Staff Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Staff Report FLATHEAD COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REPORT (#FCU-21-05) JEWEL BASIN HOLDINGS, LLC MAY 13, 2021 I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Project Description This is a report to the Flathead County Board of Adjustment regarding a request from Jeremy Prather on behalf of Jewel Basin Holdings, LLC for a conditional use permit for a ‘Hotel, motel’ on the subject property located at 241 Sportsman Lane in Bigfork, MT. The property is located within the Bigfork Zoning District and is zoned ‘B-3 Community Business’. B. Application Personnel 1. Owner 2. Applicant Jewel Basin Holdings, LLC Jeremy Prather 835 E 23rd Street 835 23rd Street Houston, TX 77009 Houston, TX 77009 C. Process Overview 1. Land Use Advisory Committee/Council The proposed land use is located within the advisory area of the Bigfork Land Use Advisory Committee (BLUAC). The BLUAC will conduct a public hearing on the proposed conditional use permit on May 27, 2021 at 4:00 P.M. at Bethany Lutheran Church, located at 8559 Highway 35, Bigfork, MT 59911. A recommendation from the BLUAC will be forwarded to the Flathead County Board of Adjustment for their consideration. 2. Board of Adjustment The Flathead County Board of Adjustment will conduct a public hearing on the proposed conditional use permit on June 1, 2021, at 6:00 P.M. in the Second Floor Conference Room of the South Campus Building located at 40 11th Street West in Kalispell, MT. Documents pertaining to this file are available for public inspection in the Flathead County Planning and Zoning Office, located on the second floor of the South Campus Building. II. PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS A. Property Location and Size The subject property is located at 241 Sportsman Lane, Bigfork, MT (see Figure 1 below). The property is approximately 0.69 acres and can be legally described as Lot 5 of Ridgeview Subdivision in the SE1/4 of SE1/4 of Section 14, Township 27 North, Range 20 West P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana. Figure 1: Subject property (outlined in yellow) B. Existing Land Use(s) and Zoning The property is located within the Bigfork Zoning District and is zoned ‘B-3 Community Business’. The property is currently undeveloped. The B-3 zoning classification is defined in Section 3.20 of the Flathead County Zoning Regulations (FCZR) as, “A business district to provide areas for the development of congregated community shopping areas, to serve the range of a number of neighborhoods of a major segment of the Planning Area. This district should be a business center and not a strip development.” C. Adjacent Land Use(s) and Zoning The majority of properties in the surrounding area are similarly zoned B-3, although the adjacent property to the north is zoned AG-40. The adjacent properties are a mixture of undeveloped, commercial and agricultural. The surrounding properties are primarily commercial business. Two lots are currently undeveloped within the subdivision. 2 Figure 2: Zoning surrounding the subject property (outlined in red) D. Summary of Request The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow for ‘Hotel, motel’ pursuant to Section 3.20.030(10) of the Flathead County Zoning Regulations (FCZR). According to the definition found Section 8.09.080, a hotel or motel is defined as “One or a group of attached, detached, or semi-detached buildings containing guest rooms or units, which are designed and used primarily for short term accommodations.” The use of property for Hotel, motel in the B-3 zone requires the issuance of a conditional use permit, the review of which is subject to specific guidelines set forth under Section 2.06.080 FCZR regarding criteria for the issuance of a conditional use permit. The applicant is proposing to construct three separate structures containing a total of 8 units. Two structures would contain one dwelling each and the larger structure would contain 6 dwelling units. According to floor plans submitted with the application, each dwelling unit in the larger structure would be approximately 1,240 square feet, one story with a height of approximately 15 feet, contain one bedroom, kitchen facilities, and bathroom facilities. The two smaller structures would each be 1,200 square feet, contain three bedrooms, one story with the height of 15 feet, kitchen and bathroom facilities. The site plan indicates a two-way driving lane and seventeen parking spaces are proposed in front of the structures, as well as some parking in front of the units. The application states, “The proposed use is to build an eight-unit hotel that will be used for short-term accommodation. The hotel will consist of six one bed/one bath units and two three bed/two bath units. The one bed/one bath units will be built as one large building with the same foundation, and the three bed/two bath units will be two separate stand-alone buildings. The hotel will be adjacent to the Jewel Basin Center, currently under construction […] and will primarily 3 be used as accommodation for guests traveling to the Jewel Basin Center, and regular tourists to the Flathead Valley.” III. COMMENTS A. Agency Comments 1. Agency referrals were sent to the following agencies on April 6, 2021: Bigfork Fire District Bigfork Water & Sewer District Bigfork School District Bonneville Power Administration Flathead City-County Environmental Health Department Flathead County Solid Waste District Flathead County Weeds & Parks Department Montana Department of Transportation Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation 2. The following is a summarized list of agency comment received as of the date of the completion of this staff report: Bonneville Power Administration o Comment: “[…] At this time, BPA does not object to this request, as the property is located approximately 7 miles away from the nearest BPA transmission lines or structures.” Email received April 7, 2021 Flathead City-County Health Department – Environmental Health Services o Comment: “This office has an objection to operation of a Tourist Home at the above referenced property. This dwelling is connected to Bigfork municipal sewer and therefore, the Health Department has no occupancy restrictions. Operation of a tourist home in the State of Montana requires licensure under title 50- 51-201 MCA as a public accommodation. Operation of the tourist home must be compliant with Montana ARM 37.111.1.” Letter received April 9, 2021 Bigfork Water & Sewer District o Comment: “Bigfork Water and Sewer District has services for one building at this lot. Water and sewer mains need to be extended to serve the proposed hotel buildings.” Email received April 15, 2021 Flathead County Solid Waste District o Comment: “[…] After reviewing the application, the Solid Waste District views no negative impact with solid waste issues at this time. The District requests that all solid waste generated at the proposed location be hauled by a private hauler. Republic Services is the licensed (PSC) Public Service Commission Licensed hauler in this area. Their business phone number is 406-676- 4330.” Letter received April 8, 2021 4 Flathead County Weeds & Parks o Comment: “I have no need for a weed management plan.” Email received April 29, 2021 B. Public Comments 1. Notification was mailed to property owners within 150 feet of the subject property on May 14, 2021, pursuant to Section 2.06.040(3) of the Flathead County Zoning Regulations. Legal notice of the public hearing on this application was published in the May 16, 2021 edition of the Daily Interlake. 2. Public Comments Received As of the date of the completion of this staff report, no written public comment has been received regarding the requested conditional use permit. It is anticipated any individual wishing to provide public comment on the proposal will do so during the public hearing. Any written comments received following the completion of this report will be provided to the Board and summarized during the public hearing. IV. CRITERIA REQUIRED FOR CONSIDERATION Per Sections 2.06.080 and 2.06.100 of the Flathead County Zoning Regulations, what follows are criteria required for consideration of a Conditional Use Permit and suggested findings of fact based on review of each criterion. A. Site Suitability 1. Adequate Usable Space The subject property is 0.69 acres and is zoned B-3 which does not have a lot coverage requirement. According to the submitted site plans, both individual structures will have a floor area of 1,200 square feet. The larger structure has a total floor area of 3,720 square feet. The setback requirements within the B-3 zone are 20 feet from the front and side corner, 15 feet from the rear and 5 feet from the side property lines for structures. An additional setback of 20 feet is required from streams, rivers, and unprotected lakes, which do not serve as property boundaries. According to the site plan, the proposed structures would meet the setback requirements. Based upon staff’s site visit and the application materials, it appears the subject property has adequate usable space to accommodate the proposed structures. 2. Adequate Access The subject property is accessed via Sportsman Lane, which is a paved, two-lane, private road within a 60 foot wide right-of-way and located at the end of a cul-de-sac. The applicant states, “Access to the subject property is provided by Sportsman Lane, a 25 foot wide two way paved road. Access to Sportsman Lane is from Montana Highway 82.” Given low traffic volume on Sportsman Lane and low speeds on the road, the proposal appears to have adequate access. 3. Absence of Environmental Constraints The subject property is relatively flat adjacent to the road right-of-way and is gently rolling towards the rear of the lot.
Recommended publications
  • Bigfork North/South EA
    Environmental Assessment & Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation For Bigfork North & South STPP 52-1(18) 27 Control No. 4035 Prepared for: Montana Department of Transportation June 2004 Environmental Assessment & Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation For Bigfork North and South STPP 52-1(18) 27 Control No. 4035 This document is prepared in conformance with the Montana Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) requirements and contains the information required for an Environmental Assessment under the provisions of ARM 18.2.237(2) and 18.2.239. It is also prepared in conformance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requirements for an Environmental Assessment under 23 CFR 771.119. Submitted Pursuant to 42 USC 4332(2)(c) 49 U.S.C. 303 & Sections 2-3-104, 75-1-201 M.C.A. By the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration And the Montana Department of Transportation Submitted by: Date: Montana Department of Transportation Environmental Services Reviewed and Approved for Distribution: Date: Federal Highway Administration One may contact the following people for additional information regarding this document: Jean A. Riley, P.E. Craig Genzlinger Engineering Section Supervisor Missoula Operations Engineer Environmental Services Bureau Montana Division Montana Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 2701 Prospect Avenue 2880 Skyway Drive PO Box 201001 Helena, Montana 59602 Helena, MT 59620-1001 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................ES-1
    [Show full text]
  • Appraisal Report Of
    APPRAISAL REPORT OF: A 78.30 ACRE TRACT – AS IF VACANT AT MONTANA HIGHWAY 83 CONDON, MONTANA PREPARED FOR: Ms. Emily Cooper, Land Sections Supervisor State of Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation Trust Land Management Division P.O. Box 201601 Helena, Montana 59620-1601 MARKET VALUE AS OF: April 12, 2017 PREPARED BY: Elliott M. Clark, MAI & Christopher D. Clark Clark Real Estate Appraisal 704-C East 13th Street, #509 Whitefish, Montana 59937 (406) 862-8151 704-C East 13th Street, #509 Whitefish, Montana 59937 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL May 11, 2017 Ms. Emily Cooper, Land Sections Supervisor State of Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation Trust Land Management Division P.O. Box 201601 Helena, Montana 59620-1601 Re: Appraisal Report of Real Property Identified as Swan Valley Retreat, Condon, Montana (As If Vacant) Dear Ms. Cooper: In compliance with your request Elliott M. Clark, MAI and Christopher D. Clark with Clark Real Estate Appraisal viewed the above referenced property on April 12, 2017 accompanied by Mr. Claude Cassidy, Ms. Emily Cooper, and Ms. Chloe Katsilas all with the Montana DNRC. We reviewed applicable information regarding zoning, and researched and analyzed trends in real estate activity in the immediate and greater subject market area. The property viewing, reviews, and analyses were made in order to prepare the attached appraisal report in a summary format. We were requested by the client to provide an opinion of value for the subject property As If Vacant. For that reason, the value concluded in this report is based upon the Hypothetical Condition that the property was vacant as of the report effective date.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB Control No. 1024-0018 expiration date 03/31/2022 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Stark House__________________________________ Name of related multiple property listing: ____N/A___________________________________________________ (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: _4945 Lindbergh Lake Road _________________________ City or town: _Condon___________ State: __MT__________ County: Missoula ____ Not For Publication: Vicinity: X ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic
    [Show full text]
  • Swan Valley-Condon Comprehensive Plan Amendment
    $5.50 Swan Valley-Condon Comprehensive Plan Amendment Missoula County, Montana Adopted by the Missoula County Commissioners December 18, 1996 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Michael Kennedy Barbara Evans Fern Hart MISSOULA CONSOLIDATED PLANNING BOARD Ginny Cass Janene Caywood Helen Cipolato John Fletcher Bonnie Gee Troy Kurth Tom Maclay John Spangler Gerald Stone Sam Warren SWAN VALLEY COMMUNITY CLUB COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMMITTEE Gloria Bush Al Cluck Chris Goodman Michelle Holmes, Recorder Sue Holmes Marita Kirchhofer Len Kobylenski Mike Lake Rolle Matthew Zoe Mohesky, County Planning resource, Office of Planning & Grants Tom Parker Jerry Sorensen, Manager, Land Use Planning, Plum Creek Timber Company Alan “Pete” Taylor, Facilitator Acknowledgments - i SWAN VALLEY-CONDON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN STATEMENT OF PURPOSE This plan, prepared by a committee, and approved by the residents of the Swan Valley establishes community objectives and goals to be used by the Missoula County Office of Planning and Grants and the Board of County Commissioners in guiding future growth in the Swan Valley. The plan includes appendices and references numerous studies that are available at the Swan Valley Community Library. The Swan Valley Community Club will serve as the liaison between the community, agencies and the County Commissioners on land use issues. ii - Statement of Purpose SWAN VALLEY-CONDON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Swan Valley Geographic Area
    Flathead National Forest Forest Plan Swan Valley Geographic Area General overview The Swan Valley geographic area encompasses the entire Swan River basin and also extends north into the eastern portion of the Flathead River valley and west to encompass a portion of the east shore of Flathead Lake. The Flathead Indian Reservation borders the geographic area to the west, following the shore of Flathead Lake and the Mission Mountains divide. The divide between the Swan River and Clearwater River basins forms the southern border, shared by the Lolo National Forest. The peaks of the Swan Range form the eastern border. The Flathead River valley in the northern portion of the geographic area is mostly non-NFS land. A substantial portion (approximately 28 percent) of the Swan River watershed is also non-NFS land, about half of which is the approximately 61,000-acre Swan River State Forest. Acres in the Swan Valley in private ownership were much higher prior to 2010, when the Forest Service acquired approximately 45,000 acres of Plum Creek Timber Company lands through the Montana Legacy Project. Portions of the Swan Lake Ranger District are within this geographic area. The Swan River watershed is characterized by a wide valley bottom of flat to rolling, gently sloped terrain that is bordered on both sides by rugged mountains jutting up steeply from the valley floor. Elevation ranges from about 3,000 feet at the mouth of the Swan River on the shores of Flathead Lake to over 8,000 feet on the highest peaks of the Swan Range and Mission Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Flathead National Forest Land Management Plan
    United States Department of Agriculture Flathead National Forest Land Management Plan Flathead, Lake, Lewis and Clark, Lincoln, Missoula, and Powell Counties, Montana Forest Service Northern Region November 2018 “. for the greatest good of the greatest number for the longest time.” —Gifford Pinchot, founding Chief of the Forest Service, 1905 Cover (images described clockwise from upper left): • South Fork of the Flathead River, Spotted Bear Ranger District • Forwarder working on the Paint Emery Resource Management Project, Hungry Horse- Glacier View Ranger District • Two hikers • Snowmobiler • View from trail to Pentagon Cabin in the Bob Marshall Wilderness (photo by Peter Borgesen) • Fireweed • White-tailed deer (photo by John Littlefield) Flathead National Forest Land Management Plan Flathead, Lake, Lewis and Clark, Lincoln, Missoula, and Powell Counties, Montana Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Responsible official: Chip Weber, Forest Supervisor Flathead National Forest 650 Wolfpack Way Kalispell, MT 59901 406-758-5204 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation
    ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SECTION 7 CONSULTATION BIOLOGICAL OPINION on the Revised Forest Plan for the Flathead National Forest TAILS Number: 06E11000-2016-F-0370 FS Agency: U.S. Forest Service Flathead National Forest Kalispell, Montana Consultation Conducted by: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Montana Ecological Services Office Kalispell, Montana NOVEMBER 22, 2017 FNF Revised Forest Plan Biological Opinion: Chapter 1 06E11000-2016-F-0370 Chapter I. Introduction Table of Contents A. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 1 B. CONSULTATION HISTORY ............................................................................................. 2 C. ORGANIZATION OF THIS BIOLOGICAL OPINION ................................................. 6 D. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION ............................................................. 6 1. Description of the Project Area............................................................................................ 6 2. Species in the Project Area .................................................................................................. 6 3. Description of the Proposed Action ..................................................................................... 8 Purpose of the Proposed Action .............................................................................................. 8 Development of the Revised Forest Plan .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Trout in Swan Lake, Montana: a Summary of the Efforts of the Swan Valley Bull Trout Working Group 2005-2017
    Lake Trout in Swan Lake, Montana: A Summary of the Efforts of the Swan Valley Bull Trout Working Group 2005-2017 Prepared by: Wade Fredenberg Fisheries Biologist, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Leo Rosenthal Fisheries Biologist, Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks May 1, 2018 Photo credit: Joel Sartore for National Geographic with Wade Fredenberg Table of Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................. 3 List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Introduction and Background ...................................................................................................................... 5 Study Area ....................................................................................................................................... 5 History of the Swan Lake Fishery .................................................................................................... 9 Formation & Activities of the Swan Valley Bull Trout Working Group - 2005-Present ......................... 12 Initiation of Gill Net Sampling and Sonic Tagging Research 2006-2007 ...................................... 13 Lake Trout Depletion and Associated Research 2008 .................................................................. 13 Three-year Suppression Experiment 2009-2011 .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Seeley Lake Community Council
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Residents of the Plan Area Seeley Lake Community Council (past and current) Sam Bolton Jay Kolbe Ron Cox Addrien Marx Carol Evans Mary Ann Morin George Frasca Val Natale Jack Greenwood Gary Pelletier Jon Haufler Cheryl Thompson Walt Hill Diane Weatherman Steve Johnson Natalie Wiseheart Missoula Consolidated Planning Board (at time of review) Don MacArthur (chair) Heidi Kendall Jennifer Clary John DiBari Tim Ibey Jonathon Haber Jerry Petasek Don Latham Jerry O’Connell Tim Skufca Kelly Durbin Missoula Board of County Commissioners Michele Landquist Jean Curtiss Bill Carey State and Federal Agencies and Large Landowners including: Seeley Lake Ranger District, Lolo National Forest, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Montana Department of Fish Wildlife and Parks, Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, Plum Creek Timber Company Missoula County Office of Rural Initiatives Missoula County Departments Numerous Other Plan Participants Seeley Lake Regional Plan-Adopted October 20, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction ………………………………………………………..1 . Chapter 2: History and Culture………………………………………………..6 Chapter 3: Natural Resources………………………………………………...12 Chapter 4: Economy…………………………………………………………….33 Chapter 5: Population and Housing………………………………………….38 Chapter 6: Community Services and Facilities…………………………....44 Chapter 7: Land Use…………………………………………………………….56 Chapter 8: Plan Implementation………………………………………………83 Maps 1. Plan Area Boundaries 2. Land Ownership 2A. Land Ownership with Montana Legacy Lands 2B. Land Ownership with Conservation Easements 3. Agricultural Soils 4. Steep Slopes 5. Wildland Urban Interface 6. Floodplain 7. Existing Zoning Districts 8. Water District and Sewer District 9. Fire Districts 10. School Districts 11. County Parks 11A. Recreation Sites 12. Land Use Designations-Plan Area 12A. Land Use Designations-North Seeley 12B.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Vehicle Collisions and Habitat Connectivity Along Montana
    ANIMAL-VEHICLE COLLISIONS AND HABITAT CONNECTIVITY ALONG MONTANA HIGHWAY 83 IN THE SEELEY SWAN VALLEY, MONTANA: A RECONNAISSANCE FHWA/MT-06-002/8177 Final Report prepared for THE STATE OF MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION in cooperation with THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION February 2006 prepared by Marcel P. Huijser, Ph.D. Kari E. Gunson Carla Abrams Western Transportation Institute Montana State University RESEARCH PROGRAMS You are free to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work; make derivative works; make commercial use of the work under the condition that you give the original author and sponsor credit. For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you get permission from the sponsor. Your fair use and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Animal-Vehicle Collisions and Habitat Connectivity along Montana Highway 83 in the Seeley-Swan Valley, Montana: a Reconnaissance by Marcel P. Huijser, Ph.D., Research Ecologist, Kari E. Gunson, M.Sc., Research Ecologist and GIS specialist & Carla Abrams, M.Sc., Field Technician Western Transportation Institute College of Engineering, Montana State University PO Box 174250, Bozeman, MT 59717-4250 A report prepared for the MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Montana Department of Transportation PO Box 201001, 2701 Prospect Ave. Helena, MT 59620-1001 in cooperation with the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION February 2006 Animal-Vehicle Collisions and Habitat Connectivity along MT 83 Documentation Page TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Swan Valley Plan
    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Michael Kennedy Barbara Evans Fern Hart MISSOULA CONSOLIDATED PLANNING BOARD Ginny Cass Janene Caywood Helen Cipolato John Fletcher Bonnie Gee Troy Kurth Tom Maclay John Spangler Gerald Stone Sam Warren SWAN VALLEY COMMUNITY CLUB COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMMITTEE Gloria Bush Al Cluck Chris Goodman Michelle Holmes, Recorder Sue Holmes Marita Kirchhofer Len Kobylenski Mike Lake Rolle Matthew Zoe Mohesky, County Planning resource, Office of Planning & Grants Tom Parker Jerry Sorensen, Manager, Land Use Planning, Plum Creek Timber Company Alan “Pete” Taylor, Facilitator Acknowledgments - i SWAN VALLEY-CONDON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN STATEMENT OF PURPOSE This plan, prepared by a committee, and approved by the residents of the Swan Valley establishes community objectives and goals to be used by the Missoula County Office of Planning and Grants and the Board of County Commissioners in guiding future growth in the Swan Valley. The plan includes appendices and references numerous studies that are available at the Swan Valley Community Library. The Swan Valley Community Club will serve as the liaison between the community, agencies and the County Commissioners on land use issues. ii - Statement of Purpose SWAN VALLEY-CONDON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ....................................................................................................... i STATEMENT OF PURPOSE ............................................................................................... ii TABLE OF CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Tra Veler Ser Vices
    TRAVELER SERVICES TRAVELER 88 VISITMT.COM TRAVELER SERVICES www.visitmt.com/travelerservices · 800.847.4868 You’re ready to come to Montana, but you’re wondering—is there really a train there? Will the national parks be open? Are there buses to the ski hills? Use these Traveler Services to show up prepared, informed and practically passing for a local. GETTING HERE It’s easiest to explore Montana by car, so if you aren’t already driving here, make plans to rent a vehicle once you arrive. Fly into larger towns or roll in aboard Amtrak’s Empire Builder (traversing the northern half of the state), then drive a rental from wherever you land. If you plan on hitting backroads and gravel, or even just iffy weather, upgrade to four-wheel-drive for more traction. A high-clearance vehicle is necessary only for a few limited remote destinations like well-off-the-beaten-path trailheads. You can also tour the state via commercial bus lines, which travel to major cities and some smaller towns, or join private bus tours. AIR TRAVEL Direct flights (some seasonal) are available from Seattle, San Francisco, SERVICES TRAVELER Los Angeles, Las Vegas, Salt Lake City, Phoenix, Denver, Minneapolis/St. Paul, Newark, Chicago, Portland and Atlanta. Go to visitmt.com/transportation/air_service for a list of IMPORTANT NUMBERS airports and carriers. Weather Reports Western Montana 406.721.3939 RAIL TRAVEL Amtrak’s Empire Builder runs across northern Montana from Wolf Point Central Montana 406.453.5469 through Havre, Glacier National Park and on to Libby. Bonus: there’s a glass-topped Northeast Montana 406.228.9625 viewing car.
    [Show full text]