From the Lane to the City: the Impact of the Orangi Pilot Project’S Low Cost Sanitation Model
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
From the Lane to the City: The Impact of the Orangi Pilot Project’s Low Cost Sanitation Model A WaterAid report by Akbar Zaidi From the Lane to the City: The Impact of the Orangi Pilot Project’s Low Cost Sanitation Model WaterAid/Caroline Penn WaterAid/Caroline This report is one of a series which analyse WaterAid’s experience in supporting integrated water, sanitation and hygiene education projects in developing countries. Other reports in the series are: WAMMA: Empowerment in practice Hitosa Water Supply: A people’s project India: Making government funding work harder Contracts or Partnerships: Working through local NGOs in Ghana and Nepal WaterAid Men dig a trench and lay pipes through compacted sewage, earth and rubbish in Prince Consort House Hassanpura, Faisalabad. 27-29 Albert Embankment London SE1 7UB Telephone: +44 (0)20 7793 4500 Fax: +44 (0)20 7793 4545 Website: www.wateraid.org.uk Charity Reg No 288701 Published by WaterAid London June 2001 All rights reserved. Cover Photo: WaterAid/Caroline Penn 2 From the Lane to the City: The Impact of the Orangi Pilot Project’s Low Cost Sanitation Model From the Lane to the City: The Impact of the Orangi Pilot Project’s Low Cost Sanitation Model A WaterAid Report TAJIKISTAN CHINA Written by Akbar Zaidi Edited by Eric Gutierrez and Virginia Roaf Mingora June 2001 Rawalpindi AFGHANISTAN Faisalabad ➛ 0 150 300 Kms N Multan Contents Lodhran Uch INDIA Introduction 4 PAKISTAN OPP Principles of Good Practice 8 Karachi IRAN Problems of Replication 13 OPP – The Wider Impact 16 Conclusion 19 List of Acronyms and Terms 21 Bibliography 22 Acknowledgements 23 Boxes and Tables Akhtar Hameed Khan and the OPP’s Growing Influence 12 The Anjuman Samaji Behbood (ASB) Experience in Faisalabad 15 3 From the Lane to the City: The Impact of the Orangi Pilot Project’s Low Cost Sanitation Model Introduction In 1994, WaterAid started a had radically changed the Orangi education. By 1988, four relationship with one of Pakistan’s settlement. Gone were the murky, autonomous institutions were in most influential non-governmental stinking open sewers that place to manage the OPP’s organisations (NGO) and perhaps crisscrossed the settlement and expanding concerns. The main the world’s best-known non- which posed considerable health OPP Research and Training governmental project in the large- and physical hazards to its Institute (OPP-RTI) took charge of scale provision of sanitation for the residents. Mobility improved the Low Cost Sanitation urban poor – the Orangi Pilot within the community both for Programme and the Education Project (OPP). This relationship goods and human traffic, boosting Programme. The Orangi was primarily aimed at learning home-based enterprises and small- Charitable Trust (OCT) ran the lessons from the ‘OPP experience,’ scale trading. Infant mortality rate Family Enterprise Economic and in funding projects to replicate fell from 130 per thousand live Programme that provided cheap this process inside and outside births in 1982 to 37 per thousand in and readily accessible credit. The Pakistan. Five years later, as 1991, which was far faster than it Karachi Health and Social WaterAid was to carry out some had fallen in Karachi or the rest of Development Association form of assessment of this funding, Pakistan.(Badshah, 1996: 49; and it received a proposal for a broader Reed and Vines, 1992a:19)4 The 1 The proposal was submitted by the OPP study on the impact of the OPP.1 availability of cleaner and extended and the London-based International Wishing to contribute to an space in front of houses had a Institute for Environment and Development independent critical assessment of significant social and recreational (IIED) in early 1999. the OPP, WaterAid funded the impact as well. New and relatively 2 Karachi is Pakistan’s economic centre with broader study, from which this safer play areas for children a total population of over 9 million 5 abbreviated report is derived. emerged. Women were able to residents. move around more freely and be The OPP started in 1980 in the 3 It is not very clear by how much the OPP visited by friends and relatives, depressed and crowded Orangi low-cost sanitation model is cheaper than leading some to comment that it settlement, one of Karachi’s2 most other alternatives because of difficulties in improved marriage prospects for blighted districts and its largest comparison. However, some studies have young women.6 Such success has katchi abadi with a population of 1.2 shown that sewer construction in Orangi naturally drawn attention from the million. Led by the renowned Dr are one-seventh the cost compared to those world over. The OPP experience is, Akhtar Hameed Khan (see box constructed by the Karachi Metropolitan in WaterAid and many other Corporation (KMC) due to the p.12), the OPP evolved in just a few development agencies’ view, a simplification of the technical design and years to be a remarkable self- most impressive demonstration of the elimination of middlemen, contractors funded, self-administered and self- just how much urban poor and the pay-off to professionals like maintained grassroots movement communities can contribute to the engineers. (Siddiqui and Rashid, 1997). relying on nothing more than the development of quite complex 4 The improvement in infant mortality rates resources and skills of its urban large-scale infrastructure projects. can be attributed to many factors, including poor constituents using local It also presented a challenge to reduction of solid wastes, the reduction of materials and labour in building dominant development paradigms children defecating in the streets, etc. But hundreds of kilometres of that are too technical, too reliant on most observers and official sources agree extremely low-cost underground government and donor support, that the most important factor is the sewers.3 By April 2001 these had construction of underground sewers. and which generally treated poor benefited 92,184 families in 6,134 communities as simply the objects 5 In the Manzoor Colony where an 8-12 foot lanes, representing almost 90% of of, rather than the central force of wide concrete case was built on a 2050-foot the entire settlement. There have nala local enthusiasts acquired a continuous development. also been 409 collector sewers built, cricket pitch. and collectively the community Over time, the OPP expanded 6 It is customary in Pakistani society for the have invested Rs. 82.141 million beyond sanitation provision to potential husband’s parents and elders to (£924,000) in their sewerage cover programmes for health, visit the house of their prospective system. By the late 1980s, the OPP credit, low-cost housing and daughter-in-law. 4 From the Lane to the City: The Impact of the Orangi Pilot Project’s Low Cost Sanitation Model WaterAid/Caroline Penn WaterAid/Caroline (KHASDA) implemented the Health Programme. And finally there was the OPP Society that administered funding from the Infaq Foundation, a Pakistani charity, for the OPP organisations. The OPP, however, was as controversial as it was popular. Despite its ostensible success and tremendous potential, the ‘OPP experience’ was perceived not to be replicable on any serious scale outside of Karachi. It faced a number of critics – from government, the international donor community, as well as Pakistani NGOs – who posed a wide array of arguments that downplayed and sometimes denied outright the OPP’s claims to success. There were critics who pointed out that the OPP experience was specific to Orangi. Orangi has a natural slope, which made secondary sewer lanes and collection points dispensable to a certain extent. Had Orangi been on flat terrain, the project may have had to rely on government and donor support from the outset. Furthermore, most Orangi Children cross over the sewage flow in Mansoor colony, Karachi. householders were acknowledged owner-occupiers, who had more community and government was criticism of NGOs that thrive on incentive and security of tenure its firm, resolute and active foreign funding which, as a result, than renters or squatters to invest rejection of any form of subsidies reinforces development paradigms their hard-earned income in sewer or funding for what it termed as that depend on complex, technical construction. Others say that the internal7 development work for inputs from highly-paid OPP was too ‘Dr Khan-centred’, poor communities. The OPP consultants and organisations and reliant on his involvement. stressed that the responsibility to rather than rely on what is Government engineers and fund the internal component rests available from communities. The industry professionals initially solely with the community. It OPP has in fact developed a doubted the quality and technical believes that government or donor reputation for taking on and standards of the OPP-facilitated money, when used for internal challenging even international sewer lines. Some critics look at development, is a corrupting donor organisations. It called the sustainability, arguing that OPP- system that undermines the initiated community organisations indigenous and self-motivated created through this process do not 7 The OPP used the term internal to refer to initiatives of communities. They actively continue once construction any form of development work that the condemned NGOs that readily work has been completed. people, communities, and lanes are accept donor money as contractors supposed to do, while external refers to the But perhaps the main point that who make a business out of responsibility of government. This is brought the OPP into conflict with development work. The OPP discussed in the following section of this a number of NGOs, the donor became known for its consistent report. 5 From the Lane to the City: The Impact of the Orangi Pilot Project’s Low Cost Sanitation Model Urban Basic Services (UBS) Most of the many materials on the longer-term and relatively more programme – nominated by the OPP are documentation assembled objective perspective.