Oil Refinery Permits Handbook

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Oil Refinery Permits Handbook Oil Refinery Permits Photo by Ken Ford A Handbook for Citizen Participation in the Permitting of Oil Refineries under the New Source Review Provisions of the Clean Air Act December 2007 Oil Refinery Permits A Handbook for Citizen Participation in the Permitting of Oil Refineries under the New Source Review Provisions of the Clean Air Act Author: Benjamin J. Wakefield Counsel, Environmental Integrity Project [email protected] Copyright © 2007, The Environmental Integrity Project The Environmental Integrity Project (EIP) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization established in March of 2002 by former EPA enforcement attorneys to advocate for more effective enforcement of environmental laws. EIP has three objectives: 1) to provide objective analyses of how the failure to enforce or implement environmental laws increases pollution and affects the public’s health; 2) to hold federal and state agencies, as well as individual corporations, accountable for failing to enforce or comply with environmental laws; and 3) to help local communities obtain the protection of environmental laws. An electronic copy of this Manual can be downloaded free of charge from the EIP website at www.environmentalintegrity.org . Acknowledgements This project received funding support from the Marisla Foundation. Such support does not indicate endorsement by the Marisla Foundation of the contents of this Handbook. “The ABCs of NSR – A Citizen’s Guide to the Clean Air Act’s New Source Review Permitting Process,” written by Laura Haight, et al. , for the New York Public Interest Research Group Fund, Inc., is an excellent guide to the law and process of the NSR program in general, upon which this Handbook has relied and to which it owes a great debt of gratitude. This Handbook has also relied upon “The Proof is in the Permit – How to Make Sure a Facility in Your Community Gets an Effective Title V Air Pollution Permit,” an excellent and detailed guide to participation in the Clean Air Act Title V permitting process, written by Keri Powell, et al. , for the New York Public Interest Research Group Fund, Inc., and the Earth Day Coalition, Inc. This project was completed under the direction of EIP’s Executive Director, Eric Schaeffer. EIP’s Senior Counsel, Karla Raettig, contributed to portions of the text. In addition, portions of the text are taken from EIP’s report, “Gaming the System – How Off-the-Books Industrial Upset Emissions Cheat the Public Out of Clean Air” (EIP, August 2004), written principally by Kelly Haragan. Alex Sagady, of Alex J. Sagady and Associates, provided valuable expertise and consultation regarding the technological processes involved in petroleum refining. Finally, thanks to Kathy Andria (American Bottom Conservancy), Bob Levy (Industry Professionals for Clean Air), Adam Babich and Michael Murphy (Tulane Environmental Law Clinic), and others for reviewing drafts of this Manual. Their comments greatly strengthened the final product. Their listing does not constitute an endorsement of the content of this Manual. Table of Contents Introduction …………………………………………………………………....………. 1 How this Handbook is Organized ………………………………………………...…… 4 I. OVERVIEW OF NEW SOURCE REVIEW …………………………….…. 6 A. The Law ……………………………………………………………….. 6 B. The Permitting Process ……………………………………......…….. 12 1. Background …………………………………………….……. 12 2. Steps in the Process ……………………………………..…… 13 II. REFINING 101 – A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO HOW REFINERIES WORK ………….…………………………………………… 17 A. Desalting ……………………………………………………………… 18 B. Fractional Distillation …………………………………………..…… 18 C. Cracking ……………………………………………………………… 19 1. Thermal Cracking …………………………………...………. 19 2. Coking ……………………………………………………..…. 20 3. Catalytic Cracking ……………………………..……………. 21 D. Catalytic Hydrocracking …………………………………...……….. 22 E. Heaters and Boilers …………………………………………..……… 22 F. Wastewater Treatment ……………………………………...………. 23 G. Sulfur Recovery ……………………………………………..……….. 24 H. Flare System ……………………………………………...………….. 25 I. Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) ……………………………….. 25 J. Storage Tanks ……………………………………………....….…….. 26 i III. KEY ISSUES IN CONSTRUCTION (“NSR”) REFINERY PERMITS ……………………………………………………………………. 26 A. Issues Pertaining to both PSD and NA NSR Construction Permits ……………………………………………………….………. 27 1. Emissions increases and NSR applicability ………………... 27 a. “Major Stationary Source” and “Regulated NSR Pollutants” ……………………………..………. 29 b. Physical or Operational Change ……………………. 29 c. Significant Emissions Increase ………………..……. 29 d. Significant Net Emissions Increase (a.k.a., “Netting”) ………………….………………… 33 2. Monitoring, Recordkeeping, and Reporting …………...….. 36 a. Types of Monitoring Technology ………………..….. 37 b. Practical Enforceability …………………...………… 41 i. Ambiguity ……………………….…………… 41 ii. Recordkeeping and Reporting …………..….. 44 iii. Permitted Non-Compliance …………………. 44 iv. Limiting “Credible Evidence” …………..….. 45 3. “Startup, Shutdown & Maintenance” and “Upsets” ……… 46 4. Environmental Justice ……………………………….……… 50 5. Class I Area Impacts …………………………………..…….. 51 B. PSD Permit Issues …………………………………………………… 53 1. BACT Analysis …………………………...………………….. 53 2. Air Quality Impact Analysis …………………….………….. 56 3. Additional Impacts Analysis (Soil & Vegetation, Growth, and Visibility) ………………...……………………. 58 ii C. NA NSR Permit Issues …………………………….………………… 59 1. LAER Analysis ………………………………………………. 59 2. Emission Reductions / Offsets ………………………………. 60 3. Demonstration of Compliance …………………….…...…… 61 4. Alternatives Analysis ……………………………..…………. 62 D. Specific BACT (PSD) and LAER (NA NSR) Technologies to Seek in Oil Refinery Construction Permits ……………..………. 62 1. Refinery Heaters and Boilers ……………………………….. 63 2. Waste Flare Gas Systems …………………………………… 64 3. Fluidized Catalytic Cracker Regeneration Units ……..…… 65 4. Fugitive Emissions …………………………………….…….. 66 5. Product Loading Racks and Marine Terminals …….…….. 66 6. Wastewater Management Units ………………………..…… 67 7. Catalytic Refining Catalyst Regeneration Operation …...… 67 8. Internal and External Floating Roof Tanks ……………….. 68 9. Wastewater Treatment Plant Filter Press Sludge Incinerator …………………………………………………… 68 10. Petroleum Coke Handling ………………………….……….. 68 11. Monitoring ………………………………..………………….. 69 Conclusion ……………………………………………….…………………………… 70 Appendices Appendix A: Summary of Issues and Comments for NSR Permits Appendix B: BACT and LAER Technologies for Oil Refineries iii Appendix C: “Significant” Emission Increase Thresholds for “Major Modifications” Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 51.166(b)(23)(i) Appendix D: Ambiguous Language That May Indicate Practical Enforceability Problems Appendix E: Unacceptable Credible Evidence-Limiting Language Appendix F: Minimum Criteria for Excess Emission Affirmative Defenses (Where Available) Appendix G: Key Steps in the “Top-Down” BACT Determination Appendix H: Petroleum Refining Process Flow Chart Appendix I: Mandatory Class I Areas iv Oil Refinery Permits A Handbook for Citizen Participation in the Permitting of Oil Refineries under the New Source Review Provisions of the Clean Air Act Introduction Petroleum refineries emit millions of pounds of air pollution that poses a serious risk of harm to human health and the environment and impairs the quality of life for the people living in nearby communities. Carcinogens and other pollutants are released directly into the predominantly low-income and minority neighborhoods that typically share the refinery fencelines, and many refineries are located in areas that already do not meet federal air quality standards set to protect public health. Further, the environmental consequences of refinery pollution range from acid rain to global warming. Common air pollutants released from oil refineries include volatile organic 1 compounds (VOCs), sulfur dioxide (SO 2), nitrogen oxides (NO X), particulate matter 2 (PM), carbon monoxide (CO), hydrogen sulfide (H 2S), and sulfuric acid aerosol (or “mist”). Many of the pollutants emitted by refineries are “hazardous air pollutants” (“HAPs”), 3 such as benzene, 1,3 butadiene, hexane, 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene, toluene, xylenes, propylenes, naphthalene, carbon disulfide, carbonyl sulfide, selenium compounds, nickel compounds, chromium compounds, cadmium compounds, hydrogen fluoride (hydrofluoric acid (“HF”)), and formaldehyde.4 Many refinery pollutants are also “OSHA carcinogens,” 5 such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (“PAHs” or “polycyclic aromatic compounds” (“PACs”)), benzene, ethylbenzene, 1,3-butadiene, naphthalene, styrene, tetrachloroethylene, formaldehyde, and metals such as nickel and 1 Numerous VOCs emitted by refineries – such as benzene; 1,3 butadiene; toluene; and xylenes – are toxic air pollutants – those known or suspected to cause cancer or other serious human health problems. 2 “Particulate matter” includes “total suspended particulates” (“TSP”), PM 10 (particulate matter between 2.5 and 10 micrometers in diameter), and PM 2.5 (particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 micrometers in diameter). 3 HAPs are pollutants “which are known to be, or may reasonably be anticipated to be, carcinogenic, mutagenic, teratogenic, neurotoxic, which cause reproductive dysfunction, or which are acutely or chronically toxic … or [which cause] adverse environmental effects whether through ambient concentrations, bioaccumulation, deposition, or otherwise….” Clean Air Act § 112(b)(2), 42 U.S.C. § 7412(b)(2). 4 See Clean Air Act § 112(b)(1), 42 U.S.C. § 7412. The original list of 189 HAPs promulgated as part of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 can also
Recommended publications
  • 1 Refinery and Petrochemical Processes
    3 1 Refinery and Petrochemical Processes 1.1 Introduction The combination of high demand for electric cars and higher automobile engine effi- ciency in the future will mean less conversion of petroleum into fuels. However, the demand for petrochemicals is forecast to rise due to the increase in world popula- tion. With this, it is expected that modern and more innovative technologies will be developed to serve the growth of the petrochemical market. In a refinery process, petroleum is converted into petroleum intermediate prod- ucts, including gases, light/heavy naphtha, kerosene, diesel, light gas oil, heavy gas oil, and residue. From these intermediate refinery product streams, several fuels such as fuel gas, liquefied petroleum gas, gasoline, jet fuel, kerosene, auto diesel, and other heavy products such as lubricants, bunker oil, asphalt, and coke are obtained. In addition, these petroleum intermediates can be further processed and separated into products for petrochemical applications. In this chapter, petroleum will be introduced first. Petrochemicals will be intro- duced in the second part of the chapter. Petrochemicals – the main subject of this book – will address three major areas, (i) the production of the seven cornerstone petrochemicals: methane and synthesis gas, ethylene, propylene, butene, benzene, toluene, and xylenes; (ii) the uses of the seven cornerstone petrochemicals, and (iii) the technology to separate petrochemicals into individual components. 1.2 Petroleum Petroleum is derived from the Latin words “petra” and “oleum,” which means “rock” and “oil,” respectively. Petroleum also is known as crude oil or fossil fuel. It is a thick, flammable, yellow-to-black mixture of gaseous, liquid, and solid hydrocarbons formed from the remains of plants and animals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chemistry of Refining Crude Oil SPN#12
    The Chemistry of Refining Crude Oil SPN LESSON #12 LEARNING OUTCOME: Students come to view energy from several viewpoints. They work with the processes of • Phase changes and the many energy transformations and transfers involved in that physical change; • chemical change and the energy it releases. LESSON OVERVIEW: The fractional distillation of crude oil is featured. This major fossil fuel of the modern age is viewed as an example of stored chemical energy. Alcohol and water are separated and recaptured by taking advantage of the differences in the two substances’ boiling points. The many components of crude oil are explored and students are introduced to organic chemical formulas, characteristics of changes in phases, and laboratory distillation procedures. GRADE-LEVEL APPROPRIATENESS: This Level II Physical Setting, technology education lesson is intended for students in grades 5–8. MATERIALS (per group) Safety goggles (per person) Lab apron (per person) Bunsen burner Ring stand with utility clamp Metal pan 3 medium test tubes Test tube rack Boiling chip 2-hole stopper 10 cm glass tubing with 90o bend Thermometer 15 mL of isopropyl alcohol–water mixture nyserda.ny.gov/School-Power-Naturally Stirring rod Graduated cylinder Grease pencil or marker 4 paper strips, 10 cm x 1 cm 60 cm rubber tubing SAFETY Students should be made familiar with proper laboratory safety procedures including the location of fire extinguishers, fire blankets, and safety showers (where available). Instruct students regarding the proper and safe use of Bunsen burners and matches, and stress the importance of keeping the volatile components of the fractional distillation away from the flame during the collection of distillates.
    [Show full text]
  • Concept Papers for Changes to Rule 9-1 -- Refinery Fuel Gas Sulfur
    Draft: 05‐14‐15 Appendix C: Concept Paper for Changes to Rule 9‐1: Refinery Fuel Gas Sulfur Limits Rules to Be Amended or Drafted Regulation of refinery fuel gas (RFG) requires amendments to Air District Regulation 9, Rule 1, Sulfur Dioxide. Goals The goal of this rulemaking is to achieve technically feasible and cost‐effective sulfur dioxide (SO2) emission reductions from RFG systems at Bay Area refineries. Background The lightest components of crude oil separated by a refinery’s atmospheric fractionator are methane and ethane, which are also the primary components of natural gas. At petroleum refineries, these products are not produced in marketable quantities, but are used as fuel in the numerous onsite steam generators and process heaters. When produced at a refinery, this product is called refinery fuel gas (RFG). Pipeline natural gas may be used as a supplemental fuel when needed to enhance the quality of RFG or when there is not enough RFG available. Unlike, pipeline natural gas, refinery fuel gas often contains significant quantities of sulfur that occur naturally in crude oil. When burned, these sulfur compounds are converted to SO2. Process and Source Description RFG can contain between a few hundred and a few thousand parts per million‐volume (ppmv) sulfur in the form of hydrogen sulfide (H2S), carbonyl sulfide (COS), and organic sulfur compounds, such as mercaptans. During combustion, the sulfur in all of these compounds will oxidize to form SO2, which is a criteria air pollutant and a precursor to particulate matter. Scrubbing with an amine or caustic solution can be effective at removing H2S and some acidic sulfur containing compounds, but is generally ineffective at removing nonacidic sulfur compounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG)
    Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) Demand, Supply and Future Perspectives for Sudan Synthesis report of a workshop held in Khartoum, 12-13 December 2010 The workshop was funded by UKaid from the Department for International Development Cover image: © UNAMID / Albert Gonzalez Farran This report is available online at: www.unep.org/sudan Disclaimer The material in this report does not necessarily represent the views of any of the organisations involved in the preparation and hosting of the workshop. It must be noted that some time has passed between the workshop and the dissemination of this report, during which some important changes have taken place, not least of which is the independence of South Sudan, a fact which greatly affects the national energy context. Critically, following the independence, the rate of deforestation in the Republic of Sudan has risen from 0.7% per year to 2.2% per year, making many of the discussions within this document all the more relevant. Whilst not directly affecting the production of LPG, which is largely derived from oil supplies north of the border with South Sudan, the wider context of the economics of the energy sector, and the economy as a whole, have changed. These changes are not reflected in this document. This being said, it is strongly asserted that this document still represents a useful contribution to the energy sector, particularly given its contribution to charting the breadth of perspectives on LPG in the Republic of Sudan. Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) Demand, Supply and Future Perspectives for Sudan Synthesis report of a workshop held in Khartoum, 12-13 December 2010 A joint publication by: Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Physical Development – Sudan, Ministry of Petroleum – Sudan, United Kingdom Department for International Development, United Nations Development Programme and United Nations Environment Programme Table of contents Acronyms and abbreviations .
    [Show full text]
  • CCS: Applications and Opportunities for the Oil and Gas Industry
    Brief CCS: Applications and Opportunities for the Oil and Gas Industry Guloren Turan, General Manager, Advocacy and Communications May 2020 Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Applications of CCS in the oil and gas industry ............................................................................. 2 3. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Page | 1 1. Introduction Production and consumption of oil and gas currently account for over half of global greenhouse gas emissions associated with energy use1 and so it is imperative that the oil and gas industry reduces its emissions to meet the net-zero ambition. At the same time, the industry has also been the source and catalyst of the leading innovations in clean energy, which includes carbon capture and storage (CCS). Indeed, as oil and gas companies are evolving their business models in the context of the energy transition, CCS has started to feature more prominently in their strategies and investments. CCS is versatile technology that can support the oil and gas industry’s low-carbon transition in several ways. Firstly, CCS is a key enabler of emission reductions in the industries’ operations, whether for compliance reasons, to meet self-imposed performance targets or to benefit from CO2 markets. Secondly, spurred by investor and ESG community sentiment, the industry is looking to reduce the carbon footprint of its products when used in industry, since about 90% of emissions associated with oil and gas come from the ultimate combustion of hydrocarbons – their scope 3 emissions. Finally, CCS can be a driver of new business lines, such as clean power generation and clean hydrogen production. From the perspective of the Paris Agreement, however, the deployment of CCS globally remains off track.
    [Show full text]
  • Facts About Alberta's Oil Sands and Its Industry
    Facts about Alberta’s oil sands and its industry CONTENTS Oil Sands Discovery Centre Facts 1 Oil Sands Overview 3 Alberta’s Vast Resource The biggest known oil reserve in the world! 5 Geology Why does Alberta have oil sands? 7 Oil Sands 8 The Basics of Bitumen 10 Oil Sands Pioneers 12 Mighty Mining Machines 15 Cyrus the Bucketwheel Excavator 1303 20 Surface Mining Extraction 22 Upgrading 25 Pipelines 29 Environmental Protection 32 In situ Technology 36 Glossary 40 Oil Sands Projects in the Athabasca Oil Sands 44 Oil Sands Resources 48 OIL SANDS DISCOVERY CENTRE www.oilsandsdiscovery.com OIL SANDS DISCOVERY CENTRE FACTS Official Name Oil Sands Discovery Centre Vision Sharing the Oil Sands Experience Architects Wayne H. Wright Architects Ltd. Owner Government of Alberta Minister The Honourable Lindsay Blackett Minister of Culture and Community Spirit Location 7 hectares, at the corner of MacKenzie Boulevard and Highway 63 in Fort McMurray, Alberta Building Size Approximately 27,000 square feet, or 2,300 square metres Estimated Cost 9 million dollars Construction December 1983 – December 1984 Opening Date September 6, 1985 Updated Exhibit Gallery opened in September 2002 Facilities Dr. Karl A. Clark Exhibit Hall, administrative area, children’s activity/education centre, Robert Fitzsimmons Theatre, mini theatre, gift shop, meeting rooms, reference room, public washrooms, outdoor J. Howard Pew Industrial Equipment Garden, and Cyrus Bucketwheel Exhibit. Staffing Supervisor, Head of Marketing and Programs, Senior Interpreter, two full-time Interpreters, administrative support, receptionists/ cashiers, seasonal interpreters, and volunteers. Associated Projects Bitumount Historic Site Programs Oil Extraction demonstrations, Quest for Energy movie, Paydirt film, Historic Abasand Walking Tour (summer), special events, self-guided tours of the Exhibit Hall.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.BIODEGRADATION of CRUDE OIL by Pseudomonas
    Tecnología Química ISSN: 0041-8420 [email protected] Universidad de Oriente Cuba Pérez Silva, Rosa M.; Ábalos Rodríguez, Arelis; Gómez Montes de Oca, José M.; Cantero Moreno, Domingo BIODEGRADATION OF CRUDE OIL BY Pseudomonas aeruginosa AT18 STRAIN Tecnología Química, vol. XXVI, núm. 1, enero-abril, 2006, pp. 70-77 Universidad de Oriente Santiago de Cuba, Cuba Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=445543749010 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative BIODEGRADATION OF CRUDE OIL BY Pseudomonas aeruginosa AT18 STRAIN Rosa M. Pérez Silva1; Arelis Ábalos Rodríguez2*; José M. Gómez Montes de Oca1, Domingo Cantero Moreno1 1Department of Chemical Engineering Technology, Food Technology and Environmental Technologies, Faculty of Sciences, University of Cadiz, Campus Rio San Pedro, 11510 Puerto Real (Cadiz), Spain 2Centro de Estudios de Biotecnología Industrial. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales. Universidad de Oriente. Santiago de Cuba, Cuba The bioremediation of hydrocarbons in contaminated soils by Pseudomonas aeruginosa AT18 strain grow on crude oil, lubricant oil, naphthalene, toluene and, kerosene as unique carbon source and energy was isolated from samples soil contaminated with crude oil on Petroleum Refinery Hnos Díaz in Santiago de Cuba city. The biodegradative activity of the strain achieved 81% with the mixture Mesa 30/Puerto Escondido (8:2) crude oil. Key words: biodegradation, Pseudomonas aeruginosa. _____________________ Pseudomonas aeruginosa AT18, es capaz de usar hidrocarburos del petróleo como fuente de carbono y energía para su metabolismo.
    [Show full text]
  • Refining Company Perspective & Approach to High Quality Binders
    June 18, 2019 Refining company perspective & approach to high quality asphalts Pavel Kriz, Ph.D., P.Eng. Americas Asphalt Group & Discipline Technical Leader This communication may contain confidential information for the use of the entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you are the intended recipient, information may not be reproduced or further distributed out of your organization without the originator's authorization in writing. 2019 © Imperial Oil Limited. All rights reserved. Imperial & ExxonMobil: Funding Members of Asphalt Institute 2 Global Asphalt Operations In NA Imperial & ExxonMobil manufacture asphalt at Joliet, Billings, Nanticoke & Strathcona Refineries • Produce over 2MTa of premium asphalt • Utilize high quality WestCan crudes • Committed to product quality & integrity Sarnia Technology Applications & Research • Canada’s first & largest petroleum research est. 1924 • 700+ patents • ~40+ PhDs out of ~100 employees • Global Centre of Excellence for Asphalt Asphalt Production • Long heritage & deep expertise in asphalt research Asphalt Technology/R&D 3 Crude Oil • “Crude oil is a naturally occurring, yellowish-black liquid found in geological formations beneath the Earth's surface” • It is a mixture of a large number of different hydrocarbons • Each oil has a unique mix of molecules, which define its properties, like color and viscosity Composition by weight Element Percent range Carbon 83 to 85% Hydrogen 10 to 14% Nitrogen 0.1 to 2% Oxygen 0.05 to 1.5% Sulphur 0.05 to 6.0% Metals < 0.1% 4 Crude Oil Origin 5 Crude Oil Reservoir Saturated porous reservoir rock Impermeable layers (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire from Ice
    SYSTEM FAILURE CASE STUDY NOVEMBER 2009 VOLUME 3 ISSUE 08 Fire From Ice February 16, 2007: Propane gas leaked from the McKee Refinery’s Propane Deasphalting Unit in Sunray, Texas. As winds carried the vapor cloud, a spark ignited the propane and the entire cloud burst into flames. The fire spread quickly, forcing an evacuation of the refinery as firefighters battled the blaze. Three workers suffered serious burns and the refinery was shut down for two months. Gas prices increased 9 cents per gallon in the west. BACKGROUND Industrial Overview hamrock Oil and Gas built the McKee Refinery outside Sunray, Texas in 1933. The refinery Sunderwent major modifications in the 1950s and 1990s. Valero acquired the refinery in 2001 and further Figure 1: The Refinery Fire upgraded it in 2004. By 2005, Valero was the largest refiner in North America, with eighteen refineries producing 3.3 million barrels per day. The McKee Refinery contributed WHAT HAPPENED? about 170,000 barrels per day to Valero’s overall production. In February 2007, a four-day cold front froze the water in the PROPANE DEASPHALTING (PDA) UNIT dead-leg pipe, causing it to expand, and crack the pipe. Ice One part of the refinery is the Propane Deasphalting (PDA) blocked the crack and prevented any propane from exiting. Unit, where high-pressure propane serves as a solvent to recover fuel and asphalt from crude oil residues. In 1992, February 16, 2007: Freezing water cracked an the refinery shut down a control station in the PDA unit. idle section of pipe causing a propane gas Rather than remove the idle subsection, or isolate it with slip 1 release.
    [Show full text]
  • Refinery Processing of Asphalt Cement
    Transportation Research Record 999 1 Refinery Processing of Asphalt Cement LUKE W. CORBETT ABSTRACT BOSCAN ARABIAN NIGERIA VENEZUELA HEAVY ___h!Qfil_ API Degrees ~ ~ 38.1 SP. Gravity .999 .886 .834 Crude petroleum varies in its makeup of dis­ % Sulfur 6-4 2.8 0.2 tillable fractions as well as in its bitumen content. Initially, it is separated by dis­ tillation with the major volume of asphalt Gasoline cement manufactured today prepared by Keroslne 1--~-<-.... straight reduction to grade. Other process­ Lt. Gas Oil ,___ .,. .,_ ing methods, such as solvent deasphalting, supercritical extraction, blending, and con­ Hv ~ Gas OHS tinuous air-blowing, supply fractions that are usable in asphalt cement within the limitations of specification compliance. Bitumen Crude oils may be arbitrarily classified Residuum according to their API (American Petroleum Institute) gravity, which is shown to relate to composition, physical properties, and the viscosity-penetration relationship of the asphalt cement therefrom. It is also related FIGURE 1 Make-up of crude petroleum. to distillation cut-points and how that crude might best be processed. The viscos­ ity-penetration relationship is shown to distillable overhead fractions with a high percent­ correlate with temperature susceptibility age of bitumen, whereas the high API gravity crudes and may be used directly in determining contain a relatively high percentage of overhead specification compliance. The viscosity fraction with a low percentage of bitumen. The low graded (Table 2) specifications as used in gravity crudes are generally referred to as heavy the United States are more rational than the crudes or as sour crudes if their sulfur content is penetration-softening point control systems high.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Exposure to Benzene and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons at Two Oil Refineries 1977–2014
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Managing Exposure to Benzene and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons at Two Oil Refineries 1977–2014 Tapani Tuomi *, Henna Veijalainen and Tiina Santonen Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH), Topeliuksenkatu 41 B, P.O. Box 40, Työterveyslaitos, FI-00032 Helsinki, Finland; henna.veijalainen@ttl.fi (H.V.); tiina.santonen@ttl.fi (T.S.) * Correspondence: tapani.tuomi@ttl.fi; Tel.: +358-9-4747-2926 Received: 15 December 2017; Accepted: 18 January 2018; Published: 24 January 2018 Abstract: Air concentrations of and inhalation exposure to total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and benzene was monitored separately at two oil refineries from 1977 to 2014. Prevention policies and control measures that may explain changes were surveyed. The aim was to evaluate how the application of of Occupational Health and Safety Assessment Series OHSAS 18001.04 principles as well as Environmental protection Agency EPA and European Oil Company Organisation for Environment, Health and Safety CONCAWE practices have influenced air concentrations. Benzene air concentrations declined in 11 of 17 units, six of which were associated with declining exposures. Benzene air concentrations declined across all units on average by 46%. This amounts to an average yearly decline of 1.7%. TPH air concentrations declined in 10 of 17 units, seven of which were associated with declining exposures. The average decline in TPH air concentrations was 49%, corresponding to 1.3% per year. As a result, average working day exposure in 10 of 17 units have declined significantly and today, benzene and TPH exposure in most units are well below 10% of the current Occupational Exposure Limit (OEL8h:s).
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental, Health, and Safety Guidelines for Petroleum Refining
    ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH, AND SAFETY GUIDELINES PETROLEUM REFINING November 17, 2016 ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH, AND SAFETY GUIDELINES FOR PETROLEUM REFINING INTRODUCTION 1. The Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS) Guidelines are technical reference documents with general and industry-specific examples of Good International Industry Practice (GIIP).1 When one or more members of the World Bank Group are involved in a project, these EHS Guidelines are applied as required by their respective policies and standards. These industry sector EHS Guidelines are designed to be used together with the General EHS Guidelines document, which provides guidance to users on common EHS issues potentially applicable to all industry sectors. For complex projects, use of multiple industry sector guidelines may be necessary. A complete list of industry sector guidelines can be found at: www.ifc.org/ehsguidelines. 2. The EHS Guidelines contain the performance levels and measures that are generally considered to be achievable in new facilities by existing technology at reasonable costs. Application of the EHS Guidelines to existing facilities may involve the establishment of site-specific targets, with an appropriate timetable for achieving them. 3. The applicability of the EHS Guidelines should be tailored to the hazards and risks established for each project on the basis of the results of an environmental assessment in which site-specific variables— such as host country context, assimilative capacity of the environment, and other project factors—are taken into account. The applicability of specific technical recommendations should be based on the professional opinion of qualified and experienced persons. 4. When host country regulations differ from the levels and measures presented in the EHS Guidelines, projects are expected to achieve whichever is more stringent.
    [Show full text]