DOCSLIB.ORG

Information to Users

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Information to Users INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMl films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from aiy type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction Is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original ihanuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Order Number 9606282 L-function for the standard tensor product representation of GSp{2) X GSp(2) Jiang, Dihua, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1994 UMI 300 N. Zeeb Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48106 L-function for the Standard Tensor Product Representation of GSp{2) X GSp{2) dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Dihua Jiang, B.S., M.S. ***** The Ohio State University 1994 Dissertation Committee: Prof. Stephen Rallis Approved by Prof. Avner Ash Prof. David Ginzburg Adviser Department of Mathematics to my wife Ying and my son Fan n A cknowledgements I wish to express my gratitude and indebtedness to my advisor and my teacher, Professor Stephen Rallis, for his bringing me into the mathematics area of Auto- morphic Representations and L-functions, for his suggestion and formulation of the research project for my Ph. D. Dissertation, and for sharing his ideas and insights during my implementation of the project. His guidance, advice, trust, patience, and supports are greatly appreciated. I am grateful to Prof. D. Ginzburg for helpful conversations during my working with the project and for his careful reading this dissertation. I would like to thank Prof. A. Ash, Prof. C. Rader, and Prof. R. Stanton for their frequent help. My thanks also go to Prof. A. Ash, Prof. .1. Hsia, Prof. M. Rosen (Brown University), Prof. K. Rubin, Prof. A. Silverberg, and Prof. R. Stanton for their wonderful topic courses on Number Theory, Algebraic Geometry, and Representation Theory. Finally, I would like to thank my family for their love, patience, and understanding throughout this time. m V i t a Oct 17, 1958 ................ Born in Wenzhou, P. R. China. 1982 ...............................B.Sc., Zhejiang Normal University, P. R. China. 1987 ...............................M.Sc., Department of Mathematics, East China Normal University, Shanghai, P. R. China. 1989-1994 .................... Graduate Teaching Associate, Department of Mathematics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. R epresentation T h e o r y a n d N u m b e r T h e o r y Major Field: Mathematics IV T a b l e o f C o n t e n t s ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................... iii VITA ............................................................................................................................. iv CHAPTER PAGE I Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 II L-function for the Standard Tensor Product Representation of GSp{2) x GSp{2) ................................................................................................................ 9 2.1 P relim in a ries ......................................................................................... 9 2.1.1 The Group of Symplectic Similitudes ........................................ 9 2.1.2 Root Systems and Representations ........................................... 11 2.1.3 The Negligibility of O rbits ........................................................... 12 2.2 Rankin-Selberg Global Zeta Integral ......................................... 14 2.2.1 The Whittaker functions on GSp{2) ...................................... 15 2.2.2 The global zeta-integral .............................................................. 19 2.3 Unramified Local Zeta Integrals ........................ 25 2.3.1 Reduction ....................................................................................... 26 2.3.2 Computation of 29 2.3.3 The Unramified Local Zeta Integral ........................................... 37 2.4 Local Langlands Factor of Degree 16 for GSp{2) x GSp{2) . 40 2.4.1 Kostant-Rallis A lgorithm ........................................................... 41 2.4.2 Symmetric Space (S'p(4),5p(2) x Sp{2))................................. 43 2.4.3 Branching formula for Sp{2) 4- SL{2) x S L { 2 )......................... 47 2.4.4 Multiplicity Z((mi,m 2 ; ni,n 2 )) .................................................... 49 2.4.5 Orbit Decomposition on {B x B)\K e....................................... 52 2.4.6 Homogeneity di((m i,m 2 ;ni, 7 1 2 )) .............................................. 61 2.4.7 Application of Kostant-Rallis’ Algorithm ................................ 85 2.4.8 The Proof of Theorem 2 .3 .1 4 ................................................... 89 2.5 The Fundamental Id e n tity ............................................................... 90 2.6 Notations Used in Chapter II ......................................................... 92 III The Local Theory of Rankin-Selberg Convolution ...................................... 93 3.1 Som e E s t im a t e s .................................................................................. 94 3.1.1 Estimates of Whittaker Functions: ......................................... 94 3.1.2 Estimates of Some Integrals ...................................................... 99 3.1.3 Estimate of the Partial ‘Fourier’ TVansform.......................... 105 3.2 Nonvanishing of Local Zeta I n te g r a ls ........................................ 112 3.2.1 Nonarchimedean C a se s: ..................................................... 112 3.2.2 Archimedean C a se s: .................................................................. 120 3.3 Absolutely Convergence of Local Zeta Integrals .................. 126 3.3.1 Nonarchimedean C a se s: ............................................................ 127 3.3.2 Archimedean C a se s: ................................................................... 132 3.4 Meromorphic Continuation of Local Zeta integrals 136 3.4.1 Nonarchimedean Case: 136 3.5 Notations Used in Chapter I II ..................................................... 146 IV The Poles of Eisenstein Series Attached to Sp{n) ...................................... 147 4.1 P^-Orbital Decomposition on \ S p {n )............................... 150 4.2 The P"-constant term of Eisenstein Series ............................... 155 4.3 Local Analyses of Intertwining Operators ............................... 162 4.3.1 Intertwining Operator ^(g): general sections ................. 163 4.3.2 Intertwining Operator general sections ................... 166 4.3.3 Intertwining Operator ^(s): general sections .................... 174 4.3.4 Intertwining Operators U^^(s), % (s), and U^^{s): spherical section ............................................................................................ 182 4.4 Poles of Eisenstein Series: n < 3 .................................................. 188 4.4.1 Proof of Theorem 4.4.4 for the case of s ....................... 194 4.4.2 Proof of Theorem 4.4.4 for the case of s = |: ....................... 196 4.5 Poles of Eisenstein S e r i e s .............................................................. 207 4.6 P roof o f Two L e m m a s .................................................................... 216 4.7 Notations Used in Chapter I V ..................................................... 227 VI V Degenerate Principal Series Representations of Sp{n) over a p-adic Field 228 5.1 Basic F a c t s ........................................................................................... 229 5.2 Computations of Hecke Operators ............................................... 236 5.2.1 Hecke Operator A ...................................................................... 236 5.2.2 Hecke Operator W ...................................................................... 255 5.3 P roof of th e M ain T h eo rem ........................................................... 258 5.3.1 The Dimension of ifomsp( 4 )(/ 3 (s),/ 3 (—s)): ......................... 258 5.3.2 The Proof of the Main Theorem : ............................................. 261 5.4 N otations U sed in Chapter V ........................................................ 269 BIBLIOGRAPHY.....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arxiv:Math/9911264V1 [Math.NT] 1 Nov 1999
    Annals of Mathematics, 150 (1999), 807–866 On explicit lifts of cusp forms from GLm to classical groups By David Ginzburg, Stephen Rallis, and David Soudry* Introduction In this paper, we begin the study of poles of partial L-functions LS(σ ⊗ τ,s), where σ ⊗ τ is an irreducible, automorphic, cuspidal, generic (i.e. with nontrivial Whittaker coefficient) representation of GA × GLm(A). G is a split classical group and A is the adele ring of a number field F . We also consider Sp2n(A) × GLm(A), where ∼ denotes the metaplectic cover. Examining LS(σ ⊗ τ,s) through the corresponding Rankin-Selberg, or Shimura-typef integrals ([G-PS-R], [G-R-S3], [G], [So]), we find that the global integral contains, in its integrand, a certain normalized Eisenstein series which is responsible for the poles. For example, if G = SO2k+1, then the Eisenstein series is on the adele points of split SO2m, induced from the Siegel parabolic s−1/2 subgroup and τ ⊗ | det ·| . If G = Sp2k (this is a convenient abuse of notation), then the Eisenstein series is on Sp2m(A), induced from the Siegel parabolic subgroup and τ ⊗ | det ·|s−1/2. Thef constant term (along the “Siegel radical”) of such a normalized Eisenstein series involves one of the L-functions LS(τ, Λ2, 2s − 1) or LS(τ, Sym2, 2s − 1). So, up to problems of normalization of intertwining operators, the only pole we expect, for Re(s) > 1/2, is at s = 1 and then τ should be self-dual. (See [J-S1], [B-G].) Thus, let us assume that τ is self-dual.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Report for 2012
    Scientific Report for 2012 Impressum: Eigent¨umer,Verleger, Herausgeber: The Erwin Schr¨odingerInternational Institute for Mathematical Physics - University of Vienna (DVR 0065528), Boltzmanngasse 9, A-1090 Vienna. Redaktion: Joachim Schwermer, Jakob Yngvason. Supported by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Science and Research (BMWF) via the University of Vienna. Contents Preface 3 The Institute and its Mission . 3 Scientific activities in 2012 . 4 The ESI in 2012 . 7 Scientific Reports 9 Main Research Programmes . 9 Automorphic Forms: Arithmetic and Geometry . 9 K-theory and Quantum Fields . 14 The Interaction of Geometry and Representation Theory. Exploring new frontiers. 18 Modern Methods of Time-Frequency Analysis II . 22 Workshops Organized Outside the Main Programmes . 32 Operator Related Function Theory . 32 Higher Spin Gravity . 34 Computational Inverse Problems . 35 Periodic Orbits in Dynamical Systems . 37 EMS-IAMP Summer School on Quantum Chaos . 39 Golod-Shafarevich Groups and Algebras, and the Rank Gradient . 41 Recent Developments in the Mathematical Analysis of Large Systems . 44 9th Vienna Central European Seminar on Particle Physics and Quantum Field Theory: Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Black Holes and Quantum Aspects of the Universe . 46 Dynamics of General Relativity: Black Holes and Asymptotics . 47 Research in Teams . 49 Bruno Nachtergaele et al: Disordered Oscillator Systems . 49 Alexander Fel'shtyn et al: Twisted Conjugacy Classes in Discrete Groups . 50 Erez Lapid et al: Whittaker Periods of Automorphic Forms . 53 Dale Cutkosky et al: Resolution of Surface Singularities in Positive Characteristic . 55 Senior Research Fellows Programme . 57 James Cogdell: L-functions and Functoriality . 57 Detlev Buchholz: Fundamentals and Highlights of Algebraic Quantum Field Theory .
    [Show full text]
  • On a Correspondence Between Cuspidal
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 12, Number 3, Pages 849{907 S 0894-0347(99)00300-8 Article electronically published on April 26, 1999 ON A CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN CUSPIDAL REPRESENTATIONS OF GL2n AND Sp2n f DAVID GINZBURG, STEPHEN RALLIS, AND DAVID SOUDRY Introduction Let K be a number field and A its ring of adeles. Let η be an irreducible, automorphic, cuspidal representation of GLm(A). Assume that η is self-dual. By Langlands conjectures, we expect that η is the functorial lift of an irreducible, automorphic, cuspidal representation σ of G(A), where G is an appropriate classical group defined over K. We know by [J.S.1] that the partial (as well as the complete) L-function LS(η η, s) has a (simple) pole at s = 1. Thus, since LS(η η, s)= LS(η, Sym2,s)LS⊗(η, Λ2,s), either LS(η, Λ2,s)orLS(η, Sym2,s) has a pole⊗ at s =1. If m =2n, then one expects that in the first case G =SO2n+1, and in the second S 2 case G =SO2n.Ifm=2n+ 1, we know that L (η, Λ ,s)isentire(see[J.S.2]), S 2 and hence L (η, Sym ,s) has a pole at s = 1. Here, one expects that G =Sp2n. In [G.R.S.1], we started a program to prove the existence of σ as above. See also [G.R.S.2], [G.R.S.3]. We proposed to prove this existence by explicit construc- tion. We constructed a space Vσ(η) of automorphic forms on G(A), invariant under right translations.
    [Show full text]
  • On $(\Chi, B) $-Factors of Cuspidal Automorphic Representations Of
    ON (χ, b)-FACTORS OF CUSPIDAL AUTOMORPHIC REPRESENTATIONS OF UNITARY GROUPS I DIHUA JIANG AND CHENYAN WU Dedicated to Wen-Ching Winnie Li Abstract. Following the idea of [GJS09] for orthogonal groups, we introduce a new family of period integrals for cuspidal auto- morphic representations σ of unitary groups and investigate their relation with the occurrence of a simple global Arthur parameter (χ,b) in the global Arthur parameter ψσ associated to σ, by the endoscopic classification of Arthur ([Art13], [Mok13], [KMSW14]). The argument uses the theory of theta correspondence. This can be viewed as a part of the (χ,b)-theory outlined in [Jia14] and can be regarded as a refinement of the theory of theta correspondences and poles of certain L-functions, which was outlined in [Ral91]. 1. Introduction Let F be a number field and E be a quadratic extension of F . We denote by A = AF the ring of adeles of F , and by AE that of E. Let G be a unitary group associated to an m-dimensional skew-Hermitian vector space X. Consider σ in Acusp(G), the set of equivalence classes of irreducible cuspidal automorphic representations of G that occurs in the discrete spectrum, following the notation of [Art13]. Let χ be an automorphic character of GL1(AE). The tensor product L-functions L(s, σ × χ) has been investigated through the work of Li in [Li92b] arXiv:1409.0767v3 [math.NT] 1 Dec 2014 by using the doubling method of Piatetski-Shapiro and Rallis, and the work of Langlands by calculating constant terms of the Eisenstein series with cuspidal support χ ⊗ σ ([Lan71] and [Sha10]).
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Lectures in Mathematics (ALM)
    Advanced Lectures in Mathematics (ALM) ALM 1: Superstring Theory ALM 2: Asymptotic Theory in Probability and Statistics with Applications ALM 3: Computational Conformal Geometry ALM 4: Variational Principles for Discrete Surfaces ALM 6: Geometry, Analysis and Topology of Discrete Groups ALM 7: Handbook of Geometric Analysis, No. 1 ALM 8: Recent Developments in Algebra and Related Areas ALM 9: Automorphic Forms and the Langlands Program ALM 10: Trends in Partial Differential Equations ALM 11: Recent Advances in Geometric Analysis ALM 12: Cohomology of Groups and Algebraic K-theory ALM 13: Handbook of Geometric Analysis, No. 2 ALM 14: Handbook of Geometric Analysis, No. 3 ALM 15: An Introduction to Groups and Lattices: Finite Groups and Positive Definite Rational Lattices ALM 16: Transformation Groups and Moduli Spaces of Curves ALM 17: Geometry and Analysis, No. 1 ALM 18: Geometry and Analysis, No. 2 ALM 19: Arithmetic Geometry and Automorphic Forms ALM 20: Surveys in Geometric Analysis and Relativity Advanced Lectures in Mathematics Volume XIX Arithmetic Geometry and Automorphic Forms edited by James Cogdell · Jens Funke · Michael Rapoport · Tonghai Yang International Press 浧䷘㟨十⒉䓗䯍 www.intlpress.com HIGHER EDUCATION PRESS Advanced Lectures in Mathematics, Volume XIX Arithmetic Geometry and Automorphic Forms Volume Editors: James Cogdell, Ohio State University at Columbus Jens Funke, Durham University Michael Rapoport, Universität Bonn Tonghai Yang, University of Wisconsin at Madison 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 11G18, 11G40, 11G50, 14C15, 14C17, 14C25. Copyright © 2011 by International Press, Somerville, Massachusetts, U.S.A., and by Higher Education Press, Beijing, China. This work is published and sold in China exclusively by Higher Education Press of China.
    [Show full text]
  • Automorphic Integral Transforms for Classical Groups I: Endoscopy Correspondences
    Contemporary Mathematics Volume 614, 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/conm/614/12253 Automorphic Integral Transforms for Classical Groups I: Endoscopy Correspondences Dihua Jiang Abstract. A general framework for constructions of endoscopy correspon- dences via automorphic integral transforms for classical groups is formulated in terms of the Arthur classification of the discrete spectrum of square-integrable automorphic forms, which is called the Principle of Endoscopy Correspon- dences, extending the well-known Howe Principle of Theta Correspondences. This suggests another principle, called the (τ,b)-theory of automorphic forms of classical groups, to reorganize and extend the series of work of Piatetski- Shapiro, Rallis, Kudla and others on standard L-functions of classical groups and theta correspondence. 1. Introduction Automorphic forms are transcendental functions with abundant symmetries, and fundamental objects to arithmetic and geometry. In the theory of automorphic forms, it is an important and difficult problem to construct explicitly automorphic forms with specified properties, in particular, to construct cuspidal automorphic forms of various types. Ilya Piatetski-Shapiro is a pioneer to use representation theory to study au- tomorphic forms. The main idea is to construct certain models of representation- theoretic nature to obtain cuspidal automorphic forms, that is, to explicitly realize cuspidal automorphic forms in the space of functions over certain geometric spaces. The celebrated theorem of Gelfand and Piatetski-Shapiro shows that all cuspidal automorphic forms are rapidly decreasing on a fundamental domain D when ap- proaching the cusps, and hence can be realized discretely in the space L2(D)ofall square integrable functions on D. Therefore, it is fundamental to understand the space L2(D) or more precisely the discrete spectrum of L2(D).
    [Show full text]
  • Models for Certain Residual Representations of Unitary Groups
    Contemporary Mathematics Models for Certain Residual Representations of Unitary Groups David Ginzburg, Dihua Jiang, and Stephen Rallis We dedicate this paper to Stephen Gelbart on the occasion of his 60th birthday Abstract. In this paper, we consider the generalized Gelfand-Graev mod- els for automorphic forms on unitary groups, which characterize the existence of certain residual representations for unitary groups. As one of the conse- quences, we obtain results related to the Gross-Prasad type conjecture for unitary groups. 1. Introduction One of the main problems in the modern theory of automorphic forms is to understand the discrete spectrum of the space of square integrable automorphic functions of a reductive algebraic group de¯ned over a number ¯eld. The non- cuspidal part of the discrete spectrum is generated by the residues of Eisenstein series following the theory of Langlands ([MW95]). It is still an open problem to determine which residues of Eisenstein series do occur in the residual spectrum. The traditional approach follows from the Langlands theory of constant terms of Eisenstein series, which has been proved to be quite successful for certain families of Eisenstein series. For the general linear groups, the residual spectrum has been completely determined by the work of Moeglin and Waldspurger ([MW89]). The result turns out to be as conjectured by Jacquet ([J84]). Some lower rank cases have also been treated by this approach. Starting with the work of Jacquet and Rallis ([JR92]), another approach to determine the residual spectrum has taken place. This approach is based on the inner structure of the cuspidal data, which one uses to build the Eisenstein series.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTEMPORARY MATHEMATICS 488 Israel Mathematical Conference Proceedings
    CONTEMPORARY MATHEMATICS 488 Israel Mathematical Conference Proceedings Automorphic Forms and L-functions I. Global Aspects A Workshop in Honor of Steve Gelbart on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday May 15–19, 2006 Rehovot and Tel Aviv, Israel David Ginzburg Erez Lapid David Soudry Editors American Mathematical Society Providence, Rhode Island Bar-Ilan University Ramat Gam, Israel http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/conm/488 Automorphic Forms and L-functions I. Global Aspects Photograph by David Soudry Photograph by David Steve Gelbart CONTEMPORARY MATHEMATICS 488 Israel Mathematical Conference Proceedings Automorphic Forms and L-functions I. Global Aspects A Workshop in Honor of Steve Gelbart on the Occasion of His Sixtieth Birthday May 15-19, 2006 Rehovot and Tel Aviv, Israel David Ginzburg Erez Lapid David Soudry Editors American Mathematical Society Providence, Rhode Island Bar-Ilan University Ramat Gam, Israel Editorial Board of Contemporary Mathematics Dennis DeTurck, managing editor George Andrews Abel Klein Martin J. Strauss Editorial Board of Israel Mathematical Conference Proceedings Louis Rowen, Bar-Ilan University, managing editor Z. Arad, Netanya Academic College M. Katz, Bar-Ilan University J. Bernstein, Tel-Aviv University B. Pinchuk, Netanya Academic College H. Furstenberg, Hebrew University S. Shnider, Bar-Ilan University S. Gelbart, Weizmann Institute L. Small, University of California at San Diego V. Goldshtein, Ben-Gurion University L. Zalcman, Bar-Ilan University Miriam Beller, Technical Editor 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 11F70, 11F67; Secondary 11F72, 11F27, 11F33, 11F75, 11F80. Photo courtesy of David Soudry. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Automorphic forms and L-functions : proceedings of a workshop in honor of Steve Gelbart on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday : May 15–19, 2006, Rehovot and Tel Aviv, Israel / David Ginzburg, Erez Lapid, David Soudry, editors.
    [Show full text]
  • L-Functions for Symplectic Groups Using Fourier-Jacobi Models
    L-FUNCTIONS FOR SYMPLECTIC GROUPS USING FOURIER-JACOBI MODELS DAVID GINZBURG, DIHUA JIANG, STEPHEN RALLIS, AND DAVID SOUDRY This paper is dedicated to Stephen Kudla on the occasion of his 60th birthday. Abstract. In this note, we introduce a global integral of Rankin-Selberg and Shimura type, which represents the tensor L-function of a pair of irreducible, cuspidal, automorphic representations of Sp2k(A) and GLm(A), respectively. This construction is completely general and applies to any cuspidal represen- tation of the symplectic group. We use this construction to characterize some CAP representations of symplectic groups and give some information on poles of L-functions. 1. Introduction In this announcement, we introduce and study a family of new global integrals of Rankin-Selberg and Shimura type, which represent the tensor L-function of a pair of irreducible, cuspidal, automorphic representations π and τ of the symplectic group Sp2k(A) and GLm(A), respectively. Here A is the ring of Adeles of a number field F . Following Langlands, one may define (for Re(s) large) the partial tensor L- function LS(π × τ; s), with S being a finite set of places of F , containing those at infinity, and outside of which, all local components of π and τ are unramified. In order to study further properties of the partial tensor L-function LS(π × τ; s), we introduce a global integral, which represents LS(π × τ; s) in the sense that (for decomposable data, unramified outside S) the global integral is an Eulerian product over all local places of F (Theorems 3.2 and 3.3) and the partial Eulerian product over the local places outside S yields LS(π×τ; s) (Theorem 4.3).
    [Show full text]
  • Eulerianity of Fourier Coefficients of Automorphic Forms
    REPRESENTATION THEORY An Electronic Journal of the American Mathematical Society Volume 25, Pages 481–507 (June 7, 2021) https://doi.org/10.1090/ert/565 EULERIANITY OF FOURIER COEFFICIENTS OF AUTOMORPHIC FORMS DMITRY GOUREVITCH, HENRIK P. A. GUSTAFSSON, AXEL KLEINSCHMIDT, DANIEL PERSSON, AND SIDDHARTHA SAHI Abstract. We study the question of Eulerianity (factorizability) for Fourier coefficients of automorphic forms, and we prove a general transfer theorem that allows one to deduce the Eulerianity of certain coefficients from that of another coefficient. We also establish a ‘hidden’ invariance property of Fourier coefficients. We apply these results to minimal and next-to-minimal automor- phic representations, and deduce Eulerianity for a large class of Fourier and Fourier–Jacobi coefficients. In particular, we prove Eulerianity for parabolic Fourier coefficients with characters of maximal rank for a class of Eisenstein series in minimal and next-to-minimal representations of groups of ADE-type that are of interest in string theory. Contents 1. Introduction 481 2. Preliminaries 485 3. General results 490 4. Applications to small representations 492 5. Eisenstein series 494 Acknowledgments 504 References 504 1. Introduction In the classical theory of modular forms for SL2 the study of Fourier coefficients is instrumental for revealing arithmetic information. For example, Fourier coefficients of Eisenstein series carry information on the analytic continuation of zeta functions, while Fourier coefficients of theta functions yield important results for Euclidean lattices (see, e.g., [Ser73]). For automorphic forms on groups of higher rank the study of Fourier coefficients is crucial when proving the meromorphic continuation of Langlands L-functions as well as analysing the trace formula, both of which Received by the editors May 12, 2020, and, in revised form, October 7, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Report for the Years 1993 – 2002
    The Erwin Schr¨odinger International Boltzmanngasse 9/2 ESI Institute for Mathematical Physics A-1090 Vienna, Austria Scientific Report for the years 1993 – 2002 Impressum: Eigent¨umer, Verleger, Herausgeber: The Erwin Schr¨odinger International Institute for Math- ematical Physics, Boltzmanngasse 9, A-1090 Vienna. Redaktion: Peter W. Michor, Klaus Schmidt Supported by the Austrian Federal Ministry for Education, Science and Culture. Contents I Introduction 5 A preface by the President . ... 7 ESI and the Austrian scientific community . .... 8 Aboutthisreport....................................... ..... 9 II Scientific Report 11 Activities in 1992 preceding the official opening of the Institute 13 Conference on ‘Interfaces between mathematics and physics’ . 13 Conference ‘75 years of Radon transform’ . 13 The year 1993 15 Generalremarks ......................................... 15 Programsin1993..................................... ....... 16 Two dimensional quantum field theory . 16 Schr¨odinger operators . 19 Differentialgeometry.................................... 21 Visitorsoutsidethemainprograms. ......... 23 The year 1994 25 Generalremarks ......................................... 25 Programsin1994..................................... ....... 26 Ergodicity in non-commutative algebras . 26 Mathematicalrelativity ................................. 26 Quaternionic and hyper-K¨ahler manifolds . 28 Spinors, twistors and conformal invariants . ........ 30 Gibbsian random fields . 31 Workshops organized outside the main programs . ...... 31 Winter
    [Show full text]
  • Gelfand Pairs and Invariant Distributions
    Weizmann Institute of Science Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Gelfand pairs and Invariant Distributions Thesis submitted for the degree \Doctor of Philosophy" by Avraham Aizenbud Submitted to the Scientific Council of the Weizmann Institute of Science Rehovot, Israel Prepared at the Mathematics Department under the supervision of Professor Vladimir Berkovich and Professor Joseph Bernstein July 2010 To my beloved wife This work was carried out under the supervision of Professor Vladimir Berkovich and Professor Joseph Bernstein 3 Acknowledgements First of all, I would like to thank my advisors Vladimir Berkovich and Joseph Bern- stein for guiding me through my PhD studies. I have been learning from Joseph Bern- stein since the age of 15. During this period, I have learned from him most of the mathematics I know. In addition, he has shown me his special approach to mathemat- ics. I hope that I have managed to comprehend at least part of it. When I started my PhD studies in the Weizmann Institute I have gained an additional supervisor Vladimir Berkovich. He has taken a great care of me and taught me his unique and fascinating approach to mathematics. I am deeply grateful to Dmitry Gourevitch who has been my friend and collab- orator for already more than a decade. The overwhelming majority of my mathematical studies and research were done in a close collaboration with him. In particular, a big part of this thesis is based on joint work with him. I would also like to thank the rest of my collaborators Nir Avni, Herve Jacquet, Erez Lapid, Stephen Rallis, Eitan Sayag, Gerard Schiffmann, Oded Yacobi, Frol Zapolsky from whom I have learned a lot.
    [Show full text]