DOCSLIB.ORG

The Underground of the Western Alps

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Mémoires de Géologie (Lausanne) No. 15, 1993 - I - The Underground of the Western Alps by Robin Marchant IMPRIMERIE CHABLOZ S.A., TOLOCHENAZ ISSN 1015-3578 - II - This eloctronic version is identical to the printed edition, except for some figures which are in color here but in black and white in the printed edition. - I - Université de Lausanne Institut de Géologie Faculté des Sciences et de Paléontologie The Underground of the Western Alps Thèse de doctorat présentée à la Faculté des Sciences de l’Université de Lausanne par Robin Marchant géologue diplômé Jury de thèse: Prof. Gérard Stampfli (Directeur) Prof. Raymond Olivier (Lausanne) Dr. Riccardo Polino (Torino) Prof. Albrecht Steck (Lausanne) Prof. François Thouvenot (Grenoble) Mémoires de Géologie (Lausanne) No. 15, 1993 - II - Cover image (after a photo from the book "CERVIN, une montagne de PUB"; by courtesy of Yvan Hostet- tler): The Matterhorn, the most outstanding mountain of the Western Alps, has puzzled many generations of geologists, of which Emile Argand (see drawing above) was one of the most eminent. This peak is made of gneisses (the series of Arolla and Valpelline) originating in the Austroalpine terrain; they overlie the Piemont accretionary prism (the “Schistes Lustrés” of the Tsaté nappe) and remnants of the Piemont oceanic crust (the ophiolites of Zermatt-Saas). A few km down in the Matter valley, a large backfold affects the Siviez-Mischabel nappe (corresponding to Argand’s “Série de Casanna”), which originates in the Briançonnais exotic terrain. In order to puzzle out the deep structures in this region, the PNR/NFP-20 research programme shot two deep seismic lines at the foot of the Matterhorn: the W3 line runs up the Matter valley, passing through the village of Zermatt, up to Zmutt, where it is relayed by a short perpendicular profile, the W4 line. - III - Table of contents Abstract .................................................................... VI 5.1 General remarks .............................................. 19 5.1.1 Introduction ............................................ 19 Résumé ...................................................................... VI 5.1.2 Previous studies ...................................... 19 5.1.3 Geological setting ................................... 19 PART I - GENERAL REMARKS 5.1.3.1 Introduction .................................... 19 5.1.3.2 Deformation history ....................... 22 1. Introduction ............................................................. 1 5.1.3.3 Description of the main structural 1.1 The present study .............................................. 1 units ............................................... 22 1.2 The PNR/NFP-20 research programme ............ 1 5.1.4 Acquisition and processing .................... 24 1.3 The Ecors and Crop alpine research 5.2 Modelling and interpretation of the W2 programmes ...................................................... 1 profile ............................................................. 24 1.4 The Western Alps: nomenclature ..................... 3 5.2.1 The Vibroseis seismic sections .............. 24 5.2.2 Preliminary interpretation ...................... 27 2. Methodology ........................................................... 5 5.2.3 The “Initial” model ................................ 27 2.1 The modelling concept ..................................... 5 5.2.4 Velocity modelling ................................. 30 2.2 Surface geology data ........................................ 5 5.2.5 The “Final” model .................................. 33 2.3 Seismic tools ..................................................... 6 5.2.6 Interpretation of the W2 line .................. 36 2.4 Geodynamics .................................................... 7 5.3 Interpretation of the W3 profile ...................... 37 5.3.1 Introduction ............................................ 37 3. Computer programs ............................................... 7 5.3.2 Interpretation .......................................... 37 3.1 Introduction ....................................................... 7 5.4 Interpretation of the W4 profile ...................... 41 3.2 Reflection seismic processing programs ........... 7 5.4.1 Introduction ............................................ 41 3.2.1 GEOVECTEUR (CGG™) .................................... 7 5.4.2 Interpretation .......................................... 41 3.2.2 CHARISMA (GECO™) ................................ 7 5.5 The 3-D structural geometry ........................... 44 3.2.3 CIGOGNE ................................................... 10 5.6 A synthetic section of the Penninic nappes .... 56 3.2.3.1 Description ..................................... 10 5.6.1 Construction of the section .................... 47 3.2.3.2 An example with the PNR/NFP- 5.6.2 Nappe correlation ................................... 49 20 W4 line ..................................... 10 5.6.3 Backfolding of the External Crystalline 3.2.3.1 General remarks on migration ........ 12 massifs ................................................... 49 3.3 Seismic and gravity modelling programs ........ 13 5.7 Discussion ...................................................... 50 3.3.1 SIERRA ...................................................... 13 3.3.2 DEUDIM .................................................... 14 6. Modelling and interpretation along the 3.3.3 2MOD (LCT™).......................................... 14 southern half of the E1 profile ............................ 52 6.1 Introduction .................................................... 52 4. Physical properties of rocks from the Western 6.1.1 Previous studies ..................................... 52 Alps........................................................................ 15 6.1.2 Geological setting .................................. 52 4.1 Introduction ..................................................... 15 6.1.3 Acquisition and processing .................... 54 4.2 Densities and P-wave velocities of Western 6.1.4 Preliminary interpretations .................... 55 Alps rocks ............................................................ 15 6.2 3-D seismic models ......................................... 55 4.3 Specific density and velocity problems .......... 16 6.2.1 Introduction ............................................ 55 4.3.1 Mylonitization ........................................ 16 6.2.2 The “Initial” model ................................ 55 4.3.2 Marmorization ........................................ 17 6.2.3 The “South” model ................................ 60 4.3.3 Granulitization/eclogitization ................. 17 6.2.4 The “Final” model ................................. 61 4.3.4 Serpentinization ...................................... 18 6.3 2-D models ..................................................... 64 6.3.1 The front of the Tambo nappe ............... 64 6.3.2 The “Chiavenna” 2-D gravity model .... 67 PART II - MODELLING AND INTERPRETATION 6.4 Interpretation of the southern half of the E1 OF THE NAPPE SYSTEM profile ............................................................. 70 6.4.1. The migrated sections ........................... 70 5. Modelling and interpretation along the W2, W3 6.4.2 Interpretation .......................................... 72 and W4 profiles .................................................... 19 6.5 Discussion ...................................................... 73 - IV - PART III - CRUSTAL- AND LITHOSPHERIC- 8. Lithospheric-scale interpretation ........................ 99 SCALE INTERPRETATION 8.1 Introduction .................................................... 99 8.2. The lithosphere-asthenosphere transition ...... 99 7. Crustal-scale interpretation ................................ 74 8.3 The lithospheric cross-sections ..................... 101 7.1 Introduction .................................................... 74 8.4. Gravity modelling ........................................ 104 7.2 The Ecors-Crop Alp traverse ......................... 75 8.4.1 Introduction .......................................... 104 7.2.1 Introduction ............................................ 75 8.4.2 The gravity models ............................... 104 7.2.2 Interpretation .......................................... 76 8.5 Discussion ..................................................... 111 7.3. The PNR/NFP-20 Western traverse .............. 79 7.3.1 Introduction ............................................ 79 9. Palinspastic reconstructions .............................. 113 7.3.2 General concept ..................................... 79 9.1 Introduction .................................................. 113 7.3.3 The W1-W2 profile ............................... 80 9.2. From rifting to passive-margin stage ........... 113 7.3.4 The W3 profile ...................................... 82 9.3 Oceanic-subduction stage ............................. 115 7.3.5 The W4 profile ...................................... 85 9.4 Continental-collision stage ........................... 115 7.3.6 Synthetic section of the Western 9.4.1 Introduction .......................................... 115 traverse .................................................. 88 9.4.2 The Algero-Provençal phase (30 to 7.4 The PNR/NFP-20 Central traverse ................ 88 15 Ma) ................................................. 117 7.4.1 Introduction ........................................... 88 9.4.3 The Tyrrhenian phase (15 to 0 Ma) ..... 122 7.4.2 Interpretation ........................................
Recommended publications
  • The Structure of the Alps: an Overview 1 Institut Fiir Geologie Und Paläontologie, Hellbrunnerstr. 34, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria

    The Structure of the Alps: an Overview 1 Institut Fiir Geologie Und Paläontologie, Hellbrunnerstr. 34, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria

    Carpathian-Balkan Geological pp. 7-24 Salzburg Association, XVI Con ress Wien, 1998 The structure of the Alps: an overview F. Neubauer Genser Handler and W. Kurz \ J. 1, R. 1 2 1 Institut fiir Geologie und Paläontologie, Hellbrunnerstr. 34, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria. 2 Institut fiir Geologie und Paläontologie, Heinrichstr. 26, A-80 10 Graz, Austria Abstract New data on the present structure and the Late Paleozoic to Recent geological evolution ofthe Eastem Alps are reviewed mainly in respect to the distribution of Alpidic, Cretaceous and Tertiary, metamorphic overprints and the corresponding structure. Following these data, the Alps as a whole, and the Eastem Alps in particular, are the result of two independent Alpidic collisional orogens: The Cretaceous orogeny fo rmed the present Austroalpine units sensu lato (including from fo otwall to hangingwall the Austroalpine s. str. unit, the Meliata-Hallstatt units, and the Upper Juvavic units), the Eocene-Oligocene orogeny resulted from continent­ continent collision and overriding of the stable European continental lithosphere by the Austroalpine continental microplate. Consequently, a fundamental difference in present-day structure of the Eastem and Centrai/Westem Alps resulted. Exhumation of metamorphic crust fo rmed during Cretaceous and Tertiary orogenies resulted from several processes including subvertical extrusion due to lithospheric indentation, tectonic unroofing and erosional denudation. Original paleogeographic relationships were destroyed and veiled by late Cretaceous sinistral shear, and Oligocene-Miocene sinistral wrenching within Austroalpine units, and subsequent eastward lateral escape of units exposed within the centrat axis of the Alps along the Periadriatic fault system due to the indentation ofthe rigid Southalpine indenter.
  • Present-Day Uplift of the European Alps Evaluating Mechanisms And

    Present-Day Uplift of the European Alps Evaluating Mechanisms And

    Earth-Science Reviews 190 (2019) 589–604 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth-Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Invited review Present-day uplift of the European Alps: Evaluating mechanisms and models T of their relative contributions ⁎ Pietro Sternaia, ,1, Christian Sueb, Laurent Hussonc, Enrico Serpellonid, Thorsten W. Beckere, Sean D. Willettf, Claudio Faccennag, Andrea Di Giulioh, Giorgio Spadai, Laurent Jolivetj, Pierre Vallac,k, Carole Petitl, Jean-Mathieu Nocquetm, Andrea Walpersdorfc, Sébastien Castelltorta a Département de Sciences de la Terre, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland b Chrono-Environnement, CNRS, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Besançon, France c Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, IFSTAR, ISTERRE, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Grenoble 38000, France d Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Centro Nazionale Terremoti, Bologna, Italy e Institute for Geophysics, Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA f Erdwissenschaften, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich (ETH), Zurich, Switzerland g Dipartimento di Scienze, Università di Roma III, Rome, Italy h Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra e dell'Ambiente, Università di Pavia, Pavia, Italy i Università degli Studi di Urbino “Carlo Bo”, Urbino, Italy j Sorbonne Université, Paris, France k Institute of Geological Sciences, Oeschger Center for Climate Research, University of Bern, Switzerland l Geoazur, IRD, Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis, Valbonne, France m Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Paris, France ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Recent measurements of surface vertical displacements of the European Alps show a correlation between vertical European Alps velocities and topographic features, with widespread uplift at rates of up to ~2–2.5 mm/a in the North-Western Vertical displacement rate and Central Alps, and ~1 mm/a across a continuous region from the Eastern to the South-Western Alps.
  • The Tectonic and Rheological Evolution of An

    The Tectonic and Rheological Evolution of An

    The tectonic and rheological evolution of an attenuated cross section of the continental crust: Ivrea crustal section, southern Alps, northwestern Italy and southern Switzerland M. R. HANDY Geologisches Institut, Universität Bern, Baltzerstrasse 1, 3012 Bern, Switzerland A. ZINGG Geologisches Institut, Universität Basel Bernoullistrasse 32, 4056 Basel Switzerland ABSTRACT The tectonic and rheological evolution of the southern Alpine The Ivrea crustal cross section in northwestern Italy and southern continental crust is reconstructed from structural, petrological, and Switzerland (Fig. 1) is an excellent area to test geophysical models of the radiometric studies in the Ivrea and Strona-Ceneri basement units. continental crust. The section actually consists of two basement units, the The deep crust of the southern Alps acquired its present compositional Ivrea zone and the Strona-Ceneri zone, which represent thinned lower to and metamorphic zonation during Paleozoic magmatism and amphib- intermediate continental crust of the southern Alps (reviews in Zingg, olite-to granulite-facies regional metamorphism. Inferred strength con- 1983; Boriani and Origoni Giobbi, 1984; Zingg and others, 1990). The trasts between lower crustal and upper mantle rocks in the Ivrea zone Permian-Mesozoic sedimentary cover of the Strona-Ceneri zone crops out are low at the high temperatures of regional metamorphism. Late to the south of the basement section (Fig. 1). The history of the Ivrea and Paleozoic transtension and basic to intermediate magmatism in all Strona-Ceneri zones is loosely subdivided into three tectonometamorphic crustal levels preceded extensional faulting associated with the forma- episodes (Fig. 2). Large-scale magmatism and regional metamorphism tion of a passive continental margin during early Mesozoic time.
  • THE NORDEND of MONTE ROSA. T. Graham Brown

    THE NORDEND of MONTE ROSA. T. Graham Brown

    THE • VOL. LIII NOVEMBER I 942 NO. 265 THE NORDEND OF MONTE ROSA BY T. GRAHAM BROWN Substance of a lecture delivered before the Alpine Club, December g, 1941. T is curious to reflect that the ascent of the N ordend might have been one of the most popular in the Alps had the Dufourspitze been but 83 ft. lower. As things are, the mountain is relatively neglected. The usual route to its graceful summit lies off the beaten track, and more .often than not the N ordend is omitted during traverses of the Monte Rosa peaks ; parties from the Marinelli hut seem almost invariably to take the easier but more dangerous route to the Dufour­ spitze in preference to the more difficult ascent of the N ordend by its stupendous Macugnaga face ; the sensational Frontier arete, 1 which plunges to the Jagerjoch in vertical steps, has rarely been visited ; and (to the best of my knowledge) the wide and steep Weisstor (or N.E.) face of the N ordend has so far received attention from but a single climbing party. To these striking neglects may be added a fifth: on only one former occasion, and that was nearly thirty years ago, has the Nordend been the subject of a paper read before the Club.2 The event deserves to be recalled, because it was then that E. A. Broome described his expedition of 191 I, when, in the course of the day, he ascended the Macugnaga face from the Marinelli hut and descended by the ordinary route to the Riffelhaus the memorable achievement of a great climber who was in his sixty-seventh year at the time of the ascent.
  • Lithostratigraphy and U-Pb Zircon Dating in the Overturned Limb of the Siviez-Mischabel Nappe: a New Key for Middle Penninic Nappe Geometry

    Lithostratigraphy and U-Pb Zircon Dating in the Overturned Limb of the Siviez-Mischabel Nappe: a New Key for Middle Penninic Nappe Geometry

    1661-8726/08/020431-22 Swiss J. Geosci. 101 (2008) 431–452 DOI 10.1007/s00015-008-1261-5 Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2008 Lithostratigraphy and U-Pb zircon dating in the overturned limb of the Siviez-Mischabel nappe: a new key for Middle Penninic nappe geometry FLORIAN GENIER1, JEAN-LUC EPARD 1, FRANÇOIS BUSSY 2 & TOMAS MAGNA2 Key words: alps, Middle Penninic, Siviez-Mischabel nappe, Permo-Carboniferous, Randa orthogneiss, zircon typology, U-Pb geochronology ABSTRACT Detailed field work and zircon analysis have improved the knowledge of the This coherent overturned sequence can be observed from the St-Niklaus area to lithostratigraphy at the base of the Siviez-Mischabel nappe in the Mattertal the Moosalp pass to the north. Detailed mapping revealed that the St-Niklaus (St-Niklaus-Törbel area). They confirm the existence of an overturned limb syncline is symmetrical and connects the overturned limb of the Siviez-Mischa- and clarify the structure of the St-Niklaus syncline. The following formations bel nappe to the normal series of the Upper Stalden zone. U-Pb zircon geo- can be observed: chronology on magmatic and detrital zircons allowed constraining ages of these formations. Detrital zircons display ages ranging from 2900 ± 50 to 520 ± 4 Ma • Polymetamorphic gneisses; composed of paragneisses, amphibolites and in the Törbel Formation, and from 514 ± 6 to 292 ± 9 Ma in the Moosalp Forma- micaschists (Bielen Unit, pre-Ordovician). tion. In addition, the Permian Randa orthogneiss is intrusive into the polymeta- • Fine-grained, greyish quartzite and graywacke with kerogen-rich hori- morphic gneisses and into the Permo-Carboniferous metasediments of the zons (Törbel Formation, presumed Carboniferous).
  • A New Challenge for Spatial Planning: Light Pollution in Switzerland

    A New Challenge for Spatial Planning: Light Pollution in Switzerland

    A New Challenge for Spatial Planning: Light Pollution in Switzerland Dr. Liliana Schönberger Contents Abstract .............................................................................................................................. 3 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Light pollution ............................................................................................................. 4 1.1.1 The origins of artificial light ................................................................................ 4 1.1.2 Can light be “pollution”? ...................................................................................... 4 1.1.3 Impacts of light pollution on nature and human health .................................... 6 1.1.4 The efforts to minimize light pollution ............................................................... 7 1.2 Hypotheses .................................................................................................................. 8 2 Methods ................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Literature review ......................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Spatial analyses ........................................................................................................ 10 3 Results ....................................................................................................................11
  • Tours À Ski St-Luc - Bella Tola - Borterpass - Massstafel - Senntum – Cab

    Tours À Ski St-Luc - Bella Tola - Borterpass - Massstafel - Senntum – Cab

    Tours à ski St-Luc - Bella Tola - Borterpass - Massstafel - Senntum – Cab. de Tourtemagne (Chemin normal en hiver) Depuis St-Luc, prendre les remonte-pentes jusqu’à la Bella Tola à 3'000 m. De là suivre les pistes de ski et quitter ces dernières avant que celles-ci ne reconduisent en plaine par le Pas de Bœuf. De là, à peaux de phoque, traverser jusqu’au Borterpass 2'838 m (20 min). Redescendre ensuite par le Meidtälli jusqu’à environ 2'400 m puis traverser vers l’Augstolu jusqu’au premier marquage à 2'360 m (coord. 619'100/117'700). Depuis ce point, suivre les autres marquages jusqu’à Massstafel. Depuis Massstafel suivre la route forestière jusqu’à Haarnadelkurve à 2'041 m. Suivre encore 300 m la route puis tourner à droite dans la forêt et rejoindre Senntum. Suivre ensuite la route qui monte jusqu’au barrage, contourner le lac et le traverser pour rejoindre un peu plus loin le petit monte-charge. Suivre la moraine contre le sud puis monter à la cabane de Tourtemagne. Compter 4 heures depuis la Bella Tola. St-Luc - Gämsschwart - Gälushaupt - Massstafel - Senntum – Cabane de Tourtemagne (5-6h) Depuis l’hôtel Weisshorn ou la cabane Bella Tola monter par le lac de Cambevert au Gämsschwart à 2'794 m. Traverser en légère pente le col à l’est du Gälus Häupt. Depuis le col redescendre par l’Äugsttälli à Massstafel. Depuis Massstafel suivre la route forestière jusqu’à Haarnadelkurve à 2'041 m. Suivre encore 300 m la route puis tourner à droite dans la forêt et rejoindre Senntum.
  • Alpine Exploratory Walker's Haute Route

    Alpine Exploratory Walker's Haute Route

    Holiday Notes 2019 Walker’s Haute Route (Self-Guided) Please email us at [email protected] to chat about this holiday. You’ll find all the latest information at www.alpineexploratory.com/holidays/walkers-haute-route.html. Our approach is the entry to Switzerland, home for the rest of the trek. The climb is one of the easier ones on the Your route route. Auberge in Trient Our trip gives a complete journey on foot from Chamonix to Zermatt. No transport is needed and on Stage 3: Trient to Champex arriving in Zermatt’s town centre you’ll have (14km with 1380m ascent) completed the entire Haute Route under your own One of the most challenging passes comes on steam. Standardly our trip has 14 stages. The Haute today’s stage: the Fenêtre d’Arpette (2,665m). There Route is a loosely defined trail where map and are higher passes to come, but few as rocky and compass skills are needed to supplement any steep. Descend for a night in the quiet resort of waymarks on the ground. There are no ‘Haute Champex with its pretty lake. Hotel in Champex Route’ waymarks to follow. Where the trail splits we follow routes via Fenêtre d’Arpette, Col de la Chaux, Stage 4: Champex to Le Châble Cabane des Dix, Col de Tsate, the Forcletta and the (13km with 260m ascent and 930m descent) Europaweg, but our routecards describe alternative There follows a relaxing day’s walk through quiet routes too. Swiss countryside to Le Châble. Drop to Early Summer snow patches Sembrancher in the valley then walk steadily up to Routecards and maps Le Châble.
  • Kinematics and Extent of the Piemont-Liguria Basin

    Kinematics and Extent of the Piemont-Liguria Basin

    https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2020-161 Preprint. Discussion started: 8 October 2020 c Author(s) 2020. CC BY 4.0 License. Kinematics and extent of the Piemont-Liguria Basin – implications for subduction processes in the Alps Eline Le Breton1, Sascha Brune2,3, Kamil Ustaszewski4, Sabin Zahirovic5, Maria Seton5, R. Dietmar Müller5 5 1Department of Earth Sciences, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany 2Geodynamic Modelling Section, German Research Centre for Geosciences, GFZ Potsdam, Germany 3Institute of Geosciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany 4Institute for Geological Sciences, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Germany 10 5EarthByte Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia Correspondence to: Eline Le Breton ([email protected]) Abstract. Assessing the size of a former ocean, of which only remnants are found in mountain belts, is challenging but crucial to understand subduction and exhumation processes. Here we present new constraints on the opening and width of the Piemont- Liguria (PL) Ocean, known as the Alpine Tethys together with the Valais Basin. We use a regional tectonic reconstruction of 15 the Western Mediterranean-Alpine area, implemented into a global plate motion model with lithospheric deformation, and 2D thermo-mechanical modelling of the rifting phase to test our kinematic reconstructions for geodynamic consistency. Our model fits well with independent datasets (i.e. ages of syn-rift sediments, rift-related fault activity and mafic rocks) and shows that the PL Basin opened in four stages: (1) Rifting of the proximal continental margin in Early Jurassic (200-180 Ma), (2) Hyper- extension of the distal margin in Early-Middle Jurassic (180-165 Ma), (3) Ocean-Continent Transition (OCT) formation with 20 mantle exhumation and MORB-type magmatism in Middle-Late Jurassic (165-154 Ma), (4) Break-up and “mature” oceanic spreading mostly in Late Jurassic (154-145 Ma).
  • Hiking the Haute Route

    Hiking the Haute Route

    Hiking the Haute Route 11 Days Hiking the Haute Route Experience the Haute Route or "High Road" of the Alps on this challenging itinerary designed for serious trekkers. The Haute Route connects Mont Blanc to the Matterhorn on one of the most spectacular hikes in all the Alps, showcasing majestic mountain passes, alpine pastures, glorious glaciers, storybook hamlets, and delightful alpine huts. Embrace the thrill of summiting ten passes in ten days, guided by top professional guides, and enjoy the comfort of warm hospitality at night in a string of charming alpine towns and villages. Details Testimonials Arrive: Geneva, Switzerland "Around every turn, over every pass they view continuously moves from Depart: Geneva or Zermatt, Switzerlandincredible to never to be forgotten. It really made me think of the amazing Duration: 11 Days power of nature." Jeffrey S. Group Size: 4-16 Guests Minimum Age: 18 Years Old "The sense of accomplishment that came with this trip was matched by the Activity Level: Level 4 vistas, the trails, and the scope of the . experience." Owen W. REASON #01 REASON #02 REASON #03 No one knows the Alps like Professional MT Sobek guides Custom-designed for MT MT Sobek, with four decades are the best in the Alps, all well Sobek, our Haute Route trek of experience leading trips reputed for their indispensable combines strenuous all-day here and a regular following knowledge and skillsets. treks, with carefully chosen, of Alps-loving clients. comfortable lodgings in gorgeous alpine settings. ACTIVITIES LODGING CLIMATE High-altitude hikes, challenging Charming, first-class The days can change from hot summits that involve steep trails, accommodations in alpine to cold and wet.
  • Alps the Role of the Periadriatic Line in the Tectonic Evolution of The

    Alps the Role of the Periadriatic Line in the Tectonic Evolution of The

    Geological Society, London, Special Publications The role of the Periadriatic Line in the tectonic evolution of the Alps S. M. Schmid, H. R. Aebli, F. Heller and A. Zingg Geological Society, London, Special Publications 1989; v. 45; p. 153-171 doi:10.1144/GSL.SP.1989.045.01.08 Email alerting click here to receive free email alerts when new articles cite this service article Permission click here to seek permission to re-use all or part of this article request Subscribe click here to subscribe to Geological Society, London, Special Publications or the Lyell Collection Notes Downloaded by on 30 May 2007 © 1989 Geological Society of London The role of the Periadriatic Line in the tectonic evolution of the Alps S. M. Schmid, H. R. Aebli, F. Heller & A. Zingg SUMMARY: The Periadriatic Line and related lineaments formed as a result of post- collisional deformations which severely modified the Alpine chain. This post-late Oligocene deformation is the result of dextral transpression between the Adriatic sub-plate and the European foreland. Indentation of the western edge of the southern Alps caused uplift, related to backthrusting and associated deformations of the Lepontine region combined with E-directed escape of the central Alps. In the eastern Alps the response to dextral transpression is mainly by lateral escape along conjugate strike slip zones with minor or no vertical movements. Older deformations along this essentially late Alpine lineament can still be inferred locally and include: extension and transfer faulting in the late Palaeozoic to early Mesozoic, Cretaceous deformations, and Tertiary phases of compression (Eocene) and possibly extension (Oligocene).
  • The Deep Structure of the Engadine Window : Evidence from Deep Seismic Data

    The Deep Structure of the Engadine Window : Evidence from Deep Seismic Data

    The deep structure of the Engadine window : evidence from deep seismic data Autor(en): Hitz, Luzi Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae Band (Jahr): 89 (1996) Heft 2 PDF erstellt am: 06.10.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-167919 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch http://www.e-periodica.ch Eclogae geol. Helv. 89/2: 657-675 (1996) 0012-9402/96/020657-19 $1.50 + 0.20/0 Birkhäuser Verlag. Basel The deep structure of the Engadine Window: Evidence from deep seismic data Luzi Hitz1 Key words: Seismic reflection, deep structure. Engadine Window ABSTRACT A deep seismic reflection profile through the Engadine Window provides a first detailed image ofthe Window's deep crustal structure.