Provincial Summary Report Province 2 GOVERNMENT of NEPAL

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Provincial Summary Report Province 2 GOVERNMENT of NEPAL National Economic Census 2018 GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Economic Census 2018 Provincial Summary Report Province 2 Provincial Summary Report Provincial National Planning Commission Province 2 Province Central Bureau of Statistics Kathmandu, Nepal August 2019 GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Economic Census 2018 Provincial Summary Report Province 2 National Planning Commission Central Bureau of Statistics Kathmandu, Nepal August 2019 Published by: Central Bureau of Statistics Address: Ramshahpath, Thapathali, Kathmandu, Nepal. Phone: +977-1-4100524, 4245947 Fax: +977-1-4227720 P.O. Box No: 11031 E-mail: [email protected] ISBN: 978-9937-0-6359-3 Contents Page Map of Administrative Area in Nepal by Province and District……………….………1 Figures at a Glance…………………………………………...........................................3 Number of Establishments and Persons Engaged by Province and District....................5 Brief Outline of National Economic Census 2018 (NEC2018) of Nepal........................7 Concepts and Definitions of NEC2018...........................................................................11 Map of Administrative Area in Province 2 by District and Municipality…...................17 Table 1. Number of Establishments and Persons Engaged by Sex and Local Unit……19 Table 2. Number of Establishments by Size of Persons Engaged and Local Unit…….26 Table 3. Number of Establishments by Section of Industrial Classification and Local Unit………………………………………………………………...32 Table 4. Number of Person Engaged by Section of Industrial Classification and Local Unit………………………………………………………………...44 Table 5. Number of Establishments and Person Engaged by Whether Registered or not at any Ministries or Agencies and Local Unit……………..………..…56 Table 6. Number of establishments by Working Hours per Day and Local Unit……...62 Table 7. Number of Establishments by Year of Starting the Business and Local Unit………………………………………………………………...68 Table 8. Number of Establishments by Kind of Business Place and Local Unit………74 Table 9. Number of Establishments by Whether Keep Accounting Record or Not and Local Unit…………………………………………………………….......86 Appendices Appendix 1: Coverage of National Economic Census 2018……………....................95 Appendix 2: List of Main Officials for National Economic Census 2018...................96 Map of Administrative Areas in Nepal by Province and District 603 703 702 704 701 602 Sudurpashchim Province 705 604 706 605 707 601 Karnali Province 709 403 606 607 708 608 501 402 610 404 512 609 Gandaki Province 502 411 405 406 401 410 511 503 303 Province 5 504 409 510 407 304 505 302 506 305 301 408 306 103 509 508 307 Province 3 101 507 313 312 308 309 102 310 104 208 311 Province 1 108 109 105 207 Province 2 106 206 205 107 204 114 110 203 202 113 112 201 111 Legend International Boundary Provincial Boundary District Boundary 000 DistrictRiver Code 000 District Code Code of Province / District 1 PROVINCE 1 3 PROVINCE 3 5 PROVINCE 5 7 SUDURPASHCHIM PROVINCE 101 Taplejung 301 Dolakha 501 Rukum East 701 Bajura 102 Sankhuwasabha 302 Sindhupalchok 502 Rolpa 702 Bajhang 103 Solukhumbu 303 Rasuwa 503 Pyuthan 703 Darchula 104 Okhaldhunga 304 Dhading 504 Gulmi 704 Baitadi 105 Khotang 305 Nuwakot 505 Arghakhanchi 705 Dadeldhura 106 Bhojpur 306 Kathmandu 506 Palpa 706 Doti 107 Dhankuta 307 Bhaktapur 507 Nawalparasi West 707 Achham 108 Terhathum 308 Lalitpur 508 Rupandehi 708 Kailali 109 Panchthar 309 Kavrepalanchok 509 Kapilbastu 709 Kanchanpur 110 Ilam 310 Ramechhap 510 Dang 111 Jhapa 311 Sindhuli 511 Banke 112 Morang 312 Makwanpur 512 Bardiya 113 Sunsari 313 Chitawan 114 Udayapur 6 KARNALI PROVINCE 4 GANDAKI PROVINCE 601 Dolpa 2 PROVINCE 2 401 Gorkha 602 Mugu 201 Saptari 402 Manang 603 Humla 202 Siraha 403 Mustang 604 Jumla 203 Dhanusa 404 Myagdi 605 Kalikot 204 Mahottari 405 Kaski 606 Dailekh 205 Sarlahi 406 Lamjung 607 Jajarkot 206 Rautahat 407 Tanahu 608 Rukum West 207 Bara 408 Nawalparasi East 609 Salyan 208 Parsa 409 Syangja 610 Surkhet 410 Parbat 411 Baglung * Codes and boundaries are as of November 2, 2017. 1 2 Final Results of National Economic Census 2018 of Nepal (1/2) Figures at a Glance Number of Provinces 1) 7 Number of Districts 1) 77 Number of Metropolitan Cities 1) 6 (maha-nagarpalika) Number of Sub-metropolitan Cities 1) 11 (upa-maha nagarpalika) Number of Municipalities 1) 276 (nagarpalika) Number of Rural Municipalities 1) 460 (gaunpalika) Number of Wards 1) 6,743 Number of Establishments 923,356 Registered 462,605 establishments 50.1 % Not registered 460,422 establishments 49.9 % Female manager 273,436 persons 29.6 % Female owner 247,880 persons 29.8 % 2) Young manager 3) 498,646 persons 54.0 % Young owner 450,464 persons 54.5 % 2) Foreign owner 10,265 persons 1.2 % 2) 1) The final results are sorted out based on the new administrative areas as of 14 April 2018. 2) Excludes "Not applicable", "Not stated", "Unknown", and others from the denominator. 3) Young managers (or owners) mean those who are under 40 years old, herein. 3 (2/2) Number of Establishments (continued) 923,356 New establishments 4) 394,219 establishments 42.7 % Owned (Building/Room) 400,848 establishments 46.7 % 2) Rented (Building/Room) 426,380 establishments 49.7 % 2) Street business 34,101 establishments 3.7 % Home business 386,323 establishments 41.8 % Area of business place (building/room) 2 2 Under 100ft (9.3m ) 172,985 establishments 20.8 % 2) Single unit 898,996 establishments 97.4 % Number of Entities 5) 900,924 entities No accounting record 472,350 entities 52.4 % Number of Persons Engaged 3,228,457 persons Number of Persons Engaged 3.5 per Establishment 2) Excludes "Not applicable", "Not stated", "Unknown", and others from the denominator. 4) New establishments mean which started business between April 2015 and April 2018. 5) An entity consists of a single unit or a head office only. 4 Number of Establishments and Persons Engaged by Province and District Province Code Number of Persons Engaged District Code Number of Establishments District Name Total Male Female (establishments) (persons) (persons) (persons) Nepal 923,356 3,228,457 2,012,237 1,216,220 Province 1 168,518 544,079 324,037 220,042 Province 2 117,670 354,994 268,279 86,715 Province 3 282,920 1,218,497 731,783 486,714 Gandaki Province 100,684 332,472 185,400 147,072 Province 5 147,789 474,264 306,892 167,372 Karnali Province 42,807 118,951 70,814 48,137 Sudurpashchim Povince 62,968 185,200 125,032 60,168 1 01 Taplejung 4,650 11,573 6,699 4,874 1 02 Sankhuwasabha 6,038 19,227 10,850 8,377 1 03 Solukhumbu 3,508 19,134 9,706 9,428 1 04 Okhaldhunga 4,346 22,031 10,290 11,741 1 05 Khotang 4,308 11,314 6,645 4,669 1 06 Bhojpur 4,074 10,362 5,878 4,484 1 07 Dhankuta 5,997 15,820 8,685 7,135 1 08 Terhathum 3,412 8,955 5,045 3,910 1 09 Panchthar 5,437 13,534 7,661 5,873 1 10 Ilam 9,661 26,804 15,113 11,691 1 11 Jhapa 38,789 116,837 68,890 47,947 1 12 Morang 35,247 127,887 83,275 44,612 1 13 Sunsari 31,536 112,708 69,021 43,687 1 14 Udayapur 11,515 27,893 16,279 11,614 2 01 Saptari 16,295 42,252 28,598 13,654 2 02 Siraha 13,137 40,513 29,101 11,412 2 03 Dhanusa 17,965 56,475 43,273 13,202 2 04 Mahottari 14,049 36,998 28,161 8,837 2 05 Sarlahi 15,260 38,657 27,931 10,726 2 06 Rautahat 12,790 41,265 32,117 9,148 2 07 Bara 12,449 48,724 38,279 10,445 2 08 Parsa 15,725 50,110 40,819 9,291 3 01 Dolakha 6,758 22,331 13,122 9,209 3 02 Sindhupalchok 9,076 32,949 17,726 15,223 3 03 Rasuwa 1,372 4,174 2,420 1,754 3 04 Dhading 12,051 55,521 29,639 25,882 3 05 Nuwakot 8,794 30,129 18,073 12,056 3 06 Kathmandu 125,047 590,002 362,162 227,840 3 07 Bhaktapur 19,631 86,296 49,901 36,395 3 08 Lalitpur 27,009 134,408 81,507 52,901 3 09 Kavrepalanchok 14,282 54,575 32,650 21,925 3 10 Ramechhap 5,621 22,818 12,273 10,545 3 11 Sindhuli 8,001 34,085 19,779 14,306 3 12 Makwanpur 16,041 46,582 29,014 17,568 3 13 Chitawan 29,237 104,627 63,517 41,110 5 Province Code Number of Persons Engaged District Code Number of Establishments District Name Total Male Female (establishments) (persons) (persons) (persons) 4 01 Gorkha 10,972 30,423 16,831 13,592 4 02 Manang 487 1,695 979 716 4 03 Mustang 775 3,106 1,777 1,329 4 04 Myagdi 5,063 16,652 8,498 8,154 4 05 Kaski 30,745 111,818 65,901 45,917 4 06 Lamjung 6,411 29,395 15,353 14,042 4 07 Tanahu 12,433 36,686 19,652 17,034 4 08 Nawalparasi East 12,745 38,396 22,053 16,343 4 09 Syangja 7,410 20,946 11,019 9,927 4 10 Parbat 4,720 12,983 7,182 5,801 4 11 Baglung 8,923 30,372 16,155 14,217 5 01 Rukum East 1,020 2,602 1,463 1,139 5 02 Rolpa 5,094 15,456 7,566 7,890 5 03 Pyuthan 5,606 21,373 11,938 9,435 5 04 Gulmi 9,548 22,876 13,071 9,805 5 05 Arghakhanchi 6,619 14,613 8,768 5,845 5 06 Palpa 8,701 24,902 14,088 10,814 5 07 Nawalparasi West 11,208 43,866 26,774 17,092 5 08 Rupandehi 38,403 134,772 94,357 40,415 5 09 Kapilbastu 13,607 40,610 30,742 9,868 5 10 Dang 14,421 47,598 28,847 18,751 5 11 Banke 18,666 64,882 44,333 20,549 5 12 Bardiya 14,896 40,714 24,945 15,769 6 01 Dolpa 860 3,225 1,982 1,243 6 02 Mugu 1,782 5,849 2,957 2,892 6 03 Humla 2,016 5,739 3,752 1,987 6 04 Jumla 3,078 8,463 5,235 3,228 6 05 Kalikot 3,535 9,200 5,957 3,243 6 06 Dailekh 6,308 14,874 8,967 5,907 6 07 Jajarkot 3,316 8,494 5,326 3,168 6 08 Rukum West 3,994 10,180 6,103 4,077 6 09 Salyan 6,098 17,019 9,829 7,190 6 10 Surkhet 11,820 35,908 20,706 15,202 7 01 Bajura 3,891 8,859 5,905 2,954 7 02 Bajhang 6,219 15,446 10,363 5,083 7 03 Darchula 3,413 10,837 7,354 3,483 7 04 Baitadi 4,395 12,268 8,858 3,410 7 05 Dadeldhura 4,054 11,469 7,938 3,531 7 06 Doti 3,667 9,826 6,571 3,255 7 07 Achham 4,284 13,680 9,494 4,186 7 08 Kailali 21,544 66,753 43,501 23,252 7 09 Kanchanpur 11,501 36,062 25,048 11,014 6 Brief Outline of National Economic Census 2018 (NEC2018) of Nepal 1.1.
Recommended publications
  • Code Under Name Girls Boys Total Girls Boys Total 010290001
    P|D|LL|S G8 G10 Code Under Name Girls Boys Total Girls Boys Total 010290001 Maiwakhola Gaunpalika Patidanda Ma Vi 15 22 37 25 17 42 010360002 Meringden Gaunpalika Singha Devi Adharbhut Vidyalaya 8 2 10 0 0 0 010370001 Mikwakhola Gaunpalika Sanwa Ma V 27 26 53 50 19 69 010160009 Phaktanglung Rural Municipality Saraswati Chyaribook Ma V 28 10 38 33 22 55 010060001 Phungling Nagarpalika Siddhakali Ma V 11 14 25 23 8 31 010320004 Phungling Nagarpalika Bhanu Jana Ma V 88 77 165 120 130 250 010320012 Phungling Nagarpalika Birendra Ma V 19 18 37 18 30 48 010020003 Sidingba Gaunpalika Angepa Adharbhut Vidyalaya 5 6 11 0 0 0 030410009 Deumai Nagarpalika Janta Adharbhut Vidyalaya 19 13 32 0 0 0 030100003 Phakphokthum Gaunpalika Janaki Ma V 13 5 18 23 9 32 030230002 Phakphokthum Gaunpalika Singhadevi Adharbhut Vidyalaya 7 7 14 0 0 0 030230004 Phakphokthum Gaunpalika Jalpa Ma V 17 25 42 25 23 48 030330008 Phakphokthum Gaunpalika Khambang Ma V 5 4 9 1 2 3 030030001 Ilam Municipality Amar Secondary School 26 14 40 62 48 110 030030005 Ilam Municipality Barbote Basic School 9 9 18 0 0 0 030030011 Ilam Municipality Shree Saptamai Gurukul Sanskrit Vidyashram Secondary School 0 17 17 1 12 13 030130001 Ilam Municipality Purna Smarak Secondary School 16 15 31 22 20 42 030150001 Ilam Municipality Adarsha Secondary School 50 60 110 57 41 98 030460003 Ilam Municipality Bal Kanya Ma V 30 20 50 23 17 40 030460006 Ilam Municipality Maheshwor Adharbhut Vidyalaya 12 15 27 0 0 0 030070014 Mai Nagarpalika Kankai Ma V 50 44 94 99 67 166 030190004 Maijogmai Gaunpalika
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Soil Mapping in the Bara District of Nepal Using Kriging Tool in Arcgis
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications Agronomy and Horticulture Department 10-26-2018 Digital soil mapping in the Bara district of Nepal using kriging tool in ArcGIS Dinesh Panday University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Bijesh Maharjan University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Devraj Chalise Nepal Agricultural Research Council Ram Kumar Shrestha Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Lamjung, Nepal Bikesh Twanabasu Westfalische Wilhelms Universitat, Munster Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronomyfacpub Part of the Agricultural Science Commons, Agriculture Commons, Agronomy and Crop Sciences Commons, Botany Commons, Horticulture Commons, Other Plant Sciences Commons, and the Plant Biology Commons Panday, Dinesh; Maharjan, Bijesh; Chalise, Devraj; Shrestha, Ram Kumar; and Twanabasu, Bikesh, "Digital soil mapping in the Bara district of Nepal using kriging tool in ArcGIS" (2018). Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications. 1130. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronomyfacpub/1130 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Agronomy and Horticulture Department at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. RESEARCH ARTICLE Digital soil mapping in the Bara district of Nepal using kriging tool in ArcGIS 1 1 2 3 Dinesh PandayID *, Bijesh Maharjan , Devraj Chalise , Ram Kumar Shrestha , Bikesh Twanabasu4,5 1 Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States of America, 2 Nepal Agricultural Research Council, Lalitpur, Nepal, 3 Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Lamjung Campus, Lamjung, Nepal, 4 Hexa International Pvt.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveillance System in Nepal
    IED threat in Nepal Geneva 16- 19, 2015 Nepal Nepal was declared minefield free in 201 IEDs continue to injure and kill people in Nepal Device-wise Casualties by Victim -activated Explosions (90% casualties from IEDs: 2006-2014) © UNICEF/NEPIMAGE 01299/ H LAURENGE IEDs – Smaller © UNICEF/NEPIMAGE 01277/ H LAURENGE IEDs replaced guns and fire arms in Nepal © UN EOC NEPAL IEDs - bigger © UN EOC NEPAL UNICEF/NEPIMAGE 01265/ H LAURENGE UNICEF/NEPIMAGE 01263/ H LAURENGE © © © UNICEF/NEPIMAGE 01237/ H LAURENGE IEDs IEDs – much bigger © UNICEF/NEPIMAGE 01283/ H LAURENGE IED – not anti-vehicle mine 38 people died and 78 were injured © SDC/NEPAL/ T NGUDUP Command Detonated Devices Surveillance system in Nepal • 2005: Development of a Media-based Surveillance System on Victim-Activated Explosions in 75 districts • 2006: Transformed into a Community-based active Surveillance System • 2008: Expanded to Intentional Explosions • 2009: Expanded to all types of Armed Violence (including: small arms, mines, ERW and other IEDs) The term 'Surveillance' as used in the public health field, refers to the ongoing and systematic collection, analysis, interpretation and dissemination of health information. Surveillance system and MRE, VA and IEDD Who Target populations How many Severity/Justification Where Geographic targeting Why Appropriate messages What Type of devices Surveillance When Time pattern Prioritization ! ISS and Mine Risk Education 2005-07 2008-2011 2008-2011 2012-13 LAURENGE UNICEF/NEPIMAGE 01260/ H UNICEF/NEPIMAGE © © ‘Socket Bomb’ ‘Sutali Bomb’
    [Show full text]
  • Social Organization District Coordination Co-Ordination Committee Parsa
    ORGANISATION PROFILE 2020 SODCC SOCIAL ORGANIZATION DISTRICT COORDINATION COMMITTEE, PARSA 1 | P a g e District Background Parsa district is situated in central development region of Terai. It is a part of Province No. 2 in Central Terai and is one of the seventy seven districts of Nepal. The district shares its boundary with Bara in the east, Chitwan in the west and Bihar (India) in the south and west. There are 10 rural municipalities, 3 municipalities, 1 metropolitan, 4 election regions and 8 province assembly election regions in Parsa district. The total area of this district is 1353 square kilometers. There are 15535 houses built. Parsa’s population counted over six hundred thousand people in 2011, 48% of whom women. There are 67,843 children under five in the district, 61,998 adolescent girls (10-19), 141,635 women of reproductive age (15 to 49), and 39,633 seniors (aged 60 and above). A large share (83%) of Parsa’s population is Hindu, 14% are Muslim, 2% Buddhist, and smaller shares of other religions’. The people of Parsa district are self- depend in agriculture. It means agriculture is the main occupation of the people of Parsa. 63% is the literacy rate of Parsa where 49% of women and 77% of Men can read and write. Introduction of SODCC Parsa Social Organization District Coordination Committee Parsa (SODCC Parsa) is reputed organization in District, which especially has been working for the cause of Children and women in 8 districts of Province 2. It has established in 1994 and registered in District Administration office Parsa and Social Welfare Council under the act of Government of Nepal in 2053 BS (AD1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Forests and Watershed Profile of Local Level (744) Structure of Nepal
    Forests and Watershed Profile of Local Level (744) Structure of Nepal Volumes: Volume I : Forest & Watershed Profile of Province 1 Volume II : Forest & Watershed Profile of Province 2 Volume III : Forest & Watershed Profile of Province 3 Volume IV : Forest & Watershed Profile of Province 4 Volume V : Forest & Watershed Profile of Province 5 Volume VI : Forest & Watershed Profile of Province 6 Volume VII : Forest & Watershed Profile of Province 7 Government of Nepal Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation Department of Forest Research and Survey Kathmandu July 2017 © Department of Forest Research and Survey, 2017 Any reproduction of this publication in full or in part should mention the title and credit DFRS. Citation: DFRS, 2017. Forests and Watershed Profile of Local Level (744) Structure of Nepal. Department of Forest Research and Survey (DFRS). Kathmandu, Nepal Prepared by: Coordinator : Dr. Deepak Kumar Kharal, DG, DFRS Member : Dr. Prem Poudel, Under-secretary, DSCWM Member : Rabindra Maharjan, Under-secretary, DoF Member : Shiva Khanal, Under-secretary, DFRS Member : Raj Kumar Rimal, AFO, DoF Member Secretary : Amul Kumar Acharya, ARO, DFRS Published by: Department of Forest Research and Survey P. O. Box 3339, Babarmahal Kathmandu, Nepal Tel: 977-1-4233510 Fax: 977-1-4220159 Email: [email protected] Web: www.dfrs.gov.np Cover map: Front cover: Map of Forest Cover of Nepal FOREWORD Forest of Nepal has been a long standing key natural resource supporting nation's economy in many ways. Forests resources have significant contribution to ecosystem balance and livelihood of large portion of population in Nepal. Sustainable management of forest resources is essential to support overall development goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Study Report on "Comminity Based Organizations(Cbos): Landscape
    Community Based Organizations (CBOs): Landscape, Capacity Assessment and Strengthening Strategy Study Report Prepared for PLAN Nepal Lalitpur, Nepal July, 2005 Democratizing civil society at grassroots SAGUN P.O. Box 7802, Kathmandu, Nepal Phone: 977 4247920, Fax: 9771 4229544 Email: [email protected] Community Based Organizations (CBOs): Landscape, Capacity Assessment and Strengthening Strategy Mukta S. Lama Suresh Dhakal Lagan Rai Study Report Prepared for PLAN Nepal Lalitpur, Nepal July, 2005 SAGUN P.O. Box 7802, Kathmandu, Nepal Phone: 977 4247920, Fax: 9771 4229544 Email: [email protected] ii Acknowledgements This report is a result of contribution of many people in multiple ways. Foremost, we extend our deepest and heartfelt gratitude to members of Community Based Organizations across the districts for sharing us with their time, insight and experiences. The study benefited greatly from support and cooperation of the Plan field staff and partner agencies in Sunsari, Morang, Makwanpur, Rautahat, Bara, and Banke districts and the Regional Operational Support Unit teams. We would like to thank Ms. Chhing Lamu Sherpa, Mr. Kalbhan Rai, Dr. Chandra K. Sen, Mr. R. P. Gupta and Krishna Ghimire for their valuable inputs on the study. Dr. Chandi Chapagai, Plan Nepal Country Training Coordinator deserves special thanks for coordinating the whole exercise. We would like to express our deep appreciation to Shobhakar Vaidhya for his keen interest, insightful comments and his enthusiasm for incorporating the learning into the institutional policies and procedures. Thanks are also due to the Ms. Minty Pande, Country Director for her encouragement and comments. Similarly we very much appreciate the support of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Government of Nepal Ministry of Forests and Environment Nepal
    Government of Nepal Ministry of Forests and Environment Nepal Forests for Prosperity Project Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) March 8, 2020 Executive Summary 1. This Environment and Social Management Framework (ESMF) has been prepared for the Forests for Prosperity (FFP) Project. The Project is implemented by the Ministry of Forest and Environment and funded by the World Bank as part of the Nepal’s Forest Investment Plan under the Forest Investment Program. The purpose of the Environmental and Social Management Framework is to provide guidance and procedures for screening and identification of expected environmental and social risks and impacts, developing management and monitoring plans to address the risks and to formulate institutional arrangements for managing these environmental and social risks under the project. 2. The Project Development Objective (PDO) is to improve sustainable forest management1; increase benefits from forests and contribute to net Greenhouse Gas Emission (GHG) reductions in selected municipalities in provinces 2 and 5 in Nepal. The short-to medium-term outcomes are expected to increase overall forest productivity and the forest sector’s contribution to Nepal’s economic growth and sustainable development including improved incomes and job creation in rural areas and lead to reduced Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions and increased climate resilience. This will directly benefit the communities, including women and disadvantaged groups participating in Community Based Forest Management (CBFM) as well and small and medium sized entrepreneurs (and their employees) involved in forest product harvesting, sale, transport and processing. Indirect benefits are improved forest cover, environmental services and carbon capture and storage 3. The FFP Project will increase the forest area under sustainable, community-based and productive forest management and under private smallholder plantations (mainly in the Terai), resulting in increased production of wood and non-wood forest products.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
    Chapter 3 Project Evaluation and Recommendations 3-1 Project Effect It is appropriate to implement the Project under Japan's Grant Aid Assistance, because the Project will have the following effects: (1) Direct Effects 1) Improvement of Educational Environment By replacing deteriorated classrooms, which are danger in structure, with rainwater leakage, and/or insufficient natural lighting and ventilation, with new ones of better quality, the Project will contribute to improving the education environment, which will be effective for improving internal efficiency. Furthermore, provision of toilets and water-supply facilities will greatly encourage the attendance of female teachers and students. Present(※) After Project Completion Usable classrooms in Target Districts 19,177 classrooms 21,707 classrooms Number of Students accommodated in the 709,410 students 835,820 students usable classrooms ※ Including the classrooms to be constructed under BPEP-II by July 2004 2) Improvement of Teacher Training Environment By constructing exclusive facilities for Resource Centres, the Project will contribute to activating teacher training and information-sharing, which will lead to improved quality of education. (2) Indirect Effects 1) Enhancement of Community Participation to Education Community participation in overall primary school management activities will be enhanced through participation in this construction project and by receiving guidance on various educational matters from the government. 91 3-2 Recommendations For the effective implementation of the project, it is recommended that HMG of Nepal take the following actions: 1) Coordination with other donors As and when necessary for the effective implementation of the Project, the DOE should ensure effective coordination with the CIP donors in terms of the CIP components including the allocation of target districts.
    [Show full text]
  • VBST Short List
    1 आिेदकको दर्ा ा न륍बर नागररकर्ा न륍बर नाम थायी जि쥍ला गा.वि.स. बािुको नाम ईभेꅍट ID 10002 2632 SUMAN BHATTARAI KATHMANDU KATHMANDU M.N.P. KEDAR PRASAD BHATTARAI 136880 10003 28733 KABIN PRAJAPATI BHAKTAPUR BHAKTAPUR N.P. SITA RAM PRAJAPATI 136882 10008 271060/7240/5583 SUDESH MANANDHAR KATHMANDU KATHMANDU M.N.P. SHREE KRISHNA MANANDHAR 136890 10011 9135 SAMERRR NAKARMI KATHMANDU KATHMANDU M.N.P. BASANTA KUMAR NAKARMI 136943 10014 407/11592 NANI MAYA BASNET DOLAKHA BHIMESWOR N.P. SHREE YAGA BAHADUR BASNET136951 10015 62032/450 USHA ADHIJARI KAVRE PANCHKHAL BHOLA NATH ADHIKARI 136952 10017 411001/71853 MANASH THAPA GULMI TAMGHAS KASHER BAHADUR THAPA 136954 10018 44874 RAJ KUMAR LAMICHHANE PARBAT TILAHAR KRISHNA BAHADUR LAMICHHANE136957 10021 711034/173 KESHAB RAJ BHATTA BAJHANG BANJH JANAK LAL BHATTA 136964 10023 1581 MANDEEP SHRESTHA SIRAHA SIRAHA N.P. KUMAR MAN SHRESTHA 136969 2 आिेदकको दर्ा ा न륍बर नागररकर्ा न륍बर नाम थायी जि쥍ला गा.वि.स. बािुको नाम ईभेꅍट ID 10024 283027/3 SHREE KRISHNA GHARTI LALITPUR GODAWARI DURGA BAHADUR GHARTI 136971 10025 60-01-71-00189 CHANDRA KAMI JUMLA PATARASI JAYA LAL KAMI 136974 10026 151086/205 PRABIN YADAV DHANUSHA MARCHAIJHITAKAIYA JAYA NARAYAN YADAV 136976 10030 1012/81328 SABINA NAGARKOTI KATHMANDU DAANCHHI HARI KRISHNA NAGARKOTI 136984 10032 1039/16713 BIRENDRA PRASAD GUPTABARA KARAIYA SAMBHU SHA KANU 136988 10033 28-01-71-05846 SURESH JOSHI LALITPUR LALITPUR U.M.N.P. RAJU JOSHI 136990 10034 331071/6889 BIJAYA PRASAD YADAV BARA RAUWAHI RAM YAKWAL PRASAD YADAV 136993 10036 071024/932 DIPENDRA BHUJEL DHANKUTA TANKHUWA LOCHAN BAHADUR BHUJEL 136996 10037 28-01-067-01720 SABIN K.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening the Role of Civil Society and Women in Democracy And
    HARIYO BAN PROGRAM Monitoring and Evaluation Plan 25 November 2011 – 25 August 2016 (Cooperative Agreement No: AID-367-A-11-00003) Submitted to: UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT NEPAL MISSION Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal Submitted by: WWF in partnership with CARE, FECOFUN and NTNC P.O. Box 7660, Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal First approved on April 18, 2013 Updated and approved on January 5, 2015 Updated and approved on July 31, 2015 Updated and approved on August 31, 2015 Updated and approved on January 19, 2016 January 19, 2016 Ms. Judy Oglethorpe Chief of Party, Hariyo Ban Program WWF Nepal Baluwatar, Kathmandu Subject: Approval for revised M&E Plan for the Hariyo Ban Program Reference: Cooperative Agreement # 367-A-11-00003 Dear Judy, This letter is in response to the updated Monitoring and Evaluation Plan (M&E Plan) for the Hariyo Program that you submitted to me on January 14, 2016. I would like to thank WWF and all consortium partners (CARE, NTNC, and FECOFUN) for submitting the updated M&E Plan. The revised M&E Plan is consistent with the approved Annual Work Plan and the Program Description of the Cooperative Agreement (CA). This updated M&E has added/revised/updated targets to systematically align additional earthquake recovery funding added into the award through 8th modification of Hariyo Ban award to WWF to address very unexpected and burning issues, primarily in four Hariyo Ban program districts (Gorkha, Dhading, Rasuwa and Nuwakot) and partly in other districts, due to recent earthquake and associated climatic/environmental challenges. This updated M&E Plan, including its added/revised/updated indicators and targets, will have very good programmatic meaning for the program’s overall performance monitoring process in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Budget Analysis of Ministry of Health and Population FY 2018/19
    Budget Analysis of Ministry of Health and Population FY 2018/19 Federal Ministry of Health and Population Policy Planning and Monitoring Division Government of Nepal September 2018 Recommended citation: FMoHP and NHSSP (2018). Budget Analysis of Ministry of Health and Population FY 2018/19. Federal Ministry of Health and Population and Nepal Health Sector Support Programme. Contributors: Dr. Bikash Devkota, Lila Raj Paudel, Muktinath Neupane, Hema Bhatt, Dr. Suresh Tiwari, Dhruba Raj Ghimire, and Dr. Bal Krishna Suvedi Disclaimer: All reasonable precautions have been taken by the Federal Ministry of Health and Population (FMoHP) and Nepal Health Sector Support Programme (NHSSP) to verify the information contained in this publication. However, this published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of this material lies with the reader. In no event shall the FMoHP and NHSSP be liable for damages arising from its use. For the further information write to Hema Bhatt at [email protected] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are grateful to all the officials and experts for giving their time to discuss budget allocation and expenditure patterns. We value the inputs from the Federal Ministry of Health and Population (FMoHP), Department of Health Services, Divisions, and Centres. The study team would like to acknowledge Dr Pushpa Chaudhary, Secretary FMoHP, for her overall guidance while finalising this budget analysis. We are thankful to Dr. Guna Raj Lohani, Director General, DoHS for his support. We are thankful to provincial government and sampled Palikas for their support in providing the information.
    [Show full text]