Model Mélange

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Model Mélange Model Mélange Physical Models of Peptides and Proteins In the Model Mélange activity, you will visit different stations – each featuring a variety of different physical models of peptides or proteins. The learning objectives for this activity are: Explore and analyze levels of protein structure – secondary, tertiary and quaternary structure. Primary structure will be explored briefly in the context of secondary structure. Compare and contrast different model formats. Each format provides useful, but different, information regarding the structure. The worksheets that follow will guide your exploration of each protein structure. Stations 1 and 2 can be done in any order, and stations 3 and 4 can also be done in any order. The CPK Color Scheme The standard colors of different atom types….established by Corey, Pauling (as in Linus) and Kolton. Note that hydrogen atoms are typically NOT Carbon is grey (or black) displayed in these models. There are two reasons for this: Oxygen is red X-ray crystallography, which has been Nitrogen is blue used to determine the structure of many of the models, does not resolve the Hydrogen is white position of hydrogen atoms. Phosphorus is orange Because there are so many hydrogen atoms in many structures, if they were Sulfur is yellow displayed, most of the rest of the structure would be obscured. Zinc is green Station 1: Secondary Structure: α Helices There are three different depictions of the α helix at this station: 1. An α helix construction kit: standard CPK colors, hydrogen bonds are depicted by metal posts with white balls. The green dots are on the central carbon atom (the α carbon) of each amino acid. This is the carbon atom to which the sidechain, amino and carboxyl groups are attached. Amino acid subunits are joined by magnets. 2. A static α helix without sidechains: CPK colors with green dot on α carbon. 3. A static α helix with sidechains: this is the same model as #2, but the sidechains have been added. Note that the backbone atoms are colored in light CPK colors (light grey is carbon, pale blue is nitrogen, pink is oxygen). Sidechains are in normal CPK colors. Alpha carbon atoms are identified by a green dot. Use these models to work through the activities below and answer the questions. 1. Begin by constructing your α Helix Construction Kit©. Identify the amino (N-terminal) and carboxy (C-terminal) ends of the α helix. How are they depicted in the models? See if you can find them on the two static models as well. 2. Compare all 3 α helix models. a. How many amino acids are depicted in each structure? ___ b. How many hydrogen bonds stabilize each structure? ___ 3. Go back to examining the α Helix Construction Kit©. a. What are the four atoms that make up the repeating structural unit of the α helix? b. Which of those atoms comprise the continuous backbone chain? 4. Describe (or draw) the path the backbone takes in 3D space. 5. What feature contributes most to the stability of the α helix? Why do you think this? 6. Using the static α helix with sidechains and beginning at the N-terminal end, determine the amino acid sequence of this peptide. 7. Examine the model and predict which “face” of the helix is directed toward the center of the protein. (Recall that: 1. Due to the helix shape, the “face” will exist on a curved plane, and 2. the protein folds in the aqueous environment of the cell.) Identify the amino acids on this “face”. Also identify the amino acids which are on the “face” exposed to the outside of the protein. a. Amino acids directed toward the inside: b. Amino acids directed toward the outside: c. What principles of chemistry influenced your selection of these amino acids? 8. Summarize what you have learned about α helices. Station 2: Secondary Structure: β Sheets There are three different depictions of the β sheet at this station: 1. 2-stranded β Sheet Construction Kit©: standard CPK colors, hydrogen bonds are depicted by metal posts with white balls. The yellow dots are on the central carbon atom (the α carbon) of each amino acid. This is the carbon atom to which the sidechain, amino and carboxyl groups are attached. 2. Static, 3-stranded β sheet without sidechains: CPK colors, yellow dot on α carbon. 3. Static, 3-stranded β sheet with sidechains: this is the same model as #2, but the sidechains have been added. Note that the backbone atoms are colored in light CPK colors (light grey is carbon, pale blue is nitrogen, pink is oxygen). Sidechains are in normal CPK colors. Alpha carbon atoms are identified by a yellow dot. Use these models to work through the activities below and answer the questions. First analyze and compare the two static models, and use them to answer questions 1-8. 1. Identify the N-terminal and C-terminal ends of the peptides that make up the static three- stranded β sheet, without sidechains. How did you determine their identity? 2. β sheets can be either parallel (all strands running in the same direction from N-terminus to C-terminus) or antiparallel (alternating strands are oriented in the opposite direction). Which type of β sheet is represented in the static model without sidechains? Justify your answer. 3. Look at both static, 3-stranded models. Examine if any of the strands appear to be continuous or individual. Describe your observations. 4. Which type of β sheet pattern(s) would contain a ‘hairpin turn’ (looped) structure? Why? 5. What role do sidechains play in the hydrogen-bonding that stabilizes protein secondary structure? 6. How many amino acids are there in the longest β strand in the static models? ____ 7. Use the static β sheet with sidechains model and locate the N-terminal end of the continuous strand that contains the ‘hairpin turn’ loop. Beginning with the N-terminal end, what is the sequence of the first eight amino acids of this peptide? 8. What pattern do you notice about the orientation of each successive amino acid sidechain relative to the plane of the β sheet? Use the β Sheet Construction Kit© to construct an antiparallel β sheet and answer questions 9-13. 9. How many hydrogen bonds stabilize this structure? _____ 10. What are the four atoms that make up the repeating structural unit (backbone) of this model of the β sheet? 11. Describe (or draw) the path the backbone takes in 3D space. 12. Examine the static model with sidechains. Predict which “face” of the sheet is directed toward the center of the protein. (Recall that the protein folds in the aqueous environment of the cell.) Identify the amino acids on this “face”. Also identify the amino acids which are on the “face” exposed to the outside of the protein. a. Amino acids directed toward the inside: b. Amino acids directed toward the outside: c. What principles of chemistry influenced your selection of these amino acids? 13. Summarize what you have learned about β sheets. Station 3: Tertiary Structure: Zinc Fingers This station focuses on tertiary structure by analyzing models of zinc fingers. Zinc fingers are small protein motifs, only 20-30 amino acids in length. Zinc fingers can play many roles, including assisting in protein folding and stabilization, as well as DNA recognition. Zinc finger motifs are often found in proteins that interact with DNA, like transcription factors. (You can see a zinc finger in association with DNA in one of the zinc finger models on display). Zinc fingers share a common structure which includes a two-stranded β sheet and a single α helix. A zinc atom stabilizes the secondary structure and is coordinated by four amino acids – a combination of cysteines and histidines. These particular zinc finger models have two cysteines and two histidines. Perhaps you have heard the story of the seven blind men and the elephant? Each man felt a different part of the elephant and described it, then argued about which description was right. Another man resolved the argument by pointing out that each man had only seen a part of the elephant, and that an elephant included ALL of their descriptions. Similar to the elephant story, there are several models of zinc fingers at this station. Each depicts different aspects of the protein. When trying to tell a story about how a protein functions, scientists determine which features of the protein they want to emphasize, then choose the depiction that best illustrates those features. Match each physical model of the zinc finger to the correct format listed below, then list one positive and one negative feature of that format. A. α carbon backbone format, no side chains Advantage: Disadvantage: B. α carbon backbone format, with side chains Advantage: Disadvantage: C. Spacefill format Advantage: Disadvantage: D. Surface format Advantage: Disadvantage: E. α carbon backbone format, with selected sidechains Advantage: Disadvantage: If you only had one model format to use in your classroom, which format would you find most useful, and why? Station 4: Quaternary Structure Some, but not all, proteins contain multiple peptides. This station allows you to explore several proteins that demonstrate this quaternary structure, as well as a few that lack quaternary structure. Examine each of these protein models, and analyze the following: 1. How many subunits are in the protein? How can you tell? 2. Based on your answer to #1, does the protein have quaternary structure? 3. Are there α helices in the protein? (If so, few or many?) 4. Are there β sheets in the protein? (If so, few or many?) Aquaporin GFP (Green Fluorescent Protein) Hemoglobin Beta-Globin Influenza HA (Hemagglutinin) MHC (Major Histocompatibility Complex) F0 complex (from ATP synthase) Station 5: Structure Challenges! α Helices and β Sheets: 1.
Recommended publications
  • Conformational Transition of H-Shaped Branched Polymers
    1 Conformational Transition of H-shaped Branched Polymers Ashok Kumar Dasmahapatra* and Venkata Mahanth Sanka Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati – 781039, Assam, India PACS number(s): 83.80.Rs, 87.10.Rt, 82.20.Wt, 61.25.he * Corresponding author: Phone: +91-361-258-2273; Fax: +91-361-258-2291; Email address: [email protected] 2 ABSTRACT We report dynamic Monte Carlo simulation on conformational transition of H-shaped branched polymers by varying main chain (backbone) and side chain (branch) length. H- shaped polymers in comparison with equivalent linear polymers exhibit a depression of theta temperature accompanying with smaller chain dimensions. We observed that the effect of branches on backbone dimension is more pronounced than the reverse, and is attributed to the conformational heterogeneity prevails within the molecule. With increase in branch length, backbone is slightly stretched out in coil and globule state. However, in the pre-collapsed (cf. crumpled globule) state, backbone size decreases with the increase of branch length. We attribute this non-monotonic behavior as the interplay between excluded volume interaction and intra-chain bead-bead attractive interaction during collapse transition. Structural analysis reveals that the inherent conformational heterogeneity promotes the formation of a collapsed structure with segregated backbone and branch units (resembles to “sandwich” or “Janus” morphology) rather an evenly distributed structure comprising of all the units. The shape of the collapsed globule becomes more spherical with increasing either backbone or branch length. 3 I. INTRODUCTION Branched polymers are commodious in preparing tailor-made materials for various applications such as in the area of catalysis1, nanomaterials2, and biomedicines3.
    [Show full text]
  • Electrically Sensing Hachimoji DNA Nucleotides Through a Hybrid Graphene/H-BN Nanopore Cite This: Nanoscale, 2020, 12, 18289 Fábio A
    Nanoscale View Article Online PAPER View Journal | View Issue Electrically sensing Hachimoji DNA nucleotides through a hybrid graphene/h-BN nanopore Cite this: Nanoscale, 2020, 12, 18289 Fábio A. L. de Souza, †a Ganesh Sivaraman, †b,g Maria Fyta, †c Ralph H. Scheicher, *†d Wanderlã L. Scopel †e and Rodrigo G. Amorim *†f The feasibility of synthesizing unnatural DNA/RNA has recently been demonstrated, giving rise to new perspectives and challenges in the emerging field of synthetic biology, DNA data storage, and even the search for extraterrestrial life in the universe. In line with this outstanding potential, solid-state nanopores have been extensively explored as promising candidates to pave the way for the next generation of label- free, fast, and low-cost DNA sequencing. In this work, we explore the sensitivity and selectivity of a gra- phene/h-BN based nanopore architecture towards detection and distinction of synthetic Hachimoji nucleobases. The study is based on a combination of density functional theory and the non-equilibrium Green’s function formalism. Our findings show that the artificial nucleobases are weakly binding to the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. device, indicating a short residence time in the nanopore during translocation. Significant changes in the Received 9th June 2020, electron transmission properties of the device are noted depending on which artificial nucleobase resides Accepted 7th August 2020 in the nanopore, leading to a sensitivity in distinction of up to 80%. Our results thus indicate that the pro- DOI: 10.1039/d0nr04363j posed nanopore device setup can qualitatively discriminate synthetic nucleobases, thereby opening up rsc.li/nanoscale the feasibility of sequencing even unnatural DNA/RNA.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Architectonics: an Invitation to Structural Biology
    THE ANATOMICAL RECORD (NEW ANAT.) 261:198–216, 2000 FEATURE ARTICLE The New Architectonics: An Invitation To Structural Biology CLARENCE E. SCHUTT* AND UNO LINDBERG The philosophy of art might offer an epistemological basis for talking about the complexity of biological molecules in a meaningful way. The analysis of artistic compositions requires the resolution of intrinsic tensions between disparate sensory categories—color, line and form—not unlike those encountered in looking at the surfaces of protein molecules, where charge, polarity, hydrophobicity, and shape compete for our attentions. Complex living systems exhibit behaviors such as contraction waves moving along muscle fibers, or shivers passing through the growth cones of migrating neurons, that are easy to describe with common words, but difficult to explain in terms of the language of chemistry. The problem follows from a lack of everyday experience with processes that move towards equilibrium by switching between crystalline order and chain-like disorder, a commonplace occurrence in the submicroscopic world of proteins. Since most of what is understood about protein function comes from studies of isolated macromolecules in solution, a serious gap exists between what we know and what we would like to know about organized biological systems. Closing this gap can be achieved by recognizing that protein molecules reside in gradients of Gibbs free energy, where local forces and movements can be large compared with Brownian motion. Architectonics, a term borrowed from the philosophical literature, symbolizes the eventual union of the structure of theories—how our minds construct the world—with the theory of structures—or how stability is maintained in the chaotic world of microsystems.
    [Show full text]
  • De Novo Nucleic Acids: a Review of Synthetic Alternatives to DNA and RNA That Could Act As † Bio-Information Storage Molecules
    life Review De Novo Nucleic Acids: A Review of Synthetic Alternatives to DNA and RNA That Could Act as y Bio-Information Storage Molecules Kevin G Devine 1 and Sohan Jheeta 2,* 1 School of Human Sciences, London Metropolitan University, 166-220 Holloway Rd, London N7 8BD, UK; [email protected] 2 Network of Researchers on the Chemical Evolution of Life (NoR CEL), Leeds LS7 3RB, UK * Correspondence: [email protected] This paper is dedicated to Professor Colin B Reese, Daniell Professor of Chemistry, Kings College London, y on the occasion of his 90th Birthday. Received: 17 November 2020; Accepted: 9 December 2020; Published: 11 December 2020 Abstract: Modern terran life uses several essential biopolymers like nucleic acids, proteins and polysaccharides. The nucleic acids, DNA and RNA are arguably life’s most important, acting as the stores and translators of genetic information contained in their base sequences, which ultimately manifest themselves in the amino acid sequences of proteins. But just what is it about their structures; an aromatic heterocyclic base appended to a (five-atom ring) sugar-phosphate backbone that enables them to carry out these functions with such high fidelity? In the past three decades, leading chemists have created in their laboratories synthetic analogues of nucleic acids which differ from their natural counterparts in three key areas as follows: (a) replacement of the phosphate moiety with an uncharged analogue, (b) replacement of the pentose sugars ribose and deoxyribose with alternative acyclic, pentose and hexose derivatives and, finally, (c) replacement of the two heterocyclic base pairs adenine/thymine and guanine/cytosine with non-standard analogues that obey the Watson–Crick pairing rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Chain Structure Characterization
    CHAIN STRUCTURE CHARACTERIZATION Gregory Beaucage and Amit S. Kulkarni Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221-0012 I. Introduction to Structure in Synthetic Macromolecules a) Dimensionality and Statistical Descriptions b) Chain Persistence and the Kuhn Unit c) Coil Structure and Chain Scaling Transitions d) Measures of Coil Size Rg and Rh II. Local Structure and its Ramifications a) Tacticity c) Branching d) Crystallization e) Hyperbranched Polymers III. Summary 1 I. Introduction to Structure in Synthetic Macromolecules a) Dimensionality and Statistical Descriptions Synthetic polymers display some physical characteristics that we can identify as native to this class of materials, particularly shear thinning rheology, rubber elasticity, and chain folded crystals. These properties are inherent to long-chain linear and weakly branched molecules and are not drastically different across a wide range of chemical make-ups. We can consider these features to define synthetic macromolecules as a distinct category of materials. The realization of this special category of materials necessitated the definition of a structural model broad enough to encompass nylon to polyethylene yet specific enough that detailed analytically available features could be used to define the major properties of interest, especially those native to this class of materials. This structural model for polymer chains is based on the random walk statistics observed by Robert Brown in studies of pollen grains and explained by Einstein in 1905. It is a trivial exercise to construct a random walk on a cubic lattice using a PC, Figure 1. From such a walk we can observe certain features of the general model for a polymer chain.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Does TNA Cross-Pair More Strongly with RNA Than with DNA? an Answer from X-Ray Analysis**
    Angewandte Chemie Nucleic Acids Why Does TNA Cross-Pair More Strongly with RNA Than with DNA? An Answer From X-ray Analysis** Pradeep S. Pallan, Christopher J. Wilds, Zdzislaw Wawrzak, Ramanarayanan Krishnamurthy, Albert Eschenmoser, and Martin Egli* Scheme 1. Configuration, atom numbering, and backbone torsion angle definition in a) TNA and b) DNA. Research directed toward a chemical etiology of nucleic acid structure has recently established that l-a-threofuranosyl (3’!2’) nucleic acid (TNA) is an efficient Watson–Crickbase- TNA ligands.[4] Nitrogenous analogues of TNA in which pairing system capable of informational cross-pairing with either O3’ or O2’ is substituted by an NH group are equally both RNA and DNA.[1–3] TNA is constitutionally the simplest efficient Watson–Crickbase-pairing systems; they also cross- oligonucleotide-type nucleic acid system found so far that pair with TNA, RNA, and DNA.[5] It was recently shown that possesses this capability. Its cross-pairing with RNA is certain DNA polymerases are able to copy a TNA template stronger than with DNA.[1, 2] The backbone of TNA is shorter sequence, albeit of limited length and at a slower rate than than that of DNA and RNA since the sugar moiety in TNA with a DNA template.[6] Moreover, a DNA polymerase has contains only four carbon atoms and the phosphodiester been identified that is capable of significant TNA synthesis.[7] groups are attached to the 2’- and 3’-positions of the The combination of a DNA-dependent TNA polymerase and threofuranose ring, as opposed to the 3’- and 5’-positions as a TNA-directed DNA polymerase may enable in vitro in DNA and RNA (Scheme 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Bottlebrush Polymers in the Melt and Polyelectrolytes in Solution Share Common Structural Features
    Bottlebrush polymers in the melt and polyelectrolytes in solution share common structural features Joel M. Sarapasa, Tyler B. Martina, Alexandros Chremosa, Jack F. Douglasa, and Kathryn L. Beersa,1 aMaterials Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 Edited by Krzysztof Matyjaszewski, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, and approved January 29, 2020 (received for review September 24, 2019) Uncharged bottlebrush polymer melts and highly charged poly- the exponent λ ranges from 1/3 to 2/5 as backbone length is electrolytes in solution exhibit correlation peaks in scattering increased. A recent simulation study confirmed the finding, λ measurements and simulations. Given the striking superficial of 2/5, in the limit of long backbones (17). Interestingly, similar similarities of these scattering features, there may be a deeper characteristic features are also found in polyelectrolyte solu- structural interrelationship in these chemically different classes of tions and the nature of their origin has triggered an ongoing materials. Correspondingly, we constructed a library of isotopically theoretical discussion, including the origin and meaning of the labeled bottlebrush molecules and measured the bottlebrush so-called “polyelectrolyte peak” observed in scattering mea- correlation peak position q* = 2π=ξ by neutron scattering and in surements (28). The similarity of these two classes of materials simulations. We find that the correlation length scales with the has been noted, although largely in passing (29–31). ξ ∼ c−0.47 backbone concentration, BB , in striking accord with the scaling Here, we take advantage of a variety of polymerizations to of ξ with polymer concentration cP in semidilute polyelectrolyte so- access a library of materials with varying backbone chemistries, ξ ∼ c−1=2 lutions ( P ).
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture1541230922.Pdf
    MODULE-1 Introduction: -The macromolecules are divided between biological and non-biological materials. The biological polymers form the very foundation of life and intelligence, and provide much of the food on which man exists. The non-biological polymers are primarily the synthetic materials used for plastics, fibers and elastomers but a few naturally occurring polymers such as rubber wool and cellulose are included in this class. Today these substances are truly indispensable to mankind because these are essential to his clothing,shelter, transportation, communication as well as the conveniences of modern living. Polymer Biological Non- biological Proteins, starch, wool plastics, fibers easterners Note: Polymer is not said to be as macromolecule, because polymer is composedof repeating units whereas the macromolecules may not be composed of repeating units. Definition: A polymer is a large molecule built up by the repetition of small, simple chemical units known as repeating units which are held together by chemical covalent bonds. These repeating units are called monomer Polymer – ---- poly + meres Many parts In some cases, the repetition is linear but in other cases the chains are branched on interconnected to form three dimensional networks. The repeating units of the polymer are usually equivalent on nearly equivalent to the monomer on the starting material from which the polymer is formed. A higher polymer is one in which the number of repeating units is in excess of about 1000 Degree of polymerization (DP): - The no of repeating units or monomer units in the chain of a polymer is called degree of polymerization (DP) . The molecular weight of an addition polymer is the product of the molecular weight of the repeating unit and the degree of polymerization (DP).
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Properties of Linear-Hyperbranched Graft
    Statistical properties of linear-hyperbranched graft copolymers prepared via ”hypergrafting” of ABm monomers from linear B-functional core chains: A Molecular Dynamics simulation Hauke Rabbel,1 Holger Frey,2 and Friederike Schmid3, ∗ 1Leibniz-Institut f¨ur Polymerforschung Dresden e.V., Hohe Straße 6, 01069 Dresden 2Institut f¨ur Organische Chemie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universit¨at Mainz, D-55099 Mainz, Germany 3Institut f¨ur Physik, Johannes Gutenberg-Universit¨at Mainz, D-55099 Mainz, Germany (Dated: June 11, 2018) The reaction of ABm monomers (m = 2, 3) with a multifunctional Bf -type polymer chain (”hy- pergrafting”) is studied by coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations. The ABm monomers are hypergrafted using the slow monomer addition strategy. Fully dendronized, i.e., perfectly branched polymers are also simulated for comparison. The degree of branching DB of the molecules obtained with the ”hypergrafting’ process critically depends on the rate with which monomers attach to inner monomers compared to terminal monomers. This ratio is more favorable if the ABm monomers have lower reactivity, since the free monomers then have time to diffuse inside the chain. Configurational chain properties are also determined, showing that the stretching of the polymer backbone as a con- sequence of the ”hypergrafting” procedure is much less pronounced than for perfectly dendronized chains. Furthermore, we analyze the scaling of various quantities with molecular weight M for large M (M > 100). The Wiener index scales as M 2.3, which is intermediate between linear chains (M 3) and perfectly branched polymers (M 2 ln(M)). The polymer size, characterized by the radius of ν gyration Rg or the hydrodynamic radius Rh, is found to scale as Rg,h ∝ M with ν ≈ 0.38, which lies between the exponent of diffusion limited aggregation (ν = 0.4) and the mean-field exponent predicted by Konkolewicz and coworkers (ν = 0.33).
    [Show full text]
  • REPLICATION of DOUBLE-STRAND NUCLEIC ACIDS Structure
    REPLICATION OF DOUBLE-STRAND NUCLEIC ACIDS BY HERBERT JEHLE PHYSICS DEPARTMENT, THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, WASHINGTON, D. C. Communicated by Linus Pauling, April 20, 1965 The conventional explanation of replication of double-strand nucleic acid sug- gested that the parental double-strand Watson-Crick helix, forming the stem of a Y-like structure, opens up at the Y juncture and that it is there that the two semi- conservative replica arms of the Y originate. The Watson-Crick H bond base- pair specificity was supposed to operate here so discrintinately that only nucleotides whose bases are complementary to the bases of the just recently separated parental strands are admitted to the formation of complementary filial strands, the parental strands acting as templates. The hydrogen bonds, particularly at the time and place where the parental strands separate, are, however, quite unreliable in achieving correct complementary base choice without fail.1 Besides, the two nucleic acid single strands lack struc- tural definition exactly where, as a help for correct nucleotide incorporation, it would be needed most, i.e., at the Y juncture. One has thus to look for a way which would guarantee accurate selection of filial nucleotides in such a replication process. When an enzyme is proposed to perform that task, one is faced with the question of what the structural conditions are which make such an enzyme work. In 1963 we proposed a scheme which may help toward understanding accurate rep- lication.2 It involved the hypothesis of a reinforcement of the Watson-Crick structure by molecules (presumably polymerases3 and some cations) laid snugly into its two grooves in a manner as suggested in another connection by Wilkins4 when he brought evidence indicating that histones or protamines associate with nu- cleic acids in their grooves.
    [Show full text]
  • Variation of Protein Backbone Amide Resonance by Electrostatic Field 1
    Variation of protein backbone amide resonance by electrostatic field John N. Sharley, University of Adelaide. arXiv:1512.05488 [email protected] Table of Contents 1 Abstract 2 2 Key phrases 2 3 Notation 3 4 Overview 3 5 Introduction 4 6 Software 5 7 Results and discussion 5 7.1 Constrained to O-C-N plane 5 7.2 Partial sp3 hybridization at N 11 7.3 Other geometry variations 13 7.4 Torsional steering 13 7.5 Backbone amide nitrogen as hydrogen bond acceptor 15 7.6 RAHB chains in electrostatic field 16 7.7 Electrostatic field vectors at backbone amides 19 7.8 Protein beta sheet 20 7.9 RAHB protein helices 21 7.10 Proline 22 7.11 Permittivity 22 7.12 Protein folding, conformational and allosteric change 23 7.13 Unstructured regions 23 7.14 Sources of electrostatic field variation in proteins 24 7.15 Absence of charged residues 24 7.16 Development of methods 24 8 Hypotheses 25 8.1 Beta sheet 25 8.2 Amyloid fibril 26 8.3 Polyproline helices types I and II 27 8.4 Protein folding 28 8.4.1 Overview 28 8.4.2 Peptide group resonance drives protein folding 29 8.4.3 Specification of fold separated from how to fold 30 8.4.4 Comparison with earlier backbone-based theory 30 8.4.5 Observation 32 8.4.6 Summary 33 8.5 Molecular chaperones and protein complexes 33 8.6 Nitrogenous base pairing 34 9 Conclusion 35 10 Acknowledgements 37 11 References 38 12 Appendix 1 42 13 Appendix 2 62 1 1 Abstract Amide resonance is found to be sensitive to electrostatic field with component parallel or antiparallel to the amide C-N bond, an effect we refer to here as EVPR-CN.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Specification of Homopolymer of Vinylbenzyl-Lactose-Amide in Aqueous Solution
    Polymer Journal, Vol. 31, No. 7, pp 590-594 (1999) Molecular Specification of Homopolymer of Vinylbenzyl-Lactose-Amide in Aqueous Solution Isao WATAOKA, Hiroshi URAKAWA, Kazukiyo KOBAYASHI,* Kohji OHNo,** Takeshi FUKUDA,** Toshihiro AKAIKE,*** and Kanji KAJIW ARA t Faculty of Engineering and Design, Kyoto Institute of Technology, Matsugasaki, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606--8585, Japan *Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464--8603, Japan **Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Uji, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan ***Faculty of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Midori-ku, Yokohama 227--8501, Japan (Received November 30, 1998) ABSTRACT: The lactose-carrying polystyrene derivative, PYLA, is known as the material suitable for the incubation of liver cells and for drug delivery systems. PYLA was dissolved in 0.1 M urea aqueous solution, and its structure was analyzed from the results of small-angle X-ray scattering and the molecular modeling. PYLA was found to have the shape of a molecular bottle brush in solution, composed of a large pseudo helix of polystyrene backbone. The amphiphilic nature of the backbone and side chains is thought to determine the backbone conformation. KEY WORDS Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering I Polymacromonomer I Glycopolymer I Lactose I Recent advance in the precise polymerization tech­ (or oligomers) with a vinyl end group, the radical nique has resulted in synthesizing many novel function­ polymerization results in polydisperse polymacromono­ al polymers, most of which mimic biopolymers. Those mers. The living radical polymerization is an alternative novel polymers are often found to be physiologically route to prepare polymacromonomers with less poly­ more active than the corresponding biopolymers.
    [Show full text]