DOCSLIB.ORG

Covered Bridge Security Manual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Covered Bridge Security Manual Forest Products Laboratory General United States Department of Agriculture Technical Forest Service Report FPL–GTR–223 In cooperation Covered Bridge with the United States Department of Security Manual Transportation Brent Phares Federal Highway Terry Wipf Administration Ryan Sievers Travis Hosteng Abstract Contents The design, construction, and use of covered timber bridges Introduction .........................................................................1 is all but a lost art in these days of pre-stressed concrete, high-performance steel, and the significant growth both in Overview—Covered Bridge Surveillance Project, the volume and size of vehicles. Furthermore, many of the Iowa State University ..........................................................1 existing covered timber bridges are preserved only because Literature Review ................................................................2 of their status on the National Registry of Historic Places or the diligent maintenance and care of the owners of these Covered Bridge Monitoring System: Design ......................5 structures, or both. Of the covered timber bridges that Set-Up ...............................................................................17 remain in the United States, only a small percentage still stand today because of arson, vandalism, neglect, natural Testing ...............................................................................19 disasters, and other factors. The objective of this work is Summary ...........................................................................20 to provide covered timber bridge owners with the tools to quickly and efficiently design and implement a security Recommendations .............................................................20 system to protect these important historical landmarks. This Madison County Project ...................................................21 goal was obtained with an in-depth analysis of equipment based on the practicality in a covered bridge application. Challenges with Each Bridge ............................................24 Other major considerations required for all equipment to Testing ...............................................................................29 work efficiently within a security system are also fully discussed, including, but not limited to, maintenance, power Example Case Studies .......................................................29 requirements, and general set-up of an integrated security Real Case Studies ..............................................................31 system. A comprehensive case study is presented involv- ing monitoring systems placed on five of the six covered References .........................................................................33 bridges in Madison County, Iowa, at the end of this report to showcase the abilities of an integrated system and all the This study is part of the Research, Technology and Educa- decisions that must be made throughout the process for the tion portion of the National Historic Covered Bridge entire system to work as intended. Preservation (NHCBP) Program administered by the Keywords: Covered bridges, wood bridges, security Federal Highway Administration. The NHCBP program includes preservation, rehabilitation and restoration of covered bridges that are listed or are eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places; research for better means of restoring, and protecting these bridges; development of educational aids; and technology transfer May 2013 to disseminate information on covered bridges in order to Phares, Brent; Wipf, Terry; Sievers, Ryan; Hosteng, Travis. 2013. Covered preserve the Nation’s cultural heritage. bridge security manual. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-223. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Labo- ratory. 34 p. A limited number of free copies of this publication are available to the This study is conducted under a joint agreement between public from the Forest Products Laboratory, One Gifford Pinchot Drive, the Federal Highway Administration–Turner Madison, WI 53726–2398. This publication is also available online at www.fpl.fs.fed.us. Laboratory publications are sent to hundreds of libraries Fairbank Highway Research Center, in the United States and elsewhere. and the Forest Service – Forest Products Laboratory. The Forest Products Laboratory is maintained in cooperation with the University of Wisconsin. Federal Highway Administration Program Manager– The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information Sheila Rimal Duwadi, P.E. and does not imply endorsement by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) of any product or service. Forest Products Laboratory Program Manager– Michael A. Ritter, P.E. The USDA prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orienta- tion, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program informa- tion (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimi- nation, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250–9410, or call (800) 795–3272 (voice) or (202) 720–6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Covered Bridge Security Manual Principal Investigator Brent Phares Co-Director, National Center for Wood Transportation Structures Institute for Transportation, Iowa State University Co-Principal Investigator Terry Wipf Co-Director, National Center for Wood Transportation Structures Institute for Transportation, Iowa State University Research Assistant Ryan Sievers Travis Hosteng Bridge Research Specialist, Bridge Engineering Center Institute for Transportation, Iowa State University Introduction purpose of heightening security. Because very little techni- cal literature exists dealing exclusively with the subject of Covered bridges used to cover the American landscape from security and monitoring systems for covered bridges, we coast to coast. However, because of various factors includ- contacted multiple Departments of Transportation (DOTs) ing neglect, arson, vandalism, and natural disasters, current- with a high concentration of covered bridges as well as ly less than 700 to 900 bridges are still in existence today. multiple bridge owners to assess the state of covered bridge Covered bridges tend to be in isolated areas, and they are security in the United States. This insight from bridge own- constructed with a flammable material, which makes them ers coupled with technical literature about physical security highly susceptible to arson and vandalism. Because they are of other assets is the basis of this report. usually far from populated areas, it is difficult for firefight- ers to arrive at the bridges in a timely manner once a fire has Overview—Covered Bridge been set. This makes it likely that any fire may cause critical Surveillance Project, Iowa State damage or may completely destroy a bridge. Most of these covered bridges are covered by volunteer fire departments, University which only adds another level of complexity to the situation. In 2005, the Bridge Engineering Center (BEC) at Iowa State It is essential that we protect and preserve these standing University (ISU) completed a case study on remote security landmarks throughout our country for future generations. of historic covered bridges by designing and implementing One way to provide the necessary security is to use remote an active monitoring system on the Cedar Covered Bridge in monitoring and other security systems to protect them from Madison County, Iowa (Phares 2006). The security system trespassers. installed on the Cedar Bridge is discussed further in the case Multiple bridge owners throughout the United States have studies portion of this report. The work completed and the taken measures to ensure the safety and integrity of their system developed for the Cedar Bridge resulted in the BEC covered bridges by implementing structural strengthening, receiving a grant from the Federal Highway Administration fireproofing, and monitoring systems. Common protective (FHWA), through the National Historic Covered Bridge methods entail illuminating the bridge site and using fire- Preservation Program (Matias 2011), to install remotely retardant material around important structural members. monitored security systems on the other five covered bridges These methods are typically used because they are usually in Madison County. The five bridges included in the security very cost effective. Unfortunately, these systems are passive monitoring grant, the Cutler–Donahoe, Holliwell, Hogback, approaches and provide no mechanisms to alert the proper Imes, and Roseman covered bridges, are five of the six land- authorities and increase the chances of survival for the mark bridges that remain in Madison County and the only bridges. bridges that have not been completely rebuilt. The Hogback Bridge was partially damaged by arson but managed to sur- This report is intended to assist covered bridge owners in vive and was restored
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Field Testing and Structural Analysis of Burr Arch Covered Bridges in Pennsylvania
    Field Testing and Structural Analysis of Burr Arch Covered Bridges in Pennsylvania Douglas Rammer1, James Wacker2, Travis Hosteng3, Justin Dahlberg4 and Yaohua Deng5 ABSTRACT: The Federal Highway Administration sponsored a comprehensive research program on Historic Covered Timber Bridges in the USA. This national program's main purpose is to develop improved methods to preserve, rehabilitate, and restore timber bridge trusses that were developed during the early 1800s and, in many cases, are still in service today. One of the many ongoing research studies is aimed at establishing a procedure for safely and reliably load- rating historic covered bridges though physical testing and improved structural modelling. This paper focuses on recent field work and analysis of four Burr Arch through-truss-type covered bridges located in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. An overview of field evaluation methods, loading testing, and structural modelling procedures are included along with a comparison of field measurements and structural model prediction of bridge behaviour. KEYWORDS: loading rating, structural analysis, covered bridges, historical landmark, burr arch 1 INTRODUCTION 123 established for historic covered bridges. Given the historic nature and unusual geometric features of these The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), in structures, a procedure needs to be established detailing partnership with the USDA Forest Products Laboratory how to safely and reliably determine load ratings for and the National Park Service (NPS), sponsored a historic covered timber bridges through physical testing. comprehensive national research program on Historic Covered Timber Bridges in the USA. The main purpose Similarly, the complex behavior and unique details of is to develop improved methods to preserve, rehabilitate, covered bridges make structural modeling a daunting task and restore timber bridge trusses that were first developed for the typical bridge engineer.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Bridges of Somerset County Pennsylvania
    HISTORIC BRIDGES OF SOMERSET COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA Scott D. Heberling Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration HISTORIC BRIDGES OF SOMERSET COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA Scott D. Heberling Photographs by Scott D. Heberling and Stephen Simpson except as noted Layout and design by Christopher Yohn This publication was produced by Heberling Associates, Inc. for the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration © 2010 Pennsylvania Department of Transportation ISBN-10: 0-89271-126-4 ISBN-13: 978-0-89271-126-0 CONTENTS 1 Somerset County’s Historic Bridges 3 Bridge Building in Pennsylvania 6 Stone Arch Bridges 10 Wooden Covered Bridges 21 Metal Truss Bridges 35 Concrete Bridges 43 Bridge Location Map 44 Sources Glessner Bridge Salisbury Viaduct Somerset County’s Historic Bridges Somerset County, high in the Laurel Highlands of southwestern Pennsylvania, is renowned for its stunning natural beauty and expansive rural landscapes. It is also rich in history. The county’s many historic farms, villages, and winding country roads contribute to a strong “sense of place” that appeals to residents and visitors alike. The people who have called Somerset County home for thousands of years have created a unique cultural environment unlike any other. From the ancient settlements in the “Turkeyfoot” region of the south, to the rolling farm country of Brothers Valley in the center, to the coal patch towns of the north, history is everywhere in Somerset County. Something interesting always seems to lie just around the next bend in the road. The county’s development was shaped by its hydrology and rugged topography. Although its forested hills hid immeasurable mineral wealth just below the surface they also limited the areas suitable for settlement and agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridge Summary
    BRIDGE SUMMARY KEY PBB Prestressed Butted Boxes PIB Prestressed I-Beams Each bridge has data listed on three lines, the top line being structure specific PSB Prestressed Spread Boxes information, the second line being comments and roadway specific information. PSC Prestressed Concrete The third line being the condition of major elements of the bridge. PSS Prestressed Solid Slabs PTB Prestressed Tee Beams The Top line consists of PVS Prestressed Voided Slabs SA Steel Arch Bridge Coordinate Number SRF Steel Rigid Frame Facility Carried by the Structure SWING Swing Bridge Feature Crossed TB Timber Bridge Date of most recent Inspection TB-C Covered Bridge Federal Sufficiency Rating (%) TB-CS Timber Bridge Conc. Slab Owner of the bridge TPG Thru Plate Girder Type of Bridge: TS Timber Slab BAIB Bailey or similar bridge TS-P Prestressed Timber Slab BAS Bascule Span BGB Beam Girder Bridge Width of the bridge CA Concrete Arch Some buried structures are coded with Zero Width CACUL Concrete Arch Culvert Length of the bridge CAR Concrete Arch Rib Number of bridge spans CB Concrete Box A flag indicating that the structure meets the federal definition of a CB-P Concrete Box-Precast bridge CP Concrete Pipe Recommended Weight limit Posting: CRF Concrete Rigid Frame CRF-P Concrete Rigid Frame-Precast E1, E2, C1, C2 & C3 - Restrictions for Certified Vehicles. CS Concrete Slab CPP Corrugated Polymer Pipe NOTE: The NHDOT has taken the position that the Town or City is CTB Concrete Tee Beam responsible for the evaluation of their bridges. Until evaluated, we CTC Concrete Timber Composite recommend all Town and City owned bridges be Posted "E-2".
    [Show full text]
  • Bridge Engineering
    PND Engineers, Inc., founded in 1979, is a full-service consulting engineering firm that provides civil, marine, geotechnical, structural, surveying, and construction inspection services for a wide range of projects. Tanana River Bridge Work Trestle | Tok, Alaska Koloa Bridge | Tyonek, Alaska HHIGHWAYIGHWAY PEDESTRIAN RECRECRR RRAILROADAILROAD PIPELINE FLOATFLOATII TTEMPORARYEMPORARY PRE-STRESSED C SSTEELTEEL TRUSSBRIDGE CONCRETE SLA Chief Joseph Dam Bridge | Bridgeport, Washington BOX-GIRDERENGINEERING SSTEELT EEL I-GIRDEI-GIRDERR GLULAMPLANNING, TIMBER DESIGN & PERMITTING TRUSS COCOVV Bridge Engineering Capabilities Design Expertise: Highway Bridges Site Selection TTIMBERIMBER WORK ACCESS TRESTRESTT High-Capacity Bridges Geotechnical Analysis Railroad Bridges Hydrology & Hydraulics HHIGHWAYIGHWAY PEDESTRIAN RECRECRR Pipeline Bridges Structural Design & Modeling Pedestrian & Multi-Use Bridges Permitting & Environmental Floating Bridges Seismic Conditions RRAILROADAILROAD PIPELINE FLOATFLOATII Construction/Temporary Bridges Construction Inspection Existing Bridge Evaluations TTEMPORARYEMPORARY PRE-STRESSED C SSTEELTEEL TRUSS CONCRETE SLA P Headquarters: N D Anchorage Office Juneau Office Seattle Office BOX-GIRDER SSTEELT EEL I-GIRDEI-GIRDERR E NGINEERS, I NC. 1506 West 36th Avenue 9360 Glacier Highway, Suite 100 811 First Avenue, Suite 570 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Juneau, Alaska 99801 Seattle, Washington 98104 GLULAM TIMBER TRUSS COCOVV Phone: 907.561.1011 Phone: 907.586.2093 Phone: 206.624.1387 Fax: 907.563.4220 Fax: 907.586.2099 Fax: 206.624.1388 TTIMBERIMBER HIGHWAY PEDESTRPEDESTRII For additional information please visit our website. www.pndengineers.com RRECREATIONALECREATIONAL RAILROAD P FFLOATINGLOATING TEMPORARYPND PREPRE-- c Copyright 2012, PND Engineers, Inc. CONCRECONCRETET E STEELST EEL TRUSSTE NGINEERS,RUSS I NC. CO P N D HIGHWAY BRIDGES Bridge engineering requires an understanding of not only structural design and analysis but also of the environmental conditions ENGINEERS, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • BEAVERKILL BRIDGE HAER NY-329 National Covered Bridges
    BEAVERKILL BRIDGE HAER NY-329 National Covered Bridges Recording Project NY-329 Spanning Beaver Kill, TR 30 (Craigie Claire Road) Roscoe vicinity Sullivan County New York PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240-0001 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD BEAVERKILL BRIDGE HAERNo.NY-329 LOCATION: Spanning Beaver Kill, TR 30 (Craigie Claire Road), Roscoe Vicinity, Sullivan County, New York UTM: 18.513568E.4647736N, Livingston Manor, NY Quad. STRUCTURAL TYPE: Wood covered bridge, modified Town lattice truss DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: 1865 DESIGNER/ BUILDER: John Davidson, Shin Creek, Rockland Township, New York PRESENT OWNER: Sullivan County, New York PREVIOUS USE: Vehicular bridge PRESENT USE: Vehicular bridge SIGNIFICANCE: The Beaverkill Bridge is a distinctive regional variation of a Town lattice truss with fanlike radiating planks in the end panels. It is the best preserved of three surviving examples of this type, all of which are attributed to John Davidson, a local carpenter-builder. HISTORIAN: Researched and written by Lola Bennett, with additions by Joseph Con will, based on new information found in the Richard Sanders Allen Collection, National Society for the Preservation of Covered Bridges, February 2003. PROJECT INFORMATION: The National Covered Bridges Recording Project is part of the Historic American Engineering Record (HAER), a long-range program to document historically significant engineering and industrial works in the United States. HAER is part of the Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering Record, a division of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior.
    [Show full text]
  • Humpback Covered Bridge HAER No. VA-1 Covington Vicinity Alleghany County NAKSJ^ Virginia V^
    Humpback Covered Bridge HAER No. VA-1 Covington Vicinity Alleghany County NAKSJ^ Virginia v^ 3 - Co\J, PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA REDUCED 8" X 10" DRAWINGS Historic American Engineering Record National Park Service Department of the Interior Washington D.C. 20240 pA%e \ COvUA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD VA-1 HUHBACK COVERED BRIDGE Date: 1835. Location: Covington Vic. Alleghany Co. Va. Built by: original: James River and Kanawha Turnpike Corp. present: Virginia Dept. of Highways. Significance: The. oldest surviving wooden bridge in Virginia "Old Hunfbacks" curved multiple kingpost form is unique to America. Historian: Donald C. Jackson Humpback Covered Bridge HAER VA-1 (Page ,2) The Humpback Bridge, located adjacent to Virginia Rte. 60 and crossing Dunlops Creek near Covington, was built in 1835 as a part of the Kanawha Turnpike. [1] It is the oldest covered bridge in Virginia. Originally three bridges of this design were built across Dunlops Creek, all by a man known as Mr. Venable of Lewisburg and his assistant, Tomas Kincaid. [2] All three were part of the Kanawha Turnpike, a roadway 208 miles long designed to connect the market centers of eastern Virginia with the rapidly developing frontier. [2] All three were part of the Kanawha Turnpike, a road 208 miles long designed to connect the market centers of eastern Virginia with the rapidly developing frontier. [3] Traversing the rugged Allegheny Mountains, it was the first (and only) transportation link between the James River and the Kanawha River prior to the Civil War, [4] As such, the Humpback Bridge played a vital role in one of America's early highways.
    [Show full text]
  • A Context for Common Historic Bridge Types
    A Context For Common Historic Bridge Types NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15 Prepared for The National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Council National Research Council Prepared By Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage October 2005 NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15 A Context For Common Historic Bridge Types TRANSPORATION RESEARCH BOARD NAS-NRC PRIVILEGED DOCUMENT This report, not released for publication, is furnished for review to members or participants in the work of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). It is to be regarded as fully privileged, and dissemination of the information included herein must be approved by the NCHRP. Prepared for The National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Council National Research Council Prepared By Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage October 2005 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SPONSORSHIP This work was sponsored by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration, and was conducted in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, which is administered by the Transportation Research Board of the National Research Council. DISCLAIMER The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied in the report are those of the research team. They are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board, the National Research Council, the Federal Highway Administration, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, or the individual states participating in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research reported herein was performed under NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15, by Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage. Margaret Slater, AICP, of Parsons Brinckerhoff (PB) was principal investigator for this project and led the preparation of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents for "Covered Bridge Topics"
    National Society for the Peservation of Covered Bridges Table of Contents for "Covered Bridge Topics" Volume I, No. 1 April 1943 Edited by: Richard Sanders Allen Oregon Bridges Destroyed Additions to Railroad Bridge List Volume I, No. 2 May 1943 Edited by: Richard Sanders Allen The Covered Bridges of the Walloomsac River Save the West Union Bridge Boston and Maine Railroad Bridge at Blake is Gone Cornish-Windsor Toll Bridge to Be Free Volume I, No. 3 June 1943 Edited by: Richard Sanders Allen Timothy Palmer Four North Carolina Covered Bridges by Barbara Brainerd The Only Covered Bridge in Wisconsin The Only Covered Bridge in Rhode Island Volume I, No. 4 July 1943 Edited by: Richard Sanders Allen Double Barreled Bridges The Only Covered Bridge in Kansas More Covered Railroad Bridges Whittlesey Work Reissued - Crossing and Recrossing the Connecticut River by C.W. Whittlesey Some Covered Bridge Notes from Indiana The Only Covered Bridge in Minnesota Volume I, No. 5 August 1943 Edited by: Richard Sanders Allen Lewis Wernwag Volume I, No. 6 September 1943 Edited by: Richard Sanders Allen Interstate Covered Bridges Volume I, No. 7 October 1943 Edited by: Richard Sanders Allen The Only Covered Bridge in Ontario Obituary: Basil Kievit Book Review: A History of the Development of Wooden Bridges by Robert Fletcher and J. P. Snow. Obituary: Daniel N. Wheeler Volume I, No. 8 November 1943 Edited by: Richard Sanders Allen Robert Murray Migrating Bridges Volume I, No. 9 December 1943 Edited by: Richard Sanders Allen Burr and Allen, Inc. Covered Wooden Aqueducts Printed Mon, August 30, 2021 Page 1 of 74 Volume I, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Covered Bridge Society October 1977; July 1984
    Indiana CB Society Newsletter Subject Index (P) - a picture of the bridge is included 1913 Flood Connersville April 1980 General information July 1984 Mississinewa January 1978 25th Anniversary of the Indiana Covered Bridge October 1988 Society 40 people killed by being knocked off bridge April 1987 A frame Iron Bridge January 1988 Aaron Wolfe January 1990 Adams Construction Company October 1973 Adamson October 1965; July 1968; April 1970 Aerial Photos October 1971 Alabama April 1964 Alabama Bridges April 1982 Albert Boone death April 1987 Allen January 1984 Allen, Richard Sanders April 1974; July 1974 American Covered Bridge Historical Society January 1972; January 1975 American Covered Bridge Society July 1965 Anderson River January 1968 Aqueduct Bridges October 1966; January 1968; April 1968; April 1969; April 1984 Arkansas July 1969 Arson January 1964; April 1964; January 1965; October 1965; January 1966; April 1966; July 1966; January 1967; July 1967; October 1967; April 1968; July 1968; October 1968; January 1969 Atlas of Indiana for 1876 July 1971; January 1972 Attica Map April 1985; January 1989 Auto Blue Book October 1981 Awards for Rush County Heritage Group July 1987 Printed Mon, March 21, 2016 Page 1 of 58 Bailey January 1979; January 1980; April 1981; January 1982; July 1982; October 1984 Bailey, Marjorie April 1981 Ball, Will January 1983 Baltimore Petit Iron Truss April 1989 Barker July 1978; October 1978; January 1979; January 1984 Barnett January 1978; April 1978 Beals January 1982 Beals, Fred January 1974; October 1974 Bibliography of Rail Road Bridges October 1983 Big Walnut Reservoir October 1966; January 1968; April 1968; January 1969; July 1969; October 1969; April 1970 Bille Hargrave death October 1978 Billie Creek Village January 1970; October 1979; July 1980; January 1981; October 1981; October 1982; July 1984 Birds Eye View Map April 1985; January 1989 Bishop July 1971 Blunk, R.O., Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Bridges Historic Bridges 397 Survey Report for Historic Highway Bridges
    6 HISTORIC BRIDGES HISTORIC BRIDGES 397 SURVEY REPORT FOR HISTORIC HIGHWAY BRIDGES HIGHWAY FOR HISTORIC REPORT SURVEY 1901-1920 PERIOD By the turn of the century, bridge design, as a profession, had sufficiently advanced that builders ceased erecting several of the less efficient truss designs such as the Bowstring, Double Intersection Pratt, or Baltimore Petit trusses. Also, the formation of the American Bridge Company in 1901 eliminated many small bridge companies that had been scrambling for recognition through unique truss designs or patented features. Thus, after the turn of the century, builders most frequently erected the Warren truss and Pratt derivatives (Pratt, Parker, Camelback). In addition, builders began to erect concrete arch bridges in Tennessee. During this period, counties chose to build the traditional closed spandrel design that visually evoked the form of the masonry arch. Floods in 1902 and 1903 that destroyed many bridges in the state resulted in counties going into debt to undertake several bridge replacement projects. One of the most concentrated bridge building periods at a county level occurred shortly before World War I as a result of legislation the state passed in 1915 that allowed counties to pass bond issues for road and bridge construction. Consequently, several counties initiated large road construction projects, for example, Anderson County (#87, 01-A0088-03.53) and Unicoi County (#89, 86-A0068- 00.89). This would be the last period that the county governments were the most dominant force in road and bridge construction. This change in leadership occurred due to the creation of the Tennessee State Highway Department in 1915 and the passage of the Federal Aid Highway Act of 1916.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Technology of Lemuel Chenoweth's Covered Bridges
    History and Technology of Lemuel Chenoweth’s Covered Bridges by Daniel Richard Gleave Sc.B. Civil Engineering Brown University, 2013 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ENGINEERING IN CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JUNE 2014 © 2014 Daniel Richard Gleave. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author:_______________________________________________________ Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering May 9, 2014 Certified By:_____________________________________________________________ John A. Ochsendorf Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Architecture Thesis Supervisor Accepted By:_____________________________________________________________ Heidi M. Nepf Chair, Departmental Committee for Graduate Students History and Technology of Lemuel Chenoweth’s Covered Bridges by Daniel Richard Gleave Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering on May 9, 2014 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Engineering in Civil and Environmental Engineering ABSTRACT Lemuel Chenoweth was a carpenter and bridge builder who played a key role in the development of the infrastructure of antebellum Virginia. Theodore Burr and Lewis Wernwag are among the designers who influenced the structure and construction of his bridges, two of which are currently standing in West Virginia. The timber covered bridge at Beverly is one of Chenoweth’s key creations that have been lost, which was at the time located on a key turnpike running through the county seat.
    [Show full text]
  • Water, Networks and Crossings Contents Contents
    WATER , NETWORKS AND CROSSINGS CONTENTS 3 Water, networks and crossings Contents Contents .............................................................................................................................................. 164 3.1 WATER BALANCE ............................................................................................................................ 166 3.1.1 Earth ....................................................................................................................................... 166 3.1.2 Evaporation and precipitation ................................................................................................. 167 3.1.3 Runoff ..................................................................................................................................... 169 3.1.4 Static balance ......................................................................................................................... 174 3.1.5 Movement ignoring resistance................................................................................................ 175 3.1.6 Resistance .............................................................................................................................. 178 3.1.7 Erosion and sedimentation ..................................................................................................... 184 3.1.8 Hydraulic geometry of stream channels ................................................................................. 186 3.1.9 River morphology...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]