DOCSLIB.ORG

White Pine Blister Rust in Western North America J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
White Pine Blister Rust in Western North America J Yale University EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies School of Forestry and Environmental Studies Bulletin Series 1943 White Pine Blister Rust in Western North America J. L. Mielke United States Department of Agriculture Follow this and additional works at: https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/yale_fes_bulletin Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons, and the Forest Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Mielke, J. L., "White Pine Blister Rust in Western North America" (1943). Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies Bulletin Series. 56. https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/yale_fes_bulletin/56 This Newsletter is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Forestry and Environmental Studies at EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale. It has been accepted for inclusion in Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies Bulletin Series by an authorized administrator of EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale. For more information, please contact [email protected]. YALE UNIVERSITY· SCHOOL OF FORESTRY Bulletin No. 52 WHITE PINE BLISTER RUST IN WESTERN NORTH AMERICA BY J. L. MIELKE, B.S.F., .M.S., PH.D. Associate Pathologist, Division of Forest Pathology, Bureau ofPlant Industry, Soils, and Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural Research.Administration, United States Department ofAgriculture NEW HAVEN y ale University 1943 A Note to Readers 2012 This volume is part of a Bulletin Series inaugurated by the Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies in 1912. The Series contains important original scholarly and applied work by the School’s faculty, graduate students, alumni, and distinguished collaborators, and covers a broad range of topics. Bulletins 1-97 were published as bound print-only documents between 1912 and 1994. Starting with Bulletin 98 in 1995, the School began publishing volumes digitally and expanded them into a Publication Series that includes working papers, books, and reports as well as Bulletins. To celebrate the centennial of publishing at the school, the long out-of-print Bulletins 1-97 were scanned to make them available as pdfs to a broader audience. A caution: the scanning process is not perfect, especially for print documents as old as some of these, so the readers’ indulgence is requested for some of the anomalies that remain despite our best efforts to clean them up. Eve rything published from 1912-present is available on the School’s websit e (http://environment.yale.edu/publications ) for free download. Nothing in the Series requires copyright permission for reproduction when intended for personal or classroom use. Bound copies of everything published in the Series from 1912 to the present are also available in the Yale University libraries and archives and can best be accessed by contacting the School of Forestry & Environmental Studies librarian. The publication of the results of this investigation was made possible by the Charles Lathrop Pack Foundation at Yale University. The original manuscript was submitted as a dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor ofPhilosophy in Yale University. CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 ORIGIN OF WHITE PINE BLISTER RUST 2 INTRODUCTION TO NORTH AMERICA 3 Eastern North America 3 Western North America 3 WHITE PINES OF WESTERN NORm AMERICA 5 THE RUST ON PINES 8 Relative Susceptibility of Western White Pines 8 Development of the Rust on Pines 9 Mode of infection 9 Incubation period IO Pycnial production 12 Aecial production 13 Canker Elongation 18 Determination of the Year of Infection on Pines 21 Rate of Intensification and Damage 22 Some Factors Affecting the Infection of Pines 26 Time of pine infection 26 Germination of the teliospores and sporidia 26 Time required for pine infection 31 Rain in relation to pine infection 33 Fog in relation to pine infection 35 Dew in relation to pine infection 36 Receptivity and susceptibility 38 Vigor of the host 39 Resistant individuals within a species 39 Size of tree in relation to infection 40 Relative virulence and abundance of sporidia from different ribes species 41 Heavy ribes infection and premature leaf cast 41 Influence of foliage screens on pine infection 42 Effective Distance of Dissemination of the Sporidia 43 THE RUST ON RIBES 46 Ribes in the West and Their Susceptibility 46 Development of the Rust on Ribes 50 Parts of the plant attacked and mode of infection 50 Incubation period on ribes 51 The uredial stage 53 The telial stage 56 WHITE PINE BLISTER RUST Page Some Factors Influencing Infection of Ribes 58 Infection resulting from aeciospores 58 Infection resulting from urediospores 62 Some Effects of Aeciospore Source on Ribes Infection 65 Effect on Ribes of Annually Repeated Heavy Infection 66 Time of Telial Development on Some Western Ribes 67 SCOUTING FOR THE RUST 71 EARLY HISTORY OF BLISTER RUST IN THE WEST 72 SPREAD OF THE RUST BY YEARS 75 Spread from 1910 to 1913, Inclusive 75 Spread from 1914 to 1921, Inclusive 77 Spread in 1922 83 Spread in 1923 84 Spread from 1924 to 1926, Inclusive 88 Spread in 1927 93 Spread in 1928 97 Spread from 1929 to 1935, Inclusive 98 Spread in 1936 102 Spread in 1937 103 Spread in 1938 105 Spread from 1939 to 1942, Inclusive 108 GENERAL ASPECT OF SPREAD 110 DISSEMINATING AGENCIES AND SPORE STAGES INVOLVED 114 POSSIBLE LIMITS OF LONG-DISTANCE SPREAD 116 RELATION OF WEATHER TO SPREAD AND INTENSIFICATION OF THE RUST 119 WAVELIKE CHARACTER OF SPREAD 9F THE RUST 127 RATE AND DIRECTION OF SPREAD OF THE RUST 130 SOME RELATIONS OF RIBES SPECIES IN THE SPREAD OF THE RUST 137 PINON RUST: ITS COMPLICATION IN THE SPREAD OF BLISTER RUST 139 SOME BIOLOGICAL FACTORS UNFAVORABLE TO DEVELOP. MENT OF THE RUST 141 STRAINS OF WHITE PINE BLISTER RUST 142 SUMMARY 142 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I¢ REFERENCES CITED 147 ILLUSTRATIONS Figures Page 1. Range limits of western white pine (Pinus montieola) and sugar pine (P.lambertiana). 2. Known pine infection centers regarded as having become established in 1913. 3. Known pine infection centers regarded as having become established in 1917 or 1918 shown as triangles, and centers ofprevious origin as circles. 81 4. Known pine infection centers regarded as having become established in 1920 and 1921 shown as triangles, and centers of previous origin as circles. 82 5. Known distribution of Cronartium ribieola on ribes in the West in 1922 shown by dots. Shaded area is the composite range limits ofwhite pines in the West. 6. Known distribution ofCronartium ribieola on ribes in 1923. Crosshatching represents general infection of this host. Dots are infections at outlying points. Shaded area is composite range limits ofwhite pines in the West. 7. Known pine infection centers regarded as having become established in 1923 shown as triangles, and centers of previous origin as circles. Hatching is area of general pine infection. 89 8. Known distribution of Cronartium ribieola on ribes in 1925. Crosshatched areas are regions where the rust was general on these hosts. Dots are places where infected bushes were found outside these areas. Shaded area is composite range limits of white pines in the West. 9. Known distribution of Cronartium ribieola on ribes in 1927. Hatched areas are regions where the rust was general in occurrence on these hosts. Dots are places where infected bushes were found outside these areas. Shaded portion is composite range limits of white pines. 95 10. The distribution of Cronartium ribieola on pines in 1927-28. Hatched areas are regions ofgeneral pine infection. Advance centers outside are designated as follows: circles are known pine infection centers that became established in 1923 and previously; squares are known centers regarded as originating in 1925 or 1926; triangles are all known places where pine infection became established in 1927 or 1928. Those re­ garded as of 1928 origin are relatively few in number, but are included with those of 1927 because the probable year of origin is sometimes difficult to determine. Throughout the West generally very little pine infection occurred in 1928 because of the extreme dryness of the sum­ mer and fall seasons. 96 11. Known distribution of Cronartium ribieola on ribes in 1928. The area over which the rust was known to be general in occurrence on these hosts is designated by crosshatching. Dots are places where infected bushes were found outside this area. Shaded portion is composite range limits of white pines. 100 WHITE PINE BLISTER RUST Figures Page 12. Known distribution of Cronartium ribicola on pines (broken line) and ribes (solid line) in the West to 1936, inclusive. Known spread to ribes in 1937 shown by circles. Shaded portion is composite range limits of white pines. 106 13. Known limits of Cronartium ribicola on pines (broken line) and ribes (solid line) in the West to 1942, inclusive. Shaded portion is composite range limits of white pines. II I 14. A small Pinus monticola infected with Cronartium ribicola. The tree has been tapped gently so as to jar loose the aeciospores. Two clouds of these spores are plainly visible. (Photograph by Bureau ofEntomology and Plant Quarantine, U.S.D.A.) II8 TABLES Page 1. Place of origin of blister rust cankers on Pinus monticola. 35 2. Decrease in amount ofblister rust infection on Ribes lacustre and R. divari- catum with increase in distance from the aeciospore source. 66 3. Precipitation at Vancouver, British Columbia. 75 4. Average monthly precipitation during the growing season in various re- gions of the West. 132 WHITE PINE BLISTER RUST IN WESTERN NORTH AMERICA INTRODUCTION HITE pine blister rust (Cronartium ribicola, Fischer) needs no W introduction to American plant pathologists and foresters. Aided by the developed forms of transportation of man and by his constant urge for new and better forms of plant life, the fungus was enabled to escape from its native Asian home and to establish itself first in Europe and then in America.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PCBR 1956.Pdf (858.1Kb)
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Region One BR REPORTS Annual - 1956 WHITE PINE BLISTER RUST CONTROL Calendar Year 1956 INF. IV. National Park Program I. Highlights of the 1956 Season The 1956 objectives of the National Park Service Region II white pine blister rust control program were accomplished. The program was planned and conducted as in previous years according to the cooperative arrangements between the Na- tional Park Service and the U. S. Forest Service. National Park Service personnel participating: Glacier Elmer Fladniark, chief ranger *A. D. Cannavina, s~pervisory park ranger Paul Webb, district ranger Yellowstone Otto Brown, chief ranger •~H. o. Edwards, assistant chief ranger Rocky Mountain: Harry During, chief ranger ->~Merle Stitt, staff ranger Grand Teton '-'"Ernest K. Field, chief r~ger Maynard Barrows, National Park Service consulting forester U. s .. forest Service· representatives: ~John C. Gynn, forester C. M. Chapman, forester The Na tionai Park Service Director approves new areas for -control. In January 1956, John c. Gynn met with National Park Service Region II Director Howard w. Baker, Regional Forester Frank ff. Childs, Fore:ster Maynard Barrows, and other members of their .s-taff at Omaha, "Nebraska, to review the results of the 1955 white pine and ribes survey on l7,270 acres of National Park lands. The group deter- mined ·the following areas should be incl\Jded in the pro;gram and the areas were later approved by the Director of the National Park Service. ~15- Glacier - expanded protection zones to present control areas only. Unit Acres Park Headquarters 300 East Glacier (Rising Sun Campground) 370 Twd Medicine 200 Total 870 Yellowstone New Unit Antelope Creek 1,390 Canyon 11,470 Fishing Bridge 2,090 Craig Pass (extension) 5,240 Total 20,190 Grand Teton New Unit Snake River (De adman 's Bar) 1,010 Grand Total 22,070 New areas surveyed at Roc~Mounta~~· At the request of Superintendent James V.
    [Show full text]
  • Stuart, Trees & Shrubs
    Excerpted from ©2001 by the Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. May not be copied or reused without express written permission of the publisher. click here to BUY THIS BOOK INTRODUCTION HOW THE BOOK IS ORGANIZED Conifers and broadleaved trees and shrubs are treated separately in this book. Each group has its own set of keys to genera and species, as well as plant descriptions. Plant descriptions are or- ganized alphabetically by genus and then by species. In a few cases, we have included separate subspecies or varieties. Gen- era in which we include more than one species have short generic descriptions and species keys. Detailed species descrip- tions follow the generic descriptions. A species description in- cludes growth habit, distinctive characteristics, habitat, range (including a map), and remarks. Most species descriptions have an illustration showing leaves and either cones, flowers, or fruits. Illustrations were drawn from fresh specimens with the intent of showing diagnostic characteristics. Plant rarity is based on rankings derived from the California Native Plant Society and federal and state lists (Skinner and Pavlik 1994). Two lists are presented in the appendixes. The first is a list of species grouped by distinctive morphological features. The second is a checklist of trees and shrubs indexed alphabetically by family, genus, species, and common name. CLASSIFICATION To classify is a natural human trait. It is our nature to place ob- jects into similar groups and to place those groups into a hier- 1 TABLE 1 CLASSIFICATION HIERARCHY OF A CONIFER AND A BROADLEAVED TREE Taxonomic rank Conifer Broadleaved tree Kingdom Plantae Plantae Division Pinophyta Magnoliophyta Class Pinopsida Magnoliopsida Order Pinales Sapindales Family Pinaceae Aceraceae Genus Abies Acer Species epithet magnifica glabrum Variety shastensis torreyi Common name Shasta red fir mountain maple archy.
    [Show full text]
  • Pines in the Arboretum
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MtJ ARBORETUM REVIEW No. 32-198 PETER C. MOE Pines in the Arboretum Pines are probably the best known of the conifers native to The genus Pinus is divided into hard and soft pines based on the northern hemisphere. They occur naturally from the up­ the hardness of wood, fundamental leaf anatomy, and other lands in the tropics to the limits of tree growth near the Arctic characteristics. The soft or white pines usually have needles in Circle and are widely grown throughout the world for timber clusters of five with one vascular bundle visible in cross sec­ and as ornamentals. In Minnesota we are limited by our cli­ tions. Most hard pines have needles in clusters of two or three mate to the more cold hardy species. This review will be with two vascular bundles visible in cross sections. For the limited to these hardy species, their cultivars, and a few hy­ discussion here, however, this natural division will be ignored brids that are being evaluated at the Arboretum. and an alphabetical listing of species will be used. Where neces­ Pines are readily distinguished from other common conifers sary for clarity, reference will be made to the proper groups by their needle-like leaves borne in clusters of two to five, of particular species. spirally arranged on the stem. Spruce (Picea) and fir (Abies), Of the more than 90 species of pine, the following 31 are or for example, bear single leaves spirally arranged. Larch (Larix) have been grown at the Arboretum. It should be noted that and true cedar (Cedrus) bear their leaves in a dense cluster of many of the following comments and recommendations are indefinite number, whereas juniper (Juniperus) and arborvitae based primarily on observations made at the University of (Thuja) and their related genera usually bear scalelikie or nee­ Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, and plant performance dlelike leaves that are opposite or borne in groups of three.
    [Show full text]
  • SCIENCE Biodiversityand SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY
    SCIENCE BIODIVERSITYand SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY A FINDINGS REPORT OF THE National Commission on Science for Sustainable Forestry A Program Conducted by the National Council for Science and the Environment Improving the scientific basis for environmental decisionmaking NCSE The mission of the National Commission on Science for Sustainable Forestry (NCSSF or Commission) is to improve the NCSSF operates under the scientific basis for developing, implementing, and evaluating sustainable auspices of the National forestry in the United States. Council for Science and The Commission is an independent, non-advocacy, multi-stakeholder the Environment (NCSE), body that plans and oversees the NCSSF program. It includes 16 leading a non-advocacy, not-for-profit scientists and forest management professionals from government, indus- organization dedicated to improving the scientific basis try, academia, and environmental organizations—all respected opinion for environmental decision leaders in diverse fields with broad perspectives. Members serve as making. individuals rather than as official representatives of their organizations. The Commission convenes at least twice a year to plan and oversee NCSE promotes interdiscipli- the program. Members’ names and affiliations are listed on page 2. nary research that connects The primary goal of the NCSSF program is to build a better scientific the life, physical, and social underpinning for assessing and improving sustainable forest management sciences and engineering. practices. The program strives to produce information and tools of the highest technical quality and greatest relevancy to improving forest Communication and outreach policy, management, and practice. are integral components of The initial five-year phase of the program focuses on the relationship these collaborative research between biodiversity and sustainable forest management.
    [Show full text]
  • Pinus Monticola Doulg. Ex D. Don Family: Pinaceae Western White Pine
    Pinus monticola Doulg. Ex D. Don Family: Pinaceae Western White Pine The genus Pinus is composed of about 100 species native to temperate and tropical regions of the world. Wood of pine can be separated microscopically into the white, red and yellow pine groups. The word pinus is the classical Latin name. The word monticola means inhabiting mountains. Other Common Names: Berg-tall, Columbia pijn, finger-cone pine, Idaho white pine, little sugar pine, mountain pine, mountain white pine, Norway white pine, pin argente, pin argente americain, pino bianco americano, pino blanco americano, silver pine, soft pine, vasterns Weymouth-tall, western white pine, Weymouth berg-pijn, Weymouth mountain pine, white pine, yellow pine. Distribution: Western white pine is native to the mountains ffrom northwestern Montana, extreme southwestern Alberta and southern British Columbia, south to Washington, Oregon and California through the Sierra Nevada to western Nevada and central California. The Tree: Western white pine trees reach heights of 180 feet, with a clear bole for 70 to 100 feet and diameters of 3.5 feet. Over mature trees may reach heights of 197 feet, with diameters of almost 6 feet. They may grow for 300 to 400 years. General Wood Characteristics: The sapwood of western white pine is nearly white to pale yellow, while the heartwood is cream to light reddish brown and may turn darker upon exposure. The wood has a slight resinous odor, but no characteristic taste. It is straight grained and has a rather coarse texture. It is also soft, light, is moderately weak in bending, moderately strong in end compression and moderately low in shock resistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Trials at the Waiakea Arboretum, Hilo, Hawaii. Berkeley, Calif., Pacific SW
    Species Trials at the Waiakea Arboretum Hilo, Hawaii George B. Richmond U. S. FOREST SERVICE RESEARCH PAPER PSW- 4 1963 Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station - Berkeley, California Forest Service - U. S. Department of Agriculture Acknowledgments This report was prepared in cooperation with the Forestry Division, Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources. The author wishes to acknowledge with gratitude the assistance of those who helped collect data upon which this report is based and those who reviewed the report and offered suggestions for its improvement. G. D. Pickford, forest ecolo- gist, Hawaii Forestry Division, assisted in preliminary planning and gath- ering field data and offered valuable suggestions in the planning of the report. Review and criticism were offered by M. F. Landgraf, district forester for the island of Hawaii, and by L. W. Bryan, retired district forester for the island of Hawaii — both of the Hawaii Forestry Division. Mr. Bryan planned and supervised the planting of the Waiakea Arboretum. A special tribute is due these and other farsighted members of the State Forester's office whose vision and energy have made this arboretum a reality. Richmond, George B. 1963. Species Trials at the Waiakea Arboretum, Hilo, Hawaii. Berkeley, Calif., Pacific SW. Forest & Range Exp. Sta. 21 pp., illus. (U.S. Forest Serv. Res. Paper PSW- 4 ) Survival counts were made of 84 exotic tree species planted during 1956-1960 in a cleared rain-forest area near Hilo, Hawaii. Growth measurements were recorded for 5- and 6-year-old plant- ings. Most species had good survival, but some failed entirely.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for Scots Pine Blister Rust Caused by Cronartium Flaccidum
    Recovery Plan for Scots Pine Blister Rust caused by Cronartium flaccidum (Alb. & Schwein.) G. Winter and Peridermium pini (Pers.) Lév. [syn. C. asclepiadeum (Willd.) Fr., Endocronartium pini (Pers.) Y. Hiratsuka] March 12 2009 Contents page –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Executive Summary 2 Contributors and Reviewers 4 I. Introduction 4 II. Symptoms 5 III. Spread 6 IV. Monitoring and Detection 7 V. Response 8 VI. USDA Pathogens Permits 9 VII. Economic Impact and Compensation 10 VIII. Mitigation and Disease Management 11 IX. Infrastructure and Experts 14 X. Research, Extension, and Education Priorities 15 References 17 Web Resources 20 Appendix 21 –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– This recovery plan is one of several disease-specific documents produced as part of the National Plant Disease Recovery System (NPDRS) called for in Homeland Security Presidential Directive Number 9 (HSPD-9). The purpose of the NPDRS is to insure that the tools, infrastructure, communication networks, and capacity required for mitigating impacts of high-consequence, plant-disease outbreaks are in place so that a reasonable level of crop production is maintained. Each disease-specific plan is intended to provide a brief primer on the disease, assess the status of critical recovery components, and identify disease management research, extension, and education needs. These documents are not intended to be stand-alone documents that address all of the many and varied aspects of plant disease outbreak and all of the decisions that must be made and actions taken to achieve effective response and recovery. They are, however, documents that will help USDA guide further efforts directed toward plant disease recovery. 1 Executive Summary Scots pine blister rust (caused by the fungi Cronartium flaccidum and Peridermium pini) infects many Eurasian pines including Pinus sylvestris (Scots pine), Pinus pinaster, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonian Pine (Pinus Peuce)
    Technical guidelines for genetic conservation and use Macedonian pine Pinus peuce Pinus peuce Pinus peuce Pinus Alexander H. Alexandrov1 and Vlatko Andonovski2 1 Forest Research Institute, Sofia, Bulgaria 2 Faculty of Forestry, Skopje, FYR Macedonia These Technical Guidelines are intended to assist those who cherish the valuable Macedonian pine gene pool and its inheritance, through conserving valuable seed sources or use in practical forestry. The focus is on conserving the genetic diversity of the species at the European scale. The recommendations provided in this module should be regarded as a commonly agreed basis to be complemented and further developed for local, national or regional conditions. The Guidelines are based on the available knowledge of the species and on widely accepted methods for the conservation of forest genetic resources. Biology and ecology brown afterward. The branch- es are relatively thick, greenish while still young and later they Macedonian pine (Pinus peuce become grey. The brachyblasts Grisb.) is a tree reaching up to contain five fine needles each. 30-35 m in height and up to These needles are grayish-green, 50-60 cm in diameter, 50-70 mm long and 1 mm wide. but certain individu- The male reproductive or- als may reach a gans are aments of a cylindrical height of 42 m and shape, on average 13 mm long a diameter of 1.20 and up to 3.5 mm wide, and yel- m. The tree height low in colour. They are situated of this species di- in groups of 10-15 at the bases minishes strongly of growing shoots.
    [Show full text]
  • Whitebark Pine Status and the Potential Role of Biotechnology in Restoration Diana F
    Whitebark Pine Status and the Potential Role of Biotechnology in Restoration Diana F. Tomback Dept. Integrative Biology University of Colorado Denver Webinar, Committee on Forest Health and Biotechnology, NASEM, April 2, 2018. Outline of presentation • Distribution • Four case histories illustrating the threat posed by • ESA status review Cronartium ribicola • Ecology • Restoration approaches • Foundation and • How biotechnology can expedite restoration efforts keystone roles • The National Whitebark Pine Restoration Plan • Threats and trends. Willmore Wilderness Park, Alberta, Canada Taxonomy: Pinus albicaulis Engelm., whitebark pine Family Pinaceae, Genus Pinus, Subgenus Strobus, Section Quinquefoliae.* • Subsect. Strobus -“five-needle pines” (revised)*. • Most recent phylogenies for subgenus Strobus constructed from nuclear, mitochondrial, and chloroplast gene sequences show diverse affinities between P. albicaulis and species native to North America, Asia, or Europe (Hao et al. 2015). • Hao et al. (2015)—“…ancient and relatively recent introgressive hybridization events…particularly in northeastern Asia and northwestern North America.” Genome of whitebark pine characterized as extremely large and highly repetitive. *New Subsect. Strobus from combined subsects. Strobus and Cembrae, Gernandt et al. 2005; Syring et al. 2007. Whitebark pine range • Upper subalpine and treeline forest zones. • Western U.S. and Canada. • 96% of the U.S. distribution is on federally owned/managed lands. • 37o to 55o N lat. • 107o to 128o W long. • Elevation:
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Old Trees and Forests
    Identifying Old Trees and Forests IN EASTERN WASHINGTON by Robert Van Pelt Acknowledgements This guide is a companion to Identifying Mature and Old Forests in Western Washing- ton (Van Pelt, 2007). It was conceived in response to the work of the Old Growth Definition Committee. The committee was convened at the request of the Washington State Legisla- ture to map and inventory old growth forests on state trust lands managed by DNR. In the course of the committee’s work, the need became apparent for field guidance to assist field personnel in identifying individual old trees and forests. It is essential to acknowledge the people I worked with on the Old Growth Definition Com- mittee: Dr. Jerry F. Franklin, Dr. Miles Hemstrom, Joe Buchanan, Rex Crawford, Steve Curry, Sabra Hull, and Walt Obermeyer, all of whom contributed to the concepts which form the basis of this guide. Many people reviewed the text during its various iterations, which greatly contributed to improvements in both readability and scientific content: Richard Bigley Jerry Franklin Andrew Larson Ron Brightman Keala Hagman Jim Lutz Joe Buchanan Miles Hemstrom Tami Miketa Angie Cahill Sabra Hull Bob Redling Chris Earle Arthur Jacobson Jeff Ricklefs The layout and design of this guide was ably and beautifully conducted by Nancy Charbonneau and Jane Chavey of the DNR Communications Group. Photos, maps, and drawings by author except where indicated otherwise. Washington State Department of Natural Resources This guide was produced under contract as part of the ongoing research and application of new information to inform both land management and resource protection goals of Washington’s Department of Natural Resources.
    [Show full text]
  • First Report of the White Pine Blister Rust Fungus, Cronartium Ribicola, On
    Alternaria was isolated from the lesions. The pathogen was isolated on potato dextrose agar (PDA) media. On PDA. the fungus grew slowly with colonies reaching approximately 35 to 40 mm in diameter in 7 days when incubated at 30°C. Conidiophores arose singly or in groups, straight or First Report of the White Pine Blister Rust Fungus, Cronartium flexous. cylindrical, septate, pale to olivaceous brown, as much as 155 pm ribicola, on Pedicularis bracteosa. P. J. Zambino, B. A. Richardson, and long, 4 to 5.5 pm thick; conidia were straight, obclavate, pale olivaceous G. I. McDonald. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, brown, smooth, with up to 15 transverse and rarely 1 or 2 longitudinal or Moscow. ID 83843. Plant Dis. 91:467, 2007; published online as oblique septa and measured 50 to 115 x 5 to 10 pm. Pathogenicity tests doi:10.1094/PDIS-91-4-0467A.Accepted for publication 26 December were carried out three times on 6-month-old plants (n = 10). Plants were 2006. sprayed with a conidial suspension of lo5 conidialml; control plants were sprayed with sterilized water. Plants were covered with polyethylene bags Until recently, Cronarrium ribicola J.C. Fisch. was thought to utilize for 10 days. Disease symptoms appeared after 12 i- 1 day after inoculation. only Ribes spp. (Grossulariaceae) as telial hosts in North America. During Symptoms on the leaves were similar to those of a naturally occurring 2004, Pedicularis racemosa Dougl. ex Benth. and Casrilleja miniata diseased plant. The fungal pathogen was consistently reisolated from Dougl. (Orobanchaceae) were proven as natural telial hosts at a subalpine inoculated plants.
    [Show full text]
  • White Pine Blister Rust in the Interior Mountain West
    White Pine Blister Rust in the Interior Mountain West Kelly Burns1, Jim Blodgett, Dave Conklin, Brian Geils, Jim Hoffman, Marcus Jackson, William Jacobi, Holly Kearns and Anna Schoettle Introduction and Rocky Mountain Regions (Colorado, Wyoming, White pine blister rust is an exotic, invasive disease South Dakota, and Nebraska), and the eastern of white, stone, and foxtail pines (also referred to as portion of the Northern Region (central Montana white pines or five-needle pines) in the genus Pinus and North Dakota) (see Fig. 2). The infection front and subgenus Strobus (Price and others 1998). lies within this region and a large portion of its Cronartium ribicola, the fungus that causes WPBR, susceptible white pine population has not been requires an alternate host - currants and gooseberries challenged by the disease. This publication provides in the genus Ribes and species of Pedicularis and some background on the high elevation hosts and Castilleja (McDonald and others 2006, Zambino and others 2007) - to complete its life cycle. White pine synthesizes current information onthe distribution blister rust was discovered in western North and impacts of white pine blister rust in these more America in 1921. It is thought that the disease was recently infested areas. A summary of current and accidentally introduced on infected eastern white ongoing efforts for managing the disease is also pine (Pinus strobus) nursery stock shipped to provided. Vancouver, BC from Europe in the early 1900s but the specific details are unclear. Since then, the disease has spread throughout the distributions of most western white pines. Although all of the North American white pine species are susceptible to white pine blister rust (Bingham 1972, Hoff and others 1980), it was once thought that the remote, dry habitats occupied by the noncommercial, high elevation white pines would not support rust establishment.
    [Show full text]