DOCSLIB.ORG

Nuclear Power

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nuclear Power AUSTRALIA,,/^ CommonweaJth of Australia AUSTRAL AN ATOMC ENERGY COMMISS ON EIGHTEENTH ANNUAL REPORT BEING THE COMMISSION'S REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 1970 AUSTRALIAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION The Minister of State for National Development The Honourable D. E. Fairbairn, D.F.C., MP. (To 13 November 1969) The Honourable R. W. C. Swartz, M.B.E., E.D., MP. (From 20 November 1969) Members of the Commission During the Year 1969-70 Chairman Sir Philip Baxter, K.B.E., C.M.G., B.Sc., Ph.D.(Birm.), F.A.A., F.R.A.C.I. Deputy Chairman R. G. Ward, MA, Ph.D.(Cantab.) Members K. F. Alder, M.Sc., F.I.M. R. W. Boswell, O.B.E., M.Sc. (To 21 October 1969) L. F. Bott, D.S.C., B.Com. (From 1 December 1969) M. C. Timbs, B.Ec., A.A.S.A., FAI.M. (Executive Member) Secretary W. B. Lynch, BA ADVISORY COMMITTEES Appointed under Section 20 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1953-66 Commonwealth of Australia Advisory Committee on Uranium Mining AUSTRALIAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION H. M. Murray, C.B.E., B.Sc., B.Met.E., M.Aus.I.M.M., Chairman. F. S, Anderson, C.B.E., B.Mech.E., M.I.M.M., M.Aus.I.M.M., M.I.E.Aust. Tulius Kruttschnitt, Ph.B.(Yale), M.I.M.M., M.Aus.I.M.M., M.Am.I.M.M.E. r Function: To advise the Commission on uranium mining and the treatm :it of uranium To the Honourable R. W. C. Swartz, M.B.E., E.D., M.P., ores. Minister of State for National Development, Parliament House, Safety Review Committee Canberra, A.C.T. Professor S. Sunderland, C.M.G., M.D., B.S., D.Sc., F.R.A.C.P., F.R.A.C.S., F.A.A., Chairman. Sir, Dr. C. J. Cummins, M.B., B.S., D.P.H. D. J. Stevens, O.B.E., B.Sc., A.IristP. In accordance with Section 31 of the Atomic Energy Act, Function: To review periodically the health 1953-66, we submit the Eighteenth Annual Report of the Australian and safety standards and procedures adopted by the Commission in the operation of its Atomic Energy Commission, covering the Commission's operations reactors and in the use of radiation, radioactive for the financial year ended 30 June 1970. substances, and toxic materials. Financial accounts for the year, with a report on the accounts Atomic Energy Advisory Committee by the Auditor-General as required by the Act, are appended to the report. A statement of the Commission's capital assets as at 30 June A. W. B. Coady, C.M.G., B.A., B.Ec. 1970 is also appended to the accounts. W. H. Connolly, C.B.E., B.E.E., B.Com., M.l.E.Aust. J. G. Phillips, C.B.E., B.Ec. Sir Lionel Hooke, S.M.I.R.Amer., F.I.R.E.Aust. Yours faithfully, Professor M. C. Kemp, B.Com., M.A., Ph.D. J. D. Norgard, B.E., F.S.A.S.M.(Met.), A.S.A.SJV1. J. P. BAXTER, Chairman. Professor J. W. Roderick, M.A,(Camb.), M.Sc., Ph.D.(Bristol), F.A.A., R. G. WARD, Deputy Chairman. M.I.StructE., M.I.C.E., A.F.R.Ae.S., M.I.E.Aust., M.A.S.C.E. K. F. ALDER, Member. R. A. Simpson, B.E., F.S.A.S.M., M.I.E.Aust. Professor R. Street, B.Sc., M.Sc., Ph.D.(Lond.) L. F. BOTT, Member. - L. W. Weickhardt, M.Sc., F.R.A.C.I., F.A.I.M. M. C. TIMES, Executive Member. Function: To advise the Commission on scientific, industrial and economic matters 45 Beach Street, Coogee, N.S.W. 2034 relating to atomic energy research and development. S September 1970. Contents Contents 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 9 8 RADIOISOTOFES 84 Nuclear Power 9 Production and Services 84 Raw Materials 10 Supply and Distribution Statistics 84 Research 10 Product Development 87 Radioisotope Production 11 Gamma-Ray and Electron Beam Irradiation Services 89 International 12 General 12 9 OPERATIONS AND SERVICES 90 Operations 90 13 Waste Disposal 92 2 JERVIS BAY POWER STATION Critical Facility 93 Services 93 3 NUCLEAR ENERGY DEVELOPMENTS 19 World Power Developments 19 10 INTERNATIONAL MATTERS 94 National Programs 19 International Atomic Energy Agency 94 Uranium Enrichment 20 Co-operation with India 97 Heavy Water 22 Co-operation with New Zealand 97 Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Explosions 23 Overseas Visits 97 Table of World Nuclear Power Stations 24 Distinguished Visitors 98 4 RUM JUNGLE ENTERPRISE 27 11 GENERAL 99 Ministerial Administration of Atomic Energy Act 99 Membership of Commission 99 5 RAW MATERIALS - 34 Overseas Liaison 99 Exploration for Uranium 34 Senior Staff Changes 99 Production of Uranium 48 Terms and Conditions of Employment 100 Overseas Developments 48 Staff Numbers 100 World Uranium Resources Survey 52 Acknowledgments 100 Health and Safety in Mining and Milling of Radioactive Ores 52 Atomic Energy Advisory Committee 101 Safety Review Committee 101 Information Services 101 6 RESEARCH RELATED TO NUCLEAR POWER 53 Extramural Research 103 Reactors 53 Overseas Attachments 103 Water Cooled Reactor Systems (Diagrams) 55 Australian Institute of Nuclear Science and Engineering 105 Critical Aspects of Performance 59 Australian School of Nuclear Technology 108 Reactor Fuel Studies 69 Finance 109 Reactor Materials 71 APPENDICES A — Financial Accounts 112 7 RADIATION AND RADIOISOTOPE RESEARCH AND OTHER B — Auditor-General's Report 114 RESEARCH ACTIVITIES 74 C — Senior Staff of Commission 115 Research Involving Ionising Radiation " 74 D — AAEC Research Projects 118 Radioisotope Applications Research 80 E — AAEC Research Contracts 120 Analytical Chemistry 82 F — AINSE Research and Training Projects 121 Computing Research 83 G — Technical Papers by Commission Staff 124 6 7 1 NTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY NUCLEAR POWER As a result of the Cummonwealth-State discussions held early in 1969 (described in the last Annual Report), a study was inaugurated of the feasibility of establishing a 500 megawatt nuclear power station at Jervis Bay, on the New South Wales coast. The study was carried out by the Commission, in collaboration with the Electricity Commission of New South Wales. The Jervis Bay site, located in Commonwealth Territory, was found to be satisfactory from all points of view. Geological surveys established the presence of suitable foundation rock, and the study of winds and water movements showed that cooling water from the station could be discharged into the sea in such a w?y as to ensure rapid dispersion. Discussions between the Commonwealth and New South Wales have resulted in broad agreement on the guiding principles to be applied in the financing, con- struction and operation of the station. The Commonwealth will pay for the construction and own the station, and the electricity will be taken into the New South Wales State network. New South Wales will guarantee the electricity requirements of the Australian Capital Territory. Tender documents were issued on 28 February 1970 to nuclear engineering firms which had expressed interest. Tenders were invited, in the first instance, for the nuclear steam supply system, which might be based on any one of the commercially available reactor systems. The documents stipulated that the reactor system should be capable of using fuel based on indigenous Australian uranium supplies. Tenders were returnable on 15 June 1970 and 14 were received from seven organisations in Great Britain, Germany, the U.S.A. and Canada, embracing five reactor types. Thereupon the Australian Atomic Energy Commission, together with the Electricity Commission of New South Wales and the engineering con- sultant firm of Bechtel (Pacific) Corporation Ltd., began the assessment of the proposals on the basis that a contract could be awarded before the end of 1970, with full-power operation of the station by 31 December 1975. A Commonwealth Consultative Committee on Nuclear Energy, representative of the Commonwealth and States, held it first meeting in June, 1970. The Com- mittee will consider the many complex regulatory and administrative aspects of nuclear power stations and, from it, State instrumentalities will gain insight into problems of design, contracts, operation and licensing of nuclear plants. The world-wide trend towards nuclear power continued during the year, investigations of coolant circulation, heat removal and coolant chemistry and 19 new nuclear stations being ordered (15 in 1968), with a total capacity of about corrosion control; and studies of reactor materials, particularly in relation to cor- 18,000 megawatts (about 11,000 megawatts in 1968-69). At 13 June 1970, there rosion and mechanical behaviour and the effects of irradiation. The knowledge was a total of 67 stations already in operation with a capacity of 15,656 megawatts, and experience of the research staff gained from these studies were used to and a further 130 stations under construction or committed, with a total capacity considerable advantage during the drafting of the tender specification for the Jervis of 113,755 megawatts. Bay power reactor. The involvement of research staff in the Jervis Bay power Some thought will need to be given to supplies of enriched fuel in the future, project will continue during the assessment of tenders and at all stages of'detailed in the light of United States policy and the success of the joint British-Netherlands- design, construction and commissioning. West German partnership established to exploit the gas centrifuge process of Good progress has been made in developing methods of manufacturing reactor uranium enrichment, and other enrichment work which is proceeding. fuel. A pi nt for making uranium dioxide pellets of high purity and precise dimensions is working successfully on a scale which could be satisfactorily scaled up to production plant size when required.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Confronting the Experts
    Confronting the experts Brian Martin, editor Published in 1996 by State University of New York Press, Albany This is the August 1995 typescript with minor changes in the text, a different format and page numbering (112 instead of 210 pages) and omission of the index. Contents 1. Introduction: experts and establishments 1 Brian Martin 2. Sewerage treatment and the engineering establishment 8 Sharon Beder 3. Fluoridation: breaking the silence barrier 26 Mark Diesendorf 4. Terrorism: the struggle against closure 45 Edward S. Herman 5. “What price intellectual honesty?” asks a neurobiologist 58 Harold Hillman 6. The Guido Riccio controversy in art history 78 Michael Mallory and Gordon Moran 7. Confronting the nuclear power structure in India 93 Dhirendra Sharma 8. Conclusion: learning from struggle 105 Brian Martin Contributors 110 1 Introduction: experts and establishments Brian Martin Published in Brian Martin (editor), Confronting the Experts (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1996), pp. 1-12 Today’s complex society is increasingly The most prominent and regular pronuclear dependent on experts — civil engineers, contributor was Sir Ernest Titterton, Professor surgeons, taxation lawyers, computer of Nuclear Physics at the Australian National programmers, economists, and many others. University, whose involvement with and These experts are usually defined by their advocacy of nuclear technology dated from the credentials and their solidarity with main- 1940s. As a local, high-status authority, Sir stream professional bodies. Those who oppose Ernest could easily get his articles and letters them often do not have the same credibility, published. Other prominent pronuclear although they may have the same levels of contributors were Sir Philip Baxter, former knowledge and experience.
    [Show full text]
  • International Conference on Nuclear Criticality Safety
    OFFICIAL PROGRAMPREVIEW International Conference on Nuclear Criticality Safety International Cooperation Hosted by the Nuclear Criticality Safety Division of the American Nuclear Society Co-Sponsored by NEA Photo by Randy Montoya/SandiaPhoto Randy by Laboratories National September 13-17, 2015 Omni Charlotte Hotel Charlotte, NC 2015 International Conference on Nuclear Criticality Safety Our most sincere thanks to the following contributors for their support Gold Level Silver Level Bronze Level Other Table of Contents General Meeting Information Conference Officials 4 Schedule at a Glance 5 Daily Schedule 6-7 General Information 8 Plenary and Special Sessions Welcome Reception 9 Opening Plenary 9 Reception at the Mint Museum 9 ICNC Poster Session and Reception 10 Banquet Dinner at Founders Hall 10 ICNC Workshop 10 V.C. Summer Nuclear AP1000® Nuclear Plant 10 International Cooperation Construction Tour Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility Plant Tour 10 Technical Sessions Technical Sessions by Day: Monday 11-12 Technical Sessions by Day: Tuesday 13-16 Technical Sessions by Day: Wednesday 17-20 Technical Sessions by Day: Thursday 21-22 Additional Hotel Map 23 www.ans.org 2015 International Conference on Nuclear Criticality Safety: Official Program 3 Meeting Officials International Cooperation International Conference on Nuclear Criticality Safety Every 4 years the international nuclear criticality safety community gathers to discuss technical, operational, computational, and regulatory issues in the practice of nuclear criticality safety. ICNC 2015 (International Conference on Nuclear Criticality) allows specialists from around the globe to come together to discuss, analyze and study the latest developments in the area of nuclear criticality safety. This is a unique opportunity to exchange ideas with industry experts, leaders, colleagues and peers.
    [Show full text]
  • Onr Corporate Plan 2017/18 En Route to 2020
    ONR CORPORATE PLAN 2017/18 EN ROUTE TO 2020 Office for Nuclear Regulation Corporate Plan 2017/18 Financial year 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2018 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Paragraphs 23 and 25(3) of Schedule 7 to the Energy Act 2013 July 2017 © ONR copyright 2017 The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as ONR copyright and the document title specified. Where third party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries related to this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] This publication is available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications Print ISBN 9781474145695 Web ISBN 9781474145701 ID P002881793 06/17 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK for Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office CONTENTS 1. Foreword .........................................................................................................1 2. About this plan ..............................................................................................3 3. Our Operating Environment .........................................................................9 4. Our Strategic Themes and Key Activities ....................................................15 Influencing improvements
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Yearbook
    Golden Yearbook Golden Yearbook Stories from graduates of the 1930s to the 1960s Foreword from the Vice-Chancellor and Principal ���������������������������������������������������������5 Message from the Chancellor ��������������������������������7 — Timeline of significant events at the University of Sydney �������������������������������������8 — The 1930s The Great Depression ������������������������������������������ 13 Graduates of the 1930s ���������������������������������������� 14 — The 1940s Australia at war ��������������������������������������������������� 21 Graduates of the 1940s ����������������������������������������22 — The 1950s Populate or perish ���������������������������������������������� 47 Graduates of the 1950s ����������������������������������������48 — The 1960s Activism and protest ������������������������������������������155 Graduates of the 1960s ���������������������������������������156 — What will tomorrow bring? ��������������������������������� 247 The University of Sydney today ���������������������������248 — Index ����������������������������������������������������������������250 Glossary ����������������������������������������������������������� 252 Produced by Marketing and Communications, the University of Sydney, December 2016. Disclaimer: The content of this publication includes edited versions of original contributions by University of Sydney alumni and relevant associated content produced by the University. The views and opinions expressed are those of the alumni contributors and do
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Decommissioning Authority
    Nuclear Decommissioning Authority Infrastructure Development Working Group Meeting 8 May 2014 Natasha Hanson Head of People Relations Skills Challenges Growing Global Demand for Nuclear Skills An Ageing Workforce The NDA Estate Wide Resource Profile NDA Total Resource Gap - 2012 to 2026 18000 Shortage = -1395 17000 16000 15000 Excess = +930 14000 13000 Total Demand Attrition 2.5% pa 12000 11000 Full Time Equivalent Number 10000 9000 8000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Year 3 NDA Estate Wide & New Nuclear Build Requirements NDA Estate and New Build Requirements 28000 26000 24000 22000 20000 18000 16000 14000 NDA Estate 12000 New Build 10000 Total 8000 Full Time Equivalent Number 6000 4000 2000 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Year 4 NDA Estate Resource Issues • Acceleration of de-commissioning leading to early release of nuclear resources • Low staff attrition (average of 2% for staff) • Higher attrition of ASW staff – dependent on economic climate, opportunities within the catchment and scarcity of skill • Over next 15 years at least 34% of the workforce will reach pensionable age • Implied recruitment of 18% of existing population over the next 15 years • Approach (overall) is to continue with apprentice, and graduate training schemes and development of the current workforce 5 Skills Priorities High Priorities Other Priorities • Project / Programme Managers • Design Engineers / Technicians • Construction Project Managers • Quality Assurance • Steel
    [Show full text]
  • Magnox Electric Plc's Strategy for Decommissioning Its Nuclear
    A review by HM Nuclear Installations Inspectorate Magnox Electric plc’s strategy for decommissioning its nuclear licensed sites A review by HM Nuclear Installations Inspectorate Magnox Electric plc’s strategy for decommissioning its nuclear licensed sites Published by the Health and Safety Executive February 2002 Further copies are available from: Health and Safety Executive Nuclear Safety Directorate Information Centre Room 004 St Peter’s House Balliol Road, Bootle Merseyside L20 3LZ Tel: 0151 951 4103 Fax: 0151 951 4004 E-mail: [email protected] Available on the Internet from: http://www.open.gov.uk/hse/nsd ii FOREWORD This report sets out the findings of a review by the Health and Safety Executive’s Nuclear Installation Inspectorate, in consultation with the environment agencies, of the Magnox Electric plc (Magnox Electric) decommissioning and waste management strategies for its nuclear licensed sites. The review was undertaken in accordance with the 1995 White Paper “Review of Radioactive Waste Management Policy: Final Conclusions”, Cm 2919, which stated that the Government would ask all nuclear operators to draw up strategies for the decommissioning of their redundant plant and that the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) would review these strategies on a quinquennial basis in consultation with the environment agencies. The Magnox Electric strategy upon which this review is based was prepared subsequent to the merger of Magnox Electric with British Nuclear Fuels plc (BNFL) but whilst it still remained a separate nuclear site licensee under the Nuclear Installations Act 1965 (as amended). This report therefore considers Magnox Electric’s decommissioning and waste management strategies as of April 2000 for its nuclear licensed sites at: Berkeley, Bradwell, Dungeness A, Hinkley Point A, Hunterston A, Oldbury, Sizewell A, Trawsfynydd and Wylfa; and at the Berkeley Centre; and for the financial liabilities for waste and decommissioning on other nuclear licensed sites (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • UNSW D14 College Walk, Kensington Statement of Heritage Impact
    UNSW D14 College Walk, Kensington Statement of Heritage Impact UNSW owner and applicant Lendlease D&C partner Prepared for UNSW April 2019 • Issue E Project number 18 0724 Tanner Kibble Denton Architects Pty Ltd | ABN 77 001 209 392 | www.tkda.com.au Sydney Level 1, 19 Foster Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010 Australia | T+61 2 9281 4399 Brisbane Level 14, 241 Adelaide Street, Brisbane QLD 4000 Australia | T+61 7 3087 0160 Principals Alex Kibble, Robert Denton, Megan Jones, John Rose | Practice Directors George Phillips, Jocelyn Jackson, Melanie Mackenzie Senior Associates Ian Burgher, Angelo Casado, David Earp, Anna Harris, Emma Lee, Scott MacArthur, Renata Ratcliffe, Lachlan Rowe Associates Asta Chow, Paul Dyson, Sean Williams NSW Nominated Architects Robert Denton Registration No 5782 | Alex Kibble Registration No 6015 UNSW D14 • Statement of Heritage Impact TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background and purpose of the report 1 1.2 Response to Submissions 1 1.3 Methodology and terminology 1 1.4 Author identification 2 1.5 Site location and description 2 1.6 Documentation 3 1.7 Heritage management context 4 2 Historical Background 5 2.1 Kensington Racecourse 5 3 Heritage Significance 15 3.1 Statement of significance 15 4 Description of the Proposal 16 5 Assessment of Heritage Impact 18 5.1 Design Considerations 18 5.2 NSW Heritage Office Model Questions 22 5.3 Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012 26 5.4 Response to submission from Randwick City Council 28 6 Conclusions 30 APPENDIX A Photographs of existing site A-1 Document / Status
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Fuel Cycle Information System
    IAEA-TECDOC-1613 Nuclear Fuel Cycle Information System A Directory of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities 2009 Edition April 2009 IAEA-TECDOC-1613 Nuclear Fuel Cycle Information System A Directory of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities 2009 Edition April 2009 The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Materials Section International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramer Strasse 5 P.O. Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE INFORMATION SYSTEM: A DIRECTORY OF NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE FACILITIES 2009 EDITION IAEA, VIENNA, 2009 ISBN 978–92–0–102109–0 ISSN 1011–4289 © IAEA, 2009 Printed by the IAEA in Austria April 2009 FOREWORD In recent years, there have been rising expectations for nuclear power all over the world to meet the ever increasing demand for electricity. Several countries with nuclear power have declared intentions to build new nuclear power plants to replace their existing capacities or to add new capacities. Several other countries without nuclear power are taking an active interest in launching nuclear power programmes. Nuclear power and nuclear fuel cycle go hand in hand. Hence implementations of such nuclear power programmes cannot be considered without parallel development in the nuclear fuel cycle area. The worldwide nuclear fuel cycle industry comprises several global players which are operating on a commercial basis in more than one country and many other domestic players which are active only in their respective countries. Knowing the current status and the future outlook of the nuclear fuel cycle industry is important not only for meeting the needs of global nuclear power development but also for facilitating the multilateral approach to the nuclear fuel cycle currently being discussed with a focus on ‘assurance of fuel supply’ and ‘non-proliferation of nuclear materials’.
    [Show full text]
  • The University Archives 2018
    THE UNIVERSITY ARCHIVES 2018 Cover image: Menu for the Censorship Reunion Dinner, 16 August 1919 from the papers of JT Wilson, Professor of Anatomy (1890-1920). Wilson was commissioned in 1898 in the New South Wales Scottish Rifles, 5th Infantry Regiment. In 1908-13 he was appointed State Commandant of the new Australian Intelligence Corps. On the outbreak of war, Wilson was called up with the rank of Lieutenant-Colonel to organize and command the Censor’s Office, 2nd Military District (New South Wales). Forest Stewardship Council (FSC®) is a globally recognised certification overseeing all fibre sourcing standards. This provides guarantees for the consumer that products are made of woodchips from well-managed forests, other controlled sources and reclaimed material with strict environmental, economical social standards. Record The University Archives 2018 edition Fire at the Grandstand No. 1 Oval, 27 May 1975 [G74/19] Contact us [email protected] 2684 2 9351 +61 Contents Archivist’s notes ............................2 The First Greek Play in the Colony: Agamemnon at the University of Sydney ........................3 Marjorie Holroyde and The New South Wales Board of Architects Travelling Scholarship and Australian Medallion 1927 ................9 That “Great” War Never Ended: The Battle Over The War Memorial Carillon at The University of Sydney in the 1920s ........................ 11 Beyond 1914 – The University of Sydney and the Great War ........17 Richard Francis Bailey, Pharmacist .................................. 22 Archive news ............................... 24 Selected accession list .................31 General information ....................33 Archivist’s notes My grandfather, a writer and journalist, used to say, Going back a decade further, 1918 marked the cessation “start with an earthquake and build up to the climax”.
    [Show full text]
  • Signature Research on Legacy Management at the National Nuclear Laboratory, United Kingdom - 10362
    Signature Research on Legacy Management at the National Nuclear Laboratory, United Kingdom - 10362 A. W. Banford National Nuclear Laboratory, Risley, Warrington, Cheshire, WA3 6AS, United Kingdom ABSTRACT The United Kingdom (UK) National Nuclear Laboratory (NNL) is establishing four Signature Research Areas, which will underpin the future requirements of the UK nuclear Industry. The management of radioactive waste, nuclear plant and sites at the end of operations is a significant challenge in the UK and internationally. Therefore the NNL Signature Research Area on Legacy Management aims to address this challenge. The key theme of the research area is to inform and underpin the development of strategies for legacy management through an understanding of the nature of the waste inventory, the potential endpoints and the identification of possible processing options. This strategic approach aims to identify the key challenges, identify required evolutionary changes to existing technologies and identify areas in which revolutionary change could make most impact. This paper provides a technical overview of the UK’s National Nuclear Laboratory Signature Research Area on Legacy Management; which will focus on the range of technical areas notably; • strategy development • waste, facility and land characterisation • waste behaviour • decontamination • retrieval and remote deployment • decommissioning techniques • contaminated land and site end points. INTRODUCTION A series of four Signature Research Areas have been identified as being central to the United Kingdom National Nuclear Laboratory mission, to provide independent, authoritative advice on nuclear issues. These areas encompass activities which are of strategic significance to the NNL and both the UK and international nuclear industry. The four areas are defined as follows, • Fuel and Reactors • Spent Fuel and Nuclear Materials [1] • Legacy Waste and Decommissioning • Waste Processing, Storage and Disposal Collectively these areas cover most of the nuclear fuel cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to NDA in Respect of Springfields Nuclear Site
    ENERGY ACT 2004 Directions to the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (the NDA) in respect of the Springfields Nuclear Site Made under sections 3, 4 and 16 of the Energy Act 2004 SPRINGFIELDS SITE SUMMARY This summary is not part of the direction This summary is only intended to provide background information in respect of the Springfields Nuclear Site. It sets out the nature of the operations carried out at the site and the cleaning-up or decommissioning work that may be carried out there. However, subject to Ministerial agreement it is for the NDA, following consultation, to determine what the cleaning-up or decommissioning objectives for the site will be and to describe these in its strategy. Under the Energy Act 2004 where the NDA has been given a responsibility it can secure that such a responsibility is carried out by others. The Springfields site, situated near Preston, is the home of BNFL’s fuel manufacturing operations. Fuel manufacturing represents the vast majority of the operations on site and is the core activity of UK Fuels Business (UKFB). The site’s main product streams are Advanced Gas-Cooled Reactor (AGR) fuel, Magnox fuel, Uranium Hexafluoride (Hex) and enriched intermediate products. It is planned that the production of Hex and Magnox fuel will cease before the production of AGR fuel and enriched intermediate products. The other key site activities include clean-up in the form of decommissioning various facilities and processing of uranic residues. Significant decommissioning work has already been undertaken and completed on the site, however the major tranche of site decommissioning will be carried out after the cessation of Hex conversion and Magnox fuel production on the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning from Past Success: the NPT and the Future of Non-Proliferation
    no 41 Learning from Past Success: The NPT and the Future of Non-proliferation JIM WALSH THE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION COMMISSION www.wmdcommission.org This paper has been commissioned by the Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission. Its purpose is to function as food-for-thought for the work of the Commission. The Commission is not responsible for views expressed in this paper. Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission (WMDC) The WMDC is an independent international commission initiated by the Swedish Government on a proposal from the United Nations. Its task is to present proposals aimed at the greatest possible reduction of the dangers of weapons of mass destruction, including both short-term and long-term approaches and both non-proliferation and disarmament aspects. The Commission will issue its report in early 2006. The commissioners serve in their personal capacity. The Commission is supported by a Secretariat based in Stockholm, Sweden. Members of the Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission Hans Blix, Chairman (Sweden) Dewi Fortuna Anwar (Indonesia) Alexei G Arbatov (Russian Federation) Marcos de Azambuja (Brazil) Alyson Bailes (United Kingdom) Jayantha Dhanapala (Sri Lanka) Gareth Evans (Australia) Patricia Lewis (Ireland) Masashi Nishihara (Japan) William J. Perry (United States of America) Vasantha Raghavan (India) Cheikh Sylla (Senegal) Prince El Hassan bin Talal (Jordan) Pan, Zhenqiang (China) Secretary-General of the Commission Henrik Salander (Sweden) Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission Postal address: SE-103 33 Stockholm, Sweden Visitors’ address: Regeringsgatan 30–32 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.wmdcommission.org Learning from Past Success: The NPT and the Future of Non-proliferation Jim Walsh, Harvard University Paper prepared for the Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission Stockholm, Sweden October, 2005 Lessons from Success: The NPT and the Future of Non-proliferation Jim Walsh, p.
    [Show full text]