DOCSLIB.ORG

History Is So Boring!

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
History Is So Boring! The Gest of Robyn Hode, taken from Dobson, R. B. and Taylor, J. (1976) Rhymes of Robyn Hood: An Introduction to the English Outlaw p.79 This is a short extract, as the poem lasts for a few hundred stanzas. The poem is known to have been published in the late C15th, but Holt dates it as early as 1450 as a complete work and earlier as separate tales which were later joined together into the one extended story. Robin Hood and the Potter, Again, a short extract due to the length of the original. Taken from Holt, J. C. (1982) Robin Hood p.35 Here you can see that though Holt has already ‘translated’ the extract into more modern English, this would still be hard for most of our year 7s to understand. I tend to choose a short original to work out as a class, giving the students a chance to try their hand at understanding it. However, the majority of extracts I have rewritten in more year 7 friendly language. Robin Hood and the Potter, like the Gest, is hard to date exactly, but Holt again dates it to around the mid C15th in its written form. Robin Hood lesson two resources: A Gest of Robyn Hode, extract 1: I’m going to tell you about a good yeoman, Robin Hood, He was the most courteous of all outlaws. Robin was leaning against a tree in Barnsdale wood, Little John, another good yeoman, was with him, So was Scarlet and Much the Miller’s son. Everyday, before Robin ate dinner, he would hear three masses, One for God the Father, one for the Holy Spirit and one for Our Lady Mary. He loved Our Lady Mary the most, and never harmed anyone who was travelling with a woman. Think about: What sort of person was Robin Hood? Who were his friends? What did he do every day? What did he never do? A Gest of Robyn Hode, extract 2: Little John asked Robin to tell them who they could rob and who they should leave alone, Robin said “You must not harm any husband [small farmer or peasant] who is ploughing the land, Nor any good yeoman who walks in the green wood, Nor any knight or squire who is a good fellow. These Bishops and Archbishops you shall beat and bind, The high sheriff of Nottingham you shall hold him in your mind.” Think about: Why does Little John ask Robin to tell him what to do? What sort of people does Robin protect? What sort of people does Robin harm? Why might this be? (These are my ‘translations’ of the Gest taken from Dobson and Taylor (1976)) Robin Hood lesson two resources: Robin Hood and the Potter, written down in about 1450 Robin Hood meets a Potter walking through the woods, he asks him for a toll [payment for using a path] for walking in his wood, the Potter refuses. Robin Hood and the Potter fight, and the Potter wins! Robin asks the Potter to stay with them in the woods. The Potter agrees. Next, Robin asks the Potter to swap clothes with him, he will go to Nottingham, disguised as the Potter, to sell his pots. Little John does not want him to go, he says: “Master, beware of the Sherriff of Nottingham, he is not friendly towards us.” But Robin ignores Little John and saying he will have the help of Our Lady, rides off to Nottingham. In Nottingham Robin sets up a stall in the market and starts to sell the pots for much less than they were worth. He quickly sells most of the pots. When he has five pots left, he sends them as a present to the Sherriff’s wife. The Sherriff’s wife enjoys her conversation with Robin (who is still dressed up as the Potter) and asks him to come for dinner with the Sherriff. At dinner the Sherriff’s men tell Robin about a shooting match. The next morning they go out to the archery butts. The Sherriff’s men shoot first, and are good, but not as good as Robin. He asks for a bow, is given a weak bow by the Sherriff, but still hits the mark exactly in the centre. He then tells the Sherriff that he knows Robin Hood well, and has a bow in his cart which he was given by Robin Hood. The Sherriff answers: “I swear by the Trinity that I would give one hundred pounds to have that false outlaw [Robin Hood] stood next to me.” The next day they leave for the forest, the Potter [Robin Hood in disguise] has promised to take the Sherriff to meet Robin Hood. When the Sherriff enters the forest his heart is filled with joy at seeing the green leaves on the tree and hearing the birds sing. Robin blows his horn and his men come running. Little John asks if Robin sold his pots, he tells him that he did and that he has brought the Sherriff with him from Nottingham as a source of money for them all. On hearing this the Sherriff regrets having asked to meet Robin and says he would pay one hundred pounds to have stayed in the town and not come to the forest. Robin tells him that he will have to leave his horse and all his other possessions with them, saying: “You came here on a horse, you shall go home on foot” Robin adds that if he did not love the Sherriff’s wife he would not spare the Sherriff’s life. When the Sherriff gets home he tells his wife that he has lost all the gold he took with him to the forest. She laughs and points out that he has paid Robin for all the pots he gave her in the first place. Back in the forest, Robin pays the Potter generously for the pots he took to Nottingham, and says that he will always be welcome in the green wood. “Thus parted Robin Hood, the Sherriff and the Potter, Under the green-wood tree; God have mercy on Robin Hood’s soul, And save all good yeoman.” Think about: Who does Robin Hood treat well in this story? Who does Robin Hood make a fool of? Where is Robin Hood most at home? Where does the Sherriff belong (where does he wish he was)? Who does Robin Hood rely on for help? What is Robin Hood good at? How would you describe Robin Hood’s character? (This is my ‘translation’ of Robin Hood and the Potter, taken from Holt (1982)) Robin Hood lesson two resources: A Gest of Robyn Hode, extract 3: One day, the meal was ready, but Robin Hood said he did not want to eat until he had found an unknown guest, a Baron, a Knight or a Squire, someone who could pay for the best meal. They find a Knight, riding along and looking very sad, they bring him back and they all eat a big dinner. Then Robin Hood asks the Knight to pay for the dinner, as he is a rich knight, and Robin is only a poor yeoman. But the Knight says he has no money, he has had to give all his money to pay bail for his son who killed two men. The Knight owes an Abbott [man high up in the church] £400 and needs to pay it to him that day, or the Abbott will take all his land. Robin feels sorry for the Knight, and asks him what he will do. The knight replies that there is nothing left for it, he must go “over the salty sea” and seek a life elsewhere. Robin asks where the Knight’s friends are, he replies that his friends all abandoned him as soon as they heard he was poor. Robin offers to lend him the money, but wants to know what his security [guarantee that he will pay Robin back] will be. The knight has no friend but God and says so. Robin tells him: “You must find a better security, or you shall not have any money. I have none other, said the Knight, Only Our Dear Lady, She has never failed me.” Robin is happy to take Our Lady [Mary] as the security and lends the Knight the £400. They also give the Knight clothes of every colour, a horse, a new saddle, and some boots. Robin sends Little John with the Knight, to be his servant. Think about: How do Robin and his men treat the Knight? Is the Knight a good or a bad character in the story? Who does Robin trust? (These are my ‘translations’ of the Gest taken from Dobson and Taylor (1976)) Robin Hood lesson two resources: A Gest of Robyn Hode, extract 4: Robin Hood has leant a poor Knight some money, a horse, clothes and Little John as a servant. The Knight is poor because he owes an Abbott [man high up in the church] lots of money... At the Abbey of St Mary in York, the Abbott is celebrating with one of his Monks, it is time for the Knight to pay back his loan and he has not yet come. The Abbott is happy because this means he can get rich from the Knight’s land. The Prior [another church man] tells them to wait as it is still early in the day, but they will not wait: “The Abbott did hold all the justice of England in his hand.” The Knight arrives and kneels down before the Abbott, and the Sherriff who is also there, and begs them to have mercy on him and let him pay later, when he has worked to save the money.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In Defense of Rap Music: Not Just Beats, Rhymes, Sex, and Violence
    In Defense of Rap Music: Not Just Beats, Rhymes, Sex, and Violence THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Arts Degree in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Crystal Joesell Radford, BA Graduate Program in Education The Ohio State University 2011 Thesis Committee: Professor Beverly Gordon, Advisor Professor Adrienne Dixson Copyrighted by Crystal Joesell Radford 2011 Abstract This study critically analyzes rap through an interdisciplinary framework. The study explains rap‟s socio-cultural history and it examines the multi-generational, classed, racialized, and gendered identities in rap. Rap music grew out of hip-hop culture, which has – in part – earned it a garnering of criticism of being too “violent,” “sexist,” and “noisy.” This criticism became especially pronounced with the emergence of the rap subgenre dubbed “gangsta rap” in the 1990s, which is particularly known for its sexist and violent content. Rap music, which captures the spirit of hip-hop culture, evolved in American inner cities in the early 1970s in the South Bronx at the wake of the Civil Rights, Black Nationalist, and Women‟s Liberation movements during a new technological revolution. During the 1970s and 80s, a series of sociopolitical conscious raps were launched, as young people of color found a cathartic means of expression by which to describe the conditions of the inner-city – a space largely constructed by those in power. Rap thrived under poverty, police repression, social policy, class, and gender relations (Baker, 1993; Boyd, 1997; Keyes, 2000, 2002; Perkins, 1996; Potter, 1995; Rose, 1994, 2008; Watkins, 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • European Yeomanries: a Non-Immiseration Model of Agrarian Social History, 1350–1800*
    European yeomanries: a non-immiseration model of agrarian social history, 1350–1800* european yeomanries – a non-immiseration model by William W. Hagen Abstract The neo-classical and political economy literatures view the European peasantry’s post-medieval history as one of economic dispossession and legal disability. Here I propose a model of early modern European village history concentrating on the maintenance and reproduction of the self-sufficient family farm. Its proprietors figure as householders only marginally dependent on wage labour and capable of developing their holdings into small-scale engines of market production. European villagers were everywhere subject to seigneurial lordship or landlordism. They were universally subject to rents and taxes, and occupied their farms under widely differing tenures, with varying property rights. Some may think the English word ‘yeoman’ to be non-exportable. Here it signifies not only the politically enfranchised freeman agriculturist but family farmers across Europe (whatever their legal disabilities) living, in good times, in rustic sufficiency, engaged in market production and surplus accumulation in one or another form. The present article offers, in an exploratory spirit, an ideal–typical model. The neo-classical and political economy literatures view the post-medieval European peasantry’s history as one of economic dispossession and legal disability. In this perspective, the beneficiaries of long-term commercialization were landlords and their allies, an emergent rural bourgeoisie. Family farmers and smallholders widely suffered removal from the land or reduction to wage-labourer status. Village communalism dissolved into entrepreneurial atomism, or into class polarization and conflict. East of the Rhine, a semi-feudal neo-serfdom ruled the countryside to the villagers’ cost.
    [Show full text]
  • The Robust Beauty of Improper Linear Models in Decision Making
    The Robust Beauty of Improper Linear Models in Decision Making ROBYN M. DAWES University of Oregon ABSTRACT: Proper linear models are those in which A proper linear model is one in which the predictor variables are given weights in such a way weights given to the predictor variables are chosen that the resulting linear composite optimally predicts in such a way as to optimize the relationship be- some criterion of interest; examples of proper linear tween the prediction and the criterion. Simple models are standard regression analysis, discriminant regression analysis is the most common example function analysis, and ridge regression analysis. Re- of a proper linear model; the predictor variables search summarized in Paul Meehl's book on clinical are weighted in such a way as to maximize the versus statistical prediction—and a plethora of re- search stimulated in part by that book—all indicates correlation between the subsequent weighted com- that when a numerical criterion variable (e.g., graduate posite and the actual criterion. Discriminant grade point average) is to be predicted from numerical function analysis is another example of a proper predictor variables, proper linear models outperform linear model; weights are given to the predictor clinical intuition. Improper linear models are those in variables in such a way that the resulting linear which the weights of the predictor variables are ob- composites maximize the discrepancy between two tained by some nonoptimal method; for example, they or more groups. Ridge regression analysis, an- may be obtained on the basis of intuition, derived other example (Darlington, 1978; Marquardt & from simulating a clinical judge's predictions, or set to Snee, 1975), attempts to assign weights in such be equal.
    [Show full text]
  • Keane, for Allowing Us to Come and Visit with You Today
    BIL KEANE June 28, 1999 Joan Horne and myself, Ann Townsend, interviewers for the Town of Paradise Valley Historical Committee are privileged to interview Bil Keane. Mr. Keane has been a long time resident of the Town of Paradise Valley, but is best known and loved for his cartoon, The Family Circus. Thank you, Mr. Keane, for allowing us to come and visit with you today. May we have your permission to quote you in part or all of our conversation today? Bil Keane: Absolutely, anything you want to quote from it, if it's worthwhile quoting of course, I'm happy to do it. Ann Townsend: Thank you very much. Tell us a little bit about yourself and what brought you to hot Arizona? Bil Keane: Well, it was a TWA plane. I worked on the Philadelphia Bulletin for 15 years after I got out of the army in 1945. It was just before then end of 1958 that I had been bothered each year with allergies. I would sneeze in the summertime and mainly in the spring. Then it got in to be in the fall, then spring, summer and fall. The doctor would always prescribe at that time something that would alleviate it. At the Bulletin I was doing a regular comic and I was editor of their Fun Book. I had a nine to five job there and we lived in Roslyn which was outside Philadelphia and it was one hour and a half commute on the train and subway. I was selling a feature to the newspapers called Channel Chuckles, which was the little cartoon about television which I enjoyed doing.
    [Show full text]
  • Representations of Education in HBO's the Wire, Season 4
    Teacher EducationJames Quarterly, Trier Spring 2010 Representations of Education in HBO’s The Wire, Season 4 By James Trier The Wire is a crime drama that aired for five seasons on the Home Box Of- fice (HBO) cable channel from 2002-2008. The entire series is set in Baltimore, Maryland, and as Kinder (2008) points out, “Each season The Wire shifts focus to a different segment of society: the drug wars, the docks, city politics, education, and the media” (p. 52). The series explores, in Lanahan’s (2008) words, an increasingly brutal and coarse society through the prism of Baltimore, whose postindustrial capitalism has decimated the working-class wage and sharply divided the haves and have-nots. The city’s bloated bureaucracies sustain the inequality. The absence of a decent public-school education or meaningful political reform leaves an unskilled underclass trapped between a rampant illegal drug economy and a vicious “war on drugs.” (p. 24) My main purpose in this article is to introduce season four of The Wire—the “education” season—to readers who have either never seen any of the series, or who have seen some of it but James Trier is an not season four. Specifically, I will attempt to show associate professor in the that season four holds great pedagogical potential for School of Education at academics in education.1 First, though, I will present the University of North examples of the critical acclaim that The Wire received Carolina at Chapel throughout its run, and I will introduce the backgrounds Hill, Chapel Hill, North of the creators and main writers of the series, David Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • Make We Merry More and Less
    G MAKE WE MERRY MORE AND LESS RAY MAKE WE MERRY MORE AND LESS An Anthology of Medieval English Popular Literature An Anthology of Medieval English Popular Literature SELECTED AND INTRODUCED BY DOUGLAS GRAY EDITED BY JANE BLISS Conceived as a companion volume to the well-received Simple Forms: Essays on Medieval M English Popular Literature (2015), Make We Merry More and Less is a comprehensive anthology of popular medieval literature from the twel�h century onwards. Uniquely, the AKE book is divided by genre, allowing readers to make connec�ons between texts usually presented individually. W This anthology offers a frui�ul explora�on of the boundary between literary and popular culture, and showcases an impressive breadth of literature, including songs, drama, and E ballads. Familiar texts such as the visions of Margery Kempe and the Paston family le�ers M are featured alongside lesser-known works, o�en oral. This striking diversity extends to the language: the anthology includes Sco�sh literature and original transla�ons of La�n ERRY and French texts. The illumina�ng introduc�on offers essen�al informa�on that will enhance the reader’s enjoyment of the chosen texts. Each of the chapters is accompanied by a clear summary M explaining the par�cular delights of the literature selected and the ra�onale behind the choices made. An invaluable resource to gain an in-depth understanding of the culture ORE AND of the period, this is essen�al reading for any student or scholar of medieval English literature, and for anyone interested in folklore or popular material of the �me.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mockingbird's Nest
    The Mockingbird’s Nest A Play in One Act by Craig Bailey Craig Bailey 350 Woodbine Rd Shelburne VT 05482-6777 ©2020 Craig Bailey (802) 655-1197 All rights reserved [email protected] CHARACTERS DAISY In her 80s. ROBYN In her 50s. SETTING/TIME Scene 1 A home. Sometime in the future. Scene 2 The same. Decades later. SYNOPSIS Elderly shut-in DAISY begins to suspect her daughter and live-in caregiver, ROBYN, isn't what she seems to be. 1. SCENE 1 (In the darkness, MUSIC plays. It's a music box-like rendition of "Daisy Bell [Bicycle Built for Two].") (AT RISE: The living room of a modest home. ROBYN sits in an easy chair R. DAISY sits in a wheelchair L.) DAISY (Holding a music box and singing.) Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer do. I'm half crazy, all for the love of you. It won't be a stylish marriage, I can't afford a carriage. But you'll look sweet, Upon the seat, Of a bicycle built for two. ROBYN (Clapping.) Bravo! DAISY The girls would sing it to me incessantly. Every day they would sing it to me. Walking to school. Walking home from school. During recess. Under their breath during class. They thought they were tormenting me, but of course they weren't. As a matter of fact, I liked it! They were meant to be teasing me, but I liked the song! Though I never let those girls know. ROBYN It's a beautiful melody. A beautiful name. DAISY Old fashioned, I'm sure.
    [Show full text]
  • Purgatoire Saint Patrice, Short Metrical Chronicle, Fouke Le Fitz Waryn, and King Horn
    ROMANCES COPIED BY THE LUDLOW SCRIBE: PURGATOIRE SAINT PATRICE, SHORT METRICAL CHRONICLE, FOUKE LE FITZ WARYN, AND KING HORN A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Catherine A. Rock May 2008 Dissertation written by Catherine A. Rock B. A., University of Akron, 1981 B. A., University of Akron, 1982 B. M., University of Akron, 1982 M. I. B. S., University of South Carolina, 1988 M. A. Kent State University, 1991 M. A. Kent State University, 1998 Ph. D., Kent State University, 2008 Approved by ___________________________________, Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Susanna Fein ___________________________________, Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Don-John Dugas ___________________________________ Kristen Figg ___________________________________ David Raybin ___________________________________ Isolde Thyret Accepted by ___________________________________, Chair, Department of English Ronald J. Corthell ___________________________________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Jerry Feezel ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS………………………………………………………………viii Chapter I. Introduction .................................................................................................. 1 Significance of the Topic…………………………………………………..2 Survey of the State of the Field……………………………………………5 Manuscript Studies: 13th-14th C. England………………………...5 Scribal Studies: 13th-14th C. England……………………………13 The Ludlow Scribe of Harley 2253……………………………...19 British Library
    [Show full text]
  • Robin Hood the Brute: Representations of The
    Law, Crime and History (2016) 2 ROBIN HOOD THE BRUTE: REPRESENTATIONS OF THE OUTLAW IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY CRIMINAL BIOGRAPHY Stephen Basdeo1 Abstract Eighteenth century criminal biography is a topic that has been explored at length by both crime historians such as Andrea McKenzie and Richard Ward, as well as literary scholars such as Lincoln B. Faller and Hal Gladfelder. Much of these researchers’ work, however, has focused upon the representation of seventeenth and eighteenth century criminals within these narratives. In contrast, this article explores how England’s most famous medieval criminal, Robin Hood, is represented. By giving a commentary upon eighteenth century Robin Hood narratives, this article shows how, at a time of public anxiety surrounding crime, people were less willing to believe in the myth of a good outlaw. Keywords: eighteenth century, criminal biography, Robin Hood, outlaws, Alexander Smith, Charles Johnson, medievalism Introduction Until the 1980s Robin Hood scholarship tended to focus upon the five extant medieval texts such as Robin Hood and the Monk, Robin Hood and the Potter, Robin Hood and Guy of Gisborne, and A Gest of Robyn Hode (c.1450), as well as attempts to identify a historical outlaw.2 It was only with the work of Stephen Knight that scholarship moved away from trying to identify a real outlaw as things took a ‘literary turn’. With Knight’s work also the post- medieval Robin Hood tradition became a significant area of scholarly enquiry. His recent texts have mapped the various influences at work upon successive interpretations of the legend and how it slowly became gentrified and ‘safe’ as successive authors gradually ‘robbed’ Robin of any subversive traits.3 Whilst Knight’s research on Robin Hood is comprehensive, one genre of literature that he has not as yet examined in detail is eighteenth century criminal biography.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chartist Robin Hood: Thomas Miller’S Royston Gower; Or, the Days of King John (1838)
    Studies in Scottish Literature Volume 44 Article 8 Issue 2 Reworking Walter Scott 12-31-2019 The hC artist Robin Hood: Thomas Miller’s Royston Gower; or, The aD ys of King John (1838) Stephen Basdeo Richmond: the American International University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/ssl Part of the Literature in English, British Isles Commons Recommended Citation Basdeo, Stephen (2019) "The hC artist Robin Hood: Thomas Miller’s Royston Gower; or, The aD ys of King John (1838)," Studies in Scottish Literature: Vol. 44: Iss. 2, 72–81. Available at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/ssl/vol44/iss2/8 This Article is brought to you by the Scottish Literature Collections at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Studies in Scottish Literature by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CHARTIST ROBIN HOOD: THOMAS MILLER’S ROYSTON GOWER; OR, THE DAYS OF KING JOHN (1838) Stephen Basdeo Thomas Miller was born in Gainsborough, Lincolnshire in 1807, to a poor family and in his early youth worked as a ploughboy before becoming a shoemaker’s apprentice. He had a limited education, but his mother encouraged him to read on a daily basis.1 In his adult life, he became a professional author. He greatly admired Walter Scott, whom he referred to as “the immortal author of Waverley.”2 Indeed, such was his admiration that it was in emulation of Scott’s Ivanhoe (1819) that Miller authored his own Robin Hood novel titled Royston Gower; or, The Days of King John, published in December 1838.3 Ivanhoe had a profound influence upon the Robin Hood legend.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 Lords, Yeomen, Gentlemen, Merchants, Merchant Adventurers and Mercers
    Chapter 7 Lords, Yeomen, Gentlemen, merchants, Merchant Adventurers and mercers The Chief Lords - Percy and Clifford families The Clifford Papers were found at Skipton Castle, then rescued and are now at the Yorkshire Archaeological Society in Leeds, on loan from the Fattorini family. They include details of land holdings and rents from about 1494 onwards for Craven properties. Transcripts are available on-line atwww.NorthCravenHeritage.org.uk The Chief Lord for Giggleswick parish was Henry Percy, 5th Earl of Northumberland 1478-1527. His daughter Margaret married Henry Lord Clifford (1493-1542) who was the 11th Lord of the Honour of Skipton. He was shortly afterwards created 1st Earl of Cumberland. Margaret or her heir was to inherit the Percy estates in Giggleswick Parish. Henry Percy had already appointed his son-in-law Henry Clifford as Steward to supervise lands around Skipton Castle. The 6th Earl of Northumberland was childless and Giggleswick Parish was given to Henry Clifford in 1536, confirmed by Parliament in 1537. Henry Clifford his son became 12th Lord of Skipton and 2nd Earl of Cumberland, 1517-1569. George was the 13th Lord and 3rd Earl, 1558-1608, and Anne, 1590-1676 was due to inherit. She spent much of her life trying to obtain her proper inheritance from Francis, 4th Earl of Cumberland. (The diaries of Lady Anne Clifford, 1990. D.J.H.Clifford, Publ. Alan Sutton Ltd.). The inhabitants of Langcliffe had to pay entry fines and gressums to the Cliffords as overlords if they held land outside Langcliffe. The wapentake or bailiwick of Staincliffe was a liberty from which the sheriff of Yorkshire and his officers were excluded.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kent Yeoman in the Seventeenth Century
    http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society THE KENT YEOMAN IN THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY JACQUELINE BOWER Mildred Campbell, in the only detailed work so far published on the yeomanry, concluded that the yeoman class emerged in the fifteenth century.1 The yeomen were the free tenants of the manor, usually identified with freeholders of land worth 40s. a year, the medieval franklins. The Black Death of 1348 may have hastened the emergence of the yeomanry. The plague may have killed between one-third and one-half of the total population of England, a loss from which the population did not recover until the second half of the sixteenth century. Landowners were left with vacant farms because tenants had died and no one was willing to take on tenancies or buy land at the high rents and prices common before the Black Death. In a buyer's market, it became impossible for landlords to enforce all the feudal services previously exacted. Land prices fell, and peasant farming families which survived the Black Death and which had a little capital were able, over several generations, to accumulate sizeable estates largely free of labour services. It is taken for granted that yeomen were concerned with agriculture, men who would later come to be described as farmers, ranking between gentry and husbandmen, of some substance and standing in their communities. However, a re-examination of contemporary usages suggests that there was always some uncertainty as to what a yeoman was. William Harrison, describing English social structure in 1577, said that yeomen possessed 'a certain pre-eminence and more estimation' among the common people.
    [Show full text]