DOCSLIB.ORG

The Markan "Divorce" Pericope: an Exegesis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Markan Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertations Graduate Research 2012 The Markan "Divorce" Pericope: an Exegesis Carlos C. Camarena Andrews University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations Part of the Biblical Studies Commons Recommended Citation Camarena, Carlos C., "The Markan "Divorce" Pericope: an Exegesis" (2012). Dissertations. 1666. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/1666 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT THE MARKAN “DIVORCE” PERICOPE: AN EXEGESIS by Carlos C. Camarena Adviser: Robert M. Johnston ABSTRACT OF GRADUATE STUDENT RESEARCH Dissertation Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary Title: THE MARKAN "DIVORCE" PERICOPE: AN EXEGESIS Name of researcher: Carlos C. Camarena Name and degree of faculty adviser: Robert M. Johnston, Ph.D. Date completed: April 2012 Problem Jesus pronounced one major saying on the question of "divorce" in the NT for which there are four independent reports: three in the Gospels (Matt 19: 1-9, Mark 10: 1- 12, and Luke 16:18) and one in Paul (1 Cor 7:10-16). The major accounts (Markan and Matthean)' though appearing to be similar, there are significant grammatical and syntactical differences and two vastly different ethnic foci (a Matthean-Jewish focus versus a Markan-Gentile one) so as to each merit independent analysis. Traditionally, however, the Church has mostly relied on the Matthean account to derive its theology on divorce and remarriage, even when Mark's account is widely considered to precede the lTbe Lukan account, though considered by many to be the most primitive, does not provide us with much context for it to warrant exegetical consideration. Matthean account. The tendency to conflate all divorce sayings in the Bible, and specifically in the NT, into one essential meaning creates insurmountable problems when such sayings are studied independently. Because no major study has specifically focused on the "divorce" logion as it appears in Mark, major questions related to Jesus' teaching on the subject still remain unanswered. Purpose The purpose of this dissertation is an attempt to make a contextual assessment of Jesus' teaching on "divorce" according to Mark in order to define its basic thrust within a Gentile community (in relation to Matthew's Jewish community) and to ellucidate a clearer picture of what the NT Jesus may have taught on the subject. Method This study is divided into six major chapters and an appendix. Chapter 1 gives a bird's-eye view into some of the modem scholarship regarding the "divorce" sayings in both Gospels. Chapter 2 focuses its attention on the locale of the Gentile audience of Mark, analyzing whether the purported Gentile-Roman audience could actually fit a Palestinian milieu. Chapter 3 considers the divorce practices among the Romans and analyzes whether those practices may have reached Palestinians via Roman influence. Chapter 4 considers a grammatical-syntactical structure and connectors that may identify the Markan peri cope (Mark 10: 1-12) as a unit, In this chapter I also analyze the crux word translated "to divorce" in the Gospels and show that Greek writers two centuries prior to the NT as well as a century after do not consistently use the term apo/l£i5to mean to divorce, and neither do modem translators. In chapter 5 I conduct an exegesis in which I analyze Jesus' statement based on the Mosaic legislation (Deut 24: 1-4) and the :raditional Jewish internretation of such legislation. I discuss unresolved issues in chapter -; and nresent the plausible interpretation of the Markan "divorce" saying. The appendix contains a historical analysis on the use of the crux word translated "to divorce": apo!t~i5 and its derivatives. Conclusions The unity of the Markan peri cope (Mark 10: 1-12), the historical context in which Mark places Jesus' "divorce" saying, the traditional Jewish interpretation of Deut 24: 1-4, and the generally known term used for divorce during NT times, all point to the probability that Jesus may have not been referring to the practice of divorce, but rather condemning the practice of desertion, specifically pointing to the house of Herod 'where Herodias left her husband and whose letter of divorce did not give her the right to divorce him, according to Jewish views, and an indirect attack to Herod's own expulsion of his Nabatean wife. If this study is to be of any value, it should point us to the importance of doing independent analysis of all texts/peri copes in which this subject may be found before making generalized statements or taking theological sides. Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary THE MARKAN “DIVORCE” PERICOPE: AN EXEGESIS A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by Carlos C. Camarena April 2012 © Copyright by Carlos C. Camarena 2012 All Rights Reserved THE MARKAN “DIVORCE” PERICOPE: AN EXEGESIS A dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy by Carlos C. Camarena APPROVAL BY THE COMMITTEE: __________________________________ ____________________________ Faculty Adviser, Director of Ph.D./Th.D. Program Robert M. Johnston Thomas Shepherd Professor of New Testament __________________________________ ____________________________ Richard M. Davidson Dean, SDA Theological Seminary Professor of Old Testament Denis Fortin __________________________________ W. Larry Richards Professor of New Testament __________________________________ _________________________ Date approved TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................... vi LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................... vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ......................................................................................... x Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 1 A Brief Modern History ........................................................................ 4 Did He Say It? ................................................................................. 7 Jesus and the Rabbis ....................................................................... 10 No Divorce—No Remarriage ......................................................... 14 For the Kingdom’s Sake ................................................................. 17 The Jesus Seminar........................................................................... 19 The Question of Grammar .............................................................. 20 Background to the Problem .................................................................. 21 Statement of the Problem ...................................................................... 29 Statement of Purpose ............................................................................ 29 Justification for the Study .................................................................... 30 Assumptions.......................................................................................... 31 Scope and Delimitations ....................................................................... 32 Methodology ......................................................................................... 33 2. THE GALILEAN-GENTILE AUDIENCE OF MARK ............................. 36 Introduction ........................................................................................... 36 The Gentile-Roman Audience of Mark ................................................ 37 Mark’s Other Non-Palestinian and Non-Roman Audience .................. 39 Mark’s Palestinian Audience ................................................................ 41 Hellenistic Influences in Galilee ........................................................... 42 Mark’s Use of Foreign Terms ............................................................... 53 Summary and Conclusions ................................................................... 57 3. MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE UNDER THE ROMANS: FIRST CENTURY BCE TO FIRST CE ..................................................... 61 Introduction ........................................................................................... 61 Marriage and Divorce Laws in Pre-Imperial Times ............................. 65 iii Marriage by Usus ............................................................................ 67 Marriage by Coemptio .................................................................... 72 Marriage by Confaerratio ............................................................... 74 Women’s Movement of the Late Republic ........................................... 77 Marriage and Divorce during Imperial Times ...................................... 81 Free Marriage and Concubinage ..................................................... 82 Fictitious Marriages ........................................................................ 86 The Age of Marriage ....................................................................... 87 The Decaying Status of Marriage Relationships ...........................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The PRINCETON SEMINARY Bulletin
    CATALOGUE ISSUE 1962-1963 The PRINCETON SEMINARY Bulletin VolumeLV Number4 June 1962 Published Quarterly by the Trustees of the Theological Seminary of the Presbyterian Church. Second class postage paid at Princeton, N. J. The annual Catalogue is an account of the academic year 1961-62 and an announcement of the proposed program for the year 1962-63. The projected program is subject to change and is in no way binding upon the Seminary. CATALOGUE ISSUE 1962-1963 ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY-FIRST YEAR Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2017 with funding from Princeton Theological Seminary Library t https://archive.org/details/princetonseminar5541prin CONTENTS ^ C^5 ^1 ’^1 i '^i r^3 '^) ’^r. r^5 '^11. Communication with Seminary . 5 Academic Calendar .. 6 Trustees. 8 Administration and Faculty. 10 Sesquicentennial Program ... 16 Princeton Institute of Theology. 18 General Information . 21 Admission . 29 Requirements for Graduation. 37 Relations with Princeton University. 47 Courses of Study. 49 Additional Departments and Services. 99 Finances and Scholarships . 105 Events and Activities. 118 Publications . 121 Students in the Seminary. 122 Representations. 155 Degrees Conferred in 1961 . 159 Campus Map . 162 Gifts and Bequests. 163 Index . .. 164 3 Alexander Hall COMMUNICATION WITH THE SEMINARY • Mailing Address Princeton Theological Seminary Princeton, New Jersey Telephone Number Area Code 609 WAlnut 1-8300 Communication with the seminary will be facilitated if initial correspondence is addressed to the officers named below: General Matters
    [Show full text]
  • Online Bible Study July 28 Marriage and Divorce Matthew 19:1-12 When
    Online Bible Study July 28 Marriage and Divorce Matthew 19:1-12 When Jesus had finished saying these things, he left Galilee and went into the region of Judea to the other side of the Jordan. 2 Large crowds followed him, and he healed them there. 3 Some Pharisees came to him to test him. They asked, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason?” 4 “Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’ 5 and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’? 6 So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.” 7 “Why then,” they asked, “did Moses command that a man give his wife a certificate of divorce and send her away?” 8 Jesus replied, “Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning. 9 I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.” 10 The disciples said to him, “If this is the situation between a husband and wife, it is better not to marry.” 11 Jesus replied, “Not everyone can accept this word, but only those to whom it has been given. 12 For there are eunuchs who were born that way, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others—and there are those who choose to live like eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuomas Havukainen: the Quest for the Memory of Jesus
    Tuomas Havukainen The Quest for the Memory of Jesus: A Havukainen Tuomas Viable Path or a Dead End? Tuomas Havukainen | This study is focused on the active international or a Dead End? Path Viable the Memory Quest for The of Jesus: A field of study in which various theories of mem- ory (e.g. social/collective memory and individual The Quest for the Memory of Jesus: memory) and ancient media studies (e.g. study A Viable Path or a Dead End? of oral tradition and history) are applied to historical Jesus research. The main purpose of the dissertation is to study whether the memory approach constitutes a coherent methodological school of thought. The dissertation discusses in what ways the memory approach distinguishes itself from earlier research and whether one can speak of a new beginning in historical Jesus research. A central focus of the study is the research-historical discussion on the nature and processes of the transmission of the Jesus tradi- tions in early Christianity, which is a significant research problem for both earlier historical Jesus research and the memory approach. | 2017 9 789517 658812 Åbo Akademi University Press | ISBN 978-951-765-881-2 Tuomas Havukainen (born 1988) Master of Theology (MTh) 2012, University of Wales Cover Photo: by Patrik Šlechta, September 11, 2014, from Pixabay.com. Photo licensed under CC0 1.0 https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ https://pixabay.com/en/israel-path-dune-desert-499050/ Åbo Akademi University Press Tavastgatan 13, FI-20500 Åbo, Finland Tel. +358 (0)2 215 3478 E-mail: [email protected] Sales and distribution: Åbo Akademi University Library Domkyrkogatan 2–4, FI-20500 Åbo, Finland Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • FILMS on Palestine-Israel By
    PALESTINE-ISRAEL FILMS ON THE HISTORY of the PALESTINE-ISRAEL CONFLICT compiled with brief introduction and commentary by Rosalyn Baxandall A publication of the Palestine-Israel Working Group of Historians Against the War (HAW) December 2014 www.historiansagainstwar.org Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – ShareAlike 1 Introduction This compilation of films that relate to the Palestinian-Israeli struggle was made in July 2014. The films are many and the project is ongoing. Why film? Film is often an extraordinarily effective tool. I found that many students in my classes seemed more visually literate than print literate. Whenever I showed a film, they would remember the minute details, characters names and sub-plots. Films were accessible and immediate. Almost the whole class would participate and debates about the film’s meaning were lively. Film showings also improved attendance at teach-ins. At the Truro, Massachusetts, Library in July 2014, the film Voices Across the Divide was shown to the biggest audiences the library has ever had, even though the Wellfleet Library and several churches had refused to allow the film to be shown. Organizing is also important. When a film is controversial, as many in this pamphlet are, a thorough organizing effort including media coverage will augment the turnout for the film. Many Jewish and Palestinian groups list films in their resources. This pamphlet lists them alphabetically, and then by number under themes and categories; the main listings include summaries, to make the films more accessible and easier to use by activist and academic groups. 2 1. 5 Broken Cameras, 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Jesus and Divorce and Remarriage in Matthew 19
    Jesus and Divorce and Remarriage in Matthew 19 By Ekkehardt Mueller Biblical Research Institute Recently, while traveling to Europe, my wife found an interesting article in a magazine, describing the behavior of modern women. Fortunately, a lady wrote the article. She illustrated her point by describing the breaking apart of a marriage. A former gold medalist and world recorder holder, who is still active in pursuing her career in sports, left her husband, a twofold world finalist and now a homemaker, including her two sons, in favor of a lover, who is also a well-known sportsman. The writer the article states that behavior that was considered male, namely leaving spouse and children to live with a new partner, has become common with women. Eva Kohlrusch remarks sarcastically: “Women can congratulate each other. Equality progresses. Women do more and more often what in the past was considered a typical male behavior. They get out of their marriage and their children with their father. She behaves as he has done in the past. We need to invent a totally new concept to protect children from feelings of abandonment.”1 Divorce and remarriage has become a challenge for societies and churches. Ideas of the postmodern age are also influencing Christians. Some abandon the concept of absolute truth. Pluralism is partially accepted. The human has become the ultimate goal. Abundant life is defined as feeling well and being well only. Pain and suffering have become unacceptable. Although there are very difficult circumstances in some marriages, we must recognize that sometimes people may get out of their marriages too easily.
    [Show full text]
  • (Anna Condo) in Wedding in Galilee, a Figure of Transition Between the Allure of Traditional Femininity and the Enactment of Phallic Authority
    The bride (Anna Condo) in Wedding in Galilee, a figure of transition between the allure of traditional femininity and the enactment of phallic authority. Courtesy of Kino Film Downloaded from http://read.dukeupress.edu/camera-obscura/article-pdf/23/3 (69)/1/400972/CO69_01_Ball.pdf by guest on 30 September 2021 Between a Postcolonial Nation and Fantasies of the Feminine: The Contested Visions of Palestinian Cinema Anna Ball In the relatively youthful field of Palestinian filmmaking, Wedding in Galilee (Urs al-jalil, dir. Michel Khleifi, Palestine/France/Bel- gium, 1987) and Divine Intervention (Yadun ilaheyya, dir. Elia Sulei- man, France/Morocco/Germany/Palestine, 2002) represent sig- nificant contributions to their national cinema at crucial points in its development and in the nation’s history. Khleifi’s work opposed the militant propagandist tone of films produced by the Pales- tine Liberation Organization (PLO) following the Six-Day War of 1967, which saw significant territorial gains by Israel and became known as al-Naksa, the setback or disaster, to Palestinians.1 Wed- ding in Galilee’s unusually lyrical, meditative style drew attention for the way it seemed to capture a profound sense of uncertainty in Palestinian nationhood. Its thoughtful ambivalence, or what might now be read in terms of its status as “accented cinema,”2 made it the first Palestinian feature film to achieve international recognition, gaining the International Critics’ prize at Cannes in Camera Obscura 69, Volume 23, Number 3 doi 10.1215/02705346-2008-006 © 2008 by Camera Obscura Published by Duke University Press 1 Downloaded from http://read.dukeupress.edu/camera-obscura/article-pdf/23/3 (69)/1/400972/CO69_01_Ball.pdf by guest on 30 September 2021 2 • Camera Obscura 1987.
    [Show full text]
  • Matthew 19-20: Commitment to the Kingdom
    Life & Teachings of Jesus Lecture 22, page 1 Matthew 19-20: Commitment to the Kingdom In Matthew 19 there is a theme of service to the kingdom of God, which is shown by love towards one’s spouse and toward children, and respect for everyone in the Christian community. These points were made by two antithetical questions. First the Pharisees asked, “How little can I give, what is the minimal service that I can render to my spouse?” And Jesus gave the answer, “You should not be asking that question; you should ask rather what God’s plan for marriage is.” Shortly after that a rich young ruler came and asked, “If I give the maximum to God, can I be sure that God will notice and will in some way reward me or give me my due for this form of service?” Jesus showed that was a faulty question too because he had not really given the maximum to God. Then Peter said, “While he would not give up everything, we have. What then will there be for us? What reward will we have?” Jesus answered Peter and the other disciples, saying, “I tell you the truth, at the renewal of all things, when the Son of Man sits on his glorious throne, you who have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. And everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or children or fields for my sake will receive a hundred times as much and will inherit eternal life.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Ordination in the Baptist Context
    CHANGED, SET APART, AND EQUAL: A STUDY OF ORDINATION IN THE BAPTIST CONTEXT Dissertation Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology By Jonathan Anthony Malone Dayton, Ohio May, 2011 CHANGED, SET APART, AND EQUAL: A STUDY OF ORDINATION IN THE BAPTIST CONTEXT APPROVED BY: _____________________________ Dennis M. Doyle, Ph.D. Committee Chair _____________________________ Brad J. Kallenberg, Ph.D. Committee Member _____________________________ William L. Portier, Ph.D. Committee Member _____________________________ Anthony B. Smith, Ph.D. Committee Member _____________________________ William V. Trollinger, Ph.D. Committee Member ii ABSTRACT CHANGED, SET APART, AND EQUAL: A STUDY OF ORDINATION IN THE BAPTIST CONTEXT Name: Malone, Jonathan Anthony University of Dayton Advisor: Dr. Dennis Doyle The American Baptist denomination is often characterized as an ecclesiological grass-roots organization. The theology of such a denomination is practiced organically by the people and is seldom articulated by the academy. Thus one cannot find a well articulated theological understanding of what ordination means for the individual and the community in the Baptist context. A synthesis of Geertz’s thick description, Lindbeck’s approach to doctrine, and McClendon’s understandings of speech-acts and conviction will offer a methodology through which one can articulate a theology of ordination. In doing so, we will find that the “call” and a relationship with a congregation are essential for ordination to occur. Such a theology will suggest that one is changed through ordination, and this change is relational in nature. The Catholic concept of Sacramental Consciousness offers a way to articulate the community’s awareness of the pastor’s relational change while at the same time maintaining the egalitarian nature of a Baptist community.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (PDF)
    Princeton Theological Review Vol. 18, No. 1 | Spring 2015 Church for the World: Essays in Honor of the Retirement of Darrell L. Guder Prolegomena 3 CATHERINE C. TOBEY Darrell L. Guder 5 BENJAMIN T. CONNER “Sent into All the World” 9 Luke’s sending of the seventy(-two): intertextuality, reception history, and missional hermeneutics NATHAN C. JOHNSON The Church as Organism 21 Herman Bavinck’s ecclesiology for a postmodern context MICHAEL DAVID KEY Eucharist as Communion 33 The Eucharist and the Absolute in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit LUKE ZERRA Lesslie Newbigin’s Indian Interlocutors 45 A Study in Theological Reception DEANNA FERREE WOMACK Book Reviews 63 About the PTR 71 Prolegomena CATHERINE C. TOBEY Executive Editor, Princeton Theological Review Who am I to be a witness? Who are you? How can we even dream of being heard when addressing this wide world overcome by complexities, needs, doubts, and suffering? For Karl Barth, the answer is simple. He writes, “The point is, in general terms, that only on the lips of a man who is himself affected, seized and committed, controlled and nourished, unsettled and settled, comforted and alarmed by it, can the intrinsically true witness of the act and revelation of God in Jesus Christ have the ring and authority of truth which applies to other [humans]” (Church Dogmatics IV/3.2, 657). Darrell Guder is such a person, one whose witness is made indelibly clear as Christ’s compassion and conviction simultaneously shine through him. As he retires from his post as the Henry Winters Luce Professor of Missional and Ecumenical Theology at Princeton Theological Seminary, it is the great privilege of the editors at the Princeton Theological Review to present this issue in his honor.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Palestinian Filmmaking in a Global World Sarah Frances Hudson University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 5-2017 Modern Palestinian Filmmaking in a Global World Sarah Frances Hudson University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Near and Middle Eastern Studies Commons, and the Visual Studies Commons Recommended Citation Hudson, Sarah Frances, "Modern Palestinian Filmmaking in a Global World" (2017). Theses and Dissertations. 1872. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/1872 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Modern Palestinian Filmmaking in a Global World A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Comparative Literature and Cultural Studies by Sarah Hudson Hendrix College Bachelor of Arts in English Literature, 2007 University of Arkansas Master of Arts in Comparative Literature and Cultural Studies, 2011 May 2017 University of Arkansas This thesis/dissertation is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council: ____________________________________________ Dr. Mohja Kahf Dissertation Director ____________________________________________ Dr. Ted Swedenburg Committee Member ____________________________________________ Dr. Keith Booker Committee Member Abstract This dissertation employs a comprehensive approach to analyze the cinematic accent of feature length, fictional Palestinian cinema and offers concrete criteria to define the genre of Palestinian fictional film that go beyond traditional, nation-centered approaches to defining films. Employing Arjun Appardurai’s concepts of financescapes, technoscapes, mediascapes, ethnoscapes, and ideoscapes, I analyze the filmic accent of six Palestinian filmmakers: Michel Khleifi, Rashid Masharawi, Ali Nassar, Elia Suleiman, Hany Abu Assad, and Annemarie Jacir.
    [Show full text]
  • Cinéma Du Nord
    A North Wind THE NEW REALISM OF THE FRENCH- WALLOON CINÉMA DU NORD A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY NIELS NIESSEN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ADVISER: CESARE CASARINO NOVEMBER, 2013 © Niels Niessen, 2013 i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Ideas sometimes come in the middle of the night yet they are never fully one’s own. They are for a very large part the fruits of the places and organizations one works or is supported by, the communities one lives in and traverses, and the people one loves and is loved by. First of all, I would like to acknowledge the support I received from the following institutions: the American Council of Learned Societies, the Huygens Scholarship Program of the Dutch government, the Prins Bernard Cultuurfonds (The Netherlands), and, at the University of Minnesota, the Center for German & European Studies (and its donor Hella Mears), the Graduate School (and the Harold Leonard Memorial Fellowship in Film Study), as well as the Department of Cultural Studies and Comparative Literature. As for my home department, I could not have wished for a warmer and more intellectually vibrant community to pursue my graduate studies, and I express my gratitude to all who I have worked with. A special word of thanks to my academic adviser, Cesare Casarino, who has taught me how to read many of the philosophies that, explicitly or implicitly, have shaped my thinking in the following pages, and who has made me see that cinema too is a form of thought.
    [Show full text]
  • S Ociety R Eport
    Society Report SocietyNovember 2011 of Biblical Literature Inside Tributes and Reflections 1 The Society of Mutual Support 1 KJV 400th Anniversary 4 The Lesson of the King James Version 5 Adele Reinhartz 6 The Society of Mutual Support James C. VanderKam 7 Digital SBL 8 In February 2011, one of our members, Alan Segal, passed away. Kind words, reflections, and Bible Odyssey Website 8 personal stories poured in. One I remember most said this: Digital Scholarship 8 - Year in Review 10 Alan was what was right about the SBL and the AAR. He moved seamlessly between the two—at home in an AAR session on Jewish mysticism and in the SBL on Christol Publications 10 ogy or Paul. But more than that, Alan was what was right about our profession. He 2011 SBL Book List 10 was curious to a fault, always self-effacing, and mentored everyone who let him. He- Editorial Boards 12 single-handedly forged bonds among a myriad of scholars. The joy and colleagueship that exists at our meetings are due to Alan and others like him, who see that scholar Congresses 14 ship is truly a social act. Alan understood his own education as a gift and gave freely to Regional Meetings 18 all. He embodied what is right about our common professions. Annual Meeting Program Unit Chairs 19 Each of us is a member of many different organizations: departments, unions, congregations, community associations, or sports clubs to name a few. We join and participate because such International Meeting groups support our personal interests, because we can exercise those interests better together, Program Unit Chairs 23 and because we are at our best when we unite to shape the future.
    [Show full text]