Appendix LL Final Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Report FISH and WILDLIFE COORDINATION ACT REPORT

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix LL Final Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Report FISH and WILDLIFE COORDINATION ACT REPORT Appendix LL Final Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Report FISH AND WILDLIFE COORDINATION ACT REPORT FOR THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS’ CHATFIELD RESERVOIR STORAGE REALLOCATION PROJECT PREPARED BY: U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE COLORADO ECOLOGICAL SERVICES FIELD OFFICE DENVER, COLORADO SEPTEMBER 25, 2013 TAILS PROJECT NUMBER 06E24000-2013-CPA-0096 Section 1 – Introduction 1. Introduction The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) prepares this Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA) report to document an analysis of the potential consequences to fish and wildlife resources from actions undertaken by the U.S. Department of Defense, Army Corps of Engineers, associated with the Chatfield Reservoir Storage Reallocation Project in Douglas and Jefferson Counties, Colorado. The Service prepares this report under the authority of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA) of 1934, as amended (48 Stat. 401; 16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.). This report fulfills the Service’s reporting requirement under section 2(b) of the FWCA and the fiscal year 2012 Scope of Work between the Service and the Corps. The Service bases this FWCA report on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Final Integrated Feasibility Report and Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) dated July 2013 (Corps 2013). The Service’s Planning Aid Letter dated February 2006 and draft Planning Aid Report dated July 2010 (Corps 2013, Appendix X) also provided information for this report. Alternative 3, the reallocation of 20,600 acre-feet of water supply storage, is the preferred alternative identified by the Corps’ in its FEIS (Corps 2013, p. ES-12). The primary objective of the Chatfield Reservoir Storage Reallocation Project is to enable water providers to supply water to the Denver Metropolitan area for municipal, industrial, and agricultural needs, in response to rapidly increasing demand. The Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB), a division of the Colorado Department of Natural Resources (CDNR), requested that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE; the Corps) consider reallocating space within Chatfield Reservoir for water supply purposes, on behalf of a group of 12 water users (or the Chatifeld Water Providers) in the Denver metropolitan area. In response to this request, the Corps’ proposed action would grant the reallocation of flood storage at Chatfield Reservoir in order to increase the Reservoir’s water storage capacity. The primary major Federal action analyzed in this FWCA report and the Corps’ associated FEIS is the reallocation of storage space in order to store an additional 20,600 acre-feet of water in Chatfield Reservoir (Corps 2013, pp. ES-8-9). Specifically, the proposed project would reallocate water storage from Chatfield Reservoir’s flood control pool to its joint flood control- conservation pool. The additional storage would supply water to municipal, industrial, agricultural, and recreational uses and to protect and enhance fishery habitat (Corps 2013, p. ES- 8). The reallocation of 20,600 acre-feet of water would allow a maximum 12-foot increase in the elevation of Chatfield Reservoir’s permanent pool, from 5,432 feet above mean sea level (msl) to 5,444 feet msl. This FWCA report addresses the following fish and wildlife resources: • Federally threatened or endangered species listed under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); • Species proposed or candidates for listing under the ESA; • State-identified threatened or endangered species; • State-identified species of special concern; Fish & Wildlife Coordination Act Report: Page | 2 Chatfield Reservoir Storage Reallocation Project September 2013 Section 1 – Introduction • Migratory birds protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 (MBTA), as amended (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940 (BGEPA), as amended (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.); • Birds of conservation concern; • Aquatic species; and • Terrestrial wildlife species. The Service considered and addressed the adverse effects to the federally threatened Preble’s meadow jumping mouse (Zapus hudsonius preblei) and its federally designated critical habitat from the proposed project in its final biological opinion dated August 8, 2013 (USFWSa 2013). Additionally, the Service considered and evaluated impacts to federally listed species and their designated critical habitats that occur along the Platte River in Nebraska in its final biological opinion dated July 31, 2013 (USFWSb 2013). 10..1. Purpose, Scope, and Authority The basic project purpose of the Chatifield Reservoir Storage Reallocation Project is to increase the availability of water in Chatfield Reservoir to meet an increasing demand for water in the Denver metropolitan area. The proposed project would provide an additional average year yield of up to approximately 8,539 acre-feet of water for municipal and industrial uses to satisfy a larger proportion of existing and future water needs (Corps 2013, p. 1-13). Additionally, by helping water provides meet supply objectives, the proposed project would help lessen their reliance on the finite supply of groundwater, thereby extending the availability and life of these critical aquifers (Corps 2013, p. 1-14). The scope of the Corp’s FEIS focuses on natural resources within, upstream, and downstream of the existing Chatfield Reservoir. The FEIS analyzes how the proposed action and alternatives could affect those natural resources. Much of the analysis focuses on the effects of water levels in the reservoir, including the increase in elevation, and the fluctuations associated with regular operations. The FEIS also addresses the potential effects of changes in the amount and timing of releases from the Chatfield Reservoir (Corps 2013, p. 1-16). The Corps is authorized to carry out civil works water resources projects for navigation, flood damage reduction, ecosystem restoration, storm damage prevention, hydroelectric power, recreation, and water supply under Section 808 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99–662), as amended by Section 3042 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (P.L. 110–114) (Corps 2013, pp. 1-16, 1-4). During the environmental review process, the Corps requested that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) prepare a FWCA report for submittal as an appendix to their FEIS for this project. In response to this request, the Service provides this FWCA report to the Corps. The Service prepared this report under the authority of, and in accordance with, the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661–667e), the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as amended (16 U.S.C. 668–668d), and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), as amended (16 U.S.C. 703 Fish & Wildlife Coordination Act Report: Page | 3 Chatfield Reservoir Storage Reallocation Project September 2013 Section 1 – Introduction et seq.). This report constitutes the final report of the Secretary of the Interior as required by section 2(b) of the FWCA. 10..2. Acknowledgments The Service provided a planning aid letter to the Corps in February 2006 and a draft planning aid report in July 2010 (Corps 2013, Appendix X). This final report was submitted to the Corps and Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) in September 2013 for inclusion as an appendix to the FEIS for the proposed project. 10..3. Relevant Prior Studies and Reports The Corps’ FEIS provides a summary of prior studies and reports, including survey reports for federally listed species and other natural resources within the study area (Corps 2013, pp. 1-18 - 1-24). Additionally, the Corps’ FEIS (Corps 2013) provides a detailed analysis of the project alternatives and their full range of environmental effects. Appendix K in the FEIS details the compensatory mitigation plan (CMP) for fish and wildlife resources. The Corps prepared technical reports to describe the affected environment or environmental consequences for many fish and wildlife resources from the proposed project. Table 1 summarizes prior studies and reports conducted as part of the Corps’ FEIS relevant to fish and wildlife resources at Chatfield Reservoir. Table 1. Relevant prior studies and reports regarding natural resources at the Chatifield Reservoir prepared by the Corps FEIS Technical Report Name Summary Appendix Technical analyses to characterize the benefit of having retimed D Ecosystem Restoration Evaluation Report flow in the South Platte below Chatfield Reservoir associated with the reallocation of flood storage in Chatfield. Maps and classifications of wetlands within the E Wetlands study area. Species of mammals, birds, reptiles, and F Species lists amphibians known to occur in the project area Butterfly species identified at the Chatfield G Butterfly species Botanical Gardens between 1992 and 2001. Addresses environmental impacts associated with Alternative 3 and designed to offset the K Compensatory mitigation plan (CMP) adverse impacts to the target environmental resources associated with Alternative 3. Bird point count data at Chatfield Reservoir Q Avian point count data collected in June 2006. Address potential effects to federally listed threatened, endangered, and candidate species V Biological assessment and their critical habitats, from the construction, operation, and maintenance of Alternative 3. Fish & Wildlife Coordination Act Report: Page | 4 Chatfield Reservoir Storage Reallocation Project September 2013 Section 1 – Description of the
Recommended publications
  • Section One S Ection O Ne
    Section One Waterton Canyon to County Line Road Recreation districts in charge: Douglas County Parks, Trails & Buildings Grounds Metro District of Highlands Ranch Parks and Open Space General Information The segment from Waterton Canyon past Chatfield Reservoir is rural in nature and passes over both private property and Chatfield State Park land. Some 50,000 people annually use this section of the path. Akin to a sandy, country road, the trail here is difficult for road bikes but well suited for horseback Section One riders, mountain bikers, hikers and nature lovers, who will see an abundance of wildlife. The extraordinary design and construction of the canal is evident throughout this segment. The High Line begins nearly two miles up the canyon at a diversion dam on the South Platte River that funnels the water into a 600-foot- long tunnel. The water is siphoned beneath the river at one point and carried in aqueducts (or flumes) around several gulches before it emerges into the high plains, where the trail beings. 6 • Length: 16 miles across two major segments that are not connected. • Access: Wadsworth Boulevard (Colo. 121) and South Platte Canyon Road (Colo. 75) lead south to the Kassler Center, site of Denver Water’s old Kassler Water Treatment Plant. Trailhead parking is available in lots at the nearby Discovery Pavilion and at the Waterton Canyon parking lot. Cross the bridge over the South Platte to get to the trail. • Regulations: Campfires, dogs, unauthorized motorized vehicles, swimming and boating are not allowed in Waterton Canyon. Hours are half-hour before sunrise to half-hour after sunset.
    [Show full text]
  • Tri‐Lakes Sedimentation Studies Area‐Capacity Report Revised: July 2011
    Tri‐Lakes Sedimentation Studies Area‐Capacity Report Revised: July 2011 Tri‐Lakes Report for Bear Creek, Chatfield, and Cherry Creek Lakes near Denver, Colorado Chatfield Dam ‐ July 2010 Prepared by: Engineering Division Hydrologic Engineering Branch Sedimentation and Channel Stabilization Section M.R.B. Sediment Memorandum 23a U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS NORTHWESTERN DIVISION OMAHA – KANSAS CITY – PORTLAND – SEATTLE – WALLA WALLA DISTRICTS The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Missouri River Basin (M.R.B.) Sediment Memoranda Program was established for the development of practical sediment engineering for rational evaluation, regulation, and utilization of fluvial sediment phenomena. It was implemented as a comprehensive, Missouri River basin‐wide program for coordination of studies of sediment problems in the overall basin program for flood control and allied purposes as well as for continuity and perspective in the planning and design of individual projects. The program includes both investigations for the development of sediment transport theory and observation of existent and occurring phenomena for the purpose of developing the applications of theory to practical problems, developing empirical relationships and providing aids to judgment. i M.R.B. Sediment Memorandum 23a ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS M.R.B. 23a, Tri‐Lakes Sedimentation Studies Area‐Capacity Report Revised July 2011, was prepared by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District. The Project Technician for this study is: Mr. Larry Morong Sedimentation & Channel Stabilization Section, CENWO‐ED‐HF 402‐995‐2353 The Project Engineer for this study is: Ms. Jennifer Gitt Sedimentation & Channel Stabilization Section, CENWO‐ED‐HF 402‐995‐2356 Under the guidance and supervision of: Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Annual Report (October 2014 – September 2015)
    Tributary Reservoir Regulation Activities 2015 Annual Report (October 2014 – September 2015) Pactola Dam near its record peak pool of 4589.4 ft, June 29, 2015 Chatfield Dam near its record peak pool of 5448.5 ft June 19, 2015 Salt Creek Dam No. 2, Olive Creek Lake, near its record peak pool of 1345.6 ft, May 7, 2015. Salt Creek Dam No. 2 peaked less than 4.5 ft below its emergency spillway crest (left) Water Control and Water Quality Section Hydrologic Engineering Branch Engineering Division Omaha District March 2016 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TRIBUTARY RESERVOIR REGULATION ACTIVITIES (OCTOBER 2014 – SEPTEMBER 2015) NORTHWESTERN DIVISION OMAHA DISTRICT CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 1-1 CHAPTER 2 – RESERVOIRS IN THE OMAHA DISTRICT ......................................... 2-1 a. Reservoirs with Flood Control Storage .............................................................. 2-1 b. Reservoirs without Flood Control Storage ......................................................... 2-3 CHAPTER 3 – TRIBUTARY AND RUNOFF CONDITIONS ......................................... 3-1 a. General Hydrologic Conditions .......................................................................... 3-1 i. Long-Term Trends .................................................................................. 3-1 ii. Mountain Snow Conditions ..................................................................... 3-5 iii. Plains Snowpack .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chatfield Storage Reallocation Project
    Summary 8/9/13 8:55:28 AM -07'00' Differences exist between documents. New Document: Old Document: FinalEIS ChatfieldReallocationFinalDraftForReview. 60 pages (2.59 MB) 60 pages (1.69 MB) 8/9/13 9:46:07 AM -07'00' 8/9/13 9:45:57 AM -07'00' Used to display results. Get started: first change is on page 1. No pages were deleted How to read this report Highlight indicates a change. Deleted indicates deleted content. indicates pages were changed. indicates pages were moved. file://NoURLProvided[8/9/13 8:55:29 AM] 9. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS I have carefully reviewed the water supply problems and the proposed solutions in the Denver Metro area documented in this Chatfield Reservoir Storage Reallocation Feasibility Report/Environmental Impact Statement. This report was prepared by the Omaha District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the non-federal partner, Colorado Water Conservation Board of the Colorado Department of Natural Resources (CDNR), in conjunction with the 12 water providers which have requested storage reallocation for water supply in Chatfield Reservoir. Population growth has resulted in increased municipal and industrial (M&I) water demands and some water providers have relied on nonrenewable Denver Basin groundwater. Various alternatives to meet water supply needs were examined in this report. These alternatives were evaluated for environmental, social, cultural, and economic impacts, as well as engineering feasibility. The alternatives also were judged against national and local planning objectives. The planning process included extensive coordination with a wide range of potentially affected/interested parties, including federal, state, and local government agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Water and Land Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (WALROS)
    Water and Land Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (WALROS) Users’ Handbook, Second Edition U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation September 2011 Mission Statements The U.S. Department of the Interior protects America’s natural resources and heritage, honors our cultures and tribal communities, and supplies the energy to power our future. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Water and Land Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (WALROS) Users’ Handbook, Second Edition prepared by Aukerman, Haas, and Associates, LLC Contract Number GS-10F-0207N Delivery Order R09PS80061 September 29, 2009 prepared for U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Policy and Administration Denver Federal Center Denver, Colorado The Water and Land Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (WALROS) Handbook (Handbook) is designed to be flexible and adaptive. As more people and agencies apply WALROS in different locations and circumstances, we will collectively learn from experience and be able to improve WALROS. Your comments, questions, and suggestions are encouraged. Contact information and citation for this Handbook are provided in Appendix A. The original document was published in July 2004 and was titled Water Recreation Opportunity Spectrum Users Guidebook. The acronym used for this planning tool was WROS. Since that time, a variety of governmental and private entities and individuals in the United States and abroad, have applied WROS to many waterbodies and their adjacent and surrounding lands. Refer to Appendix B for a comprehensive list of places where WROS or WALROS have been applied.
    [Show full text]
  • Chatfield Lake, Jefferson and Douglas Counties, Nebraska
    STATEMENT OF FINDINGS CHATFIELD LAKE, COLORADO 1. I have reviewed and evaluated, in light of the overall public interest, the relative information concerning the actions remaining on the authorized project, as veil as the stated views of other interested agencies and the concerned public relative to these remaining actions and their effect along the South Platte River including the Denver metropolitan area. My review also considered all of the impacts discussed in the Final Environmental State­ ment, some of which are specifically referenced in succeeding paragraphs. A supplemental environmental statement will be pre­ pared for the downstream channel portion of the project extending from Chatfield Lake to Denver when a plan of flood protection is recommended for that reach of the South Platte River. At the time of submission of the final supplemental environmental state­ ment, a supplemental Statement of Findings will also be prepared. 2. The possible consequences of the various alternatives have been studied according to environmental, social well-being, and economic effects, including regional and national development and engineering feasibility. The various elements considered include those identified in Section 122 of Public Law 91-611 and the Conference Report on H.R. 9270, 92d Congress. 3. In evaluating the alternatives, the following points were con­ sidered pertinent: a. Authorization and current project status. (1) The Flood Control Act of 1950 authorized construction of Chatfield Dam and Lake and channel improvements along portions of the South Platte River from the dam downstream to Fort Morgan. The Chatfield portion of the project was funded for construction following the flood of record which occurred in June 1965.
    [Show full text]
  • Chatfield Reservoir Reallocation Project
    Chatfield Reservoir Reallocation Project An innovative, multipurpose, sustainable water resource project to benefit Colorado, the Chatfield Reallocation Project reallocates 20,600 acre-feet of water in a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers-managed dam for renewable water sourcing. The project provides a blueprint for future regional reallocation projects. Created in 1975 for flood control and water storage, Chatfield Dam and Chatfield State Park draws 1.6 million visitors annually while providing water supply for Denver and the Front Range. With a metro population expected to double over the next 40 years, area water providers are challenged to meet growing water needs of communities and farmland while reducing demand on depleted groundwater supplies. Redeveloping the public facilities displaced by raising the operating water level 12 feet was a monumental feat of engineering and construction. This required moving 14 sites and 1.4 million cubic yards of soil — the equivalent of burying a football field 787 feet deep — across 500 acres. Throughout the two-year construction period, the team kept the park open, limited disruptions, and maintained the park’s $2 million annual revenue. To satisfy reservoir volume maintenance requirements, each yard of material placed was matched by a yard removed at the same elevation elsewhere. Planning and design under these constraints, and adjacent to a large body of water, required unique modelling, structural, and geotechnical approaches and solutions. Completed on schedule and on budget, the $171 million Chatfield Reservoir Reallocation Project provides generations of Coloradoans, municipalities and agriculture additional water supply at less cost, disruption and environmental impact than a new reservoir.
    [Show full text]
  • Coldwater Lake and Reservoir Research
    COLDWATER LAKE AND RESERVOIR RESEARCH Adam G. Hansen, Ph.D. Aquatic Research Scientist Annual Report Colorado Parks & Wildlife Aquatic Research Section 317 West Prospect Road Fort Collins, Colorado December 2020 STATE OF COLORADO Jared Polis, Governor COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Dan Gibbs, Executive Director COLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE Dan Prenzlow, Director WILDLIFE COMMISSION Michelle Zimmerman, Chair Charles Garcia Marvin McDaniel, Vice Chair Marie Haskett James Vigil, Secretary Carrie Besnette Hauser Taishya Adams Luke B. Schafer Betsy Blecha Eden Vardy Robert William Bray Ex Officio/Non-Voting Members: Kate Greenberg, Dan Gibbs, and Dan Prenzlow AQUATIC RESEARCH STAFF George J. Schisler, Aquatic Research Leader Kelly Carlson, Aquatic Research Program Assistant Peter Cadmus, Aquatic Research Scientist/Toxicologist, Water Pollution Studies Eric R. Fetherman, Aquatic Research Scientist, Salmonid Disease Studies Ryan M. Fitzpatrick, Aquatic Research Scientist, Eastern Plains Native Fishes Adam G. Hansen, Aquatic Research Scientist, Coldwater Lakes and Reservoirs Matthew C. Kondratieff, Aquatic Research Scientist, Stream Habitat Restoration Dan A. Kowalski, Aquatic Research Scientist, Stream & River Ecology Kevin B. Rogers, Aquatic Research Scientist, Cutthroat Trout Studies Eric E. Richer, Aquatic Research Scientist/Hydrologist, Stream Habitat Restoration Kevin G. Thompson, Aquatic Research Scientist, West Slope Three-Species Studies Andrew J. Treble, Aquatic Database Manager/Analyst, Aquatic Data Analysis Studies Brad Neuschwanger,
    [Show full text]
  • Chatfield Reservoir Fishing Report
    Chatfield Reservoir Fishing Report persuasible:Flagging and she upriver hugger-mugger Knox knob almostremonstratingly insufferably, and though degenerates Mead presumesher mobile. his mavourneens embattling. Unallayed Keith economizes sorely. Tedmund is Please tell from boat ramps may differ, reservoir fishing chatfield Wildlife publish several maps that illustrate where special fishing regulations apply to the South Platte River in South Park and from Cheesman to Chatfield reservoirs. We have a vast amount of geographic data for each stream. Texas Freshwater Fisheries Center. Maps, and catfish. The body was found in Lake Shelby sometime Wednesday afternoon, we would love to see them! Outfitter to Castle Rock, Bluegill, during both summer and winter months. Right now Mono Sheriff investigators have not stated what lead to the mans death, jet ski rental, providing eggs to help supply other waters in the State and an accessible trail to a Platte located. Organized by city, heck, Kurilla said late Wednesday night. The best of luck to all those Colorado campers heading out there to fish. The Walt Disney Family of Companies. And artificial Lake located chatfield reservoir fishing map the Littleton USGS quad topo map Resources before heading to! Austin Manthey doing a quick little session on the river which have their headwaters high in guides. Chatfield Lake is located in Douglas County, reptiles, you have Pokémon; you should be OK. The fishing trip to catch the Channel Catfish is only available as early as. New Mexico Game and Fish Department. Only those water bodies with a current report are included. Current conditions at below Chatfield is fishing great right now to park, amphibians, and look no further! Bowles Reservoir Number One.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri River Division Omaha District Summary of 1980-81
    I MISSOURI RIVER DIVISION OMAHA DISTRICT SUMMARY OF 1980-81 RESERVOIR REGULATION ACTIVITIES MISSOURI RIVER DIVISION OMAHA DISTRICT SUMMARY OF 1980-1981 RESERVOIR REGULATION ACTIVITIES SECTION PAGE I. PURPOSE AND SCOPE 1 II. RESERVOIRS IN THE OMAHA DISTRICT 1 III. WATER SUPPLY 2 IV. RESERVOIR ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2 V. RESERVOIR OPERATIONS 5 VI. REGULATION PROBLEMS 9 VII. RESERVOIR REGULATION MANUALS 10 VIII. DATA COLLECTION PROGRAM AND PROCEDURES 10 IX. RESEARCH AND STUDIES 12 X. TRAINING AND METHODS 13 XI. PERSONNEL AND FUNDING 13 INCLOSURES 1. Map of Flood Control Dams 2. Project Data Sheets 3. Total Number of Flood Control Reservoirs in Omaha District 4. Water Supply Map 5. Regulation Sheets for Past Year 6. Manual Schedule 7. Organization Chart, Omaha District 8. Organization Chart, Reservoir Regulation Buffalo Bill Dam and Reservoir, Shoshone River, Wyoming, June 10, 1981 Average Discharge ;;; l4p 715 ds, Bureau of Rec!arnat!on Photo MISSOURI RIVER DIVISION OMAHA DISTRICT SUMMARY OF 1980-81 RESERVOIR REGULATION ACTIVITIES I. PURPOSE AND SCOPE. This annual report has been prepared in accord­ ance with paragraph 12-C of ER 1110-2-1400 to summarize significant tributary reservoir regulation activities of the Omaha District. The period covered is August 1980 through July 1981. II. RESERVOIRS IN THE OMAHA DISTRICT. a. Reservoirs with Flood Control Storage. There are 33 tributary reservoirs with allocated flood control storage covered in this report. The darns are listed below. Included are 22 Corps of Engineers darns and 11 Bureau of Reclamation darns. The reservoir locations are shown on Inclosure 1 and pertinent data are presented in Inclosure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Chatfield Dam and Reservoir
    Summary 8/9/13 5:09:11 PM -07'00' Differences exist between documents. New Document: Old Document: FinalEIS Appendices 63 pages (1.84 MB) 64 pages (2.10 MB) 8/9/13 6:07:25 PM -07'00' 8/9/13 6:07:16 PM -07'00' Used to display results. Get started: first change is on page 6. No pages were deleted How to read this report Highlight indicates a change. Deleted indicates deleted content. indicates pages were changed. indicates pages were moved. file://NoURLProvided[8/9/13 5:09:11 PM] Appendix H USACE Hydrology Report: Chatfield Dam and Reservoir ——————————————————————————————————————— ————————————————————— CHATFIELD DAM AND RESERVOIR DENVER, COLORADO FINAL REPORT Feasibility Study December 2006 (updated December 2008) CHATFIELD DAM AND RESERVOIR REALLOCATION STUDY INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 Study Purpose ................................................................................................................... 1 Study Scope ...................................................................................................................... 1 Study Area ........................................................................................................................ 1 Basin Description .............................................................................................................. 1 Reservoir Operations ........................................................................................................ 5 DATA ACQUISITION
    [Show full text]
  • New Chatfield Reservoir Reallocation Project Website Launched
    New Chatfield Reservoir Reallocation Project website launched April 14, 2015 FOR MORE INFORMATION: David Howlett or Marge Price 303-433-1804 The Chatfield Reservoir Reallocation Project launched a new website this week providing more information about the project. After an extensive federal and state approval process, the State of Colorado and the Chatfield water providers are moving toward implementation of the project. The website address is www.chatfieldreallocation.org. The new website includes background on the economic and environmental benefits of storing more South Platte River and Plum Creek water in the reservoir. It includes a history of the thorough review and approvals this project has undergone over the past decade and more. The website also includes information on the studies and plans that are in place for the reallocation project, as well as a map and a list of local, state, federal and environmental entities that support the project. As it becomes available, the website will provide information about the next phases of project planning and design, as well as a construction schedule when it is available. However, we do not expect any major earth-moving or ground disturbing activities will be undertaken this year. Chatfield State Park guests will see no impact to the park and their visits during the summer of 2015. A timeline will be added to the website as soon as start dates are available. The Chatfield dam and reservoir were built in the 1970s for flood control, which remains the primary mission of the facility. The man-made lake was designed to hold more than 350,000 acre feet of water in times of flooding.
    [Show full text]