Attachment 5
Exhibit C
Public Correspondence
Issue 1 (STEP Annual Report) • None received as of July 21, 2016 Issue 2 (RE Board Recruitment) • None received as of July 21, 2016 Issue 3 (RE Project Approval) • For all projects, except 15-037, none received as of July 21, 2016. • For project 15-037, a summary of received comments, comments, and staff responses are attached.
Attachment 5, Page 1 of 82 R&E project 15-037 Spring Creek Pond, Summary of Public Correspondence
Letters of Support from Organizations, Businesses, and Agencies 1. 6/20/2016, Brad Nye Deschutes Land Trust 2. 5/14/2016, Dough Hancock Friends of the Metolius 3. 4/21/2016, Wayne Chase Cold Springs Resort 4. 4/20/2016, Roger White Metolius Recreation Association (AKA Camp Sherman Chamber of Commerce) 5. 4/20/2106, Roger and Kathy Camp Sherman Store 6. 1/18/2016, & 3/18/2015, Robert McLean Owner, Cold Springs Resort 7. 1/21/2016, Kristie Miller, District Ranger US Forest Service 8. 12/29/2015, Charles Schillinsky International Federation of Fly Fishers, Oregon Co. 9. 12/22/2015, Lee Ann Ross Central Oregon Fly Fishers 10. 10/30/2015, Frank Turek Kokanee Karnival Youth Education Program
Letters of Support from Individuals 1. 5/18/2016, Robert Calson Resident/Landowner 2. 5/18/2016, Floyd Leithauser Resident/Landowner 3. 5/17/2016, Doug and Lorie Hancock Resident/Landowner 4. 5/17/2016, Maria Fuhrmann Member of Public 5. 5/17/2016, Christopher Dakan Resident/Landowner 6. 5/16/2016, Don Wilt Resident/Landowner 7. 5/16/2016, Pete and Magda Schay Resident/Landowner 8. 5/16/2106, Theresa Kempenich Member of Public 4/26/2016 & 1/28/2016, Philip Krohn Resident/Landowner 9. 1/13/2016 was in opposition 10. 4/22/2016, Shirley Ray Resident/Landowner 11. 4/21/2016 & 1/19/2016, Tom Tuchman US Forest Capital 12. 4/21/2106, Julie Edy Resident/Landowner 13. 4/21/2016, Jennie Sharp Member of Public 4/20/2016, Myrna Klupenger Resident/Landowner 14. 1/13/2016 was in opposition 15. 4/20/2016, Dick Kellogg Resident/Landowner 16. 4/20/2016, Kathryn Godsiff Member of Public 17. 1/18/2106, Judy Iott Resident/Landowner 18. 1/18/2106, Mary and Tim Johnson Resident/Landowner 19. 1/18/2106, Laura and Bob Lovitz Resident/Landowner 20. 1/18/2106, Meggins and Tom Tuchmann Resident/Landowner 21. 1/18/2106, Letty Morgan Resident/Landowner 22. 1/18/2106, Michelle and Tony Vinciguetta Resident/Landowner 23. 1/18/2016, Doug Phillips Resident/Landowner 24. 1/16/2016, Cliff Price Member of Public
Attachment 5, Page 2 of 82 R&E project 15-037 Spring Creek Pond, Summary of Public Correspondence Attachment 5
Letters of Opposition from Organization, Business, and Agency None Received
Letters of Opposition from Individuals 1. 6/14/2016, 4/22/2106 & 4/13/2016,Gary Gustafson Resident/Landowner 2. 4/22/2106, Carl Snyder Resident/Landowner 3. 4/21/2016, Sue Blanchard Resident/Landowner 4. 4/21/2106 & 4/15/2016, Glenda DeVorss Resident/Landowner 5. 4/15/2016, Bill & Coleen Swettman Resident/Landowner 6. 4/15/2106, Robert and Dee Swettman Resident/Landowner 7. 3/16/2016, Robert Sweet Resident/Landowner 8. 1/18/2016, William Morely Resident/Landowner 9. 1/18/2016, Eric and Arwen Gallenkamp Resident/Landowner 10. 1/13/2016, Bruce Livingston Resident/Landowner 11. 1/13/2016, 1/13/2016, Susan Koe Resident/Landowner 12. 1/13/2016, Katherine Livingston Resident/Landowner 13. 1/13/2016, Robert Millis Resident/Landowner 14. 1/13/2016, Samuel Morley Resident/Landowner 15. 1/13/2016, Shirley Ray Resident/Landowner 16. 1/13/2016, Matthew Voosanger Resident/Landowner
Attachment 5, Page 3 of 82 Alternate 5: As of 5/13/2016, this is the current conceptual site plan that will be refined based on continued feedback.
Parking Host site Path around Gate Fence Inlet Pipe pond Restroom Attachment 5, Page 4 of 82 Spring Creek Youth/Acclimation Pond and Education Site ODFW – Public Outreach Summary
2014 – Present: Agency outreach: Water Resources, State Historical Preservation Office, Department of State Lands, Department of Environmental Quality, Deschutes National Forest, Jefferson County, Salmon Trout Enhancement Program. Site visits and e-mail correspondence.
2014- Present: Deschutes Watershed Council, Central Oregon Flyfishers, Deschutes Land Trust, Trout Unlimited, International Federation of Flyfishers, email correspondence and site visit (December 15, 2015)
October 11, 2014: Met with Bruce Livingston (landowner to south), site visit and meeting with Brett Hodgson, Jen Luke, and Alan Dale
January 22, 2015: Meeting with Friends of Metolius (local stewardship group) in Camp Sherman. Presentation, discussions and site visit. 8-10 attendees
March 17, 2015: Public meeting at Camp Sherman Community Hall, press release in Camp Sherman, Bend, Redmond, Sisters area, e-mail notifications, 17 attendees
June 2015: Email notification regarding project with Metolius Forest Homeowner Association (MRFHA) board. No meeting was scheduled.
January 25, 2016: Following R&E meeting, met with neighbor, Phillip Krohn, on site to identify concerns and consider design alternatives.
April 18, 2016: Public meeting at Camp Sherman Community Hall, press release in Camp Sherman, Bend, Redmond, Sisters area, e-mail notifications, letters to adjacent landowners, 34 attendees. Summary of meeting is Sisters Nugget April 2016.
Email correspondence after April 18, 2016 meeting: Jen Luke followed up with all attendees asking for opinion of pond project. Out of 18 replies, most supported the project with conditions i.e. parking area moved to east of pond, vault toilet moved away from property boundary, water quality monitored etc. Seven individuals plus Camp Sherman Chamber of Commerce (11 members) support the project without conditions.
May 1 ,2016: Email correspondence with president of MRFHA. Summary of project in next MRFHA newsletter, July 2 meet TBA.
Attachment 5, Page 5 of 82 Public issue/concern ODFW response Not a public process See above. ODFW did not engage proper authorities ODFW has consulted with Water Resources Dept. (STEP water right exemption) Department of State Lands (wetlands avoidance), Dept. of Environmental Quality (water quality) and Jefferson County (zoning and development). Project has been designed or modified to meet requirements. ODFW should utilize property for This would effectively be maintaining the status quo and not meet educational uses only and all other use and ODFW’s goal of putting the property to its highest and best public access should remain as is. use. Maintains a private park exclusively for a group of neighbors. Use Wizard Falls Hatchery pond rather than This is not compatible with existing and future hatchery Spring Creek site for youth angling. operations. Wizard Falls production has increased. This coupled with the already high visitor use renders the site at capacity. Daily visitation by anglers to the abatement pond would result in conflict and safety issues for both staff and the public. Vault toilet should not be located near ODFW agrees. Vault toilet will be located near the center of the adjoining residence or property property in proximity to the pond. This will minimize impact to neighbors and be more user friendly. Trespass/excessive public use New fence will be constructed along the southern and western property boundaries. Locating the parking area near the existing residence and host site will provide better management, control of use and minimize the footprint on the majority of the property. Gate near the parking area will restrict access to foot traffic. Access will be closed 7 months of the year. Visitor use will be restricted to 8:00 AM – 6:00PM from May 1 – September 30. Parking in riparian area The parking area will be located near the current residence on the western side of the property well away from Spring Creek or other riparian areas. Existing gravel road will be gated and only used on occasion for buses and ADA. Wetlands Working with DSL to get a “No State Permit letter”. Pond has been sited and configured to avoid all wetlands. Inlet pipe will be horizontally bored to minimize disturbance to the meadow. Split rail fencing will limit public access to meadow wetlands and springs. Water quality Outlet will be designed to mitigate potential water quality impacts. ODFW will monitor water quality if discharge flows into receiving water. The project is being designed and ODFW will implement the project in two phases. Phase 1 will constructed too quickly. There will be no include pond excavation, piping inflow, partial fencing and planting. opportunity to make changes after Phase 2 will include parking area, host site, vault toilet, kiosk, construction. remainder of fencing and planting. Site will not be open to visitation until phase 2 is complete. This will provide sufficient time to meet construction schedule, and adaptively design and construct outlet to mitigate potential water quality and other issues. There is a formal process for disposition of ODFW has an obligation to make best use of property. If site use State property and ODFW is unlikely to ever does not support ODFW’s mission it becomes surplus, given nature make the property available to private of property it is unlikely to be sold to another state agency or development. Transfer the property to the affordable housing group. Disposal would be competitive and high Deschutes Basin Land Trust or set up a value of property will limit options (likely a developer or wealthy conservation easement individual). Sale or conservation easement to the Land Trust would require fair market value compensation. CE would still include pond project.
Attachment 5, Page 6 of 82 To protect and enhance Oregon's fish and wildlife and their habitats for use and enjoyment by present and future generations.
PROPOSAL FOR SPRING CREEK ACCLIMATION & YOUTH ANGLING POND CAMP SHERMAN, OREGON
March 2016
Oregon Department of Fish And Wildlife 61374 Parrell Road Bend, OR 97702-2625 541-388-6363
Contacts: Jennifer Luke, ODFW Brett Hodgson, ODFW
Attachment 5, Page 7 of 82
Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ...... 1 GENERAL SITE DESCRIPTION ...... 1 PROPOSED PROJECT AND OBJECTIVES ...... 1 Education and Interpretation ...... 2 Youth Angling ...... 2 Chinook Salmon Acclimation and Hatchboxes...... 3 WATER SOURCE ...... 3 ADDRESSED CONCERNS ...... 4 Trespass and Misuse ...... 4 Native Fish Management ...... 4 Water Quality ...... 4 Impact and on Fish and Wildlife ...... 4
POND AND PARKING DESIGN ...... 5 Pond ...... 5 Parking and Vehicles ...... 5 Volunteer Host Site ...... 5 Figure 1 Pond and Parking Design ...... 6
CONCLUSION ...... 5
Attachment 5, Page 8 of 82 INTRODUCTION
The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) proposes development on a 15 acre parcel in Camp Sherman to provide a multi-use facility at the former Metolius Hatchery site. Project features include a spring fed pond to provide a youth angling opportunity during summer and salmon hatchboxes/smolt acclimation during late winter and early spring. The site would also facilitate education opportunities for all ages to learn about the Metolius River watershed, stream and pond ecology, salmon and trout biology, and anadromous fish reintroduction.
ODFW Bend staff have reached out to adjacent landowners and other community members to gather input and support for the project. ODFW has utilized the input to address concerns and suggestions in refining the current project design and operational plan. Environmental impact and footprint of this development on the Metolius watershed and its fish and wildlife will be minimal. While the Metolius River is the primary water feature in the area, numerous private ponds are scattered throughout the Camp Sherman area. In keeping with the aesthetic character and ecological integrity of Camp Sherman and the surrounding Metolius River only native shrubs, grasses, and trees will be planted. The utilization of this site for youth angling, environmental education, and salmon restoration and enhancement will be an asset to the local community and surrounding area.
GENERAL SITE DESCRIPTION
The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife’s former Metolius Hatchery property is located in the Camp Sherman area on Spring Creek, a tributary of the upper Metolius River. The Oregon Fish Commission constructed the Metolius Hatchery in 1947 and the hatchery closed in 1967.
The property encompasses 15 acres of meadow, ponderosa pine, riparian area and 0.4 miles of Spring Creek stream frontage. The property is zoned rural residential by Jefferson County. There is currently one house on site occupied by a Wizard Falls Hatchery staff.
The property is used by ODFW’s Salmon-Trout Enhancement Program to conduct youth education programs. Several local classes visit the site and conduct stream and fisheries investigations. The students sample aquatic macroinvertebrates, test water quality and observe bull trout and kokanee salmon spawning.
PROPOSED PROJECT AND OBJECTIVES
The proposed plan for the Spring Creek hatchery site is to utilize a portion of the 15 acre parcel to develop a pond and facilities for education, interpretive, and recreation uses thereby contributing to raising awareness of Oregon’s aquatic resources and environment.
1
Attachment 5, Page 9 of 82 Project facilities will provide added benefit to the public and school groups who utilize the site for recreational and educational activities and would facilitate ODFW’s management of the site.
Proposed facilities include a half acre pond, a gravel parking area for 20 vehicles, ADA parking space, picnic tables, informational kiosk, a single vault toilet, and perimeter and parking area fencing.
The pond and picnic area will be open to the public seasonally, from the end of May (stream opener) to September 30 for fishing. Access and angling hours shall be 8:00 am to 7:00 pm. ODFW volunteer hosts will be available to deter any abuse of angling hours and misuse of the property. The site will be managed by ODFW staff and volunteers. To minimize disturbance to wildlife and protect the ecological integrity of the site, public access will be restricted during the balance of the year.
Education and Interpretation While the site currently provides a venue for riverine aquatic and fisheries education programs, the cornerstone of the upgraded site will be the construction of a small pond to provide onsite access to both still waters and wetlands. This pond will complement the other onsite waters and provide a wider range of habitats and opportunities that can be experienced by students and participants in STEP education events. This will be a versatile and easy to access location.
This property will continue to be the site of STEP’s Kokanee Karnival Youth Education Program however activities would be expanded to hands-on programs about the anadromous fish reintroduction, native trout habitat, wetlands, pond habitat and recreational angling. Egg hatchboxes and salmon acclimation would be a part of the STEP education activities.
Eventually as the infrastructure is completed, information kiosks and interpretive signage will be developed to passively educate the public of the local watershed and aquatic resources.
Youth Angling Many anglers visit the Metolius River throughout the year. Angling on the Metolius River is restricted to fly-fishing only, catch and release. While the fly-fishing only regulation and challenging conditions draw many fly-fisherman to the Metolius, due to its physical setting, it is difficult for a child or disabled angler to catch fish in the Metolius River.
The pond will create a youth 17 and under outdoor recreation opportunity. A stocked rainbow trout fishery will provide an easy place, and a natural and aesthetic setting for kids to learn how to fish and improve their fishing skills. ODFW staff will develop fishing regulations for the site appropriate for the desired use. This may include fly-fishing or other restricted methods of angling. A wheelchair accessible path to pond will provide fishing access.
2
Attachment 5, Page 10 of 82 ODFW and other interested parties will host youth angling clinics and outdoor classes at the pond. Fishing classes for adults will be considered by reservation only. The main objective is get children excited about fishing and being outdoors by teaching them how to fish, connecting them to the resources, and supporting development of their interests. The pond will be open to youth angling approximately 4.5 months, from the May stream opener to September 30th.
Chinook Acclimation and Hatchboxes The pond and spring will be utilized for chinook and sockeye salmon acclimation and egg hatchboxes as part of the anadromous salmon reintroduction above the Pelton-Round Butte Dam complex. The Reintroduction and Conservation Plan for Anadromous Fish In the Upper Deschutes River Sub-basin identifies smolt acclimation and egg hatchboxes as potential methods to enhance anadromous salmon populations upstream of the Pelton-Round Butte Dam complex. This additional use of the pond and water source will not only provide a conservation benefit, but equally important it will provide an opportunity for volunteers and school groups to get involved in conservation efforts. Hatchboxes are a great tool to engage the community while educating and informing them of the value of Oregon’s aquatic resources. Hatchboxes will incubate Chinook and/or sockeye eggs from September through February. Fry will be released on site.
Chinook and sockeye smolts exposed to spring fed pond would acclimate to the Metolius River Basin. Winter pre-smolts would be transferred from Wizard Falls Hatchery to the pond where they will be held in net pens for several months prior to release. Studies have demonstrated that this brief exposure to localized water can greatly increase the ability of adult fish to return to the natal release site. Acclimation of Chinook or sockeye smolts in net pens would occur for 2-4 months, from January to early May, prior to the pond opening for angling. ODFW biologists, Wizard Fall's hatchery staff and volunteers will monitor and tend to Chinook smolts and determine release. After the acclimation period, smolts will be netted and transported to nearby Spring Creek which borders the ODFW property.
WATER SOURCE FOR POND
Water for the pond will originate from a large spring on the property which flows approximately 2.8 cfs. It is estimated that a maximum of 0.5 cfs needs to be withdrawn in order to keep the pond at full pool. Underground pipe would transport the water from the spring to pond. Hatchboxes would be placed near the inlet of the pond. The outlet would return water to a “bioswale” near the pond and water would permeate the soil and provide an artificial wetland area.
3
Attachment 5, Page 11 of 82 ADDRESSED CONCERNS
Trespass and Misuse To prevent trespass and misuse of the pond and property, ODFW volunteer hosts would be available to monitor the site, this should impede trespass and abuse. Furthermore, the house on the property will be occupied by Wizard Falls Hatchery staff. ODFW reserves the right to close the site and pond if overuse and trespass of property become unmanageable, but we do not anticipate this to happen. Trespass and misuse of adjacent property will be deterred with signage and perimeter fencing. Split rail fencing will be constructed along the southern property boundary as well as the parking area. All fencing will meet wildlife friendly specifications. A gate will restrict vehicles to the parking area and visitors can access the pond by walking or ADA approved path. The foot path to the pond will be approximately 200 feet.
Native Fish Management To address concerns of hatchery fish escapement into the Metolius basin, the pond outlet will not connect to the spring or creek. Outlet water will permeate the adjacent meadow via bioswale or wetland area. For acclimation purposes, an outlet may be designed in the future for volitional smolt releases. This outlet would be open for 2-3 weeks in April and would allow smolts to leave based on development and temperature cues. All rainbow trout would be removed before acclimation. Only triploid (sterile) rainbow trout will be stocked in the pond for youth angling.
Water Quality Water leaving the pond will permeate through a bioswale adjacent to the pond. Any water returning to Spring Creek or the spring will be filtered through the bioswale and small wetland. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife consulted with Department of Environmental Quality and determined that permeating water to the ground will have little to no impact to water quality in Spring Creek or spring. It is anticipated that less than half a cubic foot per second will leave the pond at full pool and full flow.
Impact on Fish and Wildlife The development and utilization of this small, half acre pond is unlikely to affect wildlife habitat, migration or populations. The property is bordered on two sides by developed home sites on small acreages. Wildlife habitat enhancement will occur through removal of invasive plant species and planting and maintaining native shrubs, grasses and trees. A wildlife-friendly, wood rail fence will be built on south perimeter. Chinook and sockeye acclimation may boost survival of reintroduced salmon in the Metolius watershed.
4
Attachment 5, Page 12 of 82 POND AND PARKING DESIGN (Figure 1)
Pond Placement of the half acre pond will be near center of property toward the east part of the meadow, adjacent to ponderosa pine trees. The shape of the pond will depend on the final plans for inlet and outlet, but will have an irregular contour. An informational kiosk and 4-5 picnic tables will be placed amongst the pine trees to the east of the pond. High quality natural woods will be utilized to fabricate highly aesthetic and functional facilities.
Parking and Vehicles Parking for 15-20 vehicles will be located at the entrance of the property in the northwest corner. The parking area will be gravel and bordered by a wood rail fence. An ADA parking space will be placed at the parking area and an ADA approved path will lead to the pond. A gate will prevent vehicular traffic beyond the parking area with the exception of vehicles with ADA persons, special events and bus turnaround. The single vault toilet will be located adjacent to the parking area in the northwest corner of the property.
Volunteer Host Site The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife places volunteers with recreation vehicles or trailers at fish hatcheries, wildlife areas and field offices throughout the state. In exchange for hook up utilities and a site to park, volunteers work approximately 40 hours a week at the site. A volunteer RV host site would be placed near the entrance at the west end of the property. Volunteers will be at the site from May to October each year. Volunteer responsibilities would include overseeing use of the pond and general maintenance on the property.
CONCLUSION
The Oregon Department and Fish & Wildlife is committed to utilizing the Spring Creek property strictly for salmon enhancement, environmental education and youth angling. Fishing is time with family and friends, a time to be outdoors, and a healthy activity. Fishing fosters understanding, respect, and stewardship of the natural environment. Education programs at ODFW’s Spring Creek property will not only teach people about angling, but also about responsible stewardship of our natural environment. Salmon smolt acclimation and egg hatch boxes will boost production and survival of salmon in the basin, but just as important, they will be used as hands-on teaching tools for people to learn about fish that were historically a natural part of the environment.
The Oregon Department of Fish &Wildlife intends to maintain the property at Spring Creek for these purposes. The impact and footprint of a small pond, gravel parking area, and single vault toilet will be minimal. Large crowds of people are not anticipated and there will be little, if any, damage to the ecosystem. Angling in the pond will be open for approximately four months each year and closed to public use from October 1 to the third weekend in May.
5
Attachment 5, Page 13 of 82 Letters of Support from Organizations, Businesses, and Agencies
Attachment 5, Page 14 of 82 From: ODFW Info To: Kevin Herkamp Subject: FW: ODFW Youth Angling Pond in Camp Sherman Date: Monday, June 20, 2016 8:13:52 AM
From: Brad Nye [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 5:43 PM To: Gary Gustafson
Gary,
I’m chiming in here to clarify the Deschutes Land Trust’s potential role in this project.
We’ve been aware of this project for several years, primarily because we hold a conservation easement (Spring Creek Conservation Easement) on 25 acres immediately to the south of the ODFW hatchery property. We have had no direct involvement in development of the pond proposal, but our stewardship staff have tracked ODFW’s public process to assess the potential impacts of the project on the Spring Creek Conservation Easement. Our chief concern has been ensuring that the pond project not increase trespass onto the conservation easement. In this context, ODFW, the Land Trust, and the conservation easement landowners have discussed establishing a clearer boundary between the two properties, including new fencing and signing.
A few months ago, Doug Hancock invited me to a small meeting with ODFW and neighboring landowners. Doug proposed the idea of the Land Trust holding a conservation easement on the property, and I told the group we would consider it. Following that meeting, ODFW asked Doug to prepare a conservation easement proposal for ODFW’s consideration. I supplied natural resource and historic information for the proposal, and made some suggestions regarding the purposes/scope of a potential conservation easement.
Doug submitted the conservation easement proposal to ODFW on March 9. I think it’s important to clarify that the conservation easement proposal Doug put together included the fishing pond as an integral component:
[T]he proposal brings the community of Camp Sherman and ODFW together to support mutual goals of protecting the Property’s ecological integrity while allowing relatively low-impact uses like the youth fishing pond and salmon acclimation pond. This collaboration and shared investment gives ODFW’s pond proposal a greater chance of long-term success, and value as an education and natural resource.
Attachment 5, Page 15 of 82 Your letter to Governor Brown states that the Land Trust “is now interested in entering into discussions that could lead to acquisition of the ODFW property on the north side of Spring Creek,” and may inadvertently create the impression that the Land Trust’s view of the project has changed since March 9 when Doug Hancock submitted his conservation easement proposal. I want to assure all involved that our position has not changed, and that we have no specific acquisition objectives relating to the ODFW’s hatchery property – conservation easement, fee title, or otherwise. The Land Trust’s position has been and will continue to be that, if asked, we will entertain a collective conservation proposal from ODFW and the Camp Sherman community. We will consider such a proposal irrespective of whether it includes a fishing pond, a conservation easement, educational use, or any other specific component.
Thanks,
Brad Nye Conservation Director Deschutes Land Trust 210 NW Irving Avenue, Suite 102 Bend, Oregon 97703 541 330 0017 deschuteslandtrust.org
On Jun 14, 2016, at 3:42 PM, Gary Gustafson
Legislators, agencies and individuals,
I attach a copy of a letter sent to Governor Brown concerning a proposal by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) to develop a large youth fishing pond on 15 acres they own and manage in Camp Sherman. This pond would be funded through a $200k+ grant from the Oregon Restoration and Enhancement Board. The R&E Board has already approved it and the next step is consideration by the Fish and Wildlife Commission.
While no one should argue with affording the youth of our state another opportunity to fish, in my opinion this proposal has many fatal flaws. It's simply in the wrong location, duplicates an existing pond in Camp Sherman already used for youth angling, could threaten the quality of local water sources and will require annual ODFW maintenance funding outside of the grant request (at a time when the agency is very budget constrained). In addition, it appears inconsistent with the USFS Metolius Wild and Scenic River Management Plan and the purpose of the recently enacted Metolius Area of Critical State Concern.
I request that this R&E grant request proposal be suspended for at least one year - to afford an opportunity for a negotiated long-term solution satisfactory to all parties. This is a good opportunity for the Governor's Office, DLCD or other entity to take the lead and sponsor new discussions between ODFW, the Deschutes Land Trust and the Friends of the Metolius, whereby ODFW could be
Attachment 5, Page 16 of 82 compensated and most or all of this property could receive long-term protection and continue to be used for public educational purposes. I have been in contact with the Deschutes Land Trust and they are interested and prepared to participate in this process.
Please let me know if I may provide further clarification. Thank you.
Gary "Gus" Gustafson Camp Sherman 541-595-1115
Attachment 5, Page 17 of 82 Friends of the Metolius
Dedicated to protecting the legacy dy tbe natural resources of the Metolius Basin
By email to [email protected] May 14,2016 Kevin Hercamp R&E Coordinator Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife
Re: Proposal for Spring Creek Acclimation & Youth Angling Pond Camp Sherman, Oregon
Dear Kevin,
I am writing this letter in order to make sure that the position of Friends of the Metolius regarding the proposed youth angling pond in Camp Sherman is clear. Please share this letter with ODFW's Recreation and Enhancement Board as it considers the project.
FOM is a conservation group that is dedicated to protecting the Metolius basin (www.rnetoliusfriends.olg). Our position on the pond project has been consistent from the start and we believe that we have articulated it clearly. However, there may be some misunderstanding and/or inaccurate information regarding FOM's position and for that reason we want to provide this brief summary. The central issue for FOM has been one of balance: the possible detrimental impacts of the pond as proposed by ODFW on the one hand, versus the possible detrimental impact of sale of the property into private ownership with subsequent development on the other.
For FOM there is no question that continued ownership of the property by a state agency, ODFW, is greatly preferred. By putting the property to beneficial public use with the youth angltng/acclimation pond, the issue of sale of the property is, we trust, eliminated. On this basis FOM does not oppose the project and believes that the plans for the properly define an appropriate beneficial use ofthe property.
ODFW has worked constructively on the design and management aspects of the project and ODFW staff have been very responsive to legitimate concerns that have been raised. We anticipate that the agency will continue to be responsive to concerns and make adjustments to operations of the facility to address concerns and to minimize negative impacts. We consider ongoing management to be a work in process and ask that ODFW be very proactive in responding to community concerns.
Sincerely,
Doug
cc, by email: [email protected] Jennifer Luke, ODFW Brett Hodgson, ODFW Chip Dale, ODFW
Friends of the Metolius . PO Box 101 . Camp Sherman, OR97730 | www.metoliusfriends.orgAttachment 5, Page 18 of 82 Attachment 5, Page 19 of 82 Attachment 5, Page 20 of 82 Attachment 5, Page 21 of 82 Kevin Herkamp
From: Cold Springs Resort
January 18th, 2016
To Whom It May Concern,
I just wanted to make sure that Cold Springs Resort, located adjacent to the proposed youth angling and salmon pond, had a letter of support on file.
This is an exciting opportunity to give back to the future of our angling youth and provide them with an incredibly scenic and positive fishing experience. Which in turn provides future revenue in fishing licenses AND educates our youth in stewardship of the land. It would also provide and promote an area for our youth to get out with nature and have something else to do other then play their electronics or sit in front of the TV while visiting this area. It really feeds into what the Camp Sherman area is all about. Nature, wildlife, hiking, biking, fly fishing and exploring the natural surroundings. The peace and quite.
The state has an opportunity to really give back and provide a facility to the people, a place to come and share and create a tradition amongst families. "I came here as a kid and learned how to fish right here, where we are now"!
To see this area sold to a developer and homes put in would be a crying shame to what "could have been".
We have no issues as a neighbor to help maintain the area by cleaning up if needed as needed or providing the work required to build a trail to and from our property. We welcome it.
Thank you fro taking the time to review this letter of support and we look forward to a successful outcome to move forward with this project.
Sincerely,
Robert Mclean Owner Cold Springs Resort.
1 Attachment 5, Page 22 of 82 Kevin Herkamp
From: Jennifer Luke
Hey Kevin,
Cold Springs Resort, landowners to the NE, plan on sending a letter of support today.
Below is a March email from Robert, a Camp Sherman resident, that works at the resort.
Jen
From: Cold Springs Resort [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 8:26 AM To: Jennifer Luke Subject: Re: ODFW plans new youth fishing pond on Spring Creek property
Good morning Jen, This is Robert here with Cold Springs Resort. I just wanted to let you know that it was nice meeting you and thank you for putting on a good informative meeting. We are fully behind you guys and feel that it is a wonderful use for the location... Anything we can do to help you out with this endeavor, please feel free to let me know. I can also be reached via cell at 480‐8218.
Best,
Sent from Robert's iPhone
On Mar 10, 2015, at 11:23 AM, Jennifer Luke
Hello, ODFW is having a public meeting regarding a pond proposal for a kids fishing pond in Camp Sherman. Would like to hear your input. Let me know if you have any questions,
Jen Luke, ODFW
NEWS RELEASE Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife
Contact: Jen Luke (541) 633‐1113
March 9, 2015
ODFW plans new youth fishing pond on Spring Creek property
BEND, Ore. – An abandoned hatchery site near Camp Sherman could find new life providing youth fishing opportunities under a plan being proposed by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
1 Attachment 5, Page 23 of 82 Attachment 5, Page 24 of 82 Attachment 5, Page 25 of 82 Attachment 5, Page 26 of 82 Attachment 5, Page 27 of 82 Attachment 5, Page 28 of 82 Letters of Support from Individuals
Attachment 5, Page 29 of 82 Kevin Herkamp
From: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 5:06 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Camp Sherman Pond
Dear Sirs, As a part time resident of Camp Sherman,I am writing in support of the Youth Fishing Pond at the old hatchery site.You are well aware of the tremendous response to the fishing day at the Wizard Falls Hatchery, which draws hundreds of young anglers. As a grandparent who has tried to find fishing sites for young children, I can attest to the need for such a place in this area. In addition, the acclimatization of young salmon smolts and a place for educational activities make the plan very desirable. Robert B. Calson
1 Attachment 5, Page 30 of 82 Kevin Herkamp
From: Floyd Leithauser
------Forwarded message ------From: Floyd Leithauser
My wife and I are in favor of a youth fishing pond which Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife is considering for construction at the old fish hatchery site in Camp Sherman. We feel that future fishing and the future fishermen (women) should learn the skills and good habits around the same area as current fishing is taking place. Way to often does a "first Fish" get caught in a plastic pool at a boat show.
Thanks for your consideration, Floyd Leithauser
1 Attachment 5, Page 31 of 82 Doug and Lorie Hancock P,O. Box 146 Camp Sherman, Oregon 97730
By email to [email protected] May 17,2016 Kevin Herkamp R&E Coordinator Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife
Re: Proposal for Spring Creek Acclimation & Youth Angling Pond Camp Sherman, Oregon
Dear Kevin,
We are writing this letter in to let you know that many in the Camp Sherman community are in favor of the proposed youth angling pond in Camp Sherman. We would like you to let the Recreation and Enhancement Board know that this project has a lot of community support, although as is often the case the voices of the silent majority may be drowned out in the banter of objectors.
We have followed closely in the planning of the project, have attended all community meetings, have talked to neighbors, and are convinced that continued ownership ofthe property by a state agency is greatly preferred to the possible alternative, namely, sale of the property for possible development. We have lived in Camp Sherman for about 20 years and are convinced that ODFW would manage the pond with best management practices to minimize impact on the environment, and the neighbors. And from our perspective, kids could certainly use a family-friendly facility like this to excellent ends.
It is important to note that the properly is not a wilderness and is not a pristine haven in the middle of nowhere. It is l5 very nice acres in a very nice setting that used to be a dairy farm, used to be a hatchery, and which is now located between a residential community and some long time neighbors. ODFW has worked constructively on the design and management aspects of the project and ODFW staff have been very responsive to legitimate concerns that have been raised. We anticipate that the agency will continue to be responsive to concerns and make adjustments to operations of the facility to address concerns and to minimize negative impacts,
We hope that (a) ODFW does not sell the property to private interests, and (b) by using the properly as an acclimation and youth angling pond the risk of sale into private ownership will be eliminated. It has been suggested that in conjunction with the establishment of the pond, ODFW agree to grant a conservation easement for the properfy to Deschutes Land Trust in exchange for a fund to cover future maintenance of the pond project or some other financial consideration. We strongly support the proposal for a conservation easement as it would protect this property for future generations.
ancock. Lorie Hancock
Attachment 5, Page 32 of 82 Kevin Herkamp
From: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 7:37 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Fishing Pond for Kids
Hello, I heard that the creation of a fishing pond for kids might be in the works, and I just wanted to add my two cents ‐ it would be a wonderful addition to the area! Thanks for considering it!
Maria Fuhrmann
Sent from Windows Mail
1 Attachment 5, Page 33 of 82 Kevin Herkamp
From: Christopher Dakan
Attn: Kevin Herkamp Hello Kevin
I heartily support the proposed use of the ODF&W Old Fish Hatchery site as a youth fishing pond and educational site. This would be a great use of public property allowing public access, a place for our kids to learn about and love fishing, educational opportunities, and increased accommodation for migrating salmon, all in the public interest.
I see this proposal as a unique opportunity to make use of this under utilized and currently inaccessible propery for the enjoyment of all.
Thank you, Chris Dakan Part time resident
1 Attachment 5, Page 34 of 82 Kevin Herkamp
From: Don Wilt
We are long‐time residents of Camp Sherman who are actively involved in a number of local community endeavors including the Camp Sherman Historical Society, the Camp Sherman Community Hall, the Camp Sherman waste transfer volunteers, and the USFS / Friends of Metolius forest trails maintenance support group.
We are writing to say we favor the proposal to create a youth fishing facility on the site of the old Metolius / Spring Creek fish hatchery. We think this will be a good use of the property and an asset to all Oregonians.
Thank you for the opportunity to express our support for this exciting proposal. If there is any need to contact us, we can be reached at 541‐595‐6749.
Don and Priscilla Wilt PO Box 125 Camp Sherman, OR 97730
1 Attachment 5, Page 35 of 82 Kevin Herkamp
From: Magda and Pete Schay
Dear Mr. Herkamp, As long time Camp Sherman people we fully support the proposed pond and outdoor educational facility at the underutilized ODF&W property - the Old Hatchery site in Camp Sherman. For years this unique parcel has been used sporadically by Central Oregon schools and ODF&W has sponsored the Kokanee Karnival for a few years now, but so much more can be done with this valuable site. This is it! Let's fund it and move on. The public will greatly benefit and so will ODF&W.
Pete and Magda Schay
1 Attachment 5, Page 36 of 82 Kevin Herkamp
From: Theresa Kempenich
Dear Kevin,
I highly support the development of the Old Fish Hatchery site as a fishing pond for children, outdoor education site and chinook salmon acclimatization site. I fly fish on the Metolius and have a get away cabin in Camp Sherman. This development is really needed in this area, since there are no other easily accessible sure bet fishing opportunities for children. I am trying to ingrain an appreciation for nature and fishing in my young niece and nephews and would make good use of this site, as would many visitors to the surrounding area. We could fish with them on the Metolius or Wychus Creek, but the likelihood of a hookup on these streams is pretty bleak, even for adults, and I fear they would lose interest quickly.
This development would be a nice adjunct to the fish hatchery, could get kids really excited and create future generations of fishing and wilderness enthusiasts.
Thank you for your efforts in this regard.
Sincerely, Theresa Kempenich 117 SW Bancroft St. Portland, OR 97239
Sent from my iPad
1 Attachment 5, Page 37 of 82 Kevin Herkamp
Subject: FW: Monday's meeting - Spring Creek Acclimation and Youth Angling Pond
From: Philip Krohn [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 10:36 AM To: Jennifer Luke Cc: Brett Hodgson Subject: Re: Monday's meeting - Spring Creek Acclimation and Youth Angling Pond
Hello Jen,
Thanks for putting together the meeting. This has been a long process for you and I can imagine it is challenging to maintain momentum while addressing disparate vantage points and concerns.
In an ideal world we would like to see the property conserved as wildlife habitat and maintained as an undeveloped educational resource. There were many concerns that came up at the meeting regarding management of water, public use and trespass that give pause to the pond plan. At the same time this proposal is being advanced against the backdrop of a threatened sale of the property into private hands. We don’t want to see that happen.
I think you and Brett have been enormously receptive in looking at opportunities to emphasize protection of the site’s habitat values by designing a plan that minimizes the impacts of human activity. I do see this as a balanced outcome. I hope that the concerns of your NW neighbor can be addressed without compromising the integrity of the gating and parking plan which is definitely the key to maintaining-as you say-the aesthetic and habitat attributes of the property.
All the best, -Philip Krohn
(on behalf of my partner Katherine Armer and our cabin co-owners Susan Koe family and Robert Millis family)
On Apr 20, 2016, at 1:35 PM, Jennifer Luke
Hello and thank you to all who attended Monday’s meeting,
Some of you traveled quite a distance and we appreciate your effort to show up for the meeting. And thank you for your interest and taking the time to share your input.
We will continue to adaptively modify the project design and operation in attempt to meet ODFW goals and objectives, address community concerns and maintain the aesthetic and habitat attributes of the property. Some minor modifications to the footprint plan and site management will be made based on
1 Attachment 5, Page 38 of 82 Attachment 5, Page 39 of 82 Attachment 5, Page 40 of 82 Kevin Herkamp
From: julie edy
Kevin,
My name is Julie Edy. My husband and I own the property designated 1310 which is adjacent to the proposed fishing pond in Camp Sherman. We attended the meeting held in Camp Sherman on April 18th to learn what ODFW was proposing to do with its old fish hatchery site.
Obviously what we as adjacent landowners would like is for the land to stay as it is now but I realize that is most likely impossible and that perhaps the proposed fishing pond is the most acceptable use of the property.
I understand that the original concept had the parking lot further to the east in the pine trees and that many at the meeting were upset that it had been moved to the western edge of the area. While this places it closer to our residence, I agree with the second placement. I would rather watch people walk to the pond than have the noise and dust of vehicles driving past to reach a parking lot.
There were several suggestions made at the meeting that I hope you will consider. The first would be to please move the vault toilet further east and closer to the pond. When a small child says he/she needs to use the restroom that usually means NOW and not after a long walk back to the car.
Another good suggestion was to have a gate to the west of the parking lot to keep cars from using the lot even when the fishing pond is closed.
This brings up the subject of hours of operation. I agree with the argument made at the meeting that to have the pond open for fishing from dawn to dusk when the onsite host need only be there 40 hours per week is not acceptable. In fact, dawn to dusk seems too long for adjacent landowners even if you had a host available the entire time. Even happy chatter would not be appreciated early in the morning through an open window.
In closing I would like to commend Jennifer Luke for having grace under pressure at the Camp Sherman meeting. I'm guessing she was not expecting such a "vocal" crowd.
Thank you,
Julie Edy
1 Attachment 5, Page 41 of 82 Attachment 5, Page 42 of 82 Attachment 5, Page 43 of 82 Attachment 5, Page 44 of 82 Attachment 5, Page 45 of 82 Attachment 5, Page 46 of 82 From: Brett Hodgson To: kevin.herkamp Cc: Jennifer Luke; Alan Dale Subject: FW: Spring Creek Date: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 4:25:42 PM
-----Original Message----- From: Philip Krohn [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 7:03 PM To: [email protected]; Jennifer Luke Subject: Spring Creek
Hi Jen and Brett, Thanks again for making the trek out to Camp Sherman on Monday. I appreciated the opportunity to walk the ODFW property with you. And I particularly appreciate your receptivity to ideas about making this pond feature a net benefit as quality habitat both through structural native vegetation and by keeping cars on the other side of the spring. Everyone I talk to about these aspects seems extremely encouraged, even thrilled.
In the near term I will try to gather a few names and emails of interested folks that may not be on your list but who may want to come to a meeting. I am hoping that meeting can not be on Sat the 16th of April--that's the only Weekend in March or April that I could not attend.
I will also talk to various of the other more invested folks (Bruce Livingston, Doug Hancock, Roger White, Frank Turek, Shirley Ray) and see how close we are in matching up our visions---I feel confident in a positive connect. I am most worried about the Tuchman cabin access issue. Right now they use Cold Springs and a tiny corner of the ODFW property and that looks good. Giving them year round access across the entire property would definitely mess up the wonderful vision of keeping the pond area and beyond to Sp Creek foot travel quality habitat. It would be a huge and I think inappropriate private entitlement across the middle of a project that is being thoughtfully designed for optimum public use while optimizing it's wildlife values.
I hope your week in Eugene wasn't too grueling. Best, -Philip
Attachment 5, Page 47 of 82 Kevin Herkamp
From: Tom Tuchmann
Kevin:
I wanted to pass along our letter of support. Thanks
Best, Tom
US Forest Capital, LLC phone‐(503) 220‐8103 facsimile‐(503) 220‐0056 email‐[email protected] www.usforestcapital.com
------NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: This e‐mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the recipients to whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged and/or confidential. If you received this e‐mail in error, any review, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. Please notify us immediately of the error by return e‐mail and please delete this message from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Tom Tuchmann
Dear Brett and Jennifer:
Pleas see attached our letter in support of the Spring Creek Youth Angling Pond.
Best, Tom Tuchmann
US Forest Capital, LLC phone‐(503) 220‐8103 facsimile‐(503) 220‐0056
1 Attachment 5, Page 48 of 82 Tract E, Lot 1 12532 SW River Road Camp Sherman OR
January 18, 2016
Mr. Curt Melcher, Director Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 4034 Fairview Industrial Drive SE Salem, OR 97302
RE: Spring Creek Youth Angling Pond
Dear Mr. Melcher:
We are writing in support of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife’s (ODF&W) Spring Creek Youth Angling Pond that is being proposed for the old hatchery site in Camp Sherman.
In addition to the youth angling and associated outdoor education benefits that we support, two additional environmental benefits will also be created. First, the proposed Pond provides a great alternative to an ODF&W property sale that would likely result in development under current zoning in a manner that will degrade the open space and wildlife habitat characteristics of the property. Second, the pond access road will provide alternative access to our cabin that will, therefore, allow us to remove our bridge across the Metolius. We understand that this bridge removal is one of the Forest Service’s Wild and Scenic River management plan objectives for the area.
Thanks you for your consideration and we look forward to working with the Department on this important and worthwhile project.
Sincerely,
Judy Iott Mary and Tim Johnson Laura Meand Bob Lovitz Letty Morgan Meggins and Tom Tuchmann Michelle and Tony Vinciguerra
Attachment 5, Page 49 of 82 Kevin Herkamp
From: Doug Phillips
As A long time Camp Sherman resident, I would like to see the fishing pond project to be approved.
Doug Phillips Camp Sherman, Oregon
1 Attachment 5, Page 50 of 82 Kevin Herkamp
From: Cliff Price
I am a member of Central Oregon Flyfishers and a volunteer Angler Education Instructor in Central Oregon. I am writing to support the proposal for a Youth Angling / Salmon Acclimation Pond to be constructed at Camp Sherman. The pond would provide much needed new opportunities for young anglers in the area, as well as enhanced educational opportunities for Central Oregon's school children. The proposal to acclimate young salmonids before release also has merit in my opinion.
This project has real potential for good and I sincerely hope it can be funded!
Respectfully,
Clifford S. Price 60075 Stirling Drive Bend, OR 97702
1 Attachment 5, Page 51 of 82 Letters of Opposition from Individuals
Attachment 5, Page 52 of 82 From: ODFW Info To: Kevin Herkamp Subject: FW: ODFW Youth Angling Pond in Camp Sherman Date: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 4:01:30 PM Attachments: Gov. Brown.docx
From: Gary Gustafson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 3:43 PM To: SEN Johnson
Legislators, agencies and individuals,
I attach a copy of a letter sent to Governor Brown concerning a proposal by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) to develop a large youth fishing pond on 15 acres they own and manage in Camp Sherman. This pond would be funded through a $200k+ grant from the Oregon Restoration and Enhancement Board. The R&E Board has already approved it and the next step is consideration by the Fish and Wildlife Commission.
While no one should argue with affording the youth of our state another opportunity to fish, in my opinion this proposal has many fatal flaws. It's simply in the wrong location, duplicates an existing pond in Camp Sherman already used for youth angling, could threaten the quality of local water sources and will require annual ODFW maintenance funding outside of the grant request (at a time when the agency is very budget constrained). In addition, it appears inconsistent with the USFS Metolius Wild and Scenic River Management Plan and the purpose of the recently enacted Metolius Area of Critical State Concern.
I request that this R&E grant request proposal be suspended for at least one year - to afford an opportunity for a negotiated long-term solution satisfactory to all parties. This is a good opportunity for the Governor's Office, DLCD or other entity to take the lead and sponsor new discussions between ODFW, the Deschutes Land Trust and the Friends of the Metolius, whereby ODFW could be compensated and most or all of this property could receive long- term protection and continue to be used for public educational purposes. I have been in contact with the Deschutes Land Trust and they are interested and prepared to participate in this process.
Please let me know if I may provide further clarification. Thank you.
Gary "Gus" Gustafson Camp Sherman 541-595-1115
Attachment 5, Page 53 of 82
June 14, 2016
The Honorable Kate Brown, Governor 160 State Capital 900 Court Street Salem, OR 97301-4047
Re: Proposed ODFW Youth Angling and Acclimation Pond in Camp Sherman
Dear Governor Brown:
On July 15, 2009 Governor Kulongoski signed into law legislation designating the Metolius Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC). This legislation was designed to protect the Metolius Basin from large- scale development that is inconsistent with the unique environmental, cultural and scenic values and resources of the basin.
However, today we have yet another threat to the Metolius Basin. Ironically, this new threat comes not from private development, but from the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW). ODFW has proposed to develop a one-half acre pond, parking area, vault toilet, parking for RV host, handicap access, picnic site and related facilities in an undeveloped meadow on the 15 acre property it manages near Spring Creek in Camp Sherman. Spring Creek is a major tributary of the Metolius River, and the many springs in and near this meadow are the sole water source for nearby Cold Springs Resort, Camp Sherman General Store, U.S. Post Office and many private residences.
The ODFW property was originally acquired and used for a fish hatchery along Spring Creek, but the hatchery closed back in 1969. Since then, the property has remained unused, except for an older house on the west side that was rented out for years and is now used as temporary housing for an ODFW employee and family from the Wizard Falls Fish Hatchery.
The Issue
Recently, in an effort to justify retention of this property, ODFW came up with the proposal of developing a Youth Angling and Acclimation Pond. To fund construction of this proposal, ODFW applied for a grant (Project #15-037 for $208,545) through the Oregon Restoration and Enhancement Board (R&E Board). The R&E Board mission is provide funding to increase recreation fishing opportunities and improve commercial fisheries. The funds come from a dedicated surcharge on all Oregon angling licenses and commercial fishing fees.
Duplication and Costs
At first glance, a youth fishing pond seems attractive. Who could argue with enhancing fishing opportunities for the youth of this state? However, there is already an excellent youth angling (and acclimation) pond in existence near Camp Sherman. I’m referring to the settling pond at the ODFW
1
Attachment 5, Page 54 of 82 Wizard Falls Fish Hatchery, located about 4 miles further downstream. The Wizard Falls pond already has adequate parking, handicap access, electric access, rest rooms, picnic area and educational sign boards. In fact, once a year the ODFW opens it up for youth angling. On June 3, 2016 it was noticed in the Sisters Nugget as being available for free youth fishing. Why not do the same during part or all the summer? The hatchery pond also has the advantage of already being public access controlled, with daily operating hours from 8 am to 7 pm. In addition, there are always ODFW on-site personnel (5.5 FTE) who monitor its operations.
As you know, the ODFW is currently struggling to find sufficient funding to cover its annual budget. Hunting and fishing license fees are about tapped out and increases are unpopular. Yet ODFW would now use state funds to construct an entire new facility and then absorb into its budget all the associated maintenance costs and responsibilities (includes trash removal, electricity for RV host, vault toilet care and tank emptying, gate and parking area monitoring and security, pond water testing, etc.)?
Water Quality Concerns
Just like Wizard Falls, the new pond will need to be regularly tested and monitored to ensure fish health and public safety. Monitoring of total suspended solids, settleable solids, ph, total ammonia and phosphorous, dissolved oxygen and water temperature will be required if the pond is to serve its intended purpose. Who will pay for this ongoing monitoring? Furthermore, due to the proximity of the pond and its effluents to the nearby springs that serve untreated as the water source for the surrounding lodge, general store, post office and private residences, how can we be assured that our water will remain safe? The continuance of our pristine water supply is essential – at a minimum, DEQ and Jefferson County will need to conduct periodic testing. Again, who will pay for this to occur? These water quality testing and monitoring steps are not part of the ODFW R&E grant request.
The prospect of diverting water from the springs in the meadow into a large artificial pond where it would accumulate considerable fish waste and sediments is also daunting. Will youth also be allowed to clean their fish in the pond also? What about all the dog waste sure to accumulate nearby if the area is used daily by the public?
The effluents from the pond are described as being released back into the adjacent wetlands. Where it may go from there is anyone’s guess. The ODFW has already dug a trench near the pond location proposal to test water depth. I’ve examined this trench and find that there is at least an 18” to 24” gap from the standing water level back up to the edge of the meadow. How do we know this pond will even work? Will there be life jackets and a safety monitor present at all times to prevent children from falling in? During the winter months when it is closed, it will be very easy for anyone to simply walk around the gate and access the pond. The presence of fish will be a constant public attraction, even when the pond area is closed during the winter months. What is the potential liability to the ODFW for public trespass and how will the winter closure be enforced?
Inconsistency with the USFS Metolius Wild and Scenic River Management Plan
You may also be aware that the Oregon State Parks is now moving ahead to delist the popular Metolius Loops State Scenic Bikeway in the Camp Sherman area. State Parks believes that delisting is necessary as the promotion for the scenic bikeway put the agency directly in conflict with the U.S. Forest Service’s Metolius Wild and Scenic River Management Plan. Through this plan, the U.S. Forest Service has
2
Attachment 5, Page 55 of 82 expressed its concern for the carrying capacity, congestion and future impact on visitor experiences the bikeway way create in the Metolius Basin. As a result, State Parks felt it had no choice but to delist the scenic bikeway. Now ODFW would build a large youth angling pond less than 50 yards from the Metolius River, right in the middle of Camp Sherman. In order for the pond to be used, it will need to be actively promoted to the public. Indeed, ODFW already publishes notice in the Bend Bulletin and Sisters Nugget when youth fishing is allowed at the Wizard Falls Fish Hatchery settlement pond. There is little doubt that another youth fishing pond would attract considerable additional visitors in the summer, with associated traffic and congestion to further compromise the already stressed carrying capacity of this sensitive area. Promotion of a new fishing pond here would also conflict with the U.S. Forest Service Metolius Wild and Scenic River Management Plan.
Impact on Wildlife
What about all the local predators that will be immediately attracted to a pond full of fish – i.e. river otters, raccoons, coyotes, eagles, osprey, herons, etc.? How will they be dealt with? The Wizard Falls fish hatchery has installed an electric fence around its spillways. At Wizard Falls the ODFW regularly issues itself predator take permits to remove otters that get into the hatchery area. Will that also be necessary here?
Public Process
The ODFW has conducted two public meetings in Camp Sherman to discuss this proposal. The initial meeting occurred last fall and was the first most locals had ever heard of the pond proposal. This first meeting included a map displaying the location of a large new pond (one-half acre), parking area, access road, vault toilet, picnic area and related facilities; all but the pond to be located near Spring Creek under the trees at the eastern side of the property. This soon caused an uproar from nearby landowners and summer cabin residents located close to the site. As a result, the ODFW revised its development plan and moved the location of the parking area, vault toilet and related facilities to the far northwest corner of the property. However, they did this without consulting, or even contacting, any of the private landowners located adjacent to, or nearby, to the new parking area location. ODFW then held a second public meeting this spring that was the first most of these landowners knew of the revised proposal. As you can imagine, quite a few Camp Sherman residents, particularly those in proximity to the revised development, were very upset.
Since the last public meeting, ODFW has continued to advance the project, advocating for it before the R&E Board at its May 20, 2016 meeting in Enterprise (not a location conducive to local attendance). Only after the R&E Board approved the funding for the proposal at that meeting did ODFW bother to send local residents an explanation of how the proposal had changed and how they might be impacted.
ODFW has conducted a poor job of public relations throughout this process. At the last public meeting in Camp Sherman, an ODFW employee even had the gall to tell everyone present that if the locals didn’t like the proposal, ODFW would sell the property and we’d get new private residences in the meadow. Frankly, that scenario would be preferable to what ODFW wants to do. The property is zoned Rural Residential 5 acre minimum (RR-5) by Jefferson County, so only two additional private homes could ever be built there. That would be preferable to the entire meadow being destroyed by a pond with relatively unregulated public use and associated threats to our water supply.
3
Attachment 5, Page 56 of 82 Surplus Property Process
Also, if ODFW did surplus the property, it would be required to go through the state surplus real property process administered by the Real Estate Division in the Department of Administrative Services (OAR 125-045-0200). This process allows other state agencies the first crack at it and also provides that notices be given to non-profits, Indian tribes and political subdivisions. I mention this because a few years ago, the Deschutes Land Trust (DLT) acquired a conservation easement on the private property on the south side of Spring Creek (Livingston’s) and is now interested in entering into discussions that could lead to acquisition of the ODFW property on the north side of Spring Creek (confirmed per Brad Nye, DLT Conservation Director). There have already been discussions on this with ODFW, the Friends of the Metolius (FOM) and others over finding a way to permanently protect this area. These discussions should now resume. You may be aware that the DLT already conducts nature and birding hikes along Spring Creek as part of its efforts to educate the public about the value of riparian areas and efforts to reintroduce sockeye and Chinook salmon. Indeed, the ODFW property would be a prime location for DLT’s ongoing public education on fishery enhancement – without building a giant artificial pond and destroying a valuable meadow and associated habitat.
Summary and Recommendation
I write you because this funding proposal is just wrong on so many counts it needs to be stopped. I’ve already mentioned that ODFW has a fit for purpose pond at the Wizard Falls fish hatchery that can be used nicely without impacting an undeveloped wetland meadow. The hatchery there is also capable of acclimating fish and delivering them for release into Spring Creek.
As a former Oregon state resource agency director and former Chair of the Governor’s Watershed Enhancement Board (GWEB), I’ve personally reviewed many proposals across the state intended to create or enhance wetlands and fishery habitat. Based upon my background, this proposal does not have sufficient merit to warrant any state funding. It duplicates an existing facility in the immediate vicinity, conflicts with the U.S. Forest Service Metolius Wild and Scenic River Management Plan and runs contrary to the intent of legislation protecting the Metolius ACSC. Furthermore, it could jeopardize the existing pristine water supply relied upon by many local residents and will destroy one of the last open meadows left in Camp Sherman. Lastly, it creates ongoing maintenance costs and responsibilities for ODFW that have not been addressed.
Yes, there are ways some of these issues might be addressed and mitigated. The problem is that they will all cost money. My recommendation, and that of many in Camp Sherman, is that this proposal not go forward. Instead, let’s invite the DLT back to the table and see if a long-term solution can be achieved – one that will protect this area permanently and also compensate ODFW for the loss of the property. I believe that the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) would be an ideal facilitator to accomplish this goal. Working together, the DLCD, ODFW, DLT, Friends of the Metolius, USFS and others could negotiate a long-term settlement that could compensate ODFW for the property and preserve some or all of the meadow and riparian habitat along Spring Creek for public education.
With that in mind, I request that this proposal be suspended for at least one year to allow time for a long-term negotiated solution.
4
Attachment 5, Page 57 of 82 Thank you for your consideration.
Cordially,
Original/signed
Gary “Gus” Gustafson P.O. Box 442 Camp Sherman, OR 97730 541-595-1115
Cc: Richard Whitman, Governor’s Office Curt Melcher, ODFW Jim Rue, DLCD Scott Edelman, DLCD Sen. Betsy Johnson Sen. Ted Ferrioli Brad Nye, Deschutes Land Trust Doug Hancock, Friends of the Metolius Kristie Miller, USFS
5
Attachment 5, Page 58 of 82 Attachment 5, Page 59 of 82 Attachment 5, Page 60 of 82 Attachment 5, Page 61 of 82 Attachment 5, Page 62 of 82 Attachment 5, Page 63 of 82 Attachment 5, Page 64 of 82 Kevin Herkamp
From: Sue
Dear Jen, Thank you for the informativery presentation regarding ODFW's proposed fishing pond in Camp Sherman. I'd like to let you know that I am saddened to learn of these plans for this exquisitely pristine area, since I have long believed it is à preserve for the many deer and fawns, coyotes, nesting geese and hundreds of other species I see there so frequently. So, my first wish is that this land be left untouched.
However, should ODFW go forward with development of this site, I appreciate efforts to create a low impact facility, and trust that the area will be constructed and managed with the utmost respect.
Putting the vault toilet close to the pond seems a far better choice than locating it at the parking lot. The same rationale holds true for the location of the host. Having these "where the action is" makes sense. Nobody wants to hike 200 feet when nature calls, and people, not parking lots, need supervision.
I heard many concerns relating to monitoring the site to ensure that rules are followed for the benefit of of all concerned. Your plan has mapped out 40 hours per week of supervision by a host, as well as such help as volunteers can provide. This will not be adequate unless ODFW limits the number of hours per day and days per week the pond is open to the public. Please consider a 5 day week including both weekends and weekdays so families as school groups will find times they can visit. Limited hours would concentrate staff involvement and provide "rest" for the host, volunteers, wildlife, landowners and facilities.
As others suggested, having two gates would add security to the premises. A gate to close the parking lot during off hours, as well as a gate to close access between the lot and the pond are necessary. I also suggest that you screen the parking lot with some plantings, perhaps pines and vine maple.
Thank you for considering my concerns.
Sincerely, Sue Blanchard, Camp Sherman landowner
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Tab®4
1 Attachment 5, Page 65 of 82 Attachment 5, Page 66 of 82 Attachment 5, Page 67 of 82 Attachment 5, Page 68 of 82 Attachment 5, Page 69 of 82 Attachment 5, Page 70 of 82 Attachment 5, Page 71 of 82 Kevin Herkamp
From: ODFW Comments Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 3:16 PM To: Kevin Herkamp; Amanda Mckenzie Subject: FW: Youth Angling and Acclimation Pond - Camp Sherman Attachments: Livinsgston letter to Director, ODFW.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged
Categories: R&E
From: William Morley [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 7:29 AM To: [email protected] Cc: William Morley
January 18, 2016
Please enter this letter into the public record.
My family has owned property in Camp Sherman for over 50 years. During that time we have seen dramatic improvements in the preservation efforts, wildlife management and ecological conservation in Camp Sherman and on our property and the surrounding area.
On behalf of my wife, my 4 children and my extended family, I want to express our deepest concerns and opposition regarding the angling pond and Chinook Salmon Acclimation facility proposal for the old salmon hatchery site on Spring Creek.
You have already received a letter from Bruce Livingston and most, if not all of the landowners adjacent or nearby the proposed site for the new facility. I am attaching a copy of that letter for your reference. We associate ourselves completely with those comments and that sentiment. I do not want to simply repeat those objections and observations in this letter.
Instead, I would like to add three key points:
1. We were never fully consulted on the breadth and extent of this proposal. After years of discussions about management of our very sensitive wildlife area, I would have thought that, at a minimum, we would have been alerted and consulted. Not only are we directly impacted, but we have a long-standing understanding and passion for protecting the wildlife and habitat in this fragile ecosystem. Simply charging forward with a fairly significant development goes far beyond what was previously discussed and committed to our families with Bruce Nye and others, but it also undermines the efforts we have taken to protect the area. In addition to the environmental impact, I would imagine that there should be a full assessment of the financial cost of such a project -- not just the construction, but the ongoing maintenance, protection and oversight of the facilities. 1 Attachment 5, Page 72 of 82
2. I find it hard to imagine, at a time of extreme fiscal and financial hardship, that the state, county and local government don't have better uses for the funds that would be dedicated to this project. Camp Sherman, the Metolius River and surrounding parks have ample and extensive sites for fishing, wildlife observation, picnicking and recreation. Wouldn't it make more sense to develop those sites than to create an entirely new and likely expensive site, where the ecological impact has not yet been fully assessed? Elected (and appointed) officials will have a hard time answering difficult and pointed questions about this gross fiscal and ecological mismanagement. Perhaps that is why this project is being rushed forward under the cover of darkness with very little advance notice and opportunity for a full and fair hearing....
3. Has there been a full cost-benefit analysis and environmental impact assessment conducted on the proposed development of the site? How will water runoff from the parking lots impact salmon and other fish in Spring Creek and the Metolius? How about litter and leakage from restroom facilities? How are people expected to access the site? Has there been any assessment of the impact on the road and bridges? What is the intended demographic that is intended to be benefited by this project and how and to what extent are those intended users otherwise unable to enjoy a similar experience in the region? How far are they traveling to come to use the facilities? Are there alternate sites available within a reasonable driving or commuting radius from their homes or local communities? For example, how many people are expected to travel from Sisters? If there is an expected positive economic impact from their presence in Camp Sherman, to what extent is that benefit causally linked to the new site and to what extent would that benefit already naturally and statistically occur due to attractions already in place (and for which no construction or maintenance costs would need to be incurred). These are just a few of the questions public servants must be prepared to answer BEFORE proceeding with these poorly conceived proposal.
We respectfully request that this project be put on hold until interested citizens are heard and all questions are answered.
Sincerely,
Bill, Nancy, Katie, Elizabeth, Samantha and Caroline Morley Morley Family Trust Property location: 12856 SW Springcreek Lane, Camp Sherman Oregon
Mailing address: 2515 N Upland Street, Arlington, VA 22207.
--
2 Attachment 5, Page 73 of 82
Curt Melcher, Director Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 4034 Fairview Industrial Drive SE Salem, OR 97302 January 18, 2016
Dear Mr. Melcher, We, the undersigned, have a number of serious concerns about the Spring Creek Youth Angling Pond and Chinook Salmon Acclimation Facility proposal for the old Salmon Hatchery site. 1. Brett Hodgson’s letter to the Restoration and Enhancement Board states “The District has already engaged in extensive public outreach regarding the proposed project. Community support in Camp Sherman and surrounding areas has been very positive. Affected parties view this as a great opportunity to provide much needed recreational opportunity for youths and assist with the anadromous reintroduction effort.” This is not correct. There has been very little communication with adjacent property owners, Forest Service leaseholders, and other landowners in Camp Sherman. Although Bruce Livingston was contacted and informed of this plan, adjacent land owners and Forest Service leaseholders Eric Gallenkamp, Myrna Klupenger, Susan Koe, Philip Krohn, Katherine Livingston, Eliza Livingston, Robert Millis, Samuel Morley, Shirley Ray, and Matthew Voorsanger, among others, were not informed of this proposed plan. 2. Associated with the lack of communication to non-commercial entities in Camp Sherman is the matter of significant changes in the proposal between September 2014 and June 2015. The initial proposal, dated 9-3-2014, states that the pond (to be constructed) is for the use of “youth 17 and under and for disabled anglers.” But in the R & E Grant Application dated 6/20/2015 there is a major change in focus – it will be “open to the public,” and the specific target populations listed are “Youth (<18 years old), Adults (18 years old or more), Families (Youth and Adult family members/mentors), New anglers, and School groups.” This is clearly a fundamental change in the purpose of this proposal, suggesting a very different use than what was presented in the first proposal and in the meeting held in Camp Sherman on March 17, 2015. 3. The statement that no “similar access sites, facilities, or fisheries exist within 10 miles of the project site” is not correct. The Wizard Falls Hatchery has all of the facilities in place – parking, bathrooms, and a large escapement pond that could easily provide ideal access for youth and disabled anglers. 4. We are concerned about issues of water quality associated with this project. The water temperature in the proposed pond will be warmer than the waters of Cold Springs, Spring Creek and the Metolius River. It will also be enriched with waste and nutrients associated with the population of trout resident in the pond, to the detriment of downstream waters.
Attachment 5, Page 74 of 82
5. We are deeply concerned about the proposed placement of a loop road, parking area and paved trails on the east side of the pond. There is no question that these constructions, along with the vehicles that use them will have a negative impact on the otherwise untrammeled riparian habitat near Spring Creek and a well-established wildlife migration route. This placement is at odds with the restoration work that has been done both along the creek and on the site of the former fish hatchery. Placing roads on the downslope to the creek and within a high wildlife use riparian area seems in conflict with ODFW's mission to protect habitat. If the angling pond project were to move forward it would make much more sense to place the parking, host and toilet facilities at the NW end of the property in close association with the existing caretaker's house. 6. There is an overriding question about the logic of this project. The primary stated goal is to recruit more Oregonians to become license-purchasing fishermen/women. How effective is this project likely to be in achieving this goal? There are youth ponds located near each of the cities in Central Oregon. A May 2013 article in the Bend Bulletin states “Youth ponds in Central Oregon include Shevlin Pond and Pine Nursery Pond in Bend, Fireman's Pond in Redmond, Prineville Youth Pond and the Jefferson County Youth Pond in Madras. “We've come up with a 25-year angling enhancement plan, and that's what it's about,” said Jen Luke, assistant fish biologist for the ODFW in Bend. “Of course, we want to sell fishing licenses, and we want people to be interested in fishing and hunting. The more opportunity we can provide at a younger age, the better.”” How likely is a similar pond in Camp Sherman to significantly affect the stated goal? Unlike the ponds cited above, Camp Sherman is nowhere near a significant population center. It would seem that the marginal gains for this proposed development would not be worth the expense. The ODFW proposal states “Angling on the Metolius River is restricted to fly-fishing only, catch and release. Due to the regulation and its physical setting, it is difficult for young or disabled angler to catch fish in the Metolius River and the immediate area lacks easy fishing opportunities for young people. The pond creates an outdoor recreation opportunity, namely angling, for youth 17 and under. A stocked rainbow trout fishery provides an easy place for young people to fish.” The fact that the Metolius River is difficult to fish is one of its great attractions. People of my generation who love the Metolius learned to fish it by doing it, often taught by our father or mothers, aunts and uncles. The same holds for our children’s generation. A shallow pond stocked with hatchery fish will in no way prepare young and inexperienced fishermen for fishing in the Metolius. And it promotes a kind of approach to fishing that ODFW, fishing groups and the community worked hard to modify through the strict catch and release regulations that were designed to protect wild trout fisheries. We believe that the current school educational outings offered at the ODFW site are an appropriate and valuable use of this sensitive property. The property, because it has been very lightly used since the closure of the old salmon hatchery, has become a wildlife refuge. Because it is contiguous with an easement-protected major private parcel and adjoins undeveloped national forest, it serves the purpose of supporting wildlife as critical habitat for innumerable permanent and transient activities. 82 species of birds have been identified on the adjoining easement parcel, along with cougar, beaver, river otter, elk, coyote, snowshoe hare, and many other mammal species. Given the ever increasing pressure on limited wildlife
Attachment 5, Page 75 of 82
areas that include pristine riparian areas, this property provides an ideal opportunity to promote values associated with ODFW: “Our mission is to protect and enhance Oregon's fish and wildlife and their habitats for use and enjoyment by present and future generations.” The current school program goes a long way towards realizing this goal without permanently compromising this rare, high quality cold springs riparian habitat, while increasing interest in its thoughtful protection. We believe these school projects are very effective in educating the youth of today to become good stewards of the environments we treasure, in particular the designated Wild and Scenic Metolius River. We would like to see the fate of this fragile site decided in a more transparent, collaborative process. We respectfully request that this project be put on hold until interested citizens are heard. Sincerely,
Eric Gallenkamp 12856 Spring Creek Lane Camp Sherman OR 97730
Arwen Gallenkamp 12856 Spring Creek Lane Camp Sherman OR 97730
Attachment 5, Page 76 of 82
Curt Melcher, Director Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 4034 Fairview Industrial Drive SE Salem, OR 97302 January 13, 2016
Dear Mr. Melcher, We, the undersigned, have a number of serious concerns about the Spring Creek Youth Angling Pond and Chinook Salmon Acclimation Facility proposal for the old Salmon Hatchery site. 1. Brett Hodgson’s letter to the Restoration and Enhancement Board states “The District has already engaged in extensive public outreach regarding the proposed project. Community support in Camp Sherman and surrounding areas has been very positive. Affected parties view this as a great opportunity to provide much needed recreational opportunity for youths and assist with the anadromous reintroduction effort.” This is not correct. There has been very little communication with adjacent property owners, Forest Service leaseholders, and other landowners in Camp Sherman. Although Bruce Livingston was contacted and informed of this plan, adjacent land owners and Forest Service leaseholders Eric Gallenkamp, Myrna Klupenger, Susan Koe, Philip Krohn, Katherine Livingston, Eliza Livingston, Robert Millis, Samuel Morley, Shirley Ray, and Matthew Voorsanger, among others, were not informed of this proposed plan. 2. Associated with the lack of communication to non-commercial entities in Camp Sherman is the matter of significant changes in the proposal between September 2014 and June 2015. The initial proposal, dated 9-3-2014, states that the pond (to be constructed) is for the use of “youth 17 and under and for disabled anglers.” But in the R & E Grant Application dated 6/20/2015 there is a major change in focus – it will be “open to the public,” and the specific target populations listed are “Youth (<18 years old), Adults (18 years old or more), Families (Youth and Adult family members/mentors), New anglers, and School groups.” This is clearly a fundamental change in the purpose of this proposal, suggesting a very different use than what was presented in the first proposal and in the meeting held in Camp Sherman on March 17, 2015. 3. The statement that no “similar access sites, facilities, or fisheries exist within 10 miles of the project site” is not correct. The Wizard Falls Hatchery has all of the facilities in place – parking, bathrooms, and a large escapement pond that could easily provide ideal access for youth and disabled anglers. 4. We are concerned about issues of water quality associated with this project. The water temperature in the proposed pond will be warmer than the waters of Cold Springs, Spring Creek and the Metolius River. It will also be enriched with waste and nutrients associated with the population of trout resident in the pond, to the detriment of downstream waters.
Attachment 5, Page 77 of 82
5. We are deeply concerned about the proposed placement of a loop road, parking area and paved trails on the east side of the pond. There is no question that these constructions, along with the vehicles that use them will have a negative impact on the otherwise untrammeled riparian habitat near Spring Creek and a well-established wildlife migration route. This placement is at odds with the restoration work that has been done both along the creek and on the site of the former fish hatchery. Placing roads on the downslope to the creek and within a high wildlife use riparian area seems in conflict with ODFW's mission to protect habitat. If the angling pond project were to move forward it would make much more sense to place the parking, host and toilet facilities at the NW end of the property in close association with the existing caretaker's house. 6. There is an overriding question about the logic of this project. The primary stated goal is to recruit more Oregonians to become license-purchasing fishermen/women. How effective is this project likely to be in achieving this goal? There are youth ponds located near each of the cities in Central Oregon. A May 2013 article in the Bend Bulletin states “Youth ponds in Central Oregon include Shevlin Pond and Pine Nursery Pond in Bend, Fireman's Pond in Redmond, Prineville Youth Pond and the Jefferson County Youth Pond in Madras. “We've come up with a 25-year angling enhancement plan, and that's what it's about,” said Jen Luke, assistant fish biologist for the ODFW in Bend. “Of course, we want to sell fishing licenses, and we want people to be interested in fishing and hunting. The more opportunity we can provide at a younger age, the better.”” How likely is a similar pond in Camp Sherman to significantly affect the stated goal? Unlike the ponds cited above, Camp Sherman is nowhere near a significant population center. It would seem that the marginal gains for this proposed development would not be worth the expense. The ODFW proposal states “Angling on the Metolius River is restricted to fly-fishing only, catch and release. Due to the regulation and its physical setting, it is difficult for young or disabled angler to catch fish in the Metolius River and the immediate area lacks easy fishing opportunities for young people. The pond creates an outdoor recreation opportunity, namely angling, for youth 17 and under. A stocked rainbow trout fishery provides an easy place for young people to fish.” The fact that the Metolius River is difficult to fish is one of its great attractions. People of my generation who love the Metolius learned to fish it by doing it, often taught by our father or mothers, aunts and uncles. The same holds for our children’s generation. A shallow pond stocked with hatchery fish will in no way prepare young and inexperienced fishermen for fishing in the Metolius. And it promotes a kind of approach to fishing that ODFW, fishing groups and the community worked hard to modify through the strict catch and release regulations that were designed to protect wild trout fisheries. We believe that the current school educational outings offered at the ODFW site are an appropriate and valuable use of this sensitive property. The property, because it has been very lightly used since the closure of the old salmon hatchery, has become a wildlife refuge. Because it is contiguous with an easement-protected major private parcel and adjoins undeveloped national forest, it serves the purpose of supporting wildlife as critical habitat for innumerable permanent and transient activities. 82 species of birds have been identified on the adjoining easement parcel, along with cougar, beaver, river otter, elk, coyote, snowshoe hare, and many other mammal species. Given the ever increasing pressure on limited wildlife
Attachment 5, Page 78 of 82
areas that include pristine riparian areas, this property provides an ideal opportunity to promote values associated with ODFW: “Our mission is to protect and enhance Oregon's fish and wildlife and their habitats for use and enjoyment by present and future generations.” The current school program goes a long way towards realizing this goal without permanently compromising this rare, high quality cold springs riparian habitat, while increasing interest in its thoughtful protection. We believe these school projects are very effective in educating the youth of today to become good stewards of the environments we treasure, in particular the designated Wild and Scenic Metolius River. We would like to see the fate of this fragile site decided in a more transparent, collaborative process. We respectfully request that this project be put on hold until interested citizens are heard. Sincerely,
Bruce Livingston Philip Krohn Myrna Klupenger Susan Koe Katherine Livingston Eliza Livingston Robert Millis Samuel Morley Shirley Ray Matthew Voorsanger
Attachment 5, Page 79 of 82 Kevin Herkamp
From: ODFW Comments Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 3:20 PM To: Kevin Herkamp Subject: FW: Youth Angling and Acclimation Pond - Camp Sherman
Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged
Categories: R&E
From: Susan Koe [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 8:16 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Youth Angling and Acclimation Pond ‐ Camp Sherman
Please enter this letter into the public record:
Curt Melcher, Director Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 4034 Fairview Industrial Drive SE Salem, OR 97302
January 13, 2016
Dear Mr. Melcher,
We, the undersigned, have a number of serious concerns about the Spring Creek Youth Angling Pond and Chinook Salmon Acclimation Facility proposal for the old Salmon Hatchery site.
1. Brett Hodgson’s letter to the Restoration and Enhancement Board states “The District has already engaged in extensive public outreach regarding the proposed project. Community support in Camp Sherman and surrounding areas has been very positive. Affected parties view this as a great opportunity to provide much needed recreational opportunity for youths and assist with the anadromous reintroduction effort.”
This is not correct. There has been very little communication with adjacent property owners, Forest Service leaseholders, and other landowners in Camp Sherman. Although Bruce Livingston was contacted and informed of this plan, adjacent land owners and Forest Service leaseholders Eric Gallenkamp, Myrna Klupenger, Susan Koe, Philip Krohn, Katherine Livingston, Eliza Livingston, Robert Millis, Samuel Morley, Shirley Ray, and Matthew Voorsanger, among others, were not informed of this proposed plan.
2. Associatedwiththelackofcommunicationtonon-commercialentitiesinCamp Sherman is the matter of significant changes in the proposal between September 2014 and June 2015.
1 Attachment 5, Page 80 of 82 The initial proposal, dated 9-3-2014, states that the pond (to be constructed) is for the use of “youth 17 and under and for disabled anglers.”
But in the R & E Grant Application dated 6/20/2015 there is a major change in focus – it will be “open to the public,” and the specific target populations listed are “Youth (<18 years old), Adults (18 years old or more), Families (Youth and Adult family members/mentors), New anglers, and School groups.” This is clearly a fundamental change in the purpose of this proposal, suggesting a very different use than what was presented in the first proposal and in the meeting held in Camp Sherman on March 17, 2015.
3. Thestatementthatno“similaraccesssites,facilities,orfisheriesexistwithin10milesoftheproject site” is not correct.
The Wizard Falls Hatchery has all of the facilities in place – parking, bathrooms, and a large escapement pond that could easily provide ideal access for youth and disabled anglers.
4. Weareconcernedaboutissuesofwaterqualityassociatedwiththisproject.
The water temperature in the proposed pond will be warmer than the waters of Cold Springs, Spring Creek and the Metolius River. It will also be enriched with waste and nutrients associated with the population of trout resident in the pond, to the detriment of downstream waters.
5. Wearedeeplyconcernedabouttheproposedplacementofalooproad,parkingareaand paved trails on the east side of the pond. There is no question that these constructions, along with the vehicles that use them will have a negative impact on the otherwise untrammeled riparian habitat near Spring Creek and a well-established wildlife migration route. This placement is at odds with the restoration work that has been done both along the creek and on the site of the former fish hatchery. Placing roads on the downslope to the creek and within a high wildlife use riparian area seems in conflict with ODFW's mission to protect habitat. If the angling pond project were to move forward it would make much more sense to place the parking, host and toilet facilities at the NW end of the property in close association with the existing caretaker's house. 6. Thereisanoverridingquestionaboutthelogicofthisproject.Theprimarystatedgoalis to recruit more Oregonians to become license-purchasing fishermen/women. How effective is this project likely to be in achieving this goal?
There are youth ponds located near each of the cities in Central Oregon. A May 2013 article in the Bend Bulletin states
“Youth ponds in Central Oregon include Shevlin Pond and Pine Nursery Pond in Bend, Fireman's Pond in Redmond, Prineville Youth Pond and the Jefferson County Youth Pond in Madras. “We've come up with a 25-year angling enhancement plan, and that's what it's about,” said Jen Luke, assistant fish biologist for the ODFW in Bend. “Of course, we want to sell fishing licenses, and we want people to be interested in fishing and hunting. The more opportunity we can provide at a younger age, the better.””
How likely is a similar pond in Camp Sherman to significantly affect the stated goal? Unlike the ponds cited above, Camp Sherman is nowhere near a significant population center. It would seem that the marginal gains for this proposed development would not be worth the expense.
The ODFW proposal states “Angling on the Metolius River is restricted to fly-fishing only, catch and release. Due to the regulation and its physical setting, it is difficult for young or disabled angler to catch fish in the Metolius River and the immediate area lacks easy fishing opportunities for young people. The pond creates an outdoor recreation opportunity, namely angling, for youth 17 and under. A stocked rainbow trout fishery provides an easy place for young people to fish.”
The fact that the Metolius River is difficult to fish is one of its great attractions. People of my generation who love the Metolius learned to fish it by doing it, often taught by our father or mothers, aunts and uncles. 2 Attachment 5, Page 81 of 82 The same holds for our children’s generation. A shallow pond stocked with hatchery fish will in no way prepare young and inexperienced fishermen for fishing in the Metolius. And it promotes a kind of approach to fishing that ODFW, fishing groups and the community worked hard to modify through the strict catch and release regulations that were designed to protect wild trout fisheries.
We believe that the current school educational outings offered at the ODFW site are an appropriate and valuable use of this sensitive property. The property, because it has been very lightly used since the closure of the old salmon hatchery, has become a wildlife refuge. Because it is contiguous with an easement-protected major private parcel and adjoins undeveloped national forest, it serves the purpose of supporting wildlife as critical habitat for innumerable permanent and transient activities. 82 species of birds have been identified on the adjoining easement parcel, along with cougar, beaver, river otter, elk, coyote, snowshoe hare, and many other mammal species. Given the ever increasing pressure on limited wildlife areas that include pristine riparian areas, this property provides an ideal opportunity to promote values associated with ODFW: “Our mission is to protect and enhance Oregon's fish and wildlife and their habitats for use and enjoyment by present and future generations.” The current school program goes a long way towards realizing this goal without permanently compromising this rare, high quality cold springs riparian habitat, while increasing interest in its thoughtful protection.
We believe these school projects are very effective in educating the youth of today to become good stewards of the environments we treasure, in particular the designated Wild and Scenic Metolius River.
We would like to see the fate of this fragile site decided in a more transparent, collaborative process.
We respectfully request that this project be put on hold until interested citizens are heard.
Sincerely,
Susan Koe
3 Attachment 5, Page 82 of 82