DOCSLIB.ORG

Zakon-O-Univerzitetu.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Zakon-O-Univerzitetu.Pdf <Title> Zakon o univerzitetu – prednacrt </Title> <META name="description" content=" "> <META name="keywords" content=" Law on universities , draft , RPS , SRB , T04 "> <!--NOSEARCHSTART--> REPUBLIKA SRPSKA MINISTARSTVO PROSVJETE BANJA LUKA Prednacrt ZAKON O UNIVERZITETU Banja Luka, maj 2001. godine ZAKON O UNIVERZITETU I - OSNOVNE ODREDBE Član 1. Univerzitet je autonomna, naučna, obrazovna, odnosno umjetnička visokoškolska ustanova u čijem sasatavu su fakulteti i akademije umjetnosti (u daljem tekstu: visokoškolske ustanove) čiji je osnivač Republika Srpska (u daljem tekstu: Republika). U sastavu univerziteta mogu biti i naučni instituti, univerzitetske biblioteke i druge organizacije čija je djelatnost u skladu sa djelatnošću univerziteta. Organizacija univerziteta i odnosi između visokoškolskih ustanova i drugih organizacija u sastavu univerziteta (u daljem tekstu: članice univerziteta) uređuju se statutom univerziteta. Član 2. Univerzitetu i njegovim članicama zajamčena je sloboda naučnog, obrazovnog i umjetničkog rada i stvaralaštva. Na univerzitetu i njegovim članicama nije dozvoljeno političko i stranačko organizovanje i djelovanje. Univerzitet i njegove članice autonomni su u obavljanju svoje djelatnosti. Prostor univerziteta i njegovih članica je nepovrediv. Član 3. Univerzitet organizuje i obavlja djelatnost u oblasti naučnog, obrazovnog, odnosno umjetničkog rada u skladu sa ovim zakonom i statutom. Član 4. Visokoškolska ustanova je obrazovno-naučna, odnosno obrazovno-umjetnička ustanova koja u okviru svoje matične djelatnosti organizuje osnovne studije za sticanje I (prvog) stepena visoke stručne spreme, visoke stručne spreme i postdiplomske studije za sticanje stručnog stepena specijaliste, naučnog, odnosno umjetničkog stepena magistra nauka i naučnog stepena doktora nauka, kao i oblike stručnog obrazovanja i usavršavanja. Visokoškolska ustanova organizuje naučna istraživanja koja su u funkciji razvoja nauke i tehnologije. Član 5. 2 Osim poslova iz prethodnog člana univerzitet organizuje i obavlja: - studije iz iterdisciplinarnih i multidisciplinarnih naučnih, odnosno umjetničkih oblasti; - međunarodnu naučno-obrazovnu i naučnoistraživačku saradnju; - investiciono održavanje objekta i vodi računa da se univerzitetski objekti racionalno koriste za nastavu i naučnoistraživački rad; - usklađuje rad članica univerziteta; - stručno i naučno usavršavanje nastavno-istraživačkog podmlatka; - usklađivanje nastavnih planova i programa sa savremenim naučnim dostignućima i metodama istraživanja; - i druge poslove u skladu sa zakonom i statutom univerziteta. Član 6. Visokoškolska ustanova obavlja svoju djelatnost u sjedištu. Visokoškolska ustanova može obavljati djelatnosti na području Republike, a u inostranstvu uz saglasnost Vlade Republike. Član 7. Načelo autonomije obezbjeđuje: - samostalno utvrđivanje organizacije rada statutom u skladu sa zakonom; - slobodu naučnoistraživačkog, obrazovnog i umjetničkog rada i stvaralaštva; - izbor nastavnika, saradnika i naučnoistraživačkih radnika u skladu sa utvrđenim mjerilima u statutu; - donošenje i realizaciju nastavnih planova i programa i njihovo permanentno usklađivanje sa naučnim dostignućima; - dodjeljivanje akademskih, naučnih i počasnih zvanja zaslužnim naučnim radnicima; - slobodno odlučivanje o oblicima saradnje sa drugim organizacijama i ustanovama; - upravljanje imovinom u skladu sa statutom i zakonom; - pravo objavljivanja stručnih i naučnih radova i knjiga u skladu sa zakonom; - slobodu istraživanja, umjetničke kreacije i transfera znanja; - autonomiju u borbi za kvalitet studija. Član 8. Djelatnost i organizacija visokoškolske ustanove utvrđuje se statutom u skladu sa zakonom. Saglasnost na statut visokoškolske ustanove daje Ministarstvo prosvjete Republike. Član 9. 3 Visokoškolske ustanove stiču finansijska sredstva na osnovu ugovora sa osnivačem, odnosno korisnikom drugih usluga po osnovu troškova školovanja (studija) i iz drugih izvora,. Finansijska sredstva, za obrazovanje studenata prve godine studija u okviru broja koji utvrdi Vlada, kao i prvi put upisanih studenata ostalih godina studija na visokoškolskim ustanovama čiji je osnivač Republika, obezbjeđuju se u buxetu Republike. Visina finansijskih sredstava iz prethodnog stava utvrđuje se ugovorom na osnovu Pravilnika o normativima i standardima. Studenti koji se upišu u prvu godinu studija preko broja koji se finansira iz buxeta, strani studenti i studenti koji obnavljaju godinu studija, plaćaju troškove školovanja (studija). Odluku o visini troškova studija iz prethodnog stava, uslovima i načinu plaćanja donosi senat univerziteta. Član 10. Nepokretnosti i druga sredstva koja obezbjedi Republika kao osnivač za osnivanje i rad visokoškolskih ustanova svojina su univerziteta. Nepokretnosti iz prethodnog stava ne mogu se otuđivati bez saglasnosti osnivača. Nepokretnosti i druga sredstva, zadužbine, fondacije ili fond koje koriste univerzitet i visokoškolska ustanova mogu se koristiti isključivo u svrhe koje je odredio donator, u skladu sa zakonom. Nepokretnosti i druga imovina koju univerzitet, odnosno visokoškolska ustanova stekne obavljanjem svoje djelatnosti, kao i na osnovu zavještanja i poklona, svojina su univerziteta, odnosno visokoškolske ustanove koja je tu imovinu stekla. Član 11. Na visokoškolskoj ustanovi nastava se izvodi na srpskom jeziku. Na osnovu pristanka studenata i saglasnosti Ministarstva prosvjete nastava se može izvoditi i na nekom od sljedećih svjetskih jezika: engleski, francuski, ruski i njemački jezik. Član 12. Upravni nadzor nad primjenom odredaba zakona obavlja Ministarstvo prosvjete i univerzitet. II – OSNIVANJE I UKIDANJE Član 13. 4 Univerzitet i visokoškolsku ustanovu može osnovati Republika, domaće pravno ili fizičko lice, kao i strano pravno ili fizičko lice zajedno sa domaćom visokoškolskom ustanovom, u skladu sa ovim zakonom. Predlagač podnosi zahtjev za osnivanje visokoškolske ustanove Vladi Republike sa elaboratom koji sadrži bitne elemente za osnivanje visokoškolske ustanove. Član 14. Uz zahtjev za osnivanje visokoškolske ustanove, predlagač prilaže i Elaborat o opravdanosti osnivanja univerziteta odnosno visokoškolske ustanove koji sadrži: - društveno-ekonomsku opravdanost osnivanja; - prijedlog nastavnog plana, kadar, prostor i oprema; - način finansiranja; - opis ostalih relevantnih činilaca za rad visokoškolske ustanove. Član 15. Ako Vlada usvoji zahtjev za osnivanje visokoškolske ustanove, prijedlog dostavlja Skupštini Republike. Kada Skupština donese pozitivu odluku o formiranju, Vlada će formirati matičarsku komisiju i utvrditi rok za podnošenje izvještaja. Matičarska komisija: razrađuje nastavni plan i program, opšti akt o pravilima studija, raspisuje konkurs i vrši izbor nastavnika i saradnika za sve nastavne predmete prve godine studija i predlaže broj studenata za upis u prvu godinu studija. Matičarska komisija podnosi izvještaj Ministarstvu prosvjete u Vladi Republike najkasnije tri mjeseca prije početka školske godine. Član 16. Skupština Republike daje saglasnost za osnivanje privatnih visokoškolskih ustanova. Ministarstvo prosvjete utvrđuje da li su ispunjeni uslovi za početak rada visokoškolske ustanove. Prethodne odredbe ovog člana primjenjuju se i kod osnivanja novog odsjeka, smjera ili prvog stepena. Bliže propise o osnivanju i radu matičarske komisije donosi ministar prosvjete. Član 17. Visokoškolska ustanova, odnosno odsjek može da obavlja djelatnost ako: 1. ispunjava opšte i posebne uslove po standardima i noramtivima visokog obrazovanja (ima odgovarajući prostor i opremu); 5 2. ima izabrane nastavnike za sve nastavne predmete od kojih je najmanje jedna polovina u stalnom radnom odnosu na univerzitetu sa punim radnim vremenom ili sa najmanje jednom polovinom radnog vremena. 3. dobije saglasnost Ministarstva prosvjete. Član 18. Privatni fakulteti i univerziteti osnivaju se po postupku po kome se osnivaju državni fakulteti i univerziteti. Član 19. Vlada Republike donosi propise kojim se bliže određuju uslovi osnivanja i prestanak rada visokoškolskih ustanova, odsjeka i smjerova. Član 20. Studenti imaju pravo da završe započete studije u slučaju da visokoškolska ustanova prestaje sa radom. Po prestanku sa radom, visokoškolska ustanova ne može upisivati nove studente, ali nastavlja sa svojom djelatnošću dvije godine po prestanku rada. Član 21. Visokoškolska ustanova može vršiti statusne promjene uz saglasnost osnivača i ministra prosvjete. III – UPRAVLJANJE I RUKOVO\ENJE 1. Organi univerziteta Član 22. Organi univerziteta su: rektor, upravni odbor i senat. Član 23. Rektor rukovodi radom univerziteta. Rektora imenuje i razrješava upravni odbor na prijedlog senata tajnim glasanjem. Senat utvrđuje prijedlog na osnovu prethodnih prijedloga fakulteta koji su u sastavu Vijeća univerziteta. 6 Član 24. Mandat rektora traje četiri godine i može biti samo jednom obnovljen. Član 25. Za rektora može biti imenovan redovni profesor koji je na visokoškolskoj ustanovi u stalnom radnom odnosu sa punim radnim vremenom. Član 26. Rektor univerziteta: 1. predstavlja i zastupa univerzitet; 2. organizuje, usklađuje i rukovodi radom i poslovanjem univerziteta; 3. predlaže godišnji program rada i program razvoja; 4. stara se o izvršavanju odluka organa univerziteta; 5. potpisuje diplome koje izdaje univerzitet; 6. obavlja promociju doktora nauka i počasnog doktora nauka; 7. obavlja i druge poslove u skladu sa statutom i zakonom. Član 27. Rektor može prenijeti dio svojih ovlašćenja na prorektore ili generalnog sekretara univerziteta. Rektor je odgovoran za svoj rad upravnom
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Siege of Sarajevo Endangered Civilians
    BALKAN January 8, 2004 Page 6 VIEW FROM THE HAGUE SIEGE OF SARAJEVO ENDANGERED CIVILIANS On 5 December this year, the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia sentenced General Stanislav Gali ć to 20 years in prison for spreading terror among the civilian population during the siege of Sarajevo. The city of Sarajevo was under siege for about three and a half years. For almost two years of that time, from September 1992 to August 1994, General Gali ć was the commander of a branch of the Army of Republika Srpska (VRS), called the Sarajevo Romanija Corps, or SRK, which had virtually encircled Sarajevo. Parts of the city were controlled by the Army of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Prosecution alleged that the SRK under General Gali ć's command conducted a campaign of sniping and shelling attacks on civilians in Sarajevo. Under international humanitarian law war as such is not considered unlawful. However, certain principles of warfare apply that military commanders must respect. One such principle obliges military commanders to distinguish between military objectives, on the one hand, and civilians, on the other, and not to attack civilians under any circumstances. And yet, the SRK's campaign resulted in a large number of deaths and injuries to civilians. The Tribunal Prosecution alleged that the SRK, under General Gali ć's command deliberately killed and injured civilians in order to terrorize them. Terrorising civilians Terrorising civilians during armed conflict is specifically prohibited by Article 51 of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions of 1949. The former Yugoslavia ratified this protocol in 1978.
    [Show full text]
  • Tara-Drina National Park
    Feasibility study on establishing transboundary cooperation in the potential transboundary protected area: Tara-Drina National Park Prepared within the project “Sustaining Rural Communities and their Traditional Landscapes Through Strengthened Environmental Governance in Transboundary Protected Areas of the Dinaric Arc” ENVIRONMENT FOR PEOPLE A Western Balkans Environment & Development in the Dinaric Arc Cooperation Programme Author: Marijana Josipovic Photographs: Tara National Park archive Proofreading Linda Zanella Design and layout: Imre Sebestyen, jr. / UNITgraphics.com Available from: IUCN Programme Office for South-Eastern Europe Dr Ivana Ribara 91 11070 Belgrade, Serbia [email protected] Tel +381 11 2272 411 Fax +381 11 2272 531 www.iucn.org/publications Acknowledgments: A Special “thank you” goes to: Boris Erg, Veronika Ferdinandova (IUCN SEE), Dr. Deni Porej, (WWF MedPO), Ms. Aleksandra Mladenovic for commenting and editing the assessment text. Zbigniew Niewiadomski, consultant, UNEP Vienna ISCC for providing the study concept. Emira Mesanovic Mandic, WWF MedPO for coordinating the assessment process. 2 The designation of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, WWFMedPO and SNV concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, WWF MedPO and SNV. This publication has been made possible by funding from the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Belgrade, Serbia in collaboration with WWFMedPO and SNV Copyright: © 2011 International Union for Conservation of Nature Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder, provided the source is fully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina: Attitudes on Violent Extremism and Foreign Influence
    Bosnia and Herzegovina: Attitudes on Violent Extremism and Foreign Influence January 4 - February 3, 2017 Detailed Methodology • The survey was conducted by Ipsos in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) on behalf of the International Republican Institute’s Center for Insights and Survey Research, and was funded by the National Endowment for Democracy. • Data was collected between January 4 and February 3, 2017 through face-to-face interviews at the respondents’ homes using the CAPI method (computer assisted personal interviewing). • A total of 1,537 interviews were completed, with an overall margin of error of plus or minus 2.5 percent at the midrange of the 95 percent confidence level. A nationally-representative sample was assembled based on a multistage stratification proportionate to population sample distribution, through the random selection of households and respondents. • The sample is composed of citizens of BiH, aged 18 and older and was based on the 2013 Census; Vital Statistics 2012 and Ipsos estimations derived from the Central Election Commission database; Agency for Identification Documents; and the Registers and Data Exchange of Bosnia and Herzegovina database. • The sampling frame consisted of polling station territories (approximate size of census units) within strata defined by municipalities and type of settlements (urban and rural). Polling station territories enable the most reliable sample selection, due to the fact that these units represent the most comprehensive and up-to-date data available. • Households were selected according to the random route technique. Starting from a given address, interviewers selected the third house down the same side of the street or the next available house for an interview from the starting point.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina Prosecutor's Office Of
    BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA SARAJEVO Special Department for War Crimes Regional Team II Number: KT-RZ - 56/09 Sarajevo, 10 July 20098 COURT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA SARAJEVO - Preliminary Hearing Judge - Pursuant to Article 35 (2) item h) and Article 226 (1) of the CPC BiH. T hereby file the following: INDICTMENT Against: 1. ZORAN MARIe, aka Dole, son of Branko and mother Stoja, nee Dobretic, born on 15 April 1964 in the place of LjoljiCi, the mlmicipality of Jajce - Jezero, residing in Stara Pazova, Njegoseva no no. Street, Republic of Serbia, Serb by ethnicity, of Orthodox faith, citizen of BiH, Personal ID number: 1504964102084, brick layer by profession, married, father of three, served the military in Novi Sad in 1983, no prior convictions, no other criminal proceedings pending against him, ordered into custody pursuant to the Decision of the Court of BiH, No. X-KRN/05/96 of 08 July 2009. Because: During the state of war in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the armed conflict in the territory of Jajce municipality between the Army of Republika Srpska, on the one side, and the Army of BiH and HVO (Croat Defense Council) on the other, as a member of the Army of Republika Srpska, he acted in violation of the rules of Article 3, paragraph 1, subparagraphs a) and c) as read with Article 147 of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 12 August 1949, in as much as he, - On 10 September 1992, after the burial of a killed soldier of the Army of Republika Srpska, Rade Savic, as an organized group of armed people, which consisted of Jovo Jandric, Mirko Pekez son of Spiro, Simo Savic, Mirko Pekez son of Mile, Milorad Savic son of Ljupko, Zoran Marie, Slobodan Pekez.
    [Show full text]
  • The Criminal Code of Republika Srpska Published in the “Official Gazette of Republika Srpska”, 49/03, 108/04, 37/06, 70/06, 73/10, 1/12, 67/13
    Emerika Bluma 1, 71000 Sarajevo Tel. 28 35 00 Fax. 28 35 01 Department for Legal Affairs CRIMINAL CODE OF REPUBLIKA SRPSKA “Official Gazette of Republika Srpska”, 64/17 NOTE: On the day of entering into force of this Law, shall cease to be valid the Criminal Code of Republika Srpska published in the “Official Gazette of Republika Srpska”, 49/03, 108/04, 37/06, 70/06, 73/10, 1/12, 67/13. CRIMINAL CODE OF REPUBLIKA SRPSKA GENERAL PART CHAPTER ONE GENERAL PROVISIONS Basis and Function of the Criminal Legislation of the Republika Srpska Article 1 (1) Criminal law provisions contained in this Code shall be based on the Constitution of the Republika Srpska and the generally acknowledged principles and norms of international law. (2) The basic function of the criminal legislation of the Republika Srpska shall be to protect the fundamental human rights and freedoms and other fundamental individual and general values established by the Republika Srpska Constitution and international law. (3) This protection shall be implemented by defining the particular criminal offences, by specifying punishments and other criminal sanctions for the perpetration of these criminal offenses and by pronouncing the sentences against the offenders in the legally prescribed proceedings. Principle of Legality Article 2 (1) Criminal offences and criminal sanctions shall be prescribed only by law. (2) No punishment or other criminal sanction may be pronounced on any person for an act which, prior to being perpetrated, has not been defined as a criminal offence by law, and no punishment or another criminal sanction that has not been prescribed by such law cannot be pronounced against the person.
    [Show full text]
  • Never Again: International Intervention in Bosnia and Herzegovina1
    Never again: 1 International intervention in Bosnia and Herzegovina July 2017 David Harland2 1 This study is one of a series commissioned as part of an ongoing UK Government Stabilisation Unit project relating to elite bargains and political deals. The project is exploring how national and international interventions have and have not been effective in fostering and sustaining political deals and elite bargains; and whether or not these political deals and elite bargains have helped reduce violence, increased local, regional and national stability and contributed to the strengthening of the relevant political settlement. This is a 'working paper' and the views contained within do not necessarily represent those of HMG. 2 Dr David Harland is Executive Director of the Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue. He served as a witness for the Prosecution at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia in the cases of The Prosecutor versus Slobodan Milošević, The Prosecutor versus Radovan Karadžić, The Prosecutor versus Ratko Mladić, and others. Executive summary The war in Bosnia and Herzegovina was the most violent of the conflicts which accompanied the break- up of Yugoslavia, and this paper explores international engagement with that war, including the process that led to the signing of the Dayton Peace Agreement. Sarajevo and Srebrenica remain iconic symbols of international failure to prevent and end violent conflict, even in a small country in Europe. They are seen as monuments to the "humiliation" of Europe and the UN and the
    [Show full text]
  • Reunifying Mostar: Opportunities for Progress
    REUNIFYING MOSTAR: OPPORTUNITIES FOR PROGRESS 19 April 2000 ICG Balkans Report N° 90 Sarajevo/Washington/Brussels, 19 April 2000 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................i I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................1 A. HDZ Obstruction...................................................................................................2 B. International Community Disarray..........................................................................3 II. BROKEN PROMISES: 1994-1999 .........................................................................4 A. The 1994 Geneva MOU .........................................................................................4 B. Towards Ethnic Apartheid......................................................................................4 C. EU Aid Reinforces Ethnic Apartheid ........................................................................6 D. Madrid and Dayton: defining the local administration of Mostar ................................7 E. Koschnick’s Decree and the Rome Agreement: EU Caves in to the HDZ.....................9 F. Mostar’s First Elections and the Myth of the Interim Statute ...................................12 G. The Liska Street Incident and Unified Police..........................................................18 H. No Progress, New Elections .................................................................................24 I. No progress,
    [Show full text]
  • The General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina
    The General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina Initialled in Dayton on 21 November 1995 and signed in Paris on 14 December 1995 The Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Republic of Croatia and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (the "Parties"), Recognizing the need for a comprehensive settlement to bring an end to the tragic conflict in the region, Desiring to contribute toward that end and to promote an enduring peace and stability, Affirming their commitment to the Agreed Basic Principles issued on September 8, 1995, the Further Agreed Basic Principles issued on September 26, 1995, and the cease-fire agreements of September 14 and October 5, 1995, Noting the agreement of August 29, 1995, which authorized the delegation of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia to sign, on behalf of the Republika Srpska, the parts of the peace plan concerning it, with the obligation to implement the agreement that is reached strictly and consequently, Have agreed as follows: Article I The Parties shall conduct their relations in accordance with the principles set forth in the United Nations Charter, as well as the Helsinki Final Act and other documents of the Or- ganization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. In particular, the Parties shall fully respect the sovereign equality of one another, shall settle disputes by peaceful means, and shall refrain from any action, by threat or use of force or otherwise, against the ter- ritorial integrity or political independence of Bosnia and Herzegovina or any other State. Article II The Parties welcome and endorse the arrangements that have been made concerning the military aspects of the peace settlement and aspects of regional stabilization, as set forth in the Agreements at Annex 1-A and Annex 1-B.
    [Show full text]
  • Peacebuilding in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Mostar and Brčko
    Research and Information Service Briefing Note Paper 75/14 16 June 2014 NIAR 264a-14 Michael Potter Peacebuilding in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Mostar and Brčko 1 Introduction This Briefing Note supplements the Briefing Paper Peace Building Initiatives: Examples Outside Northern Ireland, 4 April 2014, prepared for the Committee for the Office of the First Minister and deputy First Minister in the context of scrutinising community relations policy in Northern Ireland. The Note briefly summarises approaches to post-conflict peacebuilding in two towns in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Mostar in the South-West and Brčko in the North-East. The two towns have been compared due to the different approaches to peacebuilding within one country in the transition from conflict. 2 Context: A Brief Summary of the Post-Conflict Arrangements in Bosnia and Herzegovina During the process of the break-up of Yugoslavia, the war commenced in Bosnia and Herzegovina, one of the constituent republics in the federation, following a declaration of independence in 1992. In broad terms, the conflict was generally depicted as one between the three main ethnic communities in the republic: Serbs, Croats and Muslims (later to be referred to as ‘Bosniaks’), although the actual conflict processes were more Providing research and information services to the Northern Ireland Assembly 1 NIAR 264a-014 Briefing Note complex than this. The Washington Agreement in 1994 united Croat and Bosniak forces against the Serbs and the Dayton Agreement in 1995 resulted in a cessation of hostilities,
    [Show full text]
  • Seeking Justice for Wartime Crimes in Bosnia and Herzegovina
    SEEKING JUSTICE FOR WARTIME CRIMES IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA General Allegation regarding the application of statutes of limitations and court fees to victims 1 SUBMITTED BY TRIAL International Yale Law School’s Lowenstein International Human Rights Clinic SIGNED BY ANIMA Kotor Association for Missing Persons from Hadzici Association NasGlas Association of Detainees Bosanski Novi Association of Detainees Kozarac Association of Detainees of Hercegovina-Neretva Canton Association of Detainees of Zenica-Doboj Canton Association of Detainees Prijedor 92 Association of Prijedor Women “Izvor” Association of Victims and Witnesses of Genocide Center for Democracy and Transitional Justice Center for Woman’s Rights Center for Women War Victims ROSA Croatian Association of Detainees of Homeland War in Bosnia and Herzegovina Forum ZFD Foundation CURE Foundation United Women Banja Luka Municipal Association of Detainees Sanski Most Network for Building Peace Organization of Families of Martyred Soldiers and Missing Persons “Vrbanja” Kotor Varos Regional Association of Detainees Višegrad Regional Union of Detainees of Banja Luka Region Sarajevo Open Centre Society for Threatened Peoples Vasa prava Bosnia and Herzegovina Vivezene Tuzla Women in Black 2 “It was an additional humiliation for everyone, because they believed in a little bit of justice regardless of everything. I am angry at the country, at the prosecution offices, and at the courts. They did nothing for victims of torture, absolutely nothing.”1 – A former camp detainee whose civil claim was dismissed on the basis of statutes of limitations “We filed the claim hoping to receive at least some kind of satisfaction for the beatings, illegal detainment. However, the opposite happened ..
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment
    Public Company “REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA MOTORWAYS” 78000 Banja Luka 22 Veselina Masleše St, Bosnia and Herzegovina tel: 051 233-670, 233-680; fax: 051 233-700 NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY BANJA LUKA TO DOBOJ MOTORWAY: SECTION 1: BANJA LUKA TO PRNJAVOR January 2013 1 NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY BANJA LUKA TO DOBOJ MOTORWAY SECTION 1: BANJA LUKA TO PRNJAVOR January 2013 2 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................... 1 2.1 Banja Luka to Doboj Motorway ............................................................................................... 1 2.2 Section 1: Banja Luka to Prnjavor Motorway ......................................................................... 2 3 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................ 4 3.1 Rationale for Project ............................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Project Development and Planning History ............................................................................ 4 3.3 Route Selection and Consideration of Alternatives ................................................................ 6 4 SUMMARY OF LEGAL CONTEXT .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Congress Observed the Elections in Republika Srpska
    Press Release Communication Unit of the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities Ref:906a07 Tel: : +33 3 90 21 49 36 Fax : +33 3 88 41 27 51 [email protected] www.coe.int/congress Congress-Council of Europe Observation Mission for the 47 members Elections of the President of the Republic of Srpska (Bosnia and Herzegovina) Albania Andorra Sarajevo, 10.12.2007 - A delegation of the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of Armenia Austria the Council of Europe, on the official invitation by the BiH authorities, observed voting in Azerbaijan the elections for the President of the Republic of Srpska (Bosnia and Herzegovina) on Belgium Sunday 9 December. Bosnia and Herzegovina The delegation was deployed in many localities within the Republic of Srpska, and Bulgaria participated in preparatory meetings in Banja Luka, Prijedor, Sarajevo, Mostar and Croatia Nevesinje. On Election Day, Giorgi Masalkini - Congress Rapporteur - led a team which Cyprus observed elections in polling stations in Banja Luka and the surrounding area. A second Czech Republic team observed polling in the region east of Sarajevo (Pale, Sokolac, Rogatica). Denmark Estonia Finland The turn-out for these elections was notably low, despite the campaigning of some France candidates. Owen Masters, Head of the Mission, said that “the elections observed were Georgia generally in accordance with Council of Europe and international standards”. He added Germany that “it was encouraging to see the younger generation taking on electoral Greece responsibilities”. Early on Election Day, some voters had difficulties locating their specific Hungary voting station, but it should be noted that measures were soon put in place to address this Iceland problem.
    [Show full text]