DOCSLIB.ORG

Abortion Statistics, England and Wales: 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Abortion Statistics, England and Wales: 2019 Abortion Statistics, England and Wales: 2019 Summary information from the abortion notification forms returned to the Chief Medical Officers of England and Wales. January to December 2019. Published 11 June 2020, an annual update. Abortion Statistics, England and Wales: 2019 Contents Contents .............................................................................................................................. 2 Key events ........................................................................................................................... 3 Key points in 2019 ............................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 5 Further information ........................................................................................................... 5 Previous publications ........................................................................................................ 5 2. Commentary .................................................................................................................. 6 Overall number and rate of abortions ............................................................................... 6 Age ................................................................................................................................... 6 Marital status .................................................................................................................... 7 Ethnicity ............................................................................................................................ 8 Area of residence within England & Wales ....................................................................... 8 Location and funding of abortions ..................................................................................... 9 Statutory grounds for abortion .......................................................................................... 9 Legal abortions performed under ground E .................................................................... 11 Gestation period ............................................................................................................. 11 Previous abortions .......................................................................................................... 12 Previous obstetric history ............................................................................................... 12 Method of abortion .......................................................................................................... 12 Complications ................................................................................................................. 14 Selective terminations .................................................................................................... 15 Women resident outside England and Wales ................................................................. 15 Abortions for women from Northern Ireland .................................................................... 15 Abortions for women from the Irish Republic .................................................................. 15 Abortion rates by Index of Multiple Deprivation, (IMD), deciles ...................................... 16 Age range analysis by Index of Multiple Deprivation, (IMD), deciles .............................. 17 Glossary ......................................................................................................................... 18 2 Abortion Statistics, England and Wales: 2019 Key events Date Key event October Abortion Act 1967 passed. Introduced by David Steel and supported by the 1967 government under a free vote. It legalised abortion on certain grounds, by legalised practitioners, in England, Wales and Scotland. The act came into effect on 27 April 1968. November The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill lowered the gestation limit for 1990 abortions from 28 weeks to 24 weeks. This is the currently accepted point at which the fetus is considered viable outside the mother's body. The act came into effect on 1 April 1991. June Northern Ireland funding scheme introduced, to provide funded abortions in 2017 England and Wales, for residents of Northern Ireland. In cases of hardship, travel costs are also covered. Funding is provided by the Government Equalities Office and HM Treasury. June Women in Wales, and from 28 December 2018 women in England, can take 2018 the second of the two abortion pills, misoprostol, at home. This brought England and Wales in line with Scotland, which allowed the second pill to be taken at home from October 2017. December Abortion legalised on certain grounds, in the Irish Republic, up to 12 weeks 2018 gestation and later if the woman's life or health is at risk. The law came into effect on 20 December 2018. October Abortion in Northern Ireland decriminalised after a free vote by Westminster 2019 MPs in July. The suspended Northern Ireland Executive did not return by 21 October 2019, meaning the amendment introduced by Stella Creasy was passed into law through The Northern Ireland (Executive Formation etc) Act 2019 on 22 October 2019. March The Abortion (Northern Ireland) Regulations 2020 came into force on 31 2020 March 2020. The regulations introduce a new legal framework for abortion services in Northern Ireland. 3 Abortion Statistics, England and Wales: 2019 Key points in 2019 Chart Key point 210,000 Abortions, numbers, England and Wales, 2010-2019 There were 207,384 abortions for women 200,000 resident in England and Wales, the highest Numbers 190,000 number since the Abortion Act was 180,000 introduced. 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 19 Abortions, rates, England and Wales, 2010-2019 The age standardised abortion rate for 18 residents is 18.0 per 1,000 women, the 17 highest rate since the ASR ASR perrates 1,000 women1,000 Abortion Act was 16 introduced. 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 21 Abortions, rates, under 18 and over 35, England and Wales, The abortion rate for 2010-2019 women aged under 18 16 Under 18 is the same as in 2018 (8.1 per 1,000), but has 35 or over increased for women women 11 over 35 (from 9.2 to 9.7 Crude rate per 1,000 1,000 per rate Crude per 1,000 between 6 2018 and 2019). 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 99% of abortions in Abortions, purchaser, percentages, England and Wales, 2010-2019 100 England & Wales were NHS Funded: Independent Sector 90 funded by the NHS in 80 2019, with 74% of all 70 abortions taking place in the independent Percentage 60 50 sector. 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Abortions, procedures, percentages, England and Wales, 2010- 73% of abortions were 2019 medically induced; 100 All surgical All medical which increased from 71% in 2018, and 60 increasing by 33 percentage points since Percentage 2009. 20 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 4 Abortion Statistics, England and Wales: 2019 1. Introduction 1.1 This report provides statistics on abortions recorded in England and Wales in 2019. The information presented is based on abortion notification forms (HSA4) submitted by clinics and hospitals to the Chief Medical Officer (CMO) at the Department of Health & Social Care (DHSC). DHSC monitor the forms to ensure that there is full compliance with the legislation set out in the Abortion Act, 1967. Further information 1.2 Further details on the legislative context of the Abortion Act, in addition to methodological and technical information on the data can be found in the ‘Guide to Abortion Statistics’, in Abortion statistics for England and Wales: 2019. Previous publications 1.3 The Department of Health & Social Care (DHSC) has published abortion statistics annually since 2002. Statistics for years from 1974 to 2001 were published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) in their Abortion Statistics Series AB, Nos 1 to 28. The reports for 1991 to 2001 are available electronically on request to [email protected]. Statistics for years from 1968 to 1973 were published in the Registrar General’s Statistical Review of England and Wales, Supplement on Abortion. 1.4 The most recent versions of the publication are available from the GOV.UK website. 1.5 Contact us at [email protected]. 1.6 Abortion statistics cover the period January to December 2019 and are published annually. The next publication will be in June 2021, and will cover January to December 2020. 5 Abortion Statistics, England and Wales: 2019 2. Commentary Unless specified, the following commentary, charts and tables relate only to abortions in England and Wales, for residents of England and Wales, in 2019. Overall number and rate of abortions 2.1 Of the 209,519 abortions notified as taking place in England and Wales, 207,384 were to residents of England and Wales. This represents an age-standardised abortion rate (ASR) of 18.0 per 1,000 resident women aged 15-44. The ASR rate has increased since 2018, (17.4 per 1,000 resident women aged 15-44). This is the highest rate recorded, exceeding the previous peak in 2007, (17.9 abortions per 1,000 resident women aged 15-44). (Table 1 and Figure 1). Figure 1: Age Standardised abortion rate per 1,000 women aged 15-44, England and Wales, 1970 to 2019 Age 2.2 The abortion rate in 2019 was highest for women aged 22 (at 31.6 per 1,000 women).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Abortion and the Law in New
    NSW PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICE Abortion and the law in New South Wales by Talina Drabsch Briefing Paper No 9/05 ISSN 1325-4456 ISBN 0 7313 1784 X August 2005 © 2005 Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent from the Librarian, New South Wales Parliamentary Library, other than by Members of the New South Wales Parliament in the course of their official duties. Abortion and the law in New South Wales by Talina Drabsch NSW PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICE David Clune (MA, PhD, Dip Lib), Manager..............................................(02) 9230 2484 Gareth Griffith (BSc (Econ) (Hons), LLB (Hons), PhD), Senior Research Officer, Politics and Government / Law .........................(02) 9230 2356 Talina Drabsch (BA, LLB (Hons)), Research Officer, Law ......................(02) 9230 2768 Lenny Roth (BCom, LLB), Research Officer, Law ...................................(02) 9230 3085 Stewart Smith (BSc (Hons), MELGL), Research Officer, Environment ...(02) 9230 2798 John Wilkinson (MA, PhD), Research Officer, Economics.......................(02) 9230 2006 Should Members or their staff require further information about this publication please contact the author. Information about Research Publications can be found on the Internet at: www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/WEB_FEED/PHWebContent.nsf/PHPages/LibraryPublications Advice on
    [Show full text]
  • 30032020 the Abortion Act 1967
    The Abortion Act 1967 - Approval of a Class of Places This approval supersedes the approval of 27 December 2018. This approval expires on the day on which the temporary provisions of the Coronavirus Act 2020 expire, or the end of the period of 2 years beginning with the day on which it is made, whichever is earlier. The Secretary of State makes the following approval in exercise of the powers conferred by section 1(3) and (3A) 1of the Abortion Act 19672: Interpretation 1. In this approval – “home” means, in the case of a pregnant woman, the place in England where a pregnant woman has her permanent address or usually resides or, in the case of a registered medical practitioner, the place in England where a registered medical practitioner has their permanent address or usually resides; “approved place” means a hospital in England, as authorised under section 1(3) of the Abortion Act 1967, or a place in England approved under that section. Approval of class of place 2. The home of a registered medical practitioner is approved as a class of place for treatment for the termination of pregnancy for the purposes only of prescribing the medicines known as Mifepristone and Misoprostol to be used in treatment carried out in the manner specified in paragraph 4. 3. The home of a pregnant woman who is undergoing treatment for the purposes of termination of her pregnancy is approved as a class of place where the treatment for termination of pregnancy may be carried out where that treatment is carried out in the manner specified in paragraph 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Gibraltar Command Paper on Abortion British Pregnancy Advisory Service Response
    Gibraltar Command Paper on Abortion British Pregnancy Advisory Service Response The British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) is a British reproductive healthcare charity that offers abortion care, contraception, STI testing, and pregnancy counselling to nearly 80,000 women each year via our clinics in Great Britain. We also treat women from Northern Ireland, Ireland, and Europe where their domestic laws prevent them accessing the care they need. As part of our advocacy work to enable the women we treat to get the best possible care, we campaign for the decriminalisation of abortion. We do not believe there are circumstances where it is ever appropriate to imprison a woman for making a decision about her own pregnancy Proposals BPAS welcomes this Command Paper and the desire to ensure that abortion law in Gibraltar is in line with human rights legislation. Based on our experience providing abortion care under the Abortion Act 1967 from which this proposal is transcribed, we have a number of proposals, produced in support of the proposals of local pro-choice groups, to ensure that international standards are met and women in Gibraltar are better able to access the care they need. These proposed changes would see the creation of abortion legislation similar to that of Ireland, the Isle of Man, France, and other European nations. Decriminalisation of women. There is no place in law for the continued criminalisation of women seeking to end their own pregnancies. It is out of step with most of Europe, with the USA, Canada, multiple states in America, and – most notably – with the new legislation being brought forward in Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion: Covid-19: Approval for Mifepristone to Be Taken At
    Chief Medical Officer Directorate Dear Colleague From the Chief Medical Officer Dr Catherine Calderwood MA Cantab MBChB FRCOG FRCP Abortion – Covid-19 – Approval For Mifepristone To Be (Ed) FRCP (Glasgow) Taken At Home And Other Contingency Measures FRCS(Ed) HonFFPH ____________________________ Purpose 31 March 2020 ____________________________ 1. Abortion treatment remains an essential service so this letter provides details of some temporary measures to help SGHD/CMO(2020)9 ____________________________ minimise disruption to patient treatment at the current time. The primary purpose of this letter is to notify you that Scottish Addresses Ministers have granted approval for both stages of early For action Territorial NHS Board Chief medical abortion treatment to be undertaken in a patient’s Executives home in certain circumstances. This letter also clarifies, and advises on, some other areas of contingency planning in For information Directors of Public Health relation to the provision of abortion treatment in Scotland at Sexual Health and BBV Strategic this time. Leads NHS Abortion Leads Private Hospital Abortion Service New early medical abortion at home approval Managers ____________________________ 2. In addition to the existing approval for early medical Further Enquiries abortion at home (EMAH), which allow misoprostol to be taken at a patient’s home, Scottish Ministers have agreed to Please contact approve a patient’s place of ordinary residence in Scotland as Sam Baker [email protected] a class of place where mifepristone may also be taken where a medical practitioner or nurse decides that it is clinically Rachel Tatler appropriate and where it is not advisable for the patient to [email protected] attend a clinic or hospital for their treatment due to risks associated with spread of COVID-19.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotland and the Abortion Act 1967: Historic Flaws, Contemporary Problems
    Page | 1 SCOTLAND AND THE ABORTION ACT 1967: HISTORIC FLAWS, CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS 1 JONATHAN BROWN 1 PhD Candidate at the University of Strathclyde and Law Tutor at Glasgow Caledonian University Page | 2 INTRODUCTION The law relating to abortion in Scotland, England and Wales is ostensibly governed by a single Act: the Abortion Act 1967.2 This legislation was created to remove the dangers of the “back-alley abortionist with her knitting needles”3 – as it has broadly succeeding in doing so,4 most commentators regard the Act as a success.5 With that said, the 1967 Act has been described as a “curious”6 piece of legislation due to the fact that it does not grant any rights to women that seek to terminate pregnancy. Instead, it simply confers a privilege upon doctors who carry out abortion procedures.7 In addition, though many think otherwise,8 the 1967 Act neither confirmed nor created a uniform legal approach towards abortion in the United Kingdom. Prior to 1967 abortion was a wholly common law matter in Scotland9 and there were recognised, if nebulous,10 defences to the crime. Conversely, in England, the issue of abortion – its status as a social and criminal concern – has been determined by statute since 1861, with the passing of the Offences against the Person Act.11 Due to these fundamental differences in legal governance, the wording of the Act and the Act’s reliance on English statute, the Scottish legal position remains 2 c.87 – henceforth referred to as ‘the 1967 Act’. The Act does not extend to Northern Ireland: See s.7 3 See Davis, The Legalisation of Therapeutic Abortion, [1968] S.L.T 205 4 Davis, The Legalisation of Therapeutic Abortion, [1968] S.L.T 205, though there are, of course, some unfortunate exceptions; see R v Catt [2013] EWCA Crim 1187 5 G.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Abortion Abortion Is a Sensitive Issue, With
    Abortion Abortion is a sensitive issue, with ongoing ethical and moral debates relating too: • The status of the unborn • Pregnancy, contraception and birth control • Time limits for abortion and start of life issues • ‘Back-street’ abortions of the 1950s and 60s • Sexual awareness and education • Severe mental and physical disability • Counselling and provision of information • A woman’s right to choose • Abortion ‘on demand’ and the need for two doctors’ signatures • Social factors which increase the likelihood of an abortion being sought Many different views are held on these issues and how they relate to the law. Some people want a shortening of the time limit on abortions, from 24 weeks to 20 or 13, whereas others would like much stricter controls or a total ban on all abortions. Some people are happy with the status quo. Some people would like abortions to be made easier to obtain, perhaps by removing the requirement to get two doctors’ signatures before an abortion can take place. 27 October 2007 is the 40 th anniversary of the passing of the 1967 Abortion Act. Abortions were made legal when the Act came into effect on 27 April 1968. This paper aims to explore some political, ethical and scientific issues around abortion in the UK today. The Abortion Act 1967 and the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 David – later Lord – Steel introduced the Abortion Act as a Private Members Bill. David Steel was a member of the Liberal party. Harold Wilson’s Labour Government supported the Bill, which passed on a free vote. In 1967 there was considerable public support to allow abortion in certain circumstances where the life of the mother was at risk or the baby would be seriously disabled.
    [Show full text]
  • Into the Hands of the Medical Profession: the Regulation of Abortion in England Ane Wales
    U j-t lili -i '. ;v,r!ji SALLY SHELDON r -;v p . :T $ m •;■ : ili ■*:■ lit INTO THE HANDS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION: THE REGULATION OF ABORTION IN ENGLAND ANE WALES Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the Degree of Doctor of the European University Institute. Florence, August 1994 EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE H C i U À . 1 j r SALLY SHELDON ^ j j INTO THE HANDS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION: THE REGULATION OF ABORTION IN ENGLAND AND WALES Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the Degree of Doctor of the European University Institute. LRU) H C n h d kS SHE Florence, August 1994 "One example has been given to me by a general practitioner of a girt, unmarried, and, therefore, one of the minority of cases of illegal abortion, who came to him about two or three months ago, said she was pregnant, and that she wished to have her pregnancy terminated...She said to him that she had come because of the Bill "ƒ believe that I have grounds under that", she said He told her, "I happen to know the sponsor of the Bill I have looked at the Bill and do not think that under it you have grounds. " He talked to the girl and put her in touch with people who could help her. Her pregnancy is now going through in the normal way. It does not follow that because women desire termination it will automatically be carried out. If we can manage to get a girl such as that into the hands of the medical profession, the Bill is succeeding in its objective.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Human Dignity: Reframing the Abortion Debate to Respect the Dignity of Choice and Life
    This is a repository copy of Protecting human dignity: reframing the abortion debate to respect the dignity of choice and life. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/99751/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Halliday, S (2016) Protecting human dignity: reframing the abortion debate to respect the dignity of choice and life. Contemporary Issues in Law, 13 (4). pp. 287-322. ISSN 1357-0374 This is the author-produced PDF of an article, accepted for publication in Contemporary Issues in Law, following peer review. The Version of Record Halliday, S (2016) Protecting human dignity: reframing the abortion debate to respect the dignity of choice and life is available in, Contemporary Issues in Law, 13 (4). pp. 287-322. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Page 1 of 30 Samantha Halliday, Associate Professor, University of Leeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Bodies, Our Choice: the Case for a Scottish Approach to Abortion
    OUR BODIES, OUR CHOICE: TH E CAS E FO RASCOTTIS H APPROAC H TO ABORTION CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2 2. WOMEN’S RIGHT TO ABORTION 4 3. ABORTION AND WOMEN’S INEQUALITY 7 4. SERVICES AND PRACTICE 20 5. DECRIMINALISATION 29 6. THE SCOTTISH CONTEXT 33 7. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 37 Acknowlegements and notes Many thanks to colleagues at Inclusion Scotland, the Coalition for Racial Equality and Rights, Scottish Refugee Council and the Equality Network for very helpful discussions about abortion care within the respective communities that they represent. All websites referenced were accessed between April and August 2016. 1 1. INTRODUCTION Women’s reproductive rights incorporate the right to bodily autonomy and integrity, to reproductive choice and healthcare, and to legal, safe abortion. Access to safe abortion is fundamental to women’s economic and social rights, to women’s autonomy, employment, education and access to resources, and therefore to women’s equality. Abortion is vital, routine healthcare that around one in three women will experience in her lifetime. 1 It is one of the safest and most frequent medical procedures used by women across the world, but laws and policies do not yet reflect this reality. 2 In Scotland, we have a publicly funded and delivered abortion care service. Nonetheless, women’s reproductive rights are currently undermined as a result of legal restrictions and service delivery issues that impede access to abortion. Women’s right to choose is still predicated on the legal authorisation of two doctors, without which both women and health practitioners are subject to prosecution under the 1967 Abortion Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion Law in Australia ISSN 1328-7478
    Department afthe ~ INFORMATION AND RESEARCH SERVICES Parliamentary Library ~>~~>~~~$:(l.l.!' Research Paper No.1 1998-99 Abortion Law in Australia ISSN 1328-7478 © Copyright Commonwealth ofAustralia 1999 Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent of the Department of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Senators and Members ofthe Australian Parliament in the course oftheir official duties. • This paper has been prepared for general distribution to Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament. While great care is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the paper is written using information publicly available at the time of production. The views expressed are those of the author and should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services (IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an official parliamentary or Australian government document. IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with members of the public. Published by the Department of the Parliamentary Library, 1999 INFORMATION AND RESEARCH SERVICES Research Paper No. 1 1998-99 " Abortion Law in Australia Natasha Cica Law and Bills Digest Group 31 August 1998 Acknowledgments v The author thanks the staff of the Law & Bills Digest Group for their assistance in preparing this paper, and particularly acknowledges the efforts of Ms Catherine Lorimer in locating research materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Termination of Pregnancy an RCN Nursing Framework
    Termination of Pregnancy An RCN nursing framework CLINICAL PROFESSIONAL RESOURCE TERMINATION OF PREGNANCY Acknowledgements Project Team This publication updates the RCN’s original publication Abortion Care: RCN Guidance for Nurses, Midwives and Specialist Community Public Health Nurses (2008), the production of which was led by Joanne Fletcher on behalf of the RCN’s Gynaecological Nurses’ Forum and other key stakeholders. This document was reviewed in 2013 and again in 2017 by the RCN Women’s Health Forum and was led by: Mandy Myers, Director of Operations, British Pregnancy Advisory Service Debby Holloway, Consultant Nurse, The McNair Centre, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust Publication This is an RCN practice guidance. Practice guidance are evidence-based consensus documents, used to guide decisions about appropriate care of an individual, family or population in a specific context. Description This guidance incorporates expert and evidence-based practice. It has been produced to support registered nurses and midwives working within the NHS and independent sectors. It considers the Abortion Act 1967 as amended by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 and is mainly related to the care of women undergoing termination of pregnancy under section 1(1)(a) of the Abortion Act 1967. Publication date: June 2017 Review date: June 2020 The Nine Quality Standards This publication has met the nine quality standards of the quality framework for RCN professional publications. For more information, or to request further details on how the nine quality standards have been met in relation to this particular professional publication, please contact [email protected] Evaluation The authors would value any feedback you have about this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion Act 1967 Is up to Date with All Changes Known to Be in Force on Or Before 29 April 2021
    Changes to legislation: Abortion Act 1967 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 29 April 2021. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) View outstanding changes Abortion Act 1967 1967 CHAPTER 87 E+W+S An Act to amend and clarify the law relating to termination of pregnancy by registered medical practitioners. [27th October 1967] Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Act: transfer of functions (1.7.1999) by S.I. 1999/672, art. 2, Sch. 1 C2 References to Minister of Health to be construed as references to Secretary of State: S.I. 1969/1688, arts. 2, 3, 5(4)(a) C3 Act modified (temp. 1.4.1991 to 30.4.1991) by S.I. 1991/480, art. 3(3)-(5) Commencement Information I1 Act wholly in force 27.4.1968 see s. 7(2) 1 Medical termination of pregnancy. E+W+S (1) Subject to the provisions of this section, a person shall not be guilty of an offence under the law relating to abortion when a pregnancy is terminated by a registered medical practitioner if two registered medical practitioners are of the opinion, formed in good faith— [F1(a) that the pregnancy has not exceeded its twenty-fourth week and that the continuance of the pregnancy would involve risk, greater than if the pregnancy were terminated, of injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman or any existing children of her family; or (b) that the termination is necessary to prevent grave permanent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman; or (c) that the continuance of the pregnancy would involve risk to the life of the pregnant woman, greater than if the pregnancy were terminated; or (d) that there is a substantial risk that if the child were born it would suffer from such physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicapped.] 2 Abortion Act 1967 (c.
    [Show full text]