DOCSLIB.ORG

"ECHO and NARCISSUS" in Greek Mythology Echo Was a Wood Nymph Who Loved a Youth by the Name of Narcissus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EDAY 6: READ THE FOLLOWING TWO MYTHS AND ANSWER THE CER THAT FOLLOWS. "ECHO AND NARCISSUS" In Greek mythology Echo was a wood nymph who loved a youth by the name of Narcissus. He was a beautiful creature loved by many but Narcissus loved no one. He enjoyed attention, praise and envy. In Narcissus' eyes nobody matched him and as such he considered none were worthy of him. Echo's passion for Narcissus was equaled only by her passion for talking as she always had to have the last word. One day she enabled the escape of the goddess Juno's adulterous husband by engaging Juno in conversation. On finding out Echo's treachery Juno cursed Echo by removing her voice with the exception that she could only speak that which was spoken to her. Echo often waited in the woods to see Narcissus hoping for a chance to be noticed. One day as she lingered in the bushes he heard her footsteps and called out “Who's here?” Echo replied “Here!” Narcissus called again "Come", Echo replied "Come!". Narcissus called once more “Why do you shun me?... Let us join one another.” Echo was overjoyed that Narcissus had asked her to join him. She longed to tell him who she was and of all the love she had for him in her heart but she could not speak. She ran towards him and threw herself upon him. Narcissus became angry “Hands off! I would rather die than you should have me!” and threw Echo to the ground. Echo left the woods a ruin, her heart broken. Ashamed she ran away to live in the mountains yearning for a love that would never be returned. The grief killed her. Her body became one with the mountain stone. All that remained was her voice which replied in kind when others spoke. Narcissus continued to attract many nymphs all of whom he briefly entertained before scorning and refusing them. The gods grew tired of his behaviour and cursed Narcissus. They wanted him to know what it felt like to love and never be loved. They made it so there was only one whom he would love, someone who was not real and could never love him back. One day whilst out enjoying the sunshine Narcissus came upon a pool of water. As he gazed into it he caught a glimpse of what he thought was a beautiful water spirit. He did not recognize his own reflection and was immediately enamoured. Narcissus bent down his head to kiss the vision. As he did so the reflection mimicked his actions. Taking this as a sign of reciprocation Narcissus reached into the pool to draw the water spirit to him. The water displaced and the vision was gone. He panicked, where had his love gone? When the water became calm the water spirit returned. “Why, beautiful being, do you shun me? Surely my face is not one to repel you. The nymphs love me, and you yourself look not indifferent upon me. When I stretch forth my arms you do the same; and you smile upon me and answer my beckonings with the like.” Again he reached out and again his love disappeared. Frightened to touch the water Narcissus lay still by the pool gazing in to the eyes of his vision. He cried in frustration. As he did so Echo also cried. He did not move, he did not eat or drink, he only suffered. As he pined he became gaunt loosing his beauty. The nymphs that loved him pleaded with him to come away from the pool. As they did so Echo also pleaded with him. He was transfixed; he wanted to stay there forever. Narcissus like Echo died with grief. His body disappeared and where his body once lay a flower grew in it's place. The nymphs mourned his death and as they mourned Echo also mourned. The Myth of Prometheus – The Thief of Fire The myth of Prometheus and fire makes us contemplate on a serious question: If Prometheus hadn’t stolen the fire from Zeus, what the mankind would have done? But the mischievous Titan in the Greek Mythology stole it and while he was celebrated by the mortals he was cruelly punished by the God of all Gods. Considering this Prometheus’s deed as one of the biggest crimes ever – although it was not the first time that Prometheus tricked Zeus – the Mighty God had Prometheus chained to the rock where the eagle was to eat his eternally replenished liver every day. What a dispute between mortals and immortals! And what a great story for artistic expressions and theatrical plays! And most importantly, that punishment was not the end of the tale of Prometheus and Zeus. But let’s start from the beginning. Prometheus and Zeus Prometheus was one of the Titans, who at some point were sent to Tartarus by the enraged Zeus who didn’t accept the Titans’s fighting against him in the famous Battle of the Titans – Titanomachy. However Prometheus was not directly involved in the war, so Zeus saved him from Tartarus and gave him a mission – to form a man from water and earth. Prometheus accomplished the task, but while working on his creation, he grew fond of men. He didn’t care much ever about the Gods and their hierarchy, and however friendly treated by them, he was much more comfortable being around the immortals. In any case, Zeus’s idea was not to have men with any unusual power. But Prometheus was thinking the other way, and decided to steal one of the powers Zeus was particularly sensitive about – fire. Prometheus steals the Fire Thinking about stealing fire was easy, but it finally proved a bit more complicated. Prometheus, known for his wit and intelligence, had an immediate plan – to trick the goddesses throwing them a golden pear (in some version – apple) into the courtyard with a message: “For the most beautiful goddess of all”. It worked as he planned – the goddesses started a fight over the fruit while gods were completely enjoying the scene. All of them were distracted and Prometheus didn’t have a hard time stealing the fire from Hephaestus’s workshop. Hephaestus was, among other stuff, the Greek god of fire. Prometheus happily left the Gods’ playground and took the fire with him either in a hollowed pumpkin or hollowed reed (depending on the interpretation) and brought it to Earth and gave it to humans. Oh, how Zeus was mad. After so many times being defied by Prometheus, Zeus decided that it was enough. Nevertheless, he made Hephaestus himself to chain Prometheus on Mount Caucasus where the eagle would eat his liver forever. But, time passed and Zeus offered at one occasion to free Prometheus in exchange for a revelation of the prophecy that predicted the dethroning of Zeus. Prometheus refused. But much later Zeus’s son Hercules, on his journey to fulfill the Twelve Labors, passed by the Mount Caucasus, saw Prometheus and decided to kill the eagle and free the chained Titan. Zeus was very angry initially but eventually agreed to grant Prometheus his freedom. Well, some sort of freedom since Zeus wanted Prometheus to carry a reminder of his punishment forever – he ordered Prometheus to make a steel ring from the chains he was in, and wear that ring from then on. Since then, the mankind started creating rings in order to celebrate Prometheus and commemorate his help. Name________________________________ Period ____ Date___________________________ CER Identify how the two myths are similar. Include two pieces of evidence from the texts and reasoning. ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Archaeoacoustics: a Key Role of Echoes at Utah Rock Art Sites
    Steven J. Waller ARCHAEOACOUSTICS: A KEY ROLE OF ECHOES AT UTAH ROCK ART SITES Archaeoacoustics is an emerging field of study emanate from rock surfaces where beings are investigating sound in relation to the past. The depicted, as if the images are speaking. Myths intent of this paper is to convey appreciation for attribute echoes to sheep, humans, lizards, the echoes at Utah rock art sites, by recognizing snakes and other figures that are major rock art the importance of their influence both on the themes. Echo-rich Fremont Indian State Park ancient artists, and on modern scientific studies. even has a panel that has been interpreted as The title of this paper is thus intentionally showing the mythological Echo Twin. The worded such that it could be understood in two study, appreciation, and preservation of rock art different but interrelated ways. One, the study acoustics in Utah are encouraged. of sound indicates that echoes were an im- portant factor relative to rock art in Utah. Two, INITIAL STUDIES OUTSIDE UTAH the echoes found to be associated with Utah rock art sites have been particularly helpful in A conceptual connection between sound and developing theories relating sound to past cul- rock art originally occurred to me when visiting tural activities and ideologies. This paper de- European Palaeolithic caves in 1987. A fortui- scribes in a roughly chronological order the tous shout at the mouth of a cave resulted in a events and studies that have led to Utah featur- startling echo. I immediately remembered the ing prominently in the development of archaeo- Greek myth in which echoes were attributed to acoustics.
    [Show full text]
  • MYTHS Echo and Narcissus Greco/Roman the Greeks
    MYTHS Echo and Narcissus Greco/Roman The Greeks (and Romans) were among the early monogamous societies. The men, however, seemed to revel in stories of Zeus’ (Jupiter’s) adulterous escapades with goddesses as well as humans, and enjoyed tales of the jealousies of his wife, Hera (Juno), the goddess of marriage and the family. For the full introduction to this story and for other stories, see The Allyn & Bacon Anthology of Traditional Literature edited by Judith V. Lechner. Allyn & Bacon/Longman, 2003. From: Outline of Mythology: The Age of Fable, The Age of Chivalry, Legends of Charlemagne by Thomas Bulfinch. New York: Review of Reviews Company, 1913. pp. 101-103. Echo was a beautiful nymph, fond of the woods and hills, where she devoted herself to woodland sports. She was a favorite of Diana, and attended her in the chase. But Echo had one failing: she was fond of talking, and whether in chat or argument, would have the last word. One day Juno was seeking her husband, who, she had reason to fear, was amusing himself among the nymphs. Echo by her talk contrived to detain the goddess till the nymphs made their escape. When Juno discovered it, she passed sentence upon Echo in these words: “You shall forfeit the use of that tongue with which you have cheated me, except for the one purpose you are so fond of—reply. You shall still have the last word, but no power to speak the first.” This nymph saw Narcissus, a beautiful youth, as he pursued the chase upon the mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Mythology and Medical and Psychiatric Terminology
    HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRY Greek mythology and medical and psychiatric terminology Loukas Athanasiadis A great number of terms in modern psychiatry, Narcissus gave his name to narcissism (ex medicine and related disciplines originate from treme self-love based on an idealised self-image). the Greek, including pathology, schizophrenia, He was a young man extremely proud of his ophthalmology, gynaecology, anatomy, pharma beauty and indifferent to the emotions of those cology, biology, hepatology, homeopathy, allo who fell in love with him. A goddess cursed him pathy and many others. There are also many to feel what it is to love and get nothing in return. terms that originate from figures from ancient He subsequently fell in love with his own image Greek mythology (or the Greek words related to when he saw his reflection in the water of a those figures) and I think that it might be fountain, and believed that this image belonged interesting to take a look at some of them. to a spirit. Every time he tried to embrace the Psyche means 'soul' in Greek and she gave her image it disappeared and appeared without names to terms like psychiatry (medicine of the saying a word. At the end the desperate soul), psychology, etc. Psyche was a mortal girl Narcissus died and was turned into a flower that with whom Eros ('love', he gave his name to still bears his name. erotomania, etc.) fell in love. Eros's mother Echo was a very attractive young nymph who Aphrodite had forbidden him to see mortal girls. always wanted to have the last word.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphitrite - Wiktionary
    Amphitrite - Wiktionary https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Amphitrite Amphitrite Definition from Wiktionary, the free dictionary See also: amphitrite Contents 1 Translingual 1.1 Etymology 1.2 Proper noun 1.2.1 Hypernyms 1.3 External links 2 English 2.1 Etymology 2.2 Pronunciation 2.3 Proper noun 2.3.1 Translations Translingual Etymology New Latin , from Ancient Greek Ἀµφιτρίτη ( Amphitrít ē, “mother of Poseidon”), also "three times around", perhaps for the coiled forms specimens take. Amphitrite , unidentified Amphitrite ornata species Proper noun Amphitrite f 1. A taxonomic genus within the family Terebellidae — spaghetti worms, sea-floor-dwelling polychetes. 1 of 2 10/11/2014 5:32 PM Amphitrite - Wiktionary https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Amphitrite Hypernyms (genus ): Animalia - kingdom; Annelida - phylum; Polychaeta - classis; Palpata - subclass; Canalipalpata - order; Terebellida - suborder; Terebellidae - family; Amphitritinae - subfamily External links Terebellidae on Wikipedia. Amphitritinae on Wikispecies. Amphitrite (Terebellidae) on Wikimedia Commons. English Etymology From Ancient Greek Ἀµφιτρίτη ( Amphitrít ē) Pronunciation Amphitrite astronomical (US ) IPA (key): /ˌæm.fɪˈtɹaɪ.ti/ symbol Proper noun Amphitrite 1. (Greek mythology ) A nymph, the wife of Poseidon. 2. (astronomy ) Short for 29 Amphitrite, a main belt asteroid. Translations ±Greek goddess [show ▼] Retrieved from "http://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Amphitrite&oldid=28879262" Categories: Translingual terms derived from New Latin Translingual terms derived from Ancient Greek Translingual lemmas Translingual proper nouns mul:Taxonomic names (genus) English terms derived from Ancient Greek English lemmas English proper nouns en:Greek deities en:Astronomy en:Asteroids This page was last modified on 27 August 2014, at 03:08. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply.
    [Show full text]
  • FAVORITE GREEK MYTHS VARVAKEION STATUETTE Antique Copy of the Athena of Phidias National Museum, Athens FAVORITE GREEK MYTHS
    FAVORITE GREEK MYTHS VARVAKEION STATUETTE Antique copy of the Athena of Phidias National Museum, Athens FAVORITE GREEK MYTHS BY LILIAN STOUGHTON HYDE YESTERDAY’S CLASSICS CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA Cover and arrangement © 2008 Yesterday’s Classics, LLC. Th is edition, fi rst published in 2008 by Yesterday’s Classics, an imprint of Yesterday’s Classics, LLC, is an unabridged republication of the work originally published by D. C. Heath and Company in 1904. For the complete listing of the books that are published by Yesterday’s Classics, please visit www.yesterdaysclassics.com. Yesterday’s Classics is the publishing arm of the Baldwin Online Children’s Literature Project which presents the complete text of hundreds of classic books for children at www.mainlesson.com. ISBN-10: 1-59915-261-4 ISBN-13: 978-1-59915-261-5 Yesterday’s Classics, LLC PO Box 3418 Chapel Hill, NC 27515 PREFACE In the preparation of this book, the aim has been to present in a manner suited to young readers the Greek myths that have been world favorites through the centuries, and that have in some measure exercised a formative infl uence on literature and the fi ne arts in many countries. While a knowledge of these myths is undoubtedly necessary to a clear understanding of much in literature and the arts, yet it is not for this reason alone that they have been selected; the myths that have appealed to the poets, the painters, and the sculptors for so many ages are the very ones that have the greatest depth of meaning, and that are the most beautiful and the best worth telling.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of Echo and Narcissus
    The Story of Echo and Narcissus When Zeus came to the mountains, the wood nymphs rushed to embrace the jovial god. They played with him in icy waterfalls and laughed with him in lush green glades. Zeus’ wife, Hera, was very jealous, and often she searched the mountainside, trying to catch her husband with the nymphs. But whenever Hera came close to finding Zeus, a charming nymph named Echo stepped across her path. Echo chatted with Hera in a lively fashion and did whatever she could to stall the goddess until Zeus and the other nymphs had escaped. Eventually Hera discovered that Echo had been tricking her, and she flew into a rage. “Your tongue has made a fool of me!” she shouted at Echo. “Henceforth, your voice will be more brief, my dear! You will always have the last word - but never the first. From that day on, poor Echo could only repeat the last words of what others said. One day Echo spied a golden-haired youth hunting deer in the woods. The boy’s name was Narcissus, and he was the most beautiful young man in the forest. All who looked upon Narcissus fell in love with him immediately. But he would have nothing to do with anyone, for he was very conceited. When Echo first laid eyes upon Narcissus, her heart burned like the flame of a torch. She secretly followed him through the woods, loving him more with each step. She got closer and closer until finally Narcissus heard the leaves rustling. He whirled around and cried out, “Who’s here?” From behind a tree, Echo repeated his last word, “Here!” Narcissus looked about in wonder, “Who are you? Come to me!” he said.
    [Show full text]
  • Polyphemus in Pastoral and Epic Poetry Grace Anthony Trinity University, [email protected]
    Trinity University Digital Commons @ Trinity Classical Studies Honors Theses Classical Studies Department 5-2017 The aC nnibal’s Cantations: Polyphemus in Pastoral and Epic Poetry Grace Anthony Trinity University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/class_honors Recommended Citation Anthony, Grace, "The aC nnibal’s Cantations: Polyphemus in Pastoral and Epic Poetry" (2017). Classical Studies Honors Theses. 6. http://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/class_honors/6 This Thesis open access is brought to you for free and open access by the Classical Studies Department at Digital Commons @ Trinity. It has been accepted for inclusion in Classical Studies Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Trinity. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Cannibal’s Cantations: Polyphemus in Pastoral and Epic Poetry Grace Anthony A DEPARTMENT HONORS THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF CLASSICAL STUDIES AT TRINITY UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR GRADUATION WITH DEPARTMENTAL HONORS April 17, 2016 Dr. Corinne Pache, Thesis Advisor Dr. Larry Kim, Department Chair Dr. Tim O’ Sullivan, VPAA Student Agreement I grant Trinity University (“Institution”), my academic department (“Department”), and the Texas Digital Library (“TDL”) the non-exclusive rights to copy, display, perform, distribute and publish the content I submit to this repository (hereafter called “work”) and to make the Work available in any format in perpetuity as part of a TDL, Institution or Department repository communication or distribution effort. I understand that once the Work is submitted, a bibliographic citation to the Work can remain visible in perpetuity, even if the Work is updated or removed.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Mythological Allusions and Organic Unity in Romeo and Juliet Kelsey Rhea Taylor
    Fulfilling Their Fate: Roman Mythological Allusions and Organic Unity in Romeo and Juliet Kelsey Rhea Taylor This essay interprets formal elements in explaining character motives and William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, to clarify foreshadowing the fateful conclusion. This essay and achieve a deeper understanding of the predominately focuses on these allusions, which play’s organic unity. While the ironic forbidden are under-researched in current scholarship, to love between the children of the feuding contribute to the contemporary critical Montague and Capulet families establishes the discourse of Romeo and Juliet. primary tension, the “star-cross’d lovers” (Shakespeare, Prologue line 6) ultimately resolve Understanding the play’s Roman allusions and this tension by fulfilling their fated doom. their contribution to its organic unity requires a Shakespeare’s diction, figures of speech, brief look at the play’s conflicts and tensions. metaphors, irony, foreshadowing, and most Shakespeare’s diction highlights these conflicts importantly Ovidian, Roman mythological and tensions, which are inherent in poetic allusions underpin the love/hate tension and language (Bressler 60). The prologue overflows support the play’s resolution and unified with word choices that establish an ambiguous meaning. I analyze the play’s formal elements, tone to the play: all of which reinforce Romeo and Juliet’s fate. Two households, both alike in dignity, Most notably, I examine certain mythological In fair Verona, where we lay our scene, allusions in the play that illuminate the tragic From ancient grudge break to new mutiny, tone and foreshadow the lovers’ demise. Where civil blood makes civil hands unclean. From forth the fatal loins of these two foes Existing scholarship has not sufficiently A pair of star-cross’d lovers take their life .
    [Show full text]
  • Christopher Purves Sings Handel Sunday 7 January 2018 7.30Pm, Milton Court Concert Hall
    Christopher Purves sings Handel Sunday 7 January 2018 7.30pm, Milton Court Concert Hall Handel Rinaldo – ‘Sibilar gli angui d’Aletto’ Siroe, re di Persia – ‘Gelido in ogni vena’ Agrippina – Overture Belshazzar – ‘Opprest with never ceasing grief’ Concerto grosso in D major, Op 6 No 5 Athalia – ‘Ah, canst thou but prove me’ interval 20 minutes Acis and Galatea – ‘I rage, I melt, I burn ... Chris Gloag O ruddier than the cherry’ Aci, Galatea e Polifemo – ‘Fra l’ombre e gl’orrori’ Theodora – Overture Theodora – ‘Racks, gibbets, sword and fire’ Concerto grosso in F major, Op 3 No 4 Esther – ‘How art thou fall’n’ Esther – ‘Turn not, O Queen’ Christopher Purves baritone Arcangelo Jonathan Cohen conductor/harpsichord Part of Barbican Presents 2017–18 Programme produced by Harriet Smith; printed by Trade Winds Colour Printers Ltd; advertising by Cabbell (tel 020 3603 7930) Please turn off watch alarms, phones, pagers etc during the performance. Taking photographs, capturing images or using recording devices during a performance is strictly prohibited. If anything limits your enjoyment please let us know The City of London during your visit. Additional feedback can be given Corporation is the founder and online, as well as via feedback forms or the pods principal funder of located around the foyers. the Barbican Centre Welcome Tonight we welcome one of the most Christopher Purves has already explored distinctive baritones of today – Christopher these characters on disc, with his acclaimed Purves, a musician equally at home Hyperion release with Arcangelo, Handel’s creating new roles in contemporary opera Finest Arias for Base Voice, which will be as he is in the concert hall.
    [Show full text]
  • Abducting Europa: Metamorphosis and Misadventure in Art
    Art Appreciation Lecture Series 2018 The hidden language of art: symbol and allusion Abducting Europa: metamorphosis and misadventure in art Mark Ledbury (University of Sydney) 9/10 May 2018 Lecture summary: From Mosaic to Matisse, the Abduction of the Princess Europa by Jupiter changed into a bull is a favorite narrative for painting. This lecture explores the strange tale, and in particular the currency among painters of its retelling as part of Ovid’s great work, the Metamorphoses – the lecture explores the deep legacy of Ovid’s tale in art, from Medieval Moralising texts and images through great Renaissance and Baroque paintings, to the heyday of eighteenth-century mythological painting. Why did this strangely tragi-comic and yet deeply violent tale appeal so widely to painters, and how might we tease out the less obvious differences and emphases of different generations of painters, who include Titian, Rembrandt, Veronese, and François Boucher, as well as Gauguin and Matisse. Slide list: 1. Pieter Paul Rubens, Venus and Adonis (c.1630, Oil on Canvas, New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art) 2. Julio Romano, “Metamorphoses” frescoes, 1524 Chamber of Ovidio, Palazzo de Te, Mantua, Italy) 3. Diana and Acteon from a set of tapestries representing scenes from Metamorphoses - French, Gobelins Manufacture, Paris: c.1680-1710, New York, Metropolitan Museum 4. Titian, Tityus (Ca. 1565. Oil on canvas, Madrid: Prado) 5. Nicolas Poussin, Echo and Narcissus (c.1630, Oil on Canvas, Paris: Louvre) 6. Two pages from Ovid’s Metamorphoses Moralized (British Library, Ms Royal MS 17 E IV, (Late 15th Century, Dutch) 7. Etienne Falconet, Pygmalion et Galathée (1763, Marble: Baltimore, Walters Art Museum) 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Echo and Narcissus (Extracts from Ovid, Metamorphoses 3.356-510)
    1 Echo and Narcissus (extracts from Ovid, Metamorphoses 3.356-510) Summary of the story The nymph Echo catches sight of the beautiful youth Narcissus as he is hunting in the mountains and falls passionately in love with him. However, Echo has a handicap which makes it difficult for her to let him know how she feels: she can only repeat the words of others and cannot initiate her own speech. By chance Narcissus is separated from his companions, and, as he calls out to them, Echo uses the opportunity to repeat his words in such a way that she expresses her love for him. However, when she shows herself and tries to embrace him he rejects her. Echo wastes away with unrequited love until only her bones, turned into stone, and her voice remain. Meanwhile, Narcissus takes a break from hunting to quench his thirst in a stream. As he bends over to drink he sees his reflection in the water and falls in love with it, not realizing that it is just a reflection. Eventually he realizes his mistake, and wastes away with despair. Echo sees what is happening and joins in his final lament. Finally, Narcissus’ body disappears and in its place appears a flower. Text and adaptation The story is presented as a combination of unadapted Latin and English translation. Apart from the omission of four lines of English translation from Section J (lines 465-8), the text is complete. The set text is prefaced by an introductory passage in italics which is a summary/translation of the lines immediately preceding the set text, 342-55.
    [Show full text]
  • Narcissus and Echo Rosemary Barrow
    20 Narcissus and Echo Rosemary Barrow Echo: See Narcissus In 1937 Salvador Dali painted what was to become one of his most acclaimed works, Metamorphosis of Narcissus. The previous year his fellow surrealist Max Ernst produced the less well known The Nymph Echo (Figure 20.1). Surrealists saw in classical myth a vehicle for the dream‐like free association of objects, below the level of rational consciousness, which their reading of reality calls for. Hence the case in Dali’s painting. Two Narcissus figures are set in a fan- tasy landscape of red cliffs and volcanic sky: the first is a kneeling sculpture with a faceless head looking at his reflection and the second a bodiless hand holding an egg from which the narcissus flower grows. While Echo is absent from Dali’s pic- ture, she is the title figure in Ernst’s The Nymph Echo. The setting here, fantastical once again, consists of monstrous vegetation that serves to camouflage a small standing nude – Echo – in the top right‐hand corner of the canvas. The contrasting reputations of these works by Dali and Ernst (and indeed the unobtrusive presence of the nymph in Ernst’s canvas) mirror much of the reception of Narcissus and Echo. Echo is taken to be of secondary importance. In Reid’s Oxford Guide to Classical Mythology in the Arts (1993), representatively, she is listed in the index, simply: “See Narcissus.” Narcissus, the beautiful boy who falls in love with his own reflection, engenders a copious tradition in post‐classical art, literature, and thought. Son of the river god Cephissus and the nymph Liriope, Narcissus grows up be a handsome youth who rejects his many suitors.
    [Show full text]