DOCSLIB.ORG

The Criminal Code of Republika Srpska Published in the “Official Gazette of Republika Srpska”, 49/03, 108/04, 37/06, 70/06, 73/10, 1/12, 67/13

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Criminal Code of Republika Srpska Published in the “Official Gazette of Republika Srpska”, 49/03, 108/04, 37/06, 70/06, 73/10, 1/12, 67/13 Emerika Bluma 1, 71000 Sarajevo Tel. 28 35 00 Fax. 28 35 01 Department for Legal Affairs CRIMINAL CODE OF REPUBLIKA SRPSKA “Official Gazette of Republika Srpska”, 64/17 NOTE: On the day of entering into force of this Law, shall cease to be valid the Criminal Code of Republika Srpska published in the “Official Gazette of Republika Srpska”, 49/03, 108/04, 37/06, 70/06, 73/10, 1/12, 67/13. CRIMINAL CODE OF REPUBLIKA SRPSKA GENERAL PART CHAPTER ONE GENERAL PROVISIONS Basis and Function of the Criminal Legislation of the Republika Srpska Article 1 (1) Criminal law provisions contained in this Code shall be based on the Constitution of the Republika Srpska and the generally acknowledged principles and norms of international law. (2) The basic function of the criminal legislation of the Republika Srpska shall be to protect the fundamental human rights and freedoms and other fundamental individual and general values established by the Republika Srpska Constitution and international law. (3) This protection shall be implemented by defining the particular criminal offences, by specifying punishments and other criminal sanctions for the perpetration of these criminal offenses and by pronouncing the sentences against the offenders in the legally prescribed proceedings. Principle of Legality Article 2 (1) Criminal offences and criminal sanctions shall be prescribed only by law. (2) No punishment or other criminal sanction may be pronounced on any person for an act which, prior to being perpetrated, has not been defined as a criminal offence by law, and no punishment or another criminal sanction that has not been prescribed by such law cannot be pronounced against the person. Basis for criminal liability and Punishment Article 3 (1) The basis for criminal liability shall be the perpetration of a criminal offense with all of its characteristics that are prescribed by law. (2) No one may be punished nor may any alternative measures be pronounced against him/her unless he/she has been found criminally liable for a perpetrated criminal offense. Principle of Constraints Regarding Criminal Justice Compulsion Article 4 Criminal offenses and criminal sanctions shall be prescribed only for those unlawful acts by which the human rights and freedoms and other individual and general values of the society established by the Constitution and international law have thus been violated or jeopardized insomuch that their protection could not be achieved without using the benefits of criminal justice compulsion. Principle of equality of the criminal offense perpetrators Article 5 Perpetrators of criminal offenses shall be equal and subject to criminal liability irrespective 2 of the nature or type of the perpetrated criminal offense, ethnic, racial or religious affiliation, language, religious or political belief, colour, sex or sexual orientation, health status or gender identity, origin, political or social status or any other circumstances. Principle of Justice and Proportionality Article 6 Punishments and other criminal justice sanctions applied to the perpetrators of criminal offences should correspond to the nature and severity of the crime, the degree of criminal liability, the circumstances under which the offense was committed and the personality of the perpetrator. Principle of respect for human dignity and personality of the perpetrator Article 7 (1) In the execution of criminal sanctions the perpetrator may be deprived of certain rights or such rights may be restricted only if so is necessary for the execution of specific criminal sanctions and to the extent that corresponds to the nature and content of these sanctions. (2) Criminal sanctions shall be executed in such a way as to ensure respect for the perpetrator’s personality and his/her human dignity. (3) During the serving of the sentence of deprivation of liberty, it is necessary to respect the personality of the convicted individual, his/her physical and spiritual integrity. Such individuals shall not be subjected to any torture or other forms of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. In the event of such a treatment, they shall be provided with judicial protection. The Principle of Confiscation of Illegal Material Gain Article 8 Nobody shall be allowed to retain any material gain acquired by the perpetration of a criminal offence. The material gain and the proceeds or other forms of gain derived from the material gain acquired through a criminal offence shall be confiscated. CHAPTER TWO APPLICABILITY OF CRIMINAL LEGISLATION Time Constraints Regarding the Applicability of Criminal Legislation Article 9 (1) The legislation that was in force at the time when the criminal offence was perpetrated shall be applicable to the perpetrator of the criminal offence. If the legislation was amended at the time of perpetration of the criminal offence, the legislation that was in force at the time of completion of the criminal offence shall be applicable. (2) If, after the perpetration of a criminal offence and before the enactment of a final and binding judgment, the legislation was amended on one or more occasions, the legislation that is most lenient to the perpetrator shall be applicable. (3) The perpetrator of a criminal offense that is prescribed by legislation with a specified time of applicability shall be subject to application of that legislation, regardless of when he/she is being tried, unless otherwise determined by that legislation. (4) The rules of applicability of this Code referred to in paragraphs (1), (2) and (3) of this Article shall also be applicable in relation to the effect of the legal consequences of the conviction. 3 Territorial Applicability of Criminal Legislation Article 10 (1) Criminal legislation of the Republika Srpska shall be applicable to anybody who has perpetrated a criminal offence on its territory. (2) Criminal legislation of the Republika Srpska shall also be applicable to anybody who has perpetrated a criminal offense on board of a domestic vessel, regardless of its whereabouts at the time of the perpetration of the offense. (3) Criminal legislation of the Republika Srpska shall be applicable to anybody who has committed a criminal offense on board of a domestic civilian aircraft while in flight, regardless of the aircraft’s location at the time of the perpetration of the offense. (4) If, in the cases referred to in paragraphs (1), (2) and (3) of this Article, the criminal proceedings have been initiated or completed in a foreign country, the prosecution shall be undertaken in the Republika Srpska only upon the prior approval of the Chief Republic Prosecutor. (5) The criminal prosecution against foreign nationals in cases referred to in paragraphs (1), (2) and (3) of this Article may be transferred to a foreign State under the terms of reciprocity. Applicability of Criminal legislation of the Republika Srpska for Specific Offences Perpetrated Outside of the Territory of the Republika Srpska Article 11 Criminal legislation of Republika Srpska shall be applicable to anybody who has committed a criminal offence defined under Articles 278 through 305 of this Code outside its territory. Applicability of Criminal Legislation of the Republika Srpska to a Citizen of the Republika Srpska Committing a Criminal Offense Outside of its Territory Article 12 Criminal legislation of the Republika Srpska shall be applicable to a citizen of the Republika Srpska even when he/she has committed a criminal offence outside of its territory, except for the criminal offenses referred to in Article 11 of this Code, provided that he/she is found on the territory of Republika Srpska or has been extradited to the Republika Srpska. Applicability of Criminal Legislation of the Republika Srpska to a Foreign National Committing a Criminal Offence Outside its Territory Article 13 (1) Criminal legislation of the Republika Srpska shall also be applicable to a foreign national who has committed a criminal offense outside the territory of the Republika Srpska against Republika Srpska or against its citizen, even when the offense in question is some other than the one referred to under Article 11 of this Code, provided that he/she is found on the territory of the Republika Srpska or has been extradited to it. (2) Criminal Legislation of the Republika Srpska shall be applicable to a foreign national who has committed a criminal offense outside the territory of the Republika Srpska against another country or against a foreign national, for which offence the law of that country prescribes imprisonment for a term of five years or a heavier penalty, provided that the perpetrator is found on the territory of the Republika Srpska and does not get extradited to the other country. Unless it is stipulated otherwise in this Code, the court in such a case may not impose a heavier punishment than the one prescribed by the law of the country in which the criminal offense has been committed. 4 Special Preconditions for Prosecution Article 14 (1) In the cases referred to in Article 12 and Article 13 of this Code, the prosecution shall not be undertaken where: 1) the perpetrator has served the full punishment he was sentenced to abroad; 2) the perpetrator has been released or his/her sentence has been barred by lapse of time or he/she has been pardoned by a final and binding decision of a foreign court; 3) an appropriate security measure has been executed abroad against the perpetrator who is regarded as mentally incompetent; 4) according to the law of a foreign country, the prosecution for a criminal offence is normally undertaken on a personal complaint of the injured party, but such complaint has not be filed. (2) In the cases referred to in Article 12 and Article 13 of this Code, prosecution shall be undertaken only if the criminal offense in question is also punishable by the law of the country where the offense was committed, unless the offense has been committed against Republika Srpska and its citizens and when there is an approval of the Chief Republic Prosecutor.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Siege of Sarajevo Endangered Civilians
    BALKAN January 8, 2004 Page 6 VIEW FROM THE HAGUE SIEGE OF SARAJEVO ENDANGERED CIVILIANS On 5 December this year, the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia sentenced General Stanislav Gali ć to 20 years in prison for spreading terror among the civilian population during the siege of Sarajevo. The city of Sarajevo was under siege for about three and a half years. For almost two years of that time, from September 1992 to August 1994, General Gali ć was the commander of a branch of the Army of Republika Srpska (VRS), called the Sarajevo Romanija Corps, or SRK, which had virtually encircled Sarajevo. Parts of the city were controlled by the Army of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Prosecution alleged that the SRK under General Gali ć's command conducted a campaign of sniping and shelling attacks on civilians in Sarajevo. Under international humanitarian law war as such is not considered unlawful. However, certain principles of warfare apply that military commanders must respect. One such principle obliges military commanders to distinguish between military objectives, on the one hand, and civilians, on the other, and not to attack civilians under any circumstances. And yet, the SRK's campaign resulted in a large number of deaths and injuries to civilians. The Tribunal Prosecution alleged that the SRK, under General Gali ć's command deliberately killed and injured civilians in order to terrorize them. Terrorising civilians Terrorising civilians during armed conflict is specifically prohibited by Article 51 of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions of 1949. The former Yugoslavia ratified this protocol in 1978.
    [Show full text]
  • Tara-Drina National Park
    Feasibility study on establishing transboundary cooperation in the potential transboundary protected area: Tara-Drina National Park Prepared within the project “Sustaining Rural Communities and their Traditional Landscapes Through Strengthened Environmental Governance in Transboundary Protected Areas of the Dinaric Arc” ENVIRONMENT FOR PEOPLE A Western Balkans Environment & Development in the Dinaric Arc Cooperation Programme Author: Marijana Josipovic Photographs: Tara National Park archive Proofreading Linda Zanella Design and layout: Imre Sebestyen, jr. / UNITgraphics.com Available from: IUCN Programme Office for South-Eastern Europe Dr Ivana Ribara 91 11070 Belgrade, Serbia [email protected] Tel +381 11 2272 411 Fax +381 11 2272 531 www.iucn.org/publications Acknowledgments: A Special “thank you” goes to: Boris Erg, Veronika Ferdinandova (IUCN SEE), Dr. Deni Porej, (WWF MedPO), Ms. Aleksandra Mladenovic for commenting and editing the assessment text. Zbigniew Niewiadomski, consultant, UNEP Vienna ISCC for providing the study concept. Emira Mesanovic Mandic, WWF MedPO for coordinating the assessment process. 2 The designation of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, WWFMedPO and SNV concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, WWF MedPO and SNV. This publication has been made possible by funding from the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Belgrade, Serbia in collaboration with WWFMedPO and SNV Copyright: © 2011 International Union for Conservation of Nature Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder, provided the source is fully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina: Attitudes on Violent Extremism and Foreign Influence
    Bosnia and Herzegovina: Attitudes on Violent Extremism and Foreign Influence January 4 - February 3, 2017 Detailed Methodology • The survey was conducted by Ipsos in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) on behalf of the International Republican Institute’s Center for Insights and Survey Research, and was funded by the National Endowment for Democracy. • Data was collected between January 4 and February 3, 2017 through face-to-face interviews at the respondents’ homes using the CAPI method (computer assisted personal interviewing). • A total of 1,537 interviews were completed, with an overall margin of error of plus or minus 2.5 percent at the midrange of the 95 percent confidence level. A nationally-representative sample was assembled based on a multistage stratification proportionate to population sample distribution, through the random selection of households and respondents. • The sample is composed of citizens of BiH, aged 18 and older and was based on the 2013 Census; Vital Statistics 2012 and Ipsos estimations derived from the Central Election Commission database; Agency for Identification Documents; and the Registers and Data Exchange of Bosnia and Herzegovina database. • The sampling frame consisted of polling station territories (approximate size of census units) within strata defined by municipalities and type of settlements (urban and rural). Polling station territories enable the most reliable sample selection, due to the fact that these units represent the most comprehensive and up-to-date data available. • Households were selected according to the random route technique. Starting from a given address, interviewers selected the third house down the same side of the street or the next available house for an interview from the starting point.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina Prosecutor's Office Of
    BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA SARAJEVO Special Department for War Crimes Regional Team II Number: KT-RZ - 56/09 Sarajevo, 10 July 20098 COURT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA SARAJEVO - Preliminary Hearing Judge - Pursuant to Article 35 (2) item h) and Article 226 (1) of the CPC BiH. T hereby file the following: INDICTMENT Against: 1. ZORAN MARIe, aka Dole, son of Branko and mother Stoja, nee Dobretic, born on 15 April 1964 in the place of LjoljiCi, the mlmicipality of Jajce - Jezero, residing in Stara Pazova, Njegoseva no no. Street, Republic of Serbia, Serb by ethnicity, of Orthodox faith, citizen of BiH, Personal ID number: 1504964102084, brick layer by profession, married, father of three, served the military in Novi Sad in 1983, no prior convictions, no other criminal proceedings pending against him, ordered into custody pursuant to the Decision of the Court of BiH, No. X-KRN/05/96 of 08 July 2009. Because: During the state of war in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the armed conflict in the territory of Jajce municipality between the Army of Republika Srpska, on the one side, and the Army of BiH and HVO (Croat Defense Council) on the other, as a member of the Army of Republika Srpska, he acted in violation of the rules of Article 3, paragraph 1, subparagraphs a) and c) as read with Article 147 of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 12 August 1949, in as much as he, - On 10 September 1992, after the burial of a killed soldier of the Army of Republika Srpska, Rade Savic, as an organized group of armed people, which consisted of Jovo Jandric, Mirko Pekez son of Spiro, Simo Savic, Mirko Pekez son of Mile, Milorad Savic son of Ljupko, Zoran Marie, Slobodan Pekez.
    [Show full text]
  • Never Again: International Intervention in Bosnia and Herzegovina1
    Never again: 1 International intervention in Bosnia and Herzegovina July 2017 David Harland2 1 This study is one of a series commissioned as part of an ongoing UK Government Stabilisation Unit project relating to elite bargains and political deals. The project is exploring how national and international interventions have and have not been effective in fostering and sustaining political deals and elite bargains; and whether or not these political deals and elite bargains have helped reduce violence, increased local, regional and national stability and contributed to the strengthening of the relevant political settlement. This is a 'working paper' and the views contained within do not necessarily represent those of HMG. 2 Dr David Harland is Executive Director of the Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue. He served as a witness for the Prosecution at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia in the cases of The Prosecutor versus Slobodan Milošević, The Prosecutor versus Radovan Karadžić, The Prosecutor versus Ratko Mladić, and others. Executive summary The war in Bosnia and Herzegovina was the most violent of the conflicts which accompanied the break- up of Yugoslavia, and this paper explores international engagement with that war, including the process that led to the signing of the Dayton Peace Agreement. Sarajevo and Srebrenica remain iconic symbols of international failure to prevent and end violent conflict, even in a small country in Europe. They are seen as monuments to the "humiliation" of Europe and the UN and the
    [Show full text]
  • Reunifying Mostar: Opportunities for Progress
    REUNIFYING MOSTAR: OPPORTUNITIES FOR PROGRESS 19 April 2000 ICG Balkans Report N° 90 Sarajevo/Washington/Brussels, 19 April 2000 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................i I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................1 A. HDZ Obstruction...................................................................................................2 B. International Community Disarray..........................................................................3 II. BROKEN PROMISES: 1994-1999 .........................................................................4 A. The 1994 Geneva MOU .........................................................................................4 B. Towards Ethnic Apartheid......................................................................................4 C. EU Aid Reinforces Ethnic Apartheid ........................................................................6 D. Madrid and Dayton: defining the local administration of Mostar ................................7 E. Koschnick’s Decree and the Rome Agreement: EU Caves in to the HDZ.....................9 F. Mostar’s First Elections and the Myth of the Interim Statute ...................................12 G. The Liska Street Incident and Unified Police..........................................................18 H. No Progress, New Elections .................................................................................24 I. No progress,
    [Show full text]
  • The General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina
    The General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina Initialled in Dayton on 21 November 1995 and signed in Paris on 14 December 1995 The Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Republic of Croatia and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (the "Parties"), Recognizing the need for a comprehensive settlement to bring an end to the tragic conflict in the region, Desiring to contribute toward that end and to promote an enduring peace and stability, Affirming their commitment to the Agreed Basic Principles issued on September 8, 1995, the Further Agreed Basic Principles issued on September 26, 1995, and the cease-fire agreements of September 14 and October 5, 1995, Noting the agreement of August 29, 1995, which authorized the delegation of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia to sign, on behalf of the Republika Srpska, the parts of the peace plan concerning it, with the obligation to implement the agreement that is reached strictly and consequently, Have agreed as follows: Article I The Parties shall conduct their relations in accordance with the principles set forth in the United Nations Charter, as well as the Helsinki Final Act and other documents of the Or- ganization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. In particular, the Parties shall fully respect the sovereign equality of one another, shall settle disputes by peaceful means, and shall refrain from any action, by threat or use of force or otherwise, against the ter- ritorial integrity or political independence of Bosnia and Herzegovina or any other State. Article II The Parties welcome and endorse the arrangements that have been made concerning the military aspects of the peace settlement and aspects of regional stabilization, as set forth in the Agreements at Annex 1-A and Annex 1-B.
    [Show full text]
  • Peacebuilding in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Mostar and Brčko
    Research and Information Service Briefing Note Paper 75/14 16 June 2014 NIAR 264a-14 Michael Potter Peacebuilding in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Mostar and Brčko 1 Introduction This Briefing Note supplements the Briefing Paper Peace Building Initiatives: Examples Outside Northern Ireland, 4 April 2014, prepared for the Committee for the Office of the First Minister and deputy First Minister in the context of scrutinising community relations policy in Northern Ireland. The Note briefly summarises approaches to post-conflict peacebuilding in two towns in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Mostar in the South-West and Brčko in the North-East. The two towns have been compared due to the different approaches to peacebuilding within one country in the transition from conflict. 2 Context: A Brief Summary of the Post-Conflict Arrangements in Bosnia and Herzegovina During the process of the break-up of Yugoslavia, the war commenced in Bosnia and Herzegovina, one of the constituent republics in the federation, following a declaration of independence in 1992. In broad terms, the conflict was generally depicted as one between the three main ethnic communities in the republic: Serbs, Croats and Muslims (later to be referred to as ‘Bosniaks’), although the actual conflict processes were more Providing research and information services to the Northern Ireland Assembly 1 NIAR 264a-014 Briefing Note complex than this. The Washington Agreement in 1994 united Croat and Bosniak forces against the Serbs and the Dayton Agreement in 1995 resulted in a cessation of hostilities,
    [Show full text]
  • Seeking Justice for Wartime Crimes in Bosnia and Herzegovina
    SEEKING JUSTICE FOR WARTIME CRIMES IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA General Allegation regarding the application of statutes of limitations and court fees to victims 1 SUBMITTED BY TRIAL International Yale Law School’s Lowenstein International Human Rights Clinic SIGNED BY ANIMA Kotor Association for Missing Persons from Hadzici Association NasGlas Association of Detainees Bosanski Novi Association of Detainees Kozarac Association of Detainees of Hercegovina-Neretva Canton Association of Detainees of Zenica-Doboj Canton Association of Detainees Prijedor 92 Association of Prijedor Women “Izvor” Association of Victims and Witnesses of Genocide Center for Democracy and Transitional Justice Center for Woman’s Rights Center for Women War Victims ROSA Croatian Association of Detainees of Homeland War in Bosnia and Herzegovina Forum ZFD Foundation CURE Foundation United Women Banja Luka Municipal Association of Detainees Sanski Most Network for Building Peace Organization of Families of Martyred Soldiers and Missing Persons “Vrbanja” Kotor Varos Regional Association of Detainees Višegrad Regional Union of Detainees of Banja Luka Region Sarajevo Open Centre Society for Threatened Peoples Vasa prava Bosnia and Herzegovina Vivezene Tuzla Women in Black 2 “It was an additional humiliation for everyone, because they believed in a little bit of justice regardless of everything. I am angry at the country, at the prosecution offices, and at the courts. They did nothing for victims of torture, absolutely nothing.”1 – A former camp detainee whose civil claim was dismissed on the basis of statutes of limitations “We filed the claim hoping to receive at least some kind of satisfaction for the beatings, illegal detainment. However, the opposite happened ..
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment
    Public Company “REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA MOTORWAYS” 78000 Banja Luka 22 Veselina Masleše St, Bosnia and Herzegovina tel: 051 233-670, 233-680; fax: 051 233-700 NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY BANJA LUKA TO DOBOJ MOTORWAY: SECTION 1: BANJA LUKA TO PRNJAVOR January 2013 1 NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY BANJA LUKA TO DOBOJ MOTORWAY SECTION 1: BANJA LUKA TO PRNJAVOR January 2013 2 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................... 1 2.1 Banja Luka to Doboj Motorway ............................................................................................... 1 2.2 Section 1: Banja Luka to Prnjavor Motorway ......................................................................... 2 3 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................ 4 3.1 Rationale for Project ............................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Project Development and Planning History ............................................................................ 4 3.3 Route Selection and Consideration of Alternatives ................................................................ 6 4 SUMMARY OF LEGAL CONTEXT .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Congress Observed the Elections in Republika Srpska
    Press Release Communication Unit of the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities Ref:906a07 Tel: : +33 3 90 21 49 36 Fax : +33 3 88 41 27 51 [email protected] www.coe.int/congress Congress-Council of Europe Observation Mission for the 47 members Elections of the President of the Republic of Srpska (Bosnia and Herzegovina) Albania Andorra Sarajevo, 10.12.2007 - A delegation of the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of Armenia Austria the Council of Europe, on the official invitation by the BiH authorities, observed voting in Azerbaijan the elections for the President of the Republic of Srpska (Bosnia and Herzegovina) on Belgium Sunday 9 December. Bosnia and Herzegovina The delegation was deployed in many localities within the Republic of Srpska, and Bulgaria participated in preparatory meetings in Banja Luka, Prijedor, Sarajevo, Mostar and Croatia Nevesinje. On Election Day, Giorgi Masalkini - Congress Rapporteur - led a team which Cyprus observed elections in polling stations in Banja Luka and the surrounding area. A second Czech Republic team observed polling in the region east of Sarajevo (Pale, Sokolac, Rogatica). Denmark Estonia Finland The turn-out for these elections was notably low, despite the campaigning of some France candidates. Owen Masters, Head of the Mission, said that “the elections observed were Georgia generally in accordance with Council of Europe and international standards”. He added Germany that “it was encouraging to see the younger generation taking on electoral Greece responsibilities”. Early on Election Day, some voters had difficulties locating their specific Hungary voting station, but it should be noted that measures were soon put in place to address this Iceland problem.
    [Show full text]
  • The War in Croatia, 1991-1995
    7 Mile Bjelajac, team leader Ozren Žunec, team leader Mieczyslaw Boduszynski Igor Graovac Srdja Pavlović Raphael Draschtak Sally Kent Jason Vuić Rüdiger Malli This chapter stems in large part from the close collaboration and co-au- thorship of team co-leaders Mile Bjelajac and Ozren Žunec. They were supported by grants from the National Endowment for Democracy to de- fray the costs of research, writing, translation, and travel between Zagreb and Belgrade. The chapter also benefited from extensive comment and criticism from team members and project-wide reviews conducted in Feb- ruary-March 2004, November-December 2005, and October-November 2006. Several passages of prose were reconstructed in summer 2010 to address published criticism. THE WAR IN CROATIA, 1991-1995 ◆ Mile Bjelajac and Ozren Žunec ◆ Introductory Remarks Methodology and Sources Military organizations produce large quantities of documents covering all aspects of their activities, from strategic plans and decisions to reports on spending for small arms. When archives are open and documents accessible, it is relatively easy for military historians to reconstruct events in which the military partici- pated. When it comes to the military actions of the units in the field, abundant documentation provides for very detailed accounts that sometimes even tend to be overly microscopic. But there are also military organizations, wars, and indi- vidual episodes that are more difficult to reconstruct. Sometimes reliable data are lacking or are inaccessible, or there may be a controversy regarding the mean- ing of events that no document can solve. Complicated political factors and the simple but basic shortcomings of human nature also provide challenges for any careful reconstruction.
    [Show full text]