Geochemistry of Ground Water in Avra Valley, Pima County, Arizona

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geochemistry of Ground Water in Avra Valley, Pima County, Arizona Geochemistry of ground water in Avra Valley, Pima County, Arizona Item Type Thesis-Reproduction (electronic); text Authors Conner, Leslee Lynn,1957- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 01/10/2021 12:48:22 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/191892 GEOCHEMISTRY OF GROUND WATER IN AVRA VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA by Leslee Lynn Conner A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE WITH A MAJOR IN HYDROLOGY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1986 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of re- quirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his or her judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained by the author. SIGNED: APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: gCnrn, Wtt E. S. SIMPSO Date Professor of Hydrology and Water Resources ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am grateful to my advisor, Dr. Eugene S. Simpson for his guidance and laboratory support through the course of this research. I am also indebted to Dr. Austin Long for isotope analyses, and to Drs. Long and Stanley N. Davis for their constructive comments as members of my graduate committee. I gratefully acknowledge the information provided by the City of Tucson Water Department, Arizona Department of Water Resources, U.S. Geological Survey and Jim Posedly. In addition, I extend my gratitude to the City of Tucson and the residents of Avra Valley, who readily and generously allowed me to sample their wells. Heartfelt thanks are due Darcy Campbell, June Fabryka-Martin and Daniel Matthews, who each so generously offered support and guidance, as only dear friends can. I am also grateful to Sally Adams and Harding Lawson Associates for their technical support. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS vi LIST OF TABLES vii ABSTRACT viii 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. AVRA VALLEY 4 Geology 6 Mountains 6 Structure 8 Alluvium 10 Hydrology 12 Climate 12 Surface Water 12 Ground Water 13 Ground-water development 18 Ground-water chemistry 18 Past studies 21 3. METHODS 22 Sampling Program 22 Laboratory Analyses 25 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 27 General Trends in Ground-water Chemistry 27 Ground Water in Southern and Mid Avra Valley 32 Ground Water in Mountain-front Samples 40 Ground Water in Northern Avra Valley 42 Minor Ion Chemistry 43 Potassium 43 Nitrate 44 Fluoride 47 Iodide 50 iv V TABLE OF CONTENTS--Continued Page Stable Isotopes 51 Deuterium and oxygen-18 51 Fractionation 52 Units 53 Isotopes in southern Arizona 53 Isotopes in Avra Valley 54 Equilibrium Approach 56 Saturation indices 57 Mineral stability diagrams 60 5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 65 Recommendations 66 REFERENCES 68 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1. Location of Avra Valley, Arizona 2 2. Avra Valley 5 3. Geology of the Avra Valley area 7 4. Depths to bedrock, Avra Valley 9 5. Depths to water, Avra Valley 15 6. Elevation of the water table and approximate flow lines, Avra Valley 16 7. Transmissivities of the ground water aquifer, Avra Valley 19 8. Location of sampled wells, Avra Valley 23 9. Piper trilinear diagram 31 10. Stiff diagrams 33 11. Bicarbonate - TDS scattergram 36 12. Sodium distribution in Avra Valley 39 13. Nitrate - chloride scattergram 46 14. Fluoride and iodide distribution in Avra Valley 48 15. Isotope ratios of samples from Avra Valley 55 16. Mineral stability diagram for the H20-Al203-K2 0-Si02 system 62 17. Mineral stability diagram for the H20-A103-Na20-Si02 system 63 v i LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Estimated volumes of flow into Avra Valley 17 2. Sampled wells in Avra Valley 24 3. Results of chemical analyses 28 4. Recommended limits for drinking water 29 5. Ca:Na ratios in Avra Valley 38 6. Saturation indices 59 v ii ABSTRACT A geochemical evaluation of the ground water in Avra Valley, Arizona using major ions and the stable isotopes deuterium and oxygen-18 verifies that ground-water recharge from the surrounding mountains is negligible and that most ground water enters the valley as underflow from Altar Valley. Primarily granitic sediments result in soft waters with elevated pH in southern Avra Valley. Increasing sedimentary mineralization in northern reaches produces slightly harder waters. Elevated nitrate in the ground water results from intense local agriculture; uneven distribution of nitrate and corresponding ground-water mounding suggest leakage around irrigation well casings as the primary pathway for nitrates to the ground water. viii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION This report evaluates ground-water geochemistry in Avra Valley, west of Tucson, Arizona (Figure 1). The objectives are to characterize the chemistry of the ground water and to understand the processes which determine the chemistry. In particular, the influence of mountain-front recharge, sediment lithology, and agricultural activity on the chemistry of Avra Valley ground water are examined. In addition, the extent to which ground-water chemistry supports or changes the present understand- ing of ground-water movement in Avra Valley is reviewed. For the study, ground-water samples were collected from Avra Valley and analyzed for major ions, selected minor ions, and stable isotope ratios of hydrogen and oxygen. The chemical results were evaluated with reference to principles of water chemistry and geochemi- cal processes. The value of geochemical investigations of ground water lies in the contributions of such studies to our knowledge of the occurrence and movement of the water in the subsurface environment (see Garrels, 1967; GarrelS and MacKenzie, 1967; Helgeson, 1968). Similar research in southern Arizona has included the Cortaro (Martin, 1980) and Oracle (Winstanley, 1984) areas, San Pedro Valley (Usunoff, 1984; DeWald, 1984), the Santa Rita Mountains (Merz, 1984) and the Tucson Basin (Bostick, 1978; Gallaher, 1979; Thorne, 1982; Olson, 1982; Koglin, 1984; 1 2 0 50 100 MILES Figure 1. Location of Avra Valley, Arizona. 3 and Mohrbacher, 1984). The approach in these studies was similar to that in the present evaluation: characterization of the major ion chemistry of ground water and identification of geochemical trends, often supplemented by use of stable isotopes. Knowledge of the local geology in such studies is helpful, because the composition of the aquifer materials through which the ground water passes plays a major role in the chemistry of the ground water. CHAPTER 2 AVRA VALLEY Avra Valley is a north-trending alluvial basin in south-central Arizona, 12 miles west of the city of Tucson. Covering roughly 520 square miles, the valley extends 40 miles from south of Three Points, Arizona to the Pima-Pinal County line north of Marana (Figure 2). East to west, Avra Valley ranges from 7 to 20 miles (White, Matlock and Schwalen, 1966). The Tucson Mountains form the eastern boundary of Avra Valley, separating it from the Tucson Basin. The Silverbell, Waterman, and Roskruge Mountains bound the valley along the west, and the Sierrita Mountains lie to the south. These mountains are of moderate height, rising up to 2000 feet above the valley floor. The sediments which fill Avra Valley derive from mountains bounding the valley on the east, west and south. The floor of Avra Valley slopes gently to the north with an average gradient of 26 feet per mile, from an elevation of 2550 feet near Three Points to 1950 feet outside Marana. The study area is defined as that portion of Avra Valley lying between the southern line of Township 11 South and State Highway 86 (Figure 2). This area is 23 miles in length and covers approximately 345 square miles. 4 5 R 9 E / \fl io E R 11 E R 12 E I r z -"*/- f-J-r .-"s•• Marana ,,,4 . I-10 1,12. 091.,;6•>._ o te-)7'S ,r 1r TWIN PEAKS o. TERM\ °MOUNTAINS ..-/ / \\ 1... • n n"'"-'".:-.:-. -7-- 7 '‘v\. ( • '• / ' ,, ...-K... / • z. – ;:- f //.„1 k t 13 . ,../. • f 1'..—...( /(•• S. 404, r A-- 4t ( / ( r ( \ 4.1e IT%.4 ) ... +4, \\ ., 4-, ff 1..---. I 1•.- qt • Jf(7,9 .). : : •••Y • ./ / "N stei>. co .."......... 1.7 ,6tae-e.. Three Points 4Z. V- 4 I (c, - \.n • ,/ t• • 4 ERR I TA 0 MILES 5 MC/017AM S SCALE: 1:250,000 Figure 2. Avra Valley. 6 Geology Avra Valley lies in the Basin and Range Lowlands physiographic province which extends across southern Arizona. This province is characterized by predominantly northwest-trending alluvial basins flanked and separated from each other by steeply rising mountains of volcanic origin. The topography of the area is believed to be the result of an extensive period of block-faulting which occurred in Tertiary time, during which down-thrust blocks created grabens roughly parallel to adjacent uplifted mountains. Subsequently, these grabens filled with sediments eroded from the mountain slopes, creating the deep alluvial basins present today (Eberly and Stanley, 1978).
Recommended publications
  • Chiricahua Leopard Frog (Rana Chiricahuensis)
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Chiricahua Leopard Frog (Rana chiricahuensis) Final Recovery Plan April 2007 CHIRICAHUA LEOPARD FROG (Rana chiricahuensis) RECOVERY PLAN Southwest Region U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Albuquerque, New Mexico DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and are sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, state agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director, or Director, as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Literature citation of this document should read as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2007. Chiricahua Leopard Frog (Rana chiricahuensis) Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southwest Region, Albuquerque, NM. 149 pp. + Appendices A-M. Additional copies may be obtained from: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arizona Ecological Services Field Office Southwest Region 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 500 Gold Avenue, S.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Will Dryland Farming Be Feasible in the Avra Valley?
    Will Dryland Farming Be Feasible in the Avra Valley? Item Type text; Article Authors Thacker, Gary Publisher College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Journal Forage and Grain: A College of Agriculture Report Download date 27/09/2021 01:37:37 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/200575 Will Dryland Farming Be Feasible In The Avra Valley? Gary Thacker The increasing cost of water and legal restrictionson its use have caused farmland to be taken out of production in Pima County. In the early 1970's, approximately 50,000acres of farmland were being irrigated in Pima County. This is projected to dropto less than 20,000 acres by 2000 and to virtually zero by 2020 (9). The City of Tucson is the largest owner of retired farmland in thecounty. The city purchased Avra Valley farmland, retired itfrom production, and is now exporting the water for municipaluse.Little natural revegetation has occured in the 10 to 11years since most of the city's land was retired from farm production. The land remains as a huge management problem. Weed controlproblems have resulted in a large expenditure of the city's funds. The land must be mowed periodicallyto keep tumbleweeds from growing and being blown to adjacent agricultural fields, homesites, and roads. The retired farmland has no permanent tenants, thus problems persistwith vandalism, theft, trash dumping, and overgrazing.As of 1981, the City of Tucson was spending about $75,000per year to manage and maintain its Avra Valley holdings with no offsetting returns (4). Jojoba, guayule, buffalo gourd, and tumbleweed biomass productionhave been studied for their feasibility on retired farmland.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Parks & Facilities Swimming Pools
    Marana & Oro Valley GUIDE TO PARKS & FACILITIES SWIMMING POOLS HIKING & TRAILS 1 San Lucas Community Park 16 Honey Bee Canyon Park Marana’s community pool is located at Ora Mae Harn District Park, 13251 OUTDOOR 14040 N. Adonis Rd. 13880 N. Rancho Vistoso Blvd. N. Lon Adams Road. It has long been a favorite way for area residents and Ramadas, ball fields, dog park, volleyball court, Hiking trails, ramadas, restrooms visitors to cool down during the hot summer months. In operation May playground, basketball court, restrooms, shared through September, the pool is open for any and all seeking a great way use path, fitness stations 17 Big Wash Linear Park to relax near the water in a beautiful park setting. A splash pad at Marana Accessible from Oro Valley Marketplace (Tangerine Recreation Heritage River Park, 12205 N. Tangerine Farms Road, features an agrarian WILD BURRO TRAIL Ora Mae Harn District Park 2 Rd. & Oracle Rd.) and from Steam Pump Village theme water features. There is also a splash pad at Crossroads at Silverbell 13250 N. Lon Adams Rd. (Oracle Rd., north of First Ave.) MARANA HERITAGE RIVER PARK brochure & map District Park, 7548 N. Silverbell Road. Hit the trails in Marana with year-round hiking. For stunning views of mountains, plants and wildlife, visit the Ball fields, ramadas, grills, tennis courts, Shared use path, great for walking, running and cycling vast trail network in the Tortolita Mountains, home to the Dove Mountain community and its Ritz-Carlton resort. pickleball courts, basketball courts, swimming The Oro Valley Aquatic Center is located within James D.
    [Show full text]
  • Marana Regional Sports Complex
    Draft Environmental Assessment Marana Regional Sports Complex Town of Marana Pima County, Arizona U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Phoenix Area Office August 2008 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MARANA REGIONAL SPORTS COMPLEX Prepared for Bureau of Reclamation 6150 West Thunderbird Road Glendale, Arizona 85306 Attn: John McGlothlen (623) 773-6256 on behalf of Town of Marana 11555 West Civic Center Drive, Building A2 Marana, Arizona 85653 Attn: Corby Lust Prepared by SWCA Environmental Consultants 2120 North Central Avenue, Suite 130 Phoenix, Arizona 85004 www.swca.com (602) 274-3831 SWCA Project No. 12313 i CONTENTS 1. PURPOSE AND NEED........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Purpose of and Need for the Project .............................................................................................1 1.3 Location........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.4 Public Involvement/Scoping Process ........................................................................................... 1 1.5 Conformance with Comprehensive Plans and Zoning ................................................................. 2 2. DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A STRUCTURAL and GEOCHEMICAL STUDY of the SIERRITA PORPHYRY COPPER SYSTEM, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA Paul William Jensen a Thesis
    A STRUCTURAL AND GEOCHEMICAL STUDY OF THE SIERRITA PORPHYRY COPPER SYSTEM, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA by Paul William Jensen A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1998 2 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his or her judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: -1 ., ./lG+ .. /lf j^.S/ /`¡ÿ FÇ Spencer R. Titley Date// Professor of Geosciences 2 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirementsfor an advanced degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited inthe University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without specialpermission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requestsfor permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole orin part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the GraduateCollege when in his or her judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests ofscholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • Canoa Ranch Groundwater Evaluation
    Canoa Ranch Groundwater Evaluation Hydrologic Evaluation of the Occurrence and Nature of Groundwater, and Water Level Trends and Water Balance Related to Future Water Resource Use in the Canoa Ranch Area, Upper Santa Cruz Basin, Pima County, Arizona By Frank G. Postillion, C.G.W.P. Chief Hydrologist David Scalero, Principal Hydrologist Mark Krieski, P.E. Engineering Manager Pima County Regional Flood Control District Executive Summary The Water Resources Division of the Pima County Regional Flood Control District has conducted a hydrologic evaluation of the Canoa Ranch and vicinity, with a focus on the historical and current water balance and how it has affected local groundwater- level conditions, and the potential impacts on the hydro- and meso-riparian vegetation of the Ranch. Numerous data sources were evaluated during the study, including the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR), Pima County, Pima Association of Governments, and consulting reports. The Canoa Ranch hydrologic study area is centered along the Santa Cruz River (SCR) from the Santa Cruz/Pima County Line in Pima County, Arizona to about 7.5 miles downstream along the River (Figure 1-1). Large portions of the study area along the SCR (4,800 acres) are owned by Pima County as part of the old Canoa Ranch; Elephant Head Road from the South to Santa Rita Springs Development and the Farmers Investment Company (FICO) on the north; from Interstate 19 on the west to the floodplain pediments on the east. The historic Canoa Ranch is undergoing building restoration and is slated for riparian restoration in some targeted areas.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Keystone Peak Prescribed Burn Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-AZ-G020-2015-0009-EA 1 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 8 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 8 1.2 Purpose and Need .................................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Decision to be Made .............................................................................................................................. 11 1.4 Conformance with Land Use Plan .......................................................................................................... 11 1.5 Scoping and Issues ................................................................................................................................ 12 1.5.1 Internal Scoping ................................................................................................................................ 12 1.5.2 External Scoping ............................................................................................................................... 12 1.5.3 Issues Identified ................................................................................................................................ 12 2 DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE ARCHAIC OCCUPATION of the ROSEMONT AREA, NORTHERN SANTA RITA MOUNTAINS, SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA by Bruce B. Huckell K with Cont
    THE ARCHAIC OCCUPATION OF THE ROSEMONT AREA, NORTHERN SANTA RITA MOUNTAINS, SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA by Bruce B. Huckell K with contributions by Lisa W. Huckell Robert S. Thompson Cultural Resource Management Division Arizona State Museum University of Arizona Archaeological Series No. 147, Vol. I THE ARCHAIC OCCUPATION OF THE ROSEMONT AREA, NORTHERN SANTA RITA MOUNTAINS, SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA by Bruce B. Huckell Contributions by Lisa W. Huckell Robert S. Thompson Submitted by Cultural Resource Management Division Arizona State Museum University of Arizona Prepared for ANAMAX Mining Company 1984 Archaeological Series No. 147, Vol. I CONTENTS FIGURES vii TABLES PREFACE xiii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS xvi ABSTRACT xviii Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION 1 The Archaic Period 2 Previous Research 5 2. THE ENVIRONMENT OF THE ROSEMONT AREA AND SURROUNDING REGIONS 11 General Geography 11 Geology 13 Climate 17 Vegetation 19 Fauna 28 The Paleoenvironment 29 Recent Changes in the Local Biotic Communities 30 Long-Term Changes in the Environment 32 3. A FRAMEWORK FOR RESEARCH AT THE ROSEMONT ARCHAIC SITES 35 Hunter-Gatherer Organization 35 Research Domains 38 Problem Domain I: Subsistence-Settlement Systems 38 Problem Domain II: Cultural and Temporal Affinities 40 Site Selection 41 4. INVESTIGATIONS AT AND DESCRIPTIONS OF THE SITES 43 Field Methods 43 Results of Excavations: Site Descriptions 46 AZ EE:2:62--The Wasp Canyon Site 48 Investigation 50 Features 52 Structures 52 Rock Clusters 56 Artifacts 58 iii iv Contents AZ EE:2:65 59 Investigation 59
    [Show full text]
  • Friends Resolution in Opposition of I
    Friends of Saguaro National Park Providing financial and volunteer support for Saguaro National Park Resolution A Resolution of the Board of Director for Friends of Saguaro National Park in opposition to construction of an Interstate 11 corridor alignment through the Avra Valley. Whereas Saguaro National Park was established in 1933 to protect the giant saguaro cactus, and preserve superb examples of the Sonoran Desert ecosystem, while affording unique recreational opportunities for visitors… and today, Saguaro National Park is the number one tourist destination in southern Arizona, providing an economic impact of approximately $75 million per year to the Tucson community: and Whereas the Arizona Department of Transportation is considering and “Interstate 11 and Intermountain West Transportation Corridor” as a means of increasing regional economic development by linking trade with Mexico and Canada: and Whereas the Pima County Administrator has suggested that the proposed Interstate 11 should include a 56-mile section between Casa Grande and Green Valley that would run directly through the Avra Valley, adjacent to Saguaro National Park: and Whereas the suggested corridor would negatively impact thousands of acres of protected public lands, including Saguaro National Park, Ironwood Forest National Monument, Tucson Mountain Park, and the Central Arizona Project’s Tucson Mitigation Corridor: and Whereas this suggested corridor would cut through sensitive habitat recommended for protection by Pima County’s landmark Sonoran Desert Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior
    Vol. 77 Tuesday, No. 54 March 20, 2012 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Listing and Designation of Critical Habitat for the Chiricahua Leopard Frog; Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:12 Mar 19, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\20MRR2.SGM 20MRR2 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES2 16324 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 20, 2012 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Background submitting the critical habitat rules to the Federal Register. Fish and Wildlife Service It is our intent to discuss in this final We published a proposed rule to rule only those topics directly relevant reassess the listing status and propose 50 CFR Part 17 to the listing and development and critical habitat for the Chiricahua designation of critical habitat for the leopard frog in the Federal Register on [Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2010– Chiricahua leopard frog under the Act 0085;4500030114] March 15, 2011 (76 FR 14126) with a (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). For more request for public comments. On RIN 1018–AX12 information on the biology and ecology September 21, 2011, we made available of the Chiricahua leopard frog refer to the draft environmental assessment and Endangered and Threatened Wildlife the final listing rule (67 FR 40790; June draft economic analysis for the and Plants; Listing and Designation of 13, 2002) or our April 2007 final proposed designation of critical habitat Critical Habitat for the Chiricahua recovery plan, which are available from and reopened the public comment on Leopard Frog the Arizona Ecological Services Field the proposed rule (76 FR 58441).
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study for the SANTA CRUZ VALLEY NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA
    Feasibility Study for the SANTA CRUZ VALLEY NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA FINAL Prepared by the Center for Desert Archaeology April 2005 CREDITS Assembled and edited by: Jonathan Mabry, Center for Desert Archaeology Contributions by (in alphabetical order): Linnea Caproni, Preservation Studies Program, University of Arizona William Doelle, Center for Desert Archaeology Anne Goldberg, Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona Andrew Gorski, Preservation Studies Program, University of Arizona Kendall Kroesen, Tucson Audubon Society Larry Marshall, Environmental Education Exchange Linda Mayro, Pima County Cultural Resources Office Bill Robinson, Center for Desert Archaeology Carl Russell, CBV Group J. Homer Thiel, Desert Archaeology, Inc. Photographs contributed by: Adriel Heisey Bob Sharp Gordon Simmons Tucson Citizen Newspaper Tumacácori National Historical Park Maps created by: Catherine Gilman, Desert Archaeology, Inc. Brett Hill, Center for Desert Archaeology James Holmlund, Western Mapping Company Resource information provided by: Arizona Game and Fish Department Center for Desert Archaeology Metropolitan Tucson Convention and Visitors Bureau Pima County Staff Pimería Alta Historical Society Preservation Studies Program, University of Arizona Sky Island Alliance Sonoran Desert Network The Arizona Nature Conservancy Tucson Audubon Society Water Resources Research Center, University of Arizona PREFACE The proposed Santa Cruz Valley National Heritage Area is a big land filled with small details. One’s first impression may be of size and distance—broad valleys rimmed by mountain ranges, with a huge sky arching over all. However, a closer look reveals that, beneath the broad brush strokes, this is a land of astonishing variety. For example, it is comprised of several kinds of desert, year-round flowing streams, and sky island mountain ranges.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulation of Ground-Water Flow and Potential Land Subsidence, Avra Valley, Arizona
    SIMULATION OF GROUND-WATER FLOW AND POTENTIAL LAND SUBSIDENCE, AVRA VALLEY, ARIZONA By R.T. HANSON, S.R. ANDERSON, and D.R. POOL U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 90-4178 Prepared in cooperation with the CITY OF TUCSON Tucson, Arizona December 1990 U.S DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section Federal Building, FB-44 Federal Center, Building 810 300 West Congress Street Box 25425 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1393 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract.......................................................... 1 Introduction...................................................... 1 Hydrogeologic setting............................................. 3 Geology...................................................... 4 Aquifer system............................................... 6 Ground-water development..................................... 9 Simulation of ground-water flow................................... 11 Steady-state simulation...................................... 13 Transient-state simulation................................... 18 Sensitivity analysis......................................... 28 Simulation of potential land subsidence........................... 28 Summary........................................................... 35 Selected references..............................................
    [Show full text]