Sandwiching in History Tour Junction Bridge, Arkansas River, Little Rock & North Little Rock June 5Th, 2020 By: Callie Williams

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sandwiching in History Tour Junction Bridge, Arkansas River, Little Rock & North Little Rock June 5Th, 2020 By: Callie Williams Sandwiching In History Tour Junction Bridge, Arkansas River, Little Rock & North Little Rock June 5th, 2020 By: Callie Williams Introduction Good afternoon, my name is Callie Williams, Education and Outreach Coordinator for the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program. Welcome to the June 2020 Sandwiching in History tour of the Junction Bridge in downtown Little Rock. This month we are presenting the history of the Junction Bridge over the Arkansas River between the historic Argenta community of North Little Rock and the downtown historic core of Little Rock. Much of the research for this script is based on previous work done by Bryan McDade, Curator of Collections at the Mosaic Templars Cultural Center in downtown Little Rock. The city of Little Rock was named after a geological formation found along the banks of the Arkansas River known as “La Petite Roche”, or the little rock. This name was given to an outcropping of rocks near a low landing area by early French explorers of the area, including Jean-Baptise Benard de la Harpe, who is the namesake of the nearby La Harpe boulevard. The little rock was in contrast to the much larger “Big Rock” bluff found just a couple of miles up the river along the northern riverbank. The big rock bluffs in North Little Rock were a large natural landmark for the area. The Native American tribes of the region used both the Big Rock and the Little Rock as prominent landmarks for travel through the area. The plateau along the top of the Big Rock eventually became the home of the former Fort Logan H. Roots military base and is now home to the Towbin Healthcare Center of the Department of Veterans Affairs. A remnant of the namesake little rock formation is still visible just beside the foot of the Junction Bridge in Riverfront Park in downtown Little Rock. The central Arkansas region was home to the Quapaw people when the first European explorers reached the region in the early 1700s. Before the Quapaw living along the Arkansas River were forced to leave in 1824, there was a community of mixed Quapaw-French families that lived in the area of what is now Little Rock, which inspired the name “Quapaw Quarter” for Little Rock’s historic downtown neighborhoods. Early French explorers in the area referred to the small outcropping of rock along the south bank of the river as “le Petit Rocher” (the Little Rock) and the name appeared on maps of the area by 1800. The first immigrant settler near the Little Rock was William Lewis who built a cabin along the River in 1812. Although he didn’t stay in the area for long, but he did file a claim on the land. A permanent settlement was founded in the spring of 1820 near the rock, with a post office established under the name Little Rock at the site by March of the same year. Soon, this new settlement drew the attention of land speculators who recognized the value of the site as an up and coming trade and political center. These speculators soon staked dubious claims to the town, even renaming its “Arkopolis”, and started selling lots. Another added issue was the planned move of the territorial capitol to Little Rock in June of 1821. The land claims were eventually settled, the town was renamed Little Rock, and the territorial capitol was moved from Arkansas Post in the Fall of 1821. The town was officially incorporated as town in 1831, and as a city in 1835. By 1850 Little Rock was home to over 2000 residents and was an important economic, political, and civic hub for the region. The Arkansas River was the main transportation network for the area and Little Rock was an ideal port for a wide swath of central Arkansas. The population of the city would explode from over 3000 in 1860 to over 12,000 in 1870, and to over 38,000 by 1900. Junction Bridge During the early settlement decades of the town of Little Rock, the only way to cross the Arkansas River was by ferry. Travelers and traders would arrive along the Arkansas River and would use the steamboats that plied the Arkansas River to transport their supplies and goods. The first steamboat to travel up the Arkansas River to Little Rock was the Eagle, which arrived on March 16, 1822. Those wishing to cross the river would need to use the various ferryboats to transport themselves and any cargo. By the 1870s, various railroad lines across Arkansas allowed for faster and easier transportation, but all cargo and passengers still had to be ferried across the river at Little Rock. In 1873, The Baring Cross Bridge railroad bridge was started by the Cairo and Fulton Railroad. This wooden truss railroad bridge opened in late 1873. In 1877, a wooden highway deck was added above the tracks and operated as a toll bridge for the transport of people, wagons, and animals. The success of this elevated highway bridge soon prompted a local ferryman to build a pontoon bridge, also operated by toll, at the river level in competition. By the mid-1880s, the Baring Cross Bridge was in shambles due to deterioration. The Union Bridge Company of New York state was hired to rebuild it with steel camelback trusses, a new lower highway deck alongside the tracks, and new electric lights. It was reopened in January of 1886. This new bridge eventually fell victim to the flood of 1927 despite the railroad’s attempt to safeguard the bridge by trying to ballast it with fully loaded coal cars. It was rebuilt after the flood and still operates, with some 1970s modifications, as the main railroad bridge across the Arkansas River today. As the Baring Cross Bridge was under constant use in the early 1880s, it became clear that another bridge was needed across the Arkansas River at Little Rock. During the early 1880s, The Little Rock, Mississippi River & Texas Railroad partnered with the Little Rock & Fort Smith Railroad to complete a line of track stretching from the Gulf Coast to Indian Territory, now the state of Oklahoma. A new bridge at Little Rock was needed to achieve this goal. In 1883 the Little Rock Junction Railway and Bridge Company was formed. The first load of timber for the construction project arrived at the little rock on the Arkansas River on March 3, 1884. After the timber arrived, the construction workers shared a bottle of wine to toast the new bridge project. The newly formed bridge company hired Major Sickles, a consulting engineer, to oversee construction of the bridge and soon preparations were made to start to build the piers in the Arkansas River. By April, construction workers started assembling the caissons, large water- tight chambers, that would be used to build the bridge’s piers at intervals across the river. The first, two hundred-ton caisson was sunk into and under the river all the way to bedrock. The water inside the chamber was then pumped out and the muddy river bottom was dredged using a large system of pressurized air pumps. This process was witnessed firsthand by an unidentified reporter for the Arkansas Gazette who reported on the construction in an article published on June 28th, 1884. The reporter visited the bridge company office, near the construction site, where he was provided with a full set of rubber overclothes, including long boots, pants, coat, and a rubber hat. The reporter was then taken by flatboat to the caisson where he saw the water and mud being pumped from the riverbed. The reporter was led on to the top of the iron caisson, a worker soon emerged from a hatch and the reporter descended into the dark confines of the metal cylinder in the middle of the river. After climbing down into a small compartment that was then pressurized, the reporter witnessed the system that allowed for water and mud to be pumped from the bottom of the river. The reporter then followed the workers into the larger chamber of the caisson all the way to the bottom of what had been excavated, at a depth of 58 feet below the surface of the river. They ended up standing almost six stories from the surface, and over 20 feet below the surrounding riverbed, as they excavated toward bedrock. The men inside worked by candlelight to push mud toward pipes that would pull it out of the bottom of the caisson. After the reporter’s journey to below the bottom of the river, the reporter returned to the surface and returned his rubber suit, likening it to a journey to the bottom of the sea. Once the workers reached bedrock at the bottom of each of the caissons, they began filling the negative space they had created with concrete, creating the structural piers for the bridge’s superstructure. Interestingly, in newspaper reports of the time, it was noted that during construction of the bridge piers at least 3 “Arkansas toothpicks” or large knives had been found on the riverbed. During the construction of the upper superstructure of the bridge, there were two major accidents that caused injuries among the workers. In September of 1884, a boiler exploded at the construction site, injuring several workers. Also, in November of the same year several workers were injured while working assembling parts of the superstructure with a battering ram. Vibrations from the process of pounding in assembly bolts caused a supporting plank to fall, which was supporting a team of workers, who fell onto a derrick.
Recommended publications
  • Notropis Girardi) and Peppered Chub (Macrhybopsis Tetranema)
    Arkansas River Shiner and Peppered Chub SSA, October 2018 Species Status Assessment Report for the Arkansas River Shiner (Notropis girardi) and Peppered Chub (Macrhybopsis tetranema) Arkansas River shiner (bottom left) and peppered chub (top right - two fish) (Photo credit U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) Arkansas River Shiner and Peppered Chub SSA, October 2018 Version 1.0a October 2018 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 2 Albuquerque, NM This document was prepared by Angela Anders, Jennifer Smith-Castro, Peter Burck (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) – Southwest Regional Office) Robert Allen, Debra Bills, Omar Bocanegra, Sean Edwards, Valerie Morgan (USFWS –Arlington, Texas Field Office), Ken Collins, Patricia Echo-Hawk, Daniel Fenner, Jonathan Fisher, Laurence Levesque, Jonna Polk (USFWS – Oklahoma Field Office), Stephen Davenport (USFWS – New Mexico Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office), Mark Horner, Susan Millsap (USFWS – New Mexico Field Office), Jonathan JaKa (USFWS – Headquarters), Jason Luginbill, and Vernon Tabor (Kansas Field Office). Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2018. Species status assessment report for the Arkansas River shiner (Notropis girardi) and peppered chub (Macrhybopsis tetranema), version 1.0, with appendices. October 2018. Albuquerque, NM. 172 pp. Arkansas River Shiner and Peppered Chub SSA, October 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES.1 INTRODUCTION (CHAPTER 1) The Arkansas River shiner (Notropis girardi) and peppered chub (Macrhybopsis tetranema) are restricted primarily to the contiguous river segments of the South Canadian River basin spanning eastern New Mexico downstream to eastern Oklahoma (although the peppered chub is less widespread). Both species have experienced substantial declines in distribution and abundance due to habitat destruction and modification from stream dewatering or depletion from diversion of surface water and groundwater pumping, construction of impoundments, and water quality degradation.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Arkansas River – Derby to Ark City
    LOWER ARKANSAS BASIN TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD Waterbody/Assessment Unit (AU): Lower Arkansas River – Derby to Ark City Water Quality Impairment: Chloride 1. INTRODUCTION AND PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION Subbasin: Ark River (Derby), Ark River (Oxford), Ark River (Ark City), South Fork Ninnescah River, Ninnescah River, Slate Creek, Unmonitored Basin County: Cowley, Sumner, Sedgwick, Kingman, Pratt, Kiowa HUC 8: 11030013, 11030015, 11030016, 11060001 HUC 11 (HUC 14s): 11030013020(050) 11030013030(010, 030, 040, 050, 060, 070, 080, 090) 11030015010(010, 020, 030, 040, 050, 060, 070, 080, 090) 11030015030(010, 020, 030, 040, 050, 060) 11030016010(010, 020, 030, 040, 050) 11030016020(010, 020, 030) 11060001040(010) Ecoregion: Central Great Plains, Wellington-McPherson Lowland (27d) Flint Hills (28) Drainage Area: 1,653 square miles Main Stem Segments: 11030013 (AU Station 528): Slate Cr (17) (AU Station 281): Arkansas R (3-part) (AU Station 527): Arkansas R (2-part, 3-part, 18) (AU Station 218): Arkansas R (1, 2-part) 11030015 (AU Station 036): S.F. Ninnescah R (1,3,4,6) 11030016 (AU Station 280): Ninnescah R (1,3,8) 11060001 (AU Station 218): Arkansas R (14, 18) 1 Main Stem Segments with Tributaries by HUC 8 and Watershed/Station Number: Table 1 (a-f) a. HUC8 11030013 Watershed Slate Creek Station 528 Slate Cr (17) (partial) Winser Cr (32) Antelope Cr (25) Beaver Cr (29)* Hargis Cr (24)* Oak Cr (26)* Spring Cr (27)* * Not impaired b. HUC8 11030013 Watershed Arkansas River (Derby) Station 281 Arkansas R (3 - part) Spring Cr (37) c. HUC8 11030013 Watershed Arkansas River (Oxford) Station 527 Arkansas R (2 -part) Spring Cr (34) Lost Cr (23) Arkansas R (18) Arkansas R (3 - part) Bitter Cr (28) Dog Cr (531) d.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arkansas River Flood of June 3-5, 1921
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ALBERT B. FALL, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE 0ns SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 4$7 THE ARKANSAS RIVER FLOOD OF JUNE 3-5, 1921 BY ROBERT FOLLANS^EE AND EDWARD E. JON^S WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1922 i> CONTENTS. .Page. Introduction________________ ___ 5 Acknowledgments ___ __________ 6 Summary of flood losses-__________ _ 6 Progress of flood crest through Arkansas Valley _____________ 8 Topography of Arkansas basin_______________ _________ 9 Cause of flood______________1___________ ______ 11 Principal areas of intense rainfall____ ___ _ 15 Effect of reservoirs on the flood__________________________ 16 Flood flows_______________________________________ 19 Method of determination________________ ______ _ 19 The flood between Canon City and Pueblo_________________ 23 The flood at Pueblo________________________________ 23 General features_____________________________ 23 Arrival of tributary flood crests _______________ 25 Maximum discharge__________________________ 26 Total discharge_____________________________ 27 The flood below Pueblo_____________________________ 30 General features _________ _______________ 30 Tributary streams_____________________________ 31 Fountain Creek____________________________ 31 St. Charles River___________________________ 33 Chico Creek_______________________________ 34 Previous floods i____________________________________ 35 Flood of Indian legend_____________________________ 35 Floods of authentic record__________________________ 36 Maximum discharges
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas River Shiner Management Plan for the Canadian River 2 from U
    FINAL - Submitted for Approval Arkansas River Shiner (Notropis girardi) Management Plan for the Canadian River From U. S. Highway 54 at Logan, New Mexico to Lake Meredith, Texas © Konrad Schmidt Canadian River Municipal Water Authority June 2005 Arkansas River Shiner Management Plan for the Canadian River 2 from U. S. Highway 54 at Logan, New Mexico to Lake Meredith Arkansas River Shiner (Notropis girardi) Management Plan for the Canadian River from U. S. Highway 54 at Logan, New Mexico to Lake Meredith, Texas This management plan is a cooperative effort between various local, state, and federal entities. Funding for this plan was provided by the Canadian River Municipal Water Authority. Suggested citation: Canadian River Municipal Water Authority – 2005 – Arkansas River Shiner (Notropis girardi) Management Plan for the Canadian River from U. S. Highway 54 at Logan, New Mexico to Lake Meredith, Texas Preparation of this Plan was accomplished by John C. Williams, acting as Special Advisor under contract to CRMWA. Technical review was provided by Rod Goodwin, Wildlife Biologist and Head of the Water Quality Division of CRMWA. Editorial review was performed by Jolinda Brumley. Cover photograph: Arkansas River Shiner by Ken Collins, USFWS Arkansas River Shiner Management Plan for the Canadian River 3 from U. S. Highway 54 at Logan, New Mexico to Lake Meredith Table of Contents Introduction and Background …………………………………………………………7 Species Biology ...................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Kennedy Assassination Newspaper Collection : a Finding Aid
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Special Collections and University Archives Finding Aids and Research Guides for Finding Aids: All Items Manuscript and Special Collections 5-1-1994 Kennedy Assassination Newspaper Collection : A Finding Aid Nelson Poynter Memorial Library. Special Collections and University Archives. James Anthony Schnur Hugh W. Cunningham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/scua_finding_aid_all Part of the Archival Science Commons Scholar Commons Citation Nelson Poynter Memorial Library. Special Collections and University Archives.; Schnur, James Anthony; and Cunningham, Hugh W., "Kennedy Assassination Newspaper Collection : A Finding Aid" (1994). Special Collections and University Archives Finding Aids: All Items. 19. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/scua_finding_aid_all/19 This Other is brought to you for free and open access by the Finding Aids and Research Guides for Manuscript and Special Collections at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Special Collections and University Archives Finding Aids: All Items by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Kennedy Assassination Newspaper Collection A Finding Aid by Jim Schnur May 1994 Special Collections Nelson Poynter Memorial Library University of South Florida St. Petersburg 1. Introduction and Provenance In December 1993, Dr. Hugh W. Cunningham, a former professor of journalism at the University of Florida, donated two distinct newspaper collections to the Special Collections room of the USF St. Petersburg library. The bulk of the newspapers document events following the November 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy. A second component of the newspapers examine the reaction to Richard M. Nixon's resignation in August 1974.
    [Show full text]
  • Fluvial Sediment in the Little Arkansas River Basin Kansas
    Fluvial Sediment in the Little Arkansas River Basin Kansas GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1798-B Prepared in cooperation with the City of fflichita and the Kansas Water Resources Board Fluvial Sediment in the Little Arkansas River Basin Kansas By C. D. ALBERT and G. J. STRAMEL SEDIMENTATION IN SMALL DRAINAGE BASINS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1798-B Prepared in cooperation with the City of ff^ichita and the Kansas ff^ater Resources Board UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1966 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 60 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract__._____________ ___________.__________________________ Bl Introduction._____________________________________________________ 1 Description of the basin.___________________________________________ 2 Geology. __________________________________________ 3 Geomorphology _ ______________________________________________ 4 Soils. ______________________________-_-_-__---___ 5 Land use and vegetation.______________________________________ 7 Climate._____________________________________________________ 7 Runoff ___________________________________________________ 8 Fluvial sediment._________________________________________________ 13 Field investigations and methods._______________________________ 13 Laboratory methods.__________________________________________ 14 Suspended sediment.__________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Arkansas Riverbed from 1830 to 2011
    History of the Arkansas Riverbed from 1830 to 2012 1830--Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek between the U.S. and the Choctaw Nation, Sept. 27, 1830, 7 Stat. 333-334. 1835--Treaty of New Echota between the U.S. and the Cherokee Nation December 29, 1835, 7 Stat. 478 1837--Treaty between the U.S. and the Chickasaw Nation of January 17, 1837, 11 Stat. 573; Treaty of June 22, 1855, 11 Stat. 611. 1893--Act of Congress of March 3, 1893, 27 Stat. 645, The Dawes commission was created to negotiate with the Indian tribes that had been located in Oklahoma on the allotment of land to their individual members in preparation for the final dissolution of the tribes. 1898--General Land Office had completed a survey of all the lands of the Five Civilized Tribes. 1906--Congress provided for the disposition of all Five Civilized Tribes lands with the provision that any remaining tribal property 'be held in trust by the United States for the use and benefit of the Indians.' Act of April 26, 1906, 27, 34 Stat. 148. The Cherokee, Choctaw and Chickasaw claim title to the bed of the Arkansas River by treaty and patent from the United States. Because the land was not individually allotted or otherwise disposed of pursuant to the 1906 Act, title remained in petitioners or passed to the United States to be held in trust for them. 1907—Oklahoma become a state , Oklahoma claimed ownership and for many years the Nations were without resources to pursue their rights. The State of Oklahoma claims to the river was directed to the―equal footing doctrine, and that it was no exception to the rule that newly admitted states acquired legal title to all navigable water within their borders.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix File 1984 Continuous Monitoring Study (1984.S)
    appcontm.txt Version 01 Codebook ------------------- CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE 1984 CONTINUOUS MONITORING STUDY (1984.S) USER NOTE: This file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As as result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. >> CONTINUOUS MONITORING NEWSPAPER CODE STATE CODE NAME OF PAPER CITY WA 001. ABERDEEN WORLD ABERDEEN TX 002. ABILENE REPORTER-NEWS ABILENE OH 003. AKRON BEACON JOURNAL AKRON OR 004. ALBANY DEMOCRAT-HERALD ALBANY NY 005. ALBANY KNICKERBOCKER NEWS ALBANY NY 006. ALBANY TIMES-UNION, ALBANY NE 007. ALLIANCE TIMES-HERALD, THE ALLIANCE PA 008. ALTOONA MIRROR ALTOONA CA 009. ANAHEIM BULLETIN ANAHEIM MI 010. ANN ARBOR NEWS ANN ARBOR WI 011. APPLETON-NEENAH-MENASHA POST-CRESCENT APPLETON IL 012. ARLINGTON HEIGHTS HERALD ARLINGTON KS 013. ATCHISON GLOBE ATCHISON GA 014. ATLANTA CONSTITUTION ATLANTA GA 015. ATLANTA JOURNAL ATLANTA GA 016. AUGUSTA CHRONICLE AUGUSTA GA 017. AUGUSTA HERALD AUGUSTA ME 018. AUGUSTA-KENNEBEC JOURNAL AUGUSTA IL 019. AURORA BEACON NEWS AURORA TX 020. AUSTIN AMERICAN AUSTIN TX 021. AUSTIN CITIZEN AUSTIN TX 022. AUSTIN STATESMAN AUSTIN MI 023. BAD AXE HURON TRIBUNE BAD AXE CA 024. BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIAN BAKERSFIELD MD 025. BALTIMORE NEWS AMERICAN BALTIMORE MD 026. BALTIMORE SUN BALTIMORE ME 027. BANGOR DAILY NEWS BANGOR OK 028. BARTLESVILLE EXAMINER-ENTERPRISE BARTLESVILLE AR 029. BATESVILLE GUARD BATESVILLE LA 030. BATON ROUGE ADVOCATE BATON ROUGE LA 031. BATON ROUGE STATES TIMES BATON ROUGE MI 032. BAY CITY TIMES BAY CITY NE 033. BEATRICE SUN BEATRICE TX 034. BEAUMONT ENTERPRISE BEAUMONT TX 035. BEAUMONT JOURNAL BEAUMONT PA 036.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian River Basin Bioassessment
    Canadian River Basin Bioassessment Sarah Robertson, Melissa Parker, Gordon Linam, Clinton Robertson, Archis Grubh Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Inland Fisheries Division AND Melissa Casarez University of Texas at Austin, Biodiversity Collections River Studies Report No. 26 Inland Fisheries Division Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas October 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 2 Study Area ................................................................................................................. 2 Survey and Management History .............................................................................. 2 Study Sites .............................................................................................................................. 4 Canadian River .......................................................................................................... 6 Oxbow Lakes ............................................................................................................. 6 Supplemental Fish Collection Sites ........................................................................... 7 Water Quality and Quantity .................................................................................................... 8 Fish Assemblage ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • George Chaplin: W. Sprague Holden: Newbold Noyes: Howard 1(. Smith
    Ieman• orts June 1971 George Chaplin: Jefferson and The Press W. Sprague Holden: The Big Ones of Australian Journalism Newbold Noyes: Ethics-What ASNE Is All About Howard 1(. Smith: The Challenge of Reporting a Changing World NEW CLASS OF NIEMAN FELLOWS APPOINTED NiemanReports VOL. XXV, No. 2 Louis M. Lyons, Editor Emeritus June 1971 -Dwight E. Sargent, Editor- -Tenney K. Lehman, Executive Editor- Editorial Board of the Society of Nieman Fellows Jack Bass Sylvan Meyer Roy M. Fisher Ray Jenkins The Charlotte Observer Miami News University of Missouri Alabama Journal George E. Amick, Jr. Robert Lasch Robert B. Frazier John Strohmeyer Trenton Times St. Louis Post-Dispatch Eugene Register-Guard Bethlehem Globe-Times William J. Woestendiek Robert Giles John J. Zakarian E. J. Paxton, Jr. Colorado Springs Sun Knight Newspapers Boston Herald Traveler Paducah Sun-Democrat Eduardo D. Lachica Smith Hempstone, Jr. Rebecca Gross Harry T. Montgomery The Philippines Herald Washington Star Lock Haven Express Associated Press James N. Standard George Chaplin Alan Barth David Kraslow The Daily Oklahoman Honolulu Advertiser Washington Post Los Angeles Times Published quarterly by the Society of Nieman Fellows from 48 Trowbridge Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02138. Subscription $5 a year. Third class postage paid at Boston, Mass. "Liberty will have died a little" By Archibald Cox "Liberty will have died a little," said Harvard Law allowed to speak at Harvard-Fidel Castro, the late Mal­ School Prof. Archibald Cox, in pleading from the stage colm X, George Wallace, William Kunstler, and others. of Sanders Theater, Mar. 26, that radical students and Last year, in this very building, speeches were made for ex-students of Harvard permit a teach-in sponsored by physical obstruction of University activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Water in the Lower Arkansas River Valley, Arkansas
    Ground Water in the Lower Arkansas River Valley, Arkansas GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1669-V Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army, Corps of Engineers Ground Water in the Lower Arkansas River Valley, Arkansas By M. S. BEDINGER and H. G. JEFFERY CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE HYDROLOGY OF THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1669-V Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army, Corps of Engineers UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract____.______________________________.__ VI Introduction_________ ____________________________________ 1 Well-numbering system.________________________________________ _ 3 Geology. ____________________________ ____ ______ ___ 3 Quaternary System____________________________________________ 4 Terrace deposits_________________________________ ___ 4 Alluvium.______________________________________________ 5 Ground-water hydrology _________________________________________ 6 Water table____________________________________ 6 Fluctuations._____________________________________________ 6 Superposed-__-___-____---__-__--___------_---_-__---_ 6 Basic._______________________________________________ 7 Configuration_______ _____________________________________ 9 Recharge.____________________________________________________ 11 Discharge. ______________________________
    [Show full text]
  • WATERWAY FACT SHEET Mcclellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System
    WATERWAY FACT SHEET McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System HISTORICAL INFORMATION BRIDGES Highway bridges across the main waterway are fixed The McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System high level spans. Railroad bridges across the main waterway are (“MKARNS”) is the official name of the waterway. In 1946, lift spans from the mouth through Fort Smith, Ark., and fixed the Rivers and Harbors Act authorized the building of the multi- high level spans from Fort Smith to Catoosa, Okla. The railroad purpose system. Beneficiaries include: navigation, recreation, and highway bridges across the navigable portion of San Bois hydropower, water supply, wildlife conservation, and flood Creek are fixed spans. The 2-percent flow line for each bridge control (when considered as a part of the Arkansas River Basin is the elevation of flows exceeded less than 2-percent of the Project and its upstream reservoirs that control water flows). time. The MKARNS is crossed by 29 highway bridges and 10 Construction of the upstream reservoirs in Oklahoma railroad spans. began in 1950. Construction of the navigation system started with Dardanelle Lock and Dam # 10 @ Russellville, Ark., in GAGES 1957. Clearance gages: All bridges have clearance gages Completed in 1970 at a cost of $1.2 billion, the system installed on the pier protection cells or the navigation span pier is 445-miles long (137 miles in Oklahoma & 308 miles in located on the right side of the channel. The gages indicate the Arkansas) and has 17 locks and dams — 5 in Oklahoma and 12 vertical clearance available under the bridge. th in Arkansas.
    [Show full text]