'A Friend in Need Is a Friend Indeed'?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

'A Friend in Need Is a Friend Indeed'? ‘A friend in need is a friend indeed’? The role of ‘Europe’ when discussing budgetary decisions: analysing parliamentary debates on planning documents in Italy (2006-2014) Alba Ferreri1 Introduction The role of national legislatures within the European economic governance … ‘under pressure’ Ever since the reforms started in 2005-2006, a new architecture of the economic policy-making has emerged in the EU (Begg 2006: 2). The revised version of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP2), the re-launch of the Lisbon strategy and the allocation of the EU multiannual financial framework 2007-2013 were some of the building blocks of this reviewed structure – encompassing structural policies and measures pertaining the demand side. Such modifications were oriented to provide stability and coordination under the umbrella of the ‘Lisbon II’ strategy, which somehow comprised all the other economic governance processes sponsored and supervised by the European Commission. The outbreak of the economic and financial crisis has seriously put under pressure the whole system, especially for what the relationship between monetary integration and democratic government in the EU is concerned (Crum 2013). In particular, the principal characteristic of the regulatory framework established to face the crisis at a European level is fragmentation; also, the varied nature of the instruments adopted by the EU institutions and through intergovernmental treaties, coordination measures and acts addressed to some or all the member states has proved to be somehow limiting for what parliamentary participation is concerned3. For instance, the so-called ‘two pack4‘ brought new powers to the European Commission, for controlling the member state budgetary plans – thereby taking control off national parliaments, without providing any compensation in democratic terms. As the German constitutional court underlined in the ‘Lisbon ruling’ dated 20095, the question of the level at which democratic legitimacy of economic governance measures should be provided is controversial. However, since national parliaments traditionally hold budgetary prerogatives at national level, one could consider them as the only source of legitimacy for these measures. 1PhD Candidate in European and Comparative Politics, Centre for the Study of Political Change (CIRCaP) – University of Siena 2 The Stability and Growth Pact primarily entered into force on Jan 1999, with the purpose of ensuring the maintenance of fiscal discipline and the enforcement of the EMU. In March 2005, the EU Council, under the pressure of France and Germany, relaxed the rules – in order to better respond to criticisms of insufficient flexibility and to make the pact more enforceable. Another reform was enacted in March 2011, due to the breakthrough of the economic and financial crisis. The EU member states adopted a new reform under the Open Method of Coordination, aiming at straightening the rules e.g. by adopting an automatic procedure for imposing of penalties in case of breaches of either the deficit or the debt rules. The new ‘Euro Plus Pact’ is designed as a more stringent successor to the Stability and Growth Pact, which has not been implemented consistently. 3 An interesting report on the role of the European Parliament in anti-crisis decision-making is available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/bibliotheque/briefing/2012/120397/LDM_BRI(2012)120397_REV1_EN.pdf 4 The so-called ‘Six-Pack’, five regulations and one directive4 into force as of December 2011, with a view to strengthening the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) anticipated the ‘Two-Pack’, two further regulations aimed to strengthen euro area budgetary surveillance. This reform package entered into force on 30 May 2013 in all Euro area Member States. The new measures were meant to increase transparency on their budgetary decisions and stronger coordination within the 2014 budgetary cycle, as well as to recognize the special needs of Euro area Member States under severe financial pressure. 5 http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/entscheidungen/es20090630_2bve000208en.html In this direction could be read Van Rompuy's report titled ‘Towards a genuine economic and monetary Union’6(December 2012). It states that democratic control and accountability should occur at the level at which decisions are taken: while assuming that, it is also specified that this principle, key to ensuring the effectiveness of the integrated financial, budgetary and economic policy framework, should maintain ‘the pivotal role of national parliaments, as appropriate’ (p.16). In fact – it is premised – ‘decisions on national budgets are at the heart of Member States' parliamentary democracies’. Notwithstanding such an appraisal, recent research (Poiares Maduro 2012; Fasone 2014) points out that the position of national parliaments has been negatively influenced by the reform of the economic governance in the EU. Just a few years after the entry into force of the Lisbon treaty – which managed to create new mechanisms for involving national parliaments in EU policy-making, expanding their room of maneuver (Neuhold and Strelkov 2012), the continuous resort to inter-governmental procedures characterizing the ‘new’ economic governance structure (Fabbrini 2013) appears to have marginalized again those representative bodies. As Fasone (2014: 1) righteously states, the EU law stemming from the reform of the economic governance […] almost completely disregards national parliaments, leaving only to the ‘Fiscal Compact7‘ the task of recognizing a role for national parliaments as participants – alongside with the European Parliament – to the application of the treaty (art. 13). Of course, the implementation of the measures provided by the new European economic governance framework requires parliaments to re-adjust, by means of finding new inputs to exercise already existing powers or, else, to arrange them according to new formats (Fasone 2014). Such an operation naturally entails different processes of adaptation, according to the positions of each member state. Furthermore – Cotta (2014: 74) remarks, ‘in a compound polity like the EU combining theoretically sovereign nation- states within a significant supranational architecture where it is not yet clearly decided which of the two levels prevails, divergences are to be expected when framing a crisis’. It follows that finding asymmetries in the way parliaments respond to this changing scenario is not surprising at all – and specifically this may hang on the degree of parliamentary autonomy on fiscal and budgetary matters (Fasone 2014). According to some observers (Deruelle 2013), this differentiation has overall produced two parallel phenomena: first, a process of harmonisation of national legislatures’ modi operandi; second, a series of a series of coercive measures which raises the question of coercive federalism – hereby conceived reminding Kincaid’s (1990) understanding of it8. More than that, concerns have been voiced by scholars envisaging a possible extension of the democratic deficit of the EU – subsequent to the crisis – to a point of ‘democratic default’ (Majone 2012). 6 Text available online at http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/134069.pdf 7 The so-called Fiscal Compact is an international agreement outside the EU legal framework signed by all EU member states but the UK and the Czech Republic, please find the online text at http://www.european-council.europa.eu/media/639226/10_-_tscg.it.12.pdf 8 As explained by Kincaid, coercive federalism is a perverted version of cooperative federalism: in a cooperative system, once the highest level of governance cannot rely on federated entities to achieve its goal, it will rely on coercive measures. Coercive federalism, by its ‘violent’ nature brings the assumption that tensions arise in the system of governance. The risk is thus to have difficulties in achieving common goals between the two level of governance whereas the option of cooperative federalism ensures a much smoother approach of inter-institutional relations and multilevel governance. More on the point when reading Deruelle 2013. Parliaments and the communicative function To date, the literature has greatly focused on formal valuations of the abovementioned facts, tackling the national parliaments (NPs’) legal responses or gaging changes in institutional organisations and functioning. The emphasis here is instead on the so-called ‘communicative function’ exercised by national arenas (Auel and Raunio 2012, 2014). The assumption is that a more dynamic debating role (Wendler 2014) of the parliament may be a good starting point to justify an enhancement of the parliament’s relevance with respect to other (national and European) institutions. Particularly, a territory that still appears as partially uncharted is the role played by national parliaments as representatives of different political positions and interests primarily expressed by citizens and manifested in the parliaments by the national representatives of the political parties. The underlying puzzle is whether parliamentary discourses are adapting to the new, externally induced, forms of governance brought by the mounting European commitment lately experienced, specifically on the matters of fiscal discipline and budgetary policy. The concept of ‘implementation’ is also touched upon – conceiving the latter as deriving from the thematization operated by parliamentarians discussing policy issues within the arena observed, namely the parliament.
Recommended publications
  • Economic Crisis in a Stalemated Democracy. the Italian Case Leonardo Morlino Daniela Piana
    LUISS Guido Carli Dipartimento di Scienze politiche Economic Crisis in a Stalemated Democracy. The Italian Case Leonardo Morlino Daniela Piana Working Paper 1/2014 LUISS Guido Carli / Department of Political Science Working paper n. 1-2014 Publication date: April 2014 Economic crisis in a stalemated democracy. The Italian case © 2014 Leonardo Morlino; Daniela Piana ISBN 978-88-6856-007-2 This working paper is distributed for purposes of comment and discussion only. It may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder. LUISS Academy is an imprint of LUISS University Press – Pola s.r.l. a socio unico Viale Pola 12, 00198 Roma Tel. 06 85225485 e-mail [email protected] www.luissuniversitypress.it Editorial Committee: Leonardo Morlino (chair) Paolo Boccardelli Matteo Caroli Giovanni Fiori Daniele Gallo Nicola Lupo Stefano Manzocchi Giuseppe Melis Marcello Messori Gianfranco Pellegrino Giovanni Piccirilli Arlo Poletti Andrea Prencipe Pietro Reichlin ECONOMIC CRISIS IN A STALEMATED DEMOCRACY. THE ITALIAN CASE Leonardo Morlino*1e Daniela Piana**2 Abstract In Southern Europe, the economic crisis (2008-2013) triggered a deeper political crisis, af- fecting a number of aspects of a representative democracy. Italy provides a particularly telling case of what happens when an economic crisis occurs in an unstable political context characte- - pation, fragmented and radicalized party competition, social inequality, high public debt, and otherrized byrelated low governmentfeatures, here effectiveness, summarized low in the efficiency, model of corruption, “stalemated decline democracy”. of electoral On the partici basis of a comprehensive data set developed along with eight dimensions of democracy assessment and taking into account the policies pursued during the years of the crisis, we analyze the dif- ferent effects of economic crisis—some of them expected, others more surprising—and how those effects characterize Italian political crisis and a new phase of great uncertainty.
    [Show full text]
  • 302 Marco Bassini* Abstract the Spread of Fake News on the Internet
    RISE OF POPULISM AND THE FIVE STAR MOVEMENT MODEL: AN ITALIAN CASE STUDY Marco Bassini* Abstract The spread of fake news on the Internet, the educational divide, the adverse effects of the economic crisis and the emergence of international terrorism are often ranked among the factors that led to the rise of populism. However, quite rarely it is called into question whether (and how) the distrust of mainstream political parties had an impact on the rise of populism across the Western democracies. Adopting a constitutional law perspective requires looking at the rise of populism through the lenses of the crisis of democratic representation. The paper aims at exploring the Italian scenario, where the anti-establishment Five Star Movement has grown up as leading populist force fostering a direct political participation of voters through the use of the Internet that is supposed to bring, in the long run, to political disintermediation. In this respect, the goal of the paper is to explore from a constitutional law perspective the grounds on which the rise of this anti-establishment movement has relied and the constraints that the Constitution may place on the populist surge. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction.....................................................................................303 2. Political parties in the Italian Constitution..................................305 3. How the Five Star Movement entered the political arena........312 4. Some key factors behind the rise of populism in Italy..............316 5. Pars destruens – Some critical remarks on the Five Star Movement................................................................323 6. Pars construens – Making political parties democratic again?..329 *Postdoctoral Researcher in Constitutional Law, University of Milan “Bocconi” 302 ITALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC LAW, VOL.
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of Equality 1948-2018. Seventy Years of Elections in Italy: How Are Women Faring in Terms of Power?
    In search of equality 1948-2018. Seventy years of elections in Italy: how are women faring in terms of power? July 2018 The first general election in Republican Italy was held on 18 April 1948. In the first Parliament there were only 49 women, accounting for 5%. Almost 30 years went by before Italy had more than 50 women in Parliament: it happened in 1976. It then took another 30 years to top the threshold of 150 women MPs, in 2006. In 2018, more than 300 women were elected for the first time: with 4,327 women running for election out of 9,529 candidates (almost half), 334 women were elect- ed. Currently, one MP in three is a woman and, for the first time in the Republic’s history, the second office of the State – the president of the Senate – is a woman. And what about the government? No woman has ever been appointed President of the Council of Ministers. Over 1,500 ministers have been appointed in 65 differ- ent cabinets, with women appointed ministers only 83 times (5 in the current gov- ernment) – 41 times as ministers without portfolio. The path to equality is still long, even on a local level: only two Region Presidents out of 20 are women and every 100 mayors, 87 are men. The starting point The Italian Constitution acknowledges, under article 3, the principle of gender equality, which was further strengthened in 2003 following an amendment to article 51: “the Re- public promotes, with specific provisions, equal opportunities for women and men”.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Laws Fit for the Present Day: the Government of Change and the Precariousness of Choices During Italy’S Long Transition
    Italian Political Science, VOLUME 15 ISSUE 2, SEPTEMBER 2020 Making Laws Fit for the Present Day: the Government of Change and the precariousness of choices during Italy’s Long Transition Valerio Di Porto DIRPOLIS INSTITUTE, PISA Abstract This article retraces the events of the first Conte government from its difficult birth by contract through to its foreseen death and seeks to establish a connection between the political-institutional aspects of this unprece- dented government alliance and the use of legislative instruments, as well as between the devaluation of Parliament and the successes of legislative parliamentary initiatives. This reconstruction also compares the first months of the 18th legislature with the first months of the preceding legislatures of the so-called ‘Second Re- public’. The conclusion will be that this legislature distinguishes itself from certain preceding long-term legislatures (the 13th, 14th, 16th and 17th) by an approach orientated exclusively to the present and to constitu- tional reforms that are very small in dimension but huge in impact (such as reducing the number of parliamentarians). Like the other legislatures, it will end with a government and a majority which are different from the original ones, but perhaps with the same prime minister. When that will happen is obviously unclear. 1. A slow gestation mong the legislatures under the so-called Second Republic, the 18th took the long- est time to become fully operational: seventy-five days to form a government and Aninety to establish the permanent parliamentary committees. The 17th legislature, which also had a weak start, required less time despite undergoing elections for the Pres- ident of the Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Selectorate Model of Government Stability: an Application to Italy
    Department of Political Science Chair of Political Science The Selectorate Model of Government Stability: an Application to Italy Prof. ID 082702 De Sio Pierluigi Gagliardi SUPERVISOR CANDIDATE Academic Year 2018/2019 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 3 CHAPTER 1 - History of the Italian Political System anD Government Stability ...................... 7 1.1 The Liberal State .............................................................................................................................. 7 1.1.1 The Historical Right and Left ............................................................................................................................ 7 1.1.2 The Giolitti Era ................................................................................................................................................. 9 1.2 Fascism and the transition to Democracy ...................................................................................... 10 1.2.1 Fascism ........................................................................................................................................................... 10 1.2.2 Transition to democracy ................................................................................................................................ 11 1.2.3 The end of Fascism (1943-1945) ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Fiscal Policy Announcements by the Italian Government on the Sovereign Spread:A Comparative Analysis
    Working Paper Series Matteo Falagiarda and The impact of fiscal policy Wildmer Daniel Gregori announcements by the Italian government on the sovereign spread: a comparative analysis 1782 / April 2015 Note: This Working Paper should not be reported as representing the views of the European Central Bank (ECB). The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the ECB Abstract This paper attempts to evaluate the impact of fiscal policy announcements by the Italian government on the long-term sovereign bond spread of Italy relative to Ger- many. After collecting data on relevant fiscal policy announcements, we perform an econometric comparative analysis between the three administrations that followed one another during the period 2009-2013. The results indicate that only fiscal pol- icy announcements made by members of Monti's cabinet had a significant impact on the Italian spread. We argue that these findings may be partly explained by a credibility gap between Monti's technocratic administration and Berlusconi's and Letta's governments. JEL codes: E43, E62, G01, G12 Keywords: Fiscal policy announcements, political communication, sovereign debt crisis, interest rate spread, GARCH models ECB Working Paper 1782, April 2015 1 Non-Technical Summary The recent economic crisis challenged the ability of national governments to guarantee eco- nomic stability and the sustainability of sovereign debt. There is empirical evidence that countries that do not have sound public finance, such as substantial fiscal deficit or an ex- cessively high debt level, are likely to face higher risk premia required by financial market participants. Since 2009 the spread between long-term government bond yields of some euro area countries vis-`a-visthe German ones experienced not only a dramatic increase, but also an augmented differentiation among countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Government in the Time of Crisis
    mini dossier Government in the Time of Crisis A comparison of the Berlusconi, Monti, Letta and Renzi Cabinets Number 2 | February 2015 GOVERNMENT IN THE TIME OF CRISIS A comparison of the Berlusconi, Monti, Letta and Renzi Cabinets mini dossier Summary 3 INTRODUCTION 5 THE COMPOSITION OF GOVERNMENTS From average age, to offices held by ministers under 40, as well as the gender issue • Number of members • Presence of women • Which office for women Ministers • Average age • Amount of under 40 • Offices held by Ministers under 40 11 THE PARLIAMENTARY MAJORITY How the Numbers of the coalition in power change • Parties in the Cabinet • Technocrats: amount and offices • Numbers of the majority in key votes • Council of Ministers: changes in time • Politicians with most postings throughout the 4 Governments 16 THE ACTIVITY OF CABINETS Legislative production and votes of confidence • Legislative acts • Decrees not transposed in law • Approved laws: Government and Parliament proposals • Success rate according to initiative • Time for approval • Votes of confidence • Impact of votes of confidence on approved laws • Approved laws with most votes of confidence • How much do Ministers reply to parliamentary inquiries • How much do Governments reply to parliamentary inquiries • Attendance of MPs that are part of the Government 23 POLITICAL AGENDA Discussed themes and debates issues • Main topics • 5 themes in time, a comparison 2 mini dossier 240 politicians in power Introduction 170 Decress 136 Dealing with the economic crisis has been the main concern for Votes of confidence world politics in recent years. In Italy - where social groups were particularly hit - this period happened to coincide with the XVI and XVII parliamentary Legislatures, in which 4 different Governments 490 followed one another: Berlusconi IV, Monti, Letta and Renzi.
    [Show full text]
  • A Signed Network Perspective on the Government Formation Process in Parliamentary Democracies Angela Fontan & Claudio Altafni*
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN A signed network perspective on the government formation process in parliamentary democracies Angela Fontan & Claudio Altafni* In parliamentary democracies, government negotiations talks following a general election can sometimes be a long and laborious process. In order to explain this phenomenon, in this paper we use structural balance theory to represent a multiparty parliament as a signed network, with edge signs representing alliances and rivalries among parties. We show that the notion of frustration, which quantifes the amount of “disorder” encoded in the signed graph, correlates very well with the duration of the government negotiation talks. For the 29 European countries considered in this study, the average correlation between frustration and government negotiation talks ranges between 0.42 and 0.69, depending on what information is included in the edges of the signed network. Dynamical models of collective decision-making over signed networks with varying frustration are proposed to explain this correlation. In a country adopting a multiparty parliamentary system, the process of forming a government afer a general election can be quick, or can sometimes be impervious and characterized by lengthy negotiations. Indeed, especially in the last decade, many European countries have experienced unusually long cabinet bargaining phases, for instance Belgium in 2010 and 2019, Bosnia Herzegovina in 2010 and 2018, Croatia in 2015, Czech Republic in 2006, Germany in 2017, Ireland in 2020, Italy in 2018, North Macedonia in 2016, Netherlands in 2017, Norway in 2017, Spain in 2016 (and 2015), Sweden in 2018 and UK in 2018. Typically, long delays appear when a parliament is fragmented and a clear majority is missing: parties have to enter multiple bargainings with each other in order to form a coalition able to win a parliamentary confdence vote.
    [Show full text]
  • Università Degli Studi Di Milano Graduate School in Social and Political Sciences Department of Social and Political Sciences Ph.D
    UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI MILANO GRADUATE SCHOOL IN SOCIAL AND POLITICAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND POLITICAL SCIENCES PH.D. PROGRAM IN POLITICAL STUDIES - XXVIII COHORT PH.D. DISSERTATION THE COUNCIL OF STATE AS A POLITICAL ACTOR. ORIGINS AND STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS OF THE CONTROL ON ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS DISCIPLINARY SCIENTIFIC SECTOR: SPS/04 TUTOR: PH.D. CANDIDATE: PROF. FRANCESCO ZUCCHINI ELISA REBESSI DIRECTOR: PROF. FRANCESCO ZUCCHINI ACADEMIC YEAR 2015-2016 !1 Index List of tables 6 List of figures 7 Introduction 9 1. Origins and main developments of the Councils of State in the European countries 14 1.1 Origins of the consultative function of the Councils of State 14 1.1.1 Origins of the French Conseil d'Etat 15 1.1.2 The Council of State of Emperor Charles V: the Spanish Consejo de Estado 17 1.1.3 Charles V and the Low Countries’ Raad van State 18 1.1.4 Origins of the Greek Council of State (Συµβουλιο της Επικρατειας) 20 1.1.5 “Consilium nobiscum residens”. Origins of the Council of State of Italy 21 1.2 Origins of the judicial function of the Councils of State 24 1.2.1 The Conseil d'Etat as the evolution of the “administrator-judge” in France 26 1.2.2 The development of administrative justice in Italy: between pre-unitarian judicial traditions and the transposition of the French model 27 1.2.3 The foundation of the Council of State in independent Belgium 30 1.2.4 Begin and end of the judicial function of the Council of State of Luxembourg 31 1.2.5 The development of the judicial function of the Raad van State 32 1.2.6 The development of the judicial function of the Council of State of Greece: the supreme administrative court as a guardian of the rule of law 33 !2 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Democratic Party of Matteo Renzi
    The Democratic Party of Matteo Renzi Mattia Guidi Department of Political Science, LUISS Guido Carli, Rome The rise of Matteo Renzi, who became prime minister in February, is certainly the most significant political event of this year. His election as leader of the Democratic Party (Dp) in December 2013 “shook” and rapidly transformed the Italian political environment. Renzi’s action has affected various aspects of Italian politics: the nature and the platform of the Dp, the relationship between Italy and the other European countries, and the strength and reform capacity of the executive. Although it is still too early to draw conclusions about the long-term impact of Matteo Renzi’s leadership (in the Dp and in the country in general), it is possible to map the main novelties that he introduced and their main short- and medium-term implications. This chapter will analyse the impact of Renzi’s action on the Dp looking at both its internal organization and its activity and position in the party system. Although the study will seek to distinguish the party from its leader, it is evident that Renzi’s leadership has fundamentally changed the way in which the Dp discusses, decides and acts. Much more than in the past, the party has come to identify with its leader, even more since Renzi has become prime minister. It is therefore crucial to assess if Renzi is introducing structural changes in the Dp and in the party system. The remainder of this chapter proceeds as follows. First, it analyses how Renzi has seized the party and how he is steering it.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Steps Forward and One Step Back: the Majority Principle in the Italian Parliament Since 1994
    Two steps forward and one step back: the majority principle in the Italian Parliament since 1994. Federico Russo, University of Siena [email protected] ABSTRACT Since the early nineties political actors, journalists and scholars are describing the evolution of the parliamentary arena to spot sings of adaptation to the majority logic that characterize the electoral arena. However, this process has been slow and discontinuous, because some of the consensual practices dominating the parliamentary arena have proved to be extremely resilient. The hung parliament resulting from the 2013 general election, with the emergence of the Five Stars Movement as a significant third electoral pole, has questioned the same applicability of the transition framework and terminology. This paper analyses the evolution of the main aspects of parliamentary politics in the last two decades, with special emphasis to the starting months of the XVII legislature. In particular fragmentation of the parliamentary arena and the character of the government formation process are analysed. Finally, this paper provides an assessment of the majority and consensual features of the Italian Parliament after two decades from the collapse of the post-war party system. Paper prepared for the SISP annual conference, University of Perugia/University for foreigners of Perugia, 11-13 September 2014. 1 Introduction The purpose of this paper is to analyze the changes that have been affecting Italian parliamentary politics in the last two decades, or more precisely in the twenty years following Tangentopoli and the collapse of the old party system. Between the end of the eighties and the beginning of the nineties several social and political forces advocated the demise of the proportional electoral system, in the belief that several problems of the country depended on its consociative features.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Fiscal Policy Announcements by the Italian Government on the Sovereign Spread: a Comparative Analysis
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Falagiarda, Matteo; Gregori, Wildmer Daniel Working Paper The impact of fiscal policy announcements by the Italian government on the sovereign spread: a comparative analysis ECB Working Paper, No. 1782 Provided in Cooperation with: European Central Bank (ECB) Suggested Citation: Falagiarda, Matteo; Gregori, Wildmer Daniel (2015) : The impact of fiscal policy announcements by the Italian government on the sovereign spread: a comparative analysis, ECB Working Paper, No. 1782, ISBN 978-92-899-1595-3, European Central Bank (ECB), Frankfurt a. M. This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/154215 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available
    [Show full text]