Arxiv:2006.03757V1 [Quant-Ph] 6 Jun 2020 Rials

Research Article Journal of the Optical Society of America B 1

Quantum Metamaterials: Applications in quantum information science.

SOLOMONURIRI1,*, YASEERA ISMAIL1, AND FRANCESCOPETRUCCIONE1,2,3

1Quantum Research Group, School of Chemistry and Physics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, University Road, Durban, 4000, South Africa 2National Institute for Theoretical Physics, South Africa 3School of Electrical Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon, 34141, Republic of Korea *Corresponding author: [email protected]

Compiled September 11, 2021

Metamaterials are artificially engineered periodic structures with exceptional optical properties that are not found in conventional materials. However, this definition of metamaterials can be extended if we in- troduce a quantum degree of freedom by adding some quantum elements (e.g quantum dots, cold atoms, Josephson junctions, molecules). Quantum metamaterials can then be defined as artificially engineered nanostructures made up of quantum elements. Furthermore, they exhibit controllable quantum states, maintain quantum coherence for times much higher than the transversal time of the electromagnetic signal. Metamaterials have been used to realised invisibility cloaking, super-resolution, energy harvesting, and sensing. Most of these applications are performed in the classical regime. Of recent, metamaterials have gradually found their way into the quantum regime, particularly to quantum sensing and quantum information processing. The use of quantum metamaterials for quantum information processing is still new and rapidly growing. In quantum information processing, quantum metamaterials have enabled the control and manipulation of quantum states, single photon generation, creating quantum entanglement, quantum states switching, quantum search algorithm, quantum state engineering tasks, and many more. In this work, we briefly review the theory, fabrication and applications of quantum metamaterials to quantum information processing. © 2021 Optical Society of America http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/ao.XX.XXXXXX

1. INTRODUCTION Metamaterials are classified into various forms according to the material constituents, such as hyperbolic metamaterials [6], dielectric metamaterials [7], negative-index metamaterials [8], plasmonic metamaterials [9], superconducting metamaterials Metamaterials are artificially engineered materials which have [10], chiral metamaterials [11], and recently, quantum metamate- exotic optical properties that are not found in conventional materials [12]. In optics, most of the studies involving metamateri- arXiv:2006.03757v1 [quant-ph] 6 Jun 2020 rials. Metamaterials research was started in 1967 by Vaselego [1], als fall within the classical regime. However, little is currently who theoretically predicted materials with simultaneously effec- known on the applications of quantum metamaterials, partic- e tive negative permeability and effective magnetic permeability ularly to the areas of quantum communication and quantum µ , which give a negative refractive index. However, metamateri- computing. Quantum metamaterials (QMM) are artificially engi- als began to attract more attention in the scientific community in neered material whose optical properties are determined by the 1997, when Pendry [2] demonstrated the perfect lens and took a interplay of quantum effects in the constituent atoms with the major leap in 2001 when Smith et. al [3] experimentally realized electromagnetic field modes in the system. Quantum metamate- e µ the simultaneous effective negative and for the first time. rials are hence an artificial optical material within which the indi- This was a breakthrough, leading to some important and useful vidual unit cells demonstrate quantum coherence. Since nanos- applications which include electromagnetic cloak of a physi- tructures unit cells can preserve quantum coherence, QMM, are cal object using transformation optics [4] and super-resolution being realized as having important applications in quantum com- imaging [5]. Traditionally, metamaterials are made from metallic munication. Interest in the study of the applications of quantum nanostructures with size much smaller than the incident wave- metamaterials to quantum communication is therefore growing length. The metallic nanostructures are arranged periodically, rapidly and has yielded some remarkable success. For example, with the collective behaviour of the nanostructures. This gives quantum entanglement, a unique quantum resource for quan- rise to the bulk optical response of the material. Research Article Journal of the Optical Society of America B 2

the quantum states of qubits or single photons on the scale of ∧. ∧ describes the state of both the electromagnetic ﬁeld and the quantum metamaterial, characterised by a non-diagonal, non- local, position- and state-dependent effective refractive index. Here, s is the size of the nanostructure unit cells. However, the above equation is mostly applied to superconducting quantum metamaterials. For optical quantum metamaterials, some new quantum effects are added to the system Hamiltonian given Eq. 1, whereby the individual terms correspond to

† † H0 = h¯ ω0aˆ aˆ + h¯ ωxσˆ σˆ (3) Fig. 1. A schematic of a quantum plasmonic metamaterial −iωt † +iωt −iωt † iωt with a gain media (a) and a schematic of the nanorods with HQMM = −E0µ(σˆ e + σˆ e ) − E0χ(aeˆ + aˆ e ) (4) dimensions dx = dy = 200 nm, t = 30 nm, l = 110 nm, and w = † † 45 nm (b). Here, dx = dy is the period, t = thickness, l = length, Hint = ihg¯ (aâˆ − σˆ σˆ ), (5) and = width. where ω0 and ωx are the resonance frequencies of the metallic nanoparticle plasmonic field mode and the quantum dot. aˆ†aˆ ˆ † ˆ tum communication, can easily be realized in QMM, where in and σ σ are the creator and annihilation operators for the metal- Ref. [12], the authors used a plasmonic metamaterial to carry out lic nanoparticles plasmonic field mode and the quantum dot, the distillation of quantum entanglement. Other applications respectively. In this last model, a quantum dot was added to of QMM are found in the making of polarizers [13], half and the plasmonic metamaterial to increase the emission rate in the quarter waveplates [14], reconfigurable quantum superlenses material. ω0 can be derived by using the Frohlish condition, and [8], as well as for the implementation of quantum algorithms the derivation details are given in [16]. [7], performing quantum state engineering [9], and quantum An analytical model for active metamaterial with quantum state polarisation control [15]. In this work, we briefly review elements was proposed by Chipouline et. al [17] to describe the theory, fabrication, applications, challenges and future direc- the complex dynamics of a hybrid system consisting of reason- tion of quantum metamaterials related to quantum information ably coupled classical resonators and quantum structures. The processing. model of Chipouline and his colleagues uses a density matrix approach together with an ideal harmonic oscillator equation to describe (for modelling) subwavelength plasmonics and op- 2. THEORY tical resonators. In 2012, Zhou et. al [18] theoretically charac- Localised surface plasmons (LSPs) are non-propagating excita- terized a negative index metamaterial slab using pairs of en- tion of the free electrons of metallic nanoparticles coupled to tangled photons and a modified Hong-Ou-Interferometer. The the electromagnetic field. LSPs are excited when the light of a authors reported the properties of dispersion and absorption of particular frequency is incident on a metal nanoparticles of sub- a negative-index metamaterial slab confirmed in fourth-order wavelength size. A conventional metamaterial can be described interference profile whereby a comparison with a coherent light by the material’s effective macroscopic parameters, which in- shows the advantages with a quantum field. Kamli et. al [19] clude e and µ. These parameters e and µ are easily described by proposed fast all-optical control of surface polaritons by plac- the Maxwell’s equations. However, from the microscopic point ing an electromagnetically induced transparency medium at an of view, these parameters are functions of the average quantum interface between two nanomaterials using a negative-index ma- states of the individual building blocks [8]. Interestingly, these terial. A quantum mechanical model was developed for an array states can be directly controlled and maintain phase coherence of coupled particle plasma by Pino et. al [20] whereby the model over the relevant spatial and temporal scales in quantum meta- was used to predict the coupling strength between plasmon that materials. Microscopically, the propagation of single photon surpasses or approaches the local dissipation, with quantum states or qubits (that is, a two-level quantum system) through entanglement preserved in the collective modes of the array. In the quantum metamaterials can be fully described using the 2012, a method for creating maximally entangled states compris- Jaynes-Cummings-Hubbard Hamiltonian defined as [8] ing two field quanta using a negative index metamaterial was proposed in [21]. In their scheme, two light fields of weak inten- H = H0 + HQMM + Hint, (1) sity are prepared in either polarization or coherent states and then caused them to interact with a composite medium near an and written explicitly as interface between a negative-index metamaterial and a dielectric. Also, Song et. al [22] proposed a model for obtaining Bell-type 1 † (k) (k) (k) † entangled coherent states for quantum information processing H = ∑ h¯ ωjbj bj − ∑(ekσz + ∆kσx ) + i ∑ ejkσz (bj − bj ), j 2 k jk using Cross-Kerr nonlinearity in a metamaterial. However, one (2) of the challenges with plasmonic metamaterial is the loss. To where the first term represents the unperturbed photon mode, reduce the loss usually encountered with plasmonic metamate- the second term is the qubit degrees of freedom and the third rial, Moiseev et. al [23] proposed a low-loss nonlinear negative term describes the interaction of the photon mode through the index metamaterial. In their scheme, two low-loss surface polari- quantum metamaterial. Using the quantum metamaterial, the ton that interact through the negative-index metamaterial retain control and the manipulation of the qubits is obtained via the their low-loss nature and yield large mutual π phase shift. Also, qubit Hamiltonian parameter. Note this is acquired through the it has been reported by Wuestner et. al [24] that loss could be matrix element ∆ or via e. Such an interaction form a photon overcome with gain in a negative-index metamaterial. Yannopa- wave packet with characteristic size ∆ s, and averaging over pas [25] in 2015 used a quantum correction model to study the Research Article Journal of the Optical Society of America B 3 effect of the electron tunnelling between two metallic surfaces in are the strength of this technique, but large area photomask re- the optical response of a three-dimensional plasmonic metamate- mains a challenge to overcome. NIL is a technique for creating rial with subnanometer gaps. Of recent, Sowa and Zagoskin [26] nanoscale patterns by mechanical deformation of imprint resist propose a model for an exactly solvable quantum metamaterial and subsequent process. NIL has a high resolution, low cost, when a quantum metamaterial interacting with an electromag- and high throughput. However, the residual imprint layer is the netic field is considered. In their work, they showed that the main challenge of this technique. Self-assembly lithography is interaction of the quantum metamaterial with the electromag- a method whereby nanostructures are created by self-assembly. netic field could be solved with the combination of the Haar This method enables large area fabrication, low cost and high transform and the Wigner-Weyl transform. throughput. The setback of this method is the lack of uniformity and limited patterns. 3. FABRICATION Hybrid lithography is a method that combines the above In this section, we briefly review the fabrication methods and mentioned lithography techniques to realize metasurfaces with techniques for QMMs. A QMM is fabricated in a similar way more complex structures, such as those relevant to quantum to other optical metamaterials. The fabrication methods are metamaterials. Hybrid lithography includes microsphere projec- classified into four categories: direct write, pattern transfer, hy- tion lithography (MPL) and hole-mask colloid and off-normal brid patterning lithography, and with the so called alternative deposition lithography (HMCODL). MPL is defined by local pro- techniques [27]. However, the most commonly used one is the jection lithography, with a single microsphere acting as a lens. direct write method which consists of electron beam lithography It uses self-assembled arrays of silica spheres as colloidal mi- (EBL), focused-ion beam, probe scanning, direct writing, and crolenses whereby each microlens project an image of a distant interference lithography. macroscopic mask onto the coated substrate. MPL is developed EBL is the process whereby a focused Gaussian particle beam or for rapid prototyping of periodic and quasi-periodic metasur- focused electron is used to create custom shapes on an electron- faces. HMCODL is a new inexpensive technique that is based sensitive film (resist) covered surface. These patterns are created on colloidal self-assembly lithography patterning to make direc- either by a bottom-up or top-down approach. Both approaches tional metasurfaces [28]. This technique is suitable for large area are considered standard in metasurfaces fabrication. The choice and making of tilted structures. However, since it combines the of the method utilised depends on how the quantum metamateri- self-assembly technique, sample uniformity is still a challenge als are made. The bottom-down approach uses the deposition or to overcome. evaporation of molecules or atoms alongside with the lift-off process to create nanostructures or patterns, whereas the top-down An alternative technique is developed to cater for the limi- approach uses the etching process to create nanostructures. EBL tation of the above mentioned methods. This technique is new, is the most commonly used method in fabricating quantum meta- and it includes forward transfer lithography, ablation and dewet- materials because of the high resolution, good quality and ease ting lithography, and two photon lithography. Forward transfer of use. Focused ion beam (FIB) is another direct write method lithography is a high throughput and versatile technique that is which is commonly used to fabricate very small structures such based on the laser direct write technique. It is a one-step tech- as nanostructures or integrated circuits. FIB is a sputtering pro- nique for fabricating periodic and non-periodic nanostructures. cess whereby ion beam is used to mills the sample surface to However, a supporting transparent substrate is needed for this create patterns with nanometer precision. This method allows technique and no batch processes. Ablation and Dewetting is milling under direct visualization, but it is not suitable for large- also a laser based technique where nano-materials are lifted off area manufacturing due to high cost and low throughput. Some the surface of a substrate with a focusing laser. It is a single other limitations of FIB are the low aspect ratio, long milling step, cost efficient, lithography free technique for large scale time which could lead to spatial drift of the sample image and process. The last in this category is the two photon lithography sometimes, the sample damage during milling and imaging. In- (TPL) technique. TPL uses an ultrashort laser pulse to create terference lithography (IL) is a laser-based technique for creating nano-patterns for making 3-D nanostructures. The advantage irregular arrays patterns of nanostructures without the use of of TPL includes good geometry control, cleanroom free, and photomask or complex optical systems. The advantage of this scalable resolution. However, the limitation of photosensitive technique is the high fabrication speed and large area. IL is not materials and low efficiency of two-photon absorption remains a good method to fabricate periodic nanostructures such as plas- a challenge to overcome. monics metasurfaces. Direct laser writing (DLW) is a maskless laser-based technique that uses computer-controlled optics to 4. APPLICATIONS OF QUANTUM METAMATERIALS TO project the required nano-patterns directly onto the photoresist QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSING by holding the mask in software. It is suitable for large area In this section, we review the applications of QMM to quantum fabrication and has high precision, good uniformity and low information processing. QMM are an important optical material fabrication cost. The disadvantage of this technique is that there in quantum information processing due to their unique ways is no batch process. of controlling and manipulating electromagnetic waves. This Pattern Transfer Lithography (PTL) is a method developed has been exploited in a wide variety (various) of applications, in- to solve the problem of high throughput and large area during cluding wavefront shaping [29–31], polarisation control [13, 32], fabrication of the nanostructures. PTL include plasmonic lithog- performing quantum state engineering [9], quantum entangle- raphy (PL), nano-imprint lithography (NIL) and self-assemble ment [12], Quantum algorithm [7], orbital angular momentum lithography (SAL). PL is developed to have deep subwavelength generation [33], on-chip quantum information processing [34], resolution beyond the diffraction limit, unlike the traditional and many more. For clarity, we report in detail the applications photolitography that suffers from diffraction limit. The abil- of quantum metamaterials to quantum information processing ity to create subwavelength resolution and high throughput in subsections A to H as follow: Research Article Journal of the Optical Society of America B 4

A. Quantum State Manipulation and Control a quantum metamaterial; for example, the use of a plasmonic Quantum metamaterials have opened up new ways of manipu- metamaterial for the distillation of partially entangled Bell states lating and controlling the amplitude, phase, and polarisation of [12]. light at the single photon level for quantum information processing. Initially, the fabrication of metamaterials aimed to provide C. Single Photon Generation new materials with unusual passive electromagnetic properties In quantum information processing, single photons are usually such as artificial magnetism [35] and negative refractive index called qubits, which are the basic unit of quantum information. [36]. However, this whole concept may have been pushed to an- Qubits are the quantum analogue of a bit in classical comput- other level with the introduction of quantum degrees of freedom. ing. In quantum optics, single photons are mainly generated by This was achieved by embedding highly controllable quantum using a non-linear crystal (BBO) through spontaneous paramet- systems, such as quantum dots, cold atoms, Josephson junc- ric down conversion (SPDC) [46–48], a nitrogen vacancy defect tions, or molecules into the metamaterial itself [37–41]. Due to in diamond [49], and/or through solid state qubits (supercon- the quantum nature of these newly added media, the metama- ducting qubits) [50], cold atoms [51, 52], and quantum dots [53]. terial possesses many novel features and ways of controlling Some of the physical materials used for these processes are cum- and manipulating electromagnetic waves. The newly added bersome, for example, the optics used in the SPDC process which quantum media exhibit controllable quantum states that retain is more common is not suitable for on-demand single photons. quantum coherence times much greater than the traversal times Therefore, the need for better ways of generating single photons of an electromagnetic wave. Recently, quantum metamaterials in smaller material (of the order of nanometers) for quantum for controlling [37, 42, 43] and manipulating [15, 36, 44] single information processing is necessary. This is also where quantum photons for quantum information processing have been studied. metamaterials could provide/deliver a significant practical ad- The fundamental works of Rakhmanov et. al [37] and Wang et. vantage. In 2016, Poddubny et. al [54], theoretically obtained al [44] provided a new platform for using quantum metamateri- single photons or photon-plasmon quantum states in a non- als to control and manipulate light. In 2008, Rakhmanov et. al linear hyperbolic metamaterial with 70 % internal heralding [37], used a quantum metamaterial to control the propagation quantum efficiency. In their work, a pair of signal and idler sin- of electromagnetic waves in a way that is not possible with a gle photons from a laser beam through spontaneous non-linear normal classical structures. Wang et. al [44] obtained Hong-Ou- wave mixing inside metal-dielectric structures were reported. Mandel interference mediated by the magnetic plasmon waves in a three-dimensional metamaterial. Also, the control of quantum state has been reported in Josephson junction based control- D. Quantum State Switching lable quantum two-level systems for quantum computing using The ability to tune the frequency, phase, amplitude of light is superconducting qubits [36]. The same year, Bouchard et. al [33] essential to quantum information processing, most especially demonstrated optical spin-to-orbital angular momentum conver- doing this in nanomaterials because of their size. “Quantum sion in a quantum metamaterial or ultrathin metasurface with metamaterials have already/previously been used for quantum arbitary topological charges. Another important application of switchable related tasks [42, 55–57]. Microwave band gap tuning quantum metamaterial is found in their ability to control the was realized by Hutter [55] using one dimensional Josephson polarization of single photons effectively. Polarization is an im- junction arrays with generalized unit cells. The gap was tuned portant aspect of quantum communication since it can be used in a wide frequency range when an external flux was applied. to transmit single photons and make sensitive quantum mea- In 2014, Macha et. al [56] realized superconducting qubits using surements. The use of a plasmonic metamaterial in polarization quantum metamaterials to implement the AC-Zeeman shift of control of single photons for quantum information processing a resonant qubit. In 2015, Felbacq and Roussear [42] reported has been very successful in recent years. For example, Ren et al. all-optical photonic band control in a quantum metamaterial, [45] reported a novel optically reconfigurable plasmonic hybrid embedding quantum resonators within the nanorods. Their metasurface that enables polarization tuning at optical frequen- quantum metamaterial exhibits an all-optical switchable con- cies. Chen et. al [31] used a geometric metasurface based on duction band. Moreover, Shulga et. al [58] observed frequency chiral plasmonic stepped nanoapertures to demonstrate spin- tunable transparency in a microwaved transmission line using controlled wavefront shaping whereby the transmission from a a quantum metamaterial composed of twin flux qubits while sub-array is transmitted and the other is blocked. more recently, Hierro et. al [57] reported a phase transition in a semiconductor quantum metamaterial by tuning the quantum B. Quantum Entanglement wells thickness and the barrier height. Quantum entanglement is an important information resource in quantum information processing and one of the major appli- E. Quantum State Engineering cations where quantum metamaterials have been used exten- Quantum state engineering is the active control and manipu- sively. The work of Siomau et. al [21] in 2012 is a motivation lation of quantum states using quantum media. The ability for using QMM for generating quantum entanglement whereby to actively control and manipulate quantum states with quan- maximally entangled states were created using a negative-index tum metamaterials may lead to engineering metamaterial-based metamaterial. In 2013, Song et. al [22] theoretically designed a quantum transistors and switches. Recently, we reported the quantum metamaterial model for obtaining Bell-type entangled active control of a plasmonic metamaterial for quantum state coherent states for quantum information processing. Thereafter, engineering [9]. In our work, we actively tuned the transmission Pino [20] in 2014, detected and stored entangled states in the of single photons through plasmonic metamaterials when heat collective modes of the array of a plasmonic metamaterial. Their from an external laser was applied. However, the sensitivity and work drove immense interest in the field, which later lead to overall performance of this type of device can be improved with more practical ways of generating quantum entanglement using the addition of some non-linear media. Research Article Journal of the Optical Society of America B 5

F. Quantum key Distribution provides opportunities for OAM detection on-chip [103]. Quantum key distribution (QKD) is based on the transfer of single photons from one point to the next with the aim to distribute 5. SUMMARY a secure key that can be utilised for encryption. The single photons are hence referred to as the quantum carriers as they carry “In this work, we have briefly reviewed current progress on vital information for the key distribution process. QKD is based quantum metamaterials with applications to quantum informa- on the design and assemble of physical optical systems to ensure tion processing. For some years metamaterials research has security of information, and practically has been shown to pro- attracted much attention most in the classical regime, leading vide a future-proof technology for secure communications that to applications ranging from electromagnetic cloak to super- require confidential information to remain secure for extended resolution imaging. Still, the pursuit of how this unique artificial periods of time [59, 60]. QKD has been implemented via optical material "metamaterial" can be applied to quantum information mediums such as fibre [61–67] and free-space which includes processing is an open question, although ongoing research has ground-to-ground [68, 69] and satellite based communication yielded some positive results. In the quantum regime, appli- [70, 71]. Pan et al is leading the efforts towards the development cations such as wavefront engineering, performing quantum of a quantum network in free-space, which includes satellite state engineering, polarisation control, orbital angular momen- based communication, and fibre based intercity links [67, 70, 71]. tum generation and on-chip orbital angular momentum creation QKD has also been achieved underwater via submarines [72] have all been obtained. However, new methods that are cost and with the drive towards miniaturisation and low cost, the effective, suitable for large fabrication with good aspect ratio development of QKD technology is pushing the limits toward are still necessary to develop. Plasmonics and superconducting using nano-satellites known as CubeSat [73]. Machine learning metamaterials may be a promising candidate for on-chip high has been applied to QKD to improve the quantum channel and dimensional quantum communication. enhance the security during transmission [74–79]. Quantum Plasmonics, due to its versatility and ability to ultimately minia- ACKNOWLEDGMENT turize photonic components for quantum optic, is a new niche area which will be able to enhance QKD technology [80]. This work is based on research supported by the South African Research Chair Initiative of Department of Science and Technol- G. Quantum Algorithm ogy and National Research Foundation as well as the Thuthuka Quantum database search is important to quantum comput- grant. Opinions expressed and conclusions arrived at, are those ing. For example, the Grover search algorithm achieves the of the authors and are not necessarily to be attributed to the NRF. task of finding the target element in an unsorted database in time quadratically faster than the classical computer. A simi- Disclosures. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. lar search algorithm was shown to be possible with a quantum metamaterial. Recently, Zhang et. al [7] implemented a quantum search algorithm using quantum metamaterials. The quantum REFERENCES search algorithm is performed when an incoming wave that passes through the designed metamaterials and the profile of 1. V. G. Veselago, “The electrodynamics of substances with simultane- the beam wavefront is processed repeatedly as it propagates ously negative values of e and µ”,” Sov. Phys. Uspekhi 10, 509–514 through the unit cells arranged periodically in the metamaterial. (1968). Search items are found with the incoming wave all focusing on 2. J. B. Pendry, “Negative refraction makes a perfect lens,” Phys. Rev. √ Lett. 85, 3966–3969 (2000). the marked positions after ≈ N roundtrips. 3. D. R. Smith, W. J. Padilla, D. C. Vier, S. C. Nemat-Nasser, and S. Schultz, “Composite medium with simultaneously negative perme- H. Orbital angular momentum ability and permittivity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4184 (2000). Solutions to the Helmholtz equation produces an entire family of 4. A. Alu and N. Engheta, “Plasmonic and metamaterial cloaking: physical optical beams carrying Orbital Angular Momentum (OAM) [81]. mechanisms and potentials,” J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 10, 093002 These optical beams have been applied to numerous fields such (2008). 5. K. Kim, Y. Oh, W. Lee, and D. Kim, “Plasmonics-based spatially acti- as optical manipulation [82–84], quantum optics [85, 86], optical vated light microscopy for super-resolution imaging of molecular fluo- communications [87–89], quantum communication [69, 90–92] rescence,” Opt. Lett. 35, 3501 (2010). and many other multidisciplinary research areas [93]. There 6. C. L. Cortes, W. Newman, S. Molesky, and Z. Jacob, “Quantum are numerous experimental methods to produce these beams nanophotonics using hyperbolic metamaterials,” J. Opt. 14, 063001 [81, 94–100]. While Beijersbergen et al. [94, 95] were the first to (2012). demonstrate the existence of OAM beams by a method known 7. W. Zhang, K. Cheng, C. Wu, Y. Wang, H. Li, and X. Zhang, “Imple- as mode conversion, easier approaches are now used which menting quantum search algorithm with metamaterials,” Adv. Mater. include the use diffractive optics and digital holography. Meta- 30, 1703986 (2018). surfaces can be appropriately designed to produced tunable 8. J. Q. Quach, C. Su, A. M. Martin, A. D. Greentree, and L. C. L. Hol- OAM of surface plasmon polaritons, achieved by controlling lenberg, “Reconfigurable quantum metamaterials,” Opt. Express 19, 11018–11033 (2011). both the orientation angle and spatial position of nano aperture 9. S. A. Uriri, T. Tashima, X. Zhang, M. Asano, M. Bechu, D. O. Guney, array on an ultrathin gold film thus producing a field distribu- T. Yamamoto, S. K. Ozdemir, M. Wegener, and M. S. Tame, “Active tion of the surface waves which can be engineered to comprise control of a plasmonic metamaterial for quantum state engineering,” both spin dependent and independent OAM components [101]. Phys. Rev. A 97, 053810 (2018). Furthermore, the interaction between optical vortices and plas- 10. M. Mirhosseini, E. Kim, V. S. Ferreira, M. Kalaee, A. Sipahigil, A. J. monic nanoslits produces vortex beams, which as shown in [102] Keller, and O. Painter, “Superconducting metamaterials for waveguide may be used to detect the nanostructure on metal films. This quantum electrodynamics,” Nat. Commun 9, 3706 (2018). Research Article Journal of the Optical Society of America B 6

11. D. L. Andrews, “Quantum formulation for nanoscale optical and material 34. R. Szedlak, T. Hisch, M. Holzbauer, D. MacFarland, T. Zederbauer, chirality: symmetry issues, space and time parity, and observables,” J. H. Detz, A. M. Andrews, W. Schrenk, S. Rotter, and G. Strasser, “On- Opt. 20, 033003 (2018). chip generation of infrared orbital angular momentum beams using a 12. M. Asano, M. Bechu, M. Tame, S. K. Ozdemir, R. Ikuta1, D. O. Güney, dielectric metamaterial,” CLEO. (2016). T. Yamamoto, L. Yang, M. Wegener, and N. Imoto, “Distillation of photon 35. S. Xiao, U. K. Chettiar, A. V. Kildishev, V. Drachev, I. C. Khoo, and V. M. entanglement using a plasmonic metamaterial,” Sci. Rep. 5, 18313 Shalaev, “Tunable magnetic response of metamaterials,” Appl. Phys. (2015). Lett. 95, 033115 (2009). 13. Y. Zhao, M. A. Belkin, and A. Alù, “Twisted optical metamaterials for 36. Z. Ivic,´ N. Lazarides, and G. Tsironis, “Light manipulation by quantum planarized ultrathin broadband circular polarizers,” Nat. Commun. 3, metamaterials,” Contemp. Mater. 2, 186–189 (2014). 870–877 (2012). 37. A. L. Rakhmanov, A. M. Zagoskin, S. Savel’ev, and F. Nori, “Quantum 14. M. T. Nouman, J. H. Hwang, and J. Jang, “Ultrathin terahertz quar- metamaterials: Electromagnetic waves in a josephson qubit line,” Phys. terwave plate based on split ring resonator and wire grating hybrid Rev. B 77, 144507–144514 (2008). metasurface,” Sci. Rep. 6, 3906 (2016). 38. S. M. Anlage, “The physics and applications of the superconducting 15. K. Wang, J. G. Titchener, S. S. Kruk, L. Xu, H. Chung, M. Parry, I. I. metamaterials,” J. Opt. 13, 024001–024010 (2011). Kravchenko, Y. Chen, A. S. Solntsev, Y. S. Kivshar, D. N. Neshev, and 39. Y. A. Pashkin, O. Astavief, T. Yamamoto, Y. Nakamura, and J. S. Tsai, A. A. Sukhorukov, “Quantum metasurface for multiphoton interference “Josephson charge qubits: a brief review,” Quantum Inf. Process. 8, and state reconstruction,” Science. 361, 1104–1108 (2018). 55–80 (2009). 16. K. R. McEnery, M. S. Tame, S. A. Maier, and M. S. Kim, “Tunable 40. A. Shvetsov, A. M. Satanin, F. Nori, S. Savel’ev, and A. M. Zagoskin, negative permeability in a quantum plasmonic metamaterial,” Phys. “Quantum metamaterial without local control,” Phys. Rev. B 87, 235410 Rev. A 89, 013822 (2014). (2013). 17. A. Chipouline, S. Sugavanam, V. A. Fedotov, and A. E. Nikolaenko, 41. P. Jung, A. V. Ustinov, and S. M. Anlage, “Progress in superconducting “Analytical model for active metamaterials with quantum ingredients,” J. metamaterials,” Supercond. Sci. Technol. 27, 073001 (2014). Opt. 14, 114005–114013 (2012). 42. D. Felbacq and E. Rousseau, “All-optical photonic band control in a 18. Z. Zhou, D. Ding, B. Shi, X. Zou, and G. Guo, “Characterizing dispersion quantum metamaterial,” Ann. Phys. 529, 1600371 (2017). and absorption parameters of metamaterial using entangled photons,” 43. J. C. W. Song and N. M. Gabor, “Electron quantum metamaterials Phys. Rev. A. 85, 023841 (2012). in van der waals heterostructures,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 986, 986–993 19. A. Kamli, S. A. Moiseev, and B. C. Sanders, “Coherent control of low (2018). loss surface polaritons,” Phys. Rev. A. 101, 263601 (2008). 44. S. M. Wang, S. Y. Mu, C. Zhu, Y. X. Gong, P. Xu, H. Liu, T. Li, S. N. 20. J. Pino, J. Feist, F. J. Vidal, and J. J. García, “Entanglement detection Zhu, and X. Zhang, “Hong-ou-mandel interference mediated by the in coupled particle plasmons,” PRL. 112, 216805 (2014). magnetic plasmon waves in a three-dimensional optical metamaterial,” 21. M. Siomau, A. Kamli, S. A. Moiseev, and B. C. Sanders, “Entanglement Opt. Express 20, 5214 (2012). creation with negative index metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. A. 85, 050303 45. M. Ren, W. Wu, W. Cai, B. Pi, X. Zhang, and J. Xu, “Reconfigurable (2012). metasurfaces that enable light polarization control by light,” Liight Sci. 22. S. Y. Song, S. Wang, G. F. Xu, and G. L. Long, “Entanglement gener- Appl. 6, e16254 (2017). ation with coherent states using cross-kerr nonlinearity,” J. Opt. Soc. 46. J. J. Thorn, M. S. Neel, V. W. Donato, G. S. Bergreen, R. E. Davies, and Am. B 30, 2393 (2013). M. Beck, “Observing the quantum behavior of light in an undergraduate 23. S. A. Moiseev, A. A. Kamli, and B. C. Sanders, “Low-loss nonlinear laboratory,” Am. J. Phys. 72, 1210–1219 (2004). polaritonics,” Phys. Rev. A. 81, 033839 (2010). 47. P. Bronner, A. Strunz, C. Silberhorn, and J. Meyn, “Interactive screen 24. S. Wuestner, A. Pusch, K. L. Tsakmakidis, J. M. Hamm, and O. Hess, experiments with single photons,” Eur. J. Phys. 30, 345–353 (2009). “Overcoming losses with gain in a negative refractive index metamate- 48. B. J. Pearsona and D. P. Jackson, “A hands-on introduction to single rial,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 127401 (2010). photons and quantum mechanics for undergraduates,” Am. J. Phys. 78, 25. V. Yannopapas, “Quantum corrections in the optical properties of three- 471–484 (2010). dimensional plasmonic metamaterials with subnanometer gaps,” Solid 49. T. Schroder, F. Gadeke, M. J. Banholzer, and O. Benson, “Ultrabright State Commun. 222, 18–22 (2015). and efficient single-photon generation based on nitrogen-vacancy cen- 26. A. P. Sowa and A. M. Zagoskin, “An exactly solvable quantum- tres in nanodiamonds on a solid immersion lens,” New J. Phys. 13, metamaterial type model,” J. Phys. A. 52, 395304 (2019). 055017 (2011). 27. V. SU, C. H. Chu, G. Sun, and D. P. Tsai, “Advances in optical metasur- 50. W. F.Kindel, M. D. Schroer, and K. W. Lehnert, “Generation and efficient faces: fabrication and applications,” Opt. Express 26, 13149 (2018). measurement of single photons from fixed-frequency superconductor 28. R. Verre, M. Svedendahl, N. O. Länk, Z. J. Yang, G. Zengin, T. J. qubits,” Phys. Rev. A 93, 033817 (2016). Antosiewicz, and M. Käll, “Directional light extinction and emission in 51. P. Farrera, G. Heinze, and H. Riedmatten, “Generation of single pho- a metasurface of tilted plasmonic nanopillars,” Nano Lett. 16, 98–104 tons with highly tunable wave shape from a cold atomic ensemble,” Nat. (2016). Commun 7, 13556 (2016). 29. J. Li, C. Liu, T. Wu, Y. Liu, Y. Wang, Z. Yu, H. Ye, and L. Yu, “Direc- 52. M. Ho, C. T. H. Riedmatten, and N. Sangouard, “Optimal photon gener- tional light extinction and emission in a metasurface of tilted plasmonic ation from spontaneous raman processes in cold atoms,” New J. Phys. nanopillars,” Nanoscale Res. Lett 14, 34 (2019). 20, 123018 (2018). 30. F. Ding, Z. Wang, S. He, V. M. Shalaev, and A. V. Kildishev, “Broad- 53. L. Hanschke, K. A. Fisher, and K. Muller, “Quantum dot single-photon band high-efficiency half-wave plate: A super-cell based plasmonic sources with ultra-low multi-photon probability,” NPJ Quantum Inf. 4, metasurface approach,” Acs Nano 9, 4111–4119 (2015). 43 (2018). 31. Y. Chen, X. Yang, and J. Gao, “Spin-controlled wavefront shaping 54. A. N. Poddubny, I. V. Iorsh, and A. A. Sukhorukov, “Generation of with plasmonic chiral geometric metasurfaces,” Light. Sci. Appl. 7, 84 photon-plasmon quantum states in nonlinear hyperbolic metamaterials,” (2014). J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 117, 123901 (2016). 32. Z. Li, W. Liu, H. Cheng, S. Chen, and j. Tian, “Realizing broadband 55. C. Hutter, E. A. Tholen, K. Stannigel, J. Lidmar, and D. B. Haviland, and invertible linear-to-circular polarization converter with ultrathin “Josephson junction transmission lines as tunable artificial crystals,” singlelayer metasurface,” Sci. Rep. 5, 18106 (2015). Phys. Rev. B. 83, 014511 (2011). 33. F. E.Bouchard, I. D. Leon, S. A. Schulz, J. Upham, E. Karimi, and 56. P. Macha, G. Oelsner, J. Reiner, M. Marthaler, S. Andre, G. Schon, R. W. Boyd, “Optical spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion in U. Hubner, H. Meyer, E. Il’ichev, and A. V. Ustinov, “Implementation of ultra-thin metasurfaces with arbitrary topological charges,” Appl. Phys. a quantum metamaterial using superconducting qubits,” Nat. Commun. Lett. 105, 101905 (2014). 5, 5146 (2014). Research Article Journal of the Optical Society of America B 7

57. A. Hierro, M. M. Bajo, M. Ferraro, J. Tamayo-Arriola, N. L. Biavan, continuous-variable quantum key distribution,” Phys. Rev. A p. 022316 M. Hugues, J. M. Ulloa, M. Giudici, J. Chauveau, and P. Genevet, (2018). “Optical phase transition in semiconductor quantum metamaterials,” 80. S. Bozhevolnyi and N. Mortensen, “Plasmonics for emerging quantum Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 117401 (2019). technologies,” Nanophotonics 6, 1–4 (2016). 58. K. V. Shulga, E. Il’ichev, M. V. Fistul, I. S. Besedin, S. Butz, O. V. 81. L. Allen, M. W. B. adn R J C Spreeuw, and J. P. Woerdman, “Orbital Astafiev, U. Hubner, and A. V. Ustinov, “Magnetically induced trans- angular momentum of light and the transformation of laguerre gaussian parency of a quantum metamaterial composed of twin flux qubits,” Sci. laser modes,” Phys. Rev. A. 15, 8185–8189 (1992). Rep. 9, 150 (2018). 82. D. G. Grier, “A revolution in optical manipulation,” Nature. 424, 810–816 59. B. C. H, “Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states,” (2003). Phys. review letters 68, 3121–3124 (1992). 83. H. He, M. E. J. Friese, N. Heckenberg, and H. Rubinszteindunlop, 60. E. A. K, “Quantum cryptography based on bell’s theorem,” Phys. review “Direct observation of transfer of angular-momentum to absorptive letters 67, 661–663 (1991). particles from a laser-beam with a phase singularity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 61. S. Fasel, N. Gisin, G. Ribordy et al., “Quantum key distribution over 75, 826–829 (1995). 30 km of standard fibre using energy-time entangled photon pairs: a 84. N. B. Simpson, K. Dholakia, L. Allen, and M. J. Padgett, “Mechanical comparison of two chromatic dispersion reduction methods,” Eur. Phys. equivalence of spin and orbital angular momentum of light: an optical J. 30, 143 (2004). spanner,” Opt. Lett. 22, 52–52 (1997). 62. H.-K. Lo, M. Curty, and K. Tamaki, “Secure quantum key distribution,” 85. A. C. Dada, J. Leach, G. S. Buller, M. J. Padgett, and E. Andersson, Nat. Photonics 8, 595–604 (2014). “Experimental high-dimensional two-photon entanglement and viola- 63. B. Korzh, C. W. Lim, R. Houlmann, N. Gisin et al., “Provable secure tions of generalized bell inequalities,” Nat. Phys. 7, 677–680 (2011). and practical quantum key distribution over 307 km of optical fibre,” Nat. 86. J. Leach, B. Jack, J. Romerro, A. K. Jha, A. M. Yao, S. Franke-Arnold, Photonics 9, 163–168 (2015). D. G. Ireland, R. W. Boyd, S. M. Barnett, and M. J. Padgett, “Quan- 64. B. Frohlich, M. Lucamarini, F. J. Dynes et al., “Long-distance quantum tum correlations in optical angle-orbital angular momentum variables,” key distribution secure against coherent attack,” Optica 4, 163–167 Science. 329, 662–665 (2010). (2017). 87. G. Gibson, J. Courtial, M. J. Padgett, M. Vasnetsov, V. Pas’ko, S. M. 65. M. Peev, C. Pacher, R. Alléaume, C. Barreiro, J. Bouda, H. Zbinden, Barnett, and S. Franke-Arnold, “Free-space information transfer using A. Zeilinger et al., “The secoqc quantum key distribution network in light beams carrying orbital angular momentum,” Opt. Express 12, vienna,” New J. Phys. 11, 075001 (2009). 5448–5456 (2004). 66. S. Wang, W. Chen, Z. Q. Yin, H. W. Li et al., “Field and long-term 88. Y. Yan, G. D. Xie, M. P. J. Lavery, L. Li, Z. Zhao et al., “High-capacity demonstration of a wide area quantum key distribution network,” Opt. millimetre-wave communications with orbital angular momentum multi- Express 22, 21739–21756 (2014). plexing,” Nat. Commun. 5, 4876 (2014). 67. Q. Zhang, F. Xu, Y.-A. Chen, C.-Z. Peng, and J.-W. Pan, “Large scale 89. J. Wang, J. Y. Yang, A. E. W. I M Fazal et al., “Terabit free-space data quantum key distribution: challenges and solutions,” Opt. Express 26, transmission employing orbital angular momentum multiplexing,” Nat. 24260–24273 (2018). Photon. 6, 488–496 (2012). 68. R. Ursin, F. Tiefenbacher, T. Schmitt-Manderbach, H. Weier, T. Scheidl, 90. A. Vaziri, G. Weihs, and A. Zeilinger, “Experimental two-photon, three M. Lindenthal, B. Blauensteiner, T. Jennewein, J. Perdigues, P. Trojek dimensional entanglement for quantum communications,” Phys. Rev. et al., “Entanglement-based quantum communication over 144 km,” Lett. 89, 240401 (2002). Nat. physics 3, 481–486 (2007). 91. G. Vallone, V. D’Ambrosio, A. Sponselli, S. Slussarenko, L. Marrucci, 69. M. Krenn, J. Handsteiner, M. Fink, R. Fickler, and A. Zeilinger, “Twisted F. Sciarrino, and P. Villoresi, “Free-space quantum key distribution photon entanglement through turbulent air across vienna,” Proc. Natl. by rotation-invariant twisted photons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 060503 Acad. Sci. 112, 14197–14201 (2015). (2014). 70. J. Yin, Y. Cao, Y.-H. Li, S.-K. Liao, L. Zhang, J.-G. Ren et al., “Plas- 92. B. Ndagano, I. Nape, M. A. Cox, C. Rosales-Guzman, , and A. Forbes, monics for emerging quantum technologies,” Science. 356, 1140–1144 “Creation and detection of vector vortex modes for classical and quan- (2017). tum communication,” J. Light. Technol. 36, 292–301 (2018). 71. S. Liao, W. Cai, W. Liu et al., “Satellite-to-ground quantum key distribu- 93. G. Molina-Terriza, J. P. Torres, and L. Torner, “Twisted photons,” Nat. tion,” Nature. 549, 43–47 (2017). Phys. 3, 305–310 (2007). 72. S.-C. Zhao, X.-H. Han, Y. Xiao, Y. Shen, Y.-J. Gu, and W.-D. Li, “Per- 94. M. W. Beijerersbergen, L. Allen, H. van der Veen, and J. P. Woerd- formance of underwater quantum key distribution with polarization man, “Astigmatic laser mode convertors and transfer of orbital angular encodinga,” Opt. Soc. Am. A 36, 883–892 (2019). momentum,” Opt. Comm. 96, 123–132 (1993). 73. D. K. Oi, A. Ling, G. Vallone et al., “Cubesat quantum communications 95. M. W. Beijerersbergen, R. P. C. Coerwinkel, M. Kristensen, and J. P. mission,” EPJ Quantum Technol. 4, 1–20 (2017). Woerdman, “Helical wavefront next term laser beams produced with a 74. Y. Ismail, I. Sinayskiy, and F. Petruccione, “Integrating machine learning spiral phaseplate,” Opt. Comm. 112, 321–327 (1994). techniques in quantum communication to characterize the quantum 96. N. R. Heckenberg, R. McDuff, C. P.Smith, and A. G. White, “Generation channel,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 26, B116–B121 (2019). of optical phase singularities by computer-generated holograms,” Opt. 75. J. Li, Y. Guo, C. X. X Wang, L. Zhang, and D. Huang, “Discrete- Lett. 17, 221–223 (1992). modulated continuous-variable quantum key distribution with a 97. V. Y. Bazhenov, M. V. Vasnetso, and M. S. Soskin, “Laser modes with machine-learning-based detector,” Opt. Eng. (2018). screw dislocations in their wave-fronts,” JTEP Lett. 52, 429–431 (1990). 76. F N Khan and C Lu and A P T Lau, “Machine Learning Methods for 98. G. A. Turnbull, D. A. Robertson, G. M. Smith, L. Allen, and M. J. Padgett, Optical Communication Systems,” https://doi.org/10.1364/SPPCOM. “The generation of free-space laguerre-gaussian modes at millimetre- 2017.SpW2F.3. wave frequencies by use of a spiral phaseplate,” Opt. Commun. 127, 77. C. Jiang, H. Zhang, Y. Ren, Z. Han, K. C. Chen, and L. Hanzo, “Machine 183–188 (1996). learning paradigms for next-generation wireless networks,” IEEE Wirel. 99. J. Arlt and K. Dholakia, “Generation of higher-order bessel beam by Commun. 24, 98–105 (2017). use of an axicon,” J. Opt. 177, 97–301 (2000). 78. Y. Ou, E. Hugues-Salas, F. Ntavou, R. Wang, Y. Bi, S. Yan, 100. Y. Ismail, N. Khilo, V. Belyi, and A. Fobes, “Shape invariant higher- G. Kanellos, R. Nejabati, and D. Simeonidou, “Field-trial of machine order bessel-like beams carrying orbital angular momentum,” J. Opt. learning-assisted quantum key distribution (qkd) networking with sdn,” 14, 085703 (2012). https://arxiv.org/abs/180707858v1 (2018). 101. Q. Tan, Q. Guo, H. Liu, X. Huang, and S. Zhang, “Controlling the 79. W. Liu, Phuang, J. Peng, J. Fan, and G. Zeng, “Integrating machine plasmonic orbital angular momentum by combining the geometric and learning to achieve an automatic parameter prediction for practical dynamic phases,” Nanoscale. 9, 4944–4949 (2017). Research Article Journal of the Optical Society of America B 8

102. C. J. Min et al., “Plasmonic nano-slits assisted polarization selective detour phase meta-hologram,” Laser Photonics Rev. 10, 978–985 (2016). 103. Z. W. Xie et al., “On-chip spin-controlled orbital angular momentum directional coupling,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51, 014002 (2017).