Print 19Chap17.Tif

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Print 19Chap17.Tif NRFRAME TESTS J.X. Appleford Engineering Systems Division Aeroplane & Armament Evaluation Establisbment Boscombe Down, Salisbury, Wilts SP4 OJF UX 17.0 INTRODUCTION This Section outlines the flight testing required to demonstrate that each of the systems installed in an aircraft is suitable for its operational role(s). It is primarily written from the perspective of a military Flight Test Engineer (FTE) but most of the contents are applicable to civil aircraft. Reflecting the introductory nature of this Volume, its scope is limited to systems normally found in a11 aircraft, e.g., fuel, hydraulic, electrical, etc., systems. Tbe tests described below are usually made under the prevailing ambient conditions and, to assess behaviour under climatic extremes and in a11 weathers, further testing is conducted as described in Section 18. Tests of the propulsion system are covered separately in Section 23, but for systems associated with specific roles the reader should consult appropriate specialized sources (e.g., references 17-l and 17-2 for Airdrop and Arresting Systems, respectively). While the scope of the tests required in any particular case Will depend on the details of the aircraft's design, and on the intended operational usage, the aim is to offer sufficient guidance to enable the reader to appreciate and apply the general principles involved. Chapter 17.1 describes (in suitably broad terms) those aspects which are conunon to the testing of any aircraft system, the subsequent Chapters caver aspects relevant to particular systems, namely: 11.2 Anti/De-icing 17.3 Electrical 17.4 Engine Installation 17.5 Environmental Control 17.6 Escape 17.7 Flying Control 17.8 Fuel 17.9 Hydraulic 17.10 oxygen 17.11 Secondary Power 17.12 Undercarriage, Wheels, and Brakes and some concluding remarks are offered in Chapter 17.13. TO assist the reader with limited knowledge of aircraft systems, these latter Chapters each commence with a brief generic description of the system covered. Depending on the topic involved the format of subsequent paragraphs differ slightly but, typically, each Chapter covers the following aspects: - Paragraph 1 Description of System . Paragraph 2 Test Instrumentation Parameters . Paragraph 3 Preliminary Rig and Ground Tests . Paragraph 4 Flight Tests 17.1 QENERAL CONSIDERATIONS 17.1.1 Test Objectivea In broad terms, the main objective of aircraft system testing is to determine whether or not each system is likely to prove satisfactory when the aircraft is operated in its intended role(s). The term 'satisfactory" implies that, with the aircraft being operated anywhere within its required environmental Paper published by AGARD as part of AGARDograph 3W Flight Tes: Techniques Series - Volume 14, Seprember 1995, entiried “Introduction ro Flight Tes: Engineering”. 17-2 and flight envelopes, the system fully meets its design requirements and Will not: * Hazard the aircraft . Prevent it from fulfilling any aspect of its missions . Require undue maintenance effort, either in terms of "turn-round" time between sorties or long-term "cost of ownership". Important secondary objectives are to define the capabilities of each system, in both normal and emergency (system failed) operation, to identify any need for modification action and to provide appropriate systems operating procedures for inclusion in the Aircrew Manual. Civil and military aircraft are subject to forma1 general airworthiness requirements (which also define the acceptable means of demonstrating compliance with them), as exemplified in the UK by references 17-3 and 17-4, respectively. The FTE should therefore always consult the applicable requirements as an essential preliminary step in planning the test programme. HOWeVer, it should be noted that civil (and many military) design and test requirements are concerned only with airworthiness (or "safety") aspect*, and it Will often be necessary for the FTE (particularly one working for a military "certifying agency") to ensure that appropriate additional testing is conducted to assess the aircraft's "effectiveness" (i.e., its ability to fulfil a11 aspects of its missions without incurring an unacceptable sircrew workload or maintenance effort, etc.). 17.1.1 Overall Test Programme This volume is concerned specifically with flight testing, but it should be appreciated that, as far as aircraft systems testing is concerned, flight testing is usually the last link in a long chain. Typically, each individuel system is subjected to extensive preliminary ground testing on the bench (component tests) and on a suitable rig (sub-system and complete system tests), categorised in the UK as "Stage A" testing. Wben a11 the various systems bave been installed in the aircraft, ground tests of each are conducted using ground power ("Stage B" tests) and then with power provided by the aircraft's agine ("Stage C" tests). As the individual systems then form part of the complete aircraft, the interactions between them should be fully representative. It should be noted that the ground tests (particularly the Stage A tests) offer the opportunity to undertake testing of a type or depth which would be too difficult, risky or expensive to conduct in flight. For example, the effects of jamming of a non-return valve in a fluid control circuit cari,, sensibly, only be studied via grand tests on a bench or rig. For this reason, much of the detailed evidence required to establish confidence in system design and performance is, in fact, derived from ground rather than flight tests. c~nce each system has successfully completed the Stage C tests, the aircraft is cleared for flight testing. c1ear1y. as flight involves simultaneous use of most, if not ail, systems it is sensible (and cost-effective) to SO structure tbe flight test programme that data relevant to several systems (and/or to the aircraft performance and handling qualities tests of Sections 13 and 15, respectively) is obtained from the same test points. While *orne pointer6 are offered in the following paragraphs. the flight test engineer should always consider this aspect when constructing his flight test programme. 17.1.3 Te& Aircraft The *ystern* installed in the test aircraft should be fully representative, in a11 material respect*, of the production standard. In this context it should 17-3 be noted that the performance of one system cari be affected by the performance of another with which it interacts, so that it is important that a11 systems, and their interfaces be of the production standard. If one cl+ more system(s) is/are immature (as is often the case), the need for "repeat" testing must be given careful consideration. Where malfunction or failure degradation of a system cari bave an adverse effect on the aircraft's flying qualities or performance, it may be necessary to simulate such failures in flight via special test equipments (e.g., autopilot "runaway box", non-standard fuel tut-off valve, etc.). Where such equipments are installed, their interfaces with the normal aircraft systems must be such that there is no risk of unwanted interactions with the latter. 17.1.4 Te& Instrumentation In general, most of the flight testing described in this Section Will be conducted in conjunction with that in respect of Performance (Section 13) and Handling Qualities (Section 15). and many of the parameters of interest (such as flight conditions, aircraft configuration and pilot inputs) Will be common. As advice in respect of those parameters is readily available (e.g., reference 17-5 identifies parameter types, ranges, accuracy and sampling rates), Paragraph 2 of each chapter below lists only those parameters (such as temperatures, pressures, flow rates, etc.) which are typically needed to quantify the performance of the particular system under consideration. HOWeVer, it is emphasised that, in practice, the choice of parameters and sensor locations (and of ranges and sampling rates, etc.) must be based on intimate knowledge of the architecture of each system, its mode of operation, and the results obtained during the preliminary bench, rig and ground tests. More general advice on test instrumentation topics may be found in reference 17-6. 17.1.5 Natur. and Scope of Ta&6 Wbile the ergonomies of system operation must be considered, aircraft systems testing is less dependent on aircrew subjective judgement than is, say, the assessment of flying qualities. In cases where assessment cari be based solely on analysis of quantitative data, the manufacturer's development programme may well satisfy many of the certifying agency's needs provided that, where matters of "engineering judgement" are involved, the latter's FTEs bave adequate first-hand access to it. In meeting the overall objectives outlined in paragraph 17.1.1 above, both "normal" and "abnormal" operation of the system must be considered. "Normal" operation implies that the system is fully serviceable and being operated in accordance with the specified procedures. The nature of the flight tests undertaken Will depend on the system under investigation, and the results of the preliminary ground tests. The case of operating the system should be assessed in the context of the workload imposed by other mission- related tasks, and system performance should be monitored via the appropriate flight test instrumentation. In accordance with the guidance on flight test safety given in Section 10, the approach to potentially demanding conditions should be progressive to permit any deterioration in system performance to be identified before it constitutes a flight safety hazard. If any significant shortfalls become apparent before the design operating conditions are reached, modification action should be considered (and, if taken, the bench and/or rig tests repeated as necessary before resuming the flight triais). "Abnormal" operation includes any system malfunction or failure whose probability of occurrence is insufficiently remote for it to be discounted, the "se of any stand-by or emergency systems that are provided to caver such eventualities, and the effects of aircrew errer in operating the (serviceable) systems.
Recommended publications
  • FAA Order 8130.2H, February 4, 2015
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADM INISTRATION ORDER 8130.2H 02/04/2015 National Policy SUBJ: Airworthiness Certification of Products and Articles This order establishes procedures for accomplishing original and recurrent airworthiness certification ofaircraft and related products and articles. The procedures contained in this order apply to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) manufacturing aviation safety inspectors (ASI), to FAA airworthiness AS Is, and to private persons or organizations delegated authority to issue airworthiness certificates and related approvals. Suggestions for improvement of this order may be submitted using the FAA Office of Aviation Safety (AVS) directive feedback system at http://avsdfs.avs.faa.gov/default.aspx, or FAA Form 1320-19, Directive Feedback Information, found in appendix I to this order. D G!JD Cf1 · ~ David Hempe Manager, Design, Manufacturing, & Airworthiness Division Aircraft Certification Service Distribution: Electronic Initiated By: AIR-1 00 02/04/2015 8130.2H Table of Contents Paragraph Page Chapter 1. Introduction 100. Purpose of This Order .............................................................................. 1-1 101. Audience .................................................................................................. 1-1 102. Where Can I Find This Order .................................................................. 1-1 103. Explanation of Policy Changes ................................................................ 1-1 104. Cancellation ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Leading the Charge We Put TBM 940 Speedster Through Its Paces for NBAA
    15-21 October 2019 I flightglobal.com FLIGHT TEST Leading the charge We put TBM 940 speedster through its paces for NBAA £3.90 Wow, how? ACES high 42 Questions remain over defunct US Air Force boosts Collins Icelandic carrier’s comeback 13 with ejection seat deal 20 9 770015 371310 FLIGHT TEST Power of one Turboprop-single family has been a market success since launch in 1988, amassing sales of more than 900 units across three variants Daher has delivered a compelling offer for owner-flyers, with a range of enhancements on the TBM 940 providing an edge over the piston-twin segment. We put it through its paces MICHAEL GERZANICS POMPANO BEACH have allowed single-engined designs to make to be efficient. Airspace congestion, however, inroads into the twin-turbine segment. can make reaching optimum altitudes for jets he single-engined turboprop market The growth of the single-engined turbo- problematic, so their real-world range can be is populated by numerous aircraft of prop segment is based on the near-bulletproof shorter. Jets also have higher direct operating varying configurations. In broad reliability and scalability of the PT6 family. costs, however. T strokes, it can be broken down into This paradigm shift from piston-twins to tur- Runway performance and training require- two segments: fast, low-winged aircraft and bine-singles is conceptually on par with ex- ments are also two factors that fuel the single- slower, more spacious high-winged designs. tended twin-engine operations authorisations engined turboprop segment, because runway In the West, these diverse offerings share a all but killing off three- and four-engined civil length for turboprops is shorter than that single critical component – their engine.
    [Show full text]
  • CF-18 Fighter Demonstration Manual
    FIGHTER DEMONSTRATION MANUAL Version 4.0 Issued under the Authority of Commander 1 Canadian Air Division Custodian: OC FSET March 2019 Endorsed by: Approved by: Recoverable Signature Recoverable Signature X A DComd FG Col Luc Girou... X BGen I.H. Huddleston MGen J.H.C Drouin Deputy Commander Force Generation Commander 1 Canadian Air Division Signed by: GIROUARD, LUC 607 Signed by: BOYLE, SEAN 627 Fighter Demonstration Manual Record of Amendments Amend DATE DETAILS DONE BY # 0 XX Mar 19 Capt Thys R.G.T. This document is issued on the authority of the OC Fighter Standards and Evaluation Team (FSET) and contains information specific to the employment and role of the Fighter Demonstration Team. Inquiries and suggestions for changes shall be forwarded through Special Events Coord and OC FSET for review and submission to SSO Fighters for the approval of the Commander 1 Canadian Air Division. Table of Contents FIGHTER DEMONSTRATION MANUAL .................................................... 1 Chapter 1: PREPARATION ........................................................................ 8 101. TEAM SELECTION ........................................................... 8 102. AIRSHOW ROUTINE ........................................................ 9 103. FIGHTER DEMONSTRATION TRAINING ........................ 9 104. ACCEPTANCE SHOW ...................................................... 9 Chapter 2: OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS .................................... 11 201. CONFIGURATION .......................................................... 11
    [Show full text]
  • This Annex to EASA TCDS IM.A.636 Was Created to Publish Selected
    Explanatory Note to TCDS No.: EASA.IM.A.636 – M3000 Date: 06/03/2020 Issue: 03 This annex to EASA TCDS IM.A.636 was created to publish selected special conditions / deviations / equivalent safety findings that are part of the applicable certification basis: CONTENTS B-02 High Speed Characteristics 2 B-52 Human Factor – Integrated Avionics Systems 12 C-03 Speed Margin 18 C-04 Yawing Manoeuvre 21 C-106 Emergency landing dynamic conditions - HIC 22 C-107 Emergency landing dynamic conditions - lumbar loads 24 D-01 Take-off Warning System 26 D-02 Extension and Retraction Systems 27 D-03 Wheels 28 D-04 Brakes and Braking System 29 D-05 Doors / Canopy 32 D-06 Bird Strike 35 D-102 Canopy Fracturing System 36 D-103 Ejection Seats 44 D-105 Emergency Evacuation Provisions 52 D-106 Fire Extinguisher 53 D-107 Cabin Pressure Altitude Warning Indication 54 E-101 Digital Electronic engine/propeller control PMU 55 E-114 Suction Defuel 56 E-115 Single Power Control Lever 57 E-116 Digital Propeller Tachometer and Markings 58 E-117 Digital Propeller Tachometer and Markings 59 F-02 Hydraulic System 60 F-52 Protection from Effects of HIRF 61 F-54 Protection from Effects of Lightning Strike, Indirect Effects 65 F-101 On Board Oxygen Generator System - OBOGS 66 F-103 Electronic Standby Direction Indicator (Compass) 71 F-104 HUD Certification 72 ESF 23.841-01 Cabin rate of climb indicator removal 74 ESF 23.1555 Use of Yellow and Black Emergency Markings 75 Disclaimer – This document is not exhaustive and it will be updated gradually.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Development of Ejection Seat Mechanism in Aircraft
    International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE) ISSN: 2278-3075, Volume-8 Issue-11, September 2019 Design and Development of Ejection Seat Mechanism in Aircraft R. Rajaprasanna, A. Rajendra Prasad, T. Vignesh, M. C. Anand Chakaravarthi, Priyadarshi Dutt appropriate to fly an air ship. For moving of seats it need high Abstract: This research manages the discharge framework that fuel and cost of such carriers would be essentially astronomic. can be actualized in a common air ship. It is significant for a In the contender flying machines at the hour of launch the flying machine to have a launch situate in the event that the plane shade is first opened and the discharge seat is rescued with the meets a mishap in a fight or during experimental drill and the pilot, this framework can be additionally utilized in the pilot needs to rescue to spare their life. The component includes common plane to rescue the pilot, yet as by the common lifting of the pilot to a protected good ways from the air ship and after that sending the parachute. As there is increment in air airplane laws, the pilot is in charge of the security of the traffic, this discharge framework gives extra security measures to travelers. Simultaneously the travelers can't be catapulted like the life of travelers. By this strategy alongside the pilot, the group in the contender planes since we can't open the top of the individuals and the travelers can be spared. This discharge plane and can't discharge huge number of travelers one after framework comprises of an exceptionally made ejector cushion, another.
    [Show full text]
  • Ejection Seat Mechanism in Civil Aircraft Richard Johnson Abstract—This Paper Deals with the Ejection System That Can Be Implemented in a Civil Aircraft
    International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 3, Issue 10, October-2012 1 ISSN 2229-5518 Ejection Seat Mechanism in Civil Aircraft Richard Johnson Abstract—this paper deals with the ejection system that can be implemented in a civil aircraft. It is important for an aircraft to have an ejection seat in case the plane meets an accident in a battle or during test flight and the pilot has to bail out to save his or her life. The mechanism involves lifting of the pilot to a safe distance away from the aircraft and then deploying the parachute. As there is increase in air traffic, this ejection system provides additional safety measures to the life of passengers. By this method along with the pilot, the crew members and the passengers can be saved. This ejection system consists of a specially made ejector pad, track system and parachute. The ejection system is governed by a timing sensor which ensures that the movement of the passenger seat take place in equal interval of time to avoid collision between two consecutive seats. Index Terms- Bail, ejector pad, track system, ejection, hydraulic, propulsion, stability. —————————— —————————— empty weight. Instead of high propulsive power, simple 1 INTRODUCTION spring mechanism is implemented. To avoid the collisions the 1.1 Problem statement timing system, sequence and equal interval of ejection is Ejection seats have been traditionally fitted in military included. aircraft from the late 1940’s and onwards. But it was not used In this method there is no need to open the roof of the in the civil aircrafts because of the following reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace and Propulsion A
    Commerce Control List Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 Category 9—page 1 CATEGORY 9 - AEROSPACE AND turbine engines which meet all of the following: PROPULSION a. Certified by the civil aviation authority in a country listed in Supplement No. 1 to Part 743; A. “END ITEMS,” “EQUIPMENT,” and “ACCESSORIES,” “ATTACHMENTS,” “PARTS,” “COMPONENTS,” AND b. Intended to power non-military manned “SYSTEMS” “aircraft” for which any of the following has been issued by a Wassenaar Arrangement N.B.: For propulsion systems designed or Participating State listed in Supplement No. 1 to rated against neutron or transient ionizing Part 743 for the “aircraft” with this specific radiation, see the U.S. Munitions List, 22 CFR engine type: part 121. b.1. A civil type certificate; or 9A001 Aero gas turbine engines having any of b.2. An equivalent document recognized the following (see List of Items Controlled). by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). License Requirements Note 2: 9A001.a does not apply to aero Reason for Control: NS, MT, AT gas turbine engines for Auxiliary Power Units (APUs) approved by the civil aviation authority Country Chart in a Wassenaar Arrangement Participating State Control(s) (See Supp. No. (see Supplement No. 1 to part 743 of the EAR). 1 to part 738) NS applies to entire entry NS Column 1 b. Designed to power an “aircraft” designed to MT applies to only to those MT Column 1 cruise at Mach 1 or higher, for more than 30 engines that meet the minutes. characteristics listed in 9A101 AT applies to entire entry AT Column 1 9A002 ‘Marine gas turbine engines’ designed List Based License Exceptions (See Part 740 for to use liquid fuel and having all of the a description of all license exceptions) following (see List of Items Controlled), and “specially designed” assemblies and LVS: N/A “components” therefor.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal and Engineering Aspects of Deployable Black Boxes with Video Recording Capability
    IJMS 2016 vol. 4 (1): International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies (IJMS) Volume 4, Issue 1, 2017 Legal and Engineering Aspects of Deployable Black Boxes with Video Recording Capability Abeysekara Thusitha B1 and Abimani Menuwansala Peiris H2 1Department of Civil Law, Faculty of Law, General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University, Sri Lanka 2Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University, Sri Lanka ABSTRACT Black box is a compilation of data produced by on-board and ground communications, specifically and inherently in digital nature; therefore it is a digital database and part of a discussion on protection of digital databases. The Existing Black box technology used in Commercial Aircraft is accommodated with Affixed type black boxes. However, if the Deployable black boxes are implemented with fixed black boxes as a dual combined recorder system, the discovery of crash location can be determined with more effectually than the present technology. The lives of the survivors, initiation of aircraft accident and investigation progression obtain safety recommendations to avoid similar happenstances will depend upon the accessibility to the crash location immediately by search and rescue organizations with the reliable information they achieved through satellite communications. Deployable Recorders will provide a backup source of flight data other than the fixed black box data; assist the investigators to carry out their investigations with more trustworthy information while implementing the video recording capability. A new idea has been introduced in this research to implement a mechanism to deploy a parachute with the ejection of the deployable recorder from the aircraft to minimize the impact during its dwindling to the ground.
    [Show full text]
  • L-39 Albatros: Own and Fly a Fighter Jet
    FOR THE PILOTS OF OWNER-FLOWN, CABIN-CLASS AIRCRAFT FEBRUARY 2019 $3.95 US VOLUME 23 NUMBER 2 L-39 Albatros: Own and Fly a Fighter Jet Return to Service Checklist Crosswinds and Contamination Meet a Worldwide Ferry Pilot More Tech for Your Tow February 2019 TWIN & TURBINE • 1 B/E Aerospace Inc. 4/C Ad www.winner-aviation.com mail to: [email protected] 2 • TWIN & TURBINE February 2019 2 2019 Optimism FEBRUARY2019 • VOL. 23, NO. 2 by Rebecca Groom Jacobs Contents 3 Airmail 4 Return to Service Checklist by Dianne White 6 When the Rubber 6 Doesn’t Meet the Road by Joe Casey Jet Journal 10 L-39 Albatros: Own and Fly a Fighter Jet by Dan Greenwald 10 16 Cheap at Any Price by Kevin Ware 22 Five on the Fly Five Questions with Ferry Pilot 16 Guido Warnecke by Rebecca Groom Jacobs 24 Best Tugs: Advanced Towing by Rich Pickett From the Flight Deck 22 28 Gettin’ Hitched: Saying ‘I Do’ to DIY Aircraft Towing by Kevin Dingman En Route 30 Ice Shield Reduces Downtime with New Wing B/E Aerospace Inc. 24 Boot Application 4/C Ad AeroSearcher: A New Way to Search for Aviation Products www.winner-aviation.com On Final mail to: [email protected] 32 How to Train an Astronaut by David Miller Twin & Turbine (ISSN 1945-6514), USPS 24432 is published monthly by Village Press, Inc. with advertising offices located at 2779 EDITOR ADVERTISING DIRECTOR Aero Park Drive, Traverse City, Michigan Rebecca Groom Jacobs John Shoemaker 49686. Telephone (231) 946-3712.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin-Baker)
    TM 55-1680-308-24 TECHNICAL MANUAL ORGANIZATIONAL, DS AND GS MAINTENANCE MANUAL EJECTION SEAT, MODEL MK-J5D (MARTIN-BAKER) PART NUMBER 134AB80000 This copy is a reprint which includes current pages from Changes 1 through 10. TM 55-1680-308-24, dated 13 December 1974, rescinded by DA Pam 310-1, is now reinstated for active Army and is available through normal supply channels. HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 13 DECEMBER 1974 This manual is published for the use of all concerned. By Order of the Secretary of the Army FRED C. WEYAND Official General. United States Army VERNE L. BOWERS Chief of Staff Major General, United States Army The Adjutant General DISTRIBUTION: To be distributed in accordance with DA Form 12-31 Organizational Maintenance Requirements for OV-1A, B and C, and OV-1D aircraft. TM 55-1680-308-24 URGENT C 10 CHANGE HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NO. 10 } WASHINGTON, D.C., 14 May 1991 ORGANIZATIONAL, DS AND GS MAINTENANCE MANUAL EJECTION SEAT, MODEL MK-J5D (MARTIN-BAKER) PART NUMBER 134AB80000 TM 55-1680-308-24, 13 December 1974, is changed as follows: 1. Remove and insert pages as indicated below. New or changed text material is indicated by a vertical bar in the margin. An illustration change is indicated by a miniature pointing hand. Remove pages Insert pages i and ii i and ii 1-1 and 1-2 1-1 and 1-2 3-1 and 3-2 3-1 and 3-2 4-47 and 4-48 4-47 and 4-48 4-48A/4-48B 4-48A/4-48B 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Aircraft Ejection Seat Safety When Using Advanced Helmet Sensors
    Report No. DODIG‑2015‑090 U.S. Department of Defense InspectorMARCH 9, 2015 General Evaluation of Aircraft Ejection Seat Safety When Using Advanced Helmet Sensors INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY ACCOUNTABILITY EXCELLENCE INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY ACCOUNTABILITY EXCELLENCE Mission Our mission is to provide independent, relevant, and timely oversight of the Department of Defense that supports the warfighter; promotes accountability, integrity, and efficiency; advises the Secretary of Defense and Congress; and informs the public. Vision Our vision is to be a model oversight organization in the Federal Government by leading change, speaking truth, and promoting excellence—a diverse organization, working together as one professional team, recognized as leaders in our field. Fraud, Waste & Abuse HOTLINE Department of Defense dodig.mil/hotline|800.424.9098 For more information about whistleblower protection, please see the inside back cover. Evaluation of Aircraft Ejection Seat Safety When Using ResultsAdvanced Helmet in SensorsBrief March 9, 2015 Findings (cont’d) Objective Handbook,” October 1998, has not been revised or updated as required by DoD Manual 4120.24, We are issuing this report in response to a “Defense Standardization Program (DSP), Policies request from Congress through the National and Procedures.” Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2015. We determined whether Furthermore, our evaluation concluded that the overall risk DoD aircraft ejection seats meet aircrew of ejection is remote. Also, the addition of HMDs and/or survivability and equipment airworthiness NVGs does not significantly increase the risk of major injury requirements for pilots and aircrew wearing during ejection if the aircrew is following proper ejection helmet -mounted displays (HMDs), night procedures described in the Naval Air Training and Operating vision goggles (NVGs), or both during Procedures (NATOPS) or the Air Force flight manuals.
    [Show full text]
  • B-177166 In-Flight Escape Systems for Helicopters Should Be
    .J REPORT TO THE CONGRESS I In-Flight Escape Systems For Helicopters Should Be Developed To Prevent Fatalities 6a777766 Department of Defense BY THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STAT GOMPTROLLER GENERAL OFTHE UNITED STATES WASHINGION DC 20648 B-177166 To the President of the Senate and the 4 Speaker of the House of Representatives / We are reporting that In-flight escape systems for helicopters should be developed to prevent fatalltles. We made our review pursuant to the Budget and AC- countxng Act, 1921 (31 U s.c 531, and the Accounting and Auditing Act of 1950 (31 U S.C 67). We are sending copies of this report to the Director, Office of Management and Budget, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of the Army, and the Secretary of the Navy, Comptroller General of the United States Contents Page DIGEST 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 5 2 URGENTNEED FOR HELICOPTER IN-FLIGHT ESCAPESYSTEMS 6 3 EFFORTS TO DEVELOPA CAPSULE IN-FLIGHT ESCAPESYSTEM 9 Technlcal feaslblllty demonstrated 9 Appllcatlon to operational helicopters 9 Development efforts 13 4 EFFORTS TO DEVELOPAN INDIVIDUAL IN-FLIGHT ESCAPESYSTEM 15 Indlvldual in-flight escape systems 1.5 DOD emergency funds requested for the Cobra 18 No provision for an in-flight escape system In the advanced attack helicopter 19 5 CONCLUSIONSAND RECOMMENDATIONS 20 Recommendations to the Secretary of Defense 20 Agency comments and our evaluation 21 Matters for conslderatlon by the Congress 23 APPENDIX I Letter of November 29, 1972, from the Director of Defense Research and Engineering 25 II Principal
    [Show full text]