DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix a Basics of Landfill

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix a Basics of Landfill APPENDIX A BASICS OF LANDFILL GAS Basics of Landfill Gas (Methane, Carbon Dioxide, Hydrogen Sulfide and Sulfides) Landfill gas is produced through bacterial decomposition, volatilization and chemical reactions. Most landfill gas is produced by bacterial decomposition that occurs when organic waste solids, food (i.e. meats, vegetables), garden waste (i.e. leaf and yardwaste), wood and paper products, are broken down by bacteria naturally present in the waste and in soils. Volatilization generates landfill gas when certain wastes change from a liquid or solid into a vapor. Chemical reactions occur when different waste materials are mixed together during disposal operations. Additionally, moisture plays a large roll in the speed of decomposition. Generally, the more moisture, the more landfill gas is generated, both during the aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Landfill Gas Production and Composition: In general, during anaerobic conditions, the composition of landfill gas is approximately 50 percent methane and 50 percent carbon dioxide with trace amounts (<1 percent) of nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen sulfide, hydrogen, and nonmethane organic compounds (NMOCs). The more organic waste and moisture present in a landfill, the more landfill gas is produced by the bacteria during decomposition. The more chemicals disposed in a landfill, the more likely volatile organic compounds and other gasses will be produced. The Four Phases of Bacterial Decomposition: “Bacteria decompose landfill waste in four phases. The composition of the gas produced changes with each of the four phases of decomposition. Landfills often accept waste over a 20-to 30-year period, so waste in a landfill may be undergoing several phases of decomposition at once. This means that waste in one area might be in a different phase of decomposition than more recently buried waste in another area. Phase I: During the first phase of decomposition, aerobic bacteria-bacteria that live only in the presence of oxygen-consume oxygen while breaking down the long molecular chains of complex carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids that comprise organic waste. The primary byproduct of this process is carbon dioxide. Nitrogen content is high at the beginning of this phase, but declines as the landfill moves through the four phases. Phase I continues until available oxygen is depleted. Phase I decomposition could last for days or months, depending on how much oxygen is present when the waste is disposed of in the landfill. Oxygen levels will vary according to factors such as how loose or compressed the waste was when it was buried. Phase II: Phase II decomposition starts after the oxygen in the landfill has been used up. Using an anaerobic process (a process that does not require oxygen), bacteria convert compounds created by aerobic bacteria into acetic, lactic, and formic acids and alcohols such as methanol and ethanol. The landfill becomes highly acidic. As the acids mix with the moisture present in the landfill, they cause certain nutrients to dissolve, making nitrogen and phosphorus available to the increasingly diverse species of bacteria in the landfill. The gaseous byproducts of these processes are carbon dioxide and hydrogen. If the landfill is disturbed or if oxygen is somehow introduced into the landfill, microbial processes will return to Phase I. 1 Phase III: Phase III decomposition starts when certain kinds of anaerobic bacteria consume organic acids produced in the Phase II and form acetate, an organic acid. This process causes the landfill to become a more neutral environment in which methane-producing bacteria begin to establish themselves. Methane-and acid-producing bacteria have a symbiotic, or mutual beneficial, relationship. Acid-producing bacteria create compounds for the methanogenic bacteria to consume. Methanogenic bacteria consume the carbon dioxide and acetate, too much of which would be toxic to the acid-producing bacteria. Phase IV: Phase IV decomposition begins when both the composition and production rates of landfill gas remain relatively constant. Phase IV landfill gas usually contains approximately 45 percent to 60 percent methane by volume, 40 percent to 60 percent carbon dioxide and 2 percent to 9 percent other gasses, such as sulfide. Gas is produced at a stable rate in Phase IV, typically for about 20 years; however, gas will continue to be emitted for 50 or more years after the waste is placed in the landfill (Crawford and Smith 1985). Gas production might last longer, for example, if greater amounts organics are present in the waste, such as at a landfill receiving higher than average amounts of domestic animal waste" (ATSDR, 2001). Due to the fact that refuse is placed in a landfill at different times and consists of different types of solid waste at different moisture content, all four phases of degradation may be occurring simultaneously within the landfill. Factors Affecting Landfill Gas Production: Gas production rates depend on the rate of decomposition, which in turn is affected by moisture content of the waste, temperature, soil cover permeability, amount of precipitation, composition of the waste, refuse particle size, compaction, and landfilling practices. Moisture is essential for bacterial survival. Ideal moisture content for decomposition is one that approaches saturation. Biological reactions can be retarded if moisture content drops below 40 percent and essentially stops when moisture content is below 20 percent. Thus, in very dry climates, methanogenic (methane producing) decomposition will have a very small possibility of occurring. Methane will be produced only when oxygen (O2) is no longer present in the landfill. Capping of a landfill with a low permeability layer reduces the available moisture, thus retarding landfill gas production. Smaller particles decompose more quickly due to the high surface area to mass ratio. Thus, shredded waste produces gas more quickly than non-shredded waste. For additional information on landfill gas production and composition refer to Chapter 7 of MassDEP’s “Landfill Technical Guidance Manual” (http://www.mass.gov/dep/recycle/laws/policies.htm). Figure 1: Production Phases of Typical Landfill Gas 2 Hydrogen Sulfide and Sulfides: Sulfides are naturally occurring gasses that often give a landfill gas mixture its rotten egg smell. Sulfides can cause unpleasant odors even at very low concentrations. Hydrogen sulfide is a colorless, flammable gas and is one of the most common sulfides responsible for landfill odors. Some people can smell hydrogen sulfide (individual’s odor threshold) at concentrations as low as 0.5 parts per billion (ppb). However, the odor threshold can vary significantly among individuals based on the olfactory sensitivity of 3 the person. For many compounds, including hydrogen sulfide, there is a wide variability in published odor thresholds (refer to Table 1). Odors alone cannot be relied upon as providing an early warning for elevated concentrations of hydrogen sulfide. "At concentrations around 100 ppm,” (parts per million) “no odor is detected due to a loss of olfactory sensation, resulting in loss of warning properties at lethal levels." (Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS)). Hydrogen sulfide is more dense than air, and therefore, more likely to pool at lower elevations under still conditions, depending upon topography. Hydrogen sulfide is found naturally in the environment and is also produced from man-made processes. Hydrogen sulfide occurs naturally in crude petroleum, natural gas, volcanic gasses, hot springs, and tidal flats and can also be produced from bacterial breakdown of organic matter. Hydrogen sulfide is produced by human and animal waste, and landfilling of solid waste, and can result from industrial activities such as food processing, coke ovens, paper mills, tanneries and petroleum refineries, to name a few. Dimethyl sulfide and mercaptans are sulfides that can also cause odors but typically are not emitted from a landfill at the high concentrations or at production rates associated with hydrogen sulfide. The concentration of hydrogen sulfide detected in landfill gas samples at solid waste landfills that receive construction and demolition (C&D) waste is usually much higher than at landfills that do not accept C&D. The higher concentrations of hydrogen sulfide are believed to be associated with the gypsum board component (e.g. wallboard) present in C&D material. The combination of gypsum, organic material, moisture and anaerobic conditions present in C&D landfills is believed to provide a favorable mixture and environment for bacteria to produce hydrogen sulfide gas. Concentrations of hydrogen sulfide detected in raw landfill gas samples, collected from within a landfill waste mass, have ranged from 50,000 ppb to 15,000,000 ppb (50 ppm - 15,000 ppm) for those landfills that accepted C&D solid waste. Landfills which do not accept C&D typically have much lower concentrations of hydrogen sulfide in the raw gas, usually less than 100,000 ppb (100 ppm). Hydrogen sulfide is generated as a result of a series of reactions that biologically reduce sulfate leached from gypsum contained in the C&D. In general, wallboard consists of the gypsum core (CaSO4 x 2H2O) with facing and backing consisting of paper. The microorganisms responsible for generating hydrogen sulfide include sulfate-reducing bacteria and sulfur-reducing bacteria (Florida, 2002). Sulfate reducing bacteria require the following to produce hydrogen sulfide: a sulfate source (gypsum), a carbon source
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biogas for Agriculture
    2007 IGER INNOVATIONS Biogas for agriculture Phil Hobbs, Alastair Ward and Guillermo Pardo Biogas feedstock 44 Current research 44 2007 IGER INNOVATIONS Biogas for agriculture Phil Hobbs, Alastair Ward and Guillermo Pardo he production of biogas as a fuel obtained from Biogas feedstock B I the fermentation of organic wastes has undoubted O Livestock manure slurry is the main source of G A Tbenefits for the environment . These benefits include feedstock for biogas production, having a dry matter S F both reduced methane emissions from livestock content of about 5 -15% w/w, but potentially a wide O R enterprises and the production of green energy which range of organic wastes can be used as starter A G can be fed into the national electricity grid. The heat materials, ranging from fats and greases to vegetable R I C generated from biogas production can also be used wastes . Some potential sources, such as food and U L T locally for heating livestock buildings or hot water. abattoir wastes , would need to be heat -treated before U R E Biogas is about 70% methane and 30% CO 2. The use as a biogas feedstock as a biosecurity measure, actual methane producers are microbes known as however, in order to prevent any contained ‘methanogens ’. These belong to some of the oldest pathogens escaping to reinfect farm livestock via groups of organisms on the planet , known as the grazing or other crop sources. Organic wastes Archaea . They are common in wetlands, where they imported onto the farm are also a good source of are responsible for producing marsh gas , and are also nutrients for spreading on the land and can commonly found in the gut of ruminants such as significantly reduce artificial fertiliser use , both cattle, and in their faeces .
    [Show full text]
  • State of Utah DIVISION of WASTE MANAGEMENT GARY R
    Department of Environmental Quality L. Scott Baird Executive Director State of Utah DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT GARY R. HERBERT AND RADIATION CONTROL Governor Ty L. Howard SPENCER J. COX Director Lieutenant Governor November 5, 2020 Cassady Kristensen Environmental Business Partner Rio Tinto Kennecott 4700 Daybreak Parkway South Jordan, UT 84009 RE: Kennecott Utah Copper Tailings Impoundment Refuse Class IIIb Landfill Permit Dear Ms. Kristensen: The Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control (Division) has completed its review of the application to permit the Rio Tinto Kennecott Utah Copper Tailings Impoundment Refuse Class IIIb Landfill located on the Rio Tinto Kennecott Tailings Impoundment facility in Salt Lake County, Utah. Enclosed with this letter is the approved Permit Number 1905 and applicable attachments from portions of the application. The Permit approval and expiration dates are shown on the permit cover page. Also, the Statement of Basis for this permit (DSHW-2020-014707) is included with the permit. If you have any questions, please call Doug Taylor at (801) 536-0240. Sincerely, Ty L. Howard, Director Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control (Over) DSHW-2020-014711 195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144880 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4880 Telephone (801) 536-0200 • Fax (801) 536-0222 • T.D.D. (801) 536-4284 www.deq.utah.gov Printed on 100% recycled paper TLH/DT/ar Enclosures: Permit (DSHW-2020-004084) Attachment #1 - Landfill Design (DSHW-2020-004510) Attachment #2 – Operation Plan (DSHW- 2020-004512) Attachment #3 – Closure and Post-Closure Plan (DSHW-2020-004514) Statement of Basis (DSHW-2020-014707) c: Gary Edwards, MS, Health Officer, Salt Lake County Health Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Blending Hydrogen Into Natural Gas Pipeline Networks: a Review of Key Issues
    Blending Hydrogen into Natural Gas Pipeline Networks: A Review of Key Issues M. W. Melaina, O. Antonia, and M. Penev NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Technical Report NREL/TP-5600-51995 March 2013 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Blending Hydrogen into Natural Gas Pipeline Networks: A Review of Key Issues M. W. Melaina, O. Antonia, and M. Penev Prepared under Task No. HT12.2010 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report 15013 Denver West Parkway NREL/TP-5600-51995 Golden, Colorado 80401 March 2013 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Atmospheric Gases Student Handout Atmospheric Gases
    Atmospheric Gases Student Handout Atmospheric Gases Driving Question: What is our atmosphere made of? In this activity you will: 1. Explore the variety and ratio of compounds and elements that make up the Earth’s atmosphere. 2. Understand volumetric measurements of gases in the atmosphere. 3. Visually depict the composition of the atmosphere. Background Information: Understanding Concentration Measurements In this activity, we will investigate the gas composition of our planet’s atmosphere. We use percentages to represent units of gas composition. A percent (%) is equivalent to 1 part out of 100 equal units. 1% = 1 part out of 100 For smaller concentrations scientists use parts per million (ppm) to represent concentrations of gases (or pollutants) in the atmosphere). One ppm is equivalent to 1 part out of 1,000,000 if the volume being measured is separated into 1,000,000 equal units. 1 ppm = 1 part out of 1,000,000 In this activity, you will use graph paper to represent the concentration of different gases in the atmosphere. Copyright © 2011 Environmental Literacy and Inquiry Working Group at Lehigh University Atmospheric Gases Student Handout 2 Here are some examples to help visualize parts per million: The common unit mg/liter is equal to ppm concentration Four drops of ink in a 55-gallon barrel of water would produce an "ink concentration" of 1 ppm. 1 12-oz can of soda pop in a 30-meter swimming pool 1 3-oz chocolate bar on a football field Atmospheric Composition Activity You will be creating a graphic model of the atmosphere composition using the Atmospheric Composition of Clean Dry Air activity sheet.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracer Applications of Noble Gas Radionuclides in the Geosciences
    To be published in Earth-Science Reviews Tracer Applications of Noble Gas Radionuclides in the Geosciences (August 20, 2013) Z.-T. Lua,b, P. Schlosserc,d, W.M. Smethie Jr.c, N.C. Sturchioe, T.P. Fischerf, B.M. Kennedyg, R. Purtscherth, J.P. Severinghausi, D.K. Solomonj, T. Tanhuak, R. Yokochie,l a Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois, USA b Department of Physics and Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA c Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York, USA d Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences and Department of Earth and Environmental Engineering, Columbia University, New York, USA e Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA f Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA g Center for Isotope Geochemistry, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, USA h Climate and Environmental Physics, Physics Institute, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland i Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, USA j Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA k GEOMAR Helmholtz Center for Ocean Research Kiel, Marine Biogeochemistry, Kiel, Germany l Department of Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA Abstract 81 85 39 Noble gas radionuclides, including Kr (t1/2 = 229,000 yr), Kr (t1/2 = 10.8 yr), and Ar (t1/2 = 269 yr), possess nearly ideal chemical and physical properties for studies of earth and environmental processes. Recent advances in Atom Trap Trace Analysis (ATTA), a laser-based atom counting method, have enabled routine measurements of the radiokrypton isotopes, as well as the demonstration of the ability to measure 39Ar in environmental samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Operation and Management Workbook
    MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILL OPERATION AND MANAGEMENT WORKBOOK Revised April 2018 Preface In many ways, constructing, operating and maintaining a municipal solid waste landfill is similar to constructing, operating, and maintaining a highway, dam, canal, bridge, or other engineered structure. The most important similarity is that landfills, like other engineered structures, must be constructed and operated in a manner that will provide safe, long-term, and reliable service to the communities they serve. Proper design, construction, operation, monitoring, closure and post-closure care are critical because after disposal the waste can be a threat to human health and the environment for decades to centuries. This workbook is intended to provide municipal landfill operators and managers in Wyoming with the fundamental knowledge and technical background necessary to ensure that landfills are operated efficiently, effectively, and in a manner that is protective of human health and the environment. This workbook contains information regarding basic construction and operation activities that are encountered on a routine basis at most landfills. The basic procedures and fundamental elements of landfill permitting, construction management, monitoring, closure, post-closure care, and financial assurance are also addressed. The workbook includes informative tips and information that landfill operators and managers can use to conserve landfill space, minimize the potential for pollution, reduce operating costs, and comply with applicable rules and regulations. In addition to this workbook, operators and managers need to become familiar with the Wyoming Solid Waste Rules and Regulations applicable to municipal solid waste. The DEQ also provides numerous guidelines that may help understand regulatory requirements in more detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Five Facts About Incineration Five Facts About Incineration
    Five facts about incineration Five facts about incineration Across the globe, cities are looking for ways to improve their municipal solid waste systems. In the search for services that are affordable, green and easy to implement, many cities are encouraged to turn to waste-to-energy (WtE) technologies, such as incineration.1 But, as found in WIEGO’s Technical Brief 11 (Waste Incineration and Informal Livelihoods: A Technical Guide on Waste-to-Energy Initiatives by Jeroen IJgosse), incineration is far from the perfect solution and, particularly in the Global South, can be less cost-effective, more complicated and can negatively impact the environment and informal waste workers’ livelihoods. Below, we have collected the top five issues highlighted in the study that show why this technology is a risky choice: 1. Incineration costs more than recycling. How incineration may be promoted: Incineration is a good economic decision because it reduces the costs associated with landfill operations while also creating energy that can be used by the community. The reality: • In 2016, the World Energy Council reported that, “energy generation from waste is a costly option, in comparison with other established power generation sources.” • Setting up an incineration project requires steep investment costs from the municipality. • For incineration projects to remain financially stable long-term, high fees are required, which place a burden on municipal finances and lead to sharp increases in user fees. • If incinerators are not able to collect enough burnable waste, they will burn other fuels (gas) instead. Contract obligations can force a municipality to make up the difference if an incinerator doesn’t burn enough to create the needed amount of energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Landfill Gas Investigations at Former Landfills and Disposal Sites
    Landfill Gas Investigations At Former Landfills and Disposal Sites California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery May 2014 S T A T E O F C ALIFORNIA Edmund G. Brown Jr. Governor Matt Rodriquez Secretary, California Environmental Protection Agency Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery CalRecycle Caroll Mortensen Director Public Affairs Office 1001 I Street (MS 22-B) P.O. Box 4025 Sacramento, CA 95812-4025 1-800-RECYCLE (California only) or (916) 341-6300 Publication # DRRR-2014-1516 To conserve resources and reduce waste, CalRecycle reports are produced in electronic format only. If printing copies of this document, please consider use of recycled paper containing 100 percent postconsumer fiber and, where possible, please print on both sides of the paper. Copyright © 2014 by the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). All rights reserved. This publication, or parts thereof, may not be reproduced in any form without permission. This report was prepared by staff of the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) to provide information or technical assistance. The statements and conclusions of this report are those of CalRecycle staff and not necessarily those of the department or the State of California. The state makes no warranty, expressed or implied, and assumes no liability for the information contained in the succeeding text. Any mention of commercial products or processes shall not be construed as an endorsement of such products or processes. The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) does not discriminate on the basis of disability in access to its programs. CalRecycle publications are available in accessible formats upon request by calling the Public Affairs Office at (916) 341-6300.
    [Show full text]
  • Dust Emissions from Landfill Due to Deposition of Industrial Waste: a Case Study in Malmberget Mine, Sweden
    Dust Emissions from Landfill due to Deposition of Industrial Waste: A Case Study in Malmberget Mine, Sweden Qi Jia, Yi Huang, Nadhir Al-Ansari and Sven Knutsson Civil, Mining and Nature Resources Engineering of Luleå University of Technology Abstract A great amount of industrial wastes are produced in Sweden every year. In 2008 there were 97.9 million tons of wasted generated, among which 93 million tons industrial waste were produced. 64.1% of industrial wastes were deposited in the landfill sites. Dust generation is one of the most important problems associated with industrial waste and landfills. The particulate dust emissions come from the industrial waste may contain heavy metal and produce environmental problems and potential health risks. Active and passive samplers, deposition pans are common equipment to collect dust samples. Real-time monitors use laser diffraction to recording continuous dust concentration. Dust emission from Malmberget mine in Sweden was analyzed as a case study. Dust was collected by NILU deposit gauge from 26 stations. Generally speaking the amount of dust fallout was decreasing with time because of implemented dust control methods. During the period August 2009 to August 2010, among all the measuring stations through the year, the maximum and the minimum value were 1284 g/100m2/30d and 9 g/100m2/30d. Two sources of dust generation were identified. The first was located close to the open pit, and the second near the current mining industrial center. The dust generation due to road construction was calculated. On the other hand dust generation was also closely related to weather conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Effects of Residence Near Hazardous Waste Landfill Sites: a Review of Epidemiologic Literature
    Health Effects of Residence Near Hazardous Waste Landfill Sites: A Review of Epidemiologic Literature Martine Vrijheid Environmental Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom This review evaluates current epidemiologic literature on health effects in relation to residence solvents, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), near landfill sites. Increases in risk of adverse health effects (low birth weight, birth defects, certain and heavy metals, have shown adverse effects types of cancers) have been reported near individual landfill sites and in some multisite studies, on human health or in animal experiments. and although biases and confounding factors cannot be excluded as explanations for these A discussion of findings from either epi­ findings, they may indicate real risks associated with residence near certain landfill sites. A general demiologic or toxicologic research on health weakness in the reviewed studies is the lack of direct exposure measurement. An increased effects related to specific chemicals is beyond prevalence of self-reported health symptoms such as fatigue, sleepiness, and headaches among the scope of this review. residents near waste sites has consistently been reported in more than 10 of the reviewed papers. It is difficult to conclude whether these symptoms are an effect of direct toxicologic action of Epidemiologic Studies on chemicals present in waste sites, an effect of stress and fears related to the waste site, or an Health Effects of Landfill Sites risks to effect of reporting bias. Although a substantial number of studies have been conducted, The majority of studies evaluating possible is insufficient exposure information and effects health from landfill sites are hard to quantify.
    [Show full text]
  • Muck: Causes and Corrective Actions1 Mark V
    FA200 A Beginner’s Guide to Water Management—Muck: Causes and Corrective Actions1 Mark V. Hoyer, Daniel E. Canfield, Jr. and Mark Brenner2 This publication was produced by: Florida LAKEWATCH 2017 UF/IFAS School of Forest Resources and Conservation / Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 7922 NW 71st Street Gainesville, Florida 32653-3071 Phone: 352/392-4817 FAX: 352/392-3672 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://lakewatch.ifas.ufl.edu Copies are available for download from the LAKEWATCH website: http://lakewatch.ifas.ufl.edu/data.shtml Muck from pond at Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Gainesville, FL. Credits: Mark Hoyer, UF/IFAS Introduction Informational Circular 112 Muck is both the popular and the scientific term for the material found on the bottom of many depressions that Florida LAKEWATCH have held water for any length of time. It is of great impor- tance to many recreational lake users because its presence UF/IFAS Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences can ruin their enjoyment of the water body. Its dark color School of Forest Resources and Conservation and “oozy” feel lead many people to believe muck could be Gainesville, Florida an indicator of a polluted system. January 2017 Another cause for people’s distaste for muck is the stink. Bacterial decomposition of the organic matter in muck 1. This document is FA200, one of a series of the School of Forest Resources and Conservation Program in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date February 2017. Visit the EDIS website at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. 2. Mark V. Hoyer, director, Florida LAKEWATCH, UF/IFAS Program in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences of the School of Forest Resources and Conservation; Daniel E.
    [Show full text]
  • Equation of State for Natural Gas Systems
    Equation of State for Natural Gas Systems. m A thesis submitted to the University of London for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy and for the Diploma of Imperial College by Jorge Francisco Estela-Uribe. Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemical Technology Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine. Prince Consort Road, SW7 2BY London, United Kingdom. March 1999. Acknowledgements. I acknowledge and thank the sponsorship I received from the following institutions: Fundacion para el Futuro de Colombia, Colfiituro; Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Seccional Cali; the Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principal of the Universities of the United Kingdom and Ruhrgas AG. Without their economic support my stay in London and the completion of this work would have been impossible. My greatest gratitude goes to my Supervisor, Dr Martin Trusler. His expert guidance and advice were always fundamental for the success of this research. He helped me with abundant patience and undying commitment and his optimism regarding the possibilities of the project was always inspirational for me. He also worked shoulder by shoulder with me on solving a good number of experimental problems, some of them were just cases of bad luck and for some prominent ones, I was the only one to blame. Others helped me willingly as well. My labmate, Dr Andres Estrada-Alexanders, was quite helpful in the beginning of my research, and has carried on being so. He not only did do well in his role as the senior student in the laboratory, but also became a good fnend of mine. Another good friend of mine, Dr Abdel Fenghour, has always been an endless source of help and information.
    [Show full text]