DOCSLIB.ORG

World Heritage Forest Indicators

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
World Heritage Forest Indicators World Heritage Forest Database (May 2007) Threat Intensity Coefficient Danger Year WH Site Apx. Forest WH Criteria IUCN Category COUNTRY WH FOREST SITE Biome 1 2 3 4 5 6 Listing Inscribed Size (ha) Cover (ha) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 ON OFF vii viii ix x Ia Ib II III IV V VI n.a. Argentina Iguazu National Park 1984 SbTrop 55,000 55,000 16 14 12 9 9 6 0 0 1 1 1 1 Australia Central Eastern Rainforest Reserves 1986 SbTrop 370,000 370,000 12 12 12 12 5 5 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Australia Fraser Island 1992 SbTrop 166,283 166,283 24 24 24 24 17 10 0 0 1 1 1 Australia Kakadu National Park 1981 Trop 1,980,400 1,934,400 68 73 78 81 86 76 0 0 1 1 1 1 Australia Tasmanian Wilderness 1982 Temp 1,081,348 1,081,348 81 71 64 55 43 46 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Australia Wetland Tropics of Queensland 1988 Trop 894,420 894,420 58 56 47 40 33 23 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Bangladesh/India The Sunderbans National Park 1987 Trop 728,000 678,500 36 41 41 34 34 27 0 0 1 1 1 Belarus/Poland Beloveshskaya Pushcha/Bialowieza 1979 Temp 92,916 92,916 60 53 58 63 68 73 0 0 1 1 Forest Bolivia Noel Kempff Mercado National Park 2000 Trop 1,523,446 1,520,196 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 Brazil Atlantic Forest Southeast Reserves 1999 Trop 470,000 470,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 Brazil Brazilian Atlantic Islands (Fernando Noronha archipelago and Atoll das 2001 Trop 42,270 2,600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 Rocas) Brazil Central Amazon Conservation 2000 Trop 6,096,000 6,076,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 Complex Brazil Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Empas National 2001 Trop 197,382 105,074 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 Parks Brazil Discovery Coast Atlantic Forest 1999 Trop 111,930 111,930 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 Reserves Brazil Iguaçu National Park 1986 SbTrop 185,262 170,000 65 56 49 54 68 73 1999 2001 1 1 1 Brazil Pantanal Conservation Area 2000 Trop 187,818 187,818 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 Bulgaria Pirin National Park 1983 Temp 27,400 16,440 27 39 51 63 68 53 0 0 1 1 1 1 Cameroon Dja Faunal Reserve 1987 Trop 526,000 526,000 60 53 58 63 68 73 0 0 1 1 1 Canada Canadian Rocky Mountains Parks 1984 Bor 2,306,884 1,153,442 58 51 44 37 40 50 0 0 1 1 1 1 Canada Gros Morne National Park 1987 Bor 180,500 162,450 24 24 24 24 17 10 0 0 1 1 1 Canada Nahanni National Park 1978 Bor 476,560 476,560 5 12 24 36 36 36 0 0 1 1 1 Canada Wood Buffalo National Park 1983 Bor 4,480,000 4,480,000 11 21 33 42 42 39 0 0 1 1 1 1 Canada/USA Waterton Lakes Glacier International 1995 Bor 457,614 457,614 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 Peace Park China Huanglong Scenic and Historical 1992 Temp 70,000 70,000 12 12 5 5 5 5 0 0 1 1 Interest Area Threat Intensity Coefficient Danger Year WH Site Apx. Forest WH Criteria IUCN Category COUNTRY WH FOREST SITE Biome 1 2 3 4 5 6 Listing Inscribed Size (ha) Cover (ha) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 ON OFF vii viii ix x Ia Ib II III IV V VI n.a. China Jiuzhaigou Valley Scenic and Historic 1992 Temp 72,000 72,000 18 17 10 10 10 10 0 0 1 1 Interest Area China Mount Huangshan 1990 Temp 15,400 15,400 17 17 10 10 10 8 0 0 1 1 1 China Mount Taishan 1987 Temp 25,000 20,000 12 12 5 5 5 5 0 0 1 1 China Mount Emei 1996 SbTrop 15,400 13,400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 China Mount Wuyi 1999 SbTrop 99,975 99,927 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 China Three Parallel Rivers of Yunnan 2003 Temp 1,698,419 1,698,419 60 60 60 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Protected Areas China Sichuan Giant Panda Sanctuaries 2006 Temp 924,500 924500 00 1 1 1 Colombia Los Katios National Park 1994 Trop 72,000 72,000 48 48 42 34 27 20 0 0 1 1 1 Costa Rica Area de Conservation Guanacaste 1999 Trop 88,000 88,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 Costa Rica Cocos Island National Park 1997 Trop 197,400 2,390 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 Costa Talamanca Range - La Amistad 1983 Trop 791,592 791,592 28 19 29 29 26 23 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rica/Panama Reserves /La Amistad NP Cote d'Ivoire Comoe National Park 1983 Trop 1,149,250 1,149,250 27 27 39 44 49 58 2003 2006 11 1 Cote d'Ivoire Tai National Park 1982 Trop 330,000 330,000 12 12 21 30 27 24 0 0 1 1 1 Cote d'Ivoire Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve 1981 Trop 35,130 35,130 97 97 100 100 100 100 1992 2006 111 Croatia Plitvice Lakes National Park 1979 Temp 29,482 20,889 52 43 34 32 30 25 1992 1997 1 1 1 Cuba Alejandro de Humboldt National Park 2001 Trop 71,140 68,890 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 DR Congo Kahuzi-Biega National Park 1980 Trop 600,000 600,000 73 78 83 86 89 91 1997 2006 11 DR Congo Okapi Wildlife Reserve 1996 Trop 1,375,625 1,375,625 60 85 85 85 80 85 1997 2006 11 DR Congo Salonga National Park 1984 Trop 3,600,000 3,600,000 36 48 60 65 70 75 1999 2006 11 1 DR Congo Virunga National Park 1979 Trop 790,000 632,000 80 85 88 91 94 97 1994 2006 1111 Dominica Morne Trois Pitons National Park 1997 Trop 6,857 6,857 45 36 49 37 22 15 0 0 1 1 1 Ecuador Sangay National Park 1983 Trop 271,925 271,925 94 97 100 100 100 100 1992 2005 1 1 1 1 Guatemala Tikal National Park 1979 Trop 57,600 57,600 17 17 8 8 8 8 0 0 1 1 1 Honduras Rio Platano Biosphere Reserve 1982 Trop 500,000 500,000 68 73 78 80 85 88 1996 2006 1111 1 India Manas Wildlife Sanctuary 1985 Trop 39,100 39,100 91 94 97 97 97 100 1992 2006 111 1 Indonesia Lorentz National Park 1999 Trop 2,505,600 2,505,600 60 60 60 60 65 70 0 0 1 1 1 1 Indonesia Tropical Rainforest Heritage of 2004 Trop 2,595,124 2,595,124 60 60 0 0 1 1 1 1 Sumatra Indonesia Ujung Kulon National Park 1991 Trop 78,359 76,200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 Japan Shirakami - Sanchi 1993 SbTrop 16,971 16,971 20 13 10 10 8 8 0 0 1 1 Japan Shiretoko 2005 Temp 561,000 532,450 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 Japan Yakushima (Yaku - island) 1993 SbTrop 10,747 10,747 12 6 5 5 5 5 0 0 1 1 1 1 Kenya Mount Kenya National Park/Natural 1997 Trop 142,071 142,071 45 36 48 49 34 27 0 0 1 1 1 1 Forest Madagascar Tsingy de Bemaraha Strict Nature 1990 Trop 152,000 152,000 5 8 5 4 3 3 0 0 1 1 1 Reserve Threat Intensity Coefficient Danger Year WH Site Apx. Forest WH Criteria IUCN Category COUNTRY WH FOREST SITE Biome 1 2 3 4 5 6 Listing Inscribed Size (ha) Cover (ha) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 ON OFF vii viii ix x Ia Ib II III IV V VI n.a. Malaysia Gunung Mulu National Park 2000 Trop 52,864 52,864 60 60 40 30 24 17 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 Malaysia Kinabalu Park 2000 Trop 75,370 75,370 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 Mexico Sian Ka'an Biosphere Reserve 1987 Trop 528,000 408,000 12 24 36 48 48 41 0 0 1 1 1 Montenegro Durmitor National Park 1980 Temp 34,000 34,000 47 38 29 29 39 34 0 0 1 1 1 1 Nepal Royal Chitwan National Park 1984 Temp 93,200 78,200 47 52 55 67 64 54 0 0 1 1 1 1 New Zealand Te Wahipounamu 1990 Temp 2,600,000 2,000,000 39 42 39 40 31 31 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 New Zealand Tongariro National Park 1990 Temp 79,596 79,596 41 53 46 39 37 30 0 0 1 1 1 Panama Coiba National Park and its special 2005 Trop 270,100 53,500 0 0 0 1 1 1 Zone of Marine Protection Panama Darien National Park 1981 Trop 597,000 597,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 Peru Historic Santuary of Machu Picchu 1983 Trop 32,592 32,592 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 Peru Manu National Park 1987 Trop 1,532,806 1,532,806 8 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 Peru Rio Abiseo National Park 1990 Trop 274,520 274,520 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 Phillipines Puerto Princesa Subterranean River 1999 Trop 20,202 20,202 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 National Park Portugal Laurisilva of Madeira 1999 SbTrop 15,000 15,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 Russian Central Sikhote-Alin 2001 Temp 1,557,523 1,557,523 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 Federation Russian Lake Baikal 1996 Bor 8,800,000 5,650,000 60 85 85 85 80 85 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Federation Russian Virgin Komi Forests 1995 Bor 3,280,000 1,672,800 24 25 17 13 10 10 0 0 1 1 1 1 Federation Senegal Niokola- Koba National Park 1981 Trop 913,000 913,000 49 44 39 36 26 28 0 0 1 1 Seychelles Vallee de Mai Nature Reserve 1983 Trop 18 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 Solomon Islands East Rennell 1998 Trop 37,000 21,500 0 0 12 12 24 24 0 0 1 1 South Africa Greater St.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fire Probability in South American Protected Areas
    Technical Note Fire probability in South American Protected Areas August to October 2020 South American authors: Liana O. Anderson, João B. C. dos Reis, Ana Carolina M. Pessôa, Galia Selaya, Luiz Aragão UK authors: Chantelle Burton, Philip Bett, Chris Jones, Karina Williams, Inika Taylor, Andrew Wiltshire August 2020 1 HOW TO CITE THIS WORK ANDERSON Liana O.; BURTON Chantelle; DOS REIS João B. C.; PESSÔA Ana C. M.; SELAYA Galia; BETT Philip, JONES Chris, WILLIAMS Karina; TAYLOR Inika; WILTSHIRE, Andrew, ARAGÃO Luiz. Fire probability in South American Protected Areas: August to October 2020. 16p. São José dos Campos, 2020.SEI/Cemaden process: 01250.029118/2018-78/5761326. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13727.79523 Contact: [email protected] Institutions Met Office Hadley Centre – United Kingdom Centro Nacional de Monitoramento e Alerta de Desastres Naturais - Brazil Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais – Brazil This Technical Note was prepared with the support of the following projects: CSSP-BRAZIL - Climate Science for Service Partnership (CSSP) Brazil. Fund: Newton Fund MAP-FIRE – Multi-Actor Adaptation Plan to cope with Forests under Increasing Risk of Extensive fires Fund: Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI-SGP-HW 016) PRODIGY BMBF biotip Project – Process‐based & Resilience‐Oriented management of Diversity Generates sustainabilitY Fund: German BMBF biotip Project FKZ 01LC1824A João B. C. dos Reis and Ana C. M. Pessôa were funded by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq - 444321/2018-7 and 140977/2018-5, respectively). Luiz Aragão was funded by CNPq Productivity fellowship (305054/2016-3). Liana Anderson acknowledges EasyTelling, and the projects: CNPq (ACRE-QUEIMADAS 442650/2018-3, SEM-FLAMA 441949/2018-5), São Paulo Research Foundation – (FAPESP 19/05440-5, 2016/02018-2).
    [Show full text]
  • Natural World Heritage in Latin America and the Caribbean
    Natural World Heritage in Latin America and the Caribbean Options to promote an Underutilized Conservation Instrument An independent review prepared for IUCN Tilman Jaeger, 2013 Table of Contents Acknowledgments .................................................................................................. iii 1. Background............................................................................................................... 1 2. Approach, objectives and structure ........................................................................... 1 3. Results ...................................................................................................................... 2 3.1 Natural World Heritage in the Region: Numbers and Patterns ............................. 2 3.2 Conceptual Considerations and Perceived Bottlenecks ....................................... 5 4. Conclusions and Recommendations for IUCN .......................................................... 7 4.1 More meaningful involvement of the regional and sub-regional nature conservation communities in formal World Heritage processes ................................. 7 4.2 Refining the "Global Biodiversity Gap Analysis" and "Upstream Support" ............ 8 4.3 Re-visiting existing properties .............................................................................. 9 4.4 Regional networking and capacity development ................................................ 11 4.5 Communication, Education and Awareness-Raising ......................................... 12
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Overview of Wetland and Marine Protected Areas on the World Heritage List
    A GLOBAL OVERVIEW OF WETLAND AND MARINE PROTECTED AREAS ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST A Contribution to the Global Theme Study of World Heritage Natural Sites Prepared by Jim Thorsell, Renee Ferster Levy and Todd Sigaty Natural Heritage Programme lUCN Gland, Switzerland September 1997 WORLD CONSERVATION MONITORING CENTRE lUCN The World Conservation Union 530S2__ A GLOBAL OVERVIEW OF WETLAND AND MARINE PROTECTED AREAS ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST A Contribution to the Global Theme Study of Wodd Heritage Natural Sites Prepared by Jim Thorsell. Renee Ferster Levy and Todd Sigaty Natural Heritage Program lUCN Gland. Switzerland September 1997 Working Paper 1: Earth's Geological History - A Contextual Framework Assessment of World Heritage Fossil Site Nominations Working Paper 2: A Global Overview of Wetland and Marine Protected Areas on the World Heritage List Working Paper 3; A Global Overview of Forest Protected Areas on the World Heritage List Further volumes (in preparation) on biodiversity, mountains, deserts and grasslands, and geological features. Digitized by tine Internet Arciiive in 2010 witii funding from UNEP-WCIVIC, Cambridge littp://www.arcliive.org/details/globaloverviewof97glob . 31 TABLE OF CONTE>rrS PAGE I. Executive Summary (e/f) II. Introduction 1 III. Tables & Figures Table 1 . Natural World Heritage sites with primary wetland and marine values 1 Table 2. Natural World Heritage sites with secondary wetland and marine values 12 Table 3. Natural World Heritage sites inscribed primarily for their freshwater wetland values 1 Table 4. Additional natural World Heritage sites with significant freshwater wetland values 14 Tables. Natural World Heritage sites with a coastal/marine component 15 Table 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Peru and Unesco: Key Facts and Figures
    PERU AND UNESCO: KEY FACTS AND FIGURES 1. Membership in UNESCO: 21 November 1946 2. Membership on the Executive Board: No (last mandate 2009-2013) 3. Membership on Intergovernmental Committees, Commissions: 9 2021: Legal Committee 2021: Subsidiary Committee of the Meeting of States Parties to the 1970 Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property 2020: SDG-Education 2030 Steering Committee 2019: International Coordinating Council of the Programme on Man and the Biosphere 2019: Intergovernmental Council for the International Hydrological Programme Member 2019: Headquarters Committee 2019: Intergovernmental Council for the Information for All Programme 2019: Intergovernmental Committee for the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions Member Permanent membership: Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission 4. DG visits to the country: None 5. Former Director-General’s visits to the country: 1 in 2011 6. Permanent Delegation to UNESCO Ambassador Víctor Ricardo LUNA MENDOZA, Permanent Delegate to UNESCO (since September 2018) 7. UNESCO Office: Yes Established in 1995 National Office headed by Mr Ernesto Fernandez Polcuch (Argentina) (since 1 November 2019) 8. Peruvian National Commission for UNESCO (Comisión Nacional Peruana de Cooperación con la UNESCO) Establishment: October 1947 President/Chairperson: Ms Flor Aidee Pablo Medina, Minister of Education Secretary-General: Ms María Amelia Trigoso Technical Coordinator: Ms
    [Show full text]
  • Folleto Naturaleza
    Nature in Protected Natural Areas Cocha, Tambopata © Inkaterra Enjoy Peru’s amazing sunsets, its exuberant flora and fauna, and the majesty of its Amazonian rivers. Nature is all you need and in Peru it is everywhere! Pacaya Samiria National Reserve © Janine Costa / PROMPERÚ Lagoon 69, Áncash © Daniel Silva / PROMPERÚ Huascarán National Park Trek the Alpamayo, the most beautiful snow-capped mountain in the world, and Huascarán, at 6768 meters above sea level the highest mountain in Peru. The easiest way to reach the park is via the city of Huaraz. Enjoy the impressive Santa Cruz Trek (4 days), trekking to an elevation of 4750 meters and admiring beautiful snowed-capped peaks along the way, together with a walk (up to 3 hours or more) to Lagoon 69, with its fabulous turquoise color. Recommended visit duration: 4 to 6 days Region: Áncash From 2500 meters 340,000 hectares to 6768 meters From May 2 °C - 25 °C From December to September L to March Lake Sandoval, Tambopata © Inkaterra Tambopata National Reserve A land rich in flora and fauna, with approximately 632 species of birds, 205 fish species, 112 species of diurnal buerflies, among many others. You will find the giant oer, the harpy eagle, the tapir, the anaconda, the jaguar, and the ocelot. Take a journey among daydream orchids from Puerto Maldonado to Lake Sandoval. Finally, don’t miss Collpas, Chuncho, and Colorado, the spectacular homes of parrots and macaws that feed on the clay of the cliffs. Recommended visit duration: 3 days and 2 nights Region: Madre de Dios 180 meters 274,690 hectares From May 10 °C - 38 °C From December to October Annual average: 26 °C to March Lake Sandoval, Tambopata © Inkaterra Manu National Park The park is recognized by UNESCO as the Core Zone of the Manu Biosphere Reserve and is a Natural World Heritage Site.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Funding Landscape for Biodiversity Conservation in Peru
    MAPPING THE FUNDING LANDSCAPE FOR BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN PERU BY KATIA SOFIA NAKAMURA LAM THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2017 Urbana, Illinois Master’s Committee: Assistant Professor Daniel C. Miller, Adviser Associate Professor Richard Brazee Dr. Anthony Waldron, National University of Singapore ABSTRACT Financial resources are crucial to effective biodiversity conservation. Globally, research shoWs that conservation-related eXpenditures are directed toWards countries of high biodiversity importance, even as funding floWs are Well beloW estimates of financial need. The absence of sufficient funding makes the effective and efficient use of the available resources even more imperative. Empirical evidence on previous funding floWs is necessary to develop a baseline for comparison, identification of funding gaps, and assessment of ultimate impacts. To date, hoWever, knoWledge of the distribution of funding Within countries remains very limited. This study, therefore, analyzes the conservation funding landscape in Peru, a mega-diverse country, to shed light on the nature and trends of support for biodiversity and the factors shaping funding allocation at the sub-national level. I carried out desk-based and field research to collect as much data as possible on conservation finance in Peru from 2009, the year the Peruvian Ministry of the Environment Was founded, to 2015, the last year for which full data were available. Information collected covered a range of public and private, domestic and international sources. Overall, I found that 19% of the funding for conservation in Peru derived from domestic sources and 81% from international ones during the study period.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Design Document
    BIOCORREDOR MARTIN SAGRADO REDD+ PROJECT Project Design Document Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation San Martin Department, Peru A Community Forestry Initiative for Carbon and Biodiversity Conservation and Poverty Reduction Version 4.0 – December 2012 PROJECT DEVELOPER TECHNICAL PARTNER FOR IMPLEMENTATION 1 PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FOR REDUCING EMISSIONS FROM DEFORESTATION AND FOREST DEGRADATION (REDD) Table of Contents I. GENERAL INFORMATION II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY III. GENERAL SECTION G1. Original Conditions at the Project Site G2. Baseline Projections G3. Project Design and Goals G4. Management Capacity G5. Land Tenure and legal status G6. Adaptive Management for Sustainability G7. Knowledge Dissemination IV. CLIMATE SECTION CL1. Net Positive Climate Impacts CL2. Offsite Climate Impacts (“Leakage”) CL3. Climate Impact Monitoring CL4. Adapting to Climate Change and Climate Variability CL5. Carbon Benefits Withheld from Regulatory Markets V. COMMUNITY SECTION CM1. Net Positive Community Impacts CM2. Offsite Community Impacts CM3. Community Impact Monitoring CM4. Capacity Building CM5. Best Practices in Community Involvement VI. BIODIVERSITY SECTION B1. Net Positive Impacts B2. Offsite Biodiversity Impacts B3. Biodiversity Impact Monitoring B4. Use of Native Species B5. Water and Soil Resource Enhancement VII. GOLD LEVEL SECTION GL1. Climate Change Adaption Benefits GL2. Exceptional Community Benefits GL3. Exceptional Biodiversity Benefits 2 I. GENERAL INFORMATION Location of the project Country: Peru Department: San Martin Nearest City: Juan Jui, Provinces of Mariscal Caceres and Huallaga Precise location of project activities: Located in the western part of San Martín Region of Peru, in the basin of Huayabamba river, the project area extends over 303 699 hectares, constituded by three land concessions with conservation purposes: Martin Sagrado, El Breo, Montecristo.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Overview of Mountain Protected Areas on the World Heritage List
    A GLOBAL OVERVIEW OF MOUNTAIN PROTECTED AREAS ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST A Contribution to the Global Theme Study of World Heritage Natural Sites Working Paper 6 Prepared by Jim Thorsell, Senior Advisor, World Heritage, IUCN and Larry Hamilton, Vice Chair-Mountains, World Commission on Protected Areas September, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 1. Background to IUCN’s Global Strategy Theme Studies 2. Objectives of this Working Paper 3. What is a World Heritage mountain? 4. Method, Data Sources and a Caveat 5. Format of the Overview 6. Analysis of Mountain Protected Areas on the World Heritage List 6.1 Current number of mountain World Heritage sites 6.2 Criteria used for mountain World Heritage site inscriptions 6.3 Global distribution of mountain World Heritage sites 6.4 Size of mountain World Heritage sites 6.5 Transfrontier World Heritage sites in mountains 6.6 Human Use of World Heritage sites in mountains 7. Suggestions for additional mountain protected area nominations to the World Heritage List 7.1 Sites deferred by the Committee which may merit re-nomination 7.2 Mountain Sites nominated and currently under evaluation for future World Heritage Committee meetings 7.3 Existing Mountain World Heritage Sites where boundary extensions should and are being considered 7.4 Additional mountain protected areas that have been suggested for nomination to the World Heritage List 8. Discussion 9. Acknowledgements ANNEXES 1. World Heritage Sites with a “mountainous” character but which do not meet minimum relief or size criteria 2. Location map of existing mountain World Heritage sites 3. Summary site descriptions of existing mountain World Heritage sites 3 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is the sixth in IUCN’s series of Working Papers which provide global overviews of natural World Heritage sites in the major biomes on earth.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Overview of Protected Areas on the World Heritage List of Particular Importance for Biodiversity
    A GLOBAL OVERVIEW OF PROTECTED AREAS ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST OF PARTICULAR IMPORTANCE FOR BIODIVERSITY A contribution to the Global Theme Study of World Heritage Natural Sites DRAFT Text and Tables compiled by Gemma Smith and Janina Jakubowska Maps compiled by Ian May UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre Cambridge, UK July 2000 I >\~ l lUCN UNEP WCMC The World Conservation Union Disclaimer: The contents of this report and associated maps do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organisations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1.0 Overview 1 2.0 Issues TO Consider 1 3.0 What IS Biodiversity? 2 4.0 Assessment methodology 3 5.0 Current World Heritage Sites 4 5.1 Criterion (IV) 4 5.2 World Heritage Sites IN Danger 4 5.3 Case Studies 5 6.0 Biogeographical Coverage 5 6.1 Udvardy Biogeographical Provinces 5 6.2 Bailey's Ecoregions 6 7.0 Key Prioritisation Programme Areas 6 7.1 WWF Global 200 Ecoregions 6 7.2 Centres of Plant Diversity (CPD) 6 7.3 Conservation International - Biodiversity Hotspots 7 7.4 Vavilov Centres of Plant Genetic Diversity 8 7.5 Endemic Bird Areas (EBAs) 8 8.0 Key Areas for Identified Species 9 8.1 Critically Endangered Taxa 9 8.2 Marine Turtles 9 9.0 Key Habitat Areas 1 9.1 Ramsar sites 11 9.2 Marine Biodiversity 1 9.3 Coral Reefs and Mangroves 1 10.0 Key Findings 12 11.0 Possible Future World Heritage Sites 13 12.0 Limitations of THE study 14 13.0 Conclusions AND Recommendations for Future Work 15 REFERENCES TABLES Table 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • WWF Environmental and Social Safeguards Categorization Memorandum
    WWF Environmental and Social Safeguards Categorization Memorandum Project Title: Peru’s Natural Legacy – Amazon Climate (PdP-AC) Date: 10/05/2020 Project Location and salient physical characteristics relevant to the safeguard Project analysis: Categorization (A,B,C): B The ‘PdP-Amazonía y Clima’ Project concerns 25 ANP and 12 of their buffer zones in four landscapces (Northern, Northwest, Central, and Southeastern). This includes: • 12 National Parks (NP) and 4 of their buffer zones; • 4 National Sanctuaries (NS); • 1 Historic Sanctuary (HS) and its buffer zone; • 5 National Reservs (NR) and their 5 buffer zones; • 3 Protection Forests (PF) and 2 of their buffer zones. • Northern Zone In the northern landscape of the Project, potential beneficiaries of the Project will be: • the National Parks Ichigkat Muja – Cordillera del Cóndor, Güeppí-Sekime, Sierra del Divisor y Yaguas, without their buffer zones (ZA); • the National Sanctuaries Tabaconas Namballe and Cordillera de Colán, without their ZA; • the National Reserves Pacaya Samiria, Allpahuayo Mishana, Matsés and Pucacuro, and their ZA. Most of their ecosystems belong to the lowland rainforest ecoregion (Selva Baja). Highland Rainforest (Selva Alta) occurs at higher elevations in the Ichigkat Muja – Cordillera del Cóndor and Sierra del Divisor National Parks, and puna, páramo and cloud forest in the two National Sanctuaries. 1. PN12. Ichigkat Muja – Cordillera del Cóndor National Park Ichigkat Muja – Cordillera del Cóndor National Park includes alsmost 88 000 ha of Lowland Rainforest and Montane Forest at the border with Ecuador, at elevations between 50 and 3,000 m.a.s.l. It was established in 2007 for the protection of a representative sample of the ecoregion ‘Montane Forest of the Cordillera Real Oriental’, which includes the famous ‘Cordillera del Cóndor’, and to protect the upper catchments of the Santiago and Cenepa rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Peru and Unesco: Key Facts and Figures I. Country
    PERU AND UNESCO: KEY FACTS AND FIGURES I. COUNTRY PROFILE Political system • The country is a Presidential Republic. The President is both Head of State and Head of Government; Cabinet is appointed by the President. • President of the Republic: Mr Martín Alberto VIZCARRA CORNEJO (since 23 March 2018). He was elected as Vice-President in 2016 at the Presidential election won by Pedro Pablo Kuczynski. On 21 March 2018, the resignation of President Kuczynski was accepted by the Parliament on 23 March 2018 and Mr Vizcarra assumed the Presidency (Constitutional rule). • Minister of Foreign Affairs: Mr Gustavo Adolfo Meza-Cuadra Velásquez (since 3 October 2019) • Elections: President directly elected by absolute majority popular vote in two rounds if needed for a 5-year term (eligible for nonconsecutive terms. Next election to be held in April 2021. Statistical data (source: UNDP Human Development Report) • Total population (million): 32 • Human Development Index: 0.759 / 82e rank • Life expectancy at birth (years): 76.5 • Gross national income (GNI) per capita (2011 PPP$): 12,323 • Internet users (% of population): 45.5% • Carbon dioxide emissions per capita (tones): 1.7 Education (source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics) • Expected years of schooling (years): 13.8 • Compulsory education (years): 14 (from age 3 to 16) • Net enrolment ratio in primary education (%): 95.35% • Government expenditure on education (% of GDP): 3.8% II. COOPERATION WITH UNESCO 1. Membership in UNESCO: 21 November 1946 2. Membership on the Executive Board: No (last
    [Show full text]
  • The Northern Peru Birding Route Stretches Population of White-Winged Guans
    spectacular adobe burial pyramids from the Sican culture that rise above the and Yellow-scarfed Tanager, White-capped Tanager. Garcia Ridges, a series of provide accommodation and food for visitors. The area supports a range of The forest. For birders this is the best site to find the endangered endemic small ridges with stunted forest and cliffs is the best area to find the Royal lowland species including: 5 species of Kingfisher, Agami Heron, Slender-billed MID-MARAÑON VALLEY The spectacular deep canyon of the Marañon valley contains a variety of arid Peruvian Plantcutter and a suite of other Tumbesian endemics including Sunangel which can usually be found along the road feeding at flowering Kite, Cream-coloured Woodpecker, and Varzea Thrush. On the road to scrub-like ecosystems and agricultural areas near the town of Balsas. The dry Rufous Flycatcher, Tumbes Swallow, Coastal Miner, and Tumbes Tyrant. Local shrubs. A side trail here passes through land owned by EcoAn and access Tarapoto, Cañon Quiscarrumi is a breeding site for Oilbirds. A few can be seen cactus scrub of the lower valley is home to Buff-bridled Inca-Finch and guides are available at the reserve entrance and there are good should be arranged at Owlet Lodge. The area is very good for tanager flocks. by looking down from the road-bridge in the daytime but their emergence at Northern Black-necked Woodpecker. Yellow-faced Parrotlet and Peruvian Pigeon favour accommodation and restaurants nearby. The Laquipampa Wildlife Refuge in The area around Alto Nieva has stunted forest and is particularly good for dusk is the most spectacular way to see them.
    [Show full text]