DOCSLIB.ORG

San Diego Regional PLUG-IN ELECTRIC VEHICLE (PEV) READINESS PLAN

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
San Diego Regional PLUG-IN ELECTRIC VEHICLE (PEV) READINESS PLAN San Diego Regional PLUG-IN ELECTRIC VEHICLE (PEV) READINESS PLAN Preparing the San Diego Region for Plug-in Electric Vehicles January 2014 Acknowledgements Many individuals aided in the preparation of the San Diego Regional Plug-In Electric Vehicle (PEV) Readiness Plan and related products. Of particular note is the sustained involvement of the San Diego Regional Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (REVI) Working Group. San Diego REVI Voting Members Susan Freedman, Chair & Allison King, SANDAG Gretchen Crowson & Ramsey Helson, City of Del Mar Mike Ferry, Vice Chair, California Center for Sustainable Energy Michelle White & Jenny Lybeck, Brendan Reed, City of Chula Vista Unified Port District of San Diego Chris Helmer, City of Imperial Beach Paul Manasjan & Brett Caldwell, Mike Grim, City of Carlsbad San Diego Regional Airport Authority Kathy Winn, City of Escondido Joel Pointon & Randy Shimka, San Diego Gas & Electric Kathy Valverde, City of Santee Greg Newhouse, Miramar College, Advanced Transportation Scott Munzenmaier, City of La Mesa Technology & Energy Center Jacques Chirazi, City of San Diego Karen Prescott & Tim Dudek, National Electrical Contractors Peter Livingston, County of San Diego Association (NECA) Chris Schmidt, Caltrans - District 11 Micah Mitrosky, International Brotherhood of Electrical Randy Walsh, San Diego Electric Vehicle Network Workers (IBEW) Local 569 Dave Weil, University of California, San Diego San Diego REVI Advisory Members Mike Watt & Nick Cormier, San Diego Air Pollution Dan King, City of Solana Beach Control District Lyn Dedmon, City of Vista Chris Parry, US Navy, Department of Defense Andy Hoskinson, Ecotality Claire Spielberg, Metropolitan Transit System Mike Cully, Car2go Bill Cecil, City of Coronado Charlie Botsford, Aerovironment Diane Langager, City of Encinitas Colleen Quinn, ChargePoint (Coulomb) Ray Pe, City of National City David Wang, General Electric Additional Acknowledgements The work undertaken through this contract also benefitted from concurrent regional and state PEV efforts, in particular the Zero-Emission Vehicles Community Readiness Guidebook Working Group led by the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR). SANDAG acknowledges the California Center for Sustainable Energy for its partnership role on this contract. The following staff of SANDAG and the CCSE had primary responsibility for the preparation of the work products created under this contract. SANDAG California Center for Sustainable Energy Anna Lowe Mike Ferry Susan Freedman Tyler Petersen Allison King Wood David Almeida Jessica Jinn This document was prepared as a result of work sponsored by the California Energy Commission. It does not necessarily represent the views of the Energy Commission, its employees or the State of California. The Commission, the State of California, its employees, contractors and subcontractors make no warranty, expressed or implied, and assume no legal liability for the information in this document; nor does any party represent that the use of this information will not infringe upon privately owned rights. Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Why Develop This Plan? .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Legislation .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 SANDAG ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Regional adoption .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 3. The San Diego Regional Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (REVI) Working Group and Stakeholders ......................................... 7 3.1 Background and Purpose....................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Organization and Stakeholder Engagement ................................................................................................................................................. 7 3.3 Regional Barriers to PEV Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................................................ 8 4. PEVs and Public Charging Infrastructure in the San Diego Region .....................................................................................................10 5. The Basics of Plug-in Electric Vehicles and Charging Infrastructure .....................................................................................................12 5.1 Vehicle Types ............................................................................................................................................................................................................12 5.2 Charging Infrastructure ........................................................................................................................................................................................13 Types of charging equipment .............................................................................................................................................................................14 Finding public charging infrastructure ...........................................................................................................................................................15 Access to public charging infrastructure ........................................................................................................................................................15 Locations of public charging stations in the San Diego region ..............................................................................................................15 6. Regional Plug-in Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Existing Conditions .................................................................................................18 6.1 Local Governments ................................................................................................................................................................................................18 6.2 Single Family Residences .....................................................................................................................................................................................18 6.3 Multi-Unit Dwellings ..............................................................................................................................................................................................18 6.4 Workplace, Retail and Public Locations ..........................................................................................................................................................19 7. Regional Barriers to EVSE Deployment and Key Recommendations .................................................................................................20 7.1 Regional Planning for Public EVSE Siting .......................................................................................................................................................20 Overview ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................20 Classifying local land use statistics for PEVs .................................................................................................................................................22 Land use/parking analysis for EVSE ..................................................................................................................................................................22 PEVs in local government fleets .........................................................................................................................................................................23 Public electric vehicle charging stations .........................................................................................................................................................24 Education and outreach ........................................................................................................................................................................................24 7.2 Permitting for EVSE ................................................................................................................................................................................................24
Load more

Recommended publications
  • POSITION STATEMENT: UNFAIR TAXES for ELECTRIC VEHICLES This Position Is Supported by the Following Drive Electric Minnesota Policy Committee Members
    POSITION STATEMENT: UNFAIR TAXES FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES This position is supported by the following Drive Electric Minnesota Policy Committee members: Alliance for Transportation Electrification Minnesota Electric Vehicle Owners American Lung Association in Minnesota Minnesota Power City of Minneapolis Otter Tail Power Company Connexus Energy Plug In America Elk River Municipal Utilities Shift2Electric Fresh Energy Xcel Energy Great River Energy Electric vehicle (EV) users should pay their fair share for the use of Minnesota roads, but they should not pay MORE than owners of equivalent conventional vehicles or than their fair share. Upkeep for Minnesota’s roads relies significantly on the Highway Users Tax Distribution Fund, which is funded through a combination of fuel tax revenue (including gasoline tax and $75 EV tax), license fees (including registration taxes), and motor vehicle sales taxes. Auto parts sales taxes and other sources also provide funding.1 Why is Drive Electric Minnesota concerned about unfair new taxes on EVs? • EVs already pay more than their fair share. EV drivers currently pay a $75 annual tax in lieu of a gas tax in addition to paying more in motor vehicle sales tax and registration tax than someone buying a comparable gasoline vehicle. In total highway taxes, EV owners already pay more over the life of the vehicle than the average gas vehicle driver, as shown in figure 1. • Inconsistent with the user-pays principle: The current gas tax model assesses a fee on a driver based on their vehicle’s fuel economy (miles per gallon) and how much they drive. Drivers of vehicles with low fuel economy (few miles per gallon) need to fuel their tank more, as do drivers that drive a lot.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Energy Use Reduction Plan
    Lake Country Transit Energy Use Reduction Plan Energy Use Reduction, Capital Expenditure, Funding and Management/Training Plan December 2015 Prepared by ICF International 620 Folsom St, Suite 200 San Francisco, CA 94107 415.677.7100 Lake Country Transit Energy Use Reduction Plan Table of Contents Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 1 Energy Use Reduction Plan ............................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Facility ......................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.1 Review of Existing Facility and Operations .................................................................................6 1.2.2 Facility, Operations and Maintenance Strategies .......................................................................7 1.3 Vehicle Fleet and Alternative Fuels .......................................................................................... 16 1.3.1 Review of Fleet Operations ...................................................................................................... 16 1.3.2 Alternative Fuel Options .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • One Million Electric Vehicles by 2015
    One Million Electric Vehicles By 2015 February 2011 Status Report 1 Executive Summary President Obama’s goal of putting one million electric vehicles on the road by 2015 represents a key milestone toward dramatically reducing dependence on oil and ensuring that America leads in the growing electric vehicle manufacturing industry. Although the goal is ambitious, key steps already taken and further steps proposed indicate the goal is achievable. Indeed, leading vehicle manufacturers already have plans for cumulative U.S. production capacity of more than 1.2 million electric vehicles by 2015, according to public announcements and news reports. While it appears that the goal is within reach in terms of production capacity, initial costs and lack of familiarity with the technology could be barriers. For that reason, President Obama has proposed steps to accelerate America’s leadership in electric vehicle deployment, including improvements to existing consumer tax credits, programs to help cities prepare for growing demand for electric vehicles and strong support for research and development. Introduction In his 2011 State of the Union address, President Obama called for putting one million electric vehicles on the road by 2015 – affirming and highlighting a goal aimed at building U.S. leadership in technologies that reduce our dependence on oil.1 Electric vehicles (“EVs”) – a term that includes plug-in hybrids, extended range electric vehicles and all- electric vehicles -- represent a key pathway for reducing petroleum dependence, enhancing environmental stewardship and promoting transportation sustainability, while creating high quality jobs and economic growth. To achieve these benefits and reach the goal, President Obama has proposed a new effort that supports advanced technology vehicle adoption through improvements to tax credits in current law, investments in R&D and competitive “With more research and incentives, programs to encourage communities to invest we can break our dependence on oil in infrastructure supporting these vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Port of San Diego
    Port of San Diego The Port of San Diego manages San Diego Bay and its 34 miles of beautiful, natural waterfront for the people of California. The Port was established in 1962 under the Port Act and is charged with implementing the Tidelands Trust Doctrine. For over fifty years, the Port’s five-member cities - Chula Vista, Coronado, Imperial Beach, National City and San Diego - have worked together to develop and promote LEGENDPort of commerce, navigation, recreation and fisheries on and BNSFSan Diego UP/SP Trackage Rights Handling Carrier LEGEND around San Diego Bay. Self-funded, the port contributes Haulage Agreement BNSF billions annually to San Diego’s economy, benefiting the UP/SP Trackage Rights Handling Carrier community, local businesses and employees. The port’s Haulage Agreement cargo maritime business includes two cargo terminals. TERMINAL CAPABILITIES • Harbor: One (San Diego Bay) • Berths: 15 • Cranes: 1 mobile harbor crane • Depth: 30 ft. - 43 ft. • Facilities: Two marine cargo terminals • Rail-Served: On-dock terminal rail • Cargo Handled: Breakbulk Project Cargo Refrigerated Ro-Ro (Roll-on/Roll-off) Alex Williamson Brian Johnston Connie Le Fevre Greg Borossay Sales Manager Sales Manager Sr Trade Representative Maritime Commercial BNSF Railway BNSF Railway Port of San Diego Port of San Diego [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Office: 612-380-8852 Office: 817-304-6425 619-756-1949 619-686-6242 Port of San Diego TERMINAL CAPABILITIES OVERVIEW TENTH AVENUE MARINE TERMINAL • Depth: 30 ft. – 43 ft. • Berth(s): Eight, equaling 4,347 ft. • Cargo Handling Capabilities: • Port owned - 100 Ton Gottwald Crane • Stevedore owned and operated - Reach stackers, rail pusher (leased), utility trucks, fork lifts and heavy lifts • Rail-Served: On-dock rail adjacent to BNSF yard • Main yard: Seven spurs, equaling 9000 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Plug-In Electric Vehicle Showcases: Consumer Experience and Acceptance
    Plug-In Electric Vehicle Showcases: Consumer Experience and Acceptance Mark Singer National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-5400-75707 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC July 2020 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Plug-In Electric Vehicle Showcases: Consumer Experience and Acceptance Mark Singer National Renewable Energy Laboratory Suggested Citation Singer, Mark. 2020. Plug-In Electric Vehicle Showcases: Consumer Experience and Acceptance. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/TP-5400-75707. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/75707.pdf NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-5400-75707 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC July 2020 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy National Renewable Energy Laboratory Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov NOTICE This work was authored by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. Funding provided by U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Vehicle Technologies Office. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the DOE or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • March 19, 2012 by SDPTA Chair Jim Unger
    March 19, 2012 By SDPTA C hair Jim Unger Overview– Jim Unger Overview– Jim Unger Port of San Diego Facts: Port includes Five Member Cities: Chula Vista, Coronado, Imperial Beach, National City, San Diego Board of 7 Port Commissioners: Chairman Lou Smith, Coronado Commissioner Vice Chair Ann Moore, Chula Vista Commissioner Secretary Lee Burdick, San Diego Commissioner Commissioner Dan Malcolm, Imperial Beach Commissioner Bob Nelson, San Diego Commissioner Dukie Valderrama, National City Commissioner Scott Peters, San Diego Overview The San Diego Unified Port District a nd Tidelands businesses contributes 30% of Gross Regional Product 77,000 Jobs Partnership with the Port and its tenants Overview The Port is self-sustaining from revenues collected from the Port Tenants with NO TAX DOLLARS FROM CITIZENS Overview Partnership with the Port of San Diego – Participation on the Following Port/Tenant Committees: Maritime, Marketing, Real Estate, Cruise Ship, Public Art, Environmental, Accessibility, Port with no Borders Scholarship & Tidelands Forestry. Downsizing of Port - new President/CEO Wayne Darbeau 13 departments down to 6 & decreased employee headcount by 100 without lay-offs. Background California Statelands Commission Public Trust Policy (2 excerpts below t aken from Public Trust Policy) Lands are owned by t he public and held in trust for the people by t he State of California. Uses of trust lands are generally l imited to those that are water dependent or related, and include commerce, fisheries, and navigation, environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Registered Motorised Vehicles
    Submission No 6 NON-REGISTERED MOTORISED VEHICLES Name: Mr Mark Walker Date Received: 10/03/2013 Mr Greg Aplin MP Chair Joint Standing Committee on Road Safety NSW Parliament 10/03/2013 Re: Inquiry into Non‐registered motorised vehicles Dear Sir Upon becoming aware of the Committee’s Inquiry via an advertisement calling for submissions in the SMH (9‐ 10 Mar 2013), I resolved to make the Committee aware of my concerns in this regard. As I understand it from current road and vehicle regulations: ‐ Mobility scooters are not allowed to travel on public roads, are limited to 10km/h and 110kg unladen mass, but otherwise are not regulated ‐ Electrically‐assisted pedal‐powered bicycles (ADR category AB) are limited to 200W motors, but are otherwise unregulated ‐ ICE‐assisted* pedal‐powered bicycles are limited to 50cc capacity, must comply with certain noise limits, but are otherwise unregulated ‐ Segways are currently banned ‐ Mopeds (being motorised pedal‐assist cycles) must be registered as for ‘motorcycles’ whether electric or ICE‐powered ‐ Quad bikes, pitbikes and other similar small‐capacity motorised vehicles (like buggys) are restricted to ‘offroad recreational vehicle’ licensing for use in designated areas (such as Stockton Beach) but are otherwise unable to be registered or driven on roads and in public areas due to non‐compliance with ADRs. * ICE – Internal Combustion Engine As the Committee’s focus in its terms of reference is ‘usage’ and ‘impact on road safety’ perhaps the latter needs to be clarified, especially in regard to those vehicles specifically designed and only ‘allowed’ to be used ‘off‐road’.
    [Show full text]
  • San Diego Unified Port District San Diego, CA 92101
    Page 1 of 215 3165 Pacific Hwy. San Diego Unified Port District San Diego, CA 92101 Special Meeting Minutes Board of Port Commissioners Wednesday,January16,2019 9:30 AM Don L. Nay Port Administration Boardroom Closed Session A. Roll Call. Present: 7 - Commissioner Bonelli, Chairperson Castellanos, Commissioner Malcolm, Commissioner Merrifield, Commissioner Moore, Commissioner Valderrama, and Commissioner Zucchet Excused: 0 Absent: 0 Commissioner Moore was excused until she arrived at 9:36 am. Officers Present: Coniglio, DeAngelis, Monson, Morales, and Russell B. Public Communications. The following member(s) of the public addressed the Board with non agenda-related comments: None CLOSED SESSION Thomas A. Russell, General Counsel, announced the Closed Session items as follows: 1. Closed Session Item No. 1 PERSONNEL EVALUATION: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT/CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Government Code Section 54957 No reportable action was taken on this item. San Diego Unified Port District Page 1 Page 2 of 215 Board of Port Commissioners Special Meeting Minutes January 16, 2019 2. 2019-0020 Closed Session Item No. 2 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: SDUPD - Chula Vista Bayfront parcel consisting of approximately 74.7 acres of land at H Street and Marina Parkway, Chula Vista Negotiating Parties: RIDA Chula Vista, LLC,- Ira Mitzner and Luke Charlton; City of Chula Vista - Gary Halbert; SDUPD - Shaun Sumner, Tony Gordon, Adam Meyer, Stephanie Shook and Sean Jones. Under Negotiations: Price and Terms
    [Show full text]
  • Written Remarks
    Plug In America 6380 Wilshire Blvd Suite 1000 Los Angeles, CA 90048 323-372-1236 June 19, 2020 Nevada Legislative Committee on Energy 401 S. Carson Street Carson City, NV 89701-4747 Submitted via email to Assemblywoman Daniele Monroe-Moreno ([email protected]); Senator Chris Brooks ([email protected]); and Marjorie Paslov-Thomas ([email protected]) Re: SCR 3 Transportation Funding Solutions Dear Chair Monroe-Moreno and Vice-Chair Brooks: On behalf of the electric vehicle (EV) drivers in Nevada that we represent, Plug In America would like to thank you for your leadership with the Senate Concurrent Resolution 3 (SCR3) process, particularly given these challenging times. EVs provide significant benefits to all Nevadans, and we urge you to take these benefits into account as you finalize the report on alternative solutions for transportation funding in Nevada, including what fees – if any – should be assessed to EV drivers in Nevada. Plug In America is the nation’s leading independent consumer voice for accelerating the use of EVs in the United States to consumers, policymakers, auto manufacturers and others. Formed as a non-profit in 2008, Plug In America provides practical, objective information collected from our coalition of plug-in vehicle drivers through public outreach and education, policy work and a range of technical advisory services. Our expertise represents the world’s deepest pool of experience of driving and living with plug­ in vehicles.1 The solutions to solving the immediate transportation funding shortfalls in Nevada – and also nationwide – require major shifts in how the funding has historically been implemented.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Drive by '25
    ELECTRIC DRIVE BY ‘25: How California Can Catalyze Mass Adoption of Electric Vehicles by 2025 September 2012 About this Report This policy paper is the tenth in a series of reports on how climate change will create opportunities for specific sectors of the business community and how policy-makers can facilitate those opportunities. Each paper results from one-day workshop discussions that include representatives from key business, academic, and policy sectors of the targeted industries. The workshops and resulting policy papers are sponsored by Bank of America and produced by a partnership of the UCLA School of Law’s Environmental Law Center & Emmett Center on Climate Change and the Environment and UC Berkeley School of Law’s Center for Law, Energy & the Environment. Authorship The author of this policy paper is Ethan N. Elkind, Bank of America Climate Policy Associate for UCLA School of Law’s Environmental Law Center & Emmett Center on Climate Change and the Environment and UC Berkeley School of Law’s Center for Law, Energy & the Environment (CLEE). Additional contributions to the report were made by Sean Hecht and Cara Horowitz of the UCLA School of Law and Steven Weissman of the UC Berkeley School of Law. Acknowledgments The author and organizers are grateful to Bank of America for its generous sponsorship of the workshop series and input into the formulation of both the workshops and the policy paper. We would specifically like to thank Anne Finucane, Global Chief Strategy and Marketing Officer, and Chair of the Bank of America Environmental Council, for her commitment to this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 32 VEHICLE RECALLS by MANUFACTURER, 2000 Report Prepared 1/16/2008
    Page 1 of 32 VEHICLE RECALLS BY MANUFACTURER, 2000 Report Prepared 1/16/2008 MANUFACTURER RECALLS VEHICLES ACCUBUIL T, INC 1 8 AM GENERAL CORPORATION 1 980 AMERICAN EAGLE MOTORCYCLE CO 1 14 AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO 8 212,212 AMERICAN SUNDIRO MOTORCYCLE 1 2,183 AMERICAN SUZUKI MOTOR CORP. 4 25,023 AMERICAN TRANSPORTATION CORP. 5 1,441 APRILIA USA INC. 2 409 ASTON MARTIN 2 666 ATHEY PRODUCTS CORP. 3 304 B. FOSTER & COMPANY, INC. 1 422 BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE 11 28,738 BLUE BIRD BODY COMPANY 12 62,692 BUELL MOTORCYCLE CO 4 12,230 CABOT COACH BUILDERS, INC. 1 818 CARPENTER INDUSTRIES, INC. 2 6,838 CLASSIC LIMOUSINE 1 492 CLASSIC MANUFACTURING, INC. 1 8 COACHMEN INDUSTRIES, INC. 8 5,271 COACHMEN RV COMPANY 1 576 COLLINS BUS CORPORATION 1 286 COUNTRY COACH INC 6 519 CRANE CARRIER COMPANY 1 138 DABRYAN COACH BUILDERS 1 723 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION 30 6,700,752 DAMON CORPORATION 3 824 DAVINCI COACHWORKS, INC 1 144 D'ELEGANT CONVERSIONS, INC. 1 34 DORSEY TRAILERS, INC. 1 210 DUTCHMEN MANUFACTURING, INC 1 105 ELDORADO NATIONAL 1 173 ELECTRIC TRANSIT, INC. 1 54 ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY 1 40 E-ONE, INC. 1 3 EUROPA INTERNATIONAL, INC. 2 242 EXECUTIVE COACH BUILDERS 1 702 FEATHERLITE LUXURY COACHES 1 83 FEATHERLITE, INC. 2 3,235 FEDERAL COACH, LLC 1 230 FERRARI NORTH AMERICA 8 1,601 FLEETWOOD ENT., INC. 5 12, 119 FORD MOTOR COMPANY 60 7,485,466 FOREST RIVER, INC. 1 115 FORETRAVEL, INC. 3 478 FOURWINNS 2 2,276 FREIGHTLINER CORPORATION 27 233,032 FREIGHTLINER LLC 1 803 GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
    [Show full text]
  • And Medium-Duty Eligible Vehicle List
    Public Benefit Grants Program New Alternative Fuel Vehicle Purchase Component Light- and Medium-Duty Eligible Vehicle List Program staff will review and update this list periodically to reflect the release of eligible new light- and medium-duty vehicles. Applicants may contact program staff at (559) 230-5800 or [email protected] to inquire about specific vehicles not listed or other vehicle types such as transport/utility carts, scooters, bicycles, etc. Year Vehicle Make Vehicle Model Technology Emission Standard Category 2014 Honda Accord Plug-In Hybrid PHEV AT PZEV Sedan VOLT with Low Emissions Package (Low 2013 Chevrolet Emissions Package will have an E, F, G or H in the PHEV AT PZEV Sedan 5th position of the VIN) 2013 Toyota PRIUS PLUG-IN HYBRID PHEV AT PZEV Sedan 2013 Ford CMAX Energi PHEV AT PZEV Sedan 2013 Ford Focus Electric BEV ZEV Sedan 2013 Ford Fusion Energi PHEV AT PZEV Sedan 2013 Honda FIT EV BEV ZEV Coupe 2013 Smart Electric Fortwo (Coupe and Cabrio) BEV ZEV Coupe 2013 Coda CODA BEV ZEV Sedan 2013 Nissan Leaf BEV ZEV Sedan 2013 Club Car CARRYALL 2 LSV BEV NEV NEV 2013 Club Car CARRYALL 6 LSV BEV NEV NEV 2013 Club Car VILLAGER 2 BEV NEV NEV 2013 Club Car VILLAGER 2+2 BEV NEV NEV 2013 Columbia Paccar SM2 (Battery Type: Pb-A or Li+) BEV NEV NEV 2013 Columbia Paccar SM4 (Battery Type: Pb-A or Li+) BEV NEV NEV 2013 Columbia Paccar SUV-SN (Battery Type: Pb-A or Li+) BEV NEV NEV 2013 Columbia Paccar SUV-LN (Battery Type: Pb-A or Li+) BEV NEV NEV Page 1 of 9 rev.
    [Show full text]