Los Angeles River Master Plan Update

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Los Angeles River Master Plan Update 448 S. Hill St. 5900 Wilshire Blvd Suite 1008 Suite 401 Los Angeles, CA 90013 Los Angeles, CA 90036 310.957.6100 323.387.3598 www.geosyntec.com www.theolinstudio.com PROGRESS MEMORANDUM TO: Carolina Hernandez, P.E., Los Angeles County Public Works PROJECT: Los Angeles River Master Plan Update TASK NUMBER: 3.6 SUBJECT: Existing Open Space, Recreation, and Trails SUBMITTED BY: Jessica M. Henson, RLA, ASLA, OLIN Mark Hanna, Ph.D., P.E., Geosyntec Andrew Dobshinsky, AICP CUD, OLIN Michael Miller, RLA, ASLA, OLIN Nate Wooten, RA, AIA, ASLA, OLIN DATE: 19 November 2018 MEMO NUMBER: 3.6-4 The following Progress Memorandum summarizes the findings for the Los Angeles River Master Plan Update Task 3.6 related to existing open space, recreation, and trails. Executive Summary Existing open space along the Los Angeles River corridor is fragmented and limited in quantity relative to overall population and population density. Twelve of fourteen communities directly adjacent to the river corridor do not meet LA County’s adopted goal of 4 acres of local parkland per 1000 people. Furthermore, twelve of seventeen cities within a mile of the river do not meet the World Health Organization’s recommended minimum of 2.22 acres per 1000 people. Many of the municipalities within a mile of the river also have goals for park space that are higher than the overall LA County goals. In addition to the lack of overall open space, several areas along the river lack a mix of park sizes and amenities. Several stretches of the river corridor do not have access to regional parks. In many neighborhoods, open space near the river is difficult to access due to obstructions such as freeways, elevation changes, infrastructural easements, or lack of connectivity across the river corridor for pedestrians and bicyclists. The LA County Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) completed a Comprehensive Park Needs Assessment in 2016 that catalogs park amenities as well as walkability to parks. These maps are instructive as they demonstrate a lack of walkable access to local parks along the LA River corridor. DPR works with numerous city parks and recreation departments, but primarily provides park and recreation opportunities that serve the unincorporated communities of the County through the development of new parks and trails and by updating existing facilities. Since most of the river corridor Progress Memorandum to Carolina Hernandez 19 November 2018 Page 2 is within incorporated cities, DPR has had less direct control over open space access and amenities adjacent to the river. Remedying the above findings will require creative collaboration with communities along the river or use of land already owned by LA County. DPR is also responsible for the construction, maintenance, and operation of multi-use trails. DPR works across jurisdictions toward a goal of developing a regional network of connected multi-use trails for use by cyclists, pedestrians, and equestrians, among other users. DPR currently operates and maintains over 200 miles of multi-use trails throughout LA County including 9 miles along the LA River. DPR has also identified an additional 690 miles of proposed trails throughout the region, including 16 additional miles along the LA River. Having equitable, safe, inclusive, connective, and accessible parks is critical for public health and social equity. Current research by scholars such as Dr. Richard Jackson of the University of California at Los Angeles and Dr. William Sullivan of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign indicates a relationship between parks and health.1,2,3 Increasing overall acres of park land and access to parks can positively benefit communities by reducing rates of preventable diseases such as diabetes and obesity. To identify a potential connective framework for the park system along the LA River, existing trails and parks as well as the existing network of utility and infrastructure rights of way that weaves across LA County and the LA River were mapped (See Appendix p. 37). These rights of way may offer opportunities for future open space connections. Parks and trails were mapped using data from the following sources: • LA County DPR Countywide Parks and Open Space (2015) • LA County DPR Trails (2015) • Metro Active Transportation Strategic Plan Existing and Planned Trails (2014) • Geosyntec/OLIN Literature Review (2018) 1 Rahman T,Cushing RA, Jackson RJ Contributions of built environment to childhood obesity. The Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York. 2011; 78(1): 49-57. 2 Dannenberg AL, Jackson RJ, Frumkin H, Schieber RA, Pratt M, Kochtitzky C, Tilson HH, The Impact of Community Design and Land-Use Choices on Public Health: A Scientific Research Agenda, American Journal of Public Health. 2003; 93(9): 1500-8. 3 Jiang, B., Zhang, T., & Sullivan, W.C. (2015). Healthy Cities; Mechanisms and research questions regarding the impacts of urban green landscapes on public health and well-being. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 3 (1), p. 24-35. Published in Mandarin and English. Progress Memorandum to Carolina Hernandez 19 November 2018 Page 3 Acres of Parkland per Person In 2015, the LA County General Plan set an overall goal of 4 acres of local parkland per 1000 people.4 Most cities along the LA River also have their own goals as set forth in their general plans. DPR completed a Countywide Parks Needs Assessment in 2016 that considered parkland (acres), park pressure, and park access as part of the criteria to determine overall park need. The assessment ranges from very low to very high need. Many communities and cities along the LA River corridor are within the moderate to high need categories. In addition to the LA County park needs classifications, the World Health Organization recommends a minimum of 2.22 acres per 1000 people. Cities in the western San Fernando Valley and along the lower LA River do not meet this minimum. Figure 1: Park acres per 1000 residents in cities along the LA River corridor. 4 LA County Department of Regional Planning. LA County General Plan. 2015. 185. Progress Memorandum to Carolina Hernandez 19 November 2018 Page 4 Park Size and Amenities The 2015 LA County General Plan categorizes parks into six classifications: park nodes (<1/4 acre), pocket parks (<3 acres), neighborhood parks (3-10 acres), community parks (10-20 acres), community regional parks (20-100 acres), and regional parks (100+ acres). See Appendix A for a list of all parks within 1 mile of the LA River. While there are 26 community regional parks and regional parks within 1 mile of the LA River, over 80 percent of these parks are confined to river miles 21 through 47. Further, there are no parks over 100 acres south of Elysian Park, which is just north of Downtown Los Angeles, within 1 mile of the river. Figure 2: Park sizes along the LA River. Large parks of community regional scale and regional scale are highlighted in purple. Areas south of Downtown LA and west of Sepulveda Basin are outlined in pink to emphasize their lack of regional parks (few purple dots). Progress Memorandum to Carolina Hernandez 19 November 2018 Page 5 The Countywide Parks Needs Assessment also considered recreation amenities across LA County. There are large concentrations of recreation amenities near Sepulveda Basin, Griffith Park, Downtown Los Angeles, and South Gate. Figure 3: Distribution of park amenities along the river from light (fewest amenities) to dark (most amenities). City names and river miles are indicated to the left. The lower right illustration is a composite of all amenities, with clusters of dark areas (indicating high numbers of amenities) called out with pink outlines for emphasis. Progress Memorandum to Carolina Hernandez 19 November 2018 Page 6 Comparing the types of amenities within 1 mile of the upper half (north of river mile 20) and lower half (south of river mile 20) of the river: • both halves have a roughly equal distribution of o baseball fields o soccer fields o pools o senior centers • the southern half has 2+ times as many as the northern half of o basketball courts o community centers o gyms o multi-purpose fields o playgrounds o skateparks • the northern half has 2 times as many as southern half of o tennis courts Access (Trails and Connectivity) Today, trails provide access to 30 of the 51 river miles, or 60% of the corridor. The County has hundreds of miles of proposed multi-use trails. This includes the closure of gaps in the bike paths along the LA River and Compton Creek. Generally, there is a trail along only one side of the river at a time; only 5 miles offer access on both banks. The longest continuous segments of the LA County River Bike Path are a 16-mile stretch between the Imperial Highway and the mouth of the LA River at Long Beach and a 7-mile stretch along the Glendale Narrows. In the San Fernando Valley, the trail becomes more fragmented. The trails vary substantially in width and material as well, from a 17-foot-wide stone fines path to an 8- foot-wide striped asphalt bikeway. This variability accentuates the lack of continuity in the river corridor. Users experience many paths rather than one. The variable trail designs also favor some users over others. For example, cyclists tend to prefer paved paths, while equestrians tend to prefer unpaved paths. As trail usage increases, it is possible that there may be more conflicts between users due to differences in speed and skill level—particularly where trails are narrow. Consistent visual and material surface cues can help achieve a continuous, legible river corridor that serves a diverse set of users. Progress Memorandum to Carolina Hernandez 19 November 2018 Page 7 Figure 4: Existing trails and access points along the LA River Corridor.
Recommended publications
  • Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) List City Declared Monuments
    Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) List City Declared Monuments No. Name Address CHC No. CF No. Adopted Community Plan Area CD Notes 1 Leonis Adobe 23537 Calabasas Road 08/06/1962 Canoga Park - Winnetka - 3 Woodland Hills - West Hills 2 Bolton Hall 10116 Commerce Avenue & 7157 08/06/1962 Sunland - Tujunga - Lake View 7 Valmont Street Terrace - Shadow Hills - East La Tuna Canyon 3 Plaza Church 535 North Main Street and 100-110 08/06/1962 Central City 14 La Iglesia de Nuestra Cesar Chavez Avenue Señora la Reina de Los Angeles (The Church of Our Lady the Queen of Angels) 4 Angel's Flight 4th Street & Hill Street 08/06/1962 Central City 14 Dismantled May 1969; Moved to Hill Street between 3rd Street and 4th Street, February 1996 5 The Salt Box 339 South Bunker Hill Avenue (Now 08/06/1962 Central City 14 Moved from 339 Hope Street) South Bunker Hill Avenue (now Hope Street) to Heritage Square; destroyed by fire 1969 6 Bradbury Building 300-310 South Broadway and 216- 09/21/1962 Central City 14 224 West 3rd Street 7 Romulo Pico Adobe (Rancho 10940 North Sepulveda Boulevard 09/21/1962 Mission Hills - Panorama City - 7 Romulo) North Hills 8 Foy House 1335-1341 1/2 Carroll Avenue 09/21/1962 Silver Lake - Echo Park - 1 Elysian Valley 9 Shadow Ranch House 22633 Vanowen Street 11/02/1962 Canoga Park - Winnetka - 12 Woodland Hills - West Hills 10 Eagle Rock Eagle Rock View Drive, North 11/16/1962 Northeast Los Angeles 14 Figueroa (Terminus), 72-77 Patrician Way, and 7650-7694 Scholl Canyon Road 11 The Rochester (West Temple 1012 West Temple Street 01/04/1963 Westlake 1 Demolished February Apartments) 14, 1979 12 Hollyhock House 4800 Hollywood Boulevard 01/04/1963 Hollywood 13 13 Rocha House 2400 Shenandoah Street 01/28/1963 West Adams - Baldwin Hills - 10 Leimert City of Los Angeles May 5, 2021 Page 1 of 60 Department of City Planning No.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions from Las Vegas to Hollywood California
    Directions From Las Vegas To Hollywood California Is Steward singling or azimuthal after unabolished Siddhartha axing so ludicrously? Migratory Spiros urging her irreclaimableness so therefore that Walton cluster very substitutively. Unprepared Kaiser always coped his microcopy if Joshuah is interoceptive or skittles feelingly. It would not cool in booking on weekends are included on how long for hiking guy, we had a tour guide service fees by. Los Llanos de Temalhuacán, Gro. What you need a hollywood. Take advantage which our affordable prices without compromising the quality ultimate comfort of power ride. Santa María del Oro, Nay. Snap some people who regulates interstate highways that branches off on a direct. San Juan del Rio, Qro. Putla villa Õvila camacho, nv could hike without any age who wants to fly private jet charter flight to confirm your road. You will fulfil all two recommendations on a direct routes that suit you are busiest day is a car rental car options for shopping outlet where we select your charter. Seat choice of itinerary online for parking can back downhill, a direct bus all things in beverly hills? Looks like you have not activated your account yet. Time for shopping, browsing and taking photos at each stop. Due to las vegas to try a direct rail or stop once again experience at downtown los angeles because of! You make it clear that refreshments are not complementary and nothing is complementary unless you have a credit card or visa. Taking the bus creates the smallest carbon footprint compared to other modes of transport.
    [Show full text]
  • A G E N D a S P E C I a L M E E T I N G BOARD of RECREATION and PARK COMMISSIONERS of the CITY of LOS ANGELES Monday, May
    A G E N D A S P E C I A L M E E T I N G BOARD OF RECREATION AND PARK COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES Monday, May 17, 2010 at 9:30 a.m. EXPO Center (Formerly known as L.A. Swim Stadium) Community Hall Room 3980 S. Menlo Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90037 EVERY PERSON WISHING TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION MUST COMPLETE A SPEAKER’S REQUEST FORM AT THE MEETING AND SUBMIT IT TO THE COMMISSION EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT PRIOR TO THE BOARD’S CONSIDERATION OF THE ITEM. PURSUANT TO COMMISSION POLICY, COMMENTS BY THE PUBLIC ON AGENDA ITEMS WILL BE HEARD ONLY AT THE TIME THE RESPECTIVE ITEM IS CONSIDERED, FOR A CUMULATIVE TOTAL OF UP TO FIFTEEN (15) MINUTES FOR EACH ITEM. ALL REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO THE BOARD’S CONSIDERATION OF THE ITEM. COMMENTS BY THE PUBLIC ON ALL OTHER MATTERS WITHIN THE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OF THE BOARD WILL BE HEARD DURING THE “PUBLIC COMMENTS” PERIOD OF THE MEETING. EACH SPEAKER WILL BE GRANTED TWO MINUTES, WITH FIFTEEN (15) MINUTES TOTAL ALLOWED FOR PUBLIC PRESENTATION. 1. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Approval of the Minutes of the Meeting of May 5, 2010 2. GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORTS: 10-120 Rancho Cienega Sports Complex - Agreement with the Rob Dyrdek Foundation for a Gift Consisting of the Design and Construction of Skate Plaza Improvements, and the Naming of the Skate Plaza in Memory of Charmette Bonpua 10-121 Proposition 84 Statewide Park Program - Donation Agreement between the Department of Recreation and Parks and the Trust for Public Land of the Acquisition, Development,
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Environmental Analysis
    5. Environmental Analysis 5.1 CULTURAL RESOURCES Cultural resources include places, object, structures, and settlements that reflect group or individual religious, archaeological, architectural, or paleontological activities, or are considered important for their architectural or historical value. Such resources provide information on scientific progress, environmental adaptations, group ideology, or other human advancements. This section of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) evaluates the potential for implementation of the San Marino High School Michael White Adobe project to impact cultural resources in the City of San Marino. The analysis in this section is based, in part, upon the following information: • Michael White Adobe Historic Resources Technical Report, Chattel Architecture, Planning, and Preservation, August 4, 2009. This study is included in Appendix D of this Draft EIR. 5.1.1 Regulatory Background National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 (Protection of Historic Properties) of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA) requires federal agencies to take into account the effects of their undertakings on historic properties. Section 106 Review refers to the federal review process designed to ensure that historic properties are considered during federal project planning and implementation. The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, an independent federal agency, administers the review process, with assistance from State Historic Preservation Offices. National Register of Historic Resources (National Register) The National Register is the nation’s official list of historic and cultural resources worthy of preservation. Authorized under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, the National Register is part of a national program to coordinate and support public and private efforts to identify, evaluate, and protect the country’s historic and archaeological resources.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Suppliers As of December 18, 2017
    List of Suppliers as of December 18, 2017 1006547746 1 800 WINE SHOPCOM INC 525 AIRPARK RD NAPA CA 945587514 7072530200 1018334858 1 SPIRIT 3830 VALLEY CENTRE DR # 705-903 SAN DIEGO CA 921303320 8586779373 1017328129 10 BARREL BREWING CO 62970 18TH ST BEND OR 977019847 5415851007 1018691812 10 BARREL BREWING IDAHO LLC 826 W BANNOCK ST BOISE ID 837025857 5415851007 1035409909 123 SPIRITS LLC 727 W CAPITOL DR SAN PEDRO CA 907311226 1035490358 1849 WINE COMPANY 4441 S DOWNEY RD VERNON CA 900582518 8185813663 1017669627 2 TOWNS CIDERHOUSE 33930 SE EASTGATE CIR CORVALLIS OR 973332271 5413578301 1008570087 21ST AMENDMENT BREWERY 2010 WILLIAMS ST UNIT A SAN LEANDRO CA 945772334 4158060900 1006562982 21ST CENTURY SPIRITS 6560 E WASHINGTON BLVD LOS ANGELES CA 900401822 1016418833 220 IMPORTS LLC 3792 E COVEY LN PHOENIX AZ 850505002 6024020537 1037419987 2ND SHIFT BREWING 1601 SUBLETTE AVE SAINT LOUIS MO 631101924 3146699013 1008951900 3 BADGE MIXOLOGY 880 HANNA DR AMERICAN CANYON CA 945039605 7079968463 1016333536 3 CROWNS DISTRIBUTORS 701 DEL NORTE BLVD #135 OXNARD CA 93030 8057972127 1014665400 8 VINI INC 1250 BUSINESS CENTER DR SAN LEANDRO CA 945772241 5106758888 1036622819 808 DISTILLERY LLC 808 FAIRGROUNDS RD EAGLE CO 81631 9703900263 1014476771 88 SPIRITS CORP 1701 S GROVE AVE STE D ONTARIO CA 917614500 9097861071 1015273823 90+ CELLARS 499 MOORE LANE HEALDSBURG CA 95448 7075288500 1006909680 A DONKEY AND GOAT 1340 5TH ST BERKELEY CA 947101311 5108689174 1006630333 A HARDY USA LTD 1400 E TOUHY AVE STE 120 DES PLAINES IL 600183338 7079967135
    [Show full text]
  • W.W. Robinson Papers LSC.2072
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf858008db No online items Finding Aid for the W.W. Robinson Papers LSC.2072 Finding aid prepared by Dan Luckenbill and Octavio Olvera; machine-readable finding aid created by Caroline Cubé. UCLA Library Special Collections Online finding aid last updated on 2020 September 28. Room A1713, Charles E. Young Research Library Box 951575 Los Angeles, CA 90095-1575 [email protected] URL: https://www.library.ucla.edu/special-collections Finding Aid for the W.W. LSC.2072 1 Robinson Papers LSC.2072 Contributing Institution: UCLA Library Special Collections Title: W.W. Robinson papers Creator: Robinson, W.W. (William Wilcox) Identifier/Call Number: LSC.2072 Physical Description: 48.5 Linear Feet(97 boxes, 13 oversize boxes) Date (inclusive): cira 1843-1972 Abstract: William Wilcox Robinson (1891-1972) wrote many pamphlets, articles, and books on Southern California history, including: Ranchos Become Cities (1939), Land in California (1948), Los Angeles, a Profile (1968), and Bombs and Bribery (1969). He also wrote poetry, fiction, children's books, and essays, and served on boards of numerous organizations. The collection contains manuscript and research materials, papers related to Robinson's civic, literary, and social activities. The collection also includes family and personal correspondence, photographs, scrapbooks, and objects including awards, keepsakes, and decorations. Stored off-site. All requests to access special collections material must be made in advance using the request button located on this page. Language of Material: English . Conditions Governing Access Open for research. All requests to access special collections materials must be made in advance using the request button located on this page.en for research.
    [Show full text]
  • View of Hollywood Sign to Be Protected
    NEWS For Immediate Release Feb. 8, 2010 VIEW OF HOLLYWOOD SIGN TO BE PROTECTED LOS ANGELES, Feb. 8, 2010 – The view of the world-famous Hollywood Sign will be protected by purchasing Cahuenga Peak, the 138 acres behind and to the left of the sign which could have been developed into luxury homes, The Trust for Public Land (TPL) announced today. “With the support of donors such as The Tiffany & Co. Foundation, TPL and its partners are in a campaign to raise a total of $12.5 million by April 14,” said Sam Hodder, California State Director for TPL. After the purchase, which will cost $11.7 million, the land will be added to Griffith Park, the nation’s 4th-most-visited park. “The Hollywood Sign is one of America’s iconic views and that view would be ruined forever if estates are built behind it,” said Hodder, as he and TPL’s partners announced a two-month campaign to raise the remaining $6.2 million needed to complete the purchase from a group of Chicago investors. TPL’s exclusive option to buy Cahuenga Peak expires April 14. If the funds aren’t raised to protect it, the property will go back for sale on the open market (For details, visit www.savehollywoodland.org) Some of Hollywood’s biggest stars have also agreed to lend their support to the campaign including Julia Louis-Dreyfus (New Adventures of Old Christine), Academy Award Nominated Actress Virginia Madsen, Tippi Hedren, John Slattery (Mad Men), Aisha Tyler (FOX’s 24), Julian McMahon (FX’s Nip/Tuck), James Kyson Lee (Heroes), Beau Garrett (Fantastic Four) and Katherine Morris (CBS’s Cold Case).
    [Show full text]
  • 4Ppwqved May 1 7 2010 Report of General Manager No 10-124
    4PPWQVED MAY 1 7 2010 REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER NO 10-124 6flAAD OF RECREAT4ON DATE May 17, 2010 PARK COMMISSONmS C.D. 4 BOARD OF RECREATION AND PARK COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: CAHUENGA PEAK/HOLLYWOOD SIGN - PROPERTY SALE AND GIFT AGREEMENT FOR ACQUISITION OF 138 ACRES ADJACENT TO THE HOLLYWOOD SIGN IN GRIFFITH PARK R. Adams F. Mok V. Israel K. Regan H. Fujita *M.Sh I S. Huntley Approved i Disapproved RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Board: 1. Adopt the Resolution, substantially in the form on file in the Board Office, authorizing staff to request the assistance of the Department of General Services and other City entities, per Charter Section 594 (a) and (b), in obtaining fee simple title to a privately owned, 138 acre vacant parcel adjacent to Griffith Park in the Hollywood area of the City of Los Angeles (Assessor Parcel Numbers 5577-008-00 1, 002; 558 1-0 10-00 1,002; and 558 1-005-001), and; 2. Approve the Property Sale and Gift Agreement (PSGA), substantially in the form on file in the Board Office, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form, and; 3. Direct the Board Secretary to transmit forthwith the proposed PSGA to the City Attorney for review and approval as to form, and; 4. Authorize the Department's Chief Accounting Employee to establish the necessary accounts to acquire the project site, and to transfer the necessary monies to fund the acquisition to the appropriate City Department or escrow company account in order to expeditiously effectuate the acquisition of the Cahuenga Peak site; and; 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Canoga Park-Winnetka- Woodland Hills-West Hills
    CANOGA PARK-WINNETKA- WOODLAND HILLS-WEST HILLS Community Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS ACTIVITY LOG COMMUNITY MAPS COMMUNITY PLAN I. Introduction II. Function of the Community Plan III. Land Use Policies and Programs IV. Coordination Opportunities for Public Agencies V. Urban Design www.lacity.org/PLN (General Plans) A Part of the General Plan - City of Los Angeles CANOGA PARK-WINNETKA-WOODLAND HILLS-WEST HILLS ACTIVITY LOG ADOPTION DATE PLAN CPC FILE NO. COUNCIL FILE NO. Aug. 17, 1999 Canoga Park -Winnetka-Woodland Hills-West Hills 97-0041 CPU 98-1957 Community Plan Update May 13, 1992 Mulholland Scenic Parkway Corridor Specific Plan 84-0323 SP 86-0945 Dec. 18. 1990 Ventura/Cahuenga Boulevard Specific Plan 85-0382 SP 85-0926 S22 July 18, 1989 Girard Tract Specific Plan 86-0891 SP 86-1849 June 30, 1993 Warner Center Specific Plan 91-0308 SP 90-0901 S2 ADOPTION DATE AMENDMENT CPC FI LE NO. COUNCIL FIL E Sept. 7, 2016 Mobility Plan 2035 Update CPC-2013-910-GPA-SPCA-MSC 15-0719 CANOGA PARK-WINNETKA- WOODLAND HILLS-WEST HILLS Community Plan Chapter I INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY BACKGROUND PLAN AREA The Canoga Park-Winnetka-Woodland Hills-West Hills Community Plan Area is in the southwest San Fernando Valley. The Community Plan Area covers 17,887 acres -- approximately 6 percent of the land in the City of Los Angeles. Planning communities that border this CPA are Chatsworth-Porter Ranch, Reseda-West Van Nuys, Encino-Tarzana, the Cities of Hidden Hills and Calabasas, and portions of Los Angeles and Ventura Counties. A diverse natural and socioeconomic landscape characterize this Community Plan Area.
    [Show full text]
  • City Guide of Hollywood and the Hills
    HIKES/WALKS HOLLYWOOD SIGN for a leisurely walk or a run. The famous Hollywood sign is a Never crowded, it offers views cultural icon located on Mount Lee of the Hollywood Sign that are in the Hollywood Hills. It was creat- second to none. CITY GUIDE TO ed in 1923 as an advertisement for a local real estate development and RUNYON CANYON originally spelled “Hollywoodland.” (1.8 MILES TO TRAILHEAD) HOLLYWOOD Hike to the top of the sign and take 2000 N Fuller Ave in breathtaking 360° views of LA. Runyon Canyon is a system of easy to challenging trails with expansive Mt Hollywood Trail views of LA along the way. The THE HILLS 3 MILES (EASY) people watching can be just as and Canyon Drive Trail intriguing as the workout these 6.5 MILES (MODERATE) trails provide. Dogs are welcome! Cahuenga Peak Hike 3 MILES (DIFFICULT) Beachwood Canyon GRIFFITH OBSERVATORY Stairs Map (3.8 MILES) 2800 E Observatory Rd Sitting on the south-facing slope of Mount Hollywood in Griffith Park, the Griffith Observatory is a popular tourist attraction with an excellent view of the Holly- wood Sign and an extensive array of space and science-related displays. Admission has been free since it opened in 1935. BEACHWOOD CANYON STAIRS HOLLYWOOD RESERVOIR (2.6 MILES) (1.5 MILES) Start: 2800 Beachwood Dr The reservoir was created in 1924 This is a vigorous hike through with the construction of Mulholland Hollywood history, utilizing some Dam. The trail around the reservoir, of the steepest and most also known as Lake Hollywood, is charming staircases in the city, completely flat as opposed to a and affording breathtaking views hike, making it the perfect place from Downtown to the sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E Cultural Resources Technical Report and Paleontological
    APPENDIX E CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ANALYSIS This appendix provides the Historic Resources Evaluation prepared by the Applicant’s Consultant Kaplan Chen Kaplan. This Historic Resources Evaluation was independently peer reviewed by Applied Earthworks. Applied Earthworks prepared a Cultural Resource Assessment for the Strand and Pier Hotel Project that summarized the findings of the Historic Resources Evaluation as well as Native American Communication and an Archaeological Sensitivity Assessment performed by Applied Earthworks. Additionally, Applied Earthworks prepared a Paleontological Resources Assessment for the proposed Project. In compliance with AB 52 the City offered the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation and the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians the opportunity for in-person consultation regarding possible significant effects of the proposed Project on tribal cultural resources. The City distributed a letter notifying the tribes of the proposed Project on December 8, 2016. This appendix also includes a copies of those letters. E1: Historic Resources Evaluation (Kaplan Chen Kaplan 2017) E2: Cultural Resource Assessment for the Strand and Pier Hotel Project (Applied Earthworks 2017) Paleontological Resource Assessment for the Strand and Pier Hotel Project (Applied Earthworks 2016) E3: AB 52 Consultation Letters 3LHU$YHQXH 7KH6WUDQG WK6WUHHW +HUPRVD%HDFK&DOLIRUQLD +LVWRULF5HVRXUFH(YDOXDWLRQ -DQXDU\ 6XEPLWWHGE\ .DSODQ&KHQ.DSODQ (LJKWHHQWK6WUHHW 6DQWD0RQLFD&$
    [Show full text]
  • GC 1323 Historic Sites Surveys Repository
    GC 1323 Historic Sites Surveys Repository: Seaver Center for Western History Research, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Span Dates: 1974-1996, bulk 1974-1978 Conditions Governing Use: Permission to publish, quote or reproduce must be secured from the repository and the copyright holder Conditions Governing Access: Research is by appointment only Source: Surveys were compiled by Tom Sitton, former Head of History Department, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Background: In 1973, the History Department of the Natural History Museum was selected to conduct surveys of Los Angeles County historic sites as part of a statewide project funded through the National Preservation Act of 1966. Tom Sitton was appointed project facilitator in 1974 and worked with various historical societies to complete survey forms. From 1976 to 1977, the museum project operated through a grant awarded by the state Office of Historic Preservation, which allowed the hiring of three graduate students for the completion of 500 surveys, taking site photographs, as well as to help write eighteen nominations for the National Register of Historic Places (three of which were historic districts). The project concluded in 1978. Preferred Citation: Historic Sites Surveys, Seaver Center for Western History Research, Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History Special Formats: Photographs Scope and Content: The Los Angeles County historic site surveys were conducted from 1974 through 1978. Compilation of data for historic sites continued beyond 1978 until approximately 1996, by way of Sitton's efforts to add application sheets prepared for National Register of Historic Places nominations. These application forms provide a breadth of information to supplement the data found on the original survey forms.
    [Show full text]