DOCSLIB.ORG

Tri‐Lakes Sedimentation Studies Area‐Capacity Report Revised: July 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tri‐Lakes Sedimentation Studies Area‐Capacity Report Revised: July 2011 Tri‐Lakes Sedimentation Studies Area‐Capacity Report Revised: July 2011 Tri‐Lakes Report for Bear Creek, Chatfield, and Cherry Creek Lakes near Denver, Colorado Chatfield Dam ‐ July 2010 Prepared by: Engineering Division Hydrologic Engineering Branch Sedimentation and Channel Stabilization Section M.R.B. Sediment Memorandum 23a U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS NORTHWESTERN DIVISION OMAHA – KANSAS CITY – PORTLAND – SEATTLE – WALLA WALLA DISTRICTS The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Missouri River Basin (M.R.B.) Sediment Memoranda Program was established for the development of practical sediment engineering for rational evaluation, regulation, and utilization of fluvial sediment phenomena. It was implemented as a comprehensive, Missouri River basin‐wide program for coordination of studies of sediment problems in the overall basin program for flood control and allied purposes as well as for continuity and perspective in the planning and design of individual projects. The program includes both investigations for the development of sediment transport theory and observation of existent and occurring phenomena for the purpose of developing the applications of theory to practical problems, developing empirical relationships and providing aids to judgment. i M.R.B. Sediment Memorandum 23a ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS M.R.B. 23a, Tri‐Lakes Sedimentation Studies Area‐Capacity Report Revised July 2011, was prepared by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District. The Project Technician for this study is: Mr. Larry Morong Sedimentation & Channel Stabilization Section, CENWO‐ED‐HF 402‐995‐2353 The Project Engineer for this study is: Ms. Jennifer Gitt Sedimentation & Channel Stabilization Section, CENWO‐ED‐HF 402‐995‐2356 Under the guidance and supervision of: Mr. Daniel Pridal P.E., Chief Sedimentation & Channel Stabilization Section, CENWO‐ED‐HF 402‐995‐2336 ii M.R.B. Sediment Memorandum 23a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of the Tri‐Lakes Report is to document changes in the storage capacity of the Tri‐Lakes between the original and subsequent surveys. The Tri‐Lakes are located in the Denver metro area and consist of Bear Creek Lake, Chatfield Lake, and Cherry Creek Lake. Gross storage capacity in Bear Creek Lake has decreased from the original capacity of 78,101 acre‐feet in 1980 to 77,293 acre‐feet in 2009, the year of the latest sediment range line survey. This amounts to a total storage reduction of 808 acre‐feet, or an average depletion rate of 27.9 acre‐feet per year. The original projected storage depletion rate for Bear Creek Lake was approximately 20 acre‐feet per year. The Bear Creek Lake flood control pool storage capacity has decreased from of 28,762 acre‐feet in 1980 to 28,514 acre‐feet in 2009, an average of 8.6 acre‐feet per year. Gross storage capacity in Chatfield Lake has decreased from the original capacity of 351,378 acre‐feet in 1977 to 349,454 acre‐feet in 2010, the year of the latest sediment range line survey. This amounts to a total storage reduction of 1,924 acre‐feet, or an average depletion rate of 58.3 acre‐feet per year. The original projected storage depletion rate for Chatfield Lake was approximately 200 acre‐feet per year. The Chatfield Lake flood control pool storage capacity has decreased from 206,856 acre‐feet in 1977 to 205,985 acre‐feet in 2010, an average of 26.4 acre‐feet per year. Gross storage capacity in Cherry Creek Lake has decreased from the original capacity of 248,318 acre‐feet in 1950 to 243,757 acre‐feet in 2009 (the 2009 sediment range line survey is a composite of data collected in 2006, 2007, and 2009). This amounts to a total storage reduction of 4,561 acre‐feet, or an average depletion rate of 77.3 acre‐feet per year. The original projected storage depletion rate for Cherry Creek Lake was approximately 151 acre‐ feet per year. The Cherry Creek Lake flood control pool storage capacity has decreased from 80,638 acre‐feet in 1950 to 79,294 acre‐feet in 2009, an average of 22.8 acre‐feet per year. Although deposition has not significantly impacted storage capacity, sediment related impacts within the Tri‐ Lakes have occurred. Impacted areas include the Plum Creek tributary arm within Chatfield Lake and potential long term impacts from the Hayman fire of 2002. iii M.R.B. Sediment Memorandum 23a Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................................................................... IV LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................................................. V LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................................................................. VII APPENDICES .................................................................................................................................................................. VII 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................... 1‐1 1.1 PURPOSE .......................................................................................................................................................................1‐1 1.2 SCOPE OF WORK .............................................................................................................................................................1‐1 1.3 AUTHORIZATION .............................................................................................................................................................1‐1 1.4 SEDIMENT RELATED PROBLEMS .........................................................................................................................................1‐1 2 GENERAL INFORMATION ..................................................................................................................................... 2‐2 2.1 STUDY AREA ..................................................................................................................................................................2‐2 2.2 GEOGRAPHY & TOPOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................................................2‐3 2.2.1 Bear Creek .........................................................................................................................................................2‐3 2.2.2 Chatfield ............................................................................................................................................................2‐3 2.2.3 Cherry Creek ......................................................................................................................................................2‐3 2.3 CLIMATE .......................................................................................................................................................................2‐4 2.4 SURVEY HISTORY .............................................................................................................................................................2‐5 2.4.1 Cross Section Labeling System ...........................................................................................................................2‐6 2.4.2 New Survey Metadata .......................................................................................................................................2‐6 2.5 SOURCE & DISTRIBUTION OF DEPOSITS ...............................................................................................................................2‐8 2.6 AREA‐CAPACITY ..............................................................................................................................................................2‐9 2.6.1 Computations ....................................................................................................................................................2‐9 2.6.2 Area‐Capacity Tables .........................................................................................................................................2‐9 3 BEAR CREEK LAKE ................................................................................................................................................ 3‐1 3.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................................3‐1 3.2 SURFACE AREA ...............................................................................................................................................................3‐1 3.3 CAPACITY CHANGES .........................................................................................................................................................3‐1 3.4 PROFILE PLOTS ...............................................................................................................................................................3‐3 3.5 SEDIMENT VOLUME .........................................................................................................................................................3‐3 3.6 AREA‐CAPACITY TABLES ...................................................................................................................................................3‐3 3.7 CROSS SECTION DATA ......................................................................................................................................................3‐3
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Section One S Ection O Ne
    Section One Waterton Canyon to County Line Road Recreation districts in charge: Douglas County Parks, Trails & Buildings Grounds Metro District of Highlands Ranch Parks and Open Space General Information The segment from Waterton Canyon past Chatfield Reservoir is rural in nature and passes over both private property and Chatfield State Park land. Some 50,000 people annually use this section of the path. Akin to a sandy, country road, the trail here is difficult for road bikes but well suited for horseback Section One riders, mountain bikers, hikers and nature lovers, who will see an abundance of wildlife. The extraordinary design and construction of the canal is evident throughout this segment. The High Line begins nearly two miles up the canyon at a diversion dam on the South Platte River that funnels the water into a 600-foot- long tunnel. The water is siphoned beneath the river at one point and carried in aqueducts (or flumes) around several gulches before it emerges into the high plains, where the trail beings. 6 • Length: 16 miles across two major segments that are not connected. • Access: Wadsworth Boulevard (Colo. 121) and South Platte Canyon Road (Colo. 75) lead south to the Kassler Center, site of Denver Water’s old Kassler Water Treatment Plant. Trailhead parking is available in lots at the nearby Discovery Pavilion and at the Waterton Canyon parking lot. Cross the bridge over the South Platte to get to the trail. • Regulations: Campfires, dogs, unauthorized motorized vehicles, swimming and boating are not allowed in Waterton Canyon. Hours are half-hour before sunrise to half-hour after sunset.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Annual Report (October 2014 – September 2015)
    Tributary Reservoir Regulation Activities 2015 Annual Report (October 2014 – September 2015) Pactola Dam near its record peak pool of 4589.4 ft, June 29, 2015 Chatfield Dam near its record peak pool of 5448.5 ft June 19, 2015 Salt Creek Dam No. 2, Olive Creek Lake, near its record peak pool of 1345.6 ft, May 7, 2015. Salt Creek Dam No. 2 peaked less than 4.5 ft below its emergency spillway crest (left) Water Control and Water Quality Section Hydrologic Engineering Branch Engineering Division Omaha District March 2016 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TRIBUTARY RESERVOIR REGULATION ACTIVITIES (OCTOBER 2014 – SEPTEMBER 2015) NORTHWESTERN DIVISION OMAHA DISTRICT CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 1-1 CHAPTER 2 – RESERVOIRS IN THE OMAHA DISTRICT ......................................... 2-1 a. Reservoirs with Flood Control Storage .............................................................. 2-1 b. Reservoirs without Flood Control Storage ......................................................... 2-3 CHAPTER 3 – TRIBUTARY AND RUNOFF CONDITIONS ......................................... 3-1 a. General Hydrologic Conditions .......................................................................... 3-1 i. Long-Term Trends .................................................................................. 3-1 ii. Mountain Snow Conditions ..................................................................... 3-5 iii. Plains Snowpack .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chatfield Storage Reallocation Project
    Summary 8/9/13 8:55:28 AM -07'00' Differences exist between documents. New Document: Old Document: FinalEIS ChatfieldReallocationFinalDraftForReview. 60 pages (2.59 MB) 60 pages (1.69 MB) 8/9/13 9:46:07 AM -07'00' 8/9/13 9:45:57 AM -07'00' Used to display results. Get started: first change is on page 1. No pages were deleted How to read this report Highlight indicates a change. Deleted indicates deleted content. indicates pages were changed. indicates pages were moved. file://NoURLProvided[8/9/13 8:55:29 AM] 9. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS I have carefully reviewed the water supply problems and the proposed solutions in the Denver Metro area documented in this Chatfield Reservoir Storage Reallocation Feasibility Report/Environmental Impact Statement. This report was prepared by the Omaha District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the non-federal partner, Colorado Water Conservation Board of the Colorado Department of Natural Resources (CDNR), in conjunction with the 12 water providers which have requested storage reallocation for water supply in Chatfield Reservoir. Population growth has resulted in increased municipal and industrial (M&I) water demands and some water providers have relied on nonrenewable Denver Basin groundwater. Various alternatives to meet water supply needs were examined in this report. These alternatives were evaluated for environmental, social, cultural, and economic impacts, as well as engineering feasibility. The alternatives also were judged against national and local planning objectives. The planning process included extensive coordination with a wide range of potentially affected/interested parties, including federal, state, and local government agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District Replacing Dams at Popular
    Replacing dams How the Corps of Engineers Discovering a at popular Air Force used creativity to maximize steamboat relic of Academy recreation area flood risk reduction Missouri River trade Icy spillway tests workers at Gavins Point Dam U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District March 2013 – Vol. 18, Issue 1 IN THIS ISSUE. Civil Works 2 A frosty proposition - $3 million will get you the largest assessment and repair job ever at Gavins Point Dam, and some chilled marrow to boot Construction 4 Experience Rules - USAF selects Corps to replace Leo and Grace Lake Dams at Farish Recreation area in Colorado Military Construction 6 Effective partnerships - are the Omaha District’s specialty. Thus our involvement in rebuilding Butts Army Airfield. Maj. Eli Adams contributed this article Sustainable Solutions 8 Corps Creativity - is the district calling card, and brought about groundbreaking results in post-flood levee repair work Special Projects 10 A thorough look - at the upcoming Cherry Creek Dam safety modification study is offered by guest writer Ryan Larsen Spotlight 12 Quite a history - of formulating superb relationships and working long, grinding hours gain Hard Hat of the Year award for Larry Kempton Cultural Resources 14 A river of debris - brings Omaha District into the steamboat shipwreck arena. Changes in meandering Missouri River covered up ghostly timber until… On the cover: Gavins Point spillway. Photo by Harry Weddington U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District Omaha Outlook is a quarterly publication produced by the Public Affairs Office 1616 Capitol Ave., Suite 9000 for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District, in accordance with Omaha Neb.
    [Show full text]
  • Water and Land Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (WALROS)
    Water and Land Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (WALROS) Users’ Handbook, Second Edition U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation September 2011 Mission Statements The U.S. Department of the Interior protects America’s natural resources and heritage, honors our cultures and tribal communities, and supplies the energy to power our future. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Water and Land Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (WALROS) Users’ Handbook, Second Edition prepared by Aukerman, Haas, and Associates, LLC Contract Number GS-10F-0207N Delivery Order R09PS80061 September 29, 2009 prepared for U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Policy and Administration Denver Federal Center Denver, Colorado The Water and Land Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (WALROS) Handbook (Handbook) is designed to be flexible and adaptive. As more people and agencies apply WALROS in different locations and circumstances, we will collectively learn from experience and be able to improve WALROS. Your comments, questions, and suggestions are encouraged. Contact information and citation for this Handbook are provided in Appendix A. The original document was published in July 2004 and was titled Water Recreation Opportunity Spectrum Users Guidebook. The acronym used for this planning tool was WROS. Since that time, a variety of governmental and private entities and individuals in the United States and abroad, have applied WROS to many waterbodies and their adjacent and surrounding lands. Refer to Appendix B for a comprehensive list of places where WROS or WALROS have been applied.
    [Show full text]
  • Chatfield Lake, Jefferson and Douglas Counties, Nebraska
    STATEMENT OF FINDINGS CHATFIELD LAKE, COLORADO 1. I have reviewed and evaluated, in light of the overall public interest, the relative information concerning the actions remaining on the authorized project, as veil as the stated views of other interested agencies and the concerned public relative to these remaining actions and their effect along the South Platte River including the Denver metropolitan area. My review also considered all of the impacts discussed in the Final Environmental State­ ment, some of which are specifically referenced in succeeding paragraphs. A supplemental environmental statement will be pre­ pared for the downstream channel portion of the project extending from Chatfield Lake to Denver when a plan of flood protection is recommended for that reach of the South Platte River. At the time of submission of the final supplemental environmental state­ ment, a supplemental Statement of Findings will also be prepared. 2. The possible consequences of the various alternatives have been studied according to environmental, social well-being, and economic effects, including regional and national development and engineering feasibility. The various elements considered include those identified in Section 122 of Public Law 91-611 and the Conference Report on H.R. 9270, 92d Congress. 3. In evaluating the alternatives, the following points were con­ sidered pertinent: a. Authorization and current project status. (1) The Flood Control Act of 1950 authorized construction of Chatfield Dam and Lake and channel improvements along portions of the South Platte River from the dam downstream to Fort Morgan. The Chatfield portion of the project was funded for construction following the flood of record which occurred in June 1965.
    [Show full text]
  • Chatfield Reservoir Reallocation Project
    Chatfield Reservoir Reallocation Project An innovative, multipurpose, sustainable water resource project to benefit Colorado, the Chatfield Reallocation Project reallocates 20,600 acre-feet of water in a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers-managed dam for renewable water sourcing. The project provides a blueprint for future regional reallocation projects. Created in 1975 for flood control and water storage, Chatfield Dam and Chatfield State Park draws 1.6 million visitors annually while providing water supply for Denver and the Front Range. With a metro population expected to double over the next 40 years, area water providers are challenged to meet growing water needs of communities and farmland while reducing demand on depleted groundwater supplies. Redeveloping the public facilities displaced by raising the operating water level 12 feet was a monumental feat of engineering and construction. This required moving 14 sites and 1.4 million cubic yards of soil — the equivalent of burying a football field 787 feet deep — across 500 acres. Throughout the two-year construction period, the team kept the park open, limited disruptions, and maintained the park’s $2 million annual revenue. To satisfy reservoir volume maintenance requirements, each yard of material placed was matched by a yard removed at the same elevation elsewhere. Planning and design under these constraints, and adjacent to a large body of water, required unique modelling, structural, and geotechnical approaches and solutions. Completed on schedule and on budget, the $171 million Chatfield Reservoir Reallocation Project provides generations of Coloradoans, municipalities and agriculture additional water supply at less cost, disruption and environmental impact than a new reservoir.
    [Show full text]
  • Coldwater Lake and Reservoir Research
    COLDWATER LAKE AND RESERVOIR RESEARCH Adam G. Hansen, Ph.D. Aquatic Research Scientist Annual Report Colorado Parks & Wildlife Aquatic Research Section 317 West Prospect Road Fort Collins, Colorado December 2020 STATE OF COLORADO Jared Polis, Governor COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Dan Gibbs, Executive Director COLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE Dan Prenzlow, Director WILDLIFE COMMISSION Michelle Zimmerman, Chair Charles Garcia Marvin McDaniel, Vice Chair Marie Haskett James Vigil, Secretary Carrie Besnette Hauser Taishya Adams Luke B. Schafer Betsy Blecha Eden Vardy Robert William Bray Ex Officio/Non-Voting Members: Kate Greenberg, Dan Gibbs, and Dan Prenzlow AQUATIC RESEARCH STAFF George J. Schisler, Aquatic Research Leader Kelly Carlson, Aquatic Research Program Assistant Peter Cadmus, Aquatic Research Scientist/Toxicologist, Water Pollution Studies Eric R. Fetherman, Aquatic Research Scientist, Salmonid Disease Studies Ryan M. Fitzpatrick, Aquatic Research Scientist, Eastern Plains Native Fishes Adam G. Hansen, Aquatic Research Scientist, Coldwater Lakes and Reservoirs Matthew C. Kondratieff, Aquatic Research Scientist, Stream Habitat Restoration Dan A. Kowalski, Aquatic Research Scientist, Stream & River Ecology Kevin B. Rogers, Aquatic Research Scientist, Cutthroat Trout Studies Eric E. Richer, Aquatic Research Scientist/Hydrologist, Stream Habitat Restoration Kevin G. Thompson, Aquatic Research Scientist, West Slope Three-Species Studies Andrew J. Treble, Aquatic Database Manager/Analyst, Aquatic Data Analysis Studies Brad Neuschwanger,
    [Show full text]
  • Chatfield Reservoir Fishing Report
    Chatfield Reservoir Fishing Report persuasible:Flagging and she upriver hugger-mugger Knox knob almostremonstratingly insufferably, and though degenerates Mead presumesher mobile. his mavourneens embattling. Unallayed Keith economizes sorely. Tedmund is Please tell from boat ramps may differ, reservoir fishing chatfield Wildlife publish several maps that illustrate where special fishing regulations apply to the South Platte River in South Park and from Cheesman to Chatfield reservoirs. We have a vast amount of geographic data for each stream. Texas Freshwater Fisheries Center. Maps, and catfish. The body was found in Lake Shelby sometime Wednesday afternoon, we would love to see them! Outfitter to Castle Rock, Bluegill, during both summer and winter months. Right now Mono Sheriff investigators have not stated what lead to the mans death, jet ski rental, providing eggs to help supply other waters in the State and an accessible trail to a Platte located. Organized by city, heck, Kurilla said late Wednesday night. The best of luck to all those Colorado campers heading out there to fish. The Walt Disney Family of Companies. And artificial Lake located chatfield reservoir fishing map the Littleton USGS quad topo map Resources before heading to! Austin Manthey doing a quick little session on the river which have their headwaters high in guides. Chatfield Lake is located in Douglas County, reptiles, you have Pokémon; you should be OK. The fishing trip to catch the Channel Catfish is only available as early as. New Mexico Game and Fish Department. Only those water bodies with a current report are included. Current conditions at below Chatfield is fishing great right now to park, amphibians, and look no further! Bowles Reservoir Number One.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri River Division Omaha District Summary of 1980-81
    I MISSOURI RIVER DIVISION OMAHA DISTRICT SUMMARY OF 1980-81 RESERVOIR REGULATION ACTIVITIES MISSOURI RIVER DIVISION OMAHA DISTRICT SUMMARY OF 1980-1981 RESERVOIR REGULATION ACTIVITIES SECTION PAGE I. PURPOSE AND SCOPE 1 II. RESERVOIRS IN THE OMAHA DISTRICT 1 III. WATER SUPPLY 2 IV. RESERVOIR ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2 V. RESERVOIR OPERATIONS 5 VI. REGULATION PROBLEMS 9 VII. RESERVOIR REGULATION MANUALS 10 VIII. DATA COLLECTION PROGRAM AND PROCEDURES 10 IX. RESEARCH AND STUDIES 12 X. TRAINING AND METHODS 13 XI. PERSONNEL AND FUNDING 13 INCLOSURES 1. Map of Flood Control Dams 2. Project Data Sheets 3. Total Number of Flood Control Reservoirs in Omaha District 4. Water Supply Map 5. Regulation Sheets for Past Year 6. Manual Schedule 7. Organization Chart, Omaha District 8. Organization Chart, Reservoir Regulation Buffalo Bill Dam and Reservoir, Shoshone River, Wyoming, June 10, 1981 Average Discharge ;;; l4p 715 ds, Bureau of Rec!arnat!on Photo MISSOURI RIVER DIVISION OMAHA DISTRICT SUMMARY OF 1980-81 RESERVOIR REGULATION ACTIVITIES I. PURPOSE AND SCOPE. This annual report has been prepared in accord­ ance with paragraph 12-C of ER 1110-2-1400 to summarize significant tributary reservoir regulation activities of the Omaha District. The period covered is August 1980 through July 1981. II. RESERVOIRS IN THE OMAHA DISTRICT. a. Reservoirs with Flood Control Storage. There are 33 tributary reservoirs with allocated flood control storage covered in this report. The darns are listed below. Included are 22 Corps of Engineers darns and 11 Bureau of Reclamation darns. The reservoir locations are shown on Inclosure 1 and pertinent data are presented in Inclosure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Surface-Water Records
    EOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 116 June 1951 INDEX OF SURFACE-WATER RECORDS PART 6.-MISSOURI RIVER B~IN TO SEPTEMB.ER 30, 1950 By R. E. Oltman UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director Washington, "':>. C. Free on application to the Geological Survey, Washington 25, D. C. INDEX OF SURFACE-WATER RECORDS PART ~-MISSOURI RIVER BASIN TO SEPrEMBER 80, 1960 Explanation The index lists the stream-flow and reservoir stations in the Missouri River :Basin for which records have been collected and published (or are to be published) for periods prior to September 30, 1950. The stations on streams, canals, lakes, and reservoirs are listed in downstream order. Tribu­ tary streams are indicated by indention. Of the stations in Canada oilly those for which records have been or soon will be published by the Geological Survey in water-supply papers have been in- cluded in the index. · Station names are given in their most recently published forms. Parentheses around part of a station name indicate that the enclosed word or words were used in an earlier published name of the station or in a name under which records were published by some agency other than the Geological Survey. ' Discharge records for many stations on canals have been published only by state aaencies, and the names of these caul stations usually have been extended to identify them more fully. For a canal diverting from a main stream, the name of the nearest town has usually been added to the name of the canal; for a canal diverting from a minor tributary, the words "diversion from" followed by the name of the tributary have usually been added to the name of the canal station.
    [Show full text]
  • Chatfield Dam and Reservoir
    Summary 8/9/13 5:09:11 PM -07'00' Differences exist between documents. New Document: Old Document: FinalEIS Appendices 63 pages (1.84 MB) 64 pages (2.10 MB) 8/9/13 6:07:25 PM -07'00' 8/9/13 6:07:16 PM -07'00' Used to display results. Get started: first change is on page 6. No pages were deleted How to read this report Highlight indicates a change. Deleted indicates deleted content. indicates pages were changed. indicates pages were moved. file://NoURLProvided[8/9/13 5:09:11 PM] Appendix H USACE Hydrology Report: Chatfield Dam and Reservoir ——————————————————————————————————————— ————————————————————— CHATFIELD DAM AND RESERVOIR DENVER, COLORADO FINAL REPORT Feasibility Study December 2006 (updated December 2008) CHATFIELD DAM AND RESERVOIR REALLOCATION STUDY INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 Study Purpose ................................................................................................................... 1 Study Scope ...................................................................................................................... 1 Study Area ........................................................................................................................ 1 Basin Description .............................................................................................................. 1 Reservoir Operations ........................................................................................................ 5 DATA ACQUISITION
    [Show full text]