DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents D. Visual Qualities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents D. Visual Qualities Table of Contents D. Visual Qualities 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1039 2. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ................................................................................... 1040 a. Existing Regulatory Framework .......................................................................... 1040 (1) City of Los Angeles General Plan Framework ............................................ 1040 (2) Sherman Oaks – Studio City – Toluca Lake – Cahuenga Pass Community Plan ......................................................................................... 1041 b. Existing Visual Character of the Project Site ....................................................... 1041 (1) North Back Lot Visual Quality Area ............................................................. 1042 (2) South Back Lot Visual Quality Area ............................................................ 1042 (3) Entertainment Visual Quality Area .............................................................. 1043 (4) Lankershim Frontage Visual Quality Area ................................................... 1043 (5) Studio Visual Quality Area .......................................................................... 1044 c. Existing Views - Areas Surrounding the Project Site ........................................... 1044 d. Existing Visual Character of Project Site and Views from Off-Site Geographic Areas .................................................................................................................. 1044 (1) Barham Boulevard Corridor - South ............................................................ 1046 (a) Visual Character ................................................................................... 1046 (b) Views of Valued Visual Resources ....................................................... 1048 (2) Barham Boulevard Corridor – North ............................................................ 1048 (a) Visual Character ................................................................................... 1049 (b) Views of Valued Visual Resources ....................................................... 1050 (3) Forest Lawn Drive - West ............................................................................ 1050 (a) Visual Character ................................................................................... 1050 (b) Views of Valued Visual Resources ....................................................... 1051 (4) Oakwood Garden Apartments ..................................................................... 1051 (a) Visual Character ................................................................................... 1051 (b) Views of Valued Visual Resources ....................................................... 1052 (5) Hollywood Manor ........................................................................................ 1052 (a) Visual Character ................................................................................... 1053 (b) Views of Valued Visual Resources ....................................................... 1054 (6) Hollywood Knolls ......................................................................................... 1055 (a) Visual Character ................................................................................... 1055 (b) Views of Valued Visual Resources ....................................................... 1056 City of Los Angeles NBC Universal Evolution Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report November 2010 Page i WORKING DRAFT - Not for Public Review Table of Contents (7) Mulholland Ridge ........................................................................................ 1056 (a) Visual Character ................................................................................... 1056 (b) Views of Valued Visual Resources ....................................................... 1057 (8) Cahuenga Pass East .................................................................................. 1057 (a) Visual Character ................................................................................... 1057 (b) Views of Valued Visual Resources ....................................................... 1059 (9) Cahuenga Pass West ................................................................................. 1059 (a) Visual Character ................................................................................... 1059 (b) Views of Valued Visual Resources ....................................................... 1060 (10) Universal City Metro Red Line Station & Campo de Cahuenga ................ 1061 (a) Visual Character ................................................................................... 1061 (b) Views of Valued Visual Resources ....................................................... 1061 (11) Weddington Park (South) .......................................................................... 1061 (a) Visual Character ................................................................................... 1061 (b) Views of Valued Visual Resources ....................................................... 1062 (12) City View Lofts/Island ................................................................................ 1063 (a) Visual Character ................................................................................... 1063 (b) Views of Valued Visual Resources ....................................................... 1063 (13) Toluca Estates .......................................................................................... 1064 (a) Visual Character ................................................................................... 1064 (b) Views of Valued Visual Resources ....................................................... 1064 (14) Toluca Lake .............................................................................................. 1064 (a) Visual Character ................................................................................... 1064 (b) Views of Valued Visual Resources ....................................................... 1065 (15) Lakeside Golf Club .................................................................................... 1065 (a) Visual Character ................................................................................... 1065 (b) Views of Valued Visual Resources ....................................................... 1066 3. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS .................................................................................. 1066 a. Methodology ........................................................................................................ 1066 (1) Aesthetics (Visual Character) ...................................................................... 1066 (2) Views .......................................................................................................... 1069 b. Thresholds of Significance .................................................................................. 1070 (1) Aesthetics (Visual Character) ...................................................................... 1070 (2) Views .......................................................................................................... 1071 c. Project Design Features ...................................................................................... 1071 (1) Specific Plans ............................................................................................. 1071 d. Analysis of Project Impacts ................................................................................. 1072 (1) Barham Boulevard Corridor - South ............................................................ 1073 (a) Visual Character ................................................................................... 1073 (b) Views of Valued Visual Resources ....................................................... 1075 (2) Barham Boulevard Corridor - North ............................................................. 1076 City of Los Angeles NBC Universal Evolution Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report November 2010 Page ii WORKING DRAFT - Not for Public Review Table of Contents (a) Visual Character ................................................................................... 1076 (b) Views of Valued Visual Resources ....................................................... 1078 (3) Forest Lawn Drive - West ............................................................................ 1078 (a) Visual Character ................................................................................... 1078 (b) Views of Valued Visual Resources ....................................................... 1079 (4) Oakwood Garden Apartments ..................................................................... 1080 (a) Visual Character ................................................................................... 1080 (b) Views of Valued Visual Resources ....................................................... 1080 (5) Hollywood Manor ........................................................................................ 1081 (a) Visual Character ................................................................................... 1081 (b) Views of Valued Visual Resources ....................................................... 1084 (6) Hollywood Knolls ......................................................................................... 1085 (a) Visual Character ..................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Directions from Las Vegas to Hollywood California
    Directions From Las Vegas To Hollywood California Is Steward singling or azimuthal after unabolished Siddhartha axing so ludicrously? Migratory Spiros urging her irreclaimableness so therefore that Walton cluster very substitutively. Unprepared Kaiser always coped his microcopy if Joshuah is interoceptive or skittles feelingly. It would not cool in booking on weekends are included on how long for hiking guy, we had a tour guide service fees by. Los Llanos de Temalhuacán, Gro. What you need a hollywood. Take advantage which our affordable prices without compromising the quality ultimate comfort of power ride. Santa María del Oro, Nay. Snap some people who regulates interstate highways that branches off on a direct. San Juan del Rio, Qro. Putla villa Õvila camacho, nv could hike without any age who wants to fly private jet charter flight to confirm your road. You will fulfil all two recommendations on a direct routes that suit you are busiest day is a car rental car options for shopping outlet where we select your charter. Seat choice of itinerary online for parking can back downhill, a direct bus all things in beverly hills? Looks like you have not activated your account yet. Time for shopping, browsing and taking photos at each stop. Due to las vegas to try a direct rail or stop once again experience at downtown los angeles because of! You make it clear that refreshments are not complementary and nothing is complementary unless you have a credit card or visa. Taking the bus creates the smallest carbon footprint compared to other modes of transport.
    [Show full text]
  • A G E N D a S P E C I a L M E E T I N G BOARD of RECREATION and PARK COMMISSIONERS of the CITY of LOS ANGELES Monday, May
    A G E N D A S P E C I A L M E E T I N G BOARD OF RECREATION AND PARK COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES Monday, May 17, 2010 at 9:30 a.m. EXPO Center (Formerly known as L.A. Swim Stadium) Community Hall Room 3980 S. Menlo Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90037 EVERY PERSON WISHING TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION MUST COMPLETE A SPEAKER’S REQUEST FORM AT THE MEETING AND SUBMIT IT TO THE COMMISSION EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT PRIOR TO THE BOARD’S CONSIDERATION OF THE ITEM. PURSUANT TO COMMISSION POLICY, COMMENTS BY THE PUBLIC ON AGENDA ITEMS WILL BE HEARD ONLY AT THE TIME THE RESPECTIVE ITEM IS CONSIDERED, FOR A CUMULATIVE TOTAL OF UP TO FIFTEEN (15) MINUTES FOR EACH ITEM. ALL REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO THE BOARD’S CONSIDERATION OF THE ITEM. COMMENTS BY THE PUBLIC ON ALL OTHER MATTERS WITHIN THE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OF THE BOARD WILL BE HEARD DURING THE “PUBLIC COMMENTS” PERIOD OF THE MEETING. EACH SPEAKER WILL BE GRANTED TWO MINUTES, WITH FIFTEEN (15) MINUTES TOTAL ALLOWED FOR PUBLIC PRESENTATION. 1. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Approval of the Minutes of the Meeting of May 5, 2010 2. GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORTS: 10-120 Rancho Cienega Sports Complex - Agreement with the Rob Dyrdek Foundation for a Gift Consisting of the Design and Construction of Skate Plaza Improvements, and the Naming of the Skate Plaza in Memory of Charmette Bonpua 10-121 Proposition 84 Statewide Park Program - Donation Agreement between the Department of Recreation and Parks and the Trust for Public Land of the Acquisition, Development,
    [Show full text]
  • View of Hollywood Sign to Be Protected
    NEWS For Immediate Release Feb. 8, 2010 VIEW OF HOLLYWOOD SIGN TO BE PROTECTED LOS ANGELES, Feb. 8, 2010 – The view of the world-famous Hollywood Sign will be protected by purchasing Cahuenga Peak, the 138 acres behind and to the left of the sign which could have been developed into luxury homes, The Trust for Public Land (TPL) announced today. “With the support of donors such as The Tiffany & Co. Foundation, TPL and its partners are in a campaign to raise a total of $12.5 million by April 14,” said Sam Hodder, California State Director for TPL. After the purchase, which will cost $11.7 million, the land will be added to Griffith Park, the nation’s 4th-most-visited park. “The Hollywood Sign is one of America’s iconic views and that view would be ruined forever if estates are built behind it,” said Hodder, as he and TPL’s partners announced a two-month campaign to raise the remaining $6.2 million needed to complete the purchase from a group of Chicago investors. TPL’s exclusive option to buy Cahuenga Peak expires April 14. If the funds aren’t raised to protect it, the property will go back for sale on the open market (For details, visit www.savehollywoodland.org) Some of Hollywood’s biggest stars have also agreed to lend their support to the campaign including Julia Louis-Dreyfus (New Adventures of Old Christine), Academy Award Nominated Actress Virginia Madsen, Tippi Hedren, John Slattery (Mad Men), Aisha Tyler (FOX’s 24), Julian McMahon (FX’s Nip/Tuck), James Kyson Lee (Heroes), Beau Garrett (Fantastic Four) and Katherine Morris (CBS’s Cold Case).
    [Show full text]
  • 4Ppwqved May 1 7 2010 Report of General Manager No 10-124
    4PPWQVED MAY 1 7 2010 REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER NO 10-124 6flAAD OF RECREAT4ON DATE May 17, 2010 PARK COMMISSONmS C.D. 4 BOARD OF RECREATION AND PARK COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: CAHUENGA PEAK/HOLLYWOOD SIGN - PROPERTY SALE AND GIFT AGREEMENT FOR ACQUISITION OF 138 ACRES ADJACENT TO THE HOLLYWOOD SIGN IN GRIFFITH PARK R. Adams F. Mok V. Israel K. Regan H. Fujita *M.Sh I S. Huntley Approved i Disapproved RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Board: 1. Adopt the Resolution, substantially in the form on file in the Board Office, authorizing staff to request the assistance of the Department of General Services and other City entities, per Charter Section 594 (a) and (b), in obtaining fee simple title to a privately owned, 138 acre vacant parcel adjacent to Griffith Park in the Hollywood area of the City of Los Angeles (Assessor Parcel Numbers 5577-008-00 1, 002; 558 1-0 10-00 1,002; and 558 1-005-001), and; 2. Approve the Property Sale and Gift Agreement (PSGA), substantially in the form on file in the Board Office, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form, and; 3. Direct the Board Secretary to transmit forthwith the proposed PSGA to the City Attorney for review and approval as to form, and; 4. Authorize the Department's Chief Accounting Employee to establish the necessary accounts to acquire the project site, and to transfer the necessary monies to fund the acquisition to the appropriate City Department or escrow company account in order to expeditiously effectuate the acquisition of the Cahuenga Peak site; and; 5.
    [Show full text]
  • City Guide of Hollywood and the Hills
    HIKES/WALKS HOLLYWOOD SIGN for a leisurely walk or a run. The famous Hollywood sign is a Never crowded, it offers views cultural icon located on Mount Lee of the Hollywood Sign that are in the Hollywood Hills. It was creat- second to none. CITY GUIDE TO ed in 1923 as an advertisement for a local real estate development and RUNYON CANYON originally spelled “Hollywoodland.” (1.8 MILES TO TRAILHEAD) HOLLYWOOD Hike to the top of the sign and take 2000 N Fuller Ave in breathtaking 360° views of LA. Runyon Canyon is a system of easy to challenging trails with expansive Mt Hollywood Trail views of LA along the way. The THE HILLS 3 MILES (EASY) people watching can be just as and Canyon Drive Trail intriguing as the workout these 6.5 MILES (MODERATE) trails provide. Dogs are welcome! Cahuenga Peak Hike 3 MILES (DIFFICULT) Beachwood Canyon GRIFFITH OBSERVATORY Stairs Map (3.8 MILES) 2800 E Observatory Rd Sitting on the south-facing slope of Mount Hollywood in Griffith Park, the Griffith Observatory is a popular tourist attraction with an excellent view of the Holly- wood Sign and an extensive array of space and science-related displays. Admission has been free since it opened in 1935. BEACHWOOD CANYON STAIRS HOLLYWOOD RESERVOIR (2.6 MILES) (1.5 MILES) Start: 2800 Beachwood Dr The reservoir was created in 1924 This is a vigorous hike through with the construction of Mulholland Hollywood history, utilizing some Dam. The trail around the reservoir, of the steepest and most also known as Lake Hollywood, is charming staircases in the city, completely flat as opposed to a and affording breathtaking views hike, making it the perfect place from Downtown to the sea.
    [Show full text]
  • GRIFFITH PARK PERFORMING ARTS CENTER Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration
    GRIFFITH PARK PERFORMING ARTS CENTER Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Prepared for December 2013 City of Los Angeles Department of Recreation and Parks GRIFFITH PARK PERFORMING ARTS CENTER Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Prepared for December 2013 City of Los Angeles Department of Recreation and Parks 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Oakland Orlando Palm Springs Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Santa Cruz Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills 130367.02 TABLE OF CONTENTS Griffith Park Performing Arts Center Project Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration Page Chapter 1: Project Description ......................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Project Location and Setting ....................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Project Description ...................................................................................................................... 1-6 1.4 Project Objectives ..................................................................................................................... 1-13 1.5 Construction Program ............................................................................................................... 1-13 1.6 Required
    [Show full text]
  • Public Geology at Griffith Park in Los Angeles: a Sample Teachers’ Guide
    Public Geology at Griffith Park in Los Angeles: A Sample Teachers’ Guide Daniel S Helman California State University, Long Beach, USA While in graduate school the author discovered Griffith Park and its examples of local geology (Figures 1 and 2). The structural geology is very clear. From the location of the faulting, you look across the basin and see notches in the local mountains where the faults have dictated the ends of the nearby ranges. These subtle, slow faults control the entire region. In one location several faults converge at a single point. It is not breathtaking – but to realize that one can see the underlying structure in such a big edifice as a mountain does make a mental impact. There is math behind the valley’s limbs. That is what a geologist sees: a puzzle of subtle connections, coaxed into a story which has a past and a future. That story is what your students will see when you take them to a public park or focused place with good landform relations and rock exposures. They deserve this process, and they need it in order to come to terms with today’s changing environment. These connections will help them contribute to a global future. Griffith Park in Los Angeles, California is not the only urban park which can be used thus. A list of “Urban Parks by Size” on a page of Wikipedia as of this writing has 202 entries, and these range in size from 60,070 to 334 acres (or 24,310 to 135 hectares).i Many of them will provide the same kind of opportunity as Griffith Park - with no bags to pack, no tents to set up, and both water and safety well within reach.
    [Show full text]
  • A Folkloric Investigation of the Los Angeles Wisdom Tree
    ! CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY,! NORTHRIDGE ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tangible Communitas: A Folkloric Investigation! of the Los Angeles Wisdom Tree ! ! ! ! ! A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology ! ! ! ! ! ! By! ! ! ! Nikki! Cox ! ! ! ! ! ! ! May !2015 ! ! !The thesis of Nikki Cox is approved: ! ! !Dr. James Snead Date ! ! ! !Dr. Suzanne Scheld Date ! ! ! ! !Dr. Sabina Magliocco, Chair Date ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! California State University, Northridge ii Acknowledgements! ! First and foremost, I must thank Dr. Sabina Magliocco for her unending support. I could not have asked for a better advisor and mentor. Dr. Magliocco, without your guidance and contributions this project would not have been possible. I so greatly appreciate all of the answered questions, suggested reading, helpful hints and advice. I will never forget the day I sat in your office and said, “so there’s this tree.” ! I must thank Dr. Suzanne Scheld and Dr. James Snead for their help with this project. Dr. Scheld, you have helped me grow from a freshman Anthropology major interested in bio- logical Anthropology to a socio-cultural researcher. You continue to push me to see new perspectives and address new problems. I appreciate you so very much. ! Dr. Snead, I am grateful to have had you on my committee, providing helpful pokes in new directions and taking interest in my somewhat crazy project. Your constant encour- agement and excitement was so often just the boost I needed to keep going. ! Thank you to Dr. Helene Rougier for the countless appointments and reassurance that I was on track. Thank you to the entire Department of Anthropology for supporting my passion and encouraging my dream.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles River Master Plan Update
    448 S. Hill St. 5900 Wilshire Blvd Suite 1008 Suite 401 Los Angeles, CA 90013 Los Angeles, CA 90036 310.957.6100 323.387.3598 www.geosyntec.com www.theolinstudio.com PROGRESS MEMORANDUM TO: Carolina Hernandez, P.E., Los Angeles County Public Works PROJECT: Los Angeles River Master Plan Update TASK NUMBER: 3.6 SUBJECT: Existing Open Space, Recreation, and Trails SUBMITTED BY: Jessica M. Henson, RLA, ASLA, OLIN Mark Hanna, Ph.D., P.E., Geosyntec Andrew Dobshinsky, AICP CUD, OLIN Michael Miller, RLA, ASLA, OLIN Nate Wooten, RA, AIA, ASLA, OLIN DATE: 19 November 2018 MEMO NUMBER: 3.6-4 The following Progress Memorandum summarizes the findings for the Los Angeles River Master Plan Update Task 3.6 related to existing open space, recreation, and trails. Executive Summary Existing open space along the Los Angeles River corridor is fragmented and limited in quantity relative to overall population and population density. Twelve of fourteen communities directly adjacent to the river corridor do not meet LA County’s adopted goal of 4 acres of local parkland per 1000 people. Furthermore, twelve of seventeen cities within a mile of the river do not meet the World Health Organization’s recommended minimum of 2.22 acres per 1000 people. Many of the municipalities within a mile of the river also have goals for park space that are higher than the overall LA County goals. In addition to the lack of overall open space, several areas along the river lack a mix of park sizes and amenities. Several stretches of the river corridor do not have access to regional parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Hugh Hefner Is Final Donor As Land Around Hollywood Sign Is Saved
    NEWS For Immediate Release April 26, 2010 Contact: Tim Ahern, 415-710-9095 [email protected] HUGH HEFNER IS FINAL DONOR AS LAND AROUND HOLLYWOOD SIGN IS SAVED LOS ANGELES – The Trust for Public Land (TPL) today announced it has raised enough money to buy and protect the 138 acres behind the world-famous Hollywood Sign, as Playboy magazine founder Hugh Hefner stepped forward to close the gap with a $900,000 donation toward the $12.5 million needed. “Today, we have the Hollywood ending we hoped for and now Cahuenga Peak will be forever protected by adding it to Griffith Park,” said Will Rogers, TPL President. “We want to thank the thousands of donors worldwide who so generously helped us, and we owe a particular thanks to Hugh Hefner, who stepped forward at the end to close the final gap.” Gov. Arnold Schwarzengger, an early supporter of the effort, said, “Of all the iconic landmarks in the world, the Hollywood Sign is truly one of the most recognizable symbols of the California dream and land of opportunity. It called to me when I left Austria and made my way to the U.S., with a few dollars in my pocket and the dream of becoming an actor. I am proud we were able to come together and create a public-private partnership to protect this historic symbol that will continue to welcome dreamers, artists and Austrian bodybuilders for generations to come.” “This is a great day for all of us,” said Los Angeles Council Member Tom LaBonge. “I have climbed Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Lee Pumping Station and Pipe Line Project Phase I Archaeological Assessment Los Angeles County, California
    MOUNT LEE PUMPING STATION AND PIPE LINE PROJECT PHASE I ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: James R. Tebbetts Environmental Specialist II Environmental Management Division 1149 S. Broadway, Suite 600, Mail Stop 939 Los Angeles, California 90015-2213 Prepared by: AECOM 515 South Flower Street, 8th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 Authors: Marc A. Beherec, Ph.D., RPA M. K. Meiser, M.A. Allison N. Hill, B.A. May 2015 Acres: approximately 25 U.S.G.S. 7.5’ Quadrangle: Burbank Keywords: Mount Lee, Griffith Park, Hollywoodland, Mount Lee Communication Complex, Tyrolean Water Tank, Wayne R. Wright Pump House, Civil Defense facilities, City of Los Angeles Emergency Operating Center, Cold War TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... iii INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 Report Organization ............................................................................................................ 1 Project Personnel ................................................................................................................ 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................. 3 Project Location and Setting ............................................................................................... 3 Proposed
    [Show full text]
  • Report of General C.D. 4 Board of Recreation and Park Commissioners Subject: Council District 4
    REPORT OF GENERAL NO. 10-080 DATE April 7, 2010 BOARD OF RECFEATiON C.D. 4 and PAM-6SK)NERS BOARD OF RECREATION AND PARK COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: COUNCIL DISTRICT 4 - QUIMBY/ZONE CHANGE FEES PLAN FOR PROJECTS AND ALLOCATION PROGRAM R. Adarns J. Kolb H. Fujita F. Mok S. Huntley K. Regan V. Israel 'M. Shull Approved Disapproved Withdrawn RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Board: 1. Take the following actions regarding Cahuenga Peak - Park Acquisition (W.O. #PRJ20093): A. Authorize the Department's Chief Accounting Employee to transfer $68,925.00 in Quimby Fees from the Campo De Cahuenga Account No. 460K-CK to the Cahuenga Peak Account No. 460K-CU; B. Authorize the Department's Chief Accounting Employee to transfer $279,883.00 in Quimby Fees, which were collected in Fiscal Year 2005-2006, from the Quimby Fees Account No. 460K-00 to the Cahuenga Peak Account No. 460K- cu; C. Authorize the Department's Chief Accounting Employee to transfer $91,702.00 in Quimby Fees, which were collected in Fiscal Year 2006-2007, from the Quimby Fees Account No. 460K-00 to the Cahuenga Peak Account No. 460K-CU; D. Authorize the Department's Chief Accounting Employee to transfer $104,362.00 in Quimby Fees, which were collected in Fiscal Year 2007-2008, from the Quimby Fees Account No. 460K-00 to the Cahuenga Peak Account No. 460K- CU; and, REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER PG. 2 NO. 10-080 E. Approve the allocation of $544,872.00 in Quimby Fees from Cahuenga Peak Account No. 460K-CU for the Park Acquisition project at Cahuenga Peak, as described in the Summary of this report.
    [Show full text]