602 4 1 1604 3 0807 0 3 2 1307 1 4 1 0 0 Starke 8 2 8 0 3 9 0 4 1 0 1204 1101 0 9 1805 9 0601 1602 0 1803 1205
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Snowmobile Trails
    Connects To Wisconsin Trails East g g Dubuque g Warren L E G E N D 26 Richmond 173 78 Durand E State Grant Assisted Snowmobile Trails N Harvard O Galena O on private lands, open to the public. For B ILLINOIS’ SELF-FUNDED 75 E K detailed information on these trails, contact: A 173 L n 20 Capron n Illinois Association of Snowmobile Clubs, Inc. n P.O. Box 265 • Marseilles, IL 61341-0265 N O O P G e A McHenry Gurnee S c er B (815) 795-2021 • Fax (815) 795-6507 TRAIL SYSTEM Stockton N at iv E E onica R N H N Y e-mail: [email protected] P I R i i E W Woodstock N i T E S H website: www.ilsnowmobile.com C Freeport 20 M S S The State of Illinois has adopted, by legislative E Rockford Illinois Department of Natural Resources I 84 l V l A l D r Snowmobile Trails open to the public. e Belvidere JO v action, a system of funding whereby snowmobilers i R 90 k i i c Algonquin i themselves pay for the network of trails that criss-cross Ro 72 the northern 1/3 of the state. Monies are generated by Savanna Forreston Genoa 72 Illinois Department of Natural Resources 72 Snowmobile Trail Sites. See other side for detailed L L information on these trails. An advance call to the site 64 O Monroe snowmobile registration fees. These funds are administered by R 26 R E A L is recommended for trail conditions and suitability for C G O Center Elgin b b the Department of Natural Resources in cooperation with the snowmobile use.
    [Show full text]
  • Report from the Secretary of War, in Compliance with a Resolution of the Senate, Relative to an Examination with a View of Conne
    University of Oklahoma College of Law University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 5-12-1832 Report from the Secretary of War, in compliance with a resolution of the Senate, relative to an examination with a view of connecting Lake Michigan with the Wabash River in Indiana. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/indianserialset Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation S. Doc. No. 143, 22nd Cong., 1st Sess. (1832) This Senate Document is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 by an authorized administrator of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 22d CONGRESS, 143] 1st Session. i REPORT FROM THE SECRETARY OF WAR, IN COMPLJA.NCE IYith a resolution nf the Senate, relative to an examination with a view of connecting Lake Michigan with the Wabash river, in Indiana. • MAY 14, 1832. R ead, and ordered to be printed, • DEPARTMENT OF WAR, May 12, 183.2. rn: In compliance wi.th a resolution of the Senate, of the 23d ultimo, I have the honor to transmit the report of" the examinations made by How­ ard Stansbury, esq ., United States' Civil Engineer, relative to the con­ nection of Lake Michigan with the Wabash river, in the State of Indiana." I have the honor to be, Very respectfully, Your obedient servant, LEW.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources and Use in Lake County
    ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ " ¸ S # Whiting # ¸ ¸ # # " ¸ S S" # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # # ¸ # East ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ # ¸ Chicago # ¸ ¸ # S" # Ogden Burns Harbor ¸ # Dunes ¸ # ¸ # S" ¸ # ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ S" # ¸ # Porter Chesterton ¸ I-90 # S" ¸ ¸ # ¸ # # ¸ ¨¦§ I-94 S" # Gary ¨¦§ Hammond S" Lake S" Station Portage 80 ¸ # New I- ¸ S" Munster # S" I-80 § ¸ ¸ ¨¦ ¸ # # # ¸ ¨¦§ Chicago # " ¸ S ¸ # # Highland ¸ # ¸ S" S" # South ¸ # Haven ¸ # ¸ # Hobart ¸ " # Griffith S ¸ # S" ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ ¸ ¸ # # " # S ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # # # ¸ Dyer # ¸ ¸ # S" Merrillville # ¸ Schererville # " S" Valparaiso S S" Saint John S" r e e ¸ t # ¸ k # r ¸ # a o ¸ Crown # L P ¸ # Point ¸ S" # ¸ # ¸ # ¨¦§ I - ¸ 6 # Cedar 5 Lake ¸ # ¸ Cedar S" # ¸ Lake # ¸ Hebron Kouts # S" S" ¸ Lowell # ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ S" # ¸ # ¸ ¸ ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # # # ¸ Por # t ¸ ¸ e # # r ¸ ¸ # ¸ # Jas # ¸ p # ¸ e # r ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ # ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # # ¸ # ¸ ¸ # ¸ # # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # # ¸ # ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ # ¸ ¸ # ¸ ¸ ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ # # # ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ ¸ # ¸ # ke # ¸ # a ¸ ¸ ¸ L # # # ¸ # ¸ r # e sp ¸ a # J ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ # ¸ DeMotte # Wheatfield ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ " # n S r ¸ # S" e o ¸ ¸ # # ¸ t # p s w ¸ ¸ # # a e ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # # J N r ¸ Rive # ¸ Kankakee # ¨¦§I ¸ # - Lake 6 5 ewton N ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # Withdrawal
    [Show full text]
  • (11Gr100), a Historic Native American Short Duration Occupation on the Des Plaines River, Grundy County, Illinois
    The Highlands Site Craig and Vorreyer, 2004 Mundane Place or Sacred Space: Interpreting the Highlands Site (11Gr100), a Historic Native American Short Duration Occupation on the Des Plaines River, Grundy County, Illinois By Joseph Craig and Susan Vorreyer (Environmental Compliance Consultants, Inc.) Archaeological excavations conducted at the Highlands Site near Channahon, Illinois exposed a small, short-duration historic period Native American occupation situated on the upland bluff overlooking the Des Plaines River. Excavated features included four shallow basins, one hearth and a unique semi-circular shallow depression. Historic period artifacts were sparse and included glass seed beads, pieces of scrap copper and lead, and triangular projectile points. Rich amounts of subsistence remains including elk and bison were also recovered from several features. The Highlands site is interpreted as representing a Potawatomi occupation dating to the late 18 th or early 19 th century. Using historical accounts and illustrations of Potawatomi sites and religious customs and activities, the Highlands Site appears to represent a Potawatomi ritual location. Although graves or human skeletal material were not encountered, the analyses of the artifact assemblage, feature morphology and patterning, and interpretation of the faunal assemblage suggests the Highlands site was utilized as a mortuary location. The area surrounding the base of Lake Michigan at the point where the Kankakee and Des Plaines rivers merge with the upper reaches of the Illinois River was the penetration point of the Potawatomi migration into the western Great Lakes region known as the Illinois Country. Beginning in the mid-1600s, the Potawatomi, who inhabited the western Michigan, initiated a series of westward movements to acquire larger hunting territories buttressing their participation in the North American fur trade and also to avoid pressure (and competition) from Iroquois raiders and trappers.
    [Show full text]
  • Chief Shabbona History
    CHIEF SHABBONA HISTORY It was in 1775, one year before the American Revolution Shab-eh-nay was interested in the welfare of both Indians and settlers. The newcomers that an Indian boy was born near the banks of the taught him how to grow better crops and Shab-eh-nay shared his knowledge of nature – Kankakee River. A boy who would grow up to befriend the especially the medicinal powers of plants. new nation’s people. His Ottawa parents named him In 1827, the Winnebago planned an attack on the frontier village of Chicago; Shab-eh-nay “Shab-eh-nay” (Shabbona), which means “Built like a rode to Fort Chicago to warn the white men. In 1832, he made a heroic ride when Bear”. And true to his name, he grew up to be a muscular Blackhawk planned a raid to reclaim Indian land. The 54 year old Potawatomi Chief rode 200 lbs., standing 5’ 9” tall. 48 hours to warn settlers through unmapped forest and vast prairies to prevent Around 1800, Shab-eh-nay was part of an Ottawa hunting bloodshed of both settlers and Indians. party that wandered into a Potawatomi camp near the In gratitude for his peacemaking efforts, the United States, in Article III of the 1829 Treaty southern shore of Lake Michigan. All of the Ottawa of Prairie du Chien, reserved 1,280 acres of land for Chief Shab-eh-nay and his Band. returned to their own village, except Shab-eh-nay, who These lands were historically occupied by the Potawatomi in what is now DeKalb County, stayed through the winter.
    [Show full text]
  • The North Americanwaterfowl M Anagement P Lan the North
    PROJECT.HTML 219.980.5455 (h) room for room WWW.EARTH-SEA.COM/ 219.945.0543 (w) 13 219.924.4403—ext. (w) always or visit or Project Manager Project Chairman BOB NICKOVICH, BOB BLYTHE, DICK There is There For further information please contact: please information further For There is always room for more, and there is much left to do. We welcome your inquiries into participation as a partner. a as participation into inquiries your welcome We do. to left much is there and more, for room always is There courtesy of USDA NRCS. USDA of courtesy Several pictures in this publication this in pictures Several Lake Heritage Parks Foundation Parks Heritage Lake Lake County Parks Dept. Parks County Lake WYIN-TV Lake County Fish and Game and Fish County Lake Wille & Stiener Real Estate Real Stiener & Wille Kankakee River Basin Commission Basin River Kankakee Waterfowl USA Waterfowl J.F. New & Associates & New J.F. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Wildlife and Fish U.S. Indiana Heritage Trust Fund Trust Heritage Indiana Service Indiana Department of Natural Resources Natural of Department Indiana USDA Natural Resources Conservation Resources Natural USDA Inc. University of Notre Dame Notre of University Griffith Izaak Walton Conservation Lands, Conservation Walton Izaak Griffith Town of Demotte of Town GMC Dealers of NW Indiana NW of Dealers GMC The Nature Conservancy Nature The Enbridge Pipelines (Lakehead) LLC (Lakehead) Pipelines Enbridge Studer & Associates & Studer Dunes Calumet Audubon Society Audubon Calumet Dunes St. Joseph County Parks Department Parks County Joseph St. Ducks Unlimited, Inc. Unlimited, Ducks Ritschard Bros., Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Floods of October 1954 in the Chicago Area, Illinois and Indiana
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OP THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FLOODS OF OCTOBER 1954 IN THE CHICAGO AREA ILLINOIS AND INDIANA By Warren S. Daniels and Malcolm D. Hale Prepared in cooperation with the STATES OF ILLINOIS AND INDIANA Open-file report Washington, D. C., 1955 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FLOODS OF OCTOBER 1954 IN THE CHICAGO AREA ILLINOIS AND INDIANA By Warren S. Daniels and Malcolm D. Hale Prepared in cooperation with the STATES OF ILLINOIS AND INDIANA Open-file report Washington, D. C., 1955 PREFACE This preliminary report on the floods of October 1954 in the Chicago area of Illinois and Indiana was prepared by the Water Resources Division, C. G. Paulsen, chief, under the general direction of J. V. B. Wells, chief, Surface Water Branch. Basic records of discharge in the area covered by this report were collected in cooperation with the Illinois De­ partment of Public Works and Buildings, Division of Waterways; the Indiana Flood Control and Water Resources Commission; and the Indiana Department of Conservation, Division of Water Re­ sources. The records of discharge were collected and computed under the direction of J. H. Morgan, district engineer, Champaign, 111.; and D. M. Corbett, district engineer, Indi­ anapolis, Ind. The data were computed and te^t prepared by the authors in the district offices in Illinois and Indiana. The report was assembled by the staff of the Technical Stand­ ards Section in Washington, D. C., Tate Dalrymple, chief. li CONTENTS Page Introduction............................................. 1 General description of floods............................ 1 Location.............................................. 1 Little Calumet River basin...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Grand Kankakee Marsh Restoration Project
    Indiana Grand Kankakee Marsh Restoration Project www.igkmrp.org The Grand Kankakee Marsh was one of the premier wetland ecosystems in North America with nearly 1 million acres along the Kankakee River including emergent marsh, wet prairie, sedge meadow, shrub-scrub, and floodplain forest communities interspersed with black oak savanna and upland prairie. From its source near South Bend to the Illinois state line, the Kankakee River meandered some 250 miles through 2,000 bends, with an average fall of only 5 inches per mile. The marsh was legendary for the wide variety of plant and animal species that attracted sport and market hunters from around the world. Accounts from the late 1800’s describe barrels of frog legs, wagonloads of pelts, and railroad cars of game bound for the Chicago markets while European as well as American sportsmen relished the particularly abundant waterfowl and other wetland game birds. By the early 20th century efforts to drain the marsh for agriculture use had deepened and channelized the river and reduced its length in Indiana to less than 85 miles. For the most part the conversion of the landscape to intensive row crop production remains to the present time in spite of freQuent flooding. Attempts to bring back portions of the marsh in some of the wetter, more difficult to farm areas had little success before formation of the IGKMRP. The project launched in 1994 to pursue funding under the federal North American Wetland Conservation Act. The initial grant application for $1.5 million had 16 diverse partners that brought $2.4 million of matching funds for the goal of linking a network of 26,500 acres protected acres of wetlands for wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Indiana Fluvial Erosion Hazard Mitigation
    The Yellow River Initiative: A Conversation about the Kankakee River Basin Siavash Beik and Robert Barr 2017 ASFPM Annual Conference April 30 to May 5, 2017 Kansas City, Missouri Kankakee River in St Joseph County. -Walkerton Area Historical Society Burrows Camp near Dunn's Bridge. -Northwest Indiana Genealogical Society Collection Photo, Northwest Indiana Genealogical Society Collection Traditional Restoration Example, Kankakee River , Indiana, June 2015 - reach was “restored” in 2013 Traditional Maintenance Example, Bank “maintenance” on a tributary channel, Kankakee River, Indiana 2015 Wildland Hydrology, after Lane, 1955 Yellow River, East of Knox, IN Yellow River, West of Knox, IN System Assessment: Channel Morphologic Zones Yellow River Headwaters at St. Joseph County Line Yellow River near Armey Ditch, Marshall County Yellow River at Marshall – Starke County Line Yellow River, Starke County Yellow River, Starke County Yellow River West of Knox Detail from Quaternary Geologic Map of Indiana (Gray, 1989) Location of USGS Gages, Yellow River Watershed Data Analysis • Drainage modification • Soils & land management • Sediment gage data • Sediment source analysis • Channel geometry • Channel processes • Bank Failures Sediment Gage Data • Variability from year-to-year • Sharp increase in sediment between Oak Grove & Knox • Knox sediment load ≈ Brems sediment load Contributing Adjusted Annual Suspended Sediment Load Drainage Location (tons) Area (sq. mi.) 2013 2014 2015 2016 Average Annual Oak 377 20,340 12,682 15,012 29,372 19,351 Grove
    [Show full text]
  • Newton County Indian Trails and Pioneer Roads in This Issue
    Volume 22, Issue One A publication of the Newton County Historical Society, Inc. Winter 2016 $3.00 Newton County: Indiana’s Youngest County Newton County Indian Trails and Pioneer Roads In this issue .... by Beth Bassett The wilderness in the early days was marked by many Indian trails, caused by different parties of Indians travelling frequently over the same routes to hunt or trade. Their path usually Indian Trails and Pioneer Roads followed that of least resistance, avoiding swamps, bogs and stony places; choosing light and dry ground. Sometimes they would follow the traces made by buffalo and deer, going to salt The First To Arrive: Early Settlers licks and watering places. In peace times, hunting parties would follow those trails that afforded 1816, A Year Without Summer them the opportunity to camp and rest in the groves and woodlands. To the settlers, these paths were not always plainly marked. In places they would be lost in the expanse of the plains, or Newton County, Another Place disappeared into the marshes and lowlands. Another Time: Millinnea-1840 The general outlines of the larger trails were fairly well fixed. There might be two or three paths • The Northwest Territory in some places, but these may later converge and run together. And in others, the path could • The Land of the Potawatomi totally disappear, only to appear later down the path. • Potawatomi Facts In the pioneer era, they provided the most direct path to the early town of Morocco; to the settlers along the Iroquois and the first Jasper County Courthouse; thence onward east to • The Secession of Lands Rensselaer.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Kankakee River System in Kankakee County, Illinois
    s »f OS: CO- GEOLOGY OF THE KANKAKEE RIVER SYSTEM IN KANKAKEE COUNTY, ILLINOIS David L Gross and Richard C. Berg Illinois Institute of Natural Resources STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY NOTES 92 Jack A. Simon, Chief January 1981 COVER PHOTO: Vertical aerial photograph of the Kankakee River at the Illinois- Indiana state line. Gross, David L. Geology of the Kankakee River system in Kankakee County, Illinois / by David L. Gross and Richard C. Berg.— Champaign, 111. : Illinois State Geological Survey, January 1981. 80 p. : ill. : 28 cm. — (Environmental geology note ; 92) References : p. 75. 1. Geology— Illinois— Kankakee County 2. Geology— Illinois— Kankakee River. I. Berg, Richard C. II. Series. Printed by authority of the State of Illinois/1981/2000. GEOLOGY OF THE KANKAKEE RIVER SYSTEM IN KANKAKEE COUNTY, ILLINOIS David L Gross and Richard C. Berg ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Natural Resources Building 615 East Peabody Drive ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY NOTES 92 Champaign, IL 61820 January 1981 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://archive.org/details/geologyofkankake92gros CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 The river system 1 Goals of project 4 Previous studies 4 Methods 6 GENERAL GEOLOGY 18 Geologic History 18 Surficial geology along river 20 Bedrock topography and sand thickness along river 26 GEOLOGY OF SEDIMENT IN RIVER 39 Thickness and distribution 39 Chemical composition 55 Discussion of sedimentation 61 RIVER MORPHOLOGY 64 Air photo evidence, 1939-1954 65 Air photo evidence, 1954-1973 68 Topographic map evidence, 1922-1973 71 SUMMARY 72 Acknowledgments 73 REFERENCES 75 APPENDIX 77 m TABLES 1.
    [Show full text]