DOCSLIB.ORG

The Republic of Sudan National Implementation Plan for the Stockholm Convention November, 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Republic of Sudan National Implementation Plan for the Stockholm Convention November, 2014 The Republic of Sudan National Implementation Plan For the Stockholm Convention November, 2014 The Republic of Sudan National Implementation Plan For the Stockholm Convention November, 2014 2 Table of Contents List of Abbreviation ....................................................................................................................................... 7 List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................... 10 List of Figures .............................................................................................................................................. 11 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 13 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 16 1.1. Stockholm Convention requirements ......................................................................................... 16 1.2. The Republic of Sudan, the Stockholm Convention and MEAs................................................... 19 1.3. NIP development methodology .................................................................................................. 20 1.3.1. Socio-Economic Assessment ............................................................................................... 23 1.3.2. Gender policy in NIP development and implementation ................................................... 27 1.3.3. Consistency with NIP update guidance ............................................................................... 28 1.3.4. Further considerations ........................................................................................................ 28 1.4. NIP structure .................................................................................................................................... 29 2. Country baseline ................................................................................................................................. 30 2.1. Country profile ............................................................................................................................ 30 2.1.1. Geography and population ................................................................................................. 30 2.1.2. Political profile .................................................................................................................... 32 2.1.3. Profiles of economic sector ................................................................................................. 33 2.1.4. Environmental overview (including relation of environment and waste/chemicals) ........ 34 2.2. Institutional, policy and regulatory framework .......................................................................... 42 2.2.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 42 2.2.2. Legal framework ................................................................................................................. 43 2.2.3. Relevant international commitment obligations ................................................................ 46 2.2.4. Sustainable development and sustainable consumption and production agenda ............ 50 3 2.2.5. Institutional framework ...................................................................................................... 51 2.3. Assessment of the POPs situation in the country ....................................................................... 54 2.3.1. Assessment of POPs Pesticides (Annex A, Part I chemicals) ............................................... 54 2.3.2. Assessment of PCB (Annex A, Part II chemicals) ................................................................. 66 2.3.3. Assessment of POP-PBDEs (Annex A, Part IV and Part V chemicals) and HBB (Annex A, Part I chemicals) ......................................................................................................................................... 70 2.3.4. Assessment with respect to DDT (Annex B, Part II chemicals) ........................................... 78 2.3.5. Assessment of PFOS, its salts and PFOSF POPs (Annex B, Part III chemicals) ..................... 80 2.3.6. Assessment of releases of unintentional produced chemicals (Annex C chemicals) ......... 90 2.3.7. Information on the state of knowledge on stockpiles, contaminated sites and waste, identification, likely numbers, relevant regulations, guidance, remediation measures, and data on releases from sites ............................................................................................................................ 101 2.3.8. Summary of future production, use, and releases of POPs – requirements for exemptions 114 2.3.9. Existing programmes for monitoring releases and environmental and human health impacts, including findings ................................................................................................................ 114 2.3.10. Current level of information, awareness, and education among target groups; existing systems to communicate such information to the various groups .................................................. 115 2.3.11. Mechanism to report under Article 15 on measures taken to implement the provisions of the Convention and for information exchange with other Parties to the Convention .................... 117 2.3.12. Relevant activities of non-governmental stakeholders .................................................... 117 2.3.13. Overview of the technical infrastructure for POPs assessment, analysis, alternatives and prevention measures, management, research and development – linkage to international programmes and projects ................................................................................................................. 117 2.3.14. Identification of impacted populations or environments, estimated scale and magnitude of threats to public ................................................................................................................................ 127 2.3.15. Details of any relevant system for the assessment and listing of new chemicals ............ 130 2.3.16. Details of any relevant system for the assessment and regulation of chemicals already in the market ......................................................................................................................................... 131 3. Strategy and action plan elements of the national implementation plan ........................................ 133 4 3.1. Policy statement ....................................................................................................................... 133 3.2. Implementation strategy .......................................................................................................... 135 3.2.1. General .............................................................................................................................. 135 3.2.2. Integrated approach of implementing chemical conventions and other conventions .... 137 3.2.3. Integrating POPs/chemical management and policy with waste and resource management considering the waste hierarchy ....................................................................................................... 138 3.2.4. Addressing POPs phase out and use of alternatives within sustainable consumption and production approach ........................................................................................................................ 138 3.3. Activities, strategies, and action plans ...................................................................................... 139 3.3.1. Activity/Action Plan: Institutional and regulatory strengthening measures .................... 139 3.3.2. Activity: Measures to reduce or eliminate releases from intentional production ........... 147 3.3.3. Activity/Action Plan: Production, import and export, use, stockpiles, and wastes of Annex A POPs pesticides (Annex A, Part I chemicals) .................................................................................. 147 3.3.4. Activity/Action Plan: Import and export, use, identification, labelling, removal, storage and disposal of PCBs and equipment containing PCBs (Annex A, Part II chemicals) ............................... 150 3.3.5. Activity: Action Plan: Import and export, use, stockpiles, and wastes of hexaBDE and heptaBDE (Annex A, Part IV chemicals) and tetraBDE and pentaBDE (Annex A, Part V chemicals) (and HBB, where applicable (Annex A, Part I chemicals)) ......................................................................... 153 3.3.6. Activity: Production, import and export, use, stockpiles, and wastes of DDT (Annex B, Part II chemicals) if used in the country ................................................................................................... 158 3.3.7. Activity: Production, import and export, use, stockpiles, and wastes of PFOS, its salts and PFOSF (Annex B, Part III chemicals) .................................................................................................. 158 3.3.8. Activity: Continuing need and register for specific exemptions (Article 4) ...................... 161 3.3.9. Action plan: Measures to reduce releases from unintentional production (Article 5) ..... 161 3.3.10.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Table of Contents
    Document 10 Agenda item 8: Report on the implementation of the programme of work approved by the Conference of the Parties to the Rotterdam Convention at its sixth meeting Rotterdam Convention Bureau meeting, 4-5 June 2014 Report on the implementation of joint activities contained in the 2014- 2015 programme budgets of the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm conventions 1. The annex to the present document contains a report prepared by the Secretariat on the implementation of joint activities in the programme budgets for 2014-2015, as approved by the conferences of the parties to the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm conventions, in their decisions BC-11/26, RC-6/16 and SC-6/30. 2. The report describes the joint activities of the programme budgets for 2014-2015 that have been implemented as of 28 February 2014. Some activities were carried out in the second half of 2013. These activities have financial implications on staff time only, unless otherwise mentioned. 3. The document also provides the expenditures incurred under the general trust funds (BC, RC and SC Trust Funds) and the voluntary trust funds (BD, RV and SV Trust Funds) in January and February 2014 for the implementation of these activities. Voluntary contributions received by donors over the two-month period for the biennium 2014-2015 are also provided. 4. Similar reports have been prepared on convention-specific activities carried out under the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm conventions 2014-2015 programme budgets. 5. Updated reports will be submitted to the meetings of the conferences of the parties in 2015 for consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemicals Management and Marine Plastics
    our JOSÉ MANUEL BARROSO REACHING SUSTAINABILITY KAREN ELLEMANN TIME TO TACKLE CHEMICALS MAANEE LEE planet BORROWING THE PRESENT The magazine of the United Nations Environment Programme — April 2011 NANCY JACKSON CHEMISTRY AS NATURE DOES IT CHEMICALS MANAGEMENT and marine plastics OUR PLANET CHEMICALS 1 Our Planet, the magazine of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) PO Box 30552, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: (254 20) 762 1234 Fax: (254 20) 762 3927 e-mail: [email protected] To view current and past issues of this publication online, please visit www.unep.org/ourplanet ISSN 1013 - 7394 Director of Publication : Satinder Bindra Editor : Geoffrey Lean Coordinator : Geoff Thompson, Mia Turner Special Contributor : Nick Nuttall Distribution Manager : Manyahleshal Kebede Design : Amina Darani Produced by : UNEP Division of Communications and Public Information Printed by : Progress Press Distributed by : SMI Books The contents of this magazine do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP or the editors, nor are they an official record. The designations employed and the presentation do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP concerning the legal status of any country, territory or city or its authority or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. * All dollar ($) amounts refer to US dollars. Cover Photo: © Getty Images UNEP promotes environmentally sound practices globally and in its own activities. This magazine is printed on 100% recycled paper, using vegetable-based inks and other eco-friendly practices. Our distribution policy aims to reduce UNEP’s carbon footprint. 2 OUR PLANET CHEMICALS JOSÉ MANUEL BARROSO : Reaching sustainability page 6 Regulating chemicals can protect health and the environment while enhancing competitiveness and innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Rc
    UNITED NATIONS RC UNEP/FAO/RC/COP.5/25/Add.1 Distr. General 20 April 2011 United Nations Original: English Environment Programme Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade Conference of the Parties Fifth meeting Geneva, 20–24 June 2011 Item 6 of the provisional agenda* Enhancing cooperation and coordination among the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm conventions Enhancing cooperation and coordination among the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm conventions Addendum Joint activities Note by the Secretariat Introduction 1. Decisions BC.Ex-1/1 of the Conference of the Parties to the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal, RC.Ex-1/1 of the Conference of the Parties to the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade and SC.Ex-1/1 of the Conference of the Parties to the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (the “omnibus decisions”) were adopted by the conferences of the parties to the three conventions at their simultaneous extraordinary meetings, in February 2010. In section I of those decisions, on joint activities, the conferences of the parties invited various stakeholders to undertake cooperative and coordinated activities to implement decision IX/10 of the Conference of the Parties to the Basel Convention, decision RC-4/11 of the Conference of the Parties to the Rotterdam Convention and decision SC-4/34 of the Conference of the Parties to the Stockholm Convention, hereinafter referred to as the “synergies decisions”.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas on Children's Health and the Environment
    INHERITING A SUSTAINABLE WORLD? ATLAS ON CHILDREN’S HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT ON CHILDREN’S HEALTH WORLD? ATLAS INHERITING A SUSTAINABLE CONTACT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION AVENUE APPIA 20 1211 GENEVA 27 SWITZERLAND http://www.who.int/phe Atlas on children’s health and the environment ISBN 978 92 4 151177 3 WHO Atlas on children’s health and the environment Inheriting a sustainable world? Atlas on children’s health and the environment ISBN 978-92-4-151177-3 © World Health Organization 2017 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization (http://www.
    [Show full text]
  • Liboiron-Redefining Pollution-11-7-12-First Pages
    Sponsoring Committee: Professor Brett Gary, Chairperson Professor Lisa Gitelman Professor Robin Nagle REDEFINING POLLUTION: PLASTICS IN THE WILD Max Liboiron Program in Media, Culture, and Communication Department of Media, Culture, and Communication Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Steinhardt School of Culture, Education and Human Development New York University 2012 Copyright © 2012 Max Liboiron ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my stellar dissertation committee, Brett Gary, Lisa Gitelman, and Robin Nagle, not only for their time and commitment to my project, and for their willingness to read, reread, edit, discuss, and read again, but also for role modeling the kind of academic I want to be: carefully and thoughtfully brilliant, empathetic, and down to earth. Thank you for supporting all aspects of my life as a young scholar, from professionalization to asking after my family’s health. This dissertation would not have been nearly as fun, satisfying, and challenging to write without the three of you, and I am deeply grateful for your generosity and mentorship. A special thank you to Erica Robles-Anderson, who fulfilled all the roles of a committee member without official acknowledgement or reward. Thank you for teaching me to think sideways and to suss out the shapes of problems. I look forward to our future collaborations. There are many intellectual communities I have had the fortune to be part of that have directly and indirectly shaped my research. My peers and advisors in the Department of Media, Culture, and Communication are some of the smartest people I’ve met, and I appreciate the perspectives and reading lists many of you have so graciously extended.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Note
    Safe Planet: the United Nations Campaign for Responsibility on Hazardous Chemicals and Wastes Background Note Contact Mr. Michael Stanley‐Jones Public Information Officer Joint Services of the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm Conventions United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) International Environment House 11‐13 chemin des Anémones, Châtelaine Geneva, Switzerland Tel: + 41 22 917 8668 E‐mail: [email protected] 1 Safe Planet: the United Nations Campaign for Responsibility on Hazardous Chemicals and Wastes highlights solutions to the growing problem of harmful substances and hazardous wastes. This ambitious campaign for ensuring the safety of the environment and human health against hazardous chemicals and wastes shows how each of us can take responsibility for keeping our planet safe. Solutions are available through initiatives undertaken by the leading global chemicals and waste management instruments – the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm conventions. To raise awareness of these solutions, Safe Planet has invited a group of high‐profile artists and musicians, business leaders, film stars, human rights advocates, scientists and sports heroes to speak out about the increasingly heavy burden chemicals and wastes place on human bodies and the environment. The Safe Planet Supporters come from all corners of the planet. Drawing from their own life experience, they show how all of us can take responsibility to meet the challenge of harmful substances and wastes. Many have pledged to share information about their own chemical body burden to call attention to the need for action. The challenge of eliminating harmful substances and hazardous wastes from the planet is enormous, while the window for taking decisive action is limited and narrowing.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Arrangements Adopted Pursuant to the “Synergies Decisions” on Cooperation and Coordination Among the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm Conventions
    Food and Agriculture United Nations Organization of the United Environment Programme Nations (FAO) (UNEP) Review of the arrangements adopted pursuant to the “Synergies Decisions” on cooperation and coordination among the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm Conventions Lee Alexander Risby Teresa Amador UNEP and FAO Evaluation Offices February 2013 Review of the Synergies Decisions on Cooperation and Coordination among the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm Conventions February 2013 Acknowledgements and Disclaimer Thanks are due to Segbedzi Norgbey, Pauline Marima and Michael Spilsbury of the UNEP Evaluation Office, and Ashwin Bhouraskar of FAO Evaluation Office for their guidance during the inception and implementation phase of the review and also to the Secretariat of the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm Conventions for their assistance. The review team express gratitude to all stakeholders who responded to requests to be interviewed during the implementation phase, including the representatives of Parties, and FAO Regional Offices and BC and SC Regional Centres. The review has benefited from the comments provided by the advisory panel members (in alphabetic order): Anna Ortiz – National Coordinator for the National Information System for the Integral Management of Chemical Substances, Ministry of Environment, Costa Rica Juha Uitto – Deputy Director of UNDP Evaluation Office Maria Ivanova – Associate Professor of Governance, University of Massachusetts, Boston Niek van der Graaf – Former Chief of FAO Plant Protection Service Robert Choog Kwet-Yive – Professor of Chemistry, University of Mauritius The views expressed in this paper are those of the consultants and the independent FAO and UNEP Evaluation Offices and should not be attributed to the FAO, UNEP and the Convention Secretariats or any other stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas on Children's Health and the Environment
    INHERITING A SUSTAINABLE WORLD? ATLAS ON CHILDREN’S HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT ON CHILDREN’S HEALTH WORLD? ATLAS INHERITING A SUSTAINABLE CONTACT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION AVENUE APPIA 20 1211 GENEVA 27 SWITZERLAND http://www.who.int/phe Atlas on children’s health and the environment ISBN 978 92 4 151177 3 WHO Atlas on children’s health and the environment Inheriting a sustainable world? Atlas on children’s health and the environment ISBN 978-92-4-151177-3 © World Health Organization 2017 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization (http://www.
    [Show full text]
  • The Opportunity of the Commons
    The Opportunity of the Commons G l s o b o n a l C o m m G l s o b o n a l C o m m Global Environment Facility 1 All life on Earth depends on clean air and water, biodiversity, and healthy forests, land, oceans and a stable climate. These global commons—the ecosystems, biomes and processes that regulate the stability and resilience of the Earth system— are the very foundation of our global economy and modern society. Today, they are facing an all-too familiar tragedy of over- exploitation and rapid degradation. 2 The Opportunity of the Commons A Defining Moment We stand at a defining moment for the future of the planet Several of the planetary boundaries have already been and human well-being. The Global Commons—the eco- breached. These include; biodiversity, now being lost at systems, biomes and processes that regulate the stability a rate unprecedented in the last 65 million years; land and resilience of the Earth system—are being stretched to use change, where nearly a third of forest cover has been breaking point. cleared worldwide and almost a quarter of the total land area under human use is being degraded; and climate, Scientists warn that the “planetary boundaries”, that have where atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide now ensured the stable conditions that have enabled all civili- exceeds 400 parts per million, their highest level in 800,000 zations to form and prosper over the last 11,000 years are years. Meanwhile greenhouse gases are also acidifying the being strained, and in some cases, exceeded.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Proceedings 5Th International Marine Debris Conference
    Summary Proceedings 5th International Marine Debris Conference 20-25 March 2011 Honolulu, HI, USA CONFERENCE PARTNERS $35,000+ NOAA Marine Debris Division NOAA Fisheries International Affairs LEAD CONFERENCE SPONSOR $25,000+ NOAA Pacific Services Center NOAA Unmanned Aircraft Systems Program CONFERENCE SPONSOR $10,000+ NOAA Office of Response and Restoration NOAA Pacific Region NOAA Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument EXHIBIT SPONSOR $5,000+ Chamber of Shipping of America CONFERENCE CONTRIBUTOR $2,500+ Oceanic Society Expeditions CONFERENCE SUPPORTER $1,000+ Kona Brewing Company Outrigger Enterprises Group Design Asylum, Inc. Kuloko Arts of Hawai‘i Society of the Plastics Industry EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Fifth International Marine Debris Conference (5IMDC) held in Honolulu, Hawaii, was a resounding success, bringing together over 450 people from all over the world to discuss the persistent problem of marine debris in our world’s oceans. The conference was organized in record time, but you wouldn’t have known it by the participation and enthusiasm levels and for that we, the organizers, thank everyone who contributed, participated, followed us on Twitter or Facebook, or is reading these summary proceedings. We are all looking for ways to apply the information that was exchanged, address new issues that were raised or old issues that were revisited, and are now ready to make a difference in addressing marine debris. As you might imagine, the following summary of proceedings could never be exhaustive and we apologize in advance if your conference highlight is not adequately covered. The dialogue that occurred between participants during the sessions, breaks, receptions, workshops, and field trips was extensive and allowed for an exchange of ideas that we are sure will lead to new projects and new efforts to address marine debris, as well as a reinvigoration of continuous activities.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 International E-Waste Management Network (IEMN) Meeting Report
    2014 International E-Waste Management Network (IEMN) Meeting Report Summary: USEPA, Environmental Protection Administration Taiwan (EPAT) and the Vietnam Environment Administration (VEA) co-hosted the fourth annual meeting of the International E-Waste Management Network (IEMN) from July 14-17, 2014 in Hanoi, Vietnam. Vietnam’s Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources (MONRE) had announced that Vietnam would be hosting this meeting during EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy’s April 2014 mission to Asia. This was the first international activity implemented under Taiwan’s International Environmental Partnership (IEP). In addition to officials from Vietnam, Taiwan and the United States, representatives from Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Japan, Colombia, Argentina, El Salvador, Brazil, Nigeria, Costa Rica, Egypt, Canada, Mexico, Washington State and California joined the meeting. The meeting was opened by MONRE Vice Minister Bui Cach Tuyen, who emphasized the importance of e-waste issues in Vietnam. Barnes Johnson, Director of USEPA’s Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, and Ying-Ying Lai, Deputy Director of EPAT’s Department of Waste Management, also provided opening remarks at this inaugural IEP event. As in previous years, meeting participants exchanged their latest updates related to e-waste management. The primary feature of this year’s IEMN meeting was training on Environmentally Sound Management (ESM) of E-Waste adapted from materials developed by the North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC). These materials were adapted for the IEMN and presented by Michael Vanderpol of Environment Canada and Frineé Cano of Mexico’s Ministry of Environment, both of whom participated in the CEC working group which developed the original training.
    [Show full text]
  • June 7, 2018 Sent Via E-Mail to [email protected]
    James Gunvaldsen Klaassen Suite 520, 1801 Hollis Street Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3J 3N4 Telephone: (902) 417-1700 x 642 Fax: (902) 417-1701 E-Mail: [email protected] File No: 869 June 7, 2018 Sent via E-mail to [email protected] Hon. Catherine McKenna Minister of Environment and Climate Change Environment and Climate Change Canada 200 Sacré-Coeur Boulevard Gatineau QC K1A 0H3 Dear Minister McKenna: Re: Request for Addition of Single-Use Plastics, Microplastics and Microfibers to Priority Substances List Pursuant to s. 76(3) of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 I am writing on behalf of Environmental Defence, Living Oceans, the Toronto Environmental Alliance, Équiterre, the Ecology Action Centre, Greenpeace, the Sierra Club Canada Foundation, the Canadian Environmental Law Association, the Citizens’ Network on Waste Management and the David Suzuki Foundation to request, pursuant to subsection 76(3) of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (“CEPA”), that single-use plastics, microplastics and plastic microfibers be added to the Priority Substances List. This correspondence also serves to bring to the Minister’s attention other legislative provisions in CEPA that may have been triggered and may require action in relation to these classes of substances. We ask you to use the provisions of CEPA as a step toward addressing the plastic pollution threatening Canada’s lands, lakes, rivers and oceans. I. Requestors Environmental Defence (ED) is one of Canada’s most effective environmental action organizations. ED challenges and inspires change in government, business and people to ensure a greener, healthier and prosperous life for all.
    [Show full text]