DOCSLIB.ORG

OFFENDERS in NJ CORRECTIONAL Institutions AVERAGE DAILY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OFFENDERS in NJ CORRECTIONAL Institutions AVERAGE DAILY If you have issues viewing or accessing this file, please contact us at NCJRS.gov. DEMR1MENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF NEW JERSEY WILLIAM H. MUVER, COMMISSIONER '\\. ~\ 120399 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the pers?n or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated In this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material has been grantedNew by Jersey Department --oI-C6rrecTlorts---~-- -------- to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis­ sion of the copyright owner. OFFENDERS IN N.J. CORRECTIONAL iNSTITUTIONS AVERAGE DAILY POPULATION 'DURING 'FISCAL 1988 DIVISION OF POLICY AND PLANNING OFFICE OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND PLANNING MARCH 10; 1Mt TABLE OF CONTENTS I nt roduct i on ......................................... Fiscal 1984 - 1988 ......•............•................ 2,3 Fiscal 1988 Averago Daily Population By Institutional Complex: Prison Complex .....................•.................. 4,5 Youth Correctional Complex ............................ 6 Adult Pre-Release Centers, and Contract Halfway Houses.............. • . .. 7 Juvenile Complex ...................................... 8 Juvenile Community Residential and Day Programs...................................... 9 End of the Month Counts During Fiscal 1987 .•.......... 10,11,12 Notes ..........•...................................... 13 N.CJRS NOV 1.5 1984 .~CQUIS1'fnON S INTRODUCTION This report has been developed to provide informaiton regarding the Average Daily Population (ADP) in each Correctional Complex, Major Institution and Satellite Housing Unit under the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections dUring Fiscal Year 1988 (July I, 1987 to June 30, 1988). In addition, Average Daily Population (ADP) and end of month counts are reported for the community and Residential Juvenile Programs. The Prison Complex includes the New Jersey State, East Jersey State, Bayside State, Mid-State, Southern State, Northern State and Riverfront State Prisons, the Edna Mahan Correctional Facility for Women and the Adult Diagnostic and Treatment Center. The Youth Correctional Complex consists of the Garden State Reception and Youth Correctional Facility, the Albert C. Wagner Youth Correctional Facility and the Mountainview Youth Correctional Facility. The Juvenile Facilities include the New Jersey Training School for Boys, the Lloyd McCorkle Training School for Boys and Girls, and the Juvenile Medium Security Facility. The Average Daily Population for each major institution reported in Table I includes the number of inmates housed at the main institution ~ those inmates who are assigned to each of the respective satelli'te units and prefabricated modular units where applicable. Average daily population counts for each of the individual housing units are reported in Tables II through V. Major institutions with satellites include the following: MAJOR INSTITUTION SATELLITES New Jersey state Prison New Jersey Main, West Trenton Unit, Vroom Readjustment Unit and Central Medical Unit East Jersey state Prison East Jersey Main, East Jersey Camp and Marlboro Camp Bayside State Prison Bayside Medium, Bayside Farm and Ancora Unit Garden State Reception Garden State Main, Wharton Tract, youth Reception and Youth Correctional Facility and Prison Reception Albert C. Wagner Youth Wagner Main, New Lisbon Unit and NPDC Unit Correctional Facility Mountainview youth Moutainview Main, Stokes Unit and High Point Unit Correctional Facility ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The prepal'ation of this report entailed the assistance of numerous individuals and reporting units, The extensive data collection effort was significantly enhanced by the assistance of the Correctional Information and Classification Services Data Base, the Prison and Youth Reception Units and the Office of the Deputy Director of the Division of Juvenile Services. Special acknowledgement is given to Mrs. Terry Lihvarcik, Principal Statistical Clerk of the Office of Policy Analysis and Planning for the compilation of data and the layout of the report format. 1 'Offenders in New Jersey Correctional Institutions Fiscal 1984 - 1988 Trends AVERAGE POPULATION DURING FISCAL YEARS ENDING SEPARATELY 8UDGETED CORRECTIONAL JUNE NET% JUNE NET% JUNE NET% JUNE NET% JUNE INSTITUTIONS 1984 CHANGE 1985 CHANGE 1986 CHANGE 1987 CHANGE 1988 TOTAL INSTITUTIONS 11429 13% 12881 8% 13868 15% 15911 9% 17376 COUNTY WAITING LIST 893 41% 1259 -3% 1226 45% 1779 13% 2007 COUNTY CONTRACT 90 16% 104 8% 112 13% 127 3% 131 COUNTY ASSISTANCE 0 104 89% 197 48% 291 15% 334 JUVENILE WAITING LIST 47 -45% 26 73% 45 204% 137 -58% 58 STATE PRISON 1/ 6346 14% 7265 8% 7855 8% 8502 13% 9633 New Jersey State Prison 1906 12% 2144 5% 2241 3% 2309 -1% 2292 East Jersey State Prison 1470 3% 1517 -1% 1499 8% 1620 6% 1724 8ayside State Prison 1287 7% 1381 4% 1437 4% 1501 9% 1629 Edna Mahan Crrntl Felty 356 12% 400 8% 433 8% 466 14% 530 Mid-State Corrtnl Felty 490 -1% 485 -0% 483 1% 489 7% 523 Southern State Corrntl Felty 557 85% 1032 4% 1078 11% 1196 5% 1251 Riverfront State Prison 336 32% 445 4% 465 Northern State Corrtnl Felty 96 718% 785 Adult Dia/Treat Center 280 9% 306 14% 348 9% 380 14% 434 ADULT HALFWAY HSES 53 2% 54 9% 59 12% 66 5% 69 Newark (Men) 41 5% 43 5% 45 20% 54 4% 56 Essex (Women) 12 -8% 11 27% 14 -14% 12 8% 13 CONTRACT HALFWAY HSES 86 28% 110 15% 126 43% 180 23% 222 Clinton House 18 39% 25 0% 25 16% 29 10% 32 VOA (Camden) 26 50% 39 26% 49 47% 72 22% 88 Pyramid House (Nwk) 16 -13% 14 0% 14 71% 24 67% 40 Bates House 17 -12% 15 7% 16 0% 16 13% 18 Mutual Agreement Program 9 44% 13 -15% 11 27% 14 21% 17 Turning Point Blackwood 3 167% 8 -13% 7 29% 9 C.U.R.A. 1 200% 3 100% 6 0% 6 T.L.C. 12 0% 12 YOUTH CORRCTL INSTITUTIONS 1/ 2941 2% 2987 4% 3102 13% 3499 2% 3552 Garden State Rcpt&Yth Crrtnl 988 2% 1004 5% 1054 9% 1144 1% 1160 Albert C Wagner Yth Crrtnl 910 1% 915 5% 961 15% 1104 1% 1115 Mountainvfew Yth Crrtnl Fclty 1043 2% 1068 2% 1087 15% 1251 2% 1277 JUVENILE FACILITIES 581 -4% 557 11r. 618 16% 716 -1% 708 New Jersey Training Schl-Boys 315 -2% 310 7% 332 21% 403 0% 403 Lloyd McCorkle Trng Schl 171 -16% 143 23% 176 13% 198 -4% 190 Juvenile Medium Security Felty 95 9% 104 6% 110 5% 115 0% 115 Community and Residential 392 6% 415 27% 528 16% 614 8% 663 Juvenile Programs 2 NOTES ON FISCAL 1984 - 1988 TRENDS During the Fiscal ¥ear of 1988 there was an Average Daily Population of 17,377 offenders in the Department of Corrections, 9634 of whom were housed in State Prison Facilities while 3552 were housed in Youth Correctional Facilities, 708 were housed in Juvenile Facilities. Two hundred ninety-one were housed in Halfway Houses, 662 in Community and Residential Programs and 2530 were housed in County Facilities. From Fiscal 1987 to Fiscal 1988 the ADP for the Department as a whole increased 9% from 15,911 to 17,377 offenders. The ADP during Fiscal 1988 was greater than the peak populations experienced in 1984 through 1987. The following are the changes within the various correctional complexes or facilities: - The County Waiting list increased 13% from 1779 to 2007. - The State Prison Complex count increased 13% from 8502 to 9634 . .. The Youth Correctional Complex count increased 2% from 3499 to 3552. - The Juvenile Facilities population decreased 1% from 716 to 708. - The Community Residential Juvenile Programs increased 8% from 614 to 662. The continued increase in adult institutional population resulted from ongoing impact of Title 2C and legislative enhancements to the Criminal Code. There also was a countinued increase in the number of juvenile offenders residing in Juvenile Community Residential and Day Programs during this period. The average daily population for these facilities in Fiscal 1988 was 662 or 8% greater than the Fiscal 1987 count of 614. 3 ~-~~--~---------------,--~--~~- TABLE II AVERAGE DAILY POPULATION FOR THE NEW JERSEY PRISON COMPLEX DURING FISCAL 1988 PRISON COMPLEX AVERAGE DAILY POPULATION . TOTAL AI 9633 NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON 2292 New Jersey Main 1951 West Trenton Unit 159 Vroom Readjustment Unit 134 Central Medical Unit 48 EAST JERSEY STATE PRISON 1724 East Jersey Main 1481 East Jersey Camp 115 Marl bora Camp 128 BAYSIDE STATE PRISON 1629 Bayside Main 887 Bayside Fann 525 Ancora Unit 217 MID-STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 523 SOUTHERN STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 1251 RIVERFRONT STATE PRISON 465 NORTHERN STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 785 ADULT DIAGNOSTIC AND TREATMENT CENTER 434 EDNA MAHAN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 530 Men 42 WOOlen 488 AI See Note on page 13. 4 'PRISON COMPLEX AVERAGE DAILY POPULATION New Jersey State Prison (main and satellites) had an average population of 2293 residents during Fiscal 1988 which represented 23% of those offenders housed in all prison facilities. New Jersey Main had an average population count of 1951 with the West Trenton minimum security satellite accounting for an additional 159 daily residents. The maximum security Vroom Readjustment Unit maintained an average population of 134 during the 1988 Fiscal Year. The Central Medical Unit had an average count of 48 offenders. Of the 9633 average daily offenders housed in State Prison Facilities during the year. 1724 or 8% were resident at East Jersey State Prison. The main institution had an average population of 1481. with minimum security units averaging an additional 243. Bayside State Prison accounted for approximately 7% of the residents housed in the Prison Complex with an average count of 1629. Bayside Main (medium unit) maintained an average population of 887 while the minimum security satellite units housed an additional 742 residents. The average population for Mid-State Correctional Facility during Fiscal 1988 represented approximately 5% of those offenders housed in all prison facilities, with an average population of 523.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • As the Parties and This Court Are Intimately Familiar with the Factual
    Case 1:97-cv-05127-RBK-JS Document 1012 Filed 05/19/08 Page 1 of 10 PageID: <pageID> (Not for Publication) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE ___________________________________ : : IN RE: : Civil No. 97-5127 (RBK) : BAYSIDE PRISON LITIGATION : OPINION : : ___________________________________ : KUGLER, United States District Judge: Presently before the Court are two motions by all defendants (“Defendants”) for summary judgment, one against Plaintiff Jose Baez (“Baez”) and the other against Plaintiff David Kelly (“Kelly”). This lawsuit, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, stems from events alleged to have taken place at Bayside State Prison (“Bayside”) in July, August, and September of 1997. For the reasons set forth below, this Court will grant Defendants’ motion for summary judgment against Baez and dismiss their motion against Kelly, who is no longer a party to this case. I. BACKGROUND1 During July, August, and September of 1997, Bayside experienced a “lockdown” following the murder of Senior Corrections Officer Fred Baker by an inmate. The plaintiffs in this lawsuit were inmates at Bayside during this lockdown who allege that prison officials 1As the parties and this Court are intimately familiar with the factual background underlying this ten-year-old case, this Opinion will contain only a brief recitation of relevant facts. 1 Case 1:97-cv-05127-RBK-JS Document 1012 Filed 05/19/08 Page 2 of 10 PageID: <pageID> violated their civil rights during this time period. Baez alleges that officers at Bayside assaulted him on July 31, 1997. He remained incarcerated at Bayside until October 24, 1997, when he was transferred to Northern State Prison.
    [Show full text]
  • 05-09-06 TAGP Complete
    Task Force Meeting of ASSEMBLY PRISON GANG VIOLENCE TASK FORCE "The Task Force will meet to discuss safety issues at State correctional facilities" LOCATION: University of Medicine and Dentistry of DATE: May 9, 2006 New Jersey 11:00 a.m. Newark, New Jersey MEMBERS OF TASK FORCE PRESENT: Assemblyman Jeff Van Drew, Chair Kerry Riebe, Vice Chair Bob Balicki Joseph Butler Michael DeBellis Mike Makara Lieutenant Bill Paglione ALSO PRESENT: Mellany Alio Office of Legislative Services Task Force Aide Meeting Recorded and Transcribed by The Office of Legislative Services, Public Information Office, Hearing Unit, State House Annex, PO 068, Trenton, New Jersey TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Cecile A. Feldman, D.M.D. Dean New Jersey Dental School University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey 1 Michael Smith Private Citizen 5 Richard Szollar Private Citizen 38 William Davis Private Citizen 60 William Toolen Private Citizen 60 Sly Brown Private Citizen 85 George Adams Private Citizen 93 rs: 1-111 ASSEMBLYMAN JEFF VAN DREW (Chair): I’d like to call this meeting of the Assembly Prison Gang Violence Task Force meeting to order. Before we would begin-- We’ve been very fortunate to have these beautiful new facilities here. And we do have the Dean of the school here, Dean Feldman, who would just like to say a few words of welcome and hello. C E C I L E A. F E L D M A N, D.M.D.: Thank you. Let me just take a moment to welcome everyone to the New Jersey Dental School. For those of you that are not aware of the school, we’re the largest provider for oral health care services to the underserved throughout the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Section Iii-A Seven-Year Capital Improvement
    Section III-A Seven Year Capital Improvement Plan SECTION III-A SEVEN-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FISCAL 2011 – 2017 Department of Agriculture Department of Children and Families Department of Corrections Department of Education Section III-A, Page 1 Section III-A Seven Year Capital Improvement Plan Section III-A, Page 2 Section III-A Seven Year Capital Improvement Plan Fiscal Year 2011 7 Year Agency Summary of Capital Requests and Recommendations General Fund * Amounts Expressed in Thousands (000's) FY 2011 Total 7 Yr Request Request Request Request Commission DEPARTMENT Program FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 - 2017 Recommendation Department of Agriculture $5,022 $5,022 $0 $0 $0 $0 Department of Children and Families $2,535 $895 $300 $330 $1,010 $0 Department of Corrections $1,146,786 $301,555 $145,697 $501,278 $198,256 $5,312 Department of Education $11,873 $1,350 $2,026 $4,322 $4,175 $400 Department of Environmental Protection $1,498,021 $386,965 $418,109 $393,422 $299,525 $93,371 Department of Human Services $300,061 $160,862 $48,265 $29,778 $61,156 $4,000 Department of Law and Public Safety $11,059 $11,059 $0 $0 $0 $0 Juvenile Justice Commission $73,805 $18,404 $17,064 $21,787 $16,550 $1,000 Department of Military and Veterans Affairs $27,911 $8,048 $4,660 $5,728 $9,475 $0 Department of State $197 $197 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rutgers, The State University $1,341,728 $243,379 $236,109 $278,749 $583,491 $0 University of Medicine and Dentistry $1,867,803 $659,770 $363,340 $237,288 $607,405 $0 New Jersey Institute of Technology $544,264 $117,368
    [Show full text]
  • The Palgrave Handbook of Incarceration in Popular Culture
    The Palgrave Handbook of Incarceration in Popular Culture Edited by Marcus Harmes · Meredith Harmes Barbara Harmes The Palgrave Handbook of Incarceration in Popular Culture “This fascinating and wide-ranging collection provides new insights into representa- tions of, and our understanding of, carcerality. The chapters here force us to address cultural beliefs about the purposes and morality of different modes of incarceration, as well as illuminating the ways in which fantasies of imprisonment fuel innumerable depictions in flm and TV. Impressive in both its breadth and depth it is an important contribution to the scholarly debate in this feld.” —Dr. Mark Readman, Principal Academic in Media Education, Bournemouth University Marcus Harmes · Meredith Harmes · Barbara Harmes Editors The Palgrave Handbook of Incarceration in Popular Culture Editors Marcus Harmes Meredith Harmes Open Access College Open Access College University of Southern Queensland University of Southern Queensland Toowoomba, QLD, Australia Toowoomba, QLD, Australia Barbara Harmes Open Access College University of Southern Queensland Toowoomba, QLD, Australia ISBN 978-3-030-36058-0 ISBN 978-3-030-36059-7 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36059-7 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifcally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microflms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2020
    State of New Jersey Office of the Corrections Ombudsperson ANNUAL REPORT 10/01/19 to 09/30/20 State of New Jersey OFFICE OF THE CORRECTIONS OMBUDSPERSON ANNUAL REPORT Table of Contents Introduction 3 Historical Perspective 5 Mission, Goals, and Objectives 6 Operating Procedures 7 Corrections Ombudsperson’s Staff 8 Accomplishments 8 Goal Assessment 9 General Information and Recommendations 10 Goals and Projects 21 Inmate Contacts Aggregated to Include All Facilities 23 Inmate Contacts Disaggregated by State Prison Facilities 25 Page 2 of 50 State of New Jersey OFFICE OF THE CORRECTIONS OMBUDSPERSON ANNUAL REPORT Introduction The Office of the Corrections Ombudsperson has successfully operated for forty-eight years. Throughout the year, staff continued to assist inmates, residents, attorneys, outside agencies, and the general public with matters relating to incarcerated offenders and committed sexually violent predators. The Department of Corrections (DOC) has an obligation to ensure that all persons committed to State Correctional Facilities and Residential Community Release Programs are provided with the custody, care, training, and treatment needed to prepare them for reintegration back into the community. Oversight by an independent body is essential to ensure the integrity of the system, administrative accountability, and to protect the rights of the incarcerated. The Corrections Ombudsperson’s role has a long and honorable tradition as a means of protecting against abuse, bias, and other improper treatment or unfairness. The Office of the Corrections Ombudsperson provides a concerned medium within which “State” sentenced inmates can seek redress for concerns that arise during incarceration regarding their living conditions, treatment, or any allegations of maladministration or inaction by correctional authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • State of New Jersey Office of the Corrections Ombudsperson
    State of New Jersey Office of the Corrections Ombudsperson ANNUAL REPORT 10/01/19 to 09/30/20 OFFICE OF THE CORRECTIONS OMBUDSPERSON ANNUAL REPORT Table of Contents Introduction 3 Historical Perspective 5 Mission, Goals, and Objectives 6 Operating Procedures 7 Corrections Ombudsperson’s Staff 8 Accomplishments 8 Goal Assessment 9 General Information and Recommendations 10 Goals and Projects 21 Inmate Contacts Aggregated to Include All Facilities 23 Inmate Contacts Disaggregated by State Prison Facilities 25 Page 2 of 50 OFFICE OF THE CORRECTIONS OMBUDSPERSON ANNUAL REPORT Introduction The Office of the Corrections Ombudsperson has successfully operated for forty-eight years. Throughout the year, staff continued to assist inmates, residents, attorneys, outside agencies, and the general public with matters relating to incarcerated offenders and committed sexually violent predators. The Department of Corrections (DOC) has an obligation to ensure that all persons committed to State Correctional Facilities and Residential Community Release Programs are provided with the custody, care, training, and treatment needed to prepare them for reintegration back into the community. Oversight by an independent body is essential to ensure the integrity of the system, administrative accountability, and to protect the rights of the incarcerated. The Corrections Ombudsperson’s role has a long and honorable tradition as a means of protecting against abuse, bias, and other improper treatment or unfairness. The Office of the Corrections Ombudsperson provides
    [Show full text]
  • You Are Viewing an Archived Copy from the New Jersey State Library
    You are Viewing an Archived Copy from the New Jersey State Library You are Viewing an Archived Copy from the New Jersey State Library You are Viewing an Archived Copy from the New Jersey State Library Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................3 CHAIRMAN’S REPORT ........................................................................5 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S REPORT ...................................................7 “Production Totals and Percentage Increases: 2008 vs. 2009” Chart ..........................................................................9 “Production Totals, 1978-2009” Chart .............................................11 “Number of Film and Video Projects Using New Jersey Locations, 1978-2009” Graph ............................13 ECONOMIC IMPACT ...........................................................................21 “Economic Impact Statistics, 1978-2009” Chart .............................25 “Millions of Dollars Contributed to New Jersey Economy by Filmmaking Activity, 1978- 2009” Graph ...................................27 PRODUCTION SERVICES ..................................................................29 INTERNSHIP PROGRAM ....................................................................31 PRODUCTION LIST ............................................................................33 Features ............................................................................................35 Telefilms/Mini-Series .......................................................................43
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Corrections
    State of New Jersey Commission on Capital Budgeting and Planning Fiscal Year 2019 Seven Year Capital Improvement Plan Philip D. Murphy, Governor Sheila Y. Oliver, Lt. Governor Brian E. Francz Executive Director B. Carol Molnar Commission Chair Office of Management and Budget April 27, 2018 This document is available via the internet at http://www.state.nj.us/treasury/omb/ Table of Contents Page Section I: Introduction Commission Members ............................................................................................................................. 1 Commission Staff ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Summary of the Fiscal 2019 State Capital Improvement Plan ................................................................ 3 Section II: Fiscal Year 2019 Recommendations by Department Summary of Capital Requests and Recommendations ............................................................................ 9 Department of Children and Families .................................................................................................... 10 Department of Corrections ..................................................................................................................... 11 Department of Environmental Protection .............................................................................................. 13 Department of Health ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Testimonies of Torture in New Jersey Prisons
    Testimonies of Torture in New Jersey Prisons EVIDENCE OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS A collection of testimonies from prisoners in New Jersey prisons, documenting uses of physical, chemical, and no-touch torture, among other human rights abuses. American Friends Service Committee Northeast Region Healing Justice Program Edited by: Bonnie Kerness Director, Prison Watch Program 89 Market Street, 6th floor Newark, NJ 07102 (973) 643-3192 Editorial Assistant Jessica Gonzalez Intern, Prison Watch Program Torture in New Jersey Prisons ǀ Evidence of Human Rights Violations February 2015 INTRODUCTION The American Friends Service Committee (AFSC) is a Quaker faith based organization that promotes lasting peace with justice, as a practical expression of faith in action. AFSC’s interest in prison reform is strongly influenced by Quaker (Religious Society of Friends) activism addressing prison conditions as informed by the imprisonment of Friends for their beliefs and actions in the 17th and 18th centuries. AFSC has spoken out on behalf of prisoners whose voices are all too frequently silenced. Drawing on continuing spiritual insights and working with people of many backgrounds, we nurture the seeds of change and respect for human life that transform social relations and systems. For over two decades, the Prison Watch Program of the American Friends Service Committee, located in Newark, NJ, has been collecting testimonies in the form of letters from prisoners across the United States. These letters document various human rights abuses in US prisons, including, but not limited to, physical, chemical, and no-touch torture at the local, state and federal levels. It is clear that the concepts of international human rights law need to find their way into the US law enforcement, judicial and prison systems.
    [Show full text]
  • “From the Inside Out”
    “FROM THE INSIDE OUT” A report by the Prison Watch Community Oversight Initiative December 2016 Issue #1 This report was created by Program Director Bonnie Kerness (973-410-3978/ [email protected]), Interns Rachel Frome and Marshall Justice Rountree, and with further assistance from Jean Ross, Esq. and CLASP’s Kunal Sharma, Esq. and Billimarie Lubiano Robinson. Prison Watch Program 89 Market St, 6th Floor Newark, NJ 07102 (973) 643-3192 Dear Friends, This first issue of Inside Out: The Prison Watch Community Oversight Initiative, was suggested by the people confined in the NJ penal system a number of years ago to provide people in the community with specific examples of conditions in our state’s prisons. Their feeling - and ours - has been that this kind of initiative will enable more people to better understand the prison system, which is expensive, dysfunctional and largely concealed sector of our society. We believe that such understanding will enable and motivate communication and collaboration in order to more effectively address the problems emerging from these inside reports. We also hope that the connections we create will enable us to eventually serve as an Emergency Response Network, with the capacity to counter individual as well as systemic instances of harm, when the need arises. We think that the information that we distribute should prompt formal legislation that decrees independent prison oversight. The voices reflected in the reports below are those who have agreed to stay in touch with community-based advocates on a regular basis. They are giving us information regarding what is happening to and around them.
    [Show full text]
  • Bid Solicitation Appendix a 19Dpp00288 List and Facility Descriptions
    BID SOLICITATION APPENDIX A 19DPP00288 LIST AND FACILITY DESCRIPTIONS New Jersey State Prison – Second & Cass Street, Trenton, NJ -The maximum-security prison, located in Trenton, provides programs for adult male offenders. Work opportunities are provided by five State Use Industries shops within the prison for the production of materials and products to be used by various State agencies and local governments. Educational opportunities are comprehensive, covering adult basic education through college and including a five-cluster vocational education program. An Administration Segregation Unit inside the prison is available for housing and programming designed to treat the more severe behavioral problems which occur in the prison system. Vroom Central Reception and Assignment Facility, Sullivan Way, Trenton, NJ-The Central Reception and Assignment Facility serves as a central processing unit for all adult male offenders sentenced to the New Jersey Department of Corrections. It is responsible for objectively classifying all State inmates, and providing all intake examinations/evaluations, including medical, dental, educational, psychological, etc. The Jones Farm Minimum Security Unit is a satellite unit. It serves as a work camp for inmates serving non-violent short-term sentences. The facility supports the Central Reception and Assignment Facility in the delivery of food services, building and grounds maintenance/repairs and other activities as needed. East Jersey State Prison , US Rt. 1 @ Rahway Avenue, Woodbridge, NJ-This prison provides maximum, medium, and minimum-security programs for male adult offenders. Work opportunities are provided by five State Use Industries shops. Food service, grounds maintenance, institutional maintenance and farm services are provided by inmates at the North Jersey Developmental Center, Totowa.
    [Show full text]
  • Not for Publication* United States District
    Case 3:17-cv-02806-FLW-TJB Document 8 Filed 02/26/18 Page 1 of 17 PageID: <pageID> *NOT FOR PUBLICATION* UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY _________________________________________ SHAROB ABDUL-AZIZ, : : Plaintiff, : Civ. No. 17-2806 (FLW) (TJB) : v. : : GARY M. LANIGAN et al., : OPINION : Defendants. : _________________________________________ : FREDA L. WOLFSON, U.S.D.J. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Sharob Abdul-Aziz (“Abdul-Aziz”), is a state prisoner, presently incarcerated at East Jersey State Prison, in Rahway, New Jersey. He is proceeding pro se with a civil rights complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”), and the New Jersey Civil Rights Act (“NJCRA”). (ECF No. 1.) Presently before the Court is a motion by defendants, Gary M. Lanigan, Andrew P. Sidamon-Eristoff, and Jignasa Desai-McCleary (collectively, “Defendants”), for dismissal of the Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and (6). (ECF No. 4.) For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. II. BACKGROUND This action originated as Abdul-Aziz v. Lanigan, Civ. A. No. 14-2026 (FLW) (TJB), (“the Prior Action”) in which Abdul-Aziz, as well as three other plaintiffs, William McCray, Ibn Pasha, and Charles Rashid, asserted § 1983 and RLUIPA claims against Lanigan, as the commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Corrections (“NJDOC”), Sidamon-Eristoff and Case 3:17-cv-02806-FLW-TJB Document 8 Filed 02/26/18 Page 2 of 17 PageID: <pageID> Desai-McCleary, as officials with the New Jersey Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”), and Stephen D’Ilio, the administrator of New Jersey State Prison, who is no longer a party to this case.
    [Show full text]