DOCSLIB.ORG

Aging with a Disability – Focus Group Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aging with a Disability – Focus Group Report Aging with a Disability For the Project: “Aging with a Disability: Research Phase” Access Independent Living Services, Michael Mathieson, 2014 Funding provided by the Ontario Trillium Foundation Application ID number: 124068 North Yorkers for Disabled Persons Access Independent Living Services 2 Aging with a Disability © 2015 Principal Investigators: Michael Mathieson & Cathy Samuelson Report Developed by: Fady Shanouda M.A., Ph.D. Student & Samantha Walsh M.A., Ph.D. Candidate Trillium Research Advisory Committee: Michael Mathieson, Cathy Samuelson, Stacey Lintern & John Mossa Produced by: Access Independent Living Services 50 Ashwarren Road Toronto, Ontario M3J 1Z5 Canada www.accessils.ca Access Independent Living Services 3 Aging with a Disability © 2015 © June 2015 Access Independent Living Services Table of Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................5 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................6 Purpose............................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Methodology .................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Findings.............................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Recommendations ...................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Introduction .............................................................................................................................13 Aging with a Disability ............................................................................................................................................................ 13 Defining Disability ..................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Distinctions Between Seniors and People Aging with Disabilities ...................................................................... 14 Methodology ............................................................................................................................15 A Community-Based Research Project ............................................................................................................................. 15 Project History ............................................................................................................................................................................. 15 Phase 2 Starts............................................................................................................................................................................... 16 Facilitator Training .................................................................................................................................................................. 16 Focus Group Questions ............................................................................................................................................................. 16 Recruitment .................................................................................................................................................................................. 17 Focus Groups ................................................................................................................................................................................ 17 Focus Group Sessions ................................................................................................................................................................ 17 Participants................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Limitations .................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Ethics ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 19 Findings and Analysis ...............................................................................................................21 Choice in Everything: Current and Future Needs ........................................................................................................ 21 Social Positions of Disability ................................................................................................................................................. 22 Structural and Institutional Concerns .............................................................................................................................. 27 Gender, Sexuality, and Race................................................................................................................................................... 30 Risk of Abuse ................................................................................................................................................................................. 32 Gaps in Services ........................................................................................................................................................................... 34 Transportation ............................................................................................................................................................................ 38 Housing ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 40 Community and Culture .......................................................................................................................................................... 41 Assisted Dying .............................................................................................................................................................................. 43 Recommendations....................................................................................................................44 Policy and Regulatory Measures ......................................................................................................................................... 44 Funding ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 44 Service Delivery ........................................................................................................................................................................... 45 Education and Information ................................................................................................................................................... 45 Access Independent Living Services 4 Aging with a Disability © 2015 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................46 References ................................................................................................................................47 Appendices ...............................................................................................................................49 Glossary of Terms .....................................................................................................................68 Access Independent Living Services 5 Aging with a Disability © 2015 Acknowledgements We would like to express our deep appreciation to all the participants who attended focus groups. Your stories and experiences were the greatest contribution to the project. Thank you also to all those individuals who expressed interest in attending a focus group, but who were not able to attend for various reasons. We would also like to acknowledge the work of various staff at the Centre for Independent Living in Toronto (CILT). The advice given by Sandra Carpenter, Leisa DeBono, Ian Parker and Melanie Moore has been a great help throughout the project and the writing of this report. And it is with gratitude that we thank Nancy Barry and Carling Barry for their work on the project during Phase 1 and through the initial stages of Phase 2. Thank you both for developing the research topic and for bringing this project to the attention of local service providers. Special thanks must also go to John Mossa from CILT, who has spent considerable time and energy helping to guide the project, including the completion of this report. We would also like to acknowledge the work
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reducing Caregiver Burden: Fostering Healthy Aging and Social Support Maria A
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 3-13-2017 Reducing Caregiver Burden: Fostering Healthy Aging and Social Support Maria A. Rodriguez University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Other Medical Specialties Commons, Other Sociology Commons, and the Public Health Commons Scholar Commons Citation Rodriguez, Maria A., "Reducing Caregiver Burden: Fostering Healthy Aging and Social Support" (2017). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/6753 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reducing Caregiver Burden: Fostering Healthy Aging and Social Support by Maria A. Rodriguez A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Public Health Department of Community and Family Health College of Public Health University of South Florida Co-Major Professor: Carla VandeWeerd, Ph.D. Co-Major Professor: Jamie Corvin, Ph.D. Ross Andel, Ph.D. Date of Approval: March 24, 2017 Keywords: older caregivers, aging in place, retirement communities, qualitative research, health interventions, successful aging Copyright © 2017, Maria A. Rodriguez DEDICATION I dedicate this work to my parents, Nancy and Jaime. You taught me the value of family as a source of love, comfort, and support; and you continue to nurture our familial foundation. You’ve always strived to make the best choices for our family, many of which were very difficult, to ensure opportunities for our success and happiness.
    [Show full text]
  • Helping Americans Age in Place. May 2013. #13
    RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS IN THE DEMOGRAPHY AND ECONOMICS OF AGING NO. 13 MAY 2013 HELPING AMERICANS AGE IN PLACE Older Americans today are living longer and functioning at a higher level than they were in 1965 when Congress passed BOX 1 the Older Americans Act (OAA). The law was designed to The Older Americans Act address a lack of community-based social services for older people and to enable older people to live as independently The Older Americans Act (OAA) established the as possible (see Box 1). National Aging Network, which is made up of more than 20,000 local service providers overseen by the The approach of the 50th anniversary of the OAA is an Administration on Aging on the federal level (now part appropriate time to review some recent research on topics of the Administration for Community Living), State relevant to OAA services. Research centers focused on the Units on Aging at the state level, and Area Agencies demography and economics of aging and supported by the on Aging and tribal organizations at the community National Institute on Aging (NIA) are an important mechanism level. The OAA legislation continues to set policy for carrying out such research. This brief draws on findings for and direct funds to social service and nutrition from researchers affiliated with these centers as well as other programs, elder rights protection, and disease related research on the health, economic circumstances, prevention and health promotion activities for older and social well-being of older Americans that might inform people and their caregivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Aging in Place in the New River Valley
    Aging in Place in the New River Valley Next Steps towards Building Lifespan Friendly Communities Prepared by the Aging in Place Leadership Team June 2015 For more Information or to Get Involved: Action 1: Conduct a NRV Aging in Place Housing Survey and Action 4: Attain Age Friendly Community Certification Nancy Brossoie, Ph.D. Senior Research Associate Center for Gerontology at Virginia Tech 540-231-2335 [email protected] Action 2: Develop aLifespan Friendly Homes Program Shelley Fortier Executive Director Habitat for Humanity of the New River Valley 540- 381-1144 [email protected] Action 3: Establish a TimeBank in the NRV Ellen Stewart Housing & Community Development Grants Coordinator Town of Blacksburg and New River Valley HOME Consortium 540-951-4347 [email protected] www.nrvhome.org Action 5: Create an Aging in Place Services Connector Tina King Executive Director New River Valley Agency on Aging 540-980-7720 [email protected] Action 6: Encourage Land Use Policies and Regulations for Lifespan Friendly Communities Carol L. Davis Sustainability Manager Town of Blacksburg, Virginia 540-558-0786 [email protected] 2 In recognition of growing housing and service challenges, Successfully Aging at Home in the New River Valley – a grassroots, community-based initiative – was established to meet an unmet and growing need: the ability of residents to age in their homes and communities. The initiative is guided by the New River Valley (NRV) Aging in Place Leadership Team—a collaboration of eight regional organizations, which emerged during the 2010-2013 NRV Livability Initiative: NRV HOME Consortium NRV Area Agency on Aging Habitat for Humanity of the NRV Virginia Tech Center for Gerontology VA Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Aging in Place: a New Model for Long-Term Care
    P1: FPX/FSX P2: FHY AS024-01 April 4, 2000 10:20 Char Count= 36642 Aging in Place: A New Model for Long-Term Care Karen Dorman Marek and Marilyn J. Rantz It is expected that at least 40 percent of the population over 75 will need extensive health care services late in their lives. The public has a negative view of nursing home placement that has, to some extent, been confirmed by research finding that the health of a frail older person deteriorates each time he or she is moved. The Aging in Place model of care for the elderly offers care coordination (case management) and health care services to older adults so they will not have to move from one level of care delivery to another as their health care needs increase. University Nurses Senior Care (UNSC) is the service entity of this project and provides as its core service care coordination with a variety of service options. These options include care packages or services at an hourly rate to meet individual client needs. The Aging in Place project will be evaluated by comparing project clients to residents of similar acuity in nursing homes and to similar clients receiving standard community support services. Data from this project will be important to consumers, researchers, providers, insurers, and policy makers. Key words: community based care, elderly, long-term care ISSATISFACTION with the care ing home care—that is responsive to elders’ of older adults is widespread in health care needs and consumer preferences. Dthe United States among con- This public–private partnership venture is an sumers, providers, family caregivers, and innovative Aging in Place model for the el- care providers.
    [Show full text]
  • E-Connected Family Caregiver : Bringing Caregiving Into the 21St Century
    e‑Connected Family Caregiver: Bringing Caregiving into the 21st Century January 2011 Funded by UnitedHealthcare About the Study Publishers National Alliance UnitedHealthcare for Caregiving UnitedHealthcare’s core mission is to help people live healthier lives. We do this by continuously Established in 1996, the National Alliance for delivering innovations that significantly improve Caregiving is a non‑profit coalition of national the way America’s health care system works. organizations focusing on issues of family By focusing on ideas that help improve medical caregiving. The Alliance was created to conduct outcomes while reducing health care costs, we research, do policy analysis, develop national have grown to become one of America’s most programs, and increase public awareness of innovative suppliers of health care solutions and family caregiving issues. Recognizing that family a leader in health‑benefit programs for large caregivers make important societal and financial businesses, small businesses, early retirees contributions toward maintaining the well‑being of and people who want to enhance their Medicare those for whom they care, the Alliance’s mission coverage. We use our resources and expertise is to be the objective national resource on family to support consumers, patients, care providers caregiving with the goal of improving the quality of and employers. life for families and care recipients. Our breadth of services and leadership in both National Alliance for Caregiving private and public programs enables us to adapt 4720 Montgomery Lane, Suite 205 to a constantly evolving environment in order to Bethesda, MD 20814 make health care more accessible, affordable and www.caregiving.org personalized. For more information, visit www.UHC.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Kūpuna Aging in Place White Paper 2018 Page | 1
    Kūpuna Aging in Place Program for Elderly Services White Paper 2018 Theory of Change The Kūpuna Aging in Place Program for Elderly Services (KAP) supports organizations that provide a range of supportive services including community based support services, adult day care & adult day health, and caregiver support services for low- to moderate-income kūpuna (seniors) age 65 and older and their caregivers so that kūpuna in Hawaii are able to age in place, for as long as it is in their best interest. Hawaii Community Foundation (HCF) is focused on creating long-term, large-scale CHANGE across six sectors, covering a broad mosaic of community issues. CHANGE stands for Community & Economy, Health & Welfare, Arts & Culture, Natural Environment, Government & Civics, and Education. Within Health & Welfare, HCF believes that effective systems of community support – especially for Hawaii’s most vulnerable – improves the welfare of families, the long-term outlook for children, and the ability of residents to lead productive lives. The KAP program aligns with this change area to assist the growing number of kūpuna and caregivers in Hawaii to achieve their personal goals. Background There are an estimated 243,541 kūpuna 65 years and older in Hawaii making up 17% of the total population in the state according to the U.S. Census. About 8.9% of kūpuna in Hawaii are below 100% of the federal poverty level and are considered low-income. According to the U.S. Census, in 2030 all baby boomers will be older than age 65 and 1 in every 5 residents will be retirement age.1 By 2030, the population of kūpuna in Hawaii, 65 years and older, will represent 23% of the population as compared to only 8% in 1980.2 In addition, Hawaii has the highest life expectancy in the nation at over 82 years of age.
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19 Will Change the Way We Live As Older Adults
    Z T R A U Q R O F M I L G N A U G STATE OF PLAY Covid-19 will change the way we live as older adults ✦ Member exclusive by Lila MacLellan for Fixing elder care Shirley Weinstock, 91, lives in a studio suite at Jewish Home Family at Rockleigh, a senior residence in New Jersey, not far from Manhattan. On a recent weekday morning, I had the pleasure of meeting her in a Zoom call. Since mid-March, when most US states entered Covid-19 lockdowns, retirement homes have banned all visitors, though most now permit outdoor, social-distanced visits. Group recreation programs were cancelled, or at least postponed indenitely. Weinstock, like people in care homes around the world, also had to adjust to eating meals alone in her room for a spell, rather than in the dining room with friends from the building. How does she feel about these changes? She shrugs. “I know that whatever they’re doing, they’re doing it for our safety, our health,” she tells me. “They had us conned to our apartments, they brought us our meals.” “I read, I did my crossword puzzles, I watched television,” she recalls of the rst month or so of isolation. Her three adult daughters phoned regularly to chat. Weinstock explains that she lost a leg when she was hit by a car, so she uses a wheelchair. The caregiving staff at the home, where she has lived for ve years, are “wonderful,” she says, beaming at someone off-screen. “Is there anything you’d like to see change?” I ask.
    [Show full text]
  • Aging in Place Coordinating Housing and Health Care Provision for America’S Growing Elderly Population JCHS
    PROGRAM Aging in Place Coordinating Housing and Health Care Provision for America’s Growing Elderly Population JCHS JCHS Kathryn Lawler Fellowship Program for Emerging Leaders in Community and Economic Development October 2001 Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation Aging in Place NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation was established by an Act of Congress in 1978 (Public Law 95-557). A primary objective of the Corporation is to increase the capacity of local community-based organizations to revitalize their communities, particularly by expanding and improving housing opportunities. These local organizations, known as NeighborWorks® organizations, are independent, resident-led, nonprofit partnerships that include business leaders and government officials. All together they make up the NeighborWorks® network. JOINT CENTER FOR HOUSING STUDIES OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY The Joint Center for Housing Studies analyzes the ways in which housing policy and practices are shaped by economic and demographic trends and provides leaders in government, business and the nonprofit sector with knowledge and tools for formulating effective policies and strategies. Established in 1959, the Joint Center is a collaborative unit affiliated with the Harvard Design School and the Kennedy School of Government. The Center’s programs of research, education and public outreach inform debate on critical housing issues and illuminate the role of housing in shaping communities. The Policy Advisory Board, a diverse group of business leaders in the housing sector, provides support and guidance for the Center and its activities. The Joint Center also receives input from its Faculty Committee, which draws on the expertise of a university-wide group of scholars.
    [Show full text]
  • Aging in Place 2.0 Rethinking Solutions to the Home Care Challenge
    REPORT Aging in Place 2.0 The MetLife Report on Aging in Place 2.0 Rethinking Solutions to the Home Care Challenge September 2010 In conjunction with Louis Tenenbaum, CAPS, CAASH Mature Market INSTITUTE The MetLife Mature Market Institute® Established in 1997, the Mature Market Institute (MMI) is MetLife’s research organization and a recognized thought leader on the multi-dimensional and multi-generational issues of aging and longevity. MMI’s groundbreaking research, gerontology expertise, national partnerships, and educational materials work to expand the knowledge and choices for those in, approaching, or caring for those in the mature market. MMI supports MetLife’s long-standing commitment to identifying emerging issues and innovative solutions for the challenges of life. MetLife, Inc. (NYSE: MET), through its subsidiaries and affiliates, is a leading provider of insurance, employee benefits, and financial services with operations throughout the United States and the Latin American, Europe and Asia Pacific regions. 200 Park Avenue 40th Floor New York, NY 10166 [email protected] www.MatureMarketInstitute.com Louis Tenenbaum Louis Tenenbaum is an advocate and consultant focused on Universal Design and Aging in Place. As a carpenter, Louis completed his first access modifications in 1988. Turned on by the significant impact he had on the family whose home he made accessible, Louis focused his design/build remod- eling company on Aging in Place in the early 90s. Though everyone agrees Aging in Place is a good idea, it has not become successfully mainstream, leading Louis to study housing and care systems for older Americans. These investigations lead to the Aging in Place vision expressed in the current paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Residential Care/Assisted Living Compendium: Texas
    Compendium of Residential Care and Assisted Living Regulations and Policy: 2015 Edition TEXAS Licensure Terms Assisted Living Facilities General Approach The Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services (DADS) licenses several types of assisted living facilities (ALFs): assisted living apartments (single-occupancy), residential care apartments (double-occupancy), and residential care non-apartments. A person establishing or operating a facility that is not required to be licensed may not use the term "assisted living" in referring to the facility or the services provided. The ALF statute requires careful monitoring to detect and report unlicensed facilities. A facility's licensure type--A or B--is based on residents’ capability to evacuate the facility. Any facility that advertises, markets, or otherwise promotes itself as providing specialized care for persons with Alzheimer's disease or other disorders must be certified as such and have a Type B license. Adult foster care (AFC) provides a 24-hour living arrangement with supervision in an adult foster home for people who are unable to live independently in their own homes because of physical, mental, or emotional limitations. Providers and residents must live in the same household and share a common living area. With the exception of family members, no more than three adults may live in the foster home unless it is licensed as a Type C ALF, which is a four-bed facility that must have an active contract with the Department to provide AFC services before it can be licensed. A provider wishing to serve more than four individuals must obtain a DADS Type A ALF license.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Aging for Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
    Understanding Aging for Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities HCBS Conference Wednesday, Sept 2 3-4:15 p.m. Georgetown East Welcome and Thank You DD Councils • 56 DD Councils – 1 in every state and territory • 60% of Councils members must be people with I/DD or a family member • Funding for the DD Councils is appropriated by Congress and comes through the Administration on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AIDD) DD Councils • Councils identify the most pressing needs of people with I/DD in their state or territory; • Advance public policy and systems change that help individuals with I/DD live independently; • Empower individuals to advocate for themselves and others Aging and Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Matthew P. Janicki, Ph.D. University of Illinois at Chicago [email protected] • Aging and intellectual and developmental disabilities • Supports needed when people with intellectual and developmental disabilities age • Organizing and managing aging-related services for aging people with I/DD WANT DO WE MEAN BY INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES? Intellectual disability Adults who: – Have intellectual limitations that significantly limit their ability to successfully participate in normal day- to-day activities – such as self care, communication, work, or going to school, and • evolved or developed their intellectual limitation during the ‘developmental period’ (before approximately age 22), and • their limitations are anticipated to result in long term adaptive or functional support
    [Show full text]
  • 11-90- Assisted Living Facilities
    HAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES TITLE 11 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CHAPTER 90 ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY §11-90-1 Purpose §11-90-2 Definitions §11-90-3 Licensing §11-90-4 Minimum building and structural requirements §11-90-5 Emergency care and disaster planning §11-90-6 General policies, practices and administration §11-90-7 Inservice education §11-90-8 Range of services §11-90-9 Records and reports §11-90-10 Admission and discharge requirement §11-90-11 Severability §11-90-1 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish a new category of community based residential care setting to be named "assisted living facility" and to establish minimum standards and requirements for licensure to protect the health, welfare, and safety of residents in such facilities. Assisted living facilities shall serve the purpose of providing a combination of housing, meal services, health care services, and personalized supportive services designed to respond to individual needs. The following principles are applied: (1) Aging in place; (2) Negotiated plan of care; and (3) Managed risk. [Eff August 23, 1999] (Auth: HRS §§321-1, 321-9, 321-10, 321-11(10), 321-15.1) (Imp: HRS §§321-9, 321-11(10), 321-15.1) 90-1 §11-90-2 Definitions. As used in this chapter: "Abuse" means actual or imminent physical injury, psychological abuse or neglect, sexual abuse, financial exploitation, negligent treatment, or maltreatment as §11-90-2 further defined in section 346-222, HRS. "Activities of Daily Living" or "ADL" means those personal functional activities required by an individual for continued well-being including eating, dressing, personal hygiene, mobility, toileting, and behavior management.
    [Show full text]