Final Environmental Impact Statement
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
United States Department of Agriculture Final Forest Service July 2003 Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision Metolius Basin Forest Management Project Sisters Ranger District, Deschutes National Forest Jefferson County, Oregon The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion. age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Metolius Basin Forest Management Project Final Environmental Impact Statement METOLIUS BASIN FOREST MANAGEMENT PROJECT Final Environmental Impact Statement Jefferson County, Oregon Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Responsible Official: Leslie Weldon Deschutes National Forest 1645 Highway 20 E Bend, OR 97701 For Information Contact: Kris Martinson, Project Leader Sisters Ranger District P.O. Box 249 Sisters, OR 97759 541-549-7730 Abstract: The USDA Forest Service is proposing to implement fuel reduction and forest health management activities in order to meet the goals of reducing the risk of catastrophic wildfire, insect or disease events in the project area; protecting people, property and tribal and natural resource values; restoring old-growth forests, and protecting water and soil quality. Proposed actions include thinning dense forest stands, burning surface fuels, mowing dense shrubs, and closing roads, on approximately 12,600 acres of National Forest lands. Approximately 1.6 miles of temporary roads may be developed to aid in the access to and removal of trees. An additional action would be a site-specific amendment of visual quality standards and guidelines in the Deschutes National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan to allow short-term visibility of thinning and burning activities. In addition, a site-specific, non-significant amendment of fuelwood standard and guideline in the Forest Plan is also proposed to allow the Forest Service to permit commercial and personal use fuelwood collection in the Metolius Heritage area. This project is located in the Metolius Basin on the Sisters Ranger District in Central Oregon. The entire project area is within a Late-Successional Reserve and encompasses a portion of the Metolius Basin Wild and Scenic River. Five alternatives were fully analyzed to gain an understanding of potential impacts of different strategies for meeting project goals. Alternative 3, as described and analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) is the Selected Alternative. Modifications have been incorporated into the Selected Alternative. The modifications included in the Selected Alternative are fully analyzed and disclosed in the different alternatives presented in the Draft and Final EIS and its associated specialists reports and appendices. The Record of Decision describes the Selected Alternative as Alternative 3 – Modified and the rationale for the decision. i Metolius Basin Forest Management Project Final Environmental Impact Statement TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary 3 Chapter 1. Purpose of and Need for Action 9 Document Structure ........................................................................................................ 9 Background................................................................................................................... 10 Purpose & Need for Action........................................................................................... 14 Proposed Action............................................................................................................ 16 Desired Future Condition............................................................................................. 23 Decision Framework..................................................................................................... 28 Public Involvement........................................................................................................ 28 Issues............................................................................................................................. 32 Chapter 2. Alternatives Considered 39 Alternatives Considered in Detail................................................................................. 49 Mitigation Common to All Action Alternatives............................................................. 62 Monitoring .................................................................................................................... 75 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Study...................................... 76 Comparison of Alternatives .......................................................................................... 79 Chapter 3. Affected Environment 101 Forest Vegetation and Late-Successional Habitat ..................................................... 101 Fire/Fuels/Air Quality ................................................................................................ 115 Wildlife........................................................................................................................ 127 Fish ............................................................................................................................. 158 Plants .......................................................................................................................... 164 Soil .............................................................................................................................. 171 Water Quality.............................................................................................................. 179 Roads........................................................................................................................... 186 Economic and Social Values....................................................................................... 189 Scenic Values .............................................................................................................. 192 Recreation and Lands ................................................................................................. 195 Heritage Resources..................................................................................................... 197 1 Metolius Basin Forest Management Project Final Environmental Impact Statement Chapter 4. Environmental Consequences 201 Key Issues #1, Vegetation Management in Late Successional Reserves and #2, Size of Trees Removed............................................................................................................ 201 Key Issue #3: Fire and Fuels..................................................................................... 226 Wildlife........................................................................................................................ 243 Plants .......................................................................................................................... 301 Key Issue # 4: Watershed/ Riparian/ Fish and Habitat/ Wild and Scenic River ........ 317 Key Issue #4: Soil....................................................................................................... 341 Key Issue #5: Road Access ........................................................................................ 368 Economics................................................................................................................... 371 Social Resources ......................................................................................................... 380 Scenic Resources......................................................................................................... 381 Recreation................................................................................................................... 388 Heritage Resources..................................................................................................... 392 Forest Plan Amendments ............................................................................................ 398 Other Effects ............................................................................................................... 401 Other Required Disclosures........................................................................................ 404 Chapter 5. Consultation and Coordination 405 Preparers and Contributors........................................................................................ 405 Index............................................................................................................................ 410 References and Citations ............................................................................................ 413 Metolius Heritage Demonstration Photos insert……….……………………Chapter 2, after pg. 46 APPENDIX A: Silvicultural and Fuel Treatments APPENDIX B: Stewardship Contracting and Multi-Party Monitoring APPENDIX C: Recommended Project Enhancements APPENDIX D: Ecological Types and Site Potentials APPENDIX E: Road Analysis Summary APPENDIX