1.2 Homomorphisms and Subgroups

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

1.2. HOMOMORPHISMS AND SUBGROUPS 11 1.2 Homomorphisms and Subgroups From now on, unless otherwise specified, we assume that G is a group. Def. Let G be a group and H a subset of G. If H is a group under the product in G, then H is said to be a subgroup of G, denoted by H < G. A group G always has subgroup G and trivial subgroup feg . The other subgroups of G are called proper subgroups of G. Ex. p 1. The additive groups Z < Q < Q[ 2] < R < C. 2. The permutations of f1; 2; ··· ; ng in Sn that leave n fixed form a subgroup isomorphic to Sn−1. Thm 1.3. A nonempty subset H of a group G is a subgroup of G if and only if ab−1 2 H for all a; b 2 H. T Cor 1.4. Let fHi j i 2 Ig be a nonempty family of subgroups of a group G. Then i2I Hi is a subgroup of G. Def. Let G be a subgroup and X a subset of G. Let fHi j i 2 Ig be the family of all subgroups T of G that contain X. Then i2I Hi is called the subgroup of G generated by X and denoted hXi. n1 n2 nt Remark. We have hXi = fa1 a2 ··· at j ai 2 X; ni 2 Zg. In particular, for a 2 G, n hai = fa j n 2 Zg is called a cyclic subgroup of G. Let H and K be subgroups of G. We use H _ K to denote the subgroup generated by H [ K. It is called the join of H and K. Def. Let G and H both be semigroups/monoids/groups. A function f : G ! H is a hmo- morphism provided f(ab) = f(a)f(b) for all a; b 2 G: Remark. 1. ab is the binary operation in G, and f(a)f(b) is the binary operation in H. The homomorphism f is called if f is monomorphism: injective epimorphism: surjective 2. isomorphism: bijective endomorphism: from G to G automorphism: a bijection from G to G 12 CHAPTER 1. GROUPS Ex. 1. f : Z ! Zm by x 7! x¯ := (x mod m) is a group epimorphism. 2. Let G and H be groups. The function ι1 : G ! G × H given by g 7! (g; eH ) is a group monomorphism. The function π1 : G × H ! G given by (g; h) 7! g is a group epimorphism. 3. Let Bn be the group of all nonsingular n × n upper triangular matrices, and Tn the group of all nonsingular n × n diagonal matrices. The function f : Bn ! Tn defined by a 7! f(a), where f(a) is the diagonal matrix of a, is a group epimorphism. The function g : Tn ! Bn defined by inclusion is also a group monomorphism. Def. Let f : G ! H be a group homomorphism. • The kernel of f is Ker f = fa 2 G j f(a) = eH g. It is a (normal) subgroup of G. • If A < G, then f(A) < H, where f(A) = ff(a) j a 2 Gg is the image of A under f. • If B < H, then f −1(B) < G, where f −1(B) = fa 2 G j f(a) 2 Bg is the inverse image of B under f. Remark. 1. A homomorphism f is a monomorphism if and only if Ker f = feg; f is an epimorphism if and only if f(G) = H. 2. For a 2 G, the inverse image of f(a) 2 H is f −1(f(a)) = a · Ker f = fan j n 2 Ker fg:.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Group Homomorphisms
1-17-2018 Group Homomorphisms Here are the operation tables for two groups of order 4: · 1 a a2 + 0 1 2 1 1 a a2 0 0 1 2 a a a2 1 1 1 2 0 a2 a2 1 a 2 2 0 1 There is an obvious sense in which these two groups are “the same”: You can get the second table from the first by replacing 0 with 1, 1 with a, and 2 with a2. When are two groups the same? You might think of saying that two groups are the same if you can get one group’s table from the other by substitution, as above. However, there are problems with this. In the first place, it might be very difficult to check — imagine having to write down a multiplication table for a group of order 256! In the second place, it’s not clear what a “multiplication table” is if a group is infinite. One way to implement a substitution is to use a function. In a sense, a function is a thing which “substitutes” its output for its input. I’ll define what it means for two groups to be “the same” by using certain kinds of functions between groups. These functions are called group homomorphisms; a special kind of homomorphism, called an isomorphism, will be used to define “sameness” for groups. Definition. Let G and H be groups. A homomorphism from G to H is a function f : G → H such that f(x · y)= f(x) · f(y) forall x,y ∈ G.
[Show full text]
Category of G-Groups and Its Spectral Category
Communications in Algebra ISSN: 0092-7872 (Print) 1532-4125 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lagb20 Category of G-Groups and its Spectral Category María José Arroyo Paniagua & Alberto Facchini To cite this article: María José Arroyo Paniagua & Alberto Facchini (2017) Category of G-Groups and its Spectral Category, Communications in Algebra, 45:4, 1696-1710, DOI: 10.1080/00927872.2016.1222409 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00927872.2016.1222409 Accepted author version posted online: 07 Oct 2016. Published online: 07 Oct 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 12 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=lagb20 Download by: [UNAM Ciudad Universitaria] Date: 29 November 2016, At: 17:29 COMMUNICATIONS IN ALGEBRA® 2017, VOL. 45, NO. 4, 1696–1710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00927872.2016.1222409 Category of G-Groups and its Spectral Category María José Arroyo Paniaguaa and Alberto Facchinib aDepartamento de Matemáticas, División de Ciencias Básicas e Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Iztapalapa, Mexico, D. F., México; bDipartimento di Matematica, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Let G be a group. We analyse some aspects of the category G-Grp of G-groups. Received 15 April 2016 In particular, we show that a construction similar to the construction of the Revised 22 July 2016 spectral category, due to Gabriel and Oberst, and its dual, due to the second Communicated by T. Albu. author, is possible for the category G-Grp.
[Show full text]
Categories of Sets with a Group Action
Categories of sets with a group action Bachelor Thesis of Joris Weimar under supervision of Professor S.J. Edixhoven Mathematisch Instituut, Universiteit Leiden Leiden, 13 June 2008 Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Abstract . .1 1.2 Working method . .1 1.2.1 Notation . .1 2 Categories 3 2.1 Basics . .3 2.1.1 Functors . .4 2.1.2 Natural transformations . .5 2.2 Categorical constructions . .6 2.2.1 Products and coproducts . .6 2.2.2 Fibered products and ﬁbered coproducts . .9 3 An equivalence of categories 13 3.1 G-sets . 13 3.2 Covering spaces . 15 3.2.1 The fundamental group . 15 3.2.2 Covering spaces and the homotopy lifting property . 16 3.2.3 Induced homomorphisms . 18 3.2.4 Classifying covering spaces through the fundamental group . 19 3.3 The equivalence . 24 3.3.1 The functors . 25 4 Applications and examples 31 4.1 Automorphisms and recovering the fundamental group . 31 4.2 The Seifert-van Kampen theorem . 32 4.2.1 The categories C1, C2, and πP -Set ................... 33 4.2.2 The functors . 34 4.2.3 Example . 36 Bibliography 38 Index 40 iii 1 Introduction 1.1 Abstract In the 40s, Mac Lane and Eilenberg introduced categories. Although by some referred to as abstract nonsense, the idea of categories allows one to talk about mathematical objects and their relationions in a general setting. Its origins lie in the ﬁeld of algebraic topology, one of the topics that will be explored in this thesis. First, a concise introduction to categories will be given.
[Show full text]
The General Linear Group
18.704 Gabe Cunningham 2/18/05 [email protected] The General Linear Group Definition: Let F be a field. Then the general linear group GLn(F ) is the group of invert- ible n × n matrices with entries in F under matrix multiplication. It is easy to see that GLn(F ) is, in fact, a group: matrix multiplication is associative; the identity element is In, the n × n matrix with 1’s along the main diagonal and 0’s everywhere else; and the matrices are invertible by choice. It’s not immediately clear whether GLn(F ) has infinitely many elements when F does. However, such is the case. Let a ∈ F , a 6= 0. −1 Then a · In is an invertible n × n matrix with inverse a · In. In fact, the set of all such × matrices forms a subgroup of GLn(F ) that is isomorphic to F = F \{0}. It is clear that if F is a finite field, then GLn(F ) has only finitely many elements. An interesting question to ask is how many elements it has. Before addressing that question fully, let’s look at some examples. ∼ × Example 1: Let n = 1. Then GLn(Fq) = Fq , which has q − 1 elements. a b Example 2: Let n = 2; let M = ( c d ). Then for M to be invertible, it is necessary and sufficient that ad 6= bc. If a, b, c, and d are all nonzero, then we can fix a, b, and c arbitrarily, and d can be anything but a−1bc. This gives us (q − 1)3(q − 2) matrices.
[Show full text]
Nearly Locally Presentable Categories Are Locally Presentable Is Equivalent to Vopˇenka’S Principle
NEARLY LOCALLY PRESENTABLE CATEGORIES L. POSITSELSKI AND J. ROSICKY´ Abstract. We introduce a new class of categories generalizing locally presentable ones. The distinction does not manifest in the abelian case and, assuming Vopˇenka’s principle, the same happens in the regular case. The category of complete partial orders is the natural example of a nearly locally finitely presentable category which is not locally presentable. 1. Introduction Locally presentable categories were introduced by P. Gabriel and F. Ulmer in [6]. A category K is locally λ-presentable if it is cocomplete and has a strong generator consisting of λ-presentable objects. Here, λ is a regular cardinal and an object A is λ-presentable if its hom-functor K(A, −): K → Set preserves λ-directed colimits. A category is locally presentable if it is locally λ-presentable for some λ. This con- cept of presentability formalizes the usual practice – for instance, finitely presentable groups are precisely groups given by finitely many generators and finitely many re- lations. Locally presentable categories have many nice properties, in particular they are complete and co-wellpowered. Gabriel and Ulmer [6] also showed that one can define locally presentable categories by using just monomorphisms instead all morphisms. They defined λ-generated ob- jects as those whose hom-functor K(A, −) preserves λ-directed colimits of monomor- phisms. Again, this concept formalizes the usual practice – finitely generated groups are precisely groups admitting a finite set of generators. This leads to locally gener- ated categories, where a cocomplete category K is locally λ-generated if it has a strong arXiv:1710.10476v2 [math.CT] 2 Apr 2018 generator consisting of λ-generated objects and every object of K has only a set of strong quotients.
[Show full text]
Självständiga Arbeten I Matematik
SJÄLVSTÄNDIGA ARBETEN I MATEMATIK MATEMATISKA INSTITUTIONEN, STOCKHOLMS UNIVERSITET Geometric interpretation of non-associative composition algebras av Fredrik Cumlin 2020 - No K13 MATEMATISKA INSTITUTIONEN, STOCKHOLMS UNIVERSITET, 106 91 STOCKHOLM Geometric interpretation of non-associative composition algebras Fredrik Cumlin Självständigt arbete i matematik 15 högskolepoäng, grundnivå Handledare: Wushi Goldring 2020 Abstract This paper aims to discuss the connection between non-associative composition algebra and geometry. It will first recall the notion of an algebra, and investigate the properties of an algebra together with a com- position norm. The composition norm will induce a law on the algebra, which is stated as the composition law. This law is then used to derive the multiplication and conjugation laws, where the last is also known as convolution. These laws are then used to prove Hurwitz’s celebrated the- orem concerning the different finite composition algebras. More properties of composition algebras will be covered, in order to look at the structure of the quaternions H and octonions O. The famous Fano plane will be the finishing touch of the relationship between the standard orthogonal vectors which construct the octonions. Lastly, the notion of invertible maps in relation to invertible loops will be covered, to later show the connection between 8 dimensional rotations − and multiplication of unit octonions. 2 Contents 1 Algebra 4 1.1 The multiplication laws . .6 1.2 The conjugation laws . .7 1.3 Dickson double . .8 1.4 Hurwitz’s theorem . 11 2 Properties of composition algebras 14 2.1 The left-, right- and bi-multiplication maps . 16 2.2 Basic properties of quaternions and octonions .
[Show full text]
Normal Subgroups of the General Linear Groups Over Von Neumann Regular Rings L
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 96, Number 2, February 1986 NORMAL SUBGROUPS OF THE GENERAL LINEAR GROUPS OVER VON NEUMANN REGULAR RINGS L. N. VASERSTEIN1 ABSTRACT. Let A be a von Neumann regular ring or, more generally, let A be an associative ring with 1 whose reduction modulo its Jacobson radical is von Neumann regular. We obtain a complete description of all subgroups of GLn A, n > 3, which are normalized by elementary matrices. 1. Introduction. For any associative ring A with 1 and any natural number n, let GLn A be the group of invertible n by n matrices over A and EnA the subgroup generated by all elementary matrices x1'3, where 1 < i / j < n and x E A. In this paper we describe all subgroups of GLn A normalized by EnA for any von Neumann regular A, provided n > 3. Our description is standard (see Bass [1] and Vaserstein [14, 16]): a subgroup H of GL„ A is normalized by EnA if and only if H is of level B for an ideal B of A, i.e. E„(A, B) C H C Gn(A, B). Here Gn(A, B) is the inverse image of the center of GL„(,4/S) (when n > 2, this center consists of scalar invertible matrices over the center of the ring A/B) under the canonical homomorphism GL„ A —►GLn(A/B) and En(A, B) is the normal subgroup of EnA generated by all elementary matrices in Gn(A, B) (when n > 3, the group En(A, B) is generated by matrices of the form (—y)J'lx1'Jy:i''1 with x € B,y £ A,l < i ^ j < n, see [14]).
[Show full text]
Variational Problems on Flows of Diffeomorphisms for Image Matching
QUARTERLY OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS VOLUME LVI, NUMBER 3 SEPTEMBER 1998, PAGES 587-600 VARIATIONAL PROBLEMS ON FLOWS OF DIFFEOMORPHISMS FOR IMAGE MATCHING By PAUL DUPUIS (LCDS, Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, RI), ULF GRENANDER (Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, Rl), AND MICHAEL I. MILLER (Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO) Abstract. This paper studies a variational formulation of the image matching prob- lem. We consider a scenario in which a canonical representative image T is to be carried via a smooth change of variable into an image that is intended to provide a good fit to the observed data. The images are all defined on an open bounded set GcR3, The changes of variable are determined as solutions of the nonlinear Eulerian transport equation ==v(rj(s;x),s), r)(t;x)=x, (0.1) with the location 77(0;x) in the canonical image carried to the location x in the deformed image. The variational problem then takes the form arg mm ;||2 + [ |Tor?(0;a;) - D(x)\2dx (0.2) JG where ||v|| is an appropriate norm on the velocity field v(-, •), and the second term at- tempts to enforce fidelity to the data. In this paper we derive conditions under which the variational problem described above is well posed. The key issue is the choice of the norm. Conditions are formulated under which the regularity of v(-, ■) imposed by finiteness of the norm guarantees that the associated flow is supported on a space of diffeomorphisms. The problem (0.2) can Received March 15, 1996.
[Show full text]
Coreflective Subcategories
transactions of the american mathematical society Volume 157, June 1971 COREFLECTIVE SUBCATEGORIES BY HORST HERRLICH AND GEORGE E. STRECKER Abstract. General morphism factorization criteria are used to investigate categorical reflections and coreflections, and in particular epi-reflections and mono- coreflections. It is shown that for most categories with "reasonable" smallness and completeness conditions, each coreflection can be "split" into the composition of two mono-coreflections and that under these conditions mono-coreflective subcategories can be characterized as those which are closed under the formation of coproducts and extremal quotient objects. The relationship of reflectivity to closure under limits is investigated as well as coreflections in categories which have "enough" constant morphisms. 1. Introduction. The concept of reflections in categories (and likewise the dual notion—coreflections) serves the purpose of unifying various fundamental con- structions in mathematics, via "universal" properties that each possesses. His- torically, the concept seems to have its roots in the fundamental construction of E. Cech [4] whereby (using the fact that the class of compact spaces is productive and closed-hereditary) each completely regular F2 space is densely embedded in a compact F2 space with a universal extension property. In [3, Appendice III; Sur les applications universelles] Bourbaki has shown the essential underlying similarity that the Cech-Stone compactification has with other mathematical extensions, such as the completion of uniform spaces and the embedding of integral domains in their fields of fractions. In doing so, he essentially defined the notion of reflections in categories. It was not until 1964, when Freyd [5] published the first book dealing exclusively with the theory of categories, that sufficient categorical machinery and insight were developed to allow for a very simple formulation of the concept of reflections and for a basic investigation of reflections as entities themselvesi1).
[Show full text]
LECTURE 12: LIE GROUPS and THEIR LIE ALGEBRAS 1. Lie
LECTURE 12: LIE GROUPS AND THEIR LIE ALGEBRAS 1. Lie groups Deﬁnition 1.1. A Lie group G is a smooth manifold equipped with a group structure so that the group multiplication µ : G × G ! G; (g1; g2) 7! g1 · g2 is a smooth map. Example. Here are some basic examples: • Rn, considered as a group under addition. • R∗ = R − f0g, considered as a group under multiplication. • S1, Considered as a group under multiplication. • Linear Lie groups GL(n; R), SL(n; R), O(n) etc. • If M and N are Lie groups, so is their product M × N. Remarks. (1) (Hilbert's 5th problem, [Gleason and Montgomery-Zippin, 1950's]) Any topological group whose underlying space is a topological manifold is a Lie group. (2) Not every smooth manifold admits a Lie group structure. For example, the only spheres that admit a Lie group structure are S0, S1 and S3; among all the compact 2 dimensional surfaces the only one that admits a Lie group structure is T 2 = S1 × S1. (3) Here are two simple topological constraints for a manifold to be a Lie group: • If G is a Lie group, then TG is a trivial bundle. n { Proof: We identify TeG = R . The vector bundle isomorphism is given by φ : G × TeG ! T G; φ(x; ξ) = (x; dLx(ξ)) • If G is a Lie group, then π1(G) is an abelian group. { Proof: Suppose α1, α2 2 π1(G). Deﬁne α : [0; 1] × [0; 1] ! G by α(t1; t2) = α1(t1) · α2(t2). Then along the bottom edge followed by the right edge we have the composition α1 ◦ α2, where ◦ is the product of loops in the fundamental group, while along the left edge followed by the top edge we get α2 ◦ α1.
[Show full text]
On Generalizations of Sylow Tower Groups
Pacific Journal of Mathematics ON GENERALIZATIONS OF SYLOW TOWER GROUPS ABI (ABIADBOLLAH)FATTAHI Vol. 45, No. 2 October 1973 PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol. 45, No. 2, 1973 ON GENERALIZATIONS OF SYLOW TOWER GROUPS ABIABDOLLAH FATTAHI In this paper two different generalizations of Sylow tower groups are studied. In Chapter I the notion of a fc-tower group is introduced and a bound on the nilpotence length (Fitting height) of an arbitrary finite solvable group is found. In the same chapter a different proof to a theorem of Baer is given; and the list of all minimal-not-Sylow tower groups is obtained. Further results are obtained on a different generalization of Sylow tower groups, called Generalized Sylow Tower Groups (GSTG) by J. Derr. It is shown that the class of all GSTG's of a fixed complexion form a saturated formation, and a structure theorem for all such groups is given. NOTATIONS The following notations will be used throughont this paper: N<]G N is a normal subgroup of G ΛΓCharG N is a characteristic subgroup of G ΛΓ OG N is a minimal normal subgroup of G M< G M is a proper subgroup of G M<- G M is a maximal subgroup of G Z{G) the center of G #>-part of the order of G, p a prime set of all prime divisors of \G\ Φ(G) the Frattini subgroup of G — the intersec- tion of all maximal subgroups of G [H]K semi-direct product of H by K F(G) the Fitting subgroup of G — the maximal normal nilpotent subgroup of G C(H) = CG(H) the centralizer of H in G N(H) = NG(H) the normalizer of H in G PeSy\p(G) P is a Sylow ^-subgroup of G P is a Sy-subgroup of G PeSγlp(G) Core(H) = GoreG(H) the largest normal subgroup of G contained in H= ΓioeoH* KG) the nilpotence length (Fitting height) of G h(G) p-length of G d(G) minimal number of generators of G c(P) nilpotence class of the p-group P some nonnegative power of prime p OP(G) largest normal p-subgroup of G 453 454 A.
[Show full text]
Categories of Modules for Idempotent Rings and Morita Equivalences
Master's Thesis Categories of Modules for Idempotent Rings and Morita Equivalences I Leandro Marm 1997 t Department of Mathematics University of Glasgow University Gardens Glasgow, G12 8QW ProQuest Number: 13834261 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 13834261 Published by ProQuest LLC(2019). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 10$ af 7 En resolucion, el se enfrasco tanto en su lectura, que se le pasaban las noches leyendo de claro en claro, y los dias de turbio en turbio; y asi, del poco dormir y del mucho leer se le seco el celebro 1 de manera, que vino a perder el juicio. M iguel de C ervantes Sa a v e d r a : El Ingenioso Hidalgo don Quijote de la Mancha. 1In modern Spanish this word is written ”cerebro” C ontents Chapter 1, Introduction 4 Chapter 2. Categories of Modules for Rings I 7 1. Noncommutative Localization 7 2. The Construction of the Categories 11 3. The Equivalence of the Categories 24 4. The Independence of the Base Ring 28 Chapter 3.
[Show full text]