Yarra Inputs – Tracking Sources of Faecal Pollution

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Yarra Inputs – Tracking Sources of Faecal Pollution YARRA INPUTS – TRACKING SOURCES OF FAECAL POLLUTION Publication 1057 March 2007 presence of bacterial contamination presents a INTRODUCTION potential public health risk to recreational users. The Yarra River has shaped Melbourne’s While many gains have been achieved over the past development and growth, supporting industry and few decades, the Government’s Yarra River Action tourism, and is highly valued as an environmental Plan identifies more work that needs to be done to and recreational asset. improve water quality further. Two million Melburnians live and work in the Identifying the types of faecal contamination and suburbs that drain into the Yarra River. Growing how and where it is entering the Yarra River is population, expanding urban development and fundamental to ongoing improvements in intensification of agriculture activities in the recreational water quality. This information is catchment are all placing increasing stress on the necessary to allow the direction of management river and directly impacting on its water quality. action and resource investment to areas where they The Yarra River is being used more and more for a will have the maximum benefit in reducing faecal range of water-based recreational activities, and the contamination inputs. Figure 1: Yarra inputs – drains, tributaries and river sample sites 1 YARRA INPUTS – TRACKING SOURCES OF FAECAL POLLUTION EPA Victoria and Melbourne Water are leading a IDENTIFYING THE SOURCES three-year Yarra River Action Plan project to locate Bacterial levels start to climb noticeably in the and remove key sources of faecal pollution entering middle and lower reaches of the Yarra River and it is the middle and lower reaches of the Yarra River. in these areas that water-based recreational This report provides a summary of the first-year activities become more frequent. The screening screening investigation. This was undertaken to investigation was carried out to identify the most identify which of the many stormwater drains and significant sources of faecal contamination in this tributaries entering the Yarra River: stretch of the river. • contribute significant levels of faecal Ten major metropolitan tributaries and 29 contamination to the river stormwater drains flow into the Yarra between • require further detailed investigation to Warrandyte and Docklands. Of these, there is a pinpoint the sources and direct works to significantly higher density of stormwater drains in remove these sources. the lower reaches of the Yarra River downstream of Kew. SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION Samples were collected from these tributaries and drains, at or near the point of entry into the Yarra Melbourne’s extensive drainage system carries River, as well as at 13 locations in the river itself stormwater from our streets and buildings through a (Figure 1). Sampling occurred on six days during late series of gutters, pipes and drains and discharges it 2005, in both wet and dry weather conditions. into rivers and creeks. The city’s extensive sewerage E.coli indicator bacteria were measured at all sites, system carries sewage through another series of along with other water quality indicators such as pipes to sewage treatment plants. nutrients. Flow rates entering the river were In dry weather, potential sources of faecal measured or estimated, to provide an indication of contamination include sewer blockages, seepage of the relative contributions to the faecal load in the sewage from the system, and cross-connections river from the various input tributaries and drains. between sewerage and stormwater pipes. Poorly Where bacterial levels were found to be elevated, operating septic tanks and animal inputs are also the faecal sterols method (developed by CSIRO) was potential contributors. also employed to assist in identifying whether In wet weather, the amount of contamination in the human faecal contamination was present in the river may increase from a number of sources, drains and tributaries. One faecal sterol in particular including increased run-off from stormwater drains, – coprostanol – is a biomarker of human surface run-off direct to the river and sewer contamination, constituting approximately 60% of emergency relief structures allowing temporary the total sterols found in human faeces. Some of the discharge of sewage to waterways during heavy Yarra River sites were also analysed for faecal storms. EPA Victoria 2 YARRA INPUTS – TRACKING SOURCES OF FAECAL POLLUTION sterols, regardless of their measured bacterial human faecal contamination. Some drains showed levels. very high proportions of human faecal matter compared to other sources of bacterial contamination on one or more sampling days. WHAT WE FOUND The results clearly indicate a number of drains, such The results (in the Appendix) showed that bacterial as Harper Street, Elizabeth Street and Kew, as levels entering the river varied considerably, both significant sources of bacterial contamination. between the sites and across the different sample Others show little signs of contamination – for dates at the same site. There are, however, some example, Banyule, Yarra Park and Federation Square general comments that can be made. drains. There are also a relatively large number of In dry weather, many of the drains had much higher drains that show a great deal of variability in the E.coli concentrations than the tributaries and the E.coli, flow or human faecal biomarker results. river itself. There was also much more variability between samples taken from individual drains. IDENTIFYING PRIORITY SOURCES Because of the generally higher flows in the tributaries compared to the drains, the E.coli load An assessment of the results from the screening for the tributaries was often relatively higher in dry investigation, and historical information where weather. Despite this, the E.coli concentration in available, was undertaken to identify the tributaries many of the tributaries was often similar to, or less and drains that are significant sources of faecal than, the concentration in the river, so the effect of contamination to the Yarra River. the tributary input was often only minor. The assessment considered the results based on the Rainfall run-off is known to contribute to elevated premise that, if our stormwater and sewerage bacterial levels. In wet weather, both the drains and systems are performing well: tributaries generally had much higher • in dry weather, there should be little bacterial concentrations and loads of bacteria than in dry contamination present in drains and weather. Again, the drain samples showed the most tributaries, and evidence of human faecal variation between the sampling events. With higher contributions should not be found flows on wet-weather sampling days, the tributaries • in wet weather, bacterial levels will increase made much greater relative contributions of faecal from a range of sources, but evidence of load than the drains. As would be expected, the wet- human faecal contributions should only be weather samples from the mainstream Yarra River found in storm events, when sewer sites had higher E.coli levels than the dry-weather emergency relief structures activate (allowing samples. temporary discharge of sewage to Most drains recorded the faecal biomarker waterways). coprostanol at a level indicating the presence of Information Bulletin 3 YARRA INPUTS – TRACKING SOURCES OF FAECAL POLLUTION The determination of priorities was based on an • Bulleen North Main Drain analysis of the following factors: • Prahran Main Drain • presence of high levels of E.coli on more than • Fairfield Main Drain one occasion • Glass Creek Main Drain • the load or volume of bacterial contamination • Gardiners Creek contributed to the Yarra River • Koonung Creek • the change in bacterial levels that this load would cause in the river itself • Darebin Creek. • biomarkers of human faecal contamination found in significant proportions relative to the PROGRESS OF PRIORITY total bacterial levels INVESTIGATIONS • the significance of results in dry weather Intensive follow-up investigations are under way on (when there should be little contamination) a number of the priority drains that are easily and wet-weather conditions accessible: • for the tributaries where there was monitoring • Harper Street Main Drain data available, the number of years of • Kew Main Drain elevated E.coli levels. Salt Creek Main Drain From this process, 12 priority stormwater drains and • three tributaries (listed below) have been identified. • Hawthorn Main Drain Further detailed follow-up investigations on each of • Locksley Road Main Drain these drains and creeks is required in order to identify where faecal contamination is being • Bulleen North Main Drain introduced into these systems. • Prahran Main Drain. • Harper Street Main Drain This involves walking through the larger stormwater drains, taking samples inside the drains and using • Elizabeth Street Main Drain closed circuit television for the smaller stormwater • Kew Main Drain drains. Councils and water retailers are assisting • Princes Bridge Drain with these investigations. • Salt Creek Main Drain An investigation of the Elizabeth Street and Princes Bridge drains has also commenced. The lower • Hawthorn Main Drain sections of these drains are continuously flooded, • Locksley Road Main Drain cannot be safely entered, and require a different • Porter Street Main Drain range of methods. A ‘toolkit’ of methods is being EPA Victoria 4 YARRA INPUTS – TRACKING SOURCES OF FAECAL POLLUTION
Recommended publications
  • Urban Biodiversity Strategy 2013-2023
    Map of Boroondara's biodiversity corridors, biogeographical zones and biologically significant sites. Koonung Creek Corridor 3 4 BALWYN 2 6 5 8 NORTH 18 Yarra River 18 7 Eastern Freeway Map of Boroondara's biodiversity corridors, Corridor Glass Creek 9 35 Corridor biogeographical zones and biologically significant10 sites. 58 36 Bulleen Road 1 Doncaster Road MapMap of Boroondara's 1: Boroondara’s biodiversity biodiversity corridors, corridors, 40 Hyde Park KEW 11 39 Corridor 34 Balwyn North Corridor biogeographicalbiogeographical zones zones and and biologically biologically significant significant sites.sites EAST 33 Studley 41 32 Koonung Creek Corridor Park 3 57 Kew 12 Corridor4 37 38BALWYN 31 2 Belmore Road Studley Park Road 6 5 8 High StreetKoonungKEWNORTH Creek Corridor PrincessStreet 3 18 Yarra River 7 BALWYN 18 Glass Creek4Eastern Freeway Cotham Road Corridor 42 54 9 35 Corridor HAWTHORNBALWYN 2 Whitehorse Road 6 5 BalwynRoad 10 8 13 43 NORTH 58 56 53 36 BulleenEAST Road 1 18 44 Yarra River 18 7 Eastern Freeway Barkers RoadDoncaster Road 55 40Corridor Hyde Park KEW14Glass Creek 11 9 Corridor CorridorChurch Street 34 Balwyn North Corridor 10 39 35 DenmarkStreet CANTERBURY EAST4833 46 58 Studley 41 36 15 Bulleen Road 1 32 47 57 45 52 Park Doncaster Road CanterburySURREY Corridor 40 KewHyde Park KEW 11 12 39 CorridorCorridor 37 34 BalwynBurwood North Corridor Road HILLS EAST38 33 31 Belmore Road WarrigalRoad Studley Park Road 51 Canterbury Road Studley 41 32 Park High Street KEW 57 HAWTHORN KewPrincessStreet 16 BurkeRoad 12 Corridor
    [Show full text]
  • 215044 Environmental Justice Australia/Yarra Riverkeeper
    DRAFT YARRA STRATEGIC PLAN PUBLIC CONSULTATION SUBMISSION COVER SHEET Submission Number: 215044 Name (Individual/Organisation): Environmental Justice Australia/Yarra Riverkeeper Association Attachments: Attachment 1 – Written submission Submission in response to The Draft Yarra Strategic Plan prepared by Environmental Justice Australia (EJA) and the Yarra Riverkeeper Association (YRKA) 28 March 2020 Environmental PO Box 12123 T (03) 8341 3100 Justice Australia A'Beckett Street PO F (03) 8341 3111 ABN 74052124375 Melbourne VIC 8006 E [email protected] L3, 60 Leicester St, Carlton W www.envirojustice.org.au For further information on this submission, please contact: Submitted to: [email protected] 28 March 2020 Environmental Justice Australia 2 1. Introduction This submission is made jointly by Environmental Justice Australia (EJA) and the Yarra Riverkeeper Association (YRKA). EJA was established more than 30 years ago as a legal practice focused on public interest environmental law and in that time has worked in a wide range of environmental, planning and natural resource law issues and cases. EJA undertakes litigation, law and policy reform, campaigns and community legal education. YRKA is a nongovernmental organisation that was established in order to provide a ‘voice’ for the Yarra River and its communities. YRKA has engaged extensively for more than a decade on campaigning, policy reform and community engagement for the protection, improvement and restoration of the River. EJA and YRKA have worked closely and collaboratively for law and policy reform for the Yarra River since 2014. In that year, YRKA published a proposal for a Yarra River Act and a single trust to manage the river corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • The News of the Melbourne Bushwalk£Rs Melbourne Bushwalkers Incorporated
    THE NEWS OF THE MELBOURNE BUSHWALK£RS MELBOURNE BUSHWALKERS INCORPORATED EDITION 512 OCTOBER 1993 PRICE 60 C Registered by Australia Post Publication No. VBH 1297 SOCIAL EVENTS MOVIE NIGHT GUEST SPEAKER Tuesday 12 October 7.00 p.m. Wednesday·27 October Village City Centre Clubrooms 8.00 p.m. 206 Bourke St This month's speaker, Doug Humann, is It was recently suggested to me that Club members from the VNPA. may be interested in the scenery (if not the story) of As we have recently made a very THE SILVER BRUMBY substantial donation to the VNPA to assist with one of their research projects, this will This beautifully fihned movie is from the novel by Elyne Mitchell and was shot in the picturesque area provide an opportunity to hear at first hand of Northern Victoria near Corryong. how the project is progressing. The review I have read describes it as "Ideal family Come along and show support for an entertainment with a nice sense of mystery." organisation which speaks out for the aims So let's give it a go! and ideals our Club also supports! Aftexwards we will dine somewhere nearby. Juice and nibbles provided. Don't forget, our members (& guests) are ADVANCE NOTICE stilt winding down after a Sunday walk by dining out at the cafes of Southbank. November's Slide Show will be from Robyn Gray's Euerybody is welcome, come as you are, no Franklin River/China(New Zealand collection. washing up, great for a scotsman's pocket! Judging by the preview - should be good! Secondly, the pre-meeting get together at TOTO'S shows no sign of abating.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter No. 108: September 2014
    NEWSLETTER No. 108 September 2014 Serving the community, families, schools, students, historians and The Housemuseum other researchers A number of historians and biographers have described the lives of artists with a connection to Kew. Some artists were born in Kew, such as the modernists George Bell (1878-1966) and Horace Brodzky (1885-1969). Others made their homes here, including Artur Loureiro (1853-1932), William Nichols Anderson (1872-1927), Alice Bale (1875-1955) and Alma Contents Figuerola (1895-1969). Mme. Figuerola, who lived in d’Estaville in Barry Street, was one of the first members of the Kew Historical Society. W. Nichols Anderson, a pupil of Frederick McCubbin, lived at various times in Cobden SOCIETY ACTIVITIES Street, Parkhill Road and High Street. His daughter was to donate one of his 3 News about exhibitions, special paintings to the Society. Anderson’s depiction of ‘Adeney Avenue from High events, past and future meetings Street, Kew’ (1906) is now one of the ‘treasures’ of our collection. Kew has also been home to significant patrons of the arts. Carl Pinschof THE STORY OF A SCHOOL (1855-1926) and his wife, the soprano Elise Wiedermann (1851-1922), 4 An account of the establishment assembled a significant collection of works by contemporary Australian and history of Kew High School painters and sculptors including works by Arthur Streeton, Tom Roberts, McCubbin, and Bertram Mckennal. Pamela Niehoff describes how, after the GLASS’S CREEK POUND purchase of Mackennal’s bronze statue ‘Circe’ by the Pinschofs, it was placed ‘… between the two grand pianos at the end of the ballroom, framed by the 6 A description of Kew’s first animal 1 pound on the corner of Burke Road arched window’ in ‘Studley Hall.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Inland Fishing, Hunting & Trapping REGULATIONS DIGEST
    North Carolina Inland Fishing, Hunting & Trapping REGULATIONS DIGEST 2021–2022 Effective Aug. 1, 2021 to July 31, 2022 Online at ncwildlife.org Hunt with the Big Dogs On the Currituck Outer Banks, NC The Land of the Wild Goose Currituck is an Algonquin Indian word that means “the land of the wild goose,” and many outdoorsmen have discovered it’s not a fairy tale but rather the stuff of legend. Miles of unspoiled natural habitat, waters, marshes, and woods Corolla • Carova • The Mainland await you where the big dogs hunt, Currituck, NC. Call 877.287.7488 for information or your visitor’s guide Find your guide at VisitCurrituck.com North Carolina Inland Fishing, Hunting & Trapping Contents REGULATIONS DIGEST What’s New This Season �����������������������6 Trapping Regulations and Information ..................................... 52 2021–2022 License Information ................................8 General Information ........................... 8 Hunting Regulations License Requirements and Information .....................................54 State of North Carolina and Exceptions ..................................... 8 Manner of Taking �������������������������������54 Governor Roy Cooper, License Type Descriptions ��������������12 Hunting on Federal Lands ���������������58 Big Game Harvest Reporting ���������59 North Carolina Wildlife License Type Charts ��������������������������20 Bear Seasons and Maps �������������������60 Resources Commission Disabled Sportsman Deer Seasons and Maps ������������������62 Program Information ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • SHADY PLACES : Hawthorn's Parks, Gardens and 'Public' Property
    Hawthorn’s creeks, perhaps the main one once as Boorondara SHADY PLACES : Hawthorn's Parks, Gardens and 'Public' Property. 1 The name Boroondara came from an aboriginal word meaning ‘place of shade’, chosen by government surveyor Robert Hoddle for a Parish, covering an area similar to the present City. The first white visitors commented on the dense forests - of stringybark, box and mountain ash - stretching for miles beyond the river. There are still indigenous gums, wattles and casuarinas, but our shade provided now mainly by exotic foreign trees and buildings. Land near Melbourne was surveyed, with numbered Allotments leased to squatters or woodcutters then sold. ‘Reserve’ was marked, by a river or creek with access to water, for a village or some public use. Today, pockets of public land are dotted across Boroondara - like odd-shaped beads on a broken string - some not far from the river, but following watercourses now not so obvious with creek later a drain. Some parks and gardens (now with bike paths, as on-leash or off-leash for dogs…) were donated by public-spirited citizens, acquired in lieu of unpaid rates, or not suitable for building - as swampy, flood-prone, where clay or road- metal was dug, and land-fill unstable. However, in recent years,‘public’ places once with community services for elderly citizens or child care seem to have gone, with churches ‘uniting’, or property sold. In 1886 Hawthorn Council discussed using brickpits for rubbish dumps - dismissed as foolish but adopted - for useful rather than recreational purposes: where horses were stabled, road-metal stored, until required Dog Parks for community centre, drill hall, kindergarten, then power line or freeway.
    [Show full text]
  • Glass's Creek Pound
    Kew Historical Society - Commerce and Industry series Glass’s Creek Pound The City of Boroondara currently advises that any dogs and cats ‘found at large’ will be taken to the Council Pound in Glen Iris. Before the amalgamation of individual cities into the City of Boroondara in 1994, most cities funded and managed their own pounds. The term pound comes from the Middle English ‘pund’, used to define or describe an enclosure. Current usage of the term derives from this original meaning and encompasses places for the detention of stray animals, a space where automobiles are impounded, a section of a canal between two locks, and even a type of fishing net. It can be difficult to establish with certainty the dates when the first pounds were established in the Port Phillip District. A Proclamation by Governor Gipps in 1840 ordered and directed that ‘Notice of all Cattle impounded in the Public Pounds in the District of Port Phillip should be published by the Poundkeepers of such Pounds in one or more of the Newspapers published at the Town of Melbourne, in the County of Bourke ...’. The Proclamation, amended in 1846, presupposes that a number of public pounds already existed. While the first successful land sales in Boroondara occurred in Hawthorn in 1843, and Kew in 1845, these areas were to be without local pounds until April 1858, when the Governor of Victoria, in accordance with Act 18 Victoria No 30, was pleased to direct the establishment of a Pound at Glass’s Creek on that part of land bounded by the Kilby Road, Burke Road and High Street.
    [Show full text]
  • 11178 EAR 188 Whitehorse Road, Balwyn I February 2013
    INFORMATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT REPORTS August 2007 VICTORIA’S AUDIT SYSTEM AUDIT REPORT CURRENCY An environmental audit system has operated in Audit reports are based on the conditions encountered Victoria since 1989. The Environment Protection Act and information reviewed at the time of preparation 1970 (the Act) provides for the appointment by the and do not represent any changes that may have Environment Protection Authority (EPA Victoria) of occurred since the date of completion. As it is not environmental auditors and the conduct of possible for an audit to present all data that could be independent, high quality and rigorous environmental of interest to all readers, consideration should be audits. made to any appendices or referenced documentation An environmental audit is an assessment of the for further information. condition of the environment, or the nature and extent When information regarding the condition of a site of harm (or risk of harm) posed by an industrial changes from that at the time an audit report is process or activity, waste, substance or noise. issued, or where an administrative or computation Environmental audit reports are prepared by EPA- error is identified, environmental audit reports, appointed environmental auditors who are highly certificates and statements may be withdrawn or qualified and skilled individuals. amended by an environmental auditor. Users are Under the Act, the function of an environmental advised to check EPA’s website to ensure the currency auditor is to conduct environmental audits and of the audit document. prepare environmental audit reports. Where an environmental audit is conducted to determine the PDF SEARCHABILITY AND PRINTING condition of a site or its suitability for certain uses, an environmental auditor may issue either a certificate or EPA Victoria can only certify the accuracy and statement of environmental audit.
    [Show full text]
  • Boroondara City Council Storm and Flood Emergency Plan
    Boroondara City Council Storm and Flood Emergency Plan A Sub-Plan of the Municipal Emergency Management Plan De - Identified Document All names and contact details removed Approved for Public Distribution For the City of Boroondara and VICSES Units Malvern & Whitehorse Version 4.0 Table of Contents DISTRIBUTION LIST .................................................................................................................................... VII DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL FORM / AMENDMENT CERTIFICATE ...................................................... VIII LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMS ................................................................................................. IX PART 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 MUNICIPAL ENDORSEMENT ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 THE MUNICIPALITY ............................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THIS STORM AND FLOOD EMERGENCY PLAN ................................................ 2 1.4 MUNICIPAL FLOOD PLANNING COMMITTEE (MFPC) ............................................................................ 2 1.5 RESPONSIBILITY FOR PLANNING, REVIEW AND MAINTENANCE OF THIS PLAN ........................................ 2 1.6 ENDORSEMENT OF THE PLAN ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Expert Opinion CAPE OTWAY ROAD AUSTRALIA (‘CORA’) DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
    Expert Opinion CAPE OTWAY ROAD AUSTRALIA (‘CORA’) DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE COESR Pty Ltd Panel Hearing: Amendment C125 to the Surf Coast Shire Planning Scheme January 2020 Report Author: Warwick Bishop Title: Final Report Address of Property: 1300 Cape Otway Road, Modewarre VIC 3240 Report Prepared For: COESR Pty Ltd Instructed By: Mark Naughton (Planning & Property Partners Pty Ltd) Panel Hearing: Amendment C125 to the Surf Coast Shire Planning Scheme Date of Report 22 January 2020 Document Name 20010145_R01_v02e_Expert Witness Report.docx 15 Business Park Drive Notting Hill VIC 3168 Telephone (03) 8526 0800 Fax (03) 9558 9365 ACN 093 377 283 ABN 60 093 377 283 20010145_R01_v02e_Expert Report.docxWitness COESR Pty Ltd | January 2020 CAPE OTWAY ROAD AUSTRALIA (‘CORA’) DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE Page 2 CONTENTS 1 REPORT AUTHOR 6 2 REPORT CONTRIBUTORS 7 3 SCOPE OF REPORT 8 4 BASIS OF THIS REPORT 9 5 INTRODUCTION 10 6 BACKGROUND 11 6.1 Locality 11 6.2 Proposed Development 12 7 REVIEW OF FLOOD REPORT 14 7.1 Overview 14 7.2 Flooding from Lake Modewarre 14 7.2.1 Flood Modelling Approach 14 7.2.2 Worst-case Scenario 15 7.3 Flooding from the Waterway 16 7.4 Impact of Proposed Development 17 7.4.1 Overview 17 7.4.2 Objective 1 – Flood Safety 17 7.4.3 Objective 2 – Flood Damage 18 7.4.4 Objective 3 - Flood Impact 18 7.4.5 Objective 4 - Waterway and Floodplain Protection 21 8 REVIEW OF INTEGRATED WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 22 8.1 Overview 22 8.2 Water Sensitive Urban Design Strategy 22 8.3 Impact on Downstream Environment 23 Retarding Basins
    [Show full text]
  • Expert Opinion - Flooding Issues Amendment C221 to the Greater Bendigo Planning Scheme
    Expert Opinion - Flooding Issues Amendment C221 to the Greater Bendigo Planning Scheme City of Greater Bendigo October 2016 Project Name Amendment C221 to the Greater Bendigo Planning Scheme Report Prepared for City of Greater Bendigo Instructed By Emma Bryant, City of Greater Bendigo Report Author Warwick Bishop Document Number 1957-01R01v01c.docx Report Date 10 October 2016 15 Business Park Drive Notting Hill VIC 3168 Telephone (03) 8526 0800 Fax (03) 9558 9365 ACN 093 377 283 ABN 60 093 377 283 01R01v01.docx - 1957 City of Greater Bendigo | October 2016 Amendment C221 to the Greater Bendigo Planning Scheme Page 2 CONTENTS 1 REPORT AUTHOR 5 2 STATEMENT OF EXPERTISE 5 3 REPORT CONTRIBUTOR 5 4 SCOPE OF THIS REPORT 6 5 BASIS OF THIS REPORT 6 6 INTRODUCTION 7 7 BENDIGO URBAN FLOOD STUDY 7 8 SUBMISSIONS 8 8.1 General Comments Regarding Submissions 8 8.2 Response to specific Submissions 8 8.2.1 Submission 18 – 126-128 High Street, Kangaroo Flat 9 8.2.2 Submission 19 – Huntly (Multiple Locations) 10 8.2.3 Submission 28 - Epsom-Huntly Drainage Committee 16 8.2.4 Submission 31 – 89 Sargeants Road, Epsom 17 8.2.5 Submission 45 Strickland Street, Ascot 18 8.2.6 Submission 40 - UDIA Northern Chapter 19 9 CONCLUSIONS 22 10 DECLARATION 22 APPENDICES Appendix A Submissions Responded to by Water Technology LIST OF FIGURES Figure 8-1 126 – 128 High Street, Kangaroo Flat 10 Figure 8-2 Modelled levee breach locations 11 Figure 8-3 Levee Failure Scenario Mapping 12 Figure 8-3 Cross Section downstream of Sargeants Road 13 Figure 8-4 Submission 19 – Attachment
    [Show full text]
  • Submission the Draft Yarra Strategic Plan Environmental Justice Australia
    Submission in response to The Draft Yarra Strategic Plan prepared by Environmental Justice Australia (EJA) and the Yarra Riverkeeper Association (YRKA) 28 March 2020 Environmental PO Box 12123 T (03) 8341 3100 Justice Australia A'Beckett Street PO F (03) 8341 3111 ABN 74052124375 Melbourne VIC 8006 E [email protected] L3, 60 Leicester St, Carlton W www.envirojustice.org.au For further information on this submission, please contact: For Environmental Justice Australia: Dr Bruce Lindsay, Senior Lawyer For Yarra Riverkeeper Association: Andrew Kelly, Yarra Riverkeeper T: 03 8341 3100 (EJA), 0408 850 810 (YRKA) Submitted to: [email protected] 28 March 2020 Environmental Justice Australia 2 1. Introduction This submission is made jointly by Environmental Justice Australia (EJA) and the Yarra Riverkeeper Association (YRKA). EJA was established more than 30 years ago as a legal practice focused on public interest environmental law and in that time has worked in a wide range of environmental, planning and natural resource law issues and cases. EJA undertakes litigation, law and policy reform, campaigns and community legal education. YRKA is a nongovernmental organisation that was established in order to provide a ‘voice’ for the Yarra River and its communities. YRKA has engaged extensively for more than a decade on campaigning, policy reform and community engagement for the protection, improvement and restoration of the River. EJA and YRKA have worked closely and collaboratively for law and policy reform for the Yarra River since 2014. In that year, YRKA published a proposal for a Yarra River Act and a single trust to manage the river corridor.
    [Show full text]