Knowing Doing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Knowing Doing KNOWING OING &D. C S L EWI S I N S TITUTE C.S. Lewis the Truth-Seeker: How God Formed a Great Christian Apologist by Joel S. Woodruff, Ed.D. Vice President of Discipleship and Outreach, C.S. Lewis Institute This article originally appeared in the Winter 2013 issue of Knowing & Doing. nlike the dramatic, instantaneous conversion youth had been wiser, more virtu- of the apostle Paul on the road to Damascus, ous, and less self-centred than it UC.S. Lewis came to faith in Christ through a was. For I have myself been deluded search for truth that journeyed through the twists, by every one of these false answers turns, and dead ends of a long, thirty-year maze in turn and have contemplated each characterized by varying worldviews, ideas, and re- of them earnestly enough to dis- ligions. This quest involved both his intellect, which cover the cheat. To have embraced sought logical, sound answers to the questions of life, so many false Florimels is no mat- and his heart, which longed for something to fill the ter for boasting: it is fools, they say, lonely void within. As Lewis explored each world- who learn by experience. But since Joel S. Woodruff, Ed. D. view along the way, he would be enamored by the ap- they do at last learn, let a fool bring his experience into the proach, only to eventually recognize the weaknesses common stock that wiser men profit by it..1 of the view and be disappointed by the conclusions of that particular ideology. It was this thoughtful, careful, Lewis had in a sense “dated” and been infatuated Socratic-like search for life’s raison d’être that enabled by a number of “Florimels,” damsels of great beauty Lewis to understand so deeply the world’s religions who turned out to be illusions. By “dating” various and philosophies and also articulate how these views worldviews, over time, Lewis developed deep insight paled in comparison to the ultimate truth found in into the ways in which a religion can at first appear Jesus Christ. In other words, God took Lewis’s pre- attractive, only to lead to bitter disappointment when Christian wanderings in false religions and philoso- the honeymoon is over and the witch suddenly ap- phy and redeemed those experiences, enabling Lewis pears. It was this experience in the first thirty years to communicate the truths of biblical faith in ways that of his life, before his conversion, that prepared him to searching people could understand. After all, he had become one of the greatest Christian apologists of the been there himself. twentieth century. In the preface (sometimes presented as an after- word) to the third edition of The Pilgrim’s Regress, an Raised in a Christian Home allegorical look at his own conversion, Lewis writes, Lewis’s spiritual journey began within the confines The sole merit I claim for this book is that it is written by of a home in which he experienced the love and secu- one who has proved them [various worldviews] all to be rity communicated to him by his mother, Flora, the wrong. There is no room for vanity in the claim: I know daughter of an Anglican priest. Born in 1898, his early them to be wrong not by intelligence but by experiences, years afforded him great happiness. His mother read such experience as would not have come my way if my stories from the Bible, prayed with Lewis daily, and 2 C.S. Lewis the Truth-Seeker introduced him to the teachings of Christ. The family ment he made and defend his position. Some would attended a Protestant church in Belfast, although they have found Kirkpatrick intimidating, but Lewis for the didn’t have any problem in hiring a Catholic maid, first time ever enjoyed school. Later Lewis would state whom Lewis loved and who also told him Bible sto- that the intellectual rigor and challenge of Kirkpatrick ries. was like “red beef and strong beer,”3 an exhilarating Lewis’s idyllic childhood, however, would come diet that gave the bright Lewis confidence and enjoy- crashing down when his mom was diagnosed with ment. From the age of fifteen to seventeen, under the cancer. Lewis, aged nine at the time, prayed fervently Kirkpatrick’s influence, Lewis sharpened the debate that God would heal his mom. When he was greeted and reasoning skills that would serve him well for with the tragic news of her death, he became angry at the rest of his life. Rationalism, or popular realism as a God who would take away his loving mother. Added Lewis would call it, became his modus operandi as he to the pain of this loss was the inability of his father, sought to believe only that which could be proven by Albert, to comfort and console Lewis and his brother, clear logic and reason. He adopted a materialistic or Warnie. When the boys most needed their dad, just naturalistic worldview in which the only thing that weeks after their mother’s death Albert sent them off mattered was “matter.” His atheist worldview was so- to a small English boarding school to fend for them- lidifying. selves. It is interesting to note that down the road these Lewis had begun his life surrounded by Christian very Socratic reasoning tools would point Lewis in the practice and thought, but the loss of his mom and the direction of Christianity and enable him to explain the coldness of his father sent him reeling spiritually. reasonableness of the Christian faith to the modern, From this point he describes his spiritual journey in scientifically oriented world. this way: “On the intellectual side my own progress Following his years with Kirkpatrick, Lewis gained had been from ‘popular realism’ to Philosophical Ide- entrance to Oxford University. His first studies at Ox- alism; from Idealism to Pantheism; from Pantheism to ford, however, would be short-lived, as he soon found Theism; and from Theism to Christianity. I still think himself in the British Army, serving as an officer in the this a very natural road, but I now know that it is a trenches of World War I. As he witnessed firsthand the road very rarely trodden.”2 horrors of war in France and was eventually wounded in action, men dying all around him, Lewis’s atheism Pessimism, Atheism, and became more entrenched. Popular Realism Lewis would survive the war, return to his stud- ies in Oxford, and immerse himself in the academic In boarding school Lewis’s antagonism toward world. Christian faith grew as he experienced the hypocrisy of the “Christian” boarding school. The cruel hazing Philosophical Idealism of the younger boys by the older boys burnt an indel- ible impression on Lewis, as he later wrote of the pain Lewis was an outstanding student who attained a inflicted by those in the “inner circle.” Lewis’s first triple first at Oxford in classics, philosophy, and Eng- headmaster frequently beat his students and was ac- lish. A triple first means that Lewis was at the top of tually declared mentally unstable soon after Lewis’s his class in each of these subjects. His photographic departure. Fortunately Lewis had the companionship memory, ability to write well, and gifting as a logician of his brother, Warnie, for some of these difficult years shot him to the head of the class. during which Lewis became a pessimistic atheist. During his student days, as many in his generation When it was clear that Lewis was suffering mis- were recovering from the horrors of war and were erably, his father relented and arranged for him to questioning the meaning of life, Lewis himself began be tutored in the home of William Kirkpatrick, who to sense that his atheism just didn’t address his inner had taught Albert himself and also Warnie. A former longings for something more. And so for a time he headmaster, Kirkpatrick was skilled in the Socratic felt drawn to what he called philosophical idealism, method and logic. From the moment Lewis met Kirk- as espoused by the British Hegelians and Henri Berg- patrick, whom he called “The Great Knock,” Lewis son. This worldview argued that the world we per- was pressed to give a logical reason for every state- ceive through our senses is only appearance or curtain 3 C.S. Lewis the Truth-Seeker behind which the Absolute is hiding. In other words, lect coming next, and finally his fantasy.”5 Another Lewis was beginning to realize that there is more to word for “fantasy” would be “imagination.” Lewis this world than just “matter” and the material world noted that throughout his life he was moved by par- we live in. ticular writers as they painted a picture that enlivened his imagination and gave him a sense of joy or long- Pantheism ing that was beyond his present experience of reality. In other words, there were things that his intellect or The phase of philosophical idealism didn’t last long, mind couldn’t fully grasp that he knew were still im- as Lewis’s commitment to logic soon found the Brit- portant. ish Hegelian “Absolute” to be too vague and ambigu- He tells, for example, of the time early in his life ous. Now Lewis explored pantheistic religions such when he picked up a book titled Phantastes, by the as Hinduism and the monistic world of Buddhism. nineteenth-century Scottish writer George MacDon- He was intrigued by the idea that the “Absolute” ald, which somehow baptized Lewis’s imagination. rather than being vague was somehow immanent, A whole new world was opened up to him.
Recommended publications
  • 'Come': Apologetics and the Witness of the Holy Spirit
    1 THE SPIRIT AND THE BRIDE SAY ‘COME’: APOLOGETICS AND THE WITNESS OF THE HOLY SPIRIT Kevin Kinghorn and Jerry L. Walls In a word, Christian apologetics is a defense of Christian theism. The Greek word apologia may refer to the kind of reasoned case a lawyer provides in defending the innocence of an accused person. Or, more broadly, the word may refer to any line of argument showing the truth of some position. 1 Peter 3:15 contains the instruction to Christians: “Always be prepared to give an answer [apologia] to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have.”1 1. Testimony: human and divine Within the four Gospels one finds a heavy emphasis on human testimony in helping others come to beliefs about Christ. For example, St. Luke opens his Gospel by explaining to its recipient, Theophilus, that he is writing “an orderly account” of the life of Jesus “so that you may know the certainty of the things you have been taught.” Luke describes himself as drawing together a written account of things “just as they were handed down to us by those who from the first were eyewitnesses and servants of the Word.”2 As Richard Swinburne remarks, “it is hard to read the Gospels, Acts of the Apostles, and 1 Corinthians without seeing them as claiming that various historical events (above all, the Resurrection) occurred and that others can know these things on the testimony of the apostles to have seen them.”3 This passing down of apostolic testimony continued through the next generations of the early Christian Church.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining and Practicing Apologetics
    Defining and Practicing Apologetics In Thinking About Christian Apologetics, author James Beilby focuses on that which normally is not explained in apologetics texts and courses: the nature, history and practice of Christian apologetics, as well as the approaches and objections to it. Specifically, this text examines: What does it mean to do Christian apologetics? “Apologetics is, in the simplest possible terms, the attempt to defend a particular belief or system of beliefs against objections. Christian Thinking About apologetics involves an action (defending), a focus of the action (the Christian Apologetics: Christian faith itself), a goal (upholding Christianity as true) and a context What It Is and (the circumstances in which apologetics occurs).” Why We Do It Available What is required to “do apologetics well”? November 2011 “Doing apologetics well requires three things. First, one’s arguments must $17, 214 pages, paper, be effective. They must be logically valid and persuasive, and they must 978-0-8308-3945-2 directly address the objections offered by skeptics. Second, one must have a proper conceptualization of the nature of both Christian belief and unbelief. In other words, an apologist must properly understand both the reasons why people do not believe in the Christian God and what mature “Jim Beilby’s volume is belief in God should look like. Third, and most important, one’s attitude distinctive—it’s not your and approach to apologetic conversations must be appropriate.” normal apologetics What is problematic about overlooking the goals and textbook. As such, it is an background of apologetics? excellent addition to the “When Christian apologists bypass these questions and immediately jump growing study in this field.
    [Show full text]
  • Catholic Apologetics: a Senior Capstone Year in Theology
    CATHOLIC APOLOGETICS: A SENIOR CAPSTONE YEAR IN THEOLOGY A YEAR-LONG COURSE OF CATHOLIC APOLOGETICS IN LINE WITH THE UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS’ DOCTRINAL ELEMENTS OF A CURRICULUM FRAMEWORK © 2014. Office of Catholic Education. Catholic Diocese of Richmond. 2 © 2014. Office of Catholic Education. Catholic Diocese of Richmond. 3 © 2014. Office of Catholic Education. Catholic Diocese of Richmond. 4 CATHOLIC APOLOGETICS: A SENIOR CAPSTONE YEAR IN THEOLOGY Course Description: For the final and 4th year of Theology in the Catholic High School, students will firm the foundation of Catholic theology and belief through a year-long course in Catholic apologetics. Students will be able to defend the teaching and belief of the Catholic faith in the areas of Theology of God, the Authority of the Catholic Church, the Sacraments of the Church, and the selected Moral teachings of the Church. Particular emphasis on the dangers of relativism will be faced, while building a strong and competent understanding of a full life within the Catholic Church. Course Requirements: Students completing the course will have a working knowledge of the essential teachings of the Church. Students will complete a summer reading assignment (Mere Christianity) and regular readings throughout the year relevant to explaining and defending the faith. The course will move them through basic Christian and Catholic apologetics. Students should be able to defend any of the teachings of the Church from a Biblical, Catechetical, and Pastoral approach. Students will specifically work toward embracing the fullness of the Church’s teaching and achieve competence in explaining and, when necessary, defending the faith.
    [Show full text]
  • Missional Apologetics Draft
    Liberty University Rawlings School of Divinity Missional Apologetics: An Examination of Essential Elements in the Apologetic Approaches of Early Christian Era Apologists in Light of the Mission of Christ to a Pluralistic World. A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of Liberty University Rawlings School of Divinity in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by George B. Bannister, Sr. Lynchburg, Virginia December 2018 Copyright © 2018 by George Benjamin Bannister, Sr. All rights reserved Approval Sheet MISSIONAL APOLOGETICS: AN EXAMINATION OF ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS IN THE APOLOGETIC APPROACHES OF EARLY CHRISTIAN ERA APOLOGISTS IN LIGHT OF THE MISSION OF CHRIST TO A PLURALISTIC WORLD. George Benjamin Bannister, Sr. Read and approved by: Chairperson: ____________________________________ Date: ______________________________ To the Lord Jesus Christ, my Savior and Lord, whose grace never ceases to amaze me. To Lisa, my bride, best friend, and holder of my heart; who has loved and supported me for many years and has been the best wife and partner and ministry co-laborer any man could wish for. Without you, I would not have achieved this milestone. To my sons and their brides who have encouraged me to stay the course and pursue the goal of completing this task. Thank you, Ben and Cindy, Dan and Liliana, and Bob and Deborah. I am a man who has been blessed beyond measure and far more than I could ever deserve! Contents Figures .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Inerrancy and Authority of Scripture in Christian Apologetics
    The Journal of Ministry & Theology 50 The Inerrancy and Authority of Scripture in Christian Apologetics Lee Allen Anderson Jr. INTRODUCTION Scripture’s call to Christians to engage in the apologetic task is markedly obvious. For example, 1 Peter 3:15 instructs believers to always be “ready to make a defense (ἀπολογίαν) to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you.” Similarly, Jude 3 exhorts Christians to “contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all handed down to the saints.” Here, the “faith” refers not to the subjective element of personal trust in the Lord God, but instead to that “body of truth that very early in the church’s history took on a definite form,” that is, the content of Christian faith—doctrinal truth (cf. Gal 1:23; 1 Tim 4:1).1 Implicit in this verse, therefore, is the acknowledgment of the fact that a certain body of doctrinal truth exists, which in turn implies a source or origin for that doctrinal truth. For the Christian, the principle, authoritative source of doctrinal truth is the “God-breathed” holy Scriptures (2 Tim 3:16). The reliability of Scripture as a standard for Christian doctrine hinges on the fact that, as the inspired word of the true God who does not lie (Num 23:19; Titus 1:2; Heb 6:18), it is wholly true (Ps 119:160; John 17:17). To echo the words of the longstanding affirmation of the Evangelical Theological Society, “The Bible alone, and the Bible in its entirety, is the Word of God written and is therefore inerrant in the autographs.”2 This affirmation is not a peripheral issue to Christian theology; it is germane to the life of the church and, of logical consequence, the upholding of the Christian faith.
    [Show full text]
  • Defending Your Catholic Faith
    Eastern Catholic Re-Evangelization Center The Book of Armaments ܞ Defending Your Catholic Faith by Gary Michuta CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE - SALVATION WHAT IS SALVATION AND JUSTIFICATION?.........................................................................................2 A Word of Warning...............................................................................................................2 Defining Terms: ....................................................................................................................2 Grace .....................................................................................................................................3 Faith.......................................................................................................................................3 Works ....................................................................................................................................5 -In Brief-....................................................................................................................................6 UNDERSTANDING JUSTIFICATION ........................................................................................................7 The Preparatory Stage ...........................................................................................................7 Justification Proper................................................................................................................8 After Initial Justification .......................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Apologetics and World Religions
    Moody Theological Seminary and Graduate School Fall 2016, IS 6600 Syllabus - Apologetics and World Religions Apologetics and World Religions I. DESCRIPTION This course is an introduction to the biblical, theological, and philosophical foundations of Christian Apologetics. It includes an examination of various apologetic methodologies. Attention is given to defending the Christian worldview in response to the challenges of the 21st century. This course also surveys the history, worldview, and theology of major world religions. It also includes a critical evaluation of these religions from a biblical perspective in order to develop a Christian response to them and site visits, where possible, to various houses of worship. PROFESSOR’S DESCRIPTION The task of sound Apologetics is four fold. Starting on a solid Biblical foundation, students need to study the philosophical underpinnings and appropriate methods for (a) clarifying the central truth claims of Christianity, (b) defending against the assaults on Christianity from an increasingly anti- Christian world, (c) evaluating some modern scientific advances, scientific resources, and incorporating science in preaching and teaching, (d) critiquing and exposing the flaws in truth claims of the major religions of the world, and (e) presenting the Gospel winsomely in the context of Christian love and compassion. This course is an introduction to this task, incorporating theory and practice, and integrating Apologetics and World Religions. II. OBJECTIVES At the conclusion of this course the student will: 1. Articulate answers to some of the major questions or assaults on the Christian faith from an increasingly anti-Christian world. (knowledge and understanding, commitment and identity) 2. Delineate points of contact between science and the Christian faith, and non-Christian religions and Christianity so that they serve as conversation starters.
    [Show full text]
  • Avery Cardinal Dulles and the Future of Catholic Apologetics in America Most Reverend John O
    1 Avery Cardinal Dulles and the Future of Catholic Apologetics in America Most Reverend John O. Barres, STD, JCL St. Joseph’s Seminary Convocation Keynote Address May 11, 2018 The funeral of Avery Cardinal Dulles at St. Patrick’s Cathedral on December 18, 2008 was a key moment for the history of the Catholic Church in the United States. Cardinal Dulles, along with Fr. John Courtney Murray SJ, are the two most significant and influential Catholic American theologians. Cardinal Dulles left many theological legacies.1 He believed in an evangelizing theology and he believed that the rebirth of Apologetics could be of great service to the New Evangelization. This Keynote Address is a celebration of the August 24, 2018 100th Anniversary of the birth of Avery Cardinal Dulles. It is also an effort to be a catalyst of further discernment of the Future of Catholic Apologetics in America. The key sources of Cardinal Dulles’ thought on Apologetics are his 1999 second edition of A History of Apologetics2 in which he traces through Church history how thoughtful Christians have striven to “give a reason for the hope that was in them” (1 Peter 3:15) and his Fordham University Laurence J. McGinley lecture delivered on March 2, 2004 entitled “The Rebirth of Apologetics.” At the end of “The Rebirth of Apologetics”, Cardinal Dulles states: “While I applaud the resurgence of apologetics that we have recently seen in this country, I suggest it could benefit from the kind of personalism that Pope John Paul II professes. I have for some years been advocating an apologetics 1 See Patrick W.
    [Show full text]
  • Julius Wellhausen, Anti-Judaism, and Hebrew Bible Scholarship
    religions Article Unapologetic Apologetics: Julius Wellhausen, Anti-Judaism, and Hebrew Bible Scholarship Stacy Davis Department of Religious Studies and Theology Saint Mary’s College, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA; [email protected] Abstract: Julius Wellhausen (1844–1918) is in many ways the ancestor of modern Hebrew Bible scholarship. His Prolegomena to the History of Israel condensed decades of source critical work on the Torah into a documentary hypothesis that is still taught today in almost all Hebrew Bible courses in some form. What is not taught as frequently is the anti-Judaism that underpins his hypothesis. This is in part due to unapologetic apologetics regarding Wellhausen’s bias, combined with the insistence that a nineteenth-century scholar cannot be judged by twenty-first century standards. These calls for compassion are made exclusively by white male scholars, leaving Jewish scholars the solitary task of pointing out Wellhausen’s clear anti-Judaism. In a discipline that is already overwhelmingly white, male and Christian, the minimizing of Wellhausen’s racism suggests two things. First, those who may criticize contextual biblical studies done by women and scholars of color have no problem pleading for a contextual understanding of Wellhausen while downplaying the growing anti-Judaism and nationalism that was a part of nineteenth-century Germany. Second, recent calls for inclusion in the Society of Biblical Literature may be well intentioned but ultimately useless if the guild cannot simply call one of its most brilliant founders the biased man that he was. Keywords: Wellhausen; anti-Judaism; historical context Citation: Davis, Stacy. 2021. Unapologetic Apologetics: Julius Wellhausen, Anti-Judaism, and Hebrew Bible Scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • Apologetics Guide Week 1 WEEK 1: INTRODUCTION TO
    Apologetics Guide Week 1 WEEK 1: INTRODUCTION TO APOLOGETICS; FAITH AND REASON Opening Questions: What has been your experience with apologetics (giving reason for the hope you have in Jesus)? Have you needed to defend your Christian belief in the past? Are faith and reason incompatible? If you believe, how did you come to faith? If you do not believe, what parts of the Christian faith and/or life is holding you back? For Discussion: There may be many things in life you do not understand. But that does not stop them from being true or real. Some things you cannot reason, cannot take apart by our wills or fully comprehend with our intellects or give verbalization to—things like love, death, time—but they are nonetheless real. What are some questions you have about faith in God? A Scenario (pick 2 readers to be Jill and Mom) Scene: Jill, a junior at a Christian college, is home for the summer. Jill is a Christian, and she came to faith through a youth retreat held by a local church when she was in high school. Jill’s Mom is glad her daughter has a community that is energizing and growing her, and she has noticed the joy and sense of purpose her daughter has, but she admits she doesn’t really get what the buzz is about. Jill longs for her mom to understand and experience for herself who God is, who Jesus is, and what life in faith is. Jill: Mom, in one of my classes at school, we learned about the kingdom of God—how through Jesus Christ, God is restoring and renewing life, renewing creation, restoring relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Biblical Authority and Apologetics
    Diligence: Journal of the Liberty University Online Religion Capstone in Research and Scholarship Volume 3 Summer 2019 Article 4 August 2019 Biblical Authority and Apologetics Christopher C. Elmore Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/djrc Part of the Biblical Studies Commons Recommended Citation Elmore, Christopher C. (2019) "Biblical Authority and Apologetics," Diligence: Journal of the Liberty University Online Religion Capstone in Research and Scholarship: Vol. 3 , Article 4. Available at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/djrc/vol3/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Divinity at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Diligence: Journal of the Liberty University Online Religion Capstone in Research and Scholarship by an authorized editor of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Elmore: Biblical Authority and Apologetics Introduction One only needs to survey the Christian book market to see the various approaches to apologetics. There are the classical, evidential, presuppositional and amalgams of the three. As one reads through the evidential approach to apologetics, the emphasis on historical data and events become central and authoritative, yet little is mentioned about the importance of Scripture except for a few proof texts. The historical data becomes the authority in the evidential methodology. In the classical approach, one reads about the importance of philosophical categories and reason in the defense and promotion of the Christian faith. Thus, philosophy and rationalism become the authority in the classical apologetic methodological approach. These approaches would not outright deny biblical authority, but they do practically deny biblical authority in their methodological approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Augustine's Confessiones: the Battle Between Two Conversions
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 11-12-2018 Augustine's Confessiones: The Battle between Two Conversions Robert Hunter Craig University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Philosophy of Science Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Scholar Commons Citation Craig, Robert Hunter, "Augustine's Confessiones: The Battle between Two Conversions" (2018). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/8109 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Augustine’s Confessiones: The Battle between Two Conversions by Robert Hunter Craig A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy with a concentration in Philosophy and Religion College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Co-Major Professor: Thomas Williams, Ph.D. Co-Major Professor: Michael DeJonge, Ph.D. William Goodwin, Ph.D. Alexander Levine, Ph.D. Date of Approval: November 2, 2018 Keywords: Autopsychographical, Theo-Ratiocination, Conversion, Consciousness, Pedagogic-Apologetic Copyright © 2018, Robert Hunter Craig DEDICATED TO: God To my wife Terry Lee Craig To my professor and pastor James F. Strange PREFACE I can recall reading the Confessiones of Augustine in 1988 for the first time when I was a sophomore at Stetson University in my Introduction to Philosophy class.
    [Show full text]