St Croix River Bridge Design Cover

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

St Croix River Bridge Design Cover Proposal for: S t . C r o i x C r o s s i n g P r o j e c t April 27, 2012 Final Bridge Design Prepared for: Create Minnesota Department of Transportation Preserve Activate Prepared by: 100 South Fifth Street Suite 1500 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Technical Proposal Technical Technical Proposal St. Croix Crossing Project Final Bridge Design • Perform a review of the bridge deck drainage system along with the hydraulic analysis of the bridges and the entire construction project. Produce final design and details for a bridge drainage system balancing the visual elements of the box girder bridges with the external drainage pipes necessary to convey the drainage. • Deliver final construction plans by May 17, 2013 with a design that is developed to keep the construction cost within the overall project budget. With our previous experience on similar projects, URS is very aware of and confident we will overcome all technical challenges associated with this project. These challenges include: 1) the understanding of complex load paths and force flows within the extradosed structure; 2) the difficulties in constructing large foundations in water; 3) engineering challenges related to the bridge drainage system; and 4) developing a plan set and construction scheme that is economical and bidder-friendly. However, perhaps the most critical challenge to achieving a successful project will be to maintain both budget and schedule while developing all design deliverables. This logistical aspect of the project will require, first and foremost, the experienced and talented project manager we have chosen to guide this team, Steve Stroh, PE, PhD. For this important project URS is making its most experienced bridge manager available. Steve has the distinction of being the Engineer of Record (EOR) of the first Extradosed Prestressed Bridge in the U.S., the Pearl Harbor Memorial Bridge and is also one of URS’ most experienced project managers for complex bridge projects. Steve will be supported by an experienced, committed and dedicated staff that brings unequaled experience in extradosed prestress bridge design and the other necessary expertise to assure a successful outcome for this project. We are excited about this opportunity to help MnDOT with the final design of this very important bridge project. 3. Work Plan and Project Approach and Methodology PROJECT COORDINATION Contract Administration, Management, Schedule: Steve Stroh, PE, PhD, and Mark Maves, PE, will spearhead the efforts of the St. Croix River Crossing project management team. This team brings a balance of local experience with MnDOT and national experience on similar complex bridge projects. Their first task will be the Project Execution Plan, which will be delivered 10 days after the Notice to Proceed (NTP). The Project Execution Plan (PXP), shared with MnDOT, will include an estimated sheet count by number and title and the anticipated percentage complete for particular sheets for each submittal. Additionally they will have worked proactively prior to the NTP to mobilize within URS and our project team, ALL the resources necessary for this challenging project, such that, there is no lag time between the NTP and productive work being accomplished. With upwards of 300 bridge engineers nationwide, and with the support of our nine subconsultants, URS will bring to bear a large group of committed and talented individuals with a common purpose of providing a quality product to MnDOT for the St. Croix River Crossing Project. URS has experience with successfully completing similar large scale “mega project” assignments in a very limited time frame. Examples include, the Kap Shui Mun Bridge in Hong Kong (a major cable stayed bridge designed and constructed in 3 years), and the ROC 52 Design-Build project in Rochester ($240 million reconstruction project designed in one year). The Gantt chart shown on the following page illustrates our proposed design schedule to perform the tasks listed in the RFPs Scope of Work. Our URS experience with the preliminary, final and post design phases of the Pearl Harbor Memorial Bridge, the first extradosed bridge in the United States and of similar complexity to the St. Croix River Bridge Project, provides MnDOT with valuable insights and a minimal learning curve related to extradosed bridge design. The same team leaders for the successful Pearl Harbor Memorial Bridge project: Steve Stroh, Bob Anderson, Velvet Bridges, Richard Beaupre, Ed Bell, Scott Montgomery, and Daniel Mariscal also form the core team for the St. Croix River Crossing Project. Peer Review Coordination: Through our peer review of MnDOT’s Lafayette Segmental Box Girder Design, URS is very familiar with the interface intended between the bridge designer and the peer reviewer. We will accommodate open and effective communication with the peer reviewer and work with them to resolve all comments in a timely manner. We understand the value of this very important Page 2 URS Corporation April 27, 2012 ID Task Name Duration Start Finish June July August September October November December January February March April May June July August Septe E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B 1 Notice to Proceed (Assumed) 0 days Fri 6/1/12 Fri 6/1/12 6/1 2 Kick Off Meeting 0 days Thu 6/7/12 Thu 6/7/12 6/7 3 Design Review Meetings 260 days Sun 7/1/12 Mon 7/1/13 17 Design review teleconferences 240 days Sun 7/15/12 Sat 6/15/13 30 Project Managements Plan 10 days Fri 6/1/12 Thu 6/14/12 31 Document Security Plan 10 days Fri 6/1/12 Thu 6/14/12 32 Design and load rating criteria 10 days Fri 6/1/12 Thu 6/14/12 33 Receive peer review comments 0 days Thu 6/28/12 Thu 6/28/12 6/28 34 Final design and rating criteria 6 days Fri 6/29/12 Fri 7/6/12 35 Baseline P6 CPM 21 days Fri 6/1/12 Fri 6/29/12 36 Precast Vs. Cast-in-place investigation 15 days Fri 6/1/12 Thu 6/21/12 37 Review of Preliminary Plans/Propose Revisions 15 days Fri 6/1/12 Thu 6/21/12 38 CPM Updates 238 days Wed 8/1/12 Mon 7/1/13 51 Drainage Sys. Des. Rev. 1 day? Fri 6/1/12 Fri 6/1/12 52 Project Permits 241 days Mon 7/2/12 Mon 6/3/13 65 Concept Design (30% Plan) 80 days Fri 6/1/12 Thu 9/20/12 66 Concept design 30% Plan 56 days Fri 6/1/12 Fri 8/17/12 67 Quality Control 5 days Mon 8/6/12 Fri 8/10/12 68 Draft Engineers Cost Estimate 10 days Mon 8/6/12 Fri 8/17/12 69 Draft Foundation Recommendations 56 days Fri 6/1/12 Fri 8/17/12 70 Site Specific Wind Report 56 days Fri 6/1/12 Fri 8/17/12 71 Wind tunnel Section Model Study 46 days Fri 6/15/12 Fri 8/17/12 72 Vessel Collision Study 20 days Fri 6/15/12 Thu 7/12/12 73 Corrosion protection plan outline 20 days Mon 7/23/12 Fri 8/17/12 74 Aesthetic Lighting 20 days Fri 6/29/12 Thu 7/26/12 75 Constructibility Workshop 2 days Mon 8/27/12 Tue 8/28/12 76 Receive Peer Review of 30% 0 days Fri 8/31/12 Fri 8/31/12 8/31 77 SHPO Review 24 days Mon 8/20/12 Thu 9/20/12 78 Final 30% Plan 10 days Mon 9/3/12 Fri 9/14/12 79 Public Outreach 0 days Fri 8/24/12 Fri 8/24/12 8/24 80 Final Design (60% Plan) 114 days Mon 8/20/12 Thu 1/24/13 81 Draft Final Design 90 days Mon 8/20/12 Fri 12/21/12 82 Quality Control 5 days Mon 12/10/12 Fri 12/14/12 83 Preliminary Load Rating Results 15 days Mon 12/3/12 Fri 12/21/12 84 Constructibility Review 20 days Mon 11/26/12 Fri 12/21/12 85 Engineers Cost Estimate 10 days Mon 12/10/12 Fri 12/21/12 86 Receive Pile load test results (date TBD) 0 days Fri 9/14/12 Fri 9/14/12 9/14 87 Final Foundation Recommendations 20 days Fri 9/14/12 Thu 10/11/12 88 Redundancy Analysis Report Bridge 82045 30 days Mon 11/12/12 Fri 12/21/12 89 Wind Tunnel Aeroelastic Study 90 days Mon 8/20/12 Fri 12/21/12 90 Stay Vibration Study 60 days Mon 10/1/12 Fri 12/21/12 91 Draft Maintenance on Inspection Manual 30 days Mon 11/12/12 Fri 12/21/12 92 Draft Corrosion Protection Plan 30 days Mon 11/12/12 Fri 12/21/12 93 Contractor Information Meeting 0 days Fri 12/28/12 Fri 12/28/12 12/28 94 Receive comments on Draft Corrosion plan 0 days Fri 1/11/13 Fri 1/11/13 1/11 95 Receive Peer Review 60% 0 days Fri 1/18/13 Fri 1/18/13 1/18 96 Public Outreach 0 days Fri 12/28/12 Fri 12/28/12 12/28 97 SHPO Review 24 days Mon 12/24/12 Thu 1/24/13 98 Final Plan (95% Plan) 94 days Mon 12/24/12 Thu 5/2/13 99 Final Plan 70 days Mon 12/24/12 Fri 3/29/13 100 Quality Control 5 days Mon 3/18/13 Fri 3/22/13 101 Plan Constructibility Review 20 days Mon 3/4/13 Fri 3/29/13 102 Engineers cost estimate 10 days Mon 3/18/13 Fri 3/29/13 103 Final Maintenance an Inspection Manual 20 days Mon 3/4/13 Fri 3/29/13 104 Final corrosion protection plan 20 days Mon 1/14/13 Fri 2/8/13 105 Threat and Vulnerability Assessment 30 days Mon 2/18/13 Fri 3/29/13 106 Receive Peer Review Comments 0 days Fri 4/19/13 Fri 4/19/13 4/19 107 Public Outreach 0 days Fri 4/5/13 Fri 4/5/13 4/5 108 SHPO Review 24 days Mon 4/1/13 Thu 5/2/13 109 Certified Final Plans (100% Plan) 15 days Mon 4/22/13 Fri 5/10/13 110 Certified Final Plan (100%) 15 days Mon 4/22/13 Fri 5/10/13 111 Quality Control 3 days Mon 5/6/13 Wed 5/8/13 112 Cost Estimate Update 10 days Mon 4/29/13 Fri 5/10/13 113 Re-bid Meeting (Date TBD) 0 days Fri 5/24/13 Fri 5/24/13 5/24 114 Rating Manual 109 days Mon 4/1/13 Thu 8/29/13 115 Draft Rating Manual 66 days Mon 4/1/13 Mon 7/1/13 116 Receive Peer Review Comments 23 days Tue 7/2/13 Thu 8/1/13 117 Final Rating Manual (date TBD) 20 days Fri 8/2/13 Thu 8/29/13 118 Maint.
Recommended publications
  • Design and Construction of Extradosed Bridges in Cold Temperature and Seismic Zones
    Design and Construction of Extradosed Bridges in Cold Temperature and Seismic Zones Dr. Matthias Schueller, P.Eng. Vice President Parsons Structures Session 2020 TAC Conference & Exhibition Abstract Extradosed bridges are often described as a cross of a conventional prestressed concrete girder bridge and a traditional cable-stayed bridge because most extradosed bridges built combine a prestressed concrete superstructure with stay-cable technologies. However, this simple definition does not capture the various possible structural systems and different materials that can be found and used for extradosed bridges. Extradosed bridge technology is much more than a prestressed concrete girder with external tendons. The Deh Cho Bridge in the Northwest Territories and the Canal Lachine Bridge in Montréal are two Canadian extradosed bridges featuring steel superstructures with slender composite concrete decks using full-depth precast panels. Although both bridges are very different, they share one important design aspect which governed the design of their superstructures: Both bridges are located in regions with prolonged extreme cold winter periods. Temperatures below 0 °C and cold weather periods lasting up to five months can be a major hindrance when erecting long bridges with conventional concrete superstructures. On the contrary, steel superstructures are light and can be quickly erected, even at cold temperatures without heating and hording given that field welding is avoided. To avoid delays along the critical path in the erection of major superstructures in extreme cold temperature zones, designers should consider erection schemes which make best use of short warm weather periods and reduce negative impacts related to harsh weather conditions as best as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Roads & Bridges November 2012
    BRIDGE DESIGN By Jamie Farris, P.E., Dan Carlson, P.E., and Eric Nelson, P.E. Contributing Authors Proper frame work Waco, TxDOT come up with right solution for IH-35 ruce Jackson, a noted professor of inspirational, in many ways bridges define their surroundings. Needing to expand I-35 American culture, said, “Bridges (IH-35), representatives from the city of Waco B are perhaps the most invisible form wanted signature bridges with an “art deco” look to complement other recent downtown of public architecture; they become frames economic revitalization projects. Because for looking at the world around us.” the frontage road bridges were going to be constructed first—the mainline bridges will be Taking that philosophy out of academia and replaced later—TxDOT and Waco representa- putting it into practice, the Waco District of the tives decided to create signature twin frontage Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) road bridges on each side of the mainline has initiated a unique bridge project spanning bridges. Though aesthetics was certainly a the Brazos River. Though only two frontage driving force behind the new bridge design, the road bridges are involved, the $17.3 million initial defining characteristic of the project was IH-35 Extradosed Bridge Project will pioneer a functional need. bridge technique in the U.S. As part of the American infrastructure, Brazos bravado bridges often become treasured landmarks IH-35 runs north-south through the heart in their communities. Majestic, grand and of Texas. A major transportation artery for the 42 November 2012 • ROADS&BRIDGES Debate rages over the boundary some 60 ft from the corresponding between extradosed and traditional mainline bridges.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction & Design Services
    CONSTRUCTION & DESIGN SERVICES UTTAR PRADESH JAL MGAIVI (A Govt. of U.P.Undertaking) Head Office: TC-38V, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow-226010 HG Ph.: +915222728985 Fax: +91 5222728988 Vlsll us: www. cd su pj n. org e -m ai I : di rector@cd s u pjn. o rg Ref. 2, ..2[.-.8-( I l6f pate./..?. Construction of a Dedicated corridor (4 Lane including Extradosed Bridge across river Ganga) for old, differently abled persons during Kumbh and Magh Mela at Sangam, Allahabad (U.P.) India Replies/Clarifications to the Oueries raised on RFO cum RFP & Bid Documents by various firms in Pre-Bid Meetine flD on dated 25.06.2016 Regarding NIT No. 496|CGM-U Dedi.Coni.All.116 dated 06.04.2016 and subsequent corrigendum issued vide letter no. 556/CGM-IiDedi.Corri.All./16 dated 05.05.2016, a Pre-Bid Meeting (II) was held at Head Quarter of C&DS, UP Jal Nigam, Lucknow on dated 25.06.2016. Some of the firms participating in meeting raised some queries in person as well as through correspondence (electronic or otherwise) regarding the pre-qualification criteria mentioned in RFQ cum RFQ document and draft EPC Agreement. The Bid clarifications and amendments in RFQ cum RFP document and draft EPC agreement are attached herewith. Enclosure: As above. I (A K Rai) Chief General Manager (I) Copy to the following for information and necessarv action nlease:- l. Managing Director, U.P. Jal Nigam, Lucknow with enclosures. 2. Director, C&DS, U.P. Jal Nigam, Lucknow. J. General Manager (Ganga Bridge), C&DS, U.P.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 VI June 2018
    6 VI June 2018 http://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2018.6289 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET) ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 6.887 Volume 6 Issue VI, June 2018- Available at www.ijraset.com Characteristic Study on Cable-Stayed and Extradosed Bridge Rohini R. Kavathekar1, Dr. N.K.Patil2 1Student of P.G., M.E. Civil,-Structure Sanjay Ghodawat Institutions, Atigre, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, India 2 Professor & Head , Civil Engg. Department, Sanjay Ghodawat Institutions, Atigre, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, India Abstract: This paper presents study of cable-stayed bridge and extradosed bridge. For analysis 100m, 150m, 200m, 250m and 300m spans are considered. Extradosed bridge is a novel idea bridge between Girder Bridge and cable-stayed bridge. This paper is concluded with study of various parameters of these types of bridges. The parametric study includes response of deck, deck moment, study of pylon, how the response of bridge varies span wise, from aesthetics point of view feasible bridge structure, pylon height and span length to thickness of girder ratio. The parameters of extradosed bridge are compared with cable-stayed bridge. Keywords: CSI Bridge, cable-stayed bridge, extradosed bridge, bending moment, shear force, pylon height, girder depth, aesthetic view. I. INTRODUCTION During XIX century, one of the most relevant contributions to bridge engineering has been the introduction of prestressed technique, which is a solution to the need of controlling stress on elements in bridges. Initially this technique was employed by means of internal and external prestressed tendons, until 1925 when modern cable-stayed bridges appeared –the Tempul Aqueduct, which was developed and built by Eduardo Torroja (Torroja, 1927).
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on Comparative Study Between Girder Bridge and Extradosed Bridge by Using Staad.Pro Software
    International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 06 Issue: 11 | Nov 2019 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 A Review on Comparative Study between Girder Bridge and Extradosed Bridge by using Staad.pro Software Aware Satish1, Gaidhankar Karan2, Kale Vaishnavi3, Fulari Kedar4, Arab Abubakar5 1Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, N. B. Navale Sinhgad College of Engineering, Solapur, India 2,3,4,5Student, Department of Civil Engineering, N. B. Navale Sinhgad College of Engineering, Solapur, India ---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract - Extra dosed bridges are similar to cable stayed 1.1 Stability bridges. The stay cables are used for strengthening. This new type of bridges has been constructed in Japan. This concept is Stability of cable stayed bridges have been carries out introduced by J.Mathivat. This paper shows some example and many researchers .SHU and WANG investigated the stability difference between Extra dosed and cable stayed bridges in characteristics of cable stayed bridge by studying 3 structural aspects. The structural behavior of Extra dosed dimensional finite elements method. They contain design bridge differs from that of cable stayed bridge. The paper parameters such as main span length, cable arrangement, shows the free vibration and forced vibration behavior of types of pylon. The excessively large buckling length in some Extra dosed bridge. girders members can be minimized by introducing concept of fictitious, axial force to obtain buckling length of steel girder There are various types of girder bridges like box- members in cable stayed bridges. girder, plate girder, I-beam, T-beam etc. Plate girder bridges are the most common type of steel bridges generally used for 1.2 Safety Factors railway crossing of streams and rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Extradosed/Cable-Stayed
    CHAPTER 6: ENGINEERING CONCEPTS Image 6.5: Extradosed/ Cable Stayed Image 6.6: Extradosed/ Cable Stayed Extradosed/Cable-Stayed Enlargement The extradosed/cable-stayed bridge uses a series of cable-supported spans to cross the river with equal span lengths of approximately 300 feet, as shown in Figure 6.7. The superstructure would be supported by cables above the deck anchored at one end to a central pylon and at the other end to the edge of the deck. The towers or pylons would extend 48 feet above the deck. The deck elements could consist of either steel or concrete edge girders or concrete box girders. With a span length of 300 feet, it is anticipated that variable depth (haunched) girder elements would be practical and would provide optimal aesthetics, as shown in Figures 6.8 and 6.9. Figure 6.9 presents a full build concept that is designed to accommodate the widest cross section in the study, Alternative 8. The towers would consist of concrete elements located on the outside of the deck at the ends of each span. A variety of options are available for the arrangement of the superstructure cables. One advantage of extradosed or cable-stayed construction is that it is possible to perform the construction in a top-down fashion using balanced-cantilever erection. In this scenario, few if any temporary supports would be required in the Potomac River during construction. However, balanced cantilever construction results in significant unbalanced loads on the piers and foundations during construction, potentially resulting in larger and more expensive foundations.
    [Show full text]
  • Document Downloaded From: This Paper Must Be Cited As: the Final
    Document downloaded from: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/140235 This paper must be cited as: Lozano-Galant, JA.; Paya-Zaforteza, I. (2017). Analysis of Eduardo Torroja's Tempul Aqueduct an important precursor of modern cable-stayed bridges, extradosed bridges and prestressed concrete. Engineering Structures. 150:955-968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.057 The final publication is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.057 Copyright Elsevier Additional Information Please cite this paper as: Analysis of Eduardo Torroja’sTempul Aqueduct an important precursor of modern cable-stayed bridges, extradosed bridges and prestressed concrete Engineering Structures, 2011, 150: 955-968. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.05 Highlights. • Eduardo Torroja’s Tempul Aqueduct as an important precursor of modern cable- stayed bridges. • Critical analysis of the Tempul Aqueduct, its history and its context. • Comparison between the results of Finite Element Models and those obtained by Torroja. Analysis of Eduardo Torroja’sTempul Aqueduct an important precursor of modern cable-stayed bridges, extradosed bridges and prestressed concrete Jose Antonio Lozano-Galant1, Ignacio Paya-Zaforteza2 1 Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos. Universidad de Castilla La Mancha. Avda. Camilo José Cela, s/n, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain 2 ICITECH, Departamento de Ingeniería de la Construcción,UniversitatPolitècnica de València. Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain Authors e-mail addresses: Jose Antonio Lozano-Galant: [email protected] Ignacio Paya-Zaforteza: igpaza@ upv.es ABSTRACT This paper describes a study of the Tempul Aqueduct, one of the first structures designed and built by Eduardo Torroja.
    [Show full text]
  • Dodam Bridge
    A GLOBAL BRIDGE World’s Longest Sea Bridge NETWORK SYSTRA has been a world leader in the World’s Longest Floating Bridge fi eld of transportation infrastructure for 60 years. Bridges are a major product SHEIKH JABER AL-AHMAD AL-SABAH CAUSEWAY line and a cornerstone of our technical Kuwait MONTREAL excellence in providing safe, effi cient, PARIS SEOUL and economical solutions. SAN DIEGO EVERGREEN POINT FLOATING BRIDGE World’s Longest Span International Bridge Technologies joined Seattle, Washington Railway Cable-Stayed Bridge NEW DELHI SYSTRA in 2017. The two companies DUBAI have combined their complementary World’s Longest technical expertise to offer specialized Concrete Span engineering services in all facets of bridge TIANXINGZHOU BRIDGE design, construction, and maintenance. China World’s Fastest Design & SYSTRA’s Global Bridge Network consists Construction Supervision on any Metro Project of over 350 bridge specialists deployed 3rd PANAMA CANAL CROSSING worldwide, with Bridge Design Centers Colón, Panama World’s Longest located in San Diego, Montreal, São Paolo, Double Suspension Bridge SÃO PAOLO Paris, Dubai, New Delhi, and Seoul. MECCA (MMMP) METRO Saudi Arabia CHACAO BRIDGE BRIDGE DESIGN CENTERS Chacao, Chile • SERVICES • Tender Preparation • BIM / BrIM • Conceptual Design • Complex Drafting & Specialized Detailing • Pre-Bid Engineering • Realistic Graphics • Proposal Preparation - 3D Renderings - Visual Animation • Specifications Preparation - Construction Sequence Animation • Bids Analysis • Technical Assistance During Construction
    [Show full text]
  • Extradosed Bridges in Poland—Design and Construction
    TECHNOLOGY REPOrt published: 03 January 2017 doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2016.00037 Extradosed Bridges in poland—Design and Construction Jan Biliszczuk1,2*, Jerzy Onysyk1,2, Wojciech Barcik2, Robert Toczkiewicz2 and Artur Tukendorf 3 1 Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland, 2 Research & Design Office Mosty-Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland, 3 Budimex S.A., Warsaw, Poland The road and railway infrastructure in Poland has been intensively developed and modernized for the last years. Around 300 new bridges are built annually. Among the new structures, there is a group of modern extradosed bridges. This paper presents examples of short-, medium-, and long-span extradosed bridges designed and built in recent years in Poland. The following structures are described in details: (1) the first Polish extradosed bridge; (2) two-span landmark viaduct over motorway; (3) multi- span curved motorway bridge; (4) the longest Polish extradosed bridge; (5) tramway extradosed bridge; and (6) conceptual designs. The paper is concluded with geometrical parameters characterizing presented structures. The parameters are compared with values obtained for cable-stayed bridges and extradosed bridges built worldwide. Edited by: Keywords: extradosed bridge, prestressed concrete, design, construction technology, geometrical parameter Anastasios Sextos, University of Bristol, Greece INTRODUCTION Reviewed by: Luigi Di Sarno, The extradosed bridge is a relatively new type of structure that has been developed since the 1990s. University of Sannio, Italy Stergios Mitoulis, The first such structure was the Odawara Blueway bridge, which was designed and constructed in University of Surrey, UK Japan (Shirono et al., 1993). The extradosed bridge can be defined as the structure being between the girder bridge and the cable-stayed bridge (Mermigas, 2008; Collings and Gonzalez, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Extradosed Bridge Design One of a Kind on I-95 Project
    BY JAMES A. PLATOSH, P.E. CONTRIBUTING AUTHOR Extradosed bridge design one of a kind on I-95 project he replacement of the Pearl Harbor Memorial Bridge, which spans the Quinnipiac River in New Haven, Conn., will be the nation’s fi rst bridge to employ the technique of “extradosed” design—a relatively new concept that is a hybrid between a box girder Tand a conventional cable-stayed structure. The existing bridge is a girder and fl oorbeam design, in which steel beams support the concrete bridge deck. Known locally as the Q-Bridge (for Quinnipiac), the new structure will replace the original span, which opened in 1958. The replacement bridge, which is scheduled for completion in 2016, is the centerpiece of a $2 billion program to reconstruct and widen 13 miles of I-95 between West Haven and Branford. The overall project is part of the New Haven Harbor Crossing Corridor Improvement Program, one of the largest, most comprehensive transportation programs ever undertaken in Connecticut. The Q-Bridge carries I-95 over New Haven Harbor at the confl uence of the Quinnipiac and Mill rivers. The current structure accommodates three lanes of traffi c in each direction with no inside or outside shoulders. Ini- tially designed to handle 40,000 vehicles a day, it now carries more than 60,000, and its volume is expected to increase to 140,000 by 2015. The Con- necticut Department of Transportation (CTDOT) identifi ed the area through which the bridge passes as the largest bottleneck in the state. Excessive volume is not the only problem.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Various Types of Bridges in India with Historical Perspective
    Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education Vol. XIV, Issue No. 2, January-2018, ISSN 2230-7540 A Study of Various types of Bridges in India with Historical Perspective Manjeet* Guest Faculty/Resource Person, Department of Civil Engineering, U.I.E.T. M. D. University, Rohtak Abstract – Bridges are structures which are built over an obstacle like valley, water or road with the purpose of making a transportation route. Bridges lay horizontally between some types of supports. These are used for transportation of vertical loads. The important aspect of a bridge is that it does not provide any kind of hindrance to the route beneath it. In the beginning bridges were very simple structures that were built from easily accessible natural resources- wooden logs, stone and dirt. Because of that, they had ability only to span very close distances, and their structural integrity was not high because mortar was not yet invented and rain slowly but constantly dissolved dirt fillings of the bridge. Evolution also came in the field of Bridge construction. They can be classified in many ways, such as on the basis of the construction material used, the style, or the mechanism for holding weight, etc. However, they are most commonly differentiated on the basis of their mechanism for bearing weight. The present paper is an attempt to study the various types of bridges in India namely cantilever bridges, arched bridges, extradosed bridges and cable-styled bridges and their history. Key Words: Bridge, cantilever bridge, arched bridge, extradosed bridge and cable-styled bridge. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HISTORY OF INDIAN BRIDGES: Suspension bridge (150m to 2000m span) etc.
    [Show full text]
  • PPCO Twist System
    PROJECT Extradosed Prestressed Concrete Bridges Proportioning guidelines and a design example by Dr. Steven L. Stroh, AECOM 0.8 for conventional cast-in-place-on- falsework construction to about 0.65 for balanced-cantilever construction. A review of worldwide data on extradosed bridges shows that L1/L varied from 0.33 to 0.83 with a mean of 0.57.1 The standard deviation is 0.12, so one standard deviation each side of the mean gives a range for L1/L of 0.45 to 0.69. This places extradosed bridges essentially between the envelopes of concrete cable-stayed bridges and The Odawara Port Bridge, Japan, is the world’s first extradosed prestressed concrete balanced-cantilever-constructed concrete- bridge, completed in 1994. Photo: Steven Stroh. girder bridges. Extradosed prestressed concrete bridges Based on these data, a range from 300 Multi-span are a relatively new development in bridge to 600 ft is shown to be a common span Bridge Application engineering, with only about 60 of these range for typical bridges of this type, with Cable-stayed bridges are typically either completed worldwide. The extradosed span range applicability of 200 to 900 ft. two-span or three-span arrangements. prestressed concrete bridge has the These span arrangements are ideal for appearance of a cable-stayed bridge with Side Span Ratios cable-stayed bridges because back stay “short” towers, but behaves structurally The ratio between the main span length, cables can be provided from the anchor closer to a prestressed concrete girder L, and the side span length, L1, has an piers to the top of the towers to provide bridge with external prestressing.
    [Show full text]