DOCSLIB.ORG

NWSI 10-1605, Storm Data Preparation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NWSI 10-1605, Storm Data Preparation Department of Commerce • National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration • National Weather Service NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE INSTRUCTION 10-1605 JULY 26, 2021 Performance and Evaluation, NWSPD 10-16 STORM DATA PREPARATION NOTICE: This publication is available at: http://www.nws.noaa.gov/directives/. OPR: W/COO11 (G. Strassberg) Certified by: W/COO1 (M. Sowko) Type of Issuance: Routine SUMMARY OF REVISIONS: This Directive supersedes National Weather Service Instruction (NWSI) 10-1605, dated July 16, 2018. The following changes were made: • Updated broken web links throughout the document. • Replaced references to casualties to fatalities/injuries for consistency. • Updated references to other NWS directives and made grammatical corrections. • Section 2.7 – Removed reference to using Verisk PCS for damage amounts. • Section 2.9.1 – Added policy guidance on reporting Flood, Flash Flood, and Debris Flow events, per Water Resources Services Branch. • Appendix A – Expanded definition and event narrative policy for reporting Debris Flow, and updated examples, per Water Resource Services Branch. • Appendix A – Updated reporting policy for Dust Storm events caused by thunderstorms, per Public and Severe Weather Programs. • Appendix A – Updated policy information for reporting Flash Flood events in Section 14.1, per Water Resources Services Branch. • Appendix A – Clarified Hail event sizes to be reported per Severe Weather Program. • Appendix A --Added policy to include reporting Snow Squalls in Winter Weather events, per Winter Weather Program. MURPHY.JOHN.DANIEL.1031 Digitally signed by MURPHY.JOHN.DANIEL.1031033540 033540 Date: 2021.07.12 17:57:21 -04'00' John D. Murphy Date Chief Operating Officer NWSI 10-1605 JULY 26, 2021 Storm Data Preparation Table of Contents: Page 1. Storm Data Disclaimer ............................................................................................................. ...2 1.1 Local Data Retention Requirements .............................................................................................................. 3 2. Storm Data Preparation ............................................................................................................ 3 2.1 Permitted Storm Data Events ...................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.1 Storm Data Event Table ......................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Aircraft/Marine Incidents ........................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Time ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 2.3.1 Winter Weather Event Times ................................................................................................................. 6 2.3.2 Events that Span More than One Month ................................................................................................ 6 2.4 Location ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.5 Event Source ............................................................................................................................................... 7 2.5.1 Storm Data Event Source Table ............................................................................................................. 7 2.6 Fatalities/Injuries ........................................................................................................................................ 8 2.6.1 Direct Fatalities/Injuries ......................................................................................................................... 8 2.6.1.1 Specifying Direct Fatality Locations ................................................................................................. 9 2.6.1.2 Direct Fatality Location Table ........................................................................................................ 10 2.6.2 Indirect Fatalities/Injuries .................................................................................................................... 10 2.6.3 Delayed Fatalities ................................................................................................................................ 11 2.7 Damage ..................................................................................................................................................... 11 2.7.1 Flood-Related Damage ........................................................................................................................ 12 2.7.2 Crop Damage Data ............................................................................................................................... 12 2.7.3 Other Related Costs ............................................................................................................................. 13 2.7.4 Delayed Damage .................................................................................................................................. 13 2.8 Magnitude of Storm .................................................................................................................................. 13 2.9 Textual Description of Storm (Narrative) ................................................................................................. 13 2.9.1 Episode Narrative ................................................................................................................................ 13 2.9.2 Event Narrative .................................................................................................................................... 14 2.9.3 Cause of Event ..................................................................................................................................... 16 2.10 Pictures ..................................................................................................................................................... 16 3. Disposition of Storm Data ...................................................................................................... 16 4. Tornado and Severe Thunderstorm Confirmation Reports ..................................................... ...16 4.1 Table of SPC Statistical Messages ............................................................................................................ 17 5. Event Types ............................................................................................................................ 17 APPENDIX A – Event Types……………………………………….…………………………A-1 APPENDIX B – Glossary of Terms……….…….………………….……………………….... B-1 1 Storm Data Disclaimer. Storm Data is an official publication of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) which documents: a. The occurrence of storms and other significant weather phenomena having sufficient intensity to cause loss of life, injuries, significant property damage, and/or disruption to commerce; b. Rare, unusual, weather phenomena that generate media attention, such as snow flurries in South Florida or the San Diego coastal area; and 2 NWSI 10-1605 JULY 26, 2021 c. Other significant meteorological events, such as record maximum or minimum temperatures or precipitation that occur in connection with another event. While Storm Data serves as official input to the National Weather Service (NWS) verification system for select programs, the primary purpose of Storm Data is to accurately describe events, regardless of the impact on verification scores. Some information appearing in Storm Data may be provided by or gathered from sources outside the NWS, such as the media, law enforcement and/or other government agencies, emergency managers, private companies, individuals, etc. An effort is made to use the best available information, but because of time and resource constraints, information from these sources may be unverified by the NWS. Accordingly, the NWS does not guarantee the accuracy or validity of the information. Further, when information appearing in Storm Data originated from a source outside the NWS (frequently credit is provided), Storm Data users requiring additional information should contact that source directly. In most cases, NWS employees will not have the knowledge to respond to such requests. In cases of legal proceedings, Federal regulations generally prohibit NWS employees from appearing as witnesses in litigation not involving the United States. Reference NWS Instruction (NWSI) 10-2005, Handling and Releasing Accident-Related Weather Information, or the NWS Forensic Services Program Manager for additional guidance. The determination of direct versus indirect causes of weather-related fatalities or injuries is not a legal determination and should not be considered as such. The determination is intended for internal NWS statistical review to assist NWS in its primary mission of issuing forecasts and warnings for hazardous hydrometeorological events. 1.1 Local Data Retention Requirements. All documentation used for the production of Storm Data will be retained locally for two years. Note: The National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) is the official custodian of NWS weather records and responds to requests for certified records for litigation purposes. 2 Storm Data Preparation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Causes and Behavior of a Tornadic Fire-Whirlwind
    61 §OUTHWJE§T FOJRJE§T & JRANGJE JEXlPJEJREMlE '"'"T § TAT1,o~ 8 e r k e I e y , C a I i f o '{"1'~qiNNT':l E_ ;:;;~"~~~1 ,;i,.,. ..t"; .... ~~ :;~ ·-:-; , r~-.fi... .liCo)iw:;-;sl- Central Reference File II ....·~ 0 ........................................(). 7 ;s_ .·············· ··········· Causes and Behavior of a Tornadic Fire-Whirlwind ARTHUR R.PIRSKO, LEO M.SERGIUS, AND CARL W.HICKERSON ABSTRACT: A destructive whirlwind of tor­ Normally an early March nadic force was formed in a 600-acre brush fire burning on the lee side o f a ridge brush fire would not be much near Santa Barbara on March 7, 1964. The of a problem for experienced fire whirlwind, formed in a post-frontal unstable air mass, cut a mile long path, firefighters in the Santa Bar- injured 4 people, destroyed 2 houses, a barn, · bara area of the Los Padres and 4 automobiles, and wrecked a 100-tree avocado orchard. National Forest in southern California. But the Polo fire of March 7, 1964, spread several times faster than expected and culminated in a fire -whirl­ wind of tornadic violence (fig. 1). It represents a classic case of such fire behavior and was unusually well documented by surface and upper air observations. This fire damaged 600 acres of prime watershed land, and the fire -induced tornado injured 4 persons; destroyed 2 homes, a barn, and 3 automobiles; and toppled almost 100 avocado trees. BURNING CONDITIONS FUELS The fire area was predominantly 50-year old ceanothus (Cea­ nothus sp.) that stood 10 to 15 feet high (fig. 2). Minor amounts of California sagebrush (Artemisia californica) and scrub oak (Quer­ cus dumosa) were intermixed with the ceanothus.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Vita Flaxen D.L. Conway A. Employment, Professional
    Current Vita July 2015 Flaxen D.L. Conway Director, Marine Resource Management Graduate Program Professor, School of Public Policy Extension Community Outreach Specialist, Oregon Sea Grant 104 CEOAS Admin, Oregon State University Corvallis, OR 97331 Phone: 541-737-1339 Fax: 541-737-2064 E-mail: [email protected] A. Employment, Professional Development, and Education 1. Employment May 2011 to present Oregon State University, College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Corvallis, OR Director of the Marine Resource Management graduate program. July 08 to present Oregon State University, Cooperative Extension Service Corvallis, OR Extension Community Outreach Specialist / Professor. Jun 02 to Jun 08 Oregon State University, Cooperative Extension Service Corvallis, OR Extension Community Outreach Specialist / Associate Professor. Jul 91 to Jun 02 Oregon State University, Cooperative Extension Service Corvallis, OR Extension Community Outreach Specialist / Assistant Professor. May 89 - Jul 91 Oregon State University Cooperative Extension Service Corvallis, OR Extension Technology Outreach Agent / Assistant Professor. Jan 87 - Apr 89 Organically Grown Cooperative Eugene, OR Operations Director and Horticultural Consultant. Jun 84 - Jun 86 Oregon State University, Department of Horticulture Corvallis, OR Graduate Research/Teaching Assistant. 2. Professional Development March 2015 Society for Applied Anthropology, 4-day conference for members of my field. This year in Pittsburgh, PA. Sept 2014 2nd World Small-Scale Fisheries Congress, Merida, Mexico. By invitation only. March 2014 Society for Applied Anthropology, 4-day conference for members of my field. This year in Albuquerque, NM. Flaxen D.L. Conway June 2013 “Fishing Futures: Articulating Alternatives in North American Small-Scale Fisheries” Workshop. Too Big to Ignore (Global Partnership for Small-Scale Fisheries Research), Vancouver, BC, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • National Weather Service Reference Guide
    National Weather Service Reference Guide Purpose of this Document he National Weather Service (NWS) provides many products and services which can be T used by other governmental agencies, Tribal Nations, the private sector, the public and the global community. The data and services provided by the NWS are designed to fulfill us- ers’ needs and provide valuable information in the areas of weather, hydrology and climate. In addition, the NWS has numerous partnerships with private and other government entities. These partnerships help facilitate the mission of the NWS, which is to protect life and prop- erty and enhance the national economy. This document is intended to serve as a reference guide and information manual of the products and services provided by the NWS on a na- tional basis. Editor’s note: Throughout this document, the term ―county‖ will be used to represent counties, parishes, and boroughs. Similarly, ―county warning area‖ will be used to represent the area of responsibility of all of- fices. The local forecast office at Buffalo, New York, January, 1899. The local National Weather Service Office in Tallahassee, FL, present day. 2 Table of Contents Click on description to go directly to the page. 1. What is the National Weather Service?…………………….………………………. 5 Mission Statement 6 Organizational Structure 7 County Warning Areas 8 Weather Forecast Office Staff 10 River Forecast Center Staff 13 NWS Directive System 14 2. Non-Routine Products and Services (watch/warning/advisory descriptions)..…….. 15 Convective Weather 16 Tropical Weather 17 Winter Weather 18 Hydrology 19 Coastal Flood 20 Marine Weather 21 Non-Precipitation 23 Fire Weather 24 Other 25 Statements 25 Other Non-Routine Products 26 Extreme Weather Wording 27 Verification and Performance Goals 28 Impact-Based Decision Support Services 30 Requesting a Spot Fire Weather Forecast 33 Hazardous Materials Emergency Support 34 Interactive Warning Team 37 HazCollect 38 Damage Surveys 40 Storm Data 44 Information Requests 46 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Art Directable Tornadoes
    ART DIRECTABLE TORNADOES A Thesis by RAVINDRA DWIVEDI Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May 2011 Major Subject: Visualization Art Directable Tornadoes Copyright 2011 Ravindra Dwivedi ART DIRECTABLE TORNADOES A Thesis by RAVINDRA DWIVEDI Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Approved by: Chair of Committee, Vinod Srinivasan Committee Members, John Keyser Wei Yan Head of Department, Tim McLaughlin May 2011 Major Subject: Visualization iii ABSTRACT Art Directable Tornadoes. (May 2011) Ravindra Dwivedi, B.E., Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Vinod Srinivasan Tornado simulations in the visual effects industry have always been an interesting problem. Developing tools to provide more control over such effects is an important and challenging task. Current methods to achieve these effects use either particle systems or fluid simulation. Particle systems give a lot of control over the simulation but do not take into account the fluid characteristics of tornadoes. The other method which involves fluid simulation models the fluid behavior accurately but does not give control over the simulation. In this thesis, a novel method to model tornado behavior is presented. A tool based on this method was also created. The method proposed in this thesis uses a hybrid approach that combines the flexibility of particle systems while producing interesting swirling motions inherent in the fluids. The main focus of the research is on providing easy-to-use controls for art directors to help them achieve the desired look of the simulation effectively.
    [Show full text]
  • What Are We Doing with (Or To) the F-Scale?
    5.6 What Are We Doing with (or to) the F-Scale? Daniel McCarthy, Joseph Schaefer and Roger Edwards NOAA/NWS Storm Prediction Center Norman, OK 1. Introduction Dr. T. Theodore Fujita developed the F- Scale, or Fujita Scale, in 1971 to provide a way to compare mesoscale windstorms by estimating the wind speed in hurricanes or tornadoes through an evaluation of the observed damage (Fujita 1971). Fujita grouped wind damage into six categories of increasing devastation (F0 through F5). Then for each damage class, he estimated the wind speed range capable of causing the damage. When deriving the scale, Fujita cunningly bridged the speeds between the Beaufort Scale (Huler 2005) used to estimate wind speeds through hurricane intensity and the Mach scale for near sonic speed winds. Fujita developed the following equation to estimate the wind speed associated with the damage produced by a tornado: Figure 1: Fujita's plot of how the F-Scale V = 14.1(F+2)3/2 connects with the Beaufort Scale and Mach number. From Fujita’s SMRP No. 91, 1971. where V is the speed in miles per hour, and F is the F-category of the damage. This Amazingly, the University of Oklahoma equation led to the graph devised by Fujita Doppler-On-Wheels measured up to 318 in Figure 1. mph flow some tens of meters above the ground in this tornado (Burgess et. al, 2002). Fujita and his staff used this scale to map out and analyze 148 tornadoes in the Super 2. Early Applications Tornado Outbreak of 3-4 April 1974.
    [Show full text]
  • Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena ....…….…....……………
    MAY 2006 VOLUME 48 NUMBER 5 SSTORMTORM DDATAATA AND UNUSUAL WEATHER PHENOMENA WITH LATE REPORTS AND CORRECTIONS NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION noaa NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITE, DATA AND INFORMATION SERVICE NATIONAL CLIMATIC DATA CENTER, ASHEVILLE, NC Cover: Baseball-to-softball sized hail fell from a supercell just east of Seminole in Gaines County, Texas on May 5, 2006. The supercell also produced 5 tornadoes (4 F0’s 1 F2). No deaths or injuries were reported due to the hail or tornadoes. (Photo courtesy: Matt Jacobs.) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Outstanding Storm of the Month …..…………….….........……..…………..…….…..…..... 4 Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena ....…….…....……………...........…............ 5 Additions/Corrections.......................................................................................................................... 406 Reference Notes .............……...........................……….........…..……........................................... 427 STORM DATA (ISSN 0039-1972) National Climatic Data Center Editor: William Angel Assistant Editors: Stuart Hinson and Rhonda Herndon STORM DATA is prepared, and distributed by the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service (NESDIS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena narratives and Hurricane/Tropical Storm summaries are prepared by the National Weather Service. Monthly and annual statistics and summaries of tornado and lightning events
    [Show full text]
  • Probable Maximum Precipitation Estimates, United States East of the 105Th Meridian
    HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL REPORT 'N0.53 L D ..... 'C..,p "\ ..u o tM/ 'A1 ws/t.d/M 'b !>"'"'"' , , 1 1 ~, 5 E.~..~t:-west J/.,e; h~ s,J~ ..s, .... ~ ,41'b ~·qto Seasonal Variation of 10-Square-Mile Probable Maximum Precipitation Estimates, United States East of the 105th Meridian ,_ U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, , -- NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOS~HERIC ADMINISI'RATION U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION - , - Silver Spnng, Md , , Apn11980 U.S. Department of Commerce U.S. Nuclear Regulatory National Oceanic and Atmospheric Commission Administration NUREG/CR-1486 Hydrometeorological Report No. 53 SEASONAL VARIATION OF 10-SQUARE-MILE PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION ESTIMATES) UNITED STATES EAST OF THE 105TH MERIDIAN Prepared by Francis P. Ho and John T. Riedel Hydrometeorological Branch Office of Hydrology National Weather Service Washington, D.C. April 1980 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract. 1 1. Introduction . 1 1.1 Authorization. 1 1.2 Purpose. 1 1.3 Scope ••... 1 1.4 Definitions .. 2 1.5 Previous study 2 2. Basic data . 2 2.1 Background • • • • • . 2 2.2 Available station rainfall data •• 3 2.2.1 Storm rainfall • • • • • 3 2.2.2 Maximum 1-day or 24-hour values, each month ••••••• 3 2.2.3 Maximum 6-, 12- and 24-hr values, each month . 3 2.2.4 11aximum recorded rainfall at first-order stations. 3 2.2.5 Data tapes, selected stations. 3 2.2.6 Data tapes, 1948-73 •. 5 2.2.7 Canadian data. 5 3. Approach to PMP. • ••. 5 3.1 Summary. 5 3.2 Selected major storm values •. 5 3.3 Moisture maximization.
    [Show full text]
  • P4.6 Observations from the 13 April 2004 Wake Low Damaging Wind Event in South Florida
    P4.6 OBSERVATIONS FROM THE 13 APRIL 2004 WAKE LOW DAMAGING WIND EVENT IN SOUTH FLORIDA Robert R. Handel and Pablo Santos NOAA/NWS, Miami, Florida 1. INTRODUCTION of April 12th persisted across the Florida Straits. This boundary exhibited pseudo-warm frontal characteristics, Damaging winds affected portions of South Florida and was lifting northward over South Florida (white during the early morning of April 13, 2004. These winds dashed line in Fig. 1). To the north of the boundary, a occurred behind a large area of stratiform precipitation cool and stable surface layer was present over land. associated with a mesoscale convective system (MCS) A high amplitude longwave mid/upper tropospheric that moved across the southeastern Gulf of Mexico trough was located over the eastern United States. The during the evening of April 12, 2004 (Fig. 1). Wind axis of this trough extended from the Great Lakes speeds sustained between 30 and 50 mph with gusts southward to the central Gulf of Mexico while South reaching 76 mph were recorded on Lake Okeechobee. Florida was upstream of the ridge axis located near These winds produced a seiche effect on Lake 65°W longitude. In addition, a 130-knot (67 m s-1) polar Okeechobee, resulting in a 5.5 ft maximum water level jet and 60-knot (31 m s-1) subtropical jet were splitting differential between the north and south sides of this over the Gulf of Mexico and South Florida producing shallow lake (Fig. 8). In addition, damage from the high significant upper level diffluence over South Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • ESSENTIALS of METEOROLOGY (7Th Ed.) GLOSSARY
    ESSENTIALS OF METEOROLOGY (7th ed.) GLOSSARY Chapter 1 Aerosols Tiny suspended solid particles (dust, smoke, etc.) or liquid droplets that enter the atmosphere from either natural or human (anthropogenic) sources, such as the burning of fossil fuels. Sulfur-containing fossil fuels, such as coal, produce sulfate aerosols. Air density The ratio of the mass of a substance to the volume occupied by it. Air density is usually expressed as g/cm3 or kg/m3. Also See Density. Air pressure The pressure exerted by the mass of air above a given point, usually expressed in millibars (mb), inches of (atmospheric mercury (Hg) or in hectopascals (hPa). pressure) Atmosphere The envelope of gases that surround a planet and are held to it by the planet's gravitational attraction. The earth's atmosphere is mainly nitrogen and oxygen. Carbon dioxide (CO2) A colorless, odorless gas whose concentration is about 0.039 percent (390 ppm) in a volume of air near sea level. It is a selective absorber of infrared radiation and, consequently, it is important in the earth's atmospheric greenhouse effect. Solid CO2 is called dry ice. Climate The accumulation of daily and seasonal weather events over a long period of time. Front The transition zone between two distinct air masses. Hurricane A tropical cyclone having winds in excess of 64 knots (74 mi/hr). Ionosphere An electrified region of the upper atmosphere where fairly large concentrations of ions and free electrons exist. Lapse rate The rate at which an atmospheric variable (usually temperature) decreases with height. (See Environmental lapse rate.) Mesosphere The atmospheric layer between the stratosphere and the thermosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • SKYWARN Detailed Documentation
    SKYWARN Detailed Documentation NWS Terminology Convective Outlook Categories Risk Description 0 - Delineates, to the right of a line, where a 10% or greater probability of General thunderstorms is forecast during the valid period. 1 - An area of severe storms of either limited organization and longevity, or very low Marginal coverage and marginal intensity. An area of organized severe storms, which is not widespread in coverage with 2 - Slight varying levels of intensity. 3 - An area of greater (relative to Slight risk) severe storm coverage with varying Enhanced levels of intensity. An area where widespread severe weather with several tornadoes and/or numerous 4 - severe thunderstorms is likely, some of which should be intense. This risk is Moderate usually reserved for days with several supercells producing intense tornadoes and/or very large hail, or an intense squall line with widespread damaging winds. An area where a severe weather outbreak is expected from either numerous intense and long-tracked tornadoes or a long-lived derecho-producing thunderstorm complex that produces hurricane-force wind gusts and widespread damage. This 5 - High risk is reserved for when high confidence exists in widespread coverage of severe weather with embedded instances of extreme severe (i.e., violent tornadoes or very damaging convective wind events). Hazardous Weather Risks Risk Description An advisory is issued when a hazardous weather or hydrologic event is occurring, imminent, or likely. Advisories are for "less serious" conditions than warnings that may cause significant inconvenience, and if caution is not exercised could lead to Advisory situations that may threaten life or property. The National Weather Service may activate weather spotters in areas affected by advisories to help them better track and analyze the event.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Region Technical Attachment 95-08 Examination of an Apparent
    CRH SSD APRIL 1995 CENTRAL REGION TECHNICAL ATTACHMENT 95-08 EXAMINATION OF AN APPARENT LANDSPOUT IN THE EASTERN BLACK HILLS OF WESTERN SOUTH DAKOTA David L. Hintz1 and Matthew J. Bunkers National Weather Service Office Rapid City, South Dakota 1. Abstract On June 29, 1994, an apparent landspout occurred in the Black Hills of South Dakota. This landspout exhibited most of the features characteristic of traditional landspouts documented in eastern Colorado. The landspout lasted 3 to 8 minutes, had a width of less than 20 m and a path of 1 to 3 km, produced estimated wind speeds of Fl intensity (33 to 50 m s1), and emanated from a towering cumulus (TCU) cloud located along a quasi-stationary convergencq/cyclonic shear zone. No radar echo was observed with this event; however, a supercell thunderstorm was located 80-100 km to the east. National Weather Service meteorologists surveyed the “very localized” damage area and ruled out the possibility of the landspout being related to microburst, gustnado, or dust devil activity, as winds away from the landspout were less than 3 m s1. The landspout apparently “detached” from the parent TCU and damaged a farm which resulted in $1,000 dollars in expenses. 2. Introduction During the late 1980’s and early 1990’s researchers documented a phe­ nomenon with subtle differences from traditional tornadoes and waterspouts, herein referred to as the landspout (Seargent 1994; Brady and Szoke 1988, 1989; Bluestein 1985). The term “landspout” was actually coined by Bluestein (I985)(in the formal literature) when he observed this type of vortex along an Oklahoma squall line.
    [Show full text]
  • Doppler Radar Observations of Anticyclonic Tornadoes in Cyclonically Rotating, Right-Moving Supercells
    APRIL 2016 B L U E S T E I N E T A L . 1591 Doppler Radar Observations of Anticyclonic Tornadoes in Cyclonically Rotating, Right-Moving Supercells HOWARD B. BLUESTEIN School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma MICHAEL M. FRENCH School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York JEFFREY C. SNYDER Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, and NOAA/OAR National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma JANA B. HOUSER Department of Geography, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio (Manuscript received 31 August 2015, in final form 27 January 2016) ABSTRACT Supercells dominated by mesocyclones, which tend to propagate to the right of the tropospheric pressure- weighted mean wind, on rare occasions produce anticyclonic tornadoes at the trailing end of the rear-flank gust front. More frequently, mesoanticyclones are found at this location, most of which do not spawn any tornadoes. In this paper, four cases are discussed in which the formation of anticyclonic tornadoes was documented in the plains by mobile or fixed-site Doppler radars. These brief case studies include the analysis of Doppler radar data for tornadoes at the following dates and locations: 1) 24 April 2006, near El Reno, Oklahoma; 2) 23 May 2008, near Ellis, Kansas; 3) 18 March 2012, near Willow, Oklahoma; and 4) 31 May 2013, near El Reno, Oklahoma. Three of these tornadoes were also documented photographically. In all of these cases, a strong mesocyclone (i.e., vortex signature characterized by azimuthal shear in excess of ;5 3 2 2 2 10 3 s 1 or a 20 m s 1 change in Doppler velocity over 5 km) or tornado was observed ;10 km away from the anticyclonic tornado.
    [Show full text]