Managed Forest Compartments
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Go Home Bay Summary Report
Eastern Georgian Bay Stewardship Council www.helpourfisheries.com Project Completion Report Go Home Bay (of Eastern Georgian Bay) Walleye Spawning Habitat Enhancement Project (2009-10 Canada-Ontario Agreement Project #3-06) October 2009 Go Home Bay Chutes (October 2009) 1 Go Home Bay Walleye Spawning Habitat Enhancement – Project Completion Report Go Home Bay Walleye Spawning Habitat Enhancement Project Executive Summary The Eastern Georgian Bay Stewardship Council (EGBSC) in partnership with the Ministry of Natural Resources through the Canada-Ontario Agreement (COA) Respecting the Great Lake Basin, have embarked on a program to reintroduce walleye into the Go Home Bay area of Georgian Bay. The successful completion of walleye spawning habitat enhancement work in October of 2009 represents completion of step #4 in a seven-step plan to re-introduce walleye into the Go Home Bay area of eastern Georgian Bay. The complete seven step process entails: 1. Pre-treatment assessment of the Go Home Bay walleye population. 2. Site characterization and evaluation of the Go Home Bay chutes walleye spawning site. 3. Design a site-specific, enhanced walleye spawning bed at Go Home Chutes 4. Enhance the Go Home Bay chutes spawning site 5. Rehabilitative walleye plantings for three – four years. 6. Conduct post-treatment assessment after the four-year stocking period. 7. Based on post-treatment assessment, consider the need for walleye harvest and fishing regulation revisions. This report relates specifically to walleye spawning bed enhancement work (Step 4) conducted at Go Home Chutes in October of 2009. 1.0 Project Goal: The over-all goal of this enhancement project was to contribute to towards the successful reintroduction of walleye to Go Home Bay with the intention of creating a natural, self-sustaining population. -
District of Muskoka Recreational Water Quality Model Review
DISTRICT OF MUSKOKA RECREATIONAL WATER QUALITY MODEL REVIEW TOWNSHIP OF MUSKOKA LAKES JUNE 16, 2016 RECREATIONAL WATER QUALITY MODEL REVIEW PRESENTATION FLOW • INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT • MODEL REVIEW: KEY FINDINGS • PLANNING IMPLICATIONS • NEXT STEPS • DISCUSSION AND QUESTIONS THE PROJECT: RECREATIONAL WATER QUALITY MODEL REVIEW KEY FINDINGS 1. MODEL IS NOT SUPPORTED ON AN INDIVIDUAL LAKE BASIS 2. ALL LAKES WARRANT PROTECTION, WITH MULTIPLE STRESSORS CONSIDERED 3. MOVE TOWARD RELIANCE ON MEASURED CHANGES AND OBSERVED WATER QUALITY - PHOSPHORUS IS STILL A GOOD INDICATOR 4. SEVEN “TRANSITIONAL” LAKES WARRANT ADDITIONAL STUDY “Phosphorus is the window into our lakes” RECREATIONAL WATER QUALITY MODEL REVIEW PLANNING IMPLICATIONS 5 MUSKOKA WATER QUALITY POLICIES Lake Classification Policy Requirement Implementation Over Threshold Lot Level Study High Sensitivity Lot Level Study SITE PLAN Moderate Sensitivity Site Plan Required Approach Current Policy Low Sensitivity Site Plan Recommended BMPs Standard Categories Implementation Vegetated Buffers X Shoreline Naturalization X Standard Protection Site Plan Required Soil Protection X On‐Site Stormwater Control X Transitional Lakes (7) Enhanced Protection Limit Impervious Surfaces X Enhanced Septic Setback (30m) X Lake Level Study Enhanced Lot Size X Direction Securities and Compliance Monitoring X • Simplified and consistent Proposed Policy • Leading-edge and defensible • Based on observable indicators • 20% of lakes impacted INTERIM COMMENTING • EXISTING POLICIES ARE OPEN TO CHALLENGE • ALSO CHALLENGES -
REPORT of the MASTER PLAN of ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ( of the Districf MUNICIPALITY of MUSKOKA and the WAHTA MOHAWKS
REPORT OF THE MASTER PLAN OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ( OF THE DISTRICf MUNICIPALITY OF MUSKOKA AND THE WAHTA MOHAWKS VOLUME 1 BACKGROUND RESEARCH ~...",.,.--_ ... .. .,~".~-"'''--- '- ( scale o 20 em ope Petroglyph Site (BeGu-4) Submitted to THE DISTRICf MUNICIPALITY OF MUSKOKA and THE WAHTA MOHAWKS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SERVICES INC. February 1994 REPORT OF THE MASTER PLAN OF HERITAGE RESOURCES OF THE DISTRICf MUNICIPALITY OF MUSKOKA AND THE WAHTA MOHAWKS VOLUME 1 BACKGROUND RESEARCH Submitted to THE DISTRICf MUNICIPALITY OF MUSKOKA and THE WAHTA MOHAWKS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SERVICES INC. 662 Bathurst St Toronto, Ontario M5S 2R3 in association with Unterman McPhail Cuming Associates Mount McGovern Co., Ltd. Dr. Carole Carpenter Ms. Susan L. Maltby, Conservator February, 1994 Project Personnel Project Director: Dr. Ronald F. Williamson' Research and Report Preparation: Dr. Carole H. Carpenter" Mr. Martin S. Cooper' Mr. David Cuming" Ms. Eva M. MacDonald1 Mr. Robert 1 MacDonald1 Ms. Barbara McPhail 2 Ms. Susan L Maltby" Mr. David A Robertson! Ms. Jean Simonton" Mr. Phillip J. Wright3 Report Editors: Mr. David A Robertson Dr. Ronald F. Williamson Project Information and Communication Co-Ordinators: Ms. Beverly J. Gamer' Ms. Eva M. Maclsonald! lArchaeological Services Inc. 2Unterman McPhail CumingAssociates 3Mount McGovern Co. Ltd. "Susan L. Maltby, Conservator sYork University ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many individuals have contnbuted to the collection and compilation of data for this study. It is only through their co-operation and generosity that this work was made possible. We would like to acknowledge the assistance of Mr. Ron Reid, of the Muskoka Heritage Areas Program, for providing detailed environmental data which has been generated as part ofthe Heritage Areas study; Ms. -
COUNCIL AGENDA Monday, May 13, 2019 1:00 Pm 99 Lone Pine Road, Port Severn Ontario
TOWNSHIP OF GEORGIAN BAY COUNCIL AGENDA Monday, May 13, 2019 1:00 pm 99 Lone Pine Road, Port Severn Ontario Page 1. Call to Order 1:00 p.m. or immediately following Council 2. Staff Award (a) Tony Van Dam RE: 30 Years of Federal Service (b) Doug Hupponen RE: 10 Years of Service 3. Declaration of Pecuniary Interest 4. Closed Session (a) WHEREAS, section 239(2) of the Municipal Act, 2001,as amended provides authority for Councils of Municipalities to close a meeting, or parts of a meeting, to the public if the subject matter pertains to a matter identified in Section 239(2); AND WHEREAS the Council of the Township of Georgian Bay deems it necessary to close this portion of the meeting in order to address matters under the following Sections of 239(2); a) Minutes of the April 8 and April 25 Closed Session Meetings b) Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board: RE: LPAT Appeal NOW BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Township of Georgian Bay moves into a Closed Session of Council at ______ a.m. Page 1 of 255 Page 5. Matters Arising From Closed Session (a) BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Township of Georgian Bay rise from Closed Session at ________ a.m. with / without a report. 6. Deputations (a) Pat Chow-Fraser and Mary Muter (1:00 p.m.) RE: Environmental Presentation 7. Consent Agenda (a) Adoption of Consent Agenda 5 - 9 (b) Minutes of April 8 Planning Council 10 - 16 (c) Minutes of April 8, 2019 Council meeting 17 - 18 (d) Minutes of April 9, 2019 Special Meeting of Council 19 - 22 (e) Minutes of April 9, 2019 Committee of the Whole Meeting 23 - 25 (f) Minutes of April 25, 2019 Special Meeting of Council 26 - 27 (g) Committee of the Whole Resolutions 28 - 56 (h) Administration Report 2019-06 RE: Parks Canada Community Consultation 57 - 83 (i) Financial Services Report 2019-16 RE: Financial Statement as of March 31, 2019 84 - 86 (j) Operations Report 2019-08 RE: RFP Results 87 - 96 (k) Operations Report 2019-10 RE: Honey Harbour Waterfront Plan Update 8.