St Croix River Bridge Design Cover
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Proposal for: S t . C r o i x C r o s s i n g P r o j e c t April 27, 2012 Final Bridge Design Prepared for: Create Minnesota Department of Transportation Preserve Activate Prepared by: 100 South Fifth Street Suite 1500 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Technical Proposal Technical Technical Proposal St. Croix Crossing Project Final Bridge Design • Perform a review of the bridge deck drainage system along with the hydraulic analysis of the bridges and the entire construction project. Produce final design and details for a bridge drainage system balancing the visual elements of the box girder bridges with the external drainage pipes necessary to convey the drainage. • Deliver final construction plans by May 17, 2013 with a design that is developed to keep the construction cost within the overall project budget. With our previous experience on similar projects, URS is very aware of and confident we will overcome all technical challenges associated with this project. These challenges include: 1) the understanding of complex load paths and force flows within the extradosed structure; 2) the difficulties in constructing large foundations in water; 3) engineering challenges related to the bridge drainage system; and 4) developing a plan set and construction scheme that is economical and bidder-friendly. However, perhaps the most critical challenge to achieving a successful project will be to maintain both budget and schedule while developing all design deliverables. This logistical aspect of the project will require, first and foremost, the experienced and talented project manager we have chosen to guide this team, Steve Stroh, PE, PhD. For this important project URS is making its most experienced bridge manager available. Steve has the distinction of being the Engineer of Record (EOR) of the first Extradosed Prestressed Bridge in the U.S., the Pearl Harbor Memorial Bridge and is also one of URS’ most experienced project managers for complex bridge projects. Steve will be supported by an experienced, committed and dedicated staff that brings unequaled experience in extradosed prestress bridge design and the other necessary expertise to assure a successful outcome for this project. We are excited about this opportunity to help MnDOT with the final design of this very important bridge project. 3. Work Plan and Project Approach and Methodology PROJECT COORDINATION Contract Administration, Management, Schedule: Steve Stroh, PE, PhD, and Mark Maves, PE, will spearhead the efforts of the St. Croix River Crossing project management team. This team brings a balance of local experience with MnDOT and national experience on similar complex bridge projects. Their first task will be the Project Execution Plan, which will be delivered 10 days after the Notice to Proceed (NTP). The Project Execution Plan (PXP), shared with MnDOT, will include an estimated sheet count by number and title and the anticipated percentage complete for particular sheets for each submittal. Additionally they will have worked proactively prior to the NTP to mobilize within URS and our project team, ALL the resources necessary for this challenging project, such that, there is no lag time between the NTP and productive work being accomplished. With upwards of 300 bridge engineers nationwide, and with the support of our nine subconsultants, URS will bring to bear a large group of committed and talented individuals with a common purpose of providing a quality product to MnDOT for the St. Croix River Crossing Project. URS has experience with successfully completing similar large scale “mega project” assignments in a very limited time frame. Examples include, the Kap Shui Mun Bridge in Hong Kong (a major cable stayed bridge designed and constructed in 3 years), and the ROC 52 Design-Build project in Rochester ($240 million reconstruction project designed in one year). The Gantt chart shown on the following page illustrates our proposed design schedule to perform the tasks listed in the RFPs Scope of Work. Our URS experience with the preliminary, final and post design phases of the Pearl Harbor Memorial Bridge, the first extradosed bridge in the United States and of similar complexity to the St. Croix River Bridge Project, provides MnDOT with valuable insights and a minimal learning curve related to extradosed bridge design. The same team leaders for the successful Pearl Harbor Memorial Bridge project: Steve Stroh, Bob Anderson, Velvet Bridges, Richard Beaupre, Ed Bell, Scott Montgomery, and Daniel Mariscal also form the core team for the St. Croix River Crossing Project. Peer Review Coordination: Through our peer review of MnDOT’s Lafayette Segmental Box Girder Design, URS is very familiar with the interface intended between the bridge designer and the peer reviewer. We will accommodate open and effective communication with the peer reviewer and work with them to resolve all comments in a timely manner. We understand the value of this very important Page 2 URS Corporation April 27, 2012 ID Task Name Duration Start Finish June July August September October November December January February March April May June July August Septe E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B M E B 1 Notice to Proceed (Assumed) 0 days Fri 6/1/12 Fri 6/1/12 6/1 2 Kick Off Meeting 0 days Thu 6/7/12 Thu 6/7/12 6/7 3 Design Review Meetings 260 days Sun 7/1/12 Mon 7/1/13 17 Design review teleconferences 240 days Sun 7/15/12 Sat 6/15/13 30 Project Managements Plan 10 days Fri 6/1/12 Thu 6/14/12 31 Document Security Plan 10 days Fri 6/1/12 Thu 6/14/12 32 Design and load rating criteria 10 days Fri 6/1/12 Thu 6/14/12 33 Receive peer review comments 0 days Thu 6/28/12 Thu 6/28/12 6/28 34 Final design and rating criteria 6 days Fri 6/29/12 Fri 7/6/12 35 Baseline P6 CPM 21 days Fri 6/1/12 Fri 6/29/12 36 Precast Vs. Cast-in-place investigation 15 days Fri 6/1/12 Thu 6/21/12 37 Review of Preliminary Plans/Propose Revisions 15 days Fri 6/1/12 Thu 6/21/12 38 CPM Updates 238 days Wed 8/1/12 Mon 7/1/13 51 Drainage Sys. Des. Rev. 1 day? Fri 6/1/12 Fri 6/1/12 52 Project Permits 241 days Mon 7/2/12 Mon 6/3/13 65 Concept Design (30% Plan) 80 days Fri 6/1/12 Thu 9/20/12 66 Concept design 30% Plan 56 days Fri 6/1/12 Fri 8/17/12 67 Quality Control 5 days Mon 8/6/12 Fri 8/10/12 68 Draft Engineers Cost Estimate 10 days Mon 8/6/12 Fri 8/17/12 69 Draft Foundation Recommendations 56 days Fri 6/1/12 Fri 8/17/12 70 Site Specific Wind Report 56 days Fri 6/1/12 Fri 8/17/12 71 Wind tunnel Section Model Study 46 days Fri 6/15/12 Fri 8/17/12 72 Vessel Collision Study 20 days Fri 6/15/12 Thu 7/12/12 73 Corrosion protection plan outline 20 days Mon 7/23/12 Fri 8/17/12 74 Aesthetic Lighting 20 days Fri 6/29/12 Thu 7/26/12 75 Constructibility Workshop 2 days Mon 8/27/12 Tue 8/28/12 76 Receive Peer Review of 30% 0 days Fri 8/31/12 Fri 8/31/12 8/31 77 SHPO Review 24 days Mon 8/20/12 Thu 9/20/12 78 Final 30% Plan 10 days Mon 9/3/12 Fri 9/14/12 79 Public Outreach 0 days Fri 8/24/12 Fri 8/24/12 8/24 80 Final Design (60% Plan) 114 days Mon 8/20/12 Thu 1/24/13 81 Draft Final Design 90 days Mon 8/20/12 Fri 12/21/12 82 Quality Control 5 days Mon 12/10/12 Fri 12/14/12 83 Preliminary Load Rating Results 15 days Mon 12/3/12 Fri 12/21/12 84 Constructibility Review 20 days Mon 11/26/12 Fri 12/21/12 85 Engineers Cost Estimate 10 days Mon 12/10/12 Fri 12/21/12 86 Receive Pile load test results (date TBD) 0 days Fri 9/14/12 Fri 9/14/12 9/14 87 Final Foundation Recommendations 20 days Fri 9/14/12 Thu 10/11/12 88 Redundancy Analysis Report Bridge 82045 30 days Mon 11/12/12 Fri 12/21/12 89 Wind Tunnel Aeroelastic Study 90 days Mon 8/20/12 Fri 12/21/12 90 Stay Vibration Study 60 days Mon 10/1/12 Fri 12/21/12 91 Draft Maintenance on Inspection Manual 30 days Mon 11/12/12 Fri 12/21/12 92 Draft Corrosion Protection Plan 30 days Mon 11/12/12 Fri 12/21/12 93 Contractor Information Meeting 0 days Fri 12/28/12 Fri 12/28/12 12/28 94 Receive comments on Draft Corrosion plan 0 days Fri 1/11/13 Fri 1/11/13 1/11 95 Receive Peer Review 60% 0 days Fri 1/18/13 Fri 1/18/13 1/18 96 Public Outreach 0 days Fri 12/28/12 Fri 12/28/12 12/28 97 SHPO Review 24 days Mon 12/24/12 Thu 1/24/13 98 Final Plan (95% Plan) 94 days Mon 12/24/12 Thu 5/2/13 99 Final Plan 70 days Mon 12/24/12 Fri 3/29/13 100 Quality Control 5 days Mon 3/18/13 Fri 3/22/13 101 Plan Constructibility Review 20 days Mon 3/4/13 Fri 3/29/13 102 Engineers cost estimate 10 days Mon 3/18/13 Fri 3/29/13 103 Final Maintenance an Inspection Manual 20 days Mon 3/4/13 Fri 3/29/13 104 Final corrosion protection plan 20 days Mon 1/14/13 Fri 2/8/13 105 Threat and Vulnerability Assessment 30 days Mon 2/18/13 Fri 3/29/13 106 Receive Peer Review Comments 0 days Fri 4/19/13 Fri 4/19/13 4/19 107 Public Outreach 0 days Fri 4/5/13 Fri 4/5/13 4/5 108 SHPO Review 24 days Mon 4/1/13 Thu 5/2/13 109 Certified Final Plans (100% Plan) 15 days Mon 4/22/13 Fri 5/10/13 110 Certified Final Plan (100%) 15 days Mon 4/22/13 Fri 5/10/13 111 Quality Control 3 days Mon 5/6/13 Wed 5/8/13 112 Cost Estimate Update 10 days Mon 4/29/13 Fri 5/10/13 113 Re-bid Meeting (Date TBD) 0 days Fri 5/24/13 Fri 5/24/13 5/24 114 Rating Manual 109 days Mon 4/1/13 Thu 8/29/13 115 Draft Rating Manual 66 days Mon 4/1/13 Mon 7/1/13 116 Receive Peer Review Comments 23 days Tue 7/2/13 Thu 8/1/13 117 Final Rating Manual (date TBD) 20 days Fri 8/2/13 Thu 8/29/13 118 Maint.