[ 1982 ] Part 1 Sec 1 Chapter 7 Americas

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

[ 1982 ] Part 1 Sec 1 Chapter 7 Americas 364 Political and security questions Chapter VII Americas Contents Page Page Peace and security in Central America and the Two hundredth anniversary of the birth of Caribbean area . 364 Simón Bolivar 375 Other questions involving Nicaragua ........... 372 General Assembly decision 37/443 ........ 375 Costa Rica and Nicaragua ................. 372 Honduras, Nicaragua and the United States. 372 Guyana and Venezuela........................ 374 Anniversary observances 375 Related topics: Five hundredth anniversary of the discovery of Regional economic and social activities: Latin America. America 375 Human rights violations: Latin America. Other colonial territo- General Assembly decision 37/451 375 ries: Status of the Falkland Islands (Malvinas). cumstances under which it was not compelled to Peace and security in Central take strict measures for defence and survival, the America and the Caribbean area document stated, Nicaragua would hold elections not later than 1985.(5) Honduras transmitted, in a letter of 23 March United Nations consideration in 1982 of peace to the Secretary-General, the main part of a state- and security matters in the Americas focused on ment made that day by its Minister of External tensions involving several States in Central Relations before the Permanent Council of the Or- America and the Caribbean. Letters from those ganization of American States (OAS), containing States to the Security Council and the Secretary- a six-point plan that called for agreements on General described situations primarily affecting general disarmament in the region, reduction in Costa Rica, Honduras, Nicaragua and the United the number of foreign military and other advisers, States. At the request of Nicaragua, the Security international supervision and monitoring mechan- Council convened in March/April to discuss a isms to verify compliance with international com- complaint against the United States, but because mitments, measures to halt arms traffic, respect of a negative vote by the United States it did not for delimited and demarcated borders, and the adopt a resolution. framework for a permanent multilateral dialogue to create an internal climate that would strengthen Communications. Nicaragua transmitted to (3) the Secretary-General on 8 February the text of democracy and respect for freedom. a note of 7 February by its Minister for Foreign Referring to what it described as the worsening Affairs questioning the motives behind the estab- tension in Central America and the increasing lishment of the Central American Democratic danger of large-scale military intervention by the Community, comprising Costa Rica, El Salvador United States, Nicaragua requested an urgent and Honduras, which Nicaragua said was aimed meeting of the Security Council. The request was at isolating other countries in the region.(4) In a contained in a letter of 18 March from the Co- letter of 24 February, Nicaragua transmitted to the ordinator of Nicaragua’s Governing Junta annexed Secretary-General a peace proposal for the Cen- to a 19 March letter to the Secretary-General; the tral American area presented on 21 February by Co-ordinator reported the blowing-up of two the Co-ordinator of the Governing Junta of Na- bridges on 15 March by terrorists operating from tional Reconstruction of Nicaragua, stressing the Honduras, attacks by Honduran and Salvadorian need for non-alignment, non-aggression and vessels on 15 and 17 March against two mutual security agreements with Nicaragua’s Nicaraguan boats in Nicaraguan waters, and a 9 neighbours, delimitation and joint patrolling of its March press conference at which United States frontiers, and talks with the United States for the officials displayed aerial photographs of an alleged negotiated settlement of disputes and the develop- arms build-up in Nicaragua-shown, the C O - ment of regional economic co-operation; given cir- ordinator said, with the goal of convincing the Americas 366 public that Nicaragua was threatening the intervention(8) and 1966 on non-use of force in in- peace.(6) ternational relations;(9) it regarded those resolu- In a letter of 25 March to the Council Presi- tions as inconsistent with international law and the dent, El Salvador contended that the international Charter, and added that their subjects were cov- problems and disputes in Latin America, and par- ered in the 1970 Declaration on Principles of In- ticularly in Central America, should be solved ternational Law concerning Friendly Relations through recourse to the inter-American system and and Co-operation among States in accordance (10) that Nicaragua should follow El Salvador’s exam- with the Charter of the United Nations. Zaire ple in upholding the principle of non-interference said the draft resolution seemed to reject the ap- in the internal affairs of States.(2) In a letter of 30 proach to settling disputes, outlined in the Charter, March to the Council President, Nicaragua cited that parties should first seek solutions by negotia- articles of the Charter of the United Nations to tion and through regional agencies or ar- support its position that it had the right to bring rangements. its complaint before the Security Council, which The Security Council invited the representatives was a means of protection for all Member States of Algeria, Angola, Argentina, Benin, Chile, threatened by imminent attack, the choice between Colombia, the Congo, Costa Rica, Cuba, El Sal- the Council and a regional agency, it said, was an vador, the German Democratic Republic, inalienable right of any Member State.(7) Grenada, Honduras, India, Iran, Iraq, the Lao Security Council consideration. The Security People’s Democratic Republic, the Libyan Arab Council met eight times between 25 March and Jamahiriya, Madagascar, Mauritius, Mexico, 2 April to consider Nicaragua’s complaint. On 2 Mozambique, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Seychelles, Sri April, because of the negative vote of a permanent Lanka, the Syrian Arab Republic, the United member, the Council failed to adopt a draft reso- Republic of Tanzania, Viet Nam, Yugoslavia, lution sponsored by Guyana and Panama.(1) The Zambia and Zimbabwe, at their request, to par- vote was 12 to 1, with 2 abstentions, as follows: ticipate without vote in the discussion. Debate on the item focused on Nicaragua’s com- In favour: China, France, Guyana, Ireland, Japan, plaint against the United States and on the lat- Jordan, Panama, Poland, Spain, Togo, Uganda, USSR. ter’s response, the effect of tensions on the Cen- tral American and Caribbean region and the Against: United States. Abstaining: United Kingdom, Zaire. general situation there. Most States emphasized the need for peaceful solutions based on negotia- By this draft, the Council, reminding Member tion and respect for the principles of non- States of their obligations under the United Na- intervention and the territorial integrity of States. tions Charter, would have appealed to them to Several States, including Honduras, Mexico, refrain from the direct, indirect, overt or covert Nicaragua, Panama and the United States, offered use of force against any Central American or peace proposals. Caribbean country. It would have appealed to all All speakers referred to the tensions between parties to pursue dialogue and negotiation and Nicaragua and the United States. called on all Members to support the search for The Co-ordinator of the Governing Junta of Na- a peaceful solution to that region’s problems. The tional Reconstruction of Nicaragua, Daniel Ortega Secretary-General would have been requested to Saavedra, citing what he called a history of United keep the Council informed of the development of States backing of anti-popular Governments in his the situation in the region. country, said the United States had recently been Guyana, introducing the draft resolution, said training and arming counter-revolutionary forces it did not seek to blame any party for the crisis; in the United States and Honduras and had sent it merely sought to crystallize the call made by aircraft to conduct espionage in Nicaraguan air- many delegations in the Council-to bring all par- space, and its Central Intelligence Agency had par- ties to the negotiating table. ticipated in covert actions against Nicaragua such Explaining its negative vote, the United States as the recent demolition of bridges. Calling for a said it did not feel that the draft resolution sup- halt to such acts, he stated that Nicaragua was will- ported the United Nations, the Security Council ing to improve relations with the United States on or the inter-American system for resolving disputes the basis of mutual respect and unconditional among member States, and did not identify key recognition of its right to self-determination, and elements of the problem of Central and South was also willing immediately to begin talks with America created by Nicaragua’s intervention in the the United States Government to reach concrete affairs of neighbouring States. results, but it would reject any United States at- The United Kingdom said it could not support tempt to impose humiliating restrictions on its in- the draft resolution because of references to violable and sovereign prerogatives regarding na- General Assembly resolutions of 1965 on non- tional defence. 366 Political and security questions The United States said the Nicaraguan charges dence cited with regard to Nicaragua’s involve- reflected behaviour of which Nicaragua was ment in the civil war in El Salvador and its inter- guilty-large-scale intervention
Recommended publications
  • Current Illicit Activities of the Armed Forces in Central America Kristina Mani, Ph.D
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons Western Hemisphere Security Analysis Center College of Arts, Sciences & Education 9-2011 Beyond the Pay: Current Illicit Activities of the Armed Forces in Central America Kristina Mani, Ph.D. Oberlin College Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/whemsac Recommended Citation Mani, Ph.D., Kristina, "Beyond the Pay: Current Illicit Activities of the Armed Forces in Central America" (2011). Western Hemisphere Security Analysis Center. 44. http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/whemsac/44 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts, Sciences & Education at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western Hemisphere Security Analysis Center by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Beyond the Pay: Current Illicit Activities of the Armed Forces in Central America Kristina Mani, Ph. D. Oberlin College September 2011 Beyond the Pay: Current Illicit Activities of the Armed Forces in Central America Kristina Mani, Ph. D. Oberlin College September 2011 The views expressed in this research paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the US Government, Department of Defense, US Southern Command or Florida International University. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The growth of criminal gangs and organized crime groups has created unprecedented challenges in Central America. Homicide rates are among the highest in the world, countries spend on average close to 10 percent of GDP to respond to the challenges of public insecurity, and the security forces are frequently overwhelmed and at times coopted by the criminal groups they are increasingly tasked to counter.
    [Show full text]
  • Affairs | Intelligence the Foreign Area Officer Association Journal of International VOLUME XVII // NUMBER 3 // WINTER 2014 Affairs
    Security Cooperation |Politico-Military Affairs | Intelligence the foreign area officer association journal of INTERNATIONAL VOLUME XVII // NUMBER 3 // WINTER 2014 AFFAIRS WWW.FAOA.ORG 09 China’s Air Force Foreign Relations Program 14 Why Nagorno- Karabakh Mediation Failed 19 Leveraging the National Guard State Partnership Program 24 The Importance of Being Azerbaijan 27 Security Assistance in Iraq, 2013-2014 36 Rebalance to Asia, Reality Check 38 The Peru-Chile Maritime Border 05 BG (Ret) Ismael Alsodani, 46 Security former Iraqi Attaché Cooperation across to the United COCOMs States, advises FAOs on countering the ISIS Narrative SPONSORS & PARTNERS FAOA would like to thank its corporate members and partners who make it possible to serve the Foreign Area Officer community. To become a FAOA sponsor, please contact [email protected] 2 The FAOA Journal of International Affairs www.faoa.org 3 the foreign area officer association journal of INTERNATIONAL Politico-Military Affairs | Intelligence | Security Cooperation Volume XVII, Edition Number 3 — Winter 2014 WWW.FAOA.ORG AFFAIRS INSIDE ISSN 1551-8094 04 | Letter from the Editor The Foreign Area Officer Association Journal of Inter- national Affairs is a non-profit publication for Regional 05 | Islamic State Organization, the Rising, Impact, and the and International Affairs professionals. The views Degradation Strategy, Brigadier General Ismael Alsodani, Iraqi expressed are those of the authors, not of the Depart- ment of Defense, the Armed services or any DoD Army (retired) agency, and are intended to advance the profession through professional and academic dialog. 09 | China’s Air Force Foreign Relations Program and Implications for Interaction with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicaragua: Where Is the Rebellion Going?
    Nicaragua: Where Is The Rebellion Going? The popular rebellion against the dictatorial government of Daniel Ortega, four-time president of Nicaragua, has been going on now for more than a month. And the Ortega government has continued its violent repression. In the last 47 days, it is reported that 104 people have been killed, while some have been arrested or tortured and others have gone missing. In one of the most atrocious events, government snipers fired on the May 30 “Mothers March” led by mothers mourning the murder of their children. Fifteen marchers were killed and scores wounded. While students throughout the country have played the leading role in the rebellion, farmers, environmentalists, and women’s organizations have also been involved. Protest marches by the Nicaraguan people demanding “Peace and Justice”—defined as an end to government violence against the students and the resignation of Ortega—have reached huge proportions, from tens of thousands on numerous occasions to some 500,000—the largest demonstration in Central American history—for the Mothers March. Several groups have now taken up the call for a paro, a national civic strike. As I have explained in my book What Went Wrong? The Nicaraguan Revolution: A Marxist Analysis (summarized in a recent article), Daniel Ortega began forming alliances with the Nicaraguan business class and with conservative and corrupt politicians after he was voted out of power in 1990. He formed alliance with rightwing governments and eventually succeeded in returning to power as president. Over the next nearly thirty years he became a dictator, making his wife his vice- president and controlling all branches of the government.
    [Show full text]
  • CASE CONCERNING Mllitary and PARAMILITARY ACTIVITIES in and AGAINST NICARAGUA ' (NICARAGUA V
    INTERNATIONAL COUKT OF JUSTICE PLEADINGS, ORAL ARGUMENTS. DOCUMENTS CASE CONCERNING MlLITARY AND PARAMILITARY ACTIVITIES IN AND AGAINST NICARAGUA ' (NICARAGUA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA) l 1 VOLUME 1 COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTlCE MÉMOIRES, PLAIDOIRIES ET DOCUMENTS AFFAIRE DES ACTIVITÉS MILITAIRES ET PARAMILITAIRES AU NICARAGUA ET CONTRE CELUI-CI (NICARAGUA c. ÉTATS-UNIS D'AMERJQUE) VOLUME 1 ORAL ARGUMENTS ON THE REQUEST FOR THE INDICATION OF PROVISIONAL MEASURES MlNUTES OF THE PUBLIC SlTTINGS iield ut ~hePeace Palace. The Hurur?, on 22 und27 ApriI and 10 May 1984. President Elrus presiding PLAIDOIRIES RELATIVES À LA DEMANDE EN INDICATION DE MESURES CONSERVATOIRES PROCÈS-VERBAUX DES AUDIENCES PUBLIQUES tenues au Pidan de !lu Pl~ix,ù IA Huyc, les 25 et 27 avril er k 10 mui 1984, sous Ea présiden~ede M. Elias, Prbident FI RST PUBLIC SITTING (25 IV 84,10 a m.) H.E. Mr. Carlos Argüello Gbmez, Ambassador, as Agent and Counscl; Mr. lan Brownlie, Q.C., F.R.A., Chichelc Professor of Public International Law in the University of Oxford; Fellow of All Souls Collcge, Oxford, Hon. Abram Chayes, Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law, Harvard Law School; Fellow, Amcrican Academy of Arts and Sciences, as Lomsel and Advt)catcs ; Mr. Augusto Zamora Rodriguez, Mr. Paul S. Reichler, Miss Judith C. Appdbaum, Mr. Paul W. Kahn, as Counsel. For lhe Gr)irernmrnt of the United States of America Hon. Davis R. Robinson, Legal Adviser, United States Department of State, as Agent unil Colinscl; Ms. Daniel W. McGovern, Principal Dcputy Legal Adviser, United States Department of State, us /Deputy-dgen~and Counsel; Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial of the Government of Nicaragua
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE TERRITORIAL AND MARITIME DISPUTE (NICARAGUA v. COLOMBIA) MEMORIAL OF THE GOVERNMENT OF NICARAGUA VOLUME I 28 APRIL 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 1 PART I:THE ISSUE OF SOVEREIGNTY............................................... 13 CHAPTER I:THE MOSQUITO COAST AND ADJACENT ISLANDS THE UTI POSSIDETIS IURIS AS A NORMATIVE PRINCIPLE........... 15 I. Introduction ......................................................................................15 II. Preliminary Observations................................................................16 A. THE MOSQUITO COAST AND ITS ISLANDS ........................................16 B. THE ORIGIN OF THE DISPUTE OVER THE MOSQUITO COAST..............18 C. APPLICATION OF THE UTI POSSIDETIS IURIS TO THE SETTLEMENT OF THE DISPUTE: THE MOLINA-GUAL TREATY OF 15 MARCH 1825..........20 III. Consideration of the Titles.............................................................25 A. THE TITLES OF THE PARTIES BEFORE THE ROYAL ORDER OF 20 NOVEMBER 1803 ...............................................................................25 B. THE ROYAL ORDER OF 20 NOVEMBER 1803: POSITIONS..................29 C. THE ROYAL ORDER OF 20 NOVEMBER 1803 DID NOT IMPLY A TRANSFER OF TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF THE MOSQUITO COAST TO THE VICEROYALTY OF SANTA FE .........................................................31 D. THE NON-EXECUTION AND POSTPONEMENT OF THE ROYAL ORDER OF 1803 .................................................................................................35
    [Show full text]
  • ALLEGED VIOLATIONS of SOVEREIGN RIGHTS and MARITIME SPACES in the CARIBBEAN SEA (NICARAGUA V
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF SOVEREIGN RIGHTS AND MARITIME SPACES IN THE CARIBBEAN SEA (NICARAGUA v. COLOMBIA) PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS JUDGMENT OF 17 MARCH 2016 2016 COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE RECUEIL DES ARRÊTS, AVIS CONSULTATIFS ET ORDONNANCES VIOLATIONS ALLÉGUÉES DE DROITS SOUVERAINS ET D’ESPACES MARITIMES DANS LA MER DES CARAÏBES (NICARAGUA c. COLOMBIE) EXCEPTIONS PRÉLIMINAIRES ARRÊT DU 17 MARS 2016 6 CIJ1092.indb 1 15/02/17 08:34 Official citation : Alleged Violations of Sovereign Rights and Maritime Spaces in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Colombia), Preliminary Objections, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2016, p. 3 Mode officiel de citation : Violations alléguées de droits souverains et d’espaces maritimes dans la mer des Caraïbes (Nicaragua c. Colombie), exceptions préliminaires, arrêt, C.I.J. Recueil 2016, p. 3 Sales number ISSN 0074-4441 No de vente: 1092 ISBN 978-92-1-157287-2 6 CIJ1092.indb 2 15/02/17 08:34 17 MARCH 2016 JUDGMENT ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF SOVEREIGN RIGHTS AND MARITIME SPACES IN THE CARIBBEAN SEA (NICARAGUA v. COLOMBIA) PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS VIOLATIONS ALLÉGUÉES DE DROITS SOUVERAINS ET D’ESPACES MARITIMES DANS LA MER DES CARAÏBES (NICARAGUA c. COLOMBIE) EXCEPTIONS PRÉLIMINAIRES 17 MARS 2016 ARRÊT 6 CIJ1092.indb 3 15/02/17 08:34 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Paragraphs Chronology of the Procedure 1-14 I. Introduction 15-19 II. First Preliminary Objection 20-48 III. Second Preliminary Objection 49-79 IV. Third Preliminary Objection 80-101 V. Fourth Preliminary Objection 102-104 VI. Fifth Preliminary Objection 105-110 Operative Clause 111 4 6 CIJ1092.indb 4 15/02/17 08:34 4 INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE YEAR 2016 2016 17 March General List 17 March 2016 No.
    [Show full text]
  • Dispute Narratives – MID 3.0 Dataset Correlates of War 2 Project
    Dispute Narratives – MID 3.0 dataset Correlates of War 2 project http://cow2.la.psu.edu March 25, 2004 MID Number Story 3551 In response to Yugoslav involvement in Bosnian civil war, Western countries first showed force and then began a blockade against Yugoslavia. On 7/16/1992 there was a show of force by USA, UK, France, Germany, Greece, Turkey, Spain and Italy. The blockaded against Yugoslavia commences on 11/22/1992 with Belgium joining the states mentioned above. Netherlands joins the MID due to its assistance to the US and France by enforcing a No-Fly zone over Yugoslavia on 4/12/1339. End date is the end date of the Blockade 3555 This MID is the fighting between Yugoslavia and Croatia in Bosnia at the Bosnian and Croatian border. Eventually, the tensions and fighting eased as both turned their attention to Bosnia. 3556 The battle between Bosnia and Croatia (who had been allies) began with a dispute over a gas station. 3557 This MID occurred in Bosnia as Yugoslav and Bosnian forces fought for control of Bosnian territory. Eventually, Yugoslavia bowed to international pressure and withdrew most of its troops from Bosnia. As that happened the bulk of the fighting turned to the militias, i.e. the Bosnian Serbs versus Bosnia. Since the Bosnian Serbs are not state actors their fights with Bosnia do not enter into this MID. 4001 Twenty-two out of the twenty-five incidents in this dispute involve border area interactions between Thai and Cambodian troops. Cambodian troops engage Khmer Rouge guerillas on the border and shells land in Thailand, prompting return shelling by Thai forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Sixteenth International Seapower Symposium: Report of the Proceedings
    U.S. Naval War College U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons International Seapower Symposium Events 10-2003 Sixteenth International Seapower Symposium: Report of the Proceedings The U.S. Naval War College Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/iss Recommended Citation Naval War College, The U.S., "Sixteenth International Seapower Symposium: Report of the Proceedings" (2003). International Seapower Symposium. 1. https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/iss/1 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Events at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Seapower Symposium by an authorized administrator of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SIXTEENTH INTERNATIONAL SEAPOWER SYMPOSIUM Report of the Proceedings Layout for rows 1 and 2: 47 45 43 41 39 37 35 33 31 29 27 25 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 2321191715131197531US 246810121416182022 CNO 1 Kuwait MG Ahmad Y. Al Mulla 2 Panama GEN Jose Antonio Isaza Ros 3 Albania RADM Kudret Celaj 4 Bangladesh RADM Shah Iqbal Mujtaba 5 New Zealand RADM Peter M. McHaffie 6 Sweden RADM Jörgen Eriksson 7 South Africa VADM Johan F. Retief 8 Sri Lanka VADM Daya W. K. Sandagiri 9 Israel VADM Yedidia Ya’ari 10 Italy ADM Marcello de Donno 11 Ghana RADM John Kodzo Gbena 12 Nigeria VADM Samuel Afolayan 13 Chile ADM Miguel Vergara 14 Canada VADM Ronald S. Buck 15 Uruguay ADM Carlos Giani 16 Peru ADM Ricardo Arbocco 17 Romania RADM Victor Blidea 18 Kenya MG P.
    [Show full text]